Verdiroc Development Corp.

Similar documents
Noise Feasibility Study Proposed Redevelopment of Glen Abbey Golf Club Oakville, Ontario

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT ST. LAURENT BOULEVARD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TIA SCOPING FORM. Prepared for:

FINAL NOISE STUDY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM ADDENDUM

RM-11 and RM-11N Districts Schedule

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

RE: Transportation Overview Youth Services Bureau Housing First Hub for Youth 2887 Riverside Drive

The Corporation of The Town of Richmond Hill. Schedule of Conditions. Draft Plan of Subdivision. File 19T(R)-16002

Omnibus Zoning Amendment (FILE # D ) Proposals

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 2017

RM-8 and RM-8N Districts Schedule

RM-7, RM-7N and RM-7AN Districts Schedules

C-2 District Schedule

York Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

STAFF REPORT. December 18, Etobicoke Community Council. Director, Community Planning, West District

1133 West Georgia Street By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

900 ALBERT STREET PLANNING RATIONALE ADDENDUM NO. 2

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. AVALON WEST STAGE 4 PLANNING RATIONALE. July Prepared for:

Housing Issues Report Shoreline Towers Inc. Proposal 2313 & 2323 Lake Shore Boulevard West. Prepared by PMG Planning Consultants November 18, 2014

Acting Chief Planner & Executive Director, City Planning Division

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

1. Only items to which the Village has title to and meet the definition of the following will be recorded a tangible capital asset.

H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

RM-1 and RM-1N Districts Schedule

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

CITY OF TYLER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF COMMENTS

M:\2016\116063\DATA\APPLICATIONS\SITE PLAN\PLANNING ADDENDUM\PLANNING BRIEF WATERFORD.DOCX.PAGE 1

5. That the Owner shall agree that all development Blocks shown within the Draft Plan will be connected to full municipal services.

West Hastings Street By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

Rawlinson House, Lewisham, London SE13 5EL

the conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development.

TOWN OF WHITBY REPORT RECOMMENDATION REPORT

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

All technical references have been provided in the Appendix.

Section 9.5. Design of Areas, Spaces and Doorways

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control

Part 3 Specific Use Provisions (Sections 80-95)

Date: March 16, Jake Centers ERD, LLC P.O. Box 1610 Eagle, ID Elevation Ridge Subdivision (SUB & PUD ) Street Address

RÉGION D OTTAWA-CARLETON

RM-10 and RM-10N Districts Schedule

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

Zoning By-law and Zoning By-law Amendments to Permit Short-term Rentals

VENUE ALE A ARKD 453 P

3445 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

]y]q EFFECT ON URBAN WORKS RESERVE FUND AND DEVELOPMENT CHARGES RESERVE FUNDS' $ 1,043,638

Direct Control District No. 1 (DCD1) for The South Downtown

APARTMENT BUILDING 322 GARDNER STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: John Howard Society of Ottawa.

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

PLANNING RATIONALE. Site Conditions and Surrounding Context. June 25, 2013

970 Burrard Street By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

Part 3 Specific Use Provisions (Sections 79-99) (By-law )

68 Marine Parade Drive Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications Lifting of the Holding (H) Symbol

50+54 BELL STREET NORTH

PART 9: RURAL AREA ZONING DISTRICTS

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Policy and Standards for Public Local Residential Streets And Private Streets

Planning Rationale. 224 Cooper Street

40 Moccasin Trail and 50 Green Belt Drive - OMB

RT-11 and RT-11N Districts Schedules

M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE

Bowie Marketplace Residential Detailed Site Plan Statement of Justification January 13, 2017 Revised February 2, 1017

836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Niagara St Zoning Amendment Application Supplementary Report Rental Housing

PINE CANYON PD ZONING REGULATIONS

Cherokee Webster Development, LP. City of Webster, Texas Planned Development No. 3. Proposed Revision No. 4

200 St. Clair Ave W - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

2306 St. Clair Avenue West Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division

RM-5, RM-5A, RM-5B, RM-5C and RM-5D Districts Schedule

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017

E. Maintain and preserve the character of the community and residential neighborhoods; and

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

City Council Agenda Item #14_ Meeting of Oct. 8, Concept plan for Marsh Run Two Redevelopment at and Wayzata Blvd.

