Policy Issues Regarding a Potential Non-Residential Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Program for Broward County

Similar documents
Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

CITY OF PETALUMA HOUSING PROGRAM REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FY

[2015 INCENTIVE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION REPORT] STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)

SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. THE CITY OF BURBANK, a municipal corporation

Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Program Procedural Manual

Florida Housing Finance Corporation Qualified Allocation Plan Low Income Housing Tax Credits Program

SECTION I AMENDMENT REPORT BROWARD COUNTY LAND USE PLAN TEXT PROPOSED AMENDMENT PCT BrowardNext Corrective Amendments RECOMMENDATIONS/ACTIONS

1 H. 4702, 190th Gen. Ct (Mass. 2018). 2 H. 4297, 190th Gen. Ct (Mass. 2018).

Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Review of Recommendations. Planning and Development Department Community Development Division March 10, 2015

CITY OF BELMONT INCLUSIONARY ZONING AND IMPACT FEES

Urban Mixed Use (UMU) Zoning District

Subject: Housing and Cost Estimates for the 421-a Extended Affordability Benefits Program

Community Revitalization Efforts 2016 Thresholds and Scoring Criteria

METRO JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: POLICY Updated January 2017

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Consultant Team. Today s Meeting 5/7/2015. San Mateo County Multi City Nexus and Feasibility Studies

An ordinance adding Section and amending Section of the Los Angeles Municipal Code to establish an Affordable Housing Linkage Fee.

Atascadero Community Redevelopment Agency Staff Report Executive Director

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

CITY OF OAKLAND COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Housing Commission Report

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

INCLUSIONARY ZONING GUIDELINES FOR CITIES & TOWNS. Prepared for the Massachusetts Housing Partnership Fund By Edith M. Netter, Esq.

Subpart A - GENERAL ORDINANCES Chapter 66 - TAXATION ARTICLE V. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION

HOUSING ELEMENT. 3. group and foster home construction. 1. increase the supply of new affordable housing with: a regional housing trust fund;

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

CHAPTER 15: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 437

DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report

Green, Mid-Market Neighborhood Development

OAKLAND CITY COUNCIL

EXHIBIT E LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

BILL H.3653: An Act Financing the Production and Preservation of Housing for Low and Moderate Income Residents

CHDO Definition. Self-Government. The CHDO must be free of external controls, either from public or for-profit interests.

PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY. September 10, 2013 [ ] Consent [X] Regular [ ] Ordinance [ ] Public Hearing

Requests for Qualifications

In v e n t o ry a n d An a ly s i s o f Pl a n n i n g Co m m i s s i o n La n d Development

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

CITY OF OAKLAND IMPACT FEE ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS AND MANUAL

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

Development Charges Update

2019 Development Charges By-law Update Project Plan

Oregon, Brownfields, and the Land Bank and Tax Abatement Authorities. How Does It All Work And Why Cities and Counties Should Be Interested

BUSINESS INCENTIVES POLICY June 17, 2008

July 1, 2013 thru September 30, 2013 Performance Report

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

ARTICLE 1.18 AFFORDABLE HOUSING LINKAGE FEE

Public Review Draft. January 2007

Town of Limon Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 4 HOUSING. Limon Housing Authority Affordable Housing

Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) 101: Public Housing Conversions. US Department of Housing & Urban Development May 14, 2018

ARCH Strategic Planning Workshops March May 2007

Broward County Consolidated Communications Implementation Advisory Board

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2014 the City Council of the City of Redwood City

RESOLUTION NO

January 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report

City of Bellingham Redevelopment Incentive Recommendations at a Glance

CITY OF OAKLAND SUPPLEMENTAL FORM AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 287

Combining the Historic Tax Credit with Other Tax Credits (New Markets) February 5, 2009

Impact Fee Reductions as Incentives. How Do They Work?

Date: January 9, Strategic Housing Committee. IZ Work Group. Legacy Homes Program

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

CITY OF BELMONT AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAMS

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING

TRANSPORTATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPACT FEES

M EMORANDUM. Attachment 7. Steve Buckley and Margot Ernst, City of Walnut Creek. Darin Smith and Michael Nimon, EPS

City of Winnipeg Housing Policy Implementation Plan

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN Responses to Questionnaire for HUD s Initiative on Removal of Regulatory Barriers: May 11, 2007 Status

POLK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION

Risk Mitigation Fund Policy

HOME FACTS NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS HOME PRODUCTION PROGRAM

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Planning Commission February 12, 2015

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in Policy and Finance Committee Report 7, which was considered by City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 26, 2005.

