To: Common Council From: Ari Lavine, City Attorney Subject: Adjustments to Stormwater User Fees Date: October 3, 2018

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the County Council desires to amend the current Code of

CITY OF GLASGOW ORDINANCE NO. 2809

PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR EXPENDITURE OF REVENUE; PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT

PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION

Craig E. Leen, City Attorney

ORDINANACE NO

Appendix J: Stormwater Utility Ordinance Guidance

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND FACILITIES

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE THE, CHAPTER 33 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

Change 6, September 1, TITLE 18 WATER AND SEWERS 1

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, in Chapter 166 Municipalities, Florida Statutes, the Florida State

OFFICIAL TOWNSHIP OF MOON ORDINANCE NO.

Lorain County Storm Water District. Lorain County, Ohio. Frequently Asked Questions

Preliminary Analysis

ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF REDCLIFF BYLAW NO. 1829/2016

PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL SURFACE WATER RATE RESOLUTION

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL AMENDING CHAPTER SUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

CITY ADMINISTRATION COMMMITTEE

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

ORDINANCE NO

TOWN OF DYER, LAKE COUNTY, INDIANA ORDINANCE NO.:

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 04/05/2016 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District Ordinance Code: Ordinance CHAPTER 4 DRAINAGE FEES

S 2001 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2005

CHAPTER REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT FEES. Sections:

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2003

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NANAIMO BYLAW NO. 1469

CHAPTER 5 RULES, RATES AND CHARGES FOR THE STORMWATER UTILITY SERVICE 1

TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE NOTICE OF FINAL ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO

A Guide to Establishing Additional Service Areas in Rural Municipalities

ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE of the City of Asotin relating to Storm Sewer and Surface Water Management Public Utility

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

STAFF REPORT NO

Opening Ceremonies 1. Welcome/Introductions Sharla Bynum 2. Serious Moment of Reflection/Pledge of Allegiance Portia Mila

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF GAINES COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH WATER SUPPLY AND SEWER RATES AND CHARGES

CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF HANOVER, N.H.

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Managing Division / Dept: Office of Management & Budget

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SPRING HILL MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 5, IMPACT FEE-PURPOSES AND ADMINISTRATION

City of Titusville "Gateway to Nature and Space"

RESOLUTION NO

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN ORDINANCE NO

CHAPTER House Bill No. 963

SEWER RATES AND CHARGES

URGENCY ORDINANCE NO. 1228

Ordinance No. An Amendment to the City Code of Ordinances

South Carolina General Assembly 119th Session,

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 16, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. 35. Public Hearing [t(" Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda D

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

5' PROVIDING THAT THE NORTHEAST HERNAmO

Village Hall At The Regatta P.O. Box 369 OFFICE OF. Village of Mamaroneck Private Sewer Lateral Law

ORDINANCE NO XX

CHAPTER 4 IMPACT FEES

ORDINANCE 93-7 "EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE"

WAYNE COUNTY, UTAH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231

ALLENDALE CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO RENTAL HOUSING REGISTRATION ORDINANCE RESTATEMENT

Impact Fees. Section 1 Purpose and Intent.

Dedicated program for municipal drainage management

TOWN OF AVON, COLORADO ORDINANCE NO SERIES OF 2014

SUMTER COUNTY, FLORIDA FIRE RESCUE SERVICES ASSESSMENT ANNUAL ASSESSMENT RATE RESOLUTION THE VILLAGES FIRE DISTRICT

Public Improvement District (PID) Policy

Opening Ceremonies 1. Welcome/Introductions Portia Mila 2. Serious Moment of Reflection/Pledge of Allegiance Sharla Bynum

FLORIDA CONSTITUTION

December 30, Robert L. Whritenour, Jr., Administrator Town of Falmouth 59 Town Hall Square Falmouth, MA 02540

Charter Township of Bedford 115 S. ULDRIKS DRIVE BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN 49037

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

Ordinance No Affordable Housing Ordinance Borough of Glen Ridge, Essex County

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS LOWER GWYNEDD TOWNSHIP MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ORDINANCE NO. Park and Recreation Areas; Fee in Lieu of Dedication

ORDINANCE CITY OF DUNDAS RICE COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA

JHA/ERC Billing Policy #1

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 429

Stormwater Fees for Cemeteries

SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JANUARY 25, 2018

Creation of the Lake Holiday Sanitary District;

Planning and Zoning Commission STAFF REPORT

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, in adopting this Ordinance, the Board of Directors finds that:

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, on April 8, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No to establish parkland fees for secondary units; and

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

Property Development Standards All Zones. Property Development Standards Commercial and Industrial. Property Development Standards Mixed Use

SURFACE WATER ULTILITY FEE CITY OF WASECA

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)

AGREEMENT FOR PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES FOR REAL PROPERTY AND PERSONAL PROPERTY. between. and THE TOWN OF DOUGLAS

House Joint Resolution 1

CITY COUNCIL REPORT 2006-xx

Chapter 18 Taxation. Sec Annual property tax for payment of interest on bonds and retirement of bonds.

