STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Form #) Date 07/16/2015 Dist 03 Co PLA Rte 80 P/M 0.1/2.2 and 4.1/6.0 EA 03-3F230 EXHIBIT 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) Page 1 of 6 Project Description: Propose to widen the existing Interstate 80 (I-80) adding an eastbound auxiliary lane between State Route 65 (SR 65) and Rocklin Road, and a westbound auxiliary lane between Douglas Boulevard and Riverside Avenue. Subject: Right of Way Data Alternate No. 1 This Alternate meets the criteria for a Design/Build project: Yes No X 1. Right of Way Cost Estimate: To be entered into PMCS COST RW1-5 Screens. Current Value Future Use Escalation Rate Escalated Value A. Total Acquisition Cost Acquisition, including Excess Lands, $ 36,964 Damages, and Goodwill. $ 30,450 3* % $ 31,364 Project Permit Fees. $ 5,600 0 $ 5,600 B. Utility Relocation (State Share) $ 0 3 % $ 0 C. Relocation Assistance $ 0 0 % $ 0 D. Clearance/Demolition $ 0 0 % $ 0 E. Title and Escrow $ 6,000 0 % $ 6,000 F. Total Estimated Cost $ 42,050 $ 42,964 G. Construction Contract Work $ 0 (These are construction costs that are to be included in the projects PS&E.) 2. Current Date of Right of Way Certification January 2017 3. Parcel Data: To be entered into PMCS EVNT RW Screen. Type Dual/Appr Utilities RR Involvements X U4-1 0 None X A 8** -2 0 C&M Agrmt B 4*** -3 0 Svc Contract C -4 0 Design D U5-7 4 Const. E XXXX -8 0 Lic/RE/Clauses F XXXX -9 0 Misc. R/W Work Total 12 RAP Displ No Clear/Demo No Const Permits Yes Areas: R/W 1.0 Ac. Excess No No. Excess Parcels 0 Entered PMCS Screens / / by Entered AGRE Screen (Railroad data only) / / *Escalation rate is 3% for 1 year for Right of Way and Utilities **5 properties will require a TCE, 1 property will be zero value *** 4 properties will require Fee Acquisitions by Condemnation No
RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Cont.) (Form #) EXHIBIT 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) Page 2 of 6 4. Are there any major items of construction contract work? Yes X No (If Yes, explain.) The project will include roadway widening, bridge widening, retaining walls, and sound walls. Impacts to utilities will occur as part of the construction contract; however the work will be paid for with utility funds authorized during the right of way phase. 5. Provide a general description of the right of way and excess lands required (zoning, use, major improvements, critical or sensitive parcels, etc.). No right of way required. Acquisitions are both Permanent Fee and Temporary Construction Easements. The surrounding areas are devoted to a mix of commercial and residential zoning. One major improvement includes sound wall relocation within residential property. 6. Is there an effect on assessed valuation? Yes Not Significant No X (If Yes, explain.) 7. Are utility facilities or rights of way affected? Yes X No (If Yes, attach Utility Information Sheet, Exhibit 4-EX-5.) The following checked items may seriously impact lead time for utility relocation: Longitudinal policy conflict(s) Environmental concerns impacting acquisition of potential easements Power lines operating in excess of 50 KV and substations No policy exceptions exist. (See attached Exhibit 4-EX-5 for explanation.) 8. Are Railroad facilities or rights of way affected? Yes No X (If Yes, attach Railroad Information Sheet, Exhibit 4-EX-6.)
