Streamlining the Entitlement Process for Transit-Oriented Development

Similar documents
CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

City of Bellingham Redevelopment Incentive Recommendations at a Glance

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Amendment HEARING DATE: MAY 10, 2018

Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed As of September 2014

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed. November 2009 COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS. Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No.

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

Town Centre Community Improvement Plan

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Proposed Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Planning Commission Public Hearing

PART ONE - GENERAL INFORMATION

TOD and Equity. TOD Working Group. James Carras Carras Community Investment, Inc. August 7, 2015

Attachment 4. Planning Commission Staff Report. June 26, 2017

GETTING IT BUILT: OVERCOMING THE IMPLEMENTATION BARRIERS TO SMART GROWTH

DZC and DRMC Amendments to Implement 38th and Blake Station Area Height Amendments

PROPOSED METRO JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: POLICIES AND PROCESS July 2015 ATTACHMENT B

Draft for Public Review. The Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan

A Guide to the Municipal Planning Process in Saskatchewan

Infill Development Incentive Policy

ORDINANCE NO

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

County of Volusia Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Local Housing Incentive Strategies 2016 Final Report

Puyallup Downtown Planned Action & Code Changes. January 10, 2017

13 Sectional Map Amendment

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

A Guide for Developers, Public Officials, and Lenders

Summary of Findings & Recommendations

VILLAGE OF NORTHBROOK AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

Annotated Outline of a New Zoning Ordinance... 1

Land Development Code Update Workgroup AGENDA

Barbara County Housing Element. Table 5.1 Proposed Draft Housing Element Goals, Policies and Programs

Planning Commission Report

PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

Community Planning Permits Technical Report

SECURED MARKET RENTAL HOUSING POLICY NEW WESTMINSTER

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

ARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

SUBJECT: AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 13 DATE: June 5, 2017 OF THE SAN JOSE MUNICIPAL CODE

CITY OF FARMERSVILLE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA November 17, :30 P.M. 1, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL

MOTION NO. M Capitol Hill Transit-Oriented Development Purchase and Sale Agreement and Ground Lease

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN Responses to Questionnaire for HUD s Initiative on Removal of Regulatory Barriers: May 11, 2007 Status

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

MEMORANDUM. Mr. Sean Tabibian, Esq. Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty. DATE May 26, 2017

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Housing Element (H) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

174 North King Street Workforce Housing Development Downtown Jackson, Wyoming

Affordable Housing Incentives. Regional TOD Advisory Committee June 15, 2018

Town of Bristol Rhode Island

b. providing adequate sites for new residential development

êéëé~êåü=üáöüäáöüí Livable Lanes: A Study of Laneway Infill Housing in Vancouver and Other Growing B.C. Communities

City of Regina Underutilized Land Study External Stakeholder Report

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

Pierce County Comprehensive Plan Review

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

ORDINANCE City of DeBary Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 3

5.03 Type III (Quasi-Judicial) Decisions

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media

Advisory Design Panel Report For the Meeting of February 27, 2019

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

Understanding the Development Review Process in the City of Minneapolis

Comparative chart on Berkeley proposed Downtown zoning initiative June 20, 2014

MEMORANDUM. City Council. David J. Deutsch, City Manager. County Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Briefing. DATE: June 11, 2015

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

JULY 4, BC Non-Profit Housing Association s Submission to the Rental Housing Task Force Consultation Process

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and. 10 WHEREAS, for year 2015, the City is required to conduct a "Periodic

City of Sebastopol Housing Subcommittee HOUSING ACTION PLAN SURVEY RESULTS From May 22, 2016 Meeting

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Zoning Diagnosis March 2014

Primary Districts Established 4

Master Plan Review SILVER SPRING CBD. Approved and Adopted February Updated January 2013

The Corporation of the District of Central Saanich

Article 6: Planned Unit Developments

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Ordinance No : Density Bonus Regulations

In order to permit maximum applicability of the PUD District, PUD-1 and PUD-2 Districts are hereby created.

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

Land Use Code Streamlining 2012

CITY OF COLD SPRING ORDINANCE NO. 304

Housing Commission Report

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

Salem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6

CITY OF PENSACOLA AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVE PLAN

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

RFQ Questions and Answers Mercer Island Commuter Parking & Town Center Mixed-Use Project

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

[2015 INCENTIVE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION REPORT] STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)

Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862)

Incentives for Private-Sector Affordable Housing Development

PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING TOD: KEY FACTORS FOR SUCCESS. Sujata Srivastava Knowledge Corridor TOD Workshop June 5, 2013

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

Response to the Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury Report Affordable Housing Crisis Density Is Our Destiny

Transcription:

October 2012 Streamlining the Entitlement Process for Transit-Oriented Development Best Practices Summary Setting Ideas in Motion