Affordable Housing: Housing that does not cost more than 30% of an individual or family s total income to rent or own.

Agenda Re~oort PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO INCLUSIONARY IN-LIEU FEE RATES

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 16, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. 35. Public Hearing [t(" Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda D

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

Developing a Comprehensive Plan. New York State Department of State Office of Coastal, Local Government & Community Sustainability

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

India: Capacity Building for Commercial Bank Lending for Solar Energy Projects

City of Salinas Nexus Studies Overview and Summary February 2016

CITY OF -S. SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: February 24, 2016 SUPPORT FOR THE 2017 MOVING TO WORK ANNUAL PLAN

CHAPTER 11: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

Disposals of land or improvements in School district No. 42 will be guided by the following principles.

PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE HOUSING INIITATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) PROGRAM LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN (LHAP) FISCAL YEARS ,

City of Puyallup. Parks Impact Fee Study

City of Sebastopol Housing Subcommittee HOUSING ACTION PLAN SURVEY RESULTS From May 22, 2016 Meeting

El Cerrito Affordable Housing Strategy City Council Presentation August 15, 2017

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA. O Kji ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR ARTS DISTRICT LOS ANGELES BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PROPERTY BASED)

City of Golden Council Memorandum

OVERVIEW OF IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE

Transcription:

Policy Issues Regarding a Potential Non-Residential Affordable Housing Linkage Fee Program for Broward County Prepared by Broward County Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department November 24, 2015 BACKGROUND In 2007, Broward County retained the Metropolitan Center at Florida International University (FIU) to conduct a Housing Linkage Fee Nexus Analysis for Broward County. The analysis was submitted to the County on October 29, 2007, and determined the impacts of non-residential (e.g. retail, commercial, office) development on demand for affordable housing in Broward County. The premise of a housing linkage fee concept is that new non-residential (e.g. commercial) development will generate a range of occupations and wage rates that will, in turn, create the demand for new housing at various affordability levels. On April 15, 2008, the County Commission held an Affordable Housing Workshop, and the Commission s consensus was for staff to further pursue the development of a housing linkage fee program for Broward County. In this regard, County staff was directed to seek input from interested parties on key policy issues related to a housing linkage fee and also update the data and analysis from the FIU Study. In September, 2008, County staff issued a document entitled Policy Issues Regarding a Potential Housing Linkage Fee Program for Broward County, which included staff recommendations for such a program concerning fee levels, exemptions/waivers, use of revenues, municipal linkage fee programs, and timing of fee assessments. However, staff also recommended that the linkage fee not proceed at that time due to current economic conditions. Staff recommended that consideration of the fee be renewed when economic conditions are more favorable. On October 15, 2013, the Broward County Commission held a workshop on affordable housing and indicated a consensus to revisit the housing linkage fee program for Broward County. On June 24, 2014, the County Commission retained the Metropolitan Center at FIU to update to the Broward County Housing Linkage Fee Nexus Study prepared in 2007 to establish the current nexus costs per square foot for various employment categories for the purpose of considering the establishment of a countywide affordable housing linkage fee for new nonresidential development. On January 30, 2015, the FIU report was accepted by Broward County staff. Please see Exhibit 1. The updated data and analysis from the FIU study establishes the current nexus costs per square foot for various employment categories. Please see Table 3.9: Nexus Costs per Square Foot, on page 34 of Exhibit 1.

Page 2 On May 13, 2015, staff held a public workshop to solicit input from municipalities, the development community, affordable housing proponents, and other affected and interested stakeholders. Approximately 70 persons attended representing a range of viewpoints and expertise. At the workshop, a status of housing affordability in Broward County was presented by MC/FIU staff. County staff also presented a review of the Housing Linkage Fee Study and solicited feedback concerning linkage fee implementation issues, including potential fee levels, fee waivers, fee distribution and use, and timing of assessments. Examples of estimated total costs for four development scenarios (hotel, retail, 1 story warehouse, office) were also presented for information and discussion. The topics of questions and comments expressed at the workshop included exemptions for brownfield redevelopment and mixed use development, avoiding concentrations of affordable housing, potential fee thresholds, potential economic impacts, including those on small businesses, focusing on rental housing, and alternative funding sources. At this time, County staff is of the opinion that the rational nexus to consider the establishment of a countywide affordable housing linkage fee has been provided. In addition, County staff is of the opinion that the analysis previously completed by County staff in 2008 regarding policy issues remains relevant and may be used to identify updated recommendations. In this light, following are items concerning implementation of a countywide affordable housing linkage fee program. The 2007 Linkage Fee Study and the 2008 County staff issued document entitled Policy Issues Regarding a Potential Housing Linkage Fee Program for Broward County is available upon request. IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES Fee Levels Based on the 2008 staff report, two fee categories were considered, $1.00 per square foot for retail and office (including restaurants) and $0.50 per square foot for other non-residential. During the staff-level workshop on May 13, 2015, the ranges below were presented for discussion for the previously discussed categories: Retail and Office (including restaurants) Other non-residential Between $1.00 and $5.00 per square foot Between $0.50 and $2.50 per square foot 2015 Update: The 2008 County staff paper recommended $1.00 per square foot for retail and office (Including restaurants) and $0.50 per square foot for other non-residential uses. A justification for recommending a higher fee at this time would be for better consistency with the updated 2014 nexus costs per square foot, which range from $224.45 to $883.76 per square foot, which are substantially increased compared to the

