RESOLUTION NO. FILE NOS. PD & ABC17-001

Similar documents
SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW DATE: October 19, 2016

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. T15-058

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. PT14-047

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT:

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT:

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. PT15-066

EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION NO. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 587 SQ.FT. RD:EEH:LCP

City of San Juan Capistrano Supplemental Agenda Report

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division

SANjOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, a map showing the location of such territory is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference; and

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

CITY OF MERCED Planning & Permitting Division STAFF REPORT: #15-03 AGENDA ITEM: 4.3

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

CITY OF SAN DIMAS PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

Memorandum /14/17. FROM: Harry Freitas TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. DATE: February 9, 2017 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. Date.

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Chair Barron, Vice-Chair Brittingham, Commissioner Keith, and Commissioner Rush. Mathew Evans, Community Development Director

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Planning Commission Report

#87 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA. For the Agenda of: December 10, 2013 Time: 10:15 a.m. Board of Supervisors. Department of Community Development

RD:JVP:JMD 01/10//2017 RESOLUTION NO.

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Planning Commission. DATE: September 28, 2015 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3

high turnover sit down restaurant ( Super Duper Burgers) with outdoor seating and beer and wine

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P

City of Huntington Beach Community Development Department STAFF REPORT

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

RESOLUTION NO. R

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A NEW COUNCIL POLICY No ENTITLED SURPLUS SALES

CHAPTER XVIII SITE PLAN REVIEW

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

ORDINANCE NO. 1_8_0_1_0_3_

RESOLUTION NO. PC

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO. RD:SSG:LJR 7/24/2017

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

ORDINANCE NO. _ _

[Q] R5-4D 127-5A209. Central City

City of Escondido Zoning Administrator

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 ORDINANCE No CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

1. The reason provided for the opposing votes was that the two commissioners wanted something else to be developed on their parcel.

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 624 Oak Lawn Avenue

Planning Commission Report

PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

Planning Director Boise City Planning and Development Services Department. CUP (Adoption of Findings & Revised Conditions of Approval)

STAFF REPORT. City of Ormond Beach Department of Planning. Exception for Outdoor Activity

CITY OF MONTEBELLO Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 W. Beverly Boulevard Montebello CA

Protective Covenants. Large Rail Site Phase 1

RESOLUTION NO

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

ZONING ORDINANCE TOWN OF MOUNTAIN CITY

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER 4.46 AND SECTION OF CHAPTER 4

PC RESOLUTION NO. 15~11-10~01 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP)

VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK

A GUIDE TO PROCEDURES FOR: SUBDIVISIONS & CONDOMINIUM CONVERSION

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

TOWNSHIP OF MANALAPAN ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, on April 8, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No to establish parkland fees for secondary units; and

RESOLUTION PC NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Duarte resolves as follows:

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 716 Oak Lawn Avenue

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

;:ft{n Siegel, City Manager

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

CITY OF STOCKTON PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

CITY OF ENCINITAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: April 17, 2013

CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT:

BUTTE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (LAFCO) EXECUTIVE OFFICER S REPORT. LAFCo File City of Chico Extension of Services 16 Mayfair Drive

ARTICLE XI CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS

The City Council makes the following findings:

Dated October 14, 1966 As to Acknowledged October 14, 1966 University Hills No. 2 Subdivision Reported October 18, 1966 Liber 1954, Page 28

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the Signal Hill Gateway Center has been developed in phases. overtime; and

Planning Commission Report

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603

BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANET REESE, PLANNER II

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of San José ( City ) has an interest in promoting affordable housing within the City; and

DU PAGE COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JACK T. KNUEPFER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 421 NORTH COUNTY FARM ROAD, WHEATON, ILLINOIS 60187/