SUBSTITUTE NO. 3 TO ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS FOR CITRUS HILLS FIRST AND SECOND ADDITION

YOUR DC WATER BILL WHAT CHANGES CAN YOU EXPECT? AOBA UTILITY COMMITTEE

ORDINANCE NO

Transcription:

CITY OF ITHACA 108 East Green Street Ithaca, New York 14850-5690 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY Aaron O. Lavine, City Attorney Telephone: 607/274-6504 Robert A. Sarachan, Assistant City Attorney Fax: 607/274-6507 Krin Flaherty, Assistant City Attorney Kevin Levine, Assistant City Attorney Jody Andrew, Executive Assistant To: Common Council From: Ari Lavine, City Attorney Subject: Adjustments to Stormwater User Fees Date: October 3, 2018 As you know, the City launched its Stormwater Utility law in January 2015. The ensuing three-plus years of activity enable us to evaluate the functionality of the law. Overall, the law is functioning well. Stormwater User Fees ( SUF s ) have successfully funded a variety of crucial work in support of the City s stormwater systems. But one fact stands out: the City spends markedly more each year on stormwater-related expenses than it collects in SUF s. This, in turn, means that the City continues to spend, on average, well over half a million dollars per year on stormwater services paid for by funding sources other than SUF s much of it, tax dollars. Taxes, of course, do not account for the amount of stormwater generated by impervious surfaces located on any given parcel and do not provide any incentive for property owners to reduce the amount of runoff generated by their properties. Additionally, employing taxes as the funding mechanism for stormwater-related expenses omits tax-exempt properties from participation in the funding of the stormwater programming and infrastructure needed to handle runoff generated by such properties. As a result, the local law accompanying this memo would adjust the Stormwater User Fees so as more closely to align the amount annually collected with the amount of annual expenditures on stormwater-related expenses. This adjustment would enable the City to expend elsewhere tax dollars that have historically been dedicated to stormwater expenses. In particular, the new street-paving crew under consideration is proposed at a total budget impact of $550,000 per year. The local law accompanying this memo would free up an estimated $583,000 per year in non-stormwater funding sources (i.e., taxes, grants, etc.) that could be spent on that new crew. This proposed increase in SUF s would enable the City to pay for a host of necessary stormwater services that have to date not been funded by SUF s. A few examples of such services from recent years include the 2016 Six Mile Creek Wall replacement project, the 2017 Cascadilla Creekway Project, the 2018 Warren Place culvert project, and the stormwater components of a variety of road reconstructions projects. Additional examples include staff time that is devoted to stormwater services and stormwater-related equipment costs.

As you can see in this local law, the proposed SUF rate, which would continue to be billed on a quarterly basis, is $14.25 per quarter for Residential Lots, meaning those tax lots containing 1-, 2-, or 3-family homes. For all other lots, the proposed rate is $21.75 per quarter per ERU (i.e., per each 2,300 square feet of impervious surface on the lot). Since 2015, these rates have both been set at $12 per quarter. While it is of course ultimately up to Council, the anticipated timeline for consideration of this local law runs parallel to the budget process, in order to enable you to account, if you choose, for the increased SUF revenue when making other determinations in the budget, such as the above-referenced street-paving crew. To that end, this memo and local law will be posted to the City s Budget website on October 4, included in the agenda for the October 18 budget meeting for discussion, and included in the agenda for the October 30 budget meeting for a vote (by Committee of the Whole). It could then come to a final vote at the November 7 Council meeting along with the full budget. Important Note: Because this is a local law, and thus subject to aging requirements, I note that if you plan to take your final vote on this local law on November 7 you will be unable to amend it in any way when voting it out of committee on October 30. I would therefore recommend a complete discussion of any changes that you may seek to this local law on October 18 so that they can be included in the version on which you could vote on October 30.

A Local Law Entitled Adjustments to the Stormwater User Fee WHEREAS, the City previously adopted Local Law 2014-03, authorizing the creation of a stormwater utility and the establishment of a stormwater user fee, and WHEREAS, that Local Law created a user fee funding stream to support stormwaterrelated expenses, such as construction and maintenance of storm sewers and channeled streams, environmental management, and regulatory compliance, and WHEREAS, Council s stated intent in that Local Law was for a stormwater user fee to replace taxes as the funding mechanism for stormwater-related expenses, because taxes do not account for the amount of stormwater generated by impervious surfaces located on any given parcel and do not provide any incentive for property owners to reduce the amount of runoff generated by their properties, and WHEREAS, Council noted in that Local Law that employing taxes as the funding mechanism for stormwater-related expenses omits tax-exempt properties from participation in the funding of the stormwater programming and infrastructure needed to handle runoff generated by such properties, and WHEREAS, City staff have been able to evaluate the functionality of that Local Law based upon the ensuing three-plus years of activity, and have concluded that the City spends markedly more each year on stormwater-related expenses than it collects in stormwater user fees, meaning that, on average, the City spends well over half a million dollars per year on stormwater services paid for by funding sources other than stormwater user fees much of it, tax dollars, and WHEREAS, Municipal Home Rule Law Section 10(1)(ii)(a)(9-a) authorizes the City to provide for the fixing, levy, collection and administration of rentals, charges, rates or fees, penalties and rates of interest thereon, liens on local property in connection therewith and charges thereon, now, therefore, BE IT ENACTED by the Common Council of the City of Ithaca as follows: Section 1. Legislative Findings, Intent, and Purpose. The Common Council makes the following findings of fact: A. The City currently expends far more funding on Stormwater Services, as defined in Section 283-1 of the City Code, than it collects in total Stormwater User Fees, thus necessitating substantial expenditures from other funding sources to provide necessary Stormwater Services. Those other funding sources include the General Fund (i.e., tax dollars) and outside funding sources, particularly state and federal grant funding. B. The City seeks more closely to align the Stormwater User Fees annually collected with the annual expenditures on Stormwater Services.