Page 3 2007 nexus costs which ranged from $24.43 to $97.10 per square foot. According to MC/FIU, which prepared the updated 2014 rational nexus analysis, the significant changes in employment/household demand numbers are due to the fact that the study update was able to access and analyze actual commercial properties with precise data (as opposed to national standards) from the Broward County Property Appraiser combined with ES-202 employment data. It is estimated that if fees of $5.00 per square foot for retail and office and $2.50 for other non-residential had been in effect during 2014, over $10 million would have been collected for affordable housing programs. 2015 County EPGM Recommendation: Due to the updated nexus costs per square foot, which range from $224.45 to $883.76 per square foot, which are substantially increased as compared to the 2007 nexus costs which ranged from $24.43 to $97.10 per square foot, EPGM staff recommends that one rate at $1.00 per square foot be established for all non-residential categories. If the $1.00 per square foot rate had been applied in 2014, it is estimated that over $2 million would have been collected by the County. Exemptions/Waivers In 2008, Staff considered the following exemptions/waivers: Public projects/facilities (including public schools) Houses of worship Not-for-profits Any municipality with its own linkage fee program in effect prior to the adoption of the County s program 2015 Update: Staff notes that the County Attorney s Office has expressed concern about exempting some types of development from an affordable housing fee. Waiver of fees is an option, subject to waived project fees being covered via alternative County funding sources. 2015 County EPGM Recommendation: EPGM staff recommends that waivers be established for all the above listed development types, and that municipalities may be exempted only if they have adopted their own linkage fee program which has been demonstrated to have fee levels equal to or greater than the County s.

Page 4 Use of Revenues Staff believes that consideration should be given that funds collected via the County linkage fee be used solely for programs administered by the Broward County Housing Finance and Community Redevelopment Division to construct or rehabilitate housing for very-low, low, and moderate income persons, split among three (3) geographic areas (north, central, and south), each of which will be combinations of County Commission Districts. The County would retain 3% of all revenues for administrative costs. 2015 Update: Staff notes that the 2008 paper considered distributing funding to municipal SHIP or HOME housing programs and awarding the balance of funding through a competitive process. It is felt that Staff s alternative consideration described above may better ensure that program funds are sufficient to be utilized for maximum benefit. However, County fees would not be collected from or allocated to those municipalities which have established an equivalent or more stringent linkage fee program. 2015 EPGM Recommendation: EPGM staff recommends that funds collected via the County linkage fee be used for programs administered by the Broward County Housing Finance and Community Redevelopment Division to construct or rehabilitate housing for very-low, low, and moderate income persons, split among three (3) geographic areas (north, central, and south), each of which will be combinations of County Commission Districts. The County would retain 3% of all revenues for administrative costs and to assist in covering the costs of eligible waivers. Timing of Fee Assessments Staff feels that that a County housing linkage fee should be assessed and collected prior to application for a building permit within any local government within Broward County which has not enacted a linkage fee program equivalent to or more stringent than the County s. Linkage fee payment would coincide with the collection of transportation concurrency fees with the environmental approval for these building permit applications, all of which are performed by the County s Planning and Development Management Division. 2015 Update: Staff s opinion at this time reflects no change from the September 2008 discussion. 2015 EPGM Recommendation: EPGM staff recommends that fees should be assessed and collected prior to application for a building permit within any local government within Broward County which has not enacted a linkage fee program equivalent to or more stringent than the County s.

Page 5 EXHIBIT 1. Broward County Housing Linkage Fee Nexus Study 2014