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS, A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND GRANTING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY TO ALLOW THE OFF-SALE OF ALCOHOL (ABC TYPE 21 LICENSE) OF A FULL RANGE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AT A 42,640 SQUARE FOOT FULL-SERVICE GROCERY STORE (H-MART) ON A 7.5- GROSS ACRE SITE LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MURPHY AVENUE AND OAKLAND ROAD (1710 OAKLAND ROAD) FILE NOS. PD16-038 & ABC17-001 WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 20.100 of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code, on December 7, 2016, an application (File Nos. PD16-038 & ABC17-001) was filed by the applicant, H-Mart San José LLC, with the City of San José for a Planned Development Permit and a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to allow the off-sale of alcohol (ABC Type 21 License) of a full range of alcoholic beverages at a 42,640 square foot full-service grocery store (H-Mart) on a 7.5 gross acre site, on that certain real property situated in the A(PD) Planned Development Zoning District and located at the northeast corner of Murphy Avenue and Oakland Road (1710 Oakland Road, which real property is sometimes referred to herein as the subject property ); and WHEREAS, the subject property is all that real property more particularly described in Exhibit "A," entitled Legal Description, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference as if fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 20.100 of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code, the Planning Commission conducted a hearing on said application on May 24, 2017, notice of which was duly given; and 1 Council Agenda: 06-27-17 DRAFT Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) 535-1260 or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov for

WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Planning Commission gave all persons full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence and testimony respecting said matter; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council respecting said matter based on the evidence and testimony; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 20.100 of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code, this City Council conducted a hearing on said application, notice of which was duly given; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, this City Council gave all persons full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence and testimony respecting said matter; and WHEREAS, at said hearing this City Council received and considered the reports and recommendations of the City s Planning Commission and City s Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement; and WHEREAS, at said hearing, this City Council received in evidence a development plan for the subject property entitled, H Mart North Park Plaza," dated received on May 3, 2017, said plan is on file in the Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement and is available for inspection by anyone interested herein, and said plan is incorporated herein by this reference, the same as if it were fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, said public hearing before the City Council was conducted in all respects as required by the San José Municipal Code and the rules of this City Council; and 2

WHEREAS, this City Council has heard and considered the testimony presented to it at the public hearing, and has further considered written materials submitted on behalf of the project applicant, City staff, and other interested parties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT: After considering all of the evidence presented at the Public Hearing, the City Council finds that the following are the relevant facts regarding this proposed project: 1. Site Description and Surrounding Uses. The 7.5 gross acre site is located at the northeast corner of Murphy Avenue and Oakland Road and is developed with a 76,697 square foot shopping center. The shopping center includes the vacant 42,640 square foot former grocery store, restaurant uses, a Kinko s, and a small gym, and 398 parking spaces. There are multi-family residential uses to the north and east, a commercial shopping center to the west and an office park to the south. There are two other full-service grocery stores within a half mile radius of the project site (i.e., 99 Ranch and Sprouts Market). 2. Project Description. On December 7, 2016, the applicant applied for a Planned Development Permit (PD) to allow for off-sale of alcohol for a future supermarket (H- Mart) to be located within the existing 42,640 square foot vacant former grocery store structure. On February 1, 2017, the applicant applied for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to allow the off-sale of alcohol (ABC Type 21 License) of a full range of alcoholic beverages at the proposed full service grocery store (H-Mart) on a 7.5 gross acre site in the A(PD) Planned Development Zoning District. As a fullservice grocery store, H-Mart will sell a full range of grocery products including meat, dairy, dry goods, baked goods, and fresh produce, as well as the proposed full service off sale alcohol. The off-sale of alcohol would consist of an approximately 200 square foot portion of the store (approximately 0.5% of the total gross floor area) in an area located at the rear of the grocery store. The hours of operation for H Mart are 8:00 am to 11:00 pm every day. The building was previously occupied by SF Supermarket and PW Market with the former having an ABC Type 21 liquor license. Pursuant to Table 20-260 contained in Section 20.100.220 of the San José Municipal Code, the Planning Director is generally the initial decision-maker for Planned Development Permits. However, this Planned Development Permit requires Planning Commission review and recommendation to the City Council, because the subject site is located in an area that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of reported crimes for the City as a 3

