CHAPTER 4. MANAGER Single-Family Multi-Family Total. CHAPTER 4: AREA OF IMPACT AND BUILDOUT ANALYSIS Housing Needs Analysis

Similar documents
BUILD-OUT ANALYSIS GRANTHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE

Gold Beach Buildable Lands Analysis

City of Bellingham Urban Growth Area - Land Supply Analysis Summary

TOWN OF BROOKLINE, NEW HAMPSHIRE

CITY OF MEDFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUILDABLE LAND INVENTORY

Land Capacity Analysis

Town of Prescott Valley 2013 Land Use Assumptions

SECTION 3. Housing. Appendix A LAND USE DEFINITIONS

Land Use Survey Summer 2014

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

Build-Out Analysis. Methodology

Residential Capacity Estimate

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

CHAPTER 2 VACANT AND REDEVELOPABLE LAND INVENTORY

Chapter 5: Testing the Vision. Where is residential growth most likely to occur in the District? Chapter 5: Testing the Vision

2016 Census Bulletin Changing Composition of the Housing Stock

Fiscal Impact Analysis Evergreen Community

CHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY

Existing Land Use. Typical densities for single-family detached residential development in Cumberland County: 1

3. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 29

DRAFT REPORT. Boudreau Developments Ltd. Hole s Site - The Botanica: Fiscal Impact Analysis. December 18, 2012

Table of Contents. Title Page # Title Page # List of Tables ii 6.7 Rental Market - Townhome and Apart ment Rents

City of Astoria Comprehensive Plan URBAN GROWTH

Analysis of Infill Development Potential Under the Green Line TOD Ordinance

Return on Investment Model

LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS REPORT POTENTIAL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT WEST WHITELAND TOWNSHIP, CHESTER COUNTY, PA

Annual (2013) Review of the Surrey Official Community Plan

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development

Housing Characteristics

CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM

Rezone property from RR(T)D3, D1(T)D3, and RR(T)D15 to D3 and D15 along North Douglas Highway.

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232

Infill Housing Analysis

Town of Gilford, New Hampshire

June 12, 2014 Housing Data: Statistics and Trends

PORTLAND PLAN. Household and Employment Forecasts and Development Capacity

Central Corridor Forecasting Methodology

APPENDIX B: Industrial Land Inventory and Supply Estimates Technical Background

2.2.2 The Land Use Setting

Truax Park Apartments

Town of North Topsail Beach

The Onawa and CHAT Report

Land Use Planning Analysis. Phase 2 Drayton Valley Annexation Proposal

Santa Monica Planning and Community Development Department. Build Out Analysis

PAPRlamird4-Lairds Corner

Appendix A2 Methodology for Estimating Employment Capacity in MD NCSGRE Aug 2012 Page 1

410 Land Use Trends Comprehensive Plan Section 410

2008 Buildable Lands Inventory and Capacity Analysis

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRYAN, TEXAS:

PEACHTREE INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD small area study

Shaping Our Future. Return-on-Investment Study. June 2017

Comprehensive Plan 2030

8Land Use. The Land Use Plan consists of the following elements:

POPULATION FORECASTS

2006 YEAR END HOUSING MONITORING AND SUBDIVISION STATUS REPORTS

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND KEL-MAC INCORPORATED. Before: The Honourable Justice Benjamin B. Taylor

management Lake views from single-family homes are highly sought after by Lake Lure property owners and visitors.

2013 Fredericton Housing Outlook Seminar Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

2.2 Future Demand Projection Methodology

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

Impact Of Financing Terms On Nominal Land Values: Implications For Land Value Surveys

4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION

Growth and Land Use CHAPTER THREE

Detroit Neighborhood Housing Markets

Mississauga Growth Forecast

Table 4d-1. City of Poulsbo Residential Building Permits CITY OF POULSBO Unit Type

2006 EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT

Land Supply and Growth Study Town of Rocky Mountain House October 2009

Planning Commission Research Topic No. 1 (1995)

PAPRlamird5-Four Seasons

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015

AN ANALYSIS OF THE LAND USE AND VALUE OF WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY S MOUNTAINSIDE PARCEL. Prepared For Weber State University

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

9. C-S-C to R-R. Approved SMA/ZAPS/SE 200' Scale Change Number Zoning Change Area of Change. 9 C-S-C to R-R 0.80± acres SMA 7/24/84 210SE04

HOUSING ELEMENT Inventory Analysis

Implementation. Approved Master Plan and SMA for Henson Creek-South Potomac 103

The New California Dream How Demographic and Economic Trends May Shape the Housing Market

7. DISTRICT OF MUSKOKA HOUSING SUPPLY AND DEMAND

Build-out Analysis. City of Cape Coral CITY OF CAPE CORAL Department of Community Development

SANTA ROSA IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE FINAL REPORT. May Robert D. Spencer, Urban Economics Strategic Economics Kittelson & Associates

A Brief Overview of H-GAC s Regional Growth Forecast Methodology

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

Regional Development Capacity Report

L. LAND USE. Page L-1

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Porter. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

APPENDIX A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE LANDS SEPARATED FROM LEDUC COUNTY AND ANNEXED TO THE TOWN OF BEAUMONT

RESIDENTIAL LAND SUPPLY MONITORING PROJECT

r t h c t y w e s t * THESE PAGES REPLACE THE PAGES HAVING THE SAME PAGE NUMBER AS THOSE IN THE DEVELOPMENT UNIT 4A PLAN TEXT DATED OCTOBER 26, 1987.