EXHIBIT RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Cont.) 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) (Form #) Page 3 of 6 9. Were any previously unidentified sites with hazardous waste and/or material found? Yes X None Evident (If Yes, attach memorandum per R/W Manual, Chapter 4, Section 4.01.10.00.) See Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Executive Summary attached. 10. Are RAP displacements required? Yes No X (If Yes, provide the following information.) No. of single family No. of multi-family No. of business/nonprofit No. of farms Based on Draft/Final Relocation Impact Statement/Study dated sufficient replacement housing (will/will not) be available without Last Resort Housing., it is anticipated that 11. Are there Material Borrow and/or Disposal Sites required? Yes No X (If Yes, explain.) 12. Are there potential relinquishments and/or abandonments? Yes No X (If Yes, explain.) 13. Are there any existing and/or potential airspace sites? Yes No X (If Yes, explain.)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PCTPA, together with Caltrans, Placer County, City of Rocklin, and City of Roseville, have identified the need for additional transportation improvements in the area. Two key improvements to the regional plan are the addition of auxiliary lanes on I-80 in the easterly direction between SR 65 and Rocklin Road (Location 1) and in the westerly direction between Douglas Boulevard and Riverside Avenue (Location 2). Consideration is also being given to constructing a fifth through lane in the westbound direction instead of the auxiliary lane. Both the eastbound and westbound auxiliary lanes by definition are a portion of roadway, supplementary to the through movements, which enter at an on-ramp and exit at the following off-ramp. They provide an area for weaving and speed changes and enhance capacity. A through lane carries vehicles through an interchange and traffic can continue past an off-ramp. This report presents the results of an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) for property associated with the Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes project. The properties assessed for this ISA (Subject Properties) include existing Caltrans right-of-way, as well as two privately owned residential and four undeveloped properties immediately adjacent to the proposed improvements. Multiple other adjacent properties were assessed within a 1-mile radius of both Location 1 and 2. During project design, it will be determined if the 1116 Melrose Ave property (APN 014-231-009) will be acquired and if the existing structure will be demolished. Accordingly, if necessary, an interior/exterior property inspection should be performed, to identify potential hazardous wastes/materials, prior to acquisition of the property. It is not anticipated that any other structures will be taken for this project. Based on the results of the ISA evaluation, the Summary Table below describes evidence of the potential for Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) or Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) on the Subject Properties. Location Existing roadways within project boundaries including I-80, Rocklin Road, Douglas Boulevard, and Riverside Avenue Linda Creek Bridge Soils adjacent to I-80 SUMMARY TABLE Description of REC Evidence Found Potential lead and heavy metals associated with pavement striping. Implementation of improvements may require the removal and disposal of yellow traffic stripe and pavement marking materials (paint, thermoplastic, permanent tape, and temporary tape). Yellow paints made prior to 1995 may exceed hazardous waste criteria under Title 22, California Code of Regulations, and require disposal in a Class I disposal site. Previous study of the Linda Creek Bridge indicated evidence of asbestos containing material in the Metal Beam Guard Rail bearing pad shim. If removal of the bearing pad shims is necessary to widen the bridge, they will require removal and proper disposal by a licensed and certified asbestos abatement contractor in conjunction with the planned bridge widening. In order to complete the necessary asbestos abatement/removal, a Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPD) permit for the Linda Creek Bridge will be attained. Potential contaminated soils associated with aerially deposited lead. Implementation of improvements may require the disturbance and removal of contaminated soils. Disturbance of these soils will require a preparation of a Lead Compliance Plan and Lead Awareness Training. Further sampling and analysis of soil will be initiated during PS&E to determine the extent of lead-contaminated soils. Soils containing hazardous levels of aerially deposited lead will be excavated and disposed of at a Class 1 Disposal Facility or a Class 2 Disposal Facility permitted by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) before completion of the proposed project. Description of Associated AUL None Found None Found None Found December 2014 Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes Project i
