MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, June 27, 2005

Similar documents
MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, November 28, 2005

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, March 27, 2006

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, May 8, 2006

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, October 23, 2006

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, January 22, 2007

D & E Construction Inc. (c/o Dennis Frischholz) Jerry Nokleby, Nokleby Surveying, Inc.

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, June 25, 2007

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, February 9, 2004

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Thursday, November 18, 2004

ST. MARY S COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING GOVERNMENTAL CENTER Tuesday, September 4, 2007

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

THE SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS

ANOKA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING ANOKA CITY HALL TUESDAY, MAY 16, :00 P.M.

(,, po uox 653. i'atuxent BUmlvE, LE6NARDT.*N, MD aat. St. MenY's CoUNTY GovERNMENT DEPARTMENT OF LAND USE AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT.

Planning Commission Hearing Minutes DATE: July 10, PC MEMBERS PC MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Barbara Nicklas Chair

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

Prince George s County Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations Rewrite March 13, 2017

CITY OF ALBERT LEA PLANNING COMMISSION ADVISORY BOARD

SECTION IV. Recommended Motion: Staff recommends the following motion (with modifications and additions following discussion):

DEWITT CHARTER TOWNSHIP 1401 W. HERBISON ROAD, DeWITT, MI PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 5, 2006

St. Mary s County Government. Land Use & Growth Management Citizens Academy September 30, PM

EDMOND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING. Tuesday, October 5, 2004

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Thursday, January 11, 2007

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY BOARD OF APPEALS ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Thursday, September 14, 2006

PUBLIC REVIEW MEETING

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ORDER AFFIRMING PLANNING BOARD DECISION, WITH CONDITIONS

SUMNER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 27, :00 P.M.

Minutes of the Proceedings Laramie County Planning Commission Prepared by the Laramie County Planning & Development Office Laramie County Wyoming

Cabarrus County, NC Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance. Contents

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Community Dev. Coord./Deputy City Recorder

City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2013

St. Mary s County Government. Land Use & Growth Management Citizens Academy September 29, PM

PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION. September 8, Minutes. Bruce Bixby Robert Calk Mike Dunnahoo Joy Ellinger Clint Rosenbaum

FRANKLIN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD. May 8, 2018

MINUTES ALPINE TOWNSHIP BOARD REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 20, 2008

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) ORDINANCE Revised November 2013

WHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and

MINUTES CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION

NORTH STRABANE TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION **MINUTES** January 15, 2018

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD

September 25, 2000 Minutes. September 25, 2000

R(C) Gray s Pointe. Docket Item "A" CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR MARCH 21, 2017

BETHLEHEM TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR PUBLIC MEETING September 25, 2006

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF LYON PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES April 11, 2005

(CHARLOTTE SKI BOATS) STAFF REPORT.PDF

Not Present: Steve Klar Charlene Beyer (non-voting School Board Representative)

CITY OF DURHAM DURHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA. Zoning Map Change Report. RR Existing Zoning. Rural Rural Density Residential Site Characteristics

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD

Jacque Donovan, Vice-Chair Sebastian Anzaldo Jeremy Aspen Jason Lanoha. Teri Teutsch, Alternate

1. Consider approval of the June 13, 2017 Regular Meeting Minutes

City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 26, 2015

City of Altamonte Springs Developer s Guide

Wood County Planning Commission May 6, 5:30pm

A Affordable Storage CUP Amendment, in Section 20, T35N R2W NMPM, at 4340B US Hwy 160W and 122 Meadows Dr.

O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)

WASHINGTON COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AUGUST 1, 2005

Chair Mark Seifert Presiding. 1. Roll Call. 2. Approval of Agenda. 3. Recognition by Planning Commission of Interested Citizens.

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018

Preliminary report for a mixed beverage late hours alcoholic beverage special use permit. Recommendation

Spartanburg County Planning and Development Department

City of Walker Planning Commission Regular Meeting November 16, 2011

Planning Board Minutes November 12, 2015

Minutes of 09/03/2003 Planning Board Meeting [adopted]

Planning Commission Hearing Minutes August 8, 2016

LOUDOUN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING. Wednesday, May 10, :00 p.m. Board Room, First Floor, Government Center AGENDA SUMMARY

Proposed 2.53 Acres Park Plan Designation: Regional Activity Center: See attached comments from the Planning Council.