Introduction. Sidney Ainkorn, Peter Mathison, and David Tomporowski. General History and Context. Geographic Context

2014 Charleston Tri-County Region

Table of Contents. Appendix...22

ACTION FORM BRYAN CITY COUNCIL

MEMORANDUM. DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C

TOWN OF PELHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE

RISK ASSESSMENT APPENDIX E HAZARD ANALYSIS RESULTS

Land Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee of the Denver City Council FROM: Scott Robinson, Senior City Planner DATE: March 22, 2018 RE:

Subject: LandWatch s comments on Salinas Economic Development Element FEIR. Dear Mayor Gunter and Members of the Salinas City Council:

LAND USE. Land Cover. Current Land Use

AAug ugust 2017

Transcription:

The Area of Impact, the areas that Blueprint Boise identifies as potential annexation areas, have come up in several conversations with city officials in the context of the housing analysis. The Area of Impact (A.O.I.I) analysis estimates what it would mean in terms of existing and future housing should the identified Areas of Impact be included. This analysis focuses on the potential annexation areas which are in the Area of Impact and mapped in the Land Use Plan but that are not currently in the city limits with one exception. The Northwest planning area has been annexed recently, but was included in the analysis because the annexation was so recent. The buildout and potential housing mix analyses were designed to answer two questions: 1. Approximately how many housing units would be added to the city and what is the mix if each area in AOI were annexed in the near future? 2. What is the possible range of buildout for each area in the AOI? Using Community VIZ software, GIS layers from the City s GIS department, 2009-2013 ACS data, and density parameters for the land use categories in the Blueprint Boise Land Use Plan, analysts were able to examine the changes to Boise s housing mix were it to annex the various parts of the Area of Impact today and how much more housing is possible at various levels of buildout. Housing density parameters from the Land Use Plan categories were used to determine potential future housing mix and densities, and 2009-2013 ACS housing estimates were used for the current inventory in each of the planning areas included in the Area of Impact. The not yet annexed portions of Southwest Planning Area comprise the largest and most developed portion of the Area of Impact with over 6,000 units. The Foothills has a surprisingly high number of residential units today as well, given the terrain. Also, the recently annexed portion of the Northwest planning area contains about 1,300 dwelling units. The remaining portions of the planning areas located in the Area of Impact are in the low hundreds of units. MANAGER Single- Total Northwest (Including 2014 Annex) 1,000 269 1,269 West Bench 108 59 167 Southwest 5,480 687 6,167 Foothills 863 173 1,036 Southeast 352 33 385 Barber Valley 11 3 14 Ten Mile Creek 164 6 170 CHAPTER 4: AREA OF IMPACT AND BUILDOUT ANALYSIS 59

The Area of Impact planning areas were divided into two categories, areas that are mostly undeveloped and labeled green field and developed areas that are mostly subdivided and developed accordingly. Ten Mile Creek, Southeast, Barber Valley, and the West Bench planned annexation areas are all considered green field and Southwest and Foothills annexation area and the recently annexed Northwest planning area are all mostly subdivided and are considered developed areas. The model treated green field annexation areas the same since there was not a significant existing base of development in these areas. The following density assumptions and housing type splits were used to calculate the potential number of single family and multi-family units at buildout. These assumptions are drawn from Blueprint Boise and conversations with the planning department. MANAGER Housing Split/Use Minimum Density/Acre Maximum Density/Acre High Density family 269 1,269 Compact 30 percent single-family/70 percent multi-family for low scenario, 100 percent multi-family for high scenarior 59 167 Suburban Single-family 687 6,167 Large Lot Single-family 173 1,036 Mixed Use family 33 385 Planned Community 8 units per acre for Ten Mile Creek 50 percent split between single-family and multi-family Buildable 164 1 Unit/40 Acres Slope Protection 1 Unit/40 Acres The Ten Mile Creek, Southeast, Barber Valley and West Bench annexation areas are composed of predominantly unbuilt and un-subdivided land. Currently there are less than 800 estimated units in these areas combined and over 5,000 acres combined. Because of the relative lack of development this analysis applies minimum and maximum densities from Blueprint Boise to calculate total number of units at buildout. Under the high development scenario, over 21,000 units could be developed in these areas at a split of 72 percent single family and 28 percent multi-family, which is a lower proportion of single family housing than currently exists in the city. This is includes the 50/50 single family and multi-family split in Ten Mile Creek which is forecasted for up 8 dwelling units per acre. The majority of this development is likely to occur in the Ten Mile Creek are, and in the areas with a planned community land use category in the Southeast annexation area. Where the 2,300 acres of planned community area in the Southeast is developed at four units per acre as called for in Blueprint Boise, the result would be 9,000 single family dwellings. 60 CHAPTER 4: AREA OF IMPACT AND BUILDOUT ANALYSIS