Location Existing buildings that could be demolished/altered due to planned construction activities. Existing buildings that could be demolished/altered due to planned construction activities. SUMMARY TABLE Description of REC Evidence Found Potential for Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). New uses of ACM were banned by the EPA in 1989. Revisions to regulations issued by the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) on June 30, 1995, require that all thermal systems insulation, surfacing materials, and resilient flooring materials installed prior to 1981 be considered Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials (PAC) and treated accordingly. In order to rebut the designation as PAC, OSHA requires that these materials be surveyed, sampled, and assessed in accordance with 40 CFR 763 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act [AHERA]). ACM have also been documented in the rail shim sheet packing, bearing pads, support piers, and expansion joint material of bridges. Potential lead-based paint on painted portions of existing buildings. Structures constructed prior to 1978 are presumed to contain lead-based paint unless proven otherwise, although buildings constructed after 1978 may also contain lead-based paints. Description of Associated AUL None Found None Found The scope of an ISA is limited to anecdotal and visual evidence of potential RECs and does not include verification of RECs based upon environmental testing. Based on the governmental records search, aerial photograph and topographic map review and visual site survey, the following actions are recommended to verify the presence/extent of RECs and evaluate the potential for remediation during the Plans, Specifications & Estimate (PS&E) phase of the Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes project: To avoid impacts from pavement striping during construction it is recommended that testing and removal requirements for yellow striping and pavement marking materials be performed in accordance with Caltrans Standard Special Provisions for REMOVE TRAFFIC STRIPE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS. The Linda Creek Bridge bearing pad shims will require removal and proper disposal by a licensed and certified asbestos abatement contractor in conjunction with the planned bridge widening. In order to complete the necessary asbestos abatement/removal, a Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPD) permit for the Linda Creek Bridge will be attained. The proposed project will require a Non-Standard Special Provision (NSSP) for excavation and handling of soils contaminated with aerially deposited lead. The NSSP should address CCR Title 8, Section 1532.1, Lead, which includes a Lead Compliance Plan and Lead Awareness training. Further sampling and analysis of soil will be initiated during PS&E to determine the extent of lead-contaminated soils. Soils containing hazardous levels of aerially deposited lead will be excavated and disposed of at a Class 1 Disposal Facility or a Class 2 Disposal Facility permitted by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) before completion of the proposed project. Buildings constructed prior to 1989 may have been constructed using asbestos containing materials. Conduct asbestos surveys utilizing a certified consultant prior to any modification to, or demolition of the buildings or structures within the study area (e.g. APN 014-231-009; 1116 Melrose Ave) that may be altered or demolished to accommodate the planned construction. The survey should include a Health and Safety Plan for worker safety and Work Plan for removal/disposal of asbestos containing material, if encountered. December 2014 Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes Project ii