C. Every parcel of real property that contains impervious surface areas, both public and private, uses and benefits from the maintenance of the stormwater system, and those impervious surfaces that generate larger quantities or dirtier runoff use and benefit disproportionately. D. Those parcels of property constituting Non-Residential Lots, often containing parking lots and other automotive-intensive uses, are substantially more likely than Residential Lots, even when measured on a per-eru basis, each term as defined in Section 283-1, to produce stormwater containing hydrocarbons, trace metals (including cadmium, copper, lead and zinc), and chlorides, each of which are substantially attributable to automotive operations ranging from leaking oil and grease to shedding brake pads to salts that are applied to parking lots, as documented in the Department of Environmental Conservation s 2015 Stormwater Management Design Manual Chapter 2, Section 2.1. For example, that Manual notes that some areas that produce runoff with high runoff concentrations [of hydrocarbons] include gas stations, commuter parking lots [and] convenience stores. E. These more concentrated quality impacts on the stormwater managed by the City (i.e., more polluted stormwater on a per-square-foot basis) necessitate a higher per-eru User Fee Rate, as defined below, for Non- Residential Lots. F. Because an array of Stormwater Services remain to date funded by sources other than Stormwater User Fees, changed incentives continue to be required in order to motivate individual property owners to reduce the rate and volume of runoff from their respective properties and to increase the water quality of that runoff. Properties with large, impervious surfaces, such as parking lots, are often assessed at a lower value for property tax purposes than smaller properties with a residential building surrounded largely by pervious surfaces, even though the former properties have a much larger effect on the City s stormwater infrastructure. As a result, the costs of stormwater services required to meet the City s regulatory obligations, increase waterway quality, and protect City residents and businesses from flooding are not currently shared by each property fully in proportion to the demands it places on such services. G. Impervious surfaces that tax-exempt property owners have chosen to construct or maintain on their properties substantially increase the need for, and cost of providing, stormwater services. However, because a substantial portion of those costs to date continue to be paid out of the City s tax revenues, the owners of those properties do not proportionately participate in funding the infrastructure and services required by the runoff generated due to their decisions. Pursuant to Municipal Home Rule Law Section 10(1)(ii)(a)(9-a) the City of Ithaca is authorized to adopt a local law relating to the adoption of user fees. The user fee adjusted by this Local Law will be used to pay the costs incurred by the City in offering services and infrastructure to handle runoff caused by a property owner s choice to

construct or maintain impervious surfaces on a given property. Further, this dedicated source of funds for stormwater programming is needed for the City to address its aging infrastructure, the increasing number of federal and state regulations regarding the handling of stormwater with which the City must comply, and the increases in overall precipitation and heavy precipitation events that have already occurred, and are anticipated to continue, due to climate change. Section 2. Amendment to Section 283-1. Section 283-1 of the City Code, Definitions, is hereby amended to add at the end thereof: USER FEE RATE. The monthly User Fee Rate for Residential Lots is four dollars and seventy-five cents ($4.75); for Non-Residential Lots it is seven dollars and twenty-five cents ($7.25). Section 2. Amendment to Section 283-2(A). Section 283-2(A) of the City Code, Stormwater User Fees, is hereby amended as follows: A. Each Developed Lot in the City shall be subject to a monthly Stormwater User Fee equal to the product of [four dollars ($4.00)]the applicable User Fee Rate and the number of ERUs of Impervious Surface Area on the Lot as calculated below, less any credits for the Lot approved by the Superintendent pursuant to Section 283-3. (1) Every Residential Lot, and each Non-Residential Lot with an Impervious Surface Area less than or equal to one (1) ERU, shall be deemed to have an Impervious Surface Area equal to one (1) ERU. (2) The number of ERUs of Impervious Surface Area on a Non- Residential Lot with an Impervious Surface Area greater than one (1) ERU shall be calculated by dividing the Lot s Impervious Surface Area by the value of one (1) ERU, and rounding the result up to the nearest one-quarter (1/4) of an ERU. Section 3. Severability Clause. Severability is intended throughout and within the provisions of this Local Law. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Local Law is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, then that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Local Law. Section 4. Effective and Operative Date. This Local Law shall take effect January 1, 2019, provided it is first filed in the office of the Secretary of State, or upon filing in the office of the Secretary of State thereafter.