Special Fire Tax Rancho Murieta/Sloughhouse Area

Similar documents
New Home Tax Disclosure Report

CORDOVA RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT MEASURE J

County of El Dorado CFD Series 2002 and 2005 Special Tax Bonds. Continuing Disclosure Annual Report. Fiscal Year Ending: June 30, 2014

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

OVERVIEW OF PROPERTY TAX DISASTER RELIEF PROVISIONS September 2015 Governor-Proclaimed State of Emergency

City of Placerville. Cottonwood Park Subdivision Lighting and Landscaping Maintenance District No Fiscal Year 2017/18 Engineer s Report

PROPERTY TAX IS A PRINCIPAL REVENUE SOURCE

CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

EXHIBIT C. Assessor s Parcel or Parcel means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor s Parcel number.

ANNUAL REPORT KATHLEEN KELLEHER ASSESSOR

CITY OF LAFAYETTE ENGINEER S REPORT LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO (RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING) FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018

$990,000 Calaveras County Water District

CALIFORNIA TAX DISCLOSURE REPORT

3. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 29

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. April 14, 2015

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development.

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. December 11, 2018

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

Assessment Overview. Gallagher Amendment Interim Committee. July 13, 2018

ELSINORE VALLEY (ZONE 3) FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA

Administration Report Fiscal Year 2016/2017. Hesperia Unified School District Community Facilities District No June 20, 2016.

County of Santa Clara Finance Agency Controller-Treasurer

Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder and Elections (ACRE)

County of Sacramento Office of the Assessor 2006 Annual Report. Kenneth D. Stieger Assessor

Allegan County Equalization Department

Table of Contents. Sections. Tables. Appendices

Arlington County, Virginia. Internal Audit of the Real Estate Assessment Appeals Process Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2014

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT

Office of Legislative Services Background Report The Revaluation of Real Property: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions About the Revaluation Process

City of New York OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER. Scott M. Stringer COMPTROLLER AUDIT AND SPECIAL REPORTS

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

County of Sacramento Office of the Assessor Annual Report. Kathleen Kelleher Assessor

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

STNL Denny s Main Street, Ramona, CA. Asking Price $2,400,000 Cap Rate 5.0% NOI $120,000

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

Decline in market value and how it may lower your property taxes

Census Tract Data Analysis

SERVICE & IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ASSESSMENT PLAN:

2011 ANNUAL REPORT. 1. The Audited Financial Statements of the Capistrano Unified School District June 30, 2011.

RM.com. Community Recreation and Aquatic Center Ad Hoc Committee Status Report & Preliminary Proposal/Recommendations

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Decline in market value and how it may lower your property taxes

FY 2013 Fair Market Rent Documentation System

EXHIBIT B COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (NORTH VINEYARD STATION NO. 1)

City of Lafayette Staff Report

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

ANNUAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE ANALYSIS OF THE 13 th FLOOR INVESTMENTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN TAMARAC, FLORIDA

DIRECT LEVY LISTING

Riverside County, California Dated: December 8, 2004 Base CUSIP + :

INTRODUCTION MISSION OVERVIEW

Multifamily Property For Sale Asking Price Index Trends

SECOND AMENDED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO

Public Improvement District (PID) Policy

Assessor. Mission Statement: Functions: Long Term Goals: Page 1 of 6

133 RECORDED-SFD LOTS LAKE ELSINORE

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

2016 Annual Report. Carmen Ottmer, Chief Appraiser AUSTIN COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT 906 E. AMELIA ST., BELLVILLE, TEXAS 77418

ITEM F-1 April 23, 2018 Special Rent Board Meeting

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meetings of June 21, 2017 and June 28, 2017.

RESOLUTION NO

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (OJAI)

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 4 - MAINTENANCE OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

To: The Honorable Chair and Members From: Stephanie N.B. Kopplin

TROUBLESHOOTING YOUR CAMA DATA WITH GIS

EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING SERVICES. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, BOUNDARY LINE AGREEMENT, & MERGE (Revised 6/16)

2018 Budget Presentation Assessor s Office. Steve Schleiker, El Paso County Assessor Presentation Date: November 9, 2017

Applying for FY19 Real or Personal Property Abatement

Proposition 218 Notification NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF PUBLIC HEARING ON HILLSIDE ZONE ADDITIONAL SEWER RATE. Name Address City, State, Zip