Buildings constructed prior to 1978 are presumed to contain lead based paints. Conduct lead-based paint surveys utilizing a certified consultant prior to modifications/demolition of any existing buildings or structures within the study area (e.g. APN 014-231-009; 1116 Melrose Ave) that may be altered or demolished to accommodate the planned construction. The survey should include a Health and Safety Plan for worker safety and Work Plan for removal/disposal of lead-based paint, if encountered. Conduct an interior/exterior hazardous materials/hazardous wastes inspection of any existing structures that will be altered or demolished to accommodate the planned construction (e.g. APN 014-231-009; 1116 Melrose Ave). Should the inspections indicate the presence of hazardous materials/hazardous wastes, a Health and Safety Plan for worker safety and Work Plan for removal/disposal of hazardous materials should be prepared, if encountered. If the project area is anticipated to change (due to a change in the proposed project or staging area), further investigation for potential hazardous waste generators would be required to determine their impact to the revised project limits. The project study area is not anticipated to change; therefore, with the exception of the environmental screening described above, no additional Phase I or Phase II investigations are recommended at this time for the proposed project. I declare that to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as defined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312. Ryan Neves, PE Professional Registration Date December 2014 Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes Project iii
EXHIBIT RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Cont.) 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) (Form #) Page 5 of 6 Instructions for Completing the Right of Way Data Sheet To provide complete and consistent data for input into Right of Way s portion of PMCS, the Right of Way Data Sheet and Right of Way Estimate Worksheet will be used. The Right of Way Data Sheet has been designed to accomplish dual purposes: 1) function as an estimating form that is incorporated into the Project Report/Environmental Document as appropriate, and 2) provide essential data for PMCS by entry of Right of Way workload and cost estimates on the EVNT RW, COST RW1, and other PMCS screens for which Right of Way is responsible. Data required to complete Item 1 on the Right of Way Data Sheet is obtained from the totals of various columns on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. All sections of the Right of Way Data Sheet must be completed. If a section is not applicable, it should be so indicated. The following instructions relate to completion of Right of Way Data Sheet Items 1, 2, and 3. The balance of the Right of Way Data Sheet is self-explanatory. Entry 1.A.1. - Entry 1.A.2., 3., and 4. - Entry 1.A.5. - Entry 1.B.1., 2., and 3. - Entry 1.C.1., 2., and 3. - Entry 1.D.1., 2., and 3. - Entry 1.E.1., 2., and 3. - is the total Acquisition cost for the project alternative. It includes acquisition, including excess lands, damages, goodwill, and project permit fees. It is the total of entries 1.A.4. and 1.A.5. 1.A.2. is the grand total of Column 4 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet plus contingency costs. 1.A.3. is the escalation rate for Acquisition activities. 1.A.4. is 1.A.2. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.A.3. is the grand total of Column 15 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. 1.B.1. is obtained from the Utility Information Sheet provided by the Utility Estimator plus contingency costs. 1.B.2. is the escalation rate provided by the Utility Estimator. 1.B.3. is 1.B.1. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.B.2. 1.C.1. is the total of Column 5 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet plus contingency costs. 1.C.2. is the Relocation Assistance escalation rate. 1.C.3. is 1.C.1. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.C.2. 1.D.1. is the total of Column 6 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet plus contingency costs. 1.D.2. is the Clearance/Demolition escalation rate. 1.D.3. is 1.D.1. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.D.2. 1.E.1. is the total of Column 11 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. 1.E.2. is the Title and Escrow escalation rate. 1.E.3. is 1.E.2. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.E.2.
RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Cont.) (Form #) EXHIBIT 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) Page 6 of 6 Entry 1.F.1. and 2. - Entry 1.G. - Entry 2 - Entry 3.A. - Entry 3.B. - Entry 3.C. - Entry 3.D. - Entry 3.E. - Entry 3.F. - Entry 3.G. - Entry 3.H. - Entry 3.I. - 1.F.1. is the total of the Current Value column of the Right of Way Data Sheet. 