Ashcroft Homes Trim Road Development Planning Rationale

City of Vancouver Zoning and Development By-law Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability Department

Zoning St. Laurent Boulevard Zonage , boulevard St. Laurent. Recommendations

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 11, 2012

Planning Commission Report

ZONING AMENDMENT, SUBDIVISION & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 16, 2006

U-HAUL OF ORLANDO AN NEXATION

3636 Bathurst Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

ARTICLE (SM) SURFACE MINING ZONE. 2. To allow the development and use of mineral and aggregate resources;

RM 4 and RM 4N Districts Schedule

APES 225 Valuation Services

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: October 5, 2015

ST.LAURENT BOULEVARD PLANNING RATIONALE FOR ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT APPLICATION ADDENDUM # 1

Initial Subdivision Applications Shall Include the Following:

Staff Report. Recommendations: Background:

CD-1 (264) 101 Terminal Avenue By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

APPLICATION OF SECTION 3.8 OF THE 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE FOR: BARRIER-FREE AUDIT OF SENECA COLLEGE NEWNHAM CAMPUS TORONTO, ONTARIO

Transcription:

Verdiroc Development Corp. Noise Impact Assessment Type of Document Issued for Review Project Name 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number DME-2917 Prepared By: Karl Repka, P.Eng exp Services Inc. 100-2650 Queensview Drive Ottawa, ON K2B 8H6 Canada Date Submitted March 2013

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Legal Notification This report was prepared by exp Services Inc. for the account of Verdiroc Development Corp. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions to be made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Exp Services Inc. accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this project.

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction... 1 2 References... 1 3 Regulatory Requirements... 3 3.1 Sound Level Criteria... 3 3.2 Attenuation Requirements... 3 4 Analysis and Procedure... 5 4.1 Noise Sources... 5 4.2 Vehicular Traffic Noise... 5 4.3 Noise Level Calculations... 6 4.4 Summary of Results... 8 5 Noise Control Measures... 9 5.1 Outdoor Measures... 9 5.2 Indoor Measures... 9 6 Warning Clauses... 9 7 Conclusions and Recommendations... 10 List of Appendices Appendix A Noise Figure Appendix B Traffic Counts and Transportation Master Plan Road Network Appendix C STAMSON Output List of Figures Page Figure 1: Overall Site Location Plan... 2 i

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 1 Introduction Verdiroc Development Corp has retained exp Services Inc. to undertake a noise impact assessment in support of a site plan amendment for a proposed low-rise condominium development located at 1240-1244 Donald Street in the City of Ottawa. The site location is shown on a key plan on Figure 1. The subject condo flats are within 100m of a collector roadway and therefore require the completion of a noise impact study. This study was carried out in accordance with the Ontario Ministry of the Environment (MOE) and the City of Ottawa Noise Control Guidelines. This report addresses concerns with respect to anticipated noise levels at the proposed housing units resulting from traffic noise. The findings of the study will address noise levels, and recommend noise abatement measures that may be required to achieve acceptable noise levels. 2 References A summary of the documents that were referenced during the preparation of this reports include the following: Ontario Ministry of the Environment publication LU-131, Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning, and accompanying Annex, dated October 1997. Ontario Ministry of the Environment publication NPC-205, Sound Level Limits for Stationary Sources in Class 1 & 2 Areas (Urban). City of Ottawa Transportation Master Plan. City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines, May 10, 2006. Building Practice Note (BPN 56), Controlling Sound Transmission into Buildings, National Research Council Canada, dated Sept 1985. Donald Street Development, Transportation Brief, IBI Group, dated January 2010. 1

