River North (RiNo) Overlays.

Similar documents
DZC and DRMC Amendments to Implement 38th and Blake Station Area Height Amendments

38 th & Blake Height Amendments: Public Meeting #5 Building Design Comments July 13 th, 2016

Please visit to learn more about these proposed overlay zone districts.

Task Force Kickoff Meeting January 10, 2016

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Please visit to learn more about these proposed overlay zone districts.

BY AUTHORITY A BILL For an ordinance adopting a new Article VI in Chapter 27 of the Denver Revised

Community Open House March 8, 2017

We contacted all RNOs in the area to come to their meetings and personally explain the draft, and take questions. Four RNOs took us up on the offer,

CAN TRADITIONAL ZONING ACHIEVE OUR GOALS FOR DOWNTOWN ANN ARBOR?

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

KENECT DENVER 2136 LAWRENCE OPTIONAL CONCEPT REVIEW ARAPAHOE SQUARE DESIGN ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 20, 2018

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

PARK CHAMPA ARAPAHOE SQUARE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY ±.65 ACRES (28,489 SF) D-AS-12+ ZONING SITE PEPSI CENTER. Broadway. Park Ave

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE September 19, 2018

GRANADA POINTE GRANADA BOULEVARD DEVELOPMENT SITES

Office Development Annual Limit Program Status Update

Re: Item No Density Bonusing for Affordable Private Rental Housing

Town of Clinton, Connecticut Action Plan for the Historic Unilever Property and Area. Steering Committee Meeting #5 Implementation Strategies

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Date: January 9, Strategic Housing Committee. IZ Work Group. Legacy Homes Program

DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee

Implementation of Mandatory Housing Affordability (MHA) in Downtown/SLU

ORDINANCE NUMBER O- (NEW SERIES) DATE OF FINAL PASSAGE

Redline Document Conventions

LDC AMENDMENT BONUSES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Summary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Affordable Housing Plan

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: October 23, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Central Business District Core Ordinance

ARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

City of Salinas Nexus Studies Overview and Summary February 2016

Downtown Mortgage Assistance and Mortgage Assistance

Wheaton Sector Plan. Preliminary. Recommendations. Montgomery County Planning Board

NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY Request for Proposals - Workforce Housing Initiative Pilot Program November 2016

Executive Summary ADU Tracking Report

Tools to Provide Long-Term Affordability Near Transit and Other Location-Efficient Areas. June 16, 2011

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

DIVISION 1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

Article Optional Method Requirements

City and County of San Francisco

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

174 North King Street Workforce Housing Development Downtown Jackson, Wyoming

PUD Zoning Framework

Sherman Street North. Redevelopment Vision / Incentivized D-C Zoning. 11 September 2018

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PINE CANYON PD ZONING REGULATIONS

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

Re: Case # ZP Preplanning Application for 8 townhomes at 1526 Ingalls Street in Lakewood, CO.

Amendment to White Flint Development Agreement

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

CITY OF SAN MATEO BELOW MARKET RATE (INCLUSIONARY) PROGRAM

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE

RFQ Questions and Answers Mercer Island Commuter Parking & Town Center Mixed-Use Project

CALIFORNIA TAX CREDIT ALLOCATION COMMITTEE Project Staff Report 2012 First Round July 11, 2012 $443,552 $443,552 $1,774,207

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

ZONE TEXT AMENDMENT for ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs) Planning Board February 12, 2018

Coming Spring 2016 May 7-8 and 14-15

AGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome

Broadway Corridor Woodcliff Lake, NJ

Residential Density Bonus

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

CENTRAL SOMA PLAN LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENTS PROPOSED BY SUPERVISOR KIM AT 7/23 LAND USE & TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE

ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

INCLUSIONARY DWELLING UNIT PLAN APPLICATION

Affordable Housing in the Triangle: A Primer. Ken Bowers, AICP

The Corporation of the District of Central Saanich

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES

CONCEPTS WEST PALM BEACH MASTER PLAN UPDATE 1.0

SLOT HOME T A S K F O R C E M E E T I N G # 1 P A C K E T

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

Single Family Residential

Re: UDO Proposed Amendment # Lincoln County Planning and Inspections Department, applicant

CHAPTER 40R LOCAL ZONING BYLAW GUIDANCE DOCUMENT

forwarddallas! Development Code Amendments Approach Quality of Life Committee Briefing June 11, 2007

Affordable Rental Housing in Chapel Hill Challenges and Opportunities. Presented to Mayor s Affordable Housing Task Force June 6, 2013

PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT

Senate Bill No CHAPTER 928. An act to amend Section of the Government Code, relating to housing.

6-6 Livermore Development Code

Community Not Commodity September 27, 2017

698 2nd Avenue. Murray Hill Manhattan, NY

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

DISTRICT OF CRITICAL PLANNING CONCERN (DCPC) PUBLIC HEARING. March 28, 2018

Article 7. URBAN CENTER (C-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Request for Proposals

FOR LEASE GATEWAY PLAZA N Gateway Blvd, Fresno, CA For More Information:

ADDENDUM of PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

Transcription:

River North (RiNo) Overlays www.denvergov.org/38blake July 6, 2017

Progress & Updated Schedule Consultant Feasibility Testing on Incentive Height Overlay Planning Board Info Item July 19 City Council Committee Info Item Zoning Text Amendment Language for Review Zoning Map Amendment Boundaries for Review Planning Board Public Hearing City Council Public Adoption Hearing* Underway through July 2017 Late July Late August Late August October December *Projects may proceed through Site Development Plan approval process prior to adoption, but final approval of projects using incentives cannot occur prior to adoption

Overlay Zone Districts

Incentive Height Overlay Capture the value of increased height Relate to citywide linkage fee program Require multiples of citywide affordable housing fee/build alternative requirements only for stories above the base height 16

Incentive Height Overlay Future Building Height Map Adopted by City Council Fall 2016

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Overview Base Height Standard linkage fee Incentive Height - Additional requirements apply to incentive stories (note that affordable housing fee/unit requirements are never lower than citywide requirements) Residential Additional 4x citywide unit requirement No fee option Commercial Additional 4x citywide fee or unit requirement Option to provide community-serving uses Zoning code text and map amendments sponsored by Council President Brooks

38 th & Blake Height Incentive Overlay Sample Scenarios (Next two slides) Base zone district (C-MX-8, I-MX-8, etc.) allows 8 stories (sample scenario 1) Scenario 1 only develops to the maximum 8-story height allowed by the base zone district When building to the base zone district height, no special requirements apply (citywide linkage fee formulas are used) Zoning overlay allows 16 story incentive height (used in sample scenario 2) Sample scenario 2 used the incentive to develop to the maximum 16 story height allowed by the overlay Normal citywide affordable housing requirements apply to all stories Additional requirements (4 times the citywide formula) apply to stories above the base height ( incentive stories 9-16)

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Sample Scenario 1: Develop to Base Height Fee Option Unit Option Fee Option Unit Option Community Use Option 8 Story Residential Project Total floor area (stories 1-8): 240,000sf Note: the height incentive (to develop above the 8-story base height) is not used in this scenario. Citywide Fee: $1.50 1 x 240,000 2 = $360,000 Total Fee (same as citywide): = $360,000 Citywide Req.: 0.0168 3 x (240,000 2 /1,000) = 4 units Total Requirement (same as citywide) = 4 units Citywide Fee: $1.70 4 x 240,000 2 = $408,000 Total Fee: (same as citywide) = $408,500 8 Story Commercial Project Total floor area (stories 1-8): 240,000sf Note: the height incentive (to develop above the 5-story base height) is not used in this scenario. Citywide Req.: 0.0228 5 x (240,000 2 /1,000) = 5 units Total Requirement (same as citywide) = 5 units This Scenario does not use a height incentive Footnotes: No community-serving use option. Only commercial development using incentive height has option for community-serving uses (see next slide). 1. Citywide linkage fee for residential 2. Square footage of the 8-story building 3. Citywide linkage fee residential build alternative formula (unit fractions above.5 rounded to next whole unit) 4. Citywide linkage fee for commercial 5. Citywide linkage fee commercial build alternative formula (unit fractions above.5 rounded to next whole unit)