whole and Planning Commission recommendation of public convenience or necessity is required pursuant to Section 6.84.030 of the San José Municipal Code. Therefore, the City Council is the initial decision maker on this project. The Planned Development Permit is needed to allow for the off-sale of alcohol for a future grocery store. 3. General Plan Conformance. The proposed project site has an Envision San José 2040 General Plan Land Use/Transportation Diagram designation of Neighborhood/Community Commercial. This category supports a very broad range of commercial activity, including commercial uses that serve the surrounding community, such as neighborhood serving retail and services and commercial/professional office development. The proposed Planned Development Permit would allow a use that will provide retail services to the community, and is consistent with the following General Plan policies: a. Goal LU-5 Neighborhood Serving Commercial: Locate viable neighborhoodserving commercial uses throughout the City in order to stimulate economic development, create complete neighborhoods, and minimize vehicle miles traveled. Analysis: The project site is located within walking distance to existing residential uses and provides commercial uses to the benefit of nearby residents. The grocery store with off-sale of alcohol will occupy a vacant tenant space that was formerly a full-service grocery store, replacing a former neighborhood serving retail use. b. Neighborhood Serving Commercial Policy LU-5.1: In order to create complete communities, promote new commercial uses and revitalize existing commercial areas in locations that provide safe and convenient multi-modal access to a full range of goods and services. Analysis: The grocery store with off-sale of alcohol will move into a tenant space that has been vacant for at least a year, and was formerly a full-service grocery store with full service off-sale of alcohol, and therefore, will revitalize the existing commercial center. The grocery store with off-sale of alcohol will provide a full range of goods in addition to the off-sale of alcohol, including meat, dairy, dry goods, baked goods, and fresh produce in a convenient location adjacent to residential uses. c. Neighborhood Serving Commercial Policy LU-5.5: Encourage pedestrian and vehicular connections between adjacent commercial properties with reciprocalaccess easements to encourage safe, convenient, and direct pedestrian access and one-stop shopping. Encourage and facilitate shared parking arrangements through parking easements and cross-access between commercial properties to minimize parking areas and curb-cuts. 4

Analysis: The off-sale of alcohol at the grocery store will allow patrons to participate in one-stop shopping by offering the convenience of being able to provide a wide range of groceries and products in addition to the off-sale of alcohol. The parking lot is part of the larger commercial shopping center and the 398 parking spaces are shared amongst the site tenants. d. Vibrant Neighborhoods Policy VN-3.1: Encourage the location of full service grocery stores within or adjacent to neighborhoods with limited access to healthful foods with the goal that all San José residents be able to live within a ½ mile walking distance of a full service grocery store. Analysis: The new grocery store with full service of off-sale of alcohol will provide another full service grocery store option to surrounding residential uses. Sprouts Market is located across the street from the project site; however, the range of products are different between the Sprouts Market and the future H-Mart grocery store. H-Mart offers a variety of international products in addition to fresh produce, and bread and provides different types of international products for the community. The new grocery store along with the off-sale of alcohol will provide nearby residents with another option to obtain their groceries and is closer to the adjacent residential neighborhood. e. Neighborhood Serving Commercial Policy LU-5.10: In the review of new locations for the off-sale of alcohol, give preference to establishments that offer a full range of food choices including fresh fruit, vegetables, and meat. Analysis: H-Mart will offer a range of fresh foods from fresh fruit, vegetables, meat, dairy, bakery, deli, and other products (i.e., international products) consistent with this policy. Furthermore, the proposed project will only be allowed to implement the off-sale of alcohol in conjunction with a full service grocery store. The off-sale of alcohol would consist of an approximately 200 square foot portion of the store (approximately 0.5% of the total gross floor area) in an area located at the rear of the grocery store. 4. Zoning Ordinance Compliance. As stated above, the proposed project is located in the A(PD) Planned Development Zoning District, which requires a Planned Development Permit for the off-sale of alcoholic beverages per the Planned Development Zoning file number PDC96-042. This Planned Development Zoning, which was approved by the City Council on August 20, 1996, states the following, All conditional uses of the C-1 Commercial Zoning District will be subject to subsequent Planned Development Permit/Amendment(s). The off-sale of alcoholic beverages is a conditionally permitted use in the C-1 zone, therefore, the subject application is a Planned Development Permit. There are not any physical alterations proposed as part of the project. The existing development meets the development standards contained in the 1996 Planned Development Zoning District. The setback requirements are as follows: 5