Planning Commission Hearing Minutes August 10, 2015

MAJOR AMENDMENT PROCESS:

NORTH OGDEN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES. February 18, 2015

PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF SONORA OCTOBER 9, :30 P.M.

Hamilton County Regional Planning Commission

PORTER COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION Regular Meeting Minutes April 26, 2017

Lincoln County Board of Commissioner s Agenda Item Cover Sheet

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes

9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue

A REGULAR MEETING MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD JANUARY 05, 2009

TOWN OF NORTHBOROUGH Zoning Board of Appeals Town Hall Offices 63 Main Street Northborough, MA Fax

HARRIS TOWNSHIP Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 19, 2018

Staff presented two options for the Commission to consider recommending to Town Council:

Chairman Byrne called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and noted a quorum was present.

EAST BAY CHARTER TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION East Bay Charter Township Hall 1965 N. Three Mile Road Traverse City, Ml 49696

TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE OCTOBER 31, 2016 MINUTES. Municipal Complex, Building A, Public Meeting Room 1

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH [DRAFT] PLANNING COMMISION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2015

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING

French, Bruce. The applicant is requesting a zone change from Suburban to Rural Service Center.

City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of August 13, 2012

R(C) Rolling Hills Estates. Docket Item "E" CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR FEBRUARY 16, 2016

IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS CASE NUMBER S SNYDER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION THIRD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DATE HEARD: JULY 2, 2014

URBANDALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES. July 9, 2018

Dan Buday, Judy Clock, June Cross, Becky Doan, Toni Felter, Francis (Brownie) Flanders and John Hess

Meeting Agenda State College Borough Redevelopment Authority August 23, 2017 Room 241 / 12 p.m.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR VARIANCE APPLICATIONS Single-family or Two-Family Residential Properties (No Subdivision or Site Plan Application)

SWANZEY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES APRIL 17, 2006

Minnetonka Planning Commission Minutes. April 20, 2017

Peters Township Planning Commission September 15, :00 p.m.

Town of Holly Springs

CERTIFIED SURVEY MAPS

Transcription:

MINUTES OF THE ST. MARY S COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING ROOM 14 * GOVERNMENTAL CENTER * LEONARDTOWN, MARYLAND Monday, June 27, 2005 Members present were Larry Greenwell, Chairman; Joseph St. Clair, Vice Chair; Bryan Barthelme; Lawrence Chase; Julia King; Steve Reeves; and Howard Thompson. Department of Land Use and Growth Management (LUGM) staff present was Denis Canavan, Director; Jeff Jackman, Senior Planner IV; Phil Shire, Planner IV; Bob Bowles, Plans Reviewer I; Mark Kalmus, Planning Technician; and Sharon Sharrer, Recording Secretary. County Attorney, John B. Norris, III, was also present. The Chair called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of June 13, 2005 were approved as recorded. PUBLIC HEARING DECISION CWSP #05-120-003 GRANDVIEW HAVEN, Phase II, CWSP AMENDMENT The applicant is requesting amendment to service map III-18 to change the water service category from NPS (No Planned Service) to RW (Rural Water, developer financed). The property contains 151.98 acres; is zoned Rural Preservation District (RPD); and is located at 29282 Point Lookout Road; Tax Map 18, Grid 11, Parcel 13. Arrowhead LLC Dean Wilkinson, of R. A. Barrett Associates, Inc. The property was posted, legal advertisements were published on 5/4/05 and 5/11/05, and notices were mailed to the adjoining property owners. On May 23, 2005, the Planning Commission conducted and closed a public hearing, leaving the record open for ten (10) days for written comment. At the Planning Commission meeting on June 13, 2005, Commission members expressed concern that the two members of the Planning Commission who were unable to attend this meeting had previously had questions about this development, and made a motion to delay making a decision on this request until the full Planning Commission could be present for the discussion. Commission members expressed concern that only one well seemed to be planned for both Phase I and Phase II of this development. The applicant explained that MetCom will make the final determination on the number of wells required by the development. Chet Frederick, representing MetCom, explained that subdivisions of this size do normally require a second well to act as a