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 3 Regulatory Requirements 3.1 Sound Level Criteria Ministry of the Environment (MOE) requirements and the City of Ottawa Guidelines place limitations on indoor and outdoor sound levels from road traffic. These maximum acceptable noise levels are summarized in Table 3-1 below. Table 3-1: City of Ottawa Indoor and Outdoor Noise Level Criteria Location & Time Period Equivalent Sound Level (Leq) (dba) Sound Level at Plane of Window (POW) (dba) Indoors Sleeping quarters (Nightime 23:00 to 07:00) 40 50 Living / Dining areas (Daytime 07:00 to 23:00) 45 55 Outdoors Outdoor Living Areas (Daytime 07:00 to 23:00) 55 (References: City of Ottawa Table 1.6, City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines and Section 5.2 of Noise Assessment Criteria in Land Use Planning, MOE, 1997) It should be noted that the Leq measured at the POW is the main criteria used to evaluate indoor sound levels. Normal housing construction is sufficient to attenuate noise to acceptable indoor levels (i.e. 40 dba at night and 45 dba during the day) if the night-time sound level at the plane of window (POW) wall is within acceptable levels. 3.2 Attenuation Requirements Sound levels often exceed the recommended limits noted in Table 3-1 above. The following tables summarize the noise abatement measures and warning clause requirements that must be implemented when the predicted noise levels exceed the criteria. 3

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Table 3-2: Outdoor, Ventilation and Warning Clause Requirements for Road Noise Assessment Location Sound Level (time as noted) Ventilation Requirements Outdoor Control Measures Warning Clause 1 Requirements Daytime (Leq 16) Less than or equal to 55 dba N/A None Required Not Required Outdoor Living Area (OLA) Daytime (Leq 16) Greater than 55 dba to less than or equal to 60 dba Daytime (Leq 16) Greater than 60 dba N/A N/A Barriers may not be required but should be considered Barrier Required Type A required if Leq exceeds 55 dba Type B required if Leq exceeds 55 dba Daytime (Leq 16) Less than or equal to 55 dba None Required N/A Not Required Plane of Living Room Window Daytime (Leq 16) Greater than 55 dba to less than or equal to 65 dba Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning N/A Type C Required Daytime (Leq 16) Greater than 65 dba Central air conditioning N/A Type D Required Plane of Bedroom Window Night-time (Leq 8) Greater than 50 dba to less than or equal to 60 dba Night-time (Leq 8) Greater than 60 dba Forced air heating with provision for central air conditioning Central air conditioning N/A N/A Type C Required Type D Required (Reference City of Ottawa Table 1.10: City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines) 1 Refer to Section 8 for specific wording of warning clauses 4

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Table 3-3: Building Component Requirements for Road Noise Assessment Location Plane of Living Room Window Plane of Bedroom Window Equivalent Sound Level (time as noted) Leq 16 Less than or equal to 65 dba Leq 16 Greater than 65 dba Leq 8 Less than or equal to 60 dba Leq 8 Greater than 60 dba Building Component Requirements Building must be compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria Building must be compliant with the Ontario Building Code Building components (walls, windows, etc.) must be designed to achieve indoor sound level criteria (Reference City of Ottawa Table 1.8: City of Ottawa Environmental Noise Control Guidelines) 4 Analysis and Procedure 4.1 Noise Sources The proposed development will be subjected to noise generated from vehicular traffic travelling along surrounding roads. Donald Street and St. Laurent Boulevard are the only collector and arterial streets in close proximity to the development. However, St. Laurent Boulevard is approximately 265m away from the closest edge of the proposed Condo Flats and is not modelled as a noise source. Therefore, Donald Street is the only noise source to be considered. No other sources of noise such as surface transportation, aircraft or stationary sources are expected. 4.2 Vehicular Traffic Noise Traffic information used for this study was obtained from the review of existing roadway conditions and reference to the City of Ottawa s Noise Control Guidelines. The Annual Average Day Trips for Donald Street are based on actual traffic count information provided by the City for August 4, 2010. An annual growth allowance of 1% per annum was applied for 3 years to calculate the current AADT for use in the model. This traffic growth allowance is consistent with traffic growth assumed in the Donald Street Development Transportation Brief, prepared by IBI Group, January 2010. Noise levels were calculated based on the noise emanating from Donald Street modeled as two segments. Traffic data demonstrated that the westbound lane carried approximately 68% of the daily traffic, however the AADT has been split evenly between the two lanes. Because the Westbound lane is the furthest lane from the proposed flats, this is a conservative approach to modelling the noise generated on Donald Street. Road and traffic parameters used in the analysis are summarized in Table 4-1 below. 5