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Sample Scenario 2: Develop to Incentive Height A. Fee Option B. Unit Option A. Fee Option B. Unit Option C. Community Use Option 16 Story Residential Project Base floor area (stories 1-8): 240,000sf Incentive floor area (stories 9-16): 240,000sf Total floor area (stories 1-16): 480,000sf No fee option for residential development. Development using incentive height would have to built units on site or within height incentive area. Citywide Req.: 0.0168 1 x (480,000 2 /1,000) = 8 units Incentive Req.: 0.0672 3 x (240,000 4 /1,000) = 16 units Total Requirement (citywide + incentive) = 24 units Footnotes: 16 Story Commercial Project Base floor area (stories 1-8): 240,000sf Incentive floor area (stories 9-16): 240,000sf Total floor area (stories 1-16): 480,000sf 1. Citywide linkage fee residential build alternative formula 2. Square footage of the entire 16-story building 3. Citywide linkage fee residential build alternative formula multiplied by 4 (applied to incentive stories ) 4. Square footage contained in the incentive stories (stories 9-16) 5. Citywide linkage fee for commercial Citywide Fee: $1.70 5 x 480,000 2 = $816,000 Incentive Fee: $6.80 6 x 240,000 4 = $1,632,000 Total Fee: (citywide + incentive) = $2,448,000 Citywide Req.: 0.0228 7 x (480,000 2 /1,000) = 11 units Incentive Req.: 0.0912 8 x (240,000 4 /1,000) = 22 units Total Requirement (citywide + incentive) = 33 units Pay normal $816,000 9 citywide fee and negotiate community benefits agreement (CBA) to provide community-serving uses in lieu of paying $1,632,000 10 incentive fee (CBA should provide approx. same value as waived incentive fee) 6. Citywide linkage fee for commercial multiplied by 4 7. Citywide linkage fee commercial build alternative formula 8. Citywide linkage fee commercial build alternative formula multiplied by four (applied to incentive stories ) 9. Citywide linkage fee for the entire 16-story building 10. Additional fee generated by the incentive stories (stories 9-16)

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Residential Affordability Requirements 10 Units must be affordable to households earning below 80% Area Median Income Affordable units under the Develop to Base Height scenario must be onsite or within ¼ mile of original development Affordable units under the Develop to Incentive Height scenario must be provided within the incentive height overlay area Option to partner with another builder to provide units offsite Mix and size of affordable units must match market rate units Plan to provide affordable units can cover more than one parcel, BUT must cover specific parcels, outline the specific number of units provided, and include timeline for development of those units

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Community-serving Use Agreement 11 Agreement with Denver Office of Economic Development (OED) Considered as a Pilot Program Reviewed for effectiveness after approximately two years OED will prepare an annual report for City Council Meets Special Incentive Requirements Only Can meet incentive requirements generated by non-residential uses above the base height Citywide affordable housing linkage fee will apply to all floors of building as it would elsewhere in the city Voluntary Option to pay fee or build units to meet incentive requirements instead Significant Must provide similar value to fee or units that would have otherwise been required Intended to generate community-serving uses rather than recognize those that might otherwise be provided

12 38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Initial Community-serving Use List Arts Studios Supplies Maker space Art school/trades education Goods Groceries Pharmacies Services Child care Medical Community kitchens Civic Functions Non-profits OED will prepare an annual community serving retail and services gaps list, with likely space needs and required rent reduction level for sustainability