backup, though the second well may not need to be as large as the primary well for the development. Both wells would use the same aquifer, in this case the Patapsco. In response to questions from Commission members, Mr. Wilkinson provided information on the acreage preserved through open space and the use of Transferable Development Rights (TDRS) for the two phases of the development. Phase II provides for 76 acres of open space on site and 126 acres of land preserved offsite through the use of TDRS and Phase I provides 188 acres of open space on site and 264 acres of land preserved offsite through the use of TDRS. Commission members expressed concern with the volume of traffic a development of this size will add to area roads, which are already congested. Mr. Wilkinson explained that a traffic study was required as a part of concept review, but the review of this study is still in process. Mr. St. Clair asked that the full report be provided to the Planning Commission when the development returns for further review. Mr. Thompson moved that having accepted the staff report, dated May 6, 2005; and having held a public hearing on the request for amendment to the St. Mary s County Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan (CWSP); and having made findings of adequacy with respect to the objectives and policies of the CWSP as required by the Environment Article of the Maryland Annotated Code and of consistency with the St. Mary s County Comprehensive Plan; the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to amend the service categories from No Planned Service (NPS) to Rural Water Service (RW) to the Board of County Commissioners, and authorize the Chairman to sign a resolution transmitting this recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Chase and passed by a 7-0. PUBLIC HEARING CWSP #05-132-016 TOM HODGES AUTO SALES CWSP AMENDMENT The applicant is requesting amendment to service area maps III-27 and IV-27 to change the service area categories from W-6D and S- 6D (water and sewerage service in 6 to 10 years, developer financed) to W-3D and S-3D (water and sewerage service in 3 to 5 years, developer financed). The property contains 4.75 acres; is zoned Town Center Mixed Use (TMX); and is located at Tax Map 27, Grid 19, Parcel 855, Lots 1 and 4. Thomas H. Hodges David Herring, of D.H. Steffens Company John Parlett, of CMI General Contractors

The property was posted and legal advertisements were published on June 8, 2005 and June 15, 2005. Mr. St. Clair asked if the car wash would be open to the public. Mr. Parlett explained that the car wash will be used for cars being sold as well as open to the public. The Chair opened the hearing to the public. The public hearing closed with no comments. Mr. St. Clair moved that having accepted the staff report, dated June 15, 2005; and having held a public hearing on the request for amendment to the St. Mary s County Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan (CWSP); and having made findings of adequacy with respect to the objectives and policies of the CWSP as required by the Environment Article of the Maryland Annotated Code and of consistency with the St. Mary s County Comprehensive Plan; the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to amend the service categories from W-6 and S-6 to W-3D and S-3D to the Board of County Commissioners, and authorize the Chairman to sign a resolution transmitting this recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Barthelme and passed by a 7-0 vote. CWSP #05-132-011 TOYOTA OF SOUTHERN MARYLAND The applicant is requesting amendment to service area maps III-43 and IV-43 to change the service area categories from W-6 and S-6 (service in 6 to 10 years) to W-3D and S-3D (service in 3-5 years, developer financed). The property contains 6.9 acres; is zoned Corridor Mixed Use (CMX); and is located at Tax Map 43, Grid 9, Parcels 44, 45, 157, 281, and 426. 235 Realty LLC Richard McGill, of R.A. Barrett & Associates The property was posted and legal advertisements were published on June 8, 2005 and June 15, 2005. The Chair opened the hearing to the public. The public hearing closed with no comments. Mr. Reeves moved that having accepted the staff report, dated June 15, 2005; and having held a public hearing on the request for amendment to the St. Mary s County Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan (CWSP); and having made findings of adequacy with respect to the objectives and policies of the CWSP as required by the Environment Article of the Maryland Annotated Code and of consistency with the St. Mary s County Comprehensive Plan; the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to amend the service categories from W-6 and S-6 to W-3D and S-3D to the Board of County Commissioners, and authorize the Chairman to sign a