MANAGER Single- Total Ten Mile Creek 164 6 170 Southeast 352 33 385 Barber Valley 11 3 14 West Bench 108 59 167 Single- Total Single- % % High Buildout Scenario Ten Mile Creek 5,730 5,730 11,460 50% 50% Southeast 9,189-9,189 100% 0% Barber Valley 611-611 100% 0% West Bench 231 298 529 44% 56% Total 15,761 6,028 21,789 72% 28% Low Buildout Scenario Ten Mile Creek 5,730 5,730 11,460 50% 50% Southeast 9,189-9,189 100% 0% Barber Valley 342-342 100% 0% West Bench 121 99 220 55% 45% Total 15,382 5,829 21,212 73% 27% The Northwest annexation area includes 600 acres recently annexed by the city. There are over 1,200 housing units in the Northwest Annexation area, 79 percent of which are single-family homes. Total Single- Detached CHAPTER 4: AREA OF IMPACT AND BUILDOUT ANALYSIS 61 % 2014 Northwest Annexation Area 935 751 80% 184 20% Remainder of Northwest Annexation area 334 249 75% 85 25% Combined Northwest 1,269 1,000 79% 269 21% The Northwest annexation area is primarily composed of subdivided built out property, with small areas of infill development. The subdivided land base and fragmented ownership means that without comprehensive redevelopment of significant portions of the planning area, the full buildout will not be much higher than what exists today and infill will be slow and incremental. To remain consistent with the rest of the buildout analysis, Blueprint Boise density parameters were also applied. If redevelopment of the area occurs according to Blueprint Boise there would be between 4,000 and 10,000 additional units. Under the low scenario 35 percent of these units will be single family and 65 percent will be multi-family units, this %

is due to a large portion of the planning area currently designated as compact, and mixed use. Under the high scenario only 12 percent of redeveloped units will be single family units. Count Percentage Low Scenario Single 1,392 35% family 2,636 65% High Scenario Single 1,150 12% family 8,843 88% Annexing the remainder of the foothills planning area is unlikely to significantly impact housing mixture in Boise or substantially increase the residential inventory. The majority of the land in the Foothills annexation area is developed or carries the slope protection land use category where density is limited to one unit per 40 acres. Currently there are over one thousand units, the majority of which are single family. At buildout, total units will increase by less than 200 units for a total potential of 1,200 units. Under this model, 86 percent of this buildout will be single family. Count Percentage Existing Units (Total) 1,036 Single 863 83% family 173 17% Potential New Single Units 1 unit per 40 Acres 181 Total Units at Buildout 1,217 Single 1,044 86% family 173 14% The Southwest annexation area has a large base of existing subdivisions which are largely built out. To account for these existingdensities and development patterns, three scenarios are presented to show potential impacts of annexing over 7,000 acres of land. A high and low scenario equate to potential buildout established by the land use category designations in Blueprint Boise (high) and a business as usual build out that applies existing densities of subdivided land to the remainder of not yet subdivided land in the planning area (low). Currently there are just over 6,000 units on nearly 5,000 subdivided acres which translates to an average density of 1.23 units per acre, on existing subdivided land. If business as usual development pattern continues the remaining 2,000 acres of not yet subdivided land would yield an additional 2,600 units. Assuming the existing ratio of 89 percent single-family homes continues, Boise could incorporate an 62 CHAPTER 4: AREA OF IMPACT AND BUILDOUT ANALYSIS

additional 2,300 single family units and 300 multi-family units. The business as usual model shows that if current development patterns are continued throughout the planning area, the Southeast annexation areas would have over 7,800 total units. Were the planning area developed (and redeveloped) according to the parameters in Blueprint Boise, this area would see between 23,000 and 50,000 new units. Under the high scenario, Boise could potentially gain an additional 19,000 single-family units and over 30,000 multi-family units from the Southwest Annexation Area. One of the factors driving this level of buildout are the large areas classified as compact in Blueprint Boise, which are slated for up to 15 units per acre. The following two tables summarize the business as usual and the high and low development scenarios for the potential annexation areas in the Southwest planning area. Count Subdivided Acres in Annexation Area 4,996 Un-subdivided Acres 2,129 Total Acres 7,125 Existing Units in Annexation Area 6,167 Existing Density 1.23 New Units (Business as Usual) 2,628 Single 89% family 11% Count Existing Units (Total) 6,167 Percentage Single 5,480 89% 687 11% High Scenario (Total Units) Single 19,362 39% 30,662 61% Low Scenario (Total Units) Single 14,715 63% 8,794 37% Business As Usual (Additional New Units) Single 2,335 89% 293 11% Business As Usual (Total Units) Single 7,815 89% 980 11% CHAPTER 4: AREA OF IMPACT AND BUILDOUT ANALYSIS 63