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Community-serving Use Steps 13 Step Dept. Timing Site Development Plan Review CPD On Application Developer Requests to Participate in Program Negotiation of Benefits and Terms (uses, timing, square footage) Review of Community Benefits Agreement (CBA) by OED/CPD/Council Office Panel OED OED OED During SDP Review/Prior to Building Permits CBA Contract Signed and Executed OED Prior to Building Permits Approval of Building Permits CPD

14 38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Community-serving Use Terms Allowed Use Square Footage Varies depending on use Based on calculated benefits Location In building/area Duration of Agreement 20 year standard term Rent Level Reduction from market rate Allowable fees Contingency Requirement to re-lease to an approved use if vacancy exists Security interest for performance Hardship release to pay fee (with discount for previous performance)

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Implementation Map Amendments (Rezoning) 15 Legislative Rezoning to Apply Overlay Will apply to all properties in the height amendment area Proposed Legislative Rezoning to Synch Base Zone Districts to Plan Guidance Where Needed Potential to opt-out (note that opting out would make it impossible to use incentive height) Legislative Rezoning Will Occur at Same Time as Text Amendments to Apply Overlay Anticipated adoption in late 2017

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Implementation Base Zone District Status 1. Existing Zoning Matches Base Height or is Taller Ready to go (no rezoning needed) 2. Existing Zoning is Lower Than Plan Base Height Will propose legislative up-zoning to base height (with opt out possibility) 3. Existing Zoning is Not a Standard Height-based District Will propose legislative rezoning (with opt out possibility) Review potential use issues

Height Incentive Overlay: Implementation

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Implementation Station Area Example Existing Zoning Near Station

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Implementation Station Area Example Existing Zoning That Does Not Match Base Height

38 th & Blake Incentive Height Overlay Implementation Station Area Example Possible Zone Districts That Would Match Plan Base Height

RiNo Design Overlay

RiNo Design Overlay Adjusts Base Zone District Standards Siting Build-to/Setbacks Parking Location, Access & Landscaping Design Elements Volumetric Mass Reduction First Floor Height Structured Parking Design Street Level Activation Transparency Pedestrian Access Street Level Active Uses Minimum Parking Requirements

RiNo Design Overlay Key Impacts Greater Impact on Projects in I-MX Districts No use of Industrial building form Higher build-to % Higher transparency %, especially on side streets Greater Impacts on Large Projects Zone lot > 150 in width or 18,750 sf Volumetric mass reduction Street level active use

RiNo Design Overlay Volumetric Mass Reduction Applies Only to Large Zone Lots Zone lot > 150 in width or 18,750 sf 3 standard platted lots Uses % Reductions Based on Gross Zone Lot Area Different than an upper-story setback % of volume must be reduced Mass Reduction Must Face Public Realm Primary or Side Street River Private Open Space

RiNo Design Overlay Volumetric Mass Reduction Floors 1-8 10% reduction Floors 9-max. 30% reduction Open Space Alternative Provide 15%-20% Private Open Space at Street Level in lieu of mass reduction Open to the public Open to the sky Fully visible from a Primary Street

RiNo Design Overlay Volumetric Mass Reduction

RiNo Design Overlay Street Level Uses Applies Only to Large Zone Lots Zone lot > 150 in width or 18,750 sf 3 standard platted lots Uses Not Allowed on 50% of Primary Street Frontage Parking Industrial Residential

RiNo Design Overlay Build-to/Setbacks Residential Primary Street Setback: Min. 7 Primary Street (% - within min./max.): 70% - 7 /20 All Others Primary Street Setback: Min. 0 Primary Street (% - within min./max.): 70% - 0 /15 Note: Build-to range more permissive than C-MX.

RiNo Design Overlay Other Highlights Street Level Height Min. 14 Structured Parking Design Must be screened or wrapped above street level Surface Parking Location/Design Not between building and primary or side street Heightened landscaping Vehicular Parking Minimums No min. parking requirement within ½ mile of transit

Q & A / Discussion 30