Introduction and Overview Entitlement Process: The legal method of obtaining the necessary approval(s) for the right to develop property for a specific use. In real estate development, the entitlement (or approval) process is the legal method of obtaining the necessary approval(s) for the right to develop property for a specific use. Approval is based on many factors including the proposed use, previous use and surrounding uses, conformity with the current zoning ordinance, or a request to amend the zoning ordinance to allow the proposed use. Complicated, ill-defined and time-consuming approval processes are often a deterrent to private developers. More often than not, the entitlement process for a proposed development may require a developer to navigate many layers of governmental and public approval including staff review, various boards and commissions, public input, and legal review. Delays and uncertainty can cause significant increases in development costs, which in-turn may affect the eventual product cost and project feasibility. For every month a development is not under construction, a developer is losing potential sales revenue. TOD Plan As part of the Regional Transportation Authority s increased focus on implementing the recommendations found in past Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) planning studies, we are working with local municipalities to identify specific barriers and provide recommendations to streamline their entitlement process, thereby making investing in the community more attractive to potential developers and other investors. This streamlined process can be applied broadly, or be specific to TOD projects within the station area (and viewed as an incentive to pursuing TOD projects). Streamlining the process could include adjusting and reducing the submittal and review requirements and period for development proposals, as well as the timeline for governing body review and comment. Transit-oriented development (TOD): A sustainable form of development that encourages compact, mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented, high quality development at and around rail and bus stations and corridors that increases ridership to the system, supports long-term system capacity, promotes livable communities, and has the potential to generate additional funding for transit through sales tax revenue. TOD areas are defined as the half-mile radius from rail stations and quarter-mile radius from bus stations and corridors. - 1 -

Regulatory Barriers to TOD Implementation 1. Restrictive Land Use Policies Many zoning ordinances in the Chicago Region restrict TOD by not allowing the height, density and setbacks needed for proper TODs. Restrictive land use policies not only prohibit TOD, but also encourage auto-oriented development patterns that separate uses by type and discourage compact development. Discouraging TOD through outdated zoning ordinances will deter developer investment because changing zoning regulations on a parcel-byparcel basis is a time-consuming effort. 2. Inconsistent and Redundant Practices Before construction can occur, a developer must receive approval from various municipal departments, boards, and/or commissions, each of which regulates a certain aspect of development. This may include land use and design (zoning, plan commission), utilities (engineering department), and compliance with building codes. Quite often each department has their own application requirements and administrative processes which may contradict each other. Submitting plans to multiple departments with different requirements and processes can cause a developer to spend an increasing amount of time and money in order to receive the appropriate approvals for a development. Lengthy and complex processes can not only stall development proposals, but cause some of them to never be built. 3. Streamlined Public Process Public involvement in any proposed development is important. However, long public comment periods may extend the pre-construction period beyond what may be financially feasible for the project. Municipalities are encouraged to set up a streamlined public process that allows adequate public involvement, yet is not repetitive or time-consuming causing extensive delays between meetings. Similar to other types of construction delays, extensive time in between meetings can increase pre-development costs and affect the eventual market price of the product. Solution: Amending zoning ordinances to include TOD overlay districts, form-based regulations and planned-unit development (PUD) processes help streamline the approval process. This will allow for TOD, and attract investment by providing a way to expedite the approval process for proposals adhering to the regulations. Solution: Rather than requiring developers to visit and submit plans to multiple offices, some municipalities combine services to one department. Providing one location for developers to submit proposals for permitting, licensing, plan review and other development approval services can simplify the approval process and enable improved coordination and communication among municipal staff. Solution: Encouraging developers to adhere to the zoning ordinance (without requesting variances) can not only streamline the approval process, but allow for a streamlined public involvement. - 2 -

Benefits of a Streamlined Entitlement Process For Municipalities: A streamlined entitlement process, especially for TOD projects, will increase administrative responsibility in a municipality and decrease the potential for multiple reviews of the same plan. If staff has a clear understanding of the TOD zoning regulations and the process by which they are empowered to approve aspects of a proposal, the governing bodies (zoning board of appeals, village board, and city council) will have more room on agendas for special uses, variance requests, and other municipal matters. Impacts on TOD A streamlined entitlement process for TOD projects would not only attract development, but it would attract development at a faster pace than in nontod locations. If a TOD project can receive all necessary approvals in a timely and efficient manner, the project timeline will be shorter and activity will be generated in the TOD in a shorter timeframe. This will bring increased revenues to the TOD area, including additional ridership on transit services. The direct and indirect costs that stem from delays during the approval process can ultimately affect the consumer s price for a home. In order to keep these costs down, it is in the municipality s best interest to expedite the approval process. For Developers: Developers will see pre-construction cost savings with a streamlined process; approvals will take less time, which directly relates to a decrease in the amount of time a piece of land sits vacant, not collecting property taxes. A clearly-defined process will allow developers to put their best foot forward from the beginning if they would like an expedited approval process. If a developer chooses to propose a project as-ofright, the process to approve the project should be completed in a relatively timely manner. By expediting the development process, developers can construct, market and sell a project at a faster pace, allowing them to move on to the next revenue-generating project. Impacts on TOD By creating a streamlined entitlement process for TOD projects, municipalities can realize quicker implementation of TOD Plans by attracting development at a faster pace. This will bring much-needed tax revenue to the TOD area, additional residents to use area amenities, and add ridership to existing transit service. -3-