CHAPTER NINE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. May 19, 2015

Implementing Small Area Fair Market Rents (SAFMRs) in the HCV Program. Plano Housing Authority Case Study

METHODOLOGY GUIDE VALUING OFFICE BUILDINGS IN ONTARIO. Valuation Date: January 1, 2016

The Department s Role

RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSMENT PRACTICES SURVEY

MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH Fifth District Supervisor Hilda L. Solis Supervisor Mark Rid ley-thomas Supervisor Sheila Kuehl Supervisor Don Knabe

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD NO (West Lake Elsinore Public Improvements)

City of Fillmore. Community Facilities District No.5 Improvement Area A (Heritage Valley Parks) $17,155,000 Special Tax Bonds, 2015 Series

Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:

La Palma Professional Building

Subject: Ordinance 1657, Annexation of 3.55 acres of land at 3015 and 3001 Parker Road.

YOUR GUIDE TO THE REASSESSMENT PROGRAM

Regional Open Space Study

February 2014 Legal Calendar

CARRIAGE HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT SUMMARY DESCRIPTION AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AS OF NOVEMBER 2015

INSTRUCTIONS FOR DIRECT CHARGES/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS

New Models for Property Data Verification and Valuation

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

Tax Increment and Special Tax Financing Options for Mixed-Use Development

DIRECT LEVY LISTING

How Did Foreclosures Affect Property Values in Georgia School Districts?

Summary of Private Streets and Street Easements not Maintained by Bexar County. January 12, 2016

COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION ACT Act 210 of The People of the State of Michigan enact:

We hope the trends provide additional perspective on your county s work. We know it provided valuable insight on the work we do here at Revenue.

CITY OF MENIFEE RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SPECIAL DISTRICTS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES

~320 AC. SAN DIEGO CO. OCOTILLO WELLS, CA

Housing Study & Needs Assessment

What s Next for Commercial Real Estate Leveraging Technology and Local Analytics to Grow Your Commercial Real Estate Business

PROPERTY REASSESSMENT AND TAXATION. State Tax Commission Jefferson City, Missouri

Transcription:

Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District Special Fire Tax Rancho Murieta/Sloughhouse Area Boundary & Parcel Review March 2013 Main Office 32605 Temecula Parkway, Suite 100 Temecula, CA 92592 Toll free: 800.676.7516 Fax: 951.296.1998 Regional Office 870 Market Street, Suite 1223 San Francisco, CA 94102 Toll free: 800.434.8349 Fax: 415.391.8439

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1 1. PARCEL INFORMATION 1-1 1.1. District Boundary Map...1-1 1.2. Layered Map of Parcels and District Boundaries...1-2 2. PARCEL DATABASE 2-1 2.1. 2012 Special Tax Roll...2-1 2.2. Potential 2013 Special Tax Roll per Boundary...2-2 Sacramento MFD Boundary & Parcel Review Table of Contents

Executive Summary The Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District (SMFD) hired NBS to assist with the preparation of the annual levy of the Special Fire Tax Rancho Murieta/Sloughhouse Area ( the District ). Following preparation of the 2012 annual levy for the District, NBS recommended a thorough review of the District boundaries be done as no official boundary of the District boundary was available. This review will ensure that all parcels subject to the tax are included in the parcel file. This report represents the preliminary findings of that recommended review. The SMFD reports the District was approved by better than s 2:1 margin by the residents of the Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse communities in November of 2000 (Registrar of Voters records not available to confirm). Based on our analysis of information provided to NBS by the SMFD related to the District, only those parcels within the Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse unincorporated communities should be included in the District annual special tax levy. The goal of this analysis is to verify the boundaries of the Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse unincorporated communities to identify the parcels that should be included in the District levy area. Method of Review To identify all parcels within the District s boundaries, a boundary and parcel audit was performed utilizing a combination of: NBS database of parcels for the District. Sacramento County Secured Property Tax Roll data. Sacramento County GIS. Census data from the U.S. Census Bureau. To identify the boundaries for the District levy area, NBS contacted the Sacramento County Department of Voter Registration and Elections (County Registrar) to obtain boundary information for the District dating back to the year 2000 when the District was approved. NBS continues to pursue the County Registrar for verification of the intended levy area of the District. If an when the boundary map is provided, NBS will incorporate those boundaries into our analysis. Though boundary information from the County Registrar was not available for use in this analysis; information from the U.S. Census Bureau showing representations of the Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse area was available. It is noteworthy that the U.S Census Bureau states: Census designated places (CDPs) are delineated for each decennial census as the statistical counterparts of incorporated places. CDPs are delineated to provide data for settled concentrations of population that are identifiable by name but are not legally incorporated under the laws of the state in which they are located. The boundaries usually are defined in cooperation with local or tribal officials. These boundaries, which usually coincide with visible features or the boundary of an adjacent incorporated place or other legal entity boundary, have no legal status, nor do these places have officials elected to serve traditional municipal functions. CDP boundaries may change from one decennial census to the next with changes in the settlement pattern; a CDP with the same name as in an earlier census does not necessarily have the same boundary. The boundaries obtained were overlaid onto the Sacramento County GIS layer of parcels. This allowed for an accurate representation of the District parcels located within the boundaries of Rancho Murieta and Sacramento MFD Boundary & Parcel Review 1-1