1.F.2. is the total of the Escalated Value column of the Right of Way Data Sheet, excluding items 1A4 and 1A5. is the total of Column 10 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. The total estimate for Construction Contract Work is to be reported to Project Development and the Project Manager to ensure inclusion in the projects PS&E. is the anticipated Right of Way Certification date. Each parcel is typed in Column 1 of the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet (see Exhibit 4-EX-3 for definitions of each type). The total of each type is inserted on the appropriate line. Total of all parcels in the estimate. Total should equal the sum of Items X through D in the Type Column. Do not include a double count for dual appraisal parcels. Indicates the number of parcels per type that will require a dual appraisal. Refer to Right of Way Manual, Chapter 7, Section 7.01.07.00, for a definition of parcels requiring a dual appraisal. Utilities workload involvement obtained from the Utility Information Sheet is provided by the Utility Estimator. Refer to Right of Way Manual, Chapter 13, Exhibit 13-EX-6, for definitions of the various utility workload involvements. Railroad workload involvements obtained from the Railroad Information Sheet provided by the Railroad Coordinator. Enter railroad data in both EVNT RW and AGRE Screens. Note: Service Contracts are entered into for both Design and Construction services. Enter the number of each in the appropriate location; the total of both is entered on the Svc Contract line on the Data Sheet. Total RAP displacements. Amount is total of Column 7 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. Clearance/Demolition units. Amount is the total of Column 8 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. Construction Permits include material and disposal sites. Number is the total of Column 9 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. Condemnation Suits. Total number of condemnation suits anticipated in conjunction with the project based on district experience.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Form #) Date 07/16/2015 Dist 03 Co PLA Rte 80 P/M 0.1/2.2 and 4.1/6.0 EA 03-3F230 EXHIBIT 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) Page 1 of 6 Project Description: Propose to widen the existing Interstate 80 (I-80) adding an eastbound auxiliary lane between State Route 65 (SR 65) and Rocklin Road, and a westbound fifth lane between Douglas Boulevard and Riverside Avenue. Subject: Right of Way Data Alternate No. 2 This Alternate meets the criteria for a Design/Build project: Yes No X 1. Right of Way Cost Estimate: To be entered into PMCS COST RW1-5 Screens. Current Value Future Use Escalation Rate Escalated Value A. Total Acquisition Cost Acquisition, including Excess Lands, $ 36,964 Damages, and Goodwill. $ 30,450 3* % $ 31,364 Project Permit Fees. $ 5,600 0 $ 5,600 B. Utility Relocation (State Share) $ 0 3 % $ 0 C. Relocation Assistance $ 0 0 % $ 0 D. Clearance/Demolition $ 0 0 % $ 0 E. Title and Escrow $ 6,000 0 % $ 6,000 F. Total Estimated Cost $ 42,050 $ 42,964 G. Construction Contract Work $ 0 (These are construction costs that are to be included in the projects PS&E.) 2. Current Date of Right of Way Certification January 2017 3. Parcel Data: To be entered into PMCS EVNT RW Screen. Type Dual/Appr Utilities RR Involvements X U4-1 0 None X A 8** -2 0 C&M Agrmt B 4*** -3 0 Svc Contract C -4 0 Design D U5-7 4 Const. E XXXX -8 0 Lic/RE/Clauses F XXXX -9 0 Misc. R/W Work Total 12 RAP Displ No Clear/Demo No Const Permits Yes Areas: R/W 1.0 Ac. Excess No No. Excess Parcels 0 Entered PMCS Screens / / by Entered AGRE Screen (Railroad data only) / / *Escalation rate is 3% for 1 year for Right of Way and Utilities **6 properties will require a TCE, 2 properties will be zero value *** 4 properties will require Fee Acquisitions by Condemnation No
RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Cont.) (Form #) EXHIBIT 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) Page 2 of 6 4. Are there any major items of construction contract work? Yes X No (If Yes, explain.) The project will include roadway widening, bridge widening, retaining walls, and sound walls. Impacts to utilities will occur as part of the construction contract; however the work will be paid for with utility funds authorized during the right of way phase. 5. Provide a general description of the right of way and excess lands required (zoning, use, major improvements, critical or sensitive parcels, etc.). No right of way required. Acquisitions are both Permanent Fee and Temporary Construction Easements. The surrounding areas are devoted to a mix of commercial and residential zoning. One major improvement includes sound wall relocation within residential property. 6. Is there an effect on assessed valuation? Yes Not Significant No X (If Yes, explain.) 7. Are utility facilities or rights of way affected? Yes X No (If Yes, attach Utility Information Sheet, Exhibit 4-EX-5.) The following checked items may seriously impact lead time for utility relocation: Longitudinal policy conflict(s) Environmental concerns impacting acquisition of potential easements Power lines operating in excess of 50 KV and substations No policy exceptions exist. (See attached Exhibit 4-EX-5 for explanation.) 8. Are Railroad facilities or rights of way affected? Yes No X (If Yes, attach Railroad Information Sheet, Exhibit 4-EX-6.)