- Setback from Murphy Road = 20 feet - Setback from Oakland Road = 30 feet - Setback from Lakepark Drive = 10 feet - Setback from Site II (residential uses off Oakland Road) = 5 feet The existing structure is approximately 272 feet from Oakland Road, approximately 167 feet from Murphy Road, approximately 311 feet from Lakepark Drive and approximately 31 feet from Site II. The parking requirement is 398 parking spaces and the project site is providing 398 parking spaces. Lastly, the maximum height is 45 feet, one story. The existing building is one story. Therefore, the existing structure meets all of the above development standards in the Planned Development Zoning District. 5. Environmental Review. Under the provisions of Section 15301 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, this project is found to be exempt from the environmental review requirements of Title 21 of the San José Municipal Code, implementing the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (CEQA). The Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) exemption applies to the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency s determination. Examples include but are not limited to: a) interior or exterior alteration involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyance. The proposal qualifies for this exemption as the proposed off-sale of alcohol, is located in a 200 square foot area within an existing structure. The proposed use will occur inside of the grocery store and does not require expansion of the building. 6. Planned Development Permit Findings. The City Council concludes and finds, based on the analysis of the above facts in regards to this Planned Development Permit and Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity, that: a. The Planned Development Permit, as issued, is consistent with and furthers the policies of the General Plan; and b. The Planned Development Permit, as issued, conforms in all respects to the Planned Development Zoning of the property; and c. The Planned Development Permit, as approved, is consistent with applicable City Council policies, or counterbalancing considerations justify the inconsistency; and d. The interrelationship between the orientation, location, mass and scale of building volumes, and elevations of proposed buildings, structures and other uses on-site are appropriate, compatible and aesthetically harmonious; and 6

e. The environmental impacts of the project, including, but not limited to noise, vibration, dust, drainage, erosion, storm water runoff. And odor which, even if insignificant for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), will not have an unacceptable negative effect on adjacent property or properties. Analysis: As described in detail in the staff report and above, the project is consistent with and furthers the policies of the General Plan. As described in the Zoning Ordinance Compliance section above, off-sale of alcohol requires a Planned Development Permit. The existing structure meets all of the development standards approved in the 1996 Planned Development Zoning District, as discussed in the Zoning Ordinance Compliance section above. The project is consistent with the Public Noticing City Council Policy as the on-site sign has been posted on the property since January 3, 2017. The project is not proposing any physical alterations to the site and is requesting the off-sale of alcohol. The Police Department is neutral to the issuance of the Planned Development Permit as stated in the Police Department memorandum dated December 20, 2016. The off-sale of alcohol is compatible with the other uses on-site as it is part of a larger retail use (i.e., a grocery store) located in a larger shopping center with other retail and commercial uses. As discussed above, the project site had two previous supermarkets occupy the tenant space (i.e., SF Supermarket and PW Supermarket) with the former tenant selling full-service off-sale alcohol. Lastly, the use would not have any environmental impacts on the environment as the offsale of alcohol is fully contained in a 200 square foot area within the existing building and would not generate additional noise, vibration, dust, drainage, erosion, storm water runoff or odor. Based on the above analysis, all of the above general findings related to the Planned Development Permit can be made. 7. Off-sale of Alcohol Findings. Pursuant to Section 20.80.900 of the Municipal Code, a use permit may be issued pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance for the off-sale of any alcoholic beverages only if the decision-making body first makes the following three findings, if applicable, to the off-sale of alcoholic beverages: a. For such use at a location closer than five hundred (500) feet from any other use involving the off-sale of alcoholic beverages, situated either within or outside the City, that the proposed location of the off-sale of alcoholic beverages use would not result in a total of more than four (4) establishments that provide alcoholic 7