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Table 4-1: Traffic and Road Parameters (AADT Traffic Volumes) Traffic Parameters Donald Street R.O.W. WIDTH (m) 26 Roadway Classification A.A.D.T. (veh/day) 2-Lane Major Collector 9816 (4906/lane) POSTED SPEED LIMIT (km/hr) 50 4.3 Noise Level Calculations Day/night split (%) 92 / 8 Medium trucks (%) 7 Heavy trucks (%) 5 Calculations for roadway noise levels were completed using the Ministry of the Environment STAMSON 5.02" computer software program. In order to establish the projected noise levels affecting the site, the following assumptions were made: Receiver locations: For OLA s levels: 3.0m from facade and 1.5m above ground. It is assumed that the OLA is at the rear of the house. For POW s levels: 1 st storey windows located 1.5m above ground, 2 nd storey windows located 3.4m above ground, 3 rd storey windows located 6.5m above ground, and 4 th storey windows located 9.5m above ground. The predicted noise levels for the daytime and night-time periods were calculated for the receivers at the following locations as shown on Figure 2 and as described in Table 4-2: 6

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Table 4-2 - Location of Receiver Receiver Location Receiver Height Distance to Donald Street Westbound Lane Eastbound Lane R1 Ground Floor POW 1.5 m 22.1 m 16.0 m R1 Second Floor POW 3.4 m 22.1 m 16.0 m R1 Third Floor POW 6.5 m 22.1 m 16.0 m R1 Fourth Floor POW 9.5 m 22.1 m 16.0 m R2 OLA 1.5 m 39.7 m 33.6 m R3 Ground Floor POW 1.5 m 37.8 m 31.7 m R3 Fourth Floor POW 9.5 m 37.8 m 31.7 m R4 OLA 1.5 m 41.6 m 35.5 m R5 Ground Floor POW 1.5 m 21.5 m 15.4 m R5 Second Floor POW 3.4 m 21.5 m 15.4 m R5 Third Floor POW 6.5 m 21.5 m 15.4 m R5 Fourth Floor POW 9.5 m 21.5 m 15.4 m R6 Ground Floor POW 1.5 m 29.7 m 23.6m R6 Fourth Floor POW 9.5 m 29.7 m 23.6m 7

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Input Details: Truck traffic on all streets and roadways consists of 5% heavy trucks, 7% medium trucks, based on City of Ottawa requirements. The Day/Night split used for roadways and freeways was 92% and 8% as per city requirements. Intermediate surfaces between the source and receiver locations are assessed as an absorptive ground surface. Therefore noise levels were assessed for all floors. Topography was assessed as flat/gentle slope. For outdoor living areas, the condo buildings were modeled as a 10.5m high (which is the approximate height excluding roof) noise barrier located along the rear wall of the building. Road pavement and road gradient was assessed as typical asphalt or concrete and flat grade. 4.4 Summary of Results A summary of predicted noise levels for various assessment locations is summarized below in Table 4-3. The location of each receiver is shown on Figure 2, included in Appendix A. Detailed results and output files from STAMSON are contained in Appendix C. Highlighted rows indicate that sound levels exceed acceptable limits. Assessment Location Table 4-3: Summary of Noise Levels Receiver Height above Ground Level (m) Combined Equivalent Noise Level Leq (dba) Day Time (7:00 23:00) Night Time (23:00 7:00) R1 (ground floor) POW 1.5 63.84 56.20 R1 (second floor) POW 3.4 63.98 56.34 R1 (third floor) POW 6.5 64.23 56.58 R1 (fourth floor) POW 9.5 64.47 56.83 R2 OLA 1.5 50.46 n/a R3 (ground floor)* POW 1.5 44.14 36.50 R3 (fourth floor)* POW 9.5 48.07 40.42 R4 OLA 1.5 50.81 n/a R5 (ground floor) POW 1.5 64.09 56.44 R5 (second floor) POW 3.4 64.22 56.58 R5 (third floor) POW 6.5 64.45 56.81 R5 (fourth floor) POW 9.5 64.68 57.04 R6 (ground floor) POW 1.5 58.29 50.65 R6 (fourth floor) POW 9.5 59.30 51.65 *R3 is evaluated 1m from POW to allow the condo building to be modelled as a 10.5m high wall. 8