EXHIBIT RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Cont.) 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) (Form #) Page 3 of 6 9. Were any previously unidentified sites with hazardous waste and/or material found? Yes X None Evident (If Yes, attach memorandum per R/W Manual, Chapter 4, Section 4.01.10.00.) See Initial Site Assessment (ISA) Executive Summary attached. 10. Are RAP displacements required? Yes No X (If Yes, provide the following information.) No. of single family No. of multi-family No. of business/nonprofit No. of farms Based on Draft/Final Relocation Impact Statement/Study dated sufficient replacement housing (will/will not) be available without Last Resort Housing., it is anticipated that 11. Are there Material Borrow and/or Disposal Sites required? Yes No X (If Yes, explain.) 12. Are there potential relinquishments and/or abandonments? Yes No X (If Yes, explain.) 13. Are there any existing and/or potential airspace sites? Yes No X (If Yes, explain.)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PCTPA, together with Caltrans, Placer County, City of Rocklin, and City of Roseville, have identified the need for additional transportation improvements in the area. Two key improvements to the regional plan are the addition of auxiliary lanes on I-80 in the easterly direction between SR 65 and Rocklin Road (Location 1) and in the westerly direction between Douglas Boulevard and Riverside Avenue (Location 2). Consideration is also being given to constructing a fifth through lane in the westbound direction instead of the auxiliary lane. Both the eastbound and westbound auxiliary lanes by definition are a portion of roadway, supplementary to the through movements, which enter at an on-ramp and exit at the following off-ramp. They provide an area for weaving and speed changes and enhance capacity. A through lane carries vehicles through an interchange and traffic can continue past an off-ramp. This report presents the results of an Initial Site Assessment (ISA) for property associated with the Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes project. The properties assessed for this ISA (Subject Properties) include existing Caltrans right-of-way, as well as two privately owned residential and four undeveloped properties immediately adjacent to the proposed improvements. Multiple other adjacent properties were assessed within a 1-mile radius of both Location 1 and 2. During project design, it will be determined if the 1116 Melrose Ave property (APN 014-231-009) will be acquired and if the existing structure will be demolished. Accordingly, if necessary, an interior/exterior property inspection should be performed, to identify potential hazardous wastes/materials, prior to acquisition of the property. It is not anticipated that any other structures will be taken for this project. Based on the results of the ISA evaluation, the Summary Table below describes evidence of the potential for Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) or Activity and Use Limitations (AULs) on the Subject Properties. Location Existing roadways within project boundaries including I-80, Rocklin Road, Douglas Boulevard, and Riverside Avenue Linda Creek Bridge Soils adjacent to I-80 SUMMARY TABLE Description of REC Evidence Found Potential lead and heavy metals associated with pavement striping. Implementation of improvements may require the removal and disposal of yellow traffic stripe and pavement marking materials (paint, thermoplastic, permanent tape, and temporary tape). Yellow paints made prior to 1995 may exceed hazardous waste criteria under Title 22, California Code of Regulations, and require disposal in a Class I disposal site. Previous study of the Linda Creek Bridge indicated evidence of asbestos containing material in the Metal Beam Guard Rail bearing pad shim. If removal of the bearing pad shims is necessary to widen the bridge, they will require removal and proper disposal by a licensed and certified asbestos abatement contractor in conjunction with the planned bridge widening. In order to complete the necessary asbestos abatement/removal, a Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPD) permit for the Linda Creek Bridge will be attained. Potential contaminated soils associated with aerially deposited lead. Implementation of improvements may require the disturbance and removal of contaminated soils. Disturbance of these soils will require a preparation of a Lead Compliance Plan and Lead Awareness Training. Further sampling and analysis of soil will be initiated during PS&E to determine the extent of lead-contaminated soils. Soils containing hazardous levels of aerially deposited lead will be excavated and disposed of at a Class 1 Disposal Facility or a Class 2 Disposal Facility permitted by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) before completion of the proposed project. Description of Associated AUL None Found None Found None Found December 2014 Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes Project i
