General Plan. Page 44

Similar documents
VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

APPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

Housing Element 4th Cycle Programs MATRIX (A Review of Housing Element Implementing Programs)

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

NC 54/I-40 Corridor Master Plan Draft Land Use Blueprint

CITY OF SANTA ROSA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION February 26, 2015 APPLICANT. Citywide FILE NUMBER

City of South San Francisco Page 1 of 5

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015

CITY OF PORT ORCHARD

United States Post Office and Multi-Family Residential; and, Single- Family Residence with an Apartment

2 RELEVANT POLICY DOCUMENTS I. CITY-WIDE DOCUMENTS

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

Implementation. Approved Master Plan and SMA for Henson Creek-South Potomac 103

FUTURE LAND USE. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments

Staff Report & Recommendation Rezoning Case RZ Date of Report: June 6, 2014 Report by: Doug Stacks

ORDINANCE NO. Adopted by the Sacramento City Council Date Adopted

UrbanFootprint Place Types. Urban Mixed Use. Urban Residential. Urban Commercial. Residential 1% SF Large Lot 0%

Mohave County General Plan

Community Development

13 Sectional Map Amendment

forwarddallas! Development Code Amendments Approach Quality of Life Committee Briefing June 11, 2007

Future Land Use Categories & Nodes December 23, Future Land Use Categories

Poughkeepsie City Center Revitalization Plan

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

POLK COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE CASE OVERVIEW

City of Sacramento Zoning Code - Zoning Descriptions Excerpt from website on April 5, 2010

APPENDIX A PART 1: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS

From Policy to Reality

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

SECTION 3. Housing. Appendix A LAND USE DEFINITIONS

ORDINANCE NO

BALTIMORE ZONING CODE: PRELIMINARY ANNOTATED OUTLINE

DIVISION 1 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update

Salem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

ARTICLE B ZONING DISTRICTS

URBANIZATION ELEMENT. PREPARED BY CITY OF MEDFORD PLANNING DEPARTMENT 200 SOUTH IVY STREET MEDFORD, OREGON

Rule of corner may need to be flexible i.e. context school, park. With a clustered approach. Should row housing go where fourplexes are?

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

A. Districts Concept

REGULATING PLAN for the Plaza Saltillo TOD Station Area Plan (SAP)

Table of Contents. Title Page # Title Page # List of Tables ii 6.7 Rental Market - Townhome and Apart ment Rents

PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012

APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS

ZONING Matters. Zoning Determines. Citywide Zoning Workshop April 26, 2010 North Oakland West Oakland North Oakland Hills

City of Palo Alto (ID # 8966) City Council Staff Report

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

DZC and DRMC Amendments to Implement 38th and Blake Station Area Height Amendments

Streamlining Affordable Housing Approvals Proposed Trailer Bill

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

4 LAND USE 4.1 OBJECTIVES

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

NORTHWEST QUADRANT NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY

THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND STRATEGIES

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Unlimited. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

Request. Recommendation. Recommended Motion. Planning Division Department of Community and Economic Development

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

ARTICLE 2 ZONING DISTRICTS AND MAPS

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs

City of Tacoma Zoning Reference Guide

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 21, 2016

Live/Work and Work/Live Code Amendments Staff Analysis Report

2. LAND USE DESIGNATIONS AND PRINCIPLES FOR DEVELOPMENT

The Philadelphia Code. Table : Commercial and Commercial Mixed-Use Districts {For a printable PDF version, click HERE}

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

To: Ogunquit Planning Board From: Lee Jay Feldman, Director of Planning Date: April 18, 2018 Re: Senior/Affordable Multi-Family Housing Assessment

GENERAL DESCRIPTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Plan Area and Current Facilities

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

3 LAND USE. A. Current Land Use

Proposed Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

CHAPTER 21.04: ZONING DISTRICTS...106

Planning Division Department of Community & Economic Development. Applicant: Volunteers of America: Kathy Bray

Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862)

City of Largo, FL: Comprehensive Development Code Chapter 5: Land Use Classifications

Executive Summary Land Use 4-A

CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS MEMORANDUM

DRAFT COUNCIL POLICY DIRECTION CITY OF PALO ALTO SOUTH OF FOREST AREA COORDINATED AREA PLAN PHASE 2

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

LAKE NONA PARCEL 10 & 11

Truckee Development Code User s Guide TOWN OF TRUCKEE. A. Introduction...3. B. Organization of the Development Code 3

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Paul VI Redevelopment

FEC The purpose of the Flexible Use Employment Center classification is to provide for areas of employment uses situated on individual sites or in