resolution transmitting this recommendation. The motion was seconded by Mr. Thompson and passed by a 7-0 vote. FAMILY CONVEYANCE MSUB #05-110-033 JOSEPH WHEELER RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 The applicant is requesting preliminary review of two additional lots on a private road in accordance with the St. Mary s County Subdivision Ordinance 02-02, Section 30.11.4, Family Conveyance Provision. The property contains 4.293 acres; is zoned Residential Low Density (RL); and is located at 20870 Old Gravel Road in Lexington Park, Maryland; Tax Map 51, Grid 21, Parcel 9, Lot 1. Mark A. & Dana W. Cullison Robert E. Trautman Receipts of certified mailings are on file. Mr. Shire explained that approval of this request would bring the total number of users on the private road to nine (9). Two formal agreements will be executed and recorded concurrently with the record plat; the first being a family conveyance agreement and the second a supplemental private road maintenance agreement to add to the maintenance agreements already in effect. Mr. Thompson moved that having accepted the staff report, dated June 15, 2005; and having made findings pursuant to Section 30.11.4 of the St. Mary s County Subdivision Ordinance (Criteria for Approval of a Family Conveyance); the Planning Commission grant subdivision plan approval, as requested. The motion was seconded by Mr. St. Clair and passed by a 7-0 vote. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CCSP #05-132-006 MECHANICSVILLE OFFICE BUILDING EXPANSION The applicant is requesting review and approval of a concept site plan for an 18,000 square foot medical office building. The property contains 4.0 acres; is zoned Town Center Mixed Use (TMX); and is located on the west side of MD Route 5, approximately 6,800 feet north of the MD Route 5 and MD Route 235 split; Tax Map 9, Grid 14, Parcel 320. Garner Morgan Jon Grimm, of Loiederman Soltesz Associates, Inc. The Chair stressed that the developer must maintain a good buffer between this office space and the adjoining residential property. Mr. Grimm explained that a full 30 foot type C buffer will be used, as well as retaining some

forest conservation area in its natural state in that area. Mr. Grimm explained that the plan is actually for two single story 9,000 square foot buildings, not one single 18,000 square foot building. Mr. Barthelme moved that having accepted the staff report, dated June 16, 2005; and having made a finding that the objectives of Section 60.5.3 of the St. Mary s County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance have been met; and noting that the referenced project has met all requirements for concept approval; the Planning Commission grant concept site plan approval, as requested. The motion was seconded by Mr. Thompson and passed by a 7-0 vote. CDSP #05-132-017 TAZELAAR PROPERTY The applicant is requesting review of a concept plan for 15 lots in a subdivision, in order to proceed with an amendment to the Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan. The property contains 6.22 acres; is zoned Residential Mixed Use (RMX), Airport Environs (AE) Overlay; and is located on the north side of Three Notch Road at By the Mill Road in California, Maryland; Tax Map 34, Grid 16, Parcels 33 & 441. Russell E. Tazelaar, Trustee Billy Mehaffey, of Mehaffey & Associates, PC Mr. St. Clair moved that having accepted the staff report, dated June 16, 2005; and having made a finding that the referenced project meets concept plan requirements to proceed with a Comprehensive Water and Sewerage Plan amendment to change the water and sewer categories from S-6D and W-6D to S-3D and W-3D; and noting that the subdivision plan must return to the Planning Commission for preliminary approval; the Planning Commission grant concept plan approval, as requested. The motion was seconded by Mr. Barthelme and passed by a 7-0 vote. CCSP #05-132-010 SOUTHGATE CENTER, PARCEL A The applicant is requesting review and approval of a concept site plan for 8 townhouse units. The property contains 1.74 acres; is zoned Residential Low Density (RL); and is located on the south side of MD Route 235, 300 feet south of Hermanville Road in Lexington Park, Maryland; Tax Map 52, Grid 8, Parcel 426. Emmet B. Potter, Trustee Jerry Nokleby, of Nokleby Surveying Mr. Shire explained that the proposed development is adjacent to and part of the existing Southgate development, and is located within the Lexington Park Development District. Mr. Nokleby explained that these eight townhouses will finish out the corner of the townhouse development.