Location Existing buildings that could be demolished/altered due to planned construction activities. Existing buildings that could be demolished/altered due to planned construction activities. SUMMARY TABLE Description of REC Evidence Found Potential for Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM). New uses of ACM were banned by the EPA in 1989. Revisions to regulations issued by the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) on June 30, 1995, require that all thermal systems insulation, surfacing materials, and resilient flooring materials installed prior to 1981 be considered Presumed Asbestos Containing Materials (PAC) and treated accordingly. In order to rebut the designation as PAC, OSHA requires that these materials be surveyed, sampled, and assessed in accordance with 40 CFR 763 (Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act [AHERA]). ACM have also been documented in the rail shim sheet packing, bearing pads, support piers, and expansion joint material of bridges. Potential lead-based paint on painted portions of existing buildings. Structures constructed prior to 1978 are presumed to contain lead-based paint unless proven otherwise, although buildings constructed after 1978 may also contain lead-based paints. Description of Associated AUL None Found None Found The scope of an ISA is limited to anecdotal and visual evidence of potential RECs and does not include verification of RECs based upon environmental testing. Based on the governmental records search, aerial photograph and topographic map review and visual site survey, the following actions are recommended to verify the presence/extent of RECs and evaluate the potential for remediation during the Plans, Specifications & Estimate (PS&E) phase of the Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes project: To avoid impacts from pavement striping during construction it is recommended that testing and removal requirements for yellow striping and pavement marking materials be performed in accordance with Caltrans Standard Special Provisions for REMOVE TRAFFIC STRIPE AND PAVEMENT MARKINGS. The Linda Creek Bridge bearing pad shims will require removal and proper disposal by a licensed and certified asbestos abatement contractor in conjunction with the planned bridge widening. In order to complete the necessary asbestos abatement/removal, a Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPD) permit for the Linda Creek Bridge will be attained. The proposed project will require a Non-Standard Special Provision (NSSP) for excavation and handling of soils contaminated with aerially deposited lead. The NSSP should address CCR Title 8, Section 1532.1, Lead, which includes a Lead Compliance Plan and Lead Awareness training. Further sampling and analysis of soil will be initiated during PS&E to determine the extent of lead-contaminated soils. Soils containing hazardous levels of aerially deposited lead will be excavated and disposed of at a Class 1 Disposal Facility or a Class 2 Disposal Facility permitted by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) before completion of the proposed project. Buildings constructed prior to 1989 may have been constructed using asbestos containing materials. Conduct asbestos surveys utilizing a certified consultant prior to any modification to, or demolition of the buildings or structures within the study area (e.g. APN 014-231-009; 1116 Melrose Ave) that may be altered or demolished to accommodate the planned construction. The survey should include a Health and Safety Plan for worker safety and Work Plan for removal/disposal of asbestos containing material, if encountered. December 2014 Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes Project ii
Buildings constructed prior to 1978 are presumed to contain lead based paints. Conduct lead-based paint surveys utilizing a certified consultant prior to modifications/demolition of any existing buildings or structures within the study area (e.g. APN 014-231-009; 1116 Melrose Ave) that may be altered or demolished to accommodate the planned construction. The survey should include a Health and Safety Plan for worker safety and Work Plan for removal/disposal of lead-based paint, if encountered. Conduct an interior/exterior hazardous materials/hazardous wastes inspection of any existing structures that will be altered or demolished to accommodate the planned construction (e.g. APN 014-231-009; 1116 Melrose Ave). Should the inspections indicate the presence of hazardous materials/hazardous wastes, a Health and Safety Plan for worker safety and Work Plan for removal/disposal of hazardous materials should be prepared, if encountered. If the project area is anticipated to change (due to a change in the proposed project or staging area), further investigation for potential hazardous waste generators would be required to determine their impact to the revised project limits. The project study area is not anticipated to change; therefore, with the exception of the environmental screening described above, no additional Phase I or Phase II investigations are recommended at this time for the proposed project. I declare that to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as defined in 40 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 312. Ryan Neves, PE Professional Registration Date December 2014 Hazardous Waste Initial Site Assessment Placer I-80 Auxiliary Lanes Project iii