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018

891941, , : COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, COMMUNITY PLAN AMENDMENT, AND AREA-WIDE MAP AMENDMENT

Article 4. Zoning Districts

Chapter 6 Future Land Use and Housing Plan

Transcription:

VIII. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USE AREAS POLICY ISSUE Review the City s existing regulations and policies that allow residential land use in non-residential zoning districts. BACKGROUND The City s General Plan and Zoning Code allow for residential development on most nonresidential designated properties. Given past vacancy rates for both office and hotel/motel uses, there have been a number of approved and proposed developments which involve either conversion to residential use (Radisson Villa hotel) or redevelopment of existing office and commercial sites with multi family residential uses (Versailles on El Camino Real, Summerhill Homes at the Visa Campus, Bovet Road Residences at Bovet/Borel Office Campus, North San Mateo Drive Townhomes at the former Shen auto dealership, and Mariner s Island Condominiums at Third and Mariner s Island Boulevard). These proposed land use changes have raised questions about the appropriateness of residential development in non-residential areas. Can the City accommodate future commercial development in the long term if land designated for non-residential use is instead redeveloped for residential purposes? Are there impacts resulting from the redevelopment of large office campus sites to residential land use? Should the City continue to allow residential development as a permitted use on non-residential designated properties, require the approval of a special use permit, or eliminate residential development in non-residential areas? General Plan Prior to adoption of the 1990 General Plan, there were no specific General Plan policies regarding residential development in non-residential zoning districts. The Zoning Code required approval of a special use permit for residential uses in Commercial and Executive Office zoning districts. The 1990 General Plan (pre-measure H) created several Land Use Element and Housing Element policies and text that allowed and encouraged residential development in non-residential districts. The Land Use Element also introduced new land use designations for mixed-use development on non-residential zoned properties, along with increased floor area ratios and building heights for mixed use developments in these land use categories. In addition, there is a section of the Land Use Element called Area Specific Policies in which residential densities are established in specific planning areas of the City. Some of these areas are designated commercial on the Land Use Map. Page 44

Measure H revised some of the text in these policies, mostly to reduce densities, building height, and floor area ratio. The direction to allow residential in non-residential districts not only remained in the General Plan, but some policies and text were incorporated into the language of the Measure H initiative. Measure P maintains sections of the General Plan as approved by the voters under Measure H (see Appendix C). Residential Development Policies The General Plan specifically allows residential development in some non-residential land use categories, and encourages the concept of mixed-use development. The Measure H and Measure P voter initiatives incorporated text supporting residential development in non-residential areas. A portion of the text following Land Use Element Policy LU 1.4 Development Intensity/Density, reads Residential development is also allowed in commercial districts. In addition, the text following Policy LU 1.10 Commercial Development, states, All categories of residential development are allowed in all non-residential land use categories other than the service and industrial categories and those listed as categories 7-11 in part B of Appendix B; except that the maximum density residential category allowed in areas designated as neighborhood commercial is medium-density multi-family. Categories 7 11, in Appendix B, where residential development is precluded by this policy are: Public Facilities, Parks/Open Space, Utilities, Transportation Corridors, and Major Institutions/Special Facility. As such, the General Plan allows residential development in the Neighborhood Commercial, Regional/Community Commercial, Downtown Commercial, Executive Office, and Mixed Use Incentive land use categories. Mixed-Use Development Policies The Land Use and Housing Elements of the General Plan contain policies that encourage mixed-use development. Land Use Element Policy LU 1.8 Mixed Use Commercial-Residential, states: Facilitate housing production by allowing commercial mixed use development which includes multifamily dwellings in all non-residential land use categories except service commercial, manufacturing/ industrial and parks/open space. Land Use Element Policy LU 1.15 Mixed Use, states: Encourage developments which mix commercial retail and office uses with residential uses at locations and intensities/densities as delineated on the Land Use Plan and Building Intensity Plan. Page 45