Sloughhouse (according to the U.S Census identified areas). For purposes of determining whether parcels are located within the levy area, all parcels located within the boundaries of the Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse areas, as well as parcels at least intersecting the those same boundaries were included in the list of parcels verified to be within the District. Preliminary findings resulting from this analysis show the following: The NBS database includes 7,399 total parcels, of which 7,125 are classified as taxable, according to the District s Rate and Method of Apportionment, resulting in a total of $712,500 in Special Taxes for the District. A comparison of the NBS database to the Sacramento County GIS data indicate 4,172 parcels of the 7,399 total parcels are located outside of the District Boundaries. The resulting decrease in total revenue would be $416,800 (4,168 of the 4,172 parcels were deemed taxable and levied $100 per parcel). A comparison of the NBS database to the U.S Census Bureau s designated Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse areas indicate there are 3,227 parcels subject to the special tax and 4,172 parcels located outside of the District Boundaries that are not subject to the special tax. The resulting decrease in total revenue would be $416,800 (4,168 of the 4,172 parcels were deemed taxable and levied $100 per parcel). Of the 3,227 parcels that are located within the District boundaries 2,957 are classified as taxable per the RMA resulting in a projected Special Tax Levy of $295,700. A review of the historical levy records sent to the County by SMFD also show the area levied through tax year 2004/05 for the District is consistent with the Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse boundaries represented in this report. Beginning with tax year 2005/06, the historical levy records indicate the area levied more than doubled in size and included nearly twice the number of parcels. Included in the added territory were parcels within the cities of Folsom and Sacramento among other areas outside the District. This conclusively demonstrates the areas added were done so in error. Recommendation Unless SMFD annexed any territory outside of Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse into the District, SMFD should limit the future years levies to the parcels found within the Rancho Murieta and Sloughhouse area, as shown in this report in Section 2.2. Potential 2013 Special Tax Roll per Boundary. Sacramento MFD Boundary & Parcel Review 1-2

1. Parcel Information Parcel information represented in the following sections has not been audited and was prepared using Sacramento County Secured Property Tax Roll data and GIS information. 1.1. District Boundary Map The following page shows a map representing the boundaries of the Sacramento Metro Fire District as well as the areas including the Sloughhouse and Rancho Murieta Communities. Sacramento MFD Boundary & Parcel Review 1-1

1.2. Layered Map of Parcels and District Boundaries The following page shows a map representing the following. Area Boundaries o Outlined in Red: the Sacramento Metropolitan Fire District boundaries. o Outlined in Orange: boundaries for Rancho Murieta o Outlined in Blue: Boundaries for Sloughhouse Parcel Representations o Assessor s Parcels shaded in Green: Parcels effectively within the boundaries of either Sloughhouse or Rancho Murieta and therefore eligible to be taxed in the Special Fire District. o Assessor s Parcels shaded in Gray: represents Assessor s parcels that have been levied that appear to be outside the boundaries of Sloughhouse or Rancho Murieta. Sacramento MFD Boundary & Parcel Review 1-2

2. Parcel Database 2.1. 2012 Special Tax Roll The following pages show the 2012 fiscal year special tax roll, sorted by assessor s parcel number, and including APN, 2012/13 levy amount, owner name, site address, and use descriptions. Sacramento MFD Boundary & Parcel Review 2-1

2.2. Potential 2013 Special Tax Roll per Boundary The following pages show the potential 2013 special tax roll if the Special Fire Tax District boundaries are confirmed to be only the areas represented as Sloughhouse and Rancho Murieta. Sacramento MFD Boundary & Parcel Review 2-2