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 5 Noise Control Measures 5.1 Outdoor Measures The noise levels at receivers R2, and R4 are representative of the worst case scenarios for outdoor living areas of all units in the condo flats. Because the OLA noise levels at these receivers are less than Leq 55dBA, there is no attenuation or warning clause requirements for outdoor living areas of any unit of the Condo Flats. 5.2 Indoor Measures The results at receivers R1 and R5 predict that the noise levels on the north side of the proposed units will exceed the indoor sound level requirements during daytime and night-time hours for all four floors. The daytime sound levels are within the 55 dba to 65 dba range and the night time sound levels are in the range between 50 dba and 60 dba. Therefore, a Type C warning clause will be required within the purchase and sale agreements for these units. Forced air heating and the provision for future installation of central air conditioning will also be required. Adherence to the Ontario Building Code (OBC) will ensure that adequate noise attenuation is provided for indoor noise levels. The results at receiver R6 show that the predicted noise levels for the east and west sides of proposed units exceed the indoor sound level requirement of 55 dba during day time hours for all four floors of the end units in each condo building. The day time indoor sound levels along these end units is the the range of 55 dba to 65 dba. Therefore, the Type C warning clause will be required within the purchase and sale agreement for these units. Forced air heating with the provision for future installation of central air conditioning as required above is sufficient for all units with east and west facing walls. Adherence to the OBC will ensure that adequate noise attenuation is provided by the building components. The results at receiver R3 show that the predicted indoor noise levels at the POW along the south side of the proposed condo units are within an acceptable range during day and night time hours. 6 Warning Clauses The suggested wording of the warning clause for residential lots is as follows: Type A: Purchasers/Tenants are advised that sound levels due to increasing road traffic may occasionally interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality s and the Ministry of Environment s noise criteria. Type B: Purchasers/Tenants are advised that despite the inclusion of noise control features in the development and within the building units, sound levels due to increasing road traffic may on occasions interfere with some activities of the dwelling occupants as the sound levels exceed the Municipality s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Type C: This dwelling unit is fitted with a forced air duct heating system and the fan, ducts etc. are sized to accommodate the installation of a central air conditioning system. If desired by the owner/occupant to install central air conditioning, the outdoor unit must be located in a noise insensitive location, in conformity with the zoning by-laws of the City of Ottawa. The final installation shall meet the Ministry of Environment criteria in Publication NPC-216. 9

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Type D: This dwelling unit has been supplied with a central air conditioning system which will allow windows and exterior door to remain closed, thereby ensuring that the indoor sound levels are within the Municipality s and the Ministry of the Environment s noise criteria. Where any of the above warning clauses are to be included in the offer of Purchase and Sale, the following clause is also to be included: The Transferee covenants with the Transfer or that the above clause, verbatim, shall be included in all subsequent agreements of Purchase and Sale and Deeds conveying the lands described herein, which covenant shall run with the said lands and is for the benefit of subsequent owners of the said lands and the owner of the adjacent road 7 Conclusions and Recommendations The impact of traffic noise from Donald Street on the proposed condo flat units will require a Type C warning clause and forced air heating with the provision for future installation of central air conditioning. Building components must adhere to the OBC to ensure that adequate noise attenuation is provided to indoor living areas. Noise levels at the outdoor living areas (south side) of the condo flats are within acceptable limits. No noise barriers or warning clauses are required for the outdoor living areas of any unit of the Condo Flats. 10

Appendix A Noise Figure Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013

Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013 Appendix B Traffic Counts and Transportation Master Plan Road Network

Appendix C STAMSON Output Client: Verdiroc Development Corp. Project Name: 1240-1244 Donald Street Condo Flats Project Number: DME-2917 Date: March 2013