Housing Element Policy and Program H 2.12 Mixed Use includes the following text: H 2.12: Mixed Use. Continue the policy of encouraging residential uses in existing commercial areas, or in locating adjacent or near transit nodes, where the residences can be buffered from noise and safety concerns and can provide adequate on-site parking and usable open space. Provide floor area and/or height bonuses for residential development in selected areas of the City. Program H 2.12: Mixed Use. 1. Permit the construction of housing or mixed-use projects in commercial areas. Encourage mixed use in specific area plans, the El Camino Real Master Plan, and the San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit-Oriented Development Plan. Consider designation in future plans for Bay Meadows II, and 42 Avenue. 2. Publicize the advantages of constructing housing or mixed-use projects in commercial areas. Publicize the ability to locate residences in commercial areas. The City of San Mateo has developed specific plans to guide future development in various areas of the City. The Bay Meadows Specific Plan, El Camino Real Master Plan, and San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit-Oriented Development Plan include policies promoting mixed-use development. Zoning Code Regulations Based on the policy direction provided in the General Plan, the Zoning Code was revised to allow residential development in commercial and executive office zoning districts as a permitted use, without the requirement for a special use permit. Residential overlay zones were created to encourage mixed use development on non-residentially zoned properties in specific areas of the City. Can the City Change Residential Land Use Policies and Regulations? General Plan text included as part of the Measure H and Measure P voter initiatives specifically allows residential development in Neighborhood Commercial, Regional/Community Commercial, Downtown Commercial, Executive Office, and Mixed Use Incentive land use categories. The text does not specifically state that residential is a permitted or special use. As such, the City may determine the appropriate level of review (non-discretionary permitted use or discretionary special use permit) for residential development in these land use categories, but may not prohibit residential development. Redevelopment of Large Office Campus Sites to Residential Use The issue of residential development in non-residential areas was discussed at the third Public Workshop held on February 15, 2007. Comments received from the public primarily centered on Page 46

the impact of redevelopment from office to residential land use on large office campus sites. These sites are zoned E-1, Executive Park, and generally border established single family and duplex neighborhoods. Residential development is currently permitted at medium density (18 35 units per acre). Concern was expressed that land use changes from office to multi-family residential for these large sites may have impacts on adjacent lower density neighborhoods. In addition, since these sites were initially developed as office campuses, there was a comment that redeveloping a portion of an office site to residential may create land use conflicts between existing office uses and residents of new multifamily residential units within the site area. One public comment suggested that a special permit should be required for residential development on non-residential sites. On February 28, 2007, the TAC discussed this issue and generally agreed that some level of additional review should be required for residential development proposals on large executive office campus sites. Currently, there are no such projects pending before the City. There are some indications that the office market may be coming back which may reduce pressure to redevelop office sites to residential land use, and help to retain the office market in the City. Commercial and Residential Development - Mixed-Use The concept of mixed-use development is encouraged in the General Plan. Residential overlay zones allow additional floor area and building height for developments that include residential units combined with commercial uses in non-residential areas. These overlay zones are mainly located in and around the downtown, along El Camino Real, Twentieth Avenue, and the Mariner s Island area. Residential development on commercial properties and mixed use development on a given parcel have the potential to bring housing and businesses together within commercial areas of the City, which creates opportunities for unique building design and variety in commercial areas, and increased pedestrian activity in a neighborhood. Ideally, the combination of housing and businesses would reduce traffic impacts by allowing residents to live in close proximity to where they work. Public comments at the workshop include the retention of mixed use residential and commercial General Plan policies. In addition, the TAC did not want to discourage mixed use development in commercial areas. Of the 33 residential developments approved between 1992 and August 2007, one development (Delaware Place) was located in a commercial zoning district, while 10 others were proposed on mixed-use designated properties. The Delaware Place site has since been reclassified to a TOD designation as part of the Rail Corridor Plan. Other than residential development in mixed-use areas, there has not been an overwhelming demand for residential land use in commercially designated areas. Page 47

DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATION Since executive office campus sites in the City are located near lower density residential neighborhoods there is the potential for land use conflicts resulting in impacts to adjacent neighborhoods. In addition, these properties are large enough that portions of a campus may be redeveloped to residential, thereby creating potential conflicts between existing offices and new residential dwellings on the same site. Staff is recommending that residential development on E-1, Executive Park, properties be reviewed for land use compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods and City policies. Requiring approval of a special use permit will necessitate findings that the proposed residential development will not have adverse impacts on the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. This level of review will allow decision makers to review the office market citywide prior to making a land use change on a specific property. The requirement for a special use permit will allow for a case by case review of residential development proposals by the Planning Commission as part of the overall public review of a project. It should be noted that the requirement for a special permit adds a level of uncertainty to developers and property owners prior to the public hearing process. Although there is some indication that the office market may be rebounding, it is important to recognize the potential for redevelopment to multifamily residential adjacent to lower density residential neighborhoods. Due to General Plan policies that support and encourage mixed-use development, the potential benefits of design flexibility and pedestrian activity derived from a mixed-use project, and the public discussion at workshops and by the TAC that focused on residential compatibility issues mainly in office campus areas, staff recommends allowing residential development to remain as a permitted use on all other non-residential land use categories as designated in the General Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Amend the Zoning Code to require a special use permit for residential development on E-1, Executive Park, zoned properties. Page 48