Tools to Streamline the Entitlement Process for TOD Zoning As of Right : To allow for TOD, a municipality can create a special TOD zoning designation, change existing zoning classifications, require review through the planned unit development process, or create special design standards to be applied to TOD areas. The creation of an overlay zone is one such common example of the application of design standards to existing zoned areas, as opposed to changing or revising current zoning classifications. As its name implies, an overlay zone is placed on the zoning map over an existing zoning district(s). The overlay zone modifies, eliminates, or adds regulations to the base zoning designation by effectively controlling land use without increasing the complexity of zoning regulations. Complies with all applicable zoning Clearly-defined TOD land control regulations minimize uncertainty for developers, minimize opportunities for variances and special uses and maintain the community s design, form and character goals for their TOD area. Additionally, transit-supportive ordinance updates may minimize administrative confusion by outlining all standards, requirements and guidelines. Encouraging developers to build as of right (complies with all applicable zoning regulations and does not require a special permit or variance) will expedite this process, but only if the TOD zoning regulations are realistic and match the desires of the private development industry. Manhattan TOD regulations and does not require a special permit or variance. Blue Island TOD Prairie Grove TOD -4-

Developer Incentives to Attract TOD Parking Reductions Reducing the minimum parking requirements or setting maximum parking requirements in and around transit areas can lower the construction costs of development. Less parking also encourages transit use by making it less convenient and more costly to drive. The RTA recently released a Parking & Access Strategies Report as a resource for municipal officials looking for innovative strategies to support multimodal access to their transit station and TOD area. The Report outlines various strategies to manage parking in a TOD area. The full report can be found here: www.rtachicago.org/initiatives/land-usetransit-oriented-development.html Density Bonuses Increased density allows a developer to take advantage of greater economies of scale by building more units within a building footprint. Allowing higher densities near transit maximizes the amount of people with access to transit services, encouraging more use. Creating compact, pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods can also provide support to the local economy by increasing the need for local retail/ commercial amenities. Reduction of Permitting Fees TOD projects often require increased permitting and impact fees to ensure that the municipality has adequate financial resources to provide utilities and services. Many municipalities offer a reduction or waiver in fees if developers include an affordable housing component to TOD projects, provide streetscape improvements to the area surrounding the development, or provide additional amenities requested by the municipality. Offering a reduction or waiver of certain permit and impact fees is a negotiating tool that can benefit both the municipality and developer. -5-

Simplify the Process By reducing the amount of text in a zoning ordinance that describes the submittal and approval process to clearly-outlined flowcharts or checklists, a municipality can mitigate confusion and misunderstanding. Flowcharts and checklists are not only helpful for developers; municipal staff would have a simple guide available quickly without spending time searching through the zoning ordinance for the proper approval process. Example of a Typical Complex Entitlement Process The above process is complex, confusing and unclear. A complicated process that has many layers and no clear, direct path to approval may deter developers and cause administrative staff to spend additional time processing and tracking submittals. - 6 -

Example of a Streamlined Process for TOD The City of Blue Island adopted a new zoning district for their TOD area on June 12, 2012. This new district, entitled the Uptown Transit-Oriented District, includes a streamlined approval process for TOD projects. This checklist is to be used by developers to determine the approval process for their proposed project. Administrative Review Historic Preservation Commission Plan Commission Zoning Board of Appeals City Council Estiminated Approval Time New Development/Redevelopment R R D 2 months Major Reconstruction/Addition R D 1 month Change of Use D 1 month Change of Owner D 1 month Site Improvement (Landscape, Parking) D 1 month Outdoor Dining D 2 weeks Signs D 2 weeks Large Signs & Murals on Existing Buildings R D Internally Illuminated Signs R D Awnings & Canopies D 2 weeks Lighting D 2 weeks Facade Improvements D 1 month This approval process for TOD projects is clear, concise, and allows administrative staff to approve certain projects based on their adherence to the zoning regulations. Collective & Shared Parking D 1 month Parking Waiver R R D 6 weeks Variation R < D 2 months Special Use R < D 2 months Zoning Change/Amendment R < D 2 month Subdivision Plats R < D 2 months Local Landmark Buildings R D 1 month Review and Recommendation Public Hearing Final Approval - 7 -