EXHIBIT RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Cont.) 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) (Form #) Page 5 of 6 Instructions for Completing the Right of Way Data Sheet To provide complete and consistent data for input into Right of Way s portion of PMCS, the Right of Way Data Sheet and Right of Way Estimate Worksheet will be used. The Right of Way Data Sheet has been designed to accomplish dual purposes: 1) function as an estimating form that is incorporated into the Project Report/Environmental Document as appropriate, and 2) provide essential data for PMCS by entry of Right of Way workload and cost estimates on the EVNT RW, COST RW1, and other PMCS screens for which Right of Way is responsible. Data required to complete Item 1 on the Right of Way Data Sheet is obtained from the totals of various columns on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. All sections of the Right of Way Data Sheet must be completed. If a section is not applicable, it should be so indicated. The following instructions relate to completion of Right of Way Data Sheet Items 1, 2, and 3. The balance of the Right of Way Data Sheet is self-explanatory. Entry 1.A.1. - Entry 1.A.2., 3., and 4. - Entry 1.A.5. - Entry 1.B.1., 2., and 3. - Entry 1.C.1., 2., and 3. - Entry 1.D.1., 2., and 3. - Entry 1.E.1., 2., and 3. - is the total Acquisition cost for the project alternative. It includes acquisition, including excess lands, damages, goodwill, and project permit fees. It is the total of entries 1.A.4. and 1.A.5. 1.A.2. is the grand total of Column 4 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet plus contingency costs. 1.A.3. is the escalation rate for Acquisition activities. 1.A.4. is 1.A.2. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.A.3. is the grand total of Column 15 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. 1.B.1. is obtained from the Utility Information Sheet provided by the Utility Estimator plus contingency costs. 1.B.2. is the escalation rate provided by the Utility Estimator. 1.B.3. is 1.B.1. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.B.2. 1.C.1. is the total of Column 5 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet plus contingency costs. 1.C.2. is the Relocation Assistance escalation rate. 1.C.3. is 1.C.1. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.C.2. 1.D.1. is the total of Column 6 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet plus contingency costs. 1.D.2. is the Clearance/Demolition escalation rate. 1.D.3. is 1.D.1. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.D.2. 1.E.1. is the total of Column 11 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. 1.E.2. is the Title and Escrow escalation rate. 1.E.3. is 1.E.2. escalated to the year of Right of Way Certification using escalation rate 1.E.2.
RIGHT OF WAY DATA SHEET (Cont.) (Form #) EXHIBIT 4-EX-1 (REV 3/2004) Page 6 of 6 Entry 1.F.1. and 2. - Entry 1.G. - Entry 2 - Entry 3.A. - Entry 3.B. - Entry 3.C. - Entry 3.D. - Entry 3.E. - Entry 3.F. - Entry 3.G. - Entry 3.H. - Entry 3.I. - 1.F.1. is the total of the Current Value column of the Right of Way Data Sheet. 1.F.2. is the total of the Escalated Value column of the Right of Way Data Sheet, excluding items 1A4 and 1A5. is the total of Column 10 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. The total estimate for Construction Contract Work is to be reported to Project Development and the Project Manager to ensure inclusion in the projects PS&E. is the anticipated Right of Way Certification date. Each parcel is typed in Column 1 of the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet (see Exhibit 4-EX-3 for definitions of each type). The total of each type is inserted on the appropriate line. Total of all parcels in the estimate. Total should equal the sum of Items X through D in the Type Column. Do not include a double count for dual appraisal parcels. Indicates the number of parcels per type that will require a dual appraisal. Refer to Right of Way Manual, Chapter 7, Section 7.01.07.00, for a definition of parcels requiring a dual appraisal. Utilities workload involvement obtained from the Utility Information Sheet is provided by the Utility Estimator. Refer to Right of Way Manual, Chapter 13, Exhibit 13-EX-6, for definitions of the various utility workload involvements. Railroad workload involvements obtained from the Railroad Information Sheet provided by the Railroad Coordinator. Enter railroad data in both EVNT RW and AGRE Screens. Note: Service Contracts are entered into for both Design and Construction services. Enter the number of each in the appropriate location; the total of both is entered on the Svc Contract line on the Data Sheet. Total RAP displacements. Amount is total of Column 7 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. Clearance/Demolition units. Amount is the total of Column 8 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. Construction Permits include material and disposal sites. Number is the total of Column 9 on the Right of Way Estimate Worksheet. Condemnation Suits. Total number of condemnation suits anticipated in conjunction with the project based on district experience.