Chair Theisse and Planning Commission Members. Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Item #5

Similar documents
# , Lecy Bros. o/b/o Charlie & Nora Daum, 1920 Fagerness Point Road - Variances (Lot area, hardcover, setbacks) - Public Hearing

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: July 9, 2015 Item No.: 13. Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section:

ZONING VARIANCES - ADMINISTRATIVE

INCOMPLETE APPLICATIONS WILL BE RETURNED! GENERAL PROPERTY INFORMATION. Applicant s name Day Phone address Authorized Agent (if applicable)

City of Independence

To: Stillwater Town Board Reference: Horst Variance Request Stillwater Township, Minnesota Copies To: Town Board Kathy Schmoekel, Town Clerk

Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator

MEMORANDUM. DATE: April 6, 2017 TO: Zoning Hearing Board Jackie and Jake Collas. FROM: John R. Weller, AICP, Zoning Officer

ZONING VARIANCES ADMINISTRATIVE

Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator

ARTICLE 50. PD 50. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: May 6, 2004

ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS FOR SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION (WINDERMERE, PHASE G, SECTION ONE) Article One DEFINITIONS (Windermere, Phase G, Section One)

AGENDA ITEM. Planning Department Report 1. Purpose. This application is regarding variances to develop a vacant nonconforming property.

LAND USE APPLICATION

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, July 17, :30 o clock p.m.

Chair Thiesse, Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director

SECTION 16. "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT

Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS

CHECKLIST FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT

Comparison of Chapter CCC

Draft MINUTES OF THE CARLTON COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING August 21, 2018

ARTICLE 24 SITE PLAN REVIEW

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ORDINANCE

CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS

Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.

No principal structure shall be located any closer to any. street or property line than the required minimum setback as

THE BLUFFS AT CYPRESS CREEK SUBDIVISION

ACCESSORY STRUCTURES L D C I TEM #6 S U M M A RY A N A LY S I S

Initial Project Review

WASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Vacant Corner Lot in Golden Gate

BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION PACKET

FOR SALE. 6 Unit Apartment Complex in Stuart, Florida. 820 NW River Shores Blvd., Stuart, FL 34994

THE CI FY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA

Condominium Unit Requirements.

ARTICLE 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT

SECTION 10 STANDARD PLATS

AGENDA STATEMENT NO BUSINESS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION City of Victoria, Minnesota STAFF REPORT. Casco Ventures (Developer)

6.1 SCHEDULE OF AREA, FRONTAGE, YARD AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS

APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE OR PERMISSION UNDER SECTION 45 OF THE PLANNING ACT

Nassau County Single Land Split Application

City of Richmond. W~Craig / Director, De-y.e( ment. Report to Committee PLN - 256

AN AMENDMENT to the Montgomery County Zoning Ordinance to: - establish the Montgomery Village Overlay Zone. Development Standards for Euclidean Zones

BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION

Memorandum To: From: CC: Date: Re:

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

MAPLE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION May 26, 2015

INTRODUCTION PAST DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS

ARTICLE 5.0 SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

Fee Type Make Cheque Payable to Fee. (Minor - easement, lot addition, lease, etc.) City of Burlington $3, City of Burlington

CITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MAY 31, 2017 AGENDA SHADOW LAKE 2 FINAL PLAT FP

COMMUNITY AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT HOPKINSVILLE KY

SECTION 4: PRELIMINARY PLAT

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT REGULAR AGENDA

PERMIT FEES Within the shore impact zone (Includes Rip-Rap and Sand Blankets) $ Over 51 cubic yards $100.00

PETITION FOR VARIANCE. Village Hall Glen Carbon, IL (Do not write in this space-for Office Use Only) Notice Published On: Parcel I.D. No.

CITY OF HUDSONVILLE Planning Commission Minutes March 15, (Approved April 19, 2017)

Community Development Department 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

Review of Land Divisions in Open Space and Residential Zones 660

CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

Planning Commission Staff Report Final Plat Approval Administrative Hearing Date: June 5, 2013 ITEM 5 Dixon Neighborhood ALTERNATIVE ACTIONS

RIVER VALE MASTER PLAN PZ CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING JULY 19, 2017 CITY OF BEND

ARTICLE 13 CONDOMINIUM REGULATIONS

ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO

KETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda Non Public Hearing Item

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS

Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances

Draft MINUTES OF THE CARLTON COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING July 17, 2018

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The number indicates the number of copies for submittal (if applicable).

Woodway, TX ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE

CITY OF VICTORIA Location Map

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT

BYRON TOWNSHIP ZONING APPLICATION

MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST

MEMORANDUM. Critical Areas Ordinance Density Requirements

** If your lot does not meet the requirements above, please read Sec below

PICKENS COUNTY UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ORDINANCE. Organization of the Ordinance

ZONING COMPATIBILITY & WORKSHEET

MINUTES 7:30 PM. Block 40, Lots 8 & 8.04 Minor Subdivision Tumble Falls Road Completeness Determination

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE DERBY ZONING REGULATIONS AUGUST 12, 2008

Public Meetings: Loon Call (Muskoka) Inc. Bracebridge II Proposed Plan of Subdivision (File No. S2015-2) Zoning Amendment Application D14-15/16

ROEBLING MANSION REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN

WESTMINSTER PARK SUBDIVISION

It is recommended that this application be considered and that it be referred a public meeting.

RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

B. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.

Site Plan Application

Approved: May 9, 2018 CITY OF ARDEN HILLS, MINNESOTA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, APRIL 4, :30 P.M. - ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL

DECLARATION OF RESTRICITONS AFFECTING EWING PLACE SUBDIVISION SECTION 3

Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission

CHAPTER 21.11: NONCONFORMITIES...1

PREPARED FOR THE URBAN DESIGN COMMISSION AND PLAN COMMISSION

PINE CANYON PD ZONING REGULATIONS

Proposed Height and Setback Regulations

Transcription:

Date Application Received: 4/20/16 Date Application Considered as Complete: 5/3/16 120-Day Review Period Expires: 7/2/16 To: Chair Theisse and Planning Commission Members From: Date: May 12, 2016 Mike Gaffron, Senior Planner Item #5 Subject: #16-3829, John & Sarah Lindahl, 2465-2485 North Shore Drive - Subdivision: Lot Line Rearrangement - Public Hearing Zoning District: LR-1A, One Family Lakeshore Residential District (2 acres/200 width) Application Summary: Applicants own both properties. This is a lot line rearrangement resulting in detachment of a 0.29 acre parcel from 2485 North Shore Drive and re-attachment to 2465 North Shore Drive. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the lot line rearrangement as proposed. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Survey - Proposed Lot Line Rearrangement Exhibit C. Staff Sketch Analysis of Dry Buildable vs Wetland Exhibit D. Hardcover Pre- and Post- Calculations Exhibit E. Airphotos Exhibit F. Plat Map & Property Owners List Pertinent Zoning Ordinance Section Sec. 78-305. - Area, height, lot width and yard requirements. (a) Height. No structure or building in the LR-1A district shall exceed 2½ stories and shall not exceed 30 feet in height except as provided in section 78-1366. (b) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Lot Area (acres) Lot Width (feet) Front Yard (feet) Side Yard Adjacent to Another Lot (feet) Rear Yard (feet) Side Yard Adjacent to Street (feet) 2.0 200 50 30 50 50 Summary The Lindahls are proposing to relocate the shared lot line between these two developed properties, resulting in a better balance of gross lot area and creating conforming side setbacks for the existing residence and barn on 2465. In terms of dry buildable lot area, neither existing lot is conforming to the 2.0 acre minimum, and neither will become conforming as a result of the rearrangement. In terms of width, 2485 remains conforming at both the OHWL and at the 75 setback line, while 2465 remains nonconforming, becoming 2 feet narrower at the OHWL but 7 feet wider at the 75 setback line. Both properties remain conforming as to hardcover and lot coverage. Both properties are served by municipal sewer. They share an existing driveway accessing North Shore Drive.

16-3829 May 12, 2016 Page 2 of 3 Lot Analysis Table Dry Buildable Area* Wetland Area* Total Area Existing 2465 North Shore Drive 1.33 ac. 0.00 ac. 1.33 ac. 2485 North Shore Drive 1.63 ac. 0.84 ac. 2.47 ac. Total 2.96 ac. 0.84 ac. 3.80 ac. Proposed 2465 North Shore Drive 1.62 ac 0.00 ac. 1.62 ac. 2485 North Shore Drive 1.34 ac. 0.84 ac. 2.18 ac. Total 2.96 ac. 0.84 ac. 3.80 ac. * Dry/wet areas calculated by staff scaled from survey Hardcover Tier 1: 25% allowed Pre- Lot Line Rearrangement Post- Lot Line Rearrangement 2465 North Shore Drive 19.6% 18.6% 2485 North Shore Drive 12.8% 12.7% Building Setbacks. The existing residence at 2465 is approximately 22 feet from the side lot line where 30 would be required in LR-1A. The rearrangement results in this setback becoming conforming at 32.9 feet. Likewise, the existing barn at 2465, currently 3.6 feet from the lot line, will gain a conforming setback of 30.2 feet. The existing residence at 2485 will remain conforming with regard to side setbacks. The boat house at the southeast corner of this property is considered as a legal nonconformity, existing prior to Orono codes (visible in 1945 and 1956 airphotos). This boat house is 11.4 feet from the side lot line and will be approximately 9 feet from the line after the rearrangement. No Park or Stormwater Fees Due. This lot line rearrangement does not result in new lots; the before condition is two developed building sites, and the after condition is two developed building sites. Therefore, no park fees and no stormwater trunk fees will be due. Drainage & Utility Easements. There is an existing municipal sewer easement that crosses both properties which will not be affected by the lot line rearrangement. Because these are not platted properties, there are no existing drainage and utilities easements that would be impacted or that might create future issues if not vacated, and no such easements are required to be granted. Driveway Easements. The lot line rearrangement will result in the need for modifying the existing driveway easements between the properties. Applicants have submitted legal descriptions to accomplish this. Combination of Parcels. New deeds must be created for both properties reflecting the new legal descriptions. Applicant s attorney will be handling this.

16-3829 May 12, 2016 Page 3 of 3 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the lot line rearrangement. New proposed legal descriptions have been drafted for each property. As part of this approval the applicants will be required to file new deeds based on the new legal descriptions. Planning Commission should hold the public hearing regarding the lot line rearrangement and make a recommendation to the City Council.