Examples of Streamlined Entitlement Processes Los Angeles, CA Los Angeles Enacts Streamlined Entitlement Process: The Multiple Approvals Ordinance aims to minimize the confusion, uncertainty, and delay often resulting from the current system of individualized entitlements review by encouraging a comprehensive review of proposed projects and streamlined processes for analyzing the merits of proposed projects requiring multiple discretionary approvals. All section references below are to the Code as amended by the Multiple Approvals Ordinance. n Requires concurrent filing n Clarifies and coordinates procedure n Establishes uniform expiration dates n Entitlements approved in conjunction with other approvals Significance to developers: If a developer or other applicant for multiple approvals can file for all approvals at the same time, then the Multiple Approvals Ordinance may create more consistency in the entitlements process and save time and resources by eliminating redundant procedures. Moreover, the synchronization of extensions and expiration periods may provide more certainty as to the life of certain entitlements and help developers create manageable development schedules. (http://www.martindale.com/zoning-planning- land-use-law/article_pircher-nichols- Meeks_1525256.htm) Sunnyvale, CA Sunnyvale, California pioneered the idea of a one-stop shop, opening its One-Stop Permit Center in 1985 after interviews with local business leaders, property owners, and developers revealed the need for a better-coordinated and streamlined regulatory approvals process. The Center is staffed by members of the Community Development, Public Works, and Public Safety Departments, who provide an array of services including plan checks, permitting, and licensing. (http://transitorienteddevelopment.dot.ca.gov/ PDFs/TOD%20Study%20Exectutive%20 Summary.pdf) City of Chicago Green Permit Program Chicago s Green Permit Program offers an incentive to developers in the form of an expedited permitting process and tailored design and permitting support for projects that meet green building criteria. The program offers two main incentives. The first incentive is that permitting time is reduced to as little as six weeks from the time of construction document submission approximately half the typical time required. The second incentive is that the program offers a more direct financial benefit in the form of reduced permitting fees. Developers typically pay additional fees for the services of city plan review consultants up to 100% of these fees are waived for projects that qualify. The program provides a building permit turnaround time of 30 business days, which corresponds to the time between submission of the building permit application with complete drawings and the time a building permit is issued. Program officials note that for large commercial projects, this turnaround time compares to an average of about 90 days for permitting non-expedited projects. The turnaround time is broken down as: two weeks for agency review, two weeks for the applicant to respond to the review, and two weeks to address other issues that arise. (www.cityofchicago.org/city/en/depts/bldgs/provdrs/ green_permit.html) City of Wood Dale, IL The City of Wood Dale recently revised their zoning ordinance by adopting a Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) for the entire City. Within this ordinance is a streamlined procedure for development proposals. Before the UDO was adopted, the approval process could have taken over 1 year. The UDO streamlines this process to 6-9 months. (http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/index. php?book_id=691) Village of Manhattan, IL The Village recently adopted a new zoning district entitled the Downtown District. The ordinance outlines a streamlined review process for all new development proposals; any preliminary site plans that have been approved and platted as part of the Village Center Master Plan may be approved by Village Staff. (www.rtams.org/rtams/planningstudy.jsp?id=291) - 8 -

Additional References National Association of Homebuilders Streamlining the Development Approval Process http://www.nahb.org/fileupload_details.aspx?contentid=18639 Transit Cooperative Research Program TOD in the United States: Experiences, Challenges and Prospects. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_rpt_102.pdf Tools for Mixed-Income TOD http://www.reconnectingamerica.org/assets/uploads/tools.pdf From Barriers to Solutions Best Practices: Urban Centers & TOD in Washington http://www.reuw.washington.edu/research/download/biblio_revised_v6_merged.pdf Urban Land institute Entitlements 101 Navigating the Permit Process http://www.ulisf.org/south-bay/entitlements-101-navigating-through-the-permit-process/ Los Angeles Enacts Ordinance to Streamline Entitlement Process http://www.pircher.com/resources/legalupdate.php?i=254 PolicyLink (National Research and Action Institute) Transit-Oriented Development Tools www.policylink.org/site/c.lkixlbmnjre/b.5137373/k.e65e/transit_oriented_development.htm Morgan Stanley How Transit-Oriented Development Can Help Get America To Work http://www.morganstanley.com/globalcitizen/pdf/report-08102012.pdf Livable Places Encouraging Transit Villages http://www.livableplaces.org/policy/todincentives.html -9 -