Mr. Thompson moved that having accepted the staff report, dated June 16, 2005; and having made a finding that the objectives of Section 60.5.3 of the St. Mary s County Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance have been met; and noting that the referenced project has met all requirements for concept approval as a prerequisite for final site plan approval; the Planning Commission grant concept site plan approval, as requested. The motion was seconded by Mr. Reeves and passed by a 6-0 vote, with Mr. St. Clair abstaining from the vote. PSUB #04-120-023 ESTATES AT JOY CHAPEL The applicant is requesting preliminary plan review and approval of a 60-lot major subdivision. The property contains 33.87 acres; is zoned Residential Mixed Use (RMX), Airport Environs (AE) Overlay; and is located on the southeast side of Joy Chapel Road at its intersection with Mervell Dean Road in Hollywood, Maryland; Tax Map 27, Grid 19, Parcel 431. Dillow, Mark & Joanne M. Trust Bill Higgs, of Little Silences Rest, Inc. Mr. Shire explained that this site is within the Leonardtown High School service area, and staff can not support approval of the applicant s request for preliminary approval at this time due to the lack of elementary school capacity in the Leonardtown area. Mr. Thompson asked if access to this development off of Old MD 235 had been pursued. Mr. Higgs responded that State Highway Administration (SHA) did not want them to have access off of Mervell Dean Road. He explained that major improvements to the intersection of Joy Chapel Road will be made. Mr. Thompson explained that he would like to have had the opportunity to see the full comments from either SHA or DPW&T. Mr. Higgs explained that the applicant requested a place on the Planning Commission agenda even though they realize that there is no school capacity because they want to know what the policy will be for allocation of school seats when capacity becomes available in the future. He explained that they want to be on record as having a plan that has met all of the requirements for approval except for school capacity, to ensure that they are where they need to be when the capacity becomes available. Mr. Canavan explained that the effective date of the FY06 budget, as approved, is July 1, 2005. There are monies in the FY06 budget for an addition to Leonardtown Elementary School. School capacity for this addition can be counted as of July 1 st. Mr. Canavan explained that LUGM is working on an allocation policy. As capacity becomes available, LUGM will look at what subdivisions are in the queue and assign that available capacity. In terms of developing an allocation policy the development requests that may be in the Town of Leonardtown, grandfathered subdivisions, multi-family developments,

and single family detached homes in those subdivisions that have been submitted must all be taken into account. The Chair explained that the Adequate Public Facilities report provided with the staff report seemed to show a shortage of high school seats in the Leonardtown district. Mr. Canavan explained that the negative number of high school seats could be corrected if the Forrest Tech Center were taken into account. Mr. Canavan explained that he feels the County has come a long way in terms of budgeting money for future land acquisition, as well as design funds. He explained he can not give an exact number for the capacity that will be available as of July 1 st due to the recent reduction of class size made by the state. This must be taken into consideration when working out the exact numbers for capacity at the elementary school level. Mr. Thompson moved that the Planning Commission table the discussion until their July 11, 2005 meeting, after the discussion with representatives from the school system. Staff will provide further information on the school seat allocation policy at that time. The motion was seconded by Mr. Barthelme and passed by a 7-0 vote. Commission members expressed concern that subdivisions could lose their place in the queue if their request for approval was denied, or if other applicants took legal action on possible denials. Mr. Canavan explained that subdivision would not lose their place in the queue if denied simply because there is not adequate capacity at the schools. Mr. Norris explained that any applicants taking legal action because of a denial by the Planning Commission would first go to the Board of Appeals, before going to the Circuit Court. He explained that a case can not be settled by giving something the County does not have, in this case available school capacity. Mr. Norris said that neither denying nor tabling the request would give the applicant any different rights than they had before the decision was made. SSUB #04-120-009 WOODS AT MYRTLE POINT, Section 1, Phase 2 The applicant is requesting preliminary review of Section 1, Phase 2, 68-lots in a major subdivision. Section 1 of the property contains approximately 101.7 acres; is zoned Residential Low Density (RL), Airport Environs (AE) Overlay, Resource Conservation Area (RCA) Overlay; and is located on the west side of Patuxent Boulevard, approximately 1,600 feet north of its intersection with MD Route 4; Tax Map 34, Grid 6, Parcels 485, 585, 586, & 587. Longmore Myrtle Point Partnership, LLC c/o PF Summers Christopher Longmore, Dugan, McKissick, Wood, and

Mr. Shire explained that both Phase 2 and Phase 3 of Section 1 of The Woods at Myrtle Point are projects which are grandfathered under the prior Zoning Ordinance (90-11). Mr. Shire explained that one of the issues being questioned was whether a vested project has more standing in the hierarchy of the projects waiting in the queue for the availability of school capacity. Even under the prior Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission must make findings of Adequate Public Facilities (APF) for all adequate facilities except for stormwater management to grant preliminary approval. Paul Summers, Member Manager of Myrtle Point Partnership, LLC, explained that there are certain timing issues unique to the grandfathered projects that are different from projects being reviewed under the current Ordinance. He explained that projects under Ordinance 90-11 are tested differently from projects submitted under the current Zoning Ordinance as far as APF are concerned. Since projects under the prior Ordinance had to invest substantially more in the project prior to the preliminary plan approval stage, he explained that he felt they should not be penalized by having to meet the current Zoning Ordinance standards for APF for schools; they should be allowed to meet the APF tests from the prior Ordinance. Mr. Summers explained that his original approval had a phasing plan that extended to 2014, but now he must be completely approved by May 13, 2007 or begin the project over with the current Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Summers said that he feels his project clearly meets the requirements of the prior Ordinance for adequacy of schools. Mr. Longmore explained that the applicant has met the requirements of the prior Ordinance at substantial more cost to him than would have been required under the current Ordinance, and asked that he now receive the benefits provided under that prior Ordinance. He explained that both he and the applicant believe that there is adequate school capacity, based on the standards of Zoning Ordinance 90-11, and approval should be granted on that basis. Mr. Canavan explained that he would consider a text amendment to extend the May 2007 deadline. All of the engineering work that has gone forward could then still be recognized, but the actual development and the APF approval would be timed appropriately with the infrastructure. He explained that the service areas for schools were not defined under the prior Ordinance. He said that he felt it was incumbent upon the County to recognize that residential development should have adequate capacity. Mr. Canavan explained that he can not draw the conclusion that there are adequate facilities for this residential development to move forward at this time, and therefore can not recommend approval of the applicant s request. Ms. King expressed concern about the differing interpretations of the school service areas by the County and the applicant. Mr. Norris explained that he feels that Mr. Canavan s interpretation of school service areas is a reasonable interpretation that he would be willing to defend.

Commission members expressed concern about denying the applicant s request before hearing from representatives of St. Mary s County Public Schools at their meeting on July 11, 2005. Mr. Summers and Mr. Longmore both expressed concern that it could be much worse for the status of this project to delay the decision than it would be to deny the request, because they feel that they could lose some of their rights after July 1, 2005. They asked the Planning Commission to make a decision on the project at this meeting, even if that decision must be a denial. Commission members expressed a concern about voting to deny the request simply because they feel that more information is needed prior to making a decision. Mr. Thompson voted that the Planning Commission table the discussion until their July 11, 2005 meeting, after the discussion with representatives from the school system. Staff will provide further information on the school seat allocation policy at that time. The motion was seconded by Mr. Chase and passed by a 7-0 vote. SSUB #04-120-020 WOODS AT MYRTLE POINT, Section 1, Phase 3 The applicant is requesting preliminary review of Section 1, Phase 3, 21-lots in a major subdivision. Section 1 of the property contains approximately 101.7 acres; is zoned Residential Low Density (RL), Airport Environs (AE) Overlay, Resource Conservation Area (RCA) Overlay; and is located on the west side of Patuxent Boulevard, approximately 1,600 feet north of its intersection with MD Route 4; Tax Map 34, Grid 6, Parcels 485, 585, 586, & 587. Longmore Myrtle Point Partnership, LLP c/o PF Summers Christopher Longmore, Dugan, McKissick, Wood, and Mr. Thompson voted that the Planning Commission table the discussion until their July 11, 2005 meeting, after the discussion with representatives from the school system. Staff will provide further information on the school seat allocation policy at that time. The motion was seconded by Mr. Chase and passed by a 7-0 vote. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:12 p.m. Sharon J. Sharrer Recording Secretary

Approved in open session: July 11, 2005 Larry Greenwell Chairman