beverages for off-site consumption within a one-thousand (1,000) foot radius from the proposed location. Analysis: There are no other uses involving the off-sale of alcoholic beverages within a 500 feet radius of the proposed site. There is one off-sale establishment (Sprouts Market, Type 20, beer and wine) within 1,000 feet of the proposed site. Therefore, this finding can be made. b. For such use at a location closer than five hundred (500) feet from any other use involving the off-sale of alcoholic beverages, situated either within or outside the City, where the proposed location of the off-sale of alcoholic beverages use would result in a total of more than four (4) establishments that provide alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption within a one thousand (1,000) foot radius from the proposed location, that the resulting excess concentration of such uses will not: i. Adversely affect the peace, health, safety, morals, or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area; or ii. Impair the utility or value of property of other persons located in the vicinity of the area; or iii. Be detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare. Analysis: As stated above, there are no other uses involving the off-sale of alcoholic beverages within a 500 foot radius of the proposed site, and there is only one off-sale establishment (Sprouts Market, Type 20, beer and wine) within 1,000 feet of the proposed site. Therefore, the proposed use will not result in more than four establishments that provide alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption within a 1,000 foot radius of the proposed location. Further, the Police Department is neutral on the proposed off-sale of alcohol and the full service grocery store with off-sale of alcohol will meet many General Plan polices as described above. Therefore, this finding is not applicable. c. For a proposed use at a location closer than five hundred (500) feet from any child care center, public park, social service agency, residential care facility, residential service facility, elementary school, secondary school, college or university, or closer than one hundred fifty (150) feet from any residentially zoned property, that the building in which the proposed use is to be located is situated and oriented in such a manner that would not adversely affect such residential, child care center, public park, social service agency, residential care facility, residential service facility and/or school use. Analysis: The proposed site is not located closer than 500 feet from any child care center, public park, social service agency, residential care facility, residential service facility, elementary school, secondary school, or college or university. The project site is within 150 feet from residential units and residentially zoned 8

properties. However, the rear and side of the building face the residential use and is separated by a wall and private streets (Lakeshore Circle and Elm Lake Court). The wall does not have any pedestrian openings from Lakeshore Circle. The wall does contain a pedestrian opening from Elm Lake Court; however, the distance from the closest residential building to the entrance of the grocery store is approximately 240 feet. There are also residential uses located south of the project site located off Murphy Avenue. However, the distance from the entrance of the grocery store and the pedestrian path of travel to the closest residential use is approximately 935 feet. Therefore, this finding can be made. 8. Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity Findings. Under California Business and Professions Code Sections 23958 and 23958.4, the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) must deny an application for a liquor license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if the issuance would result in or add to an undue concentration of liquor licenses in the area, unless the City determines that the public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of the license (Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity). An undue concentration is defined as follows: a. The premises of the proposed license are located in an area that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of reported crimes for the City as a whole, or b. The premises of the proposed license are located in a census tract where the ratio of existing retail off-sale licenses to population in the census tract exceeds the ratio in the County as a whole. Analysis: The San José Police Department reviewed the proposed project and presented their findings in a memo dated December 20, 2016. The memo states that the project site is located within an area that has 20 percent greater number of reported crimes than the average number of reported crimes for the City as a whole. Therefore, for the ABC Department to be able to issue a license for this off-sale use, the City must grant a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN). The analysis of the proposal is based on the required findings identified in Title 6 of the San José Municipal Code. Chapter 6.84 of the San José Municipal Code identifies the process and findings related specifically to the off-sale of alcohol and specifies that the Planning Commission may issue a PCN only after first making the specified factual findings identified below: 1) The proposed use is not located within a strong neighborhoods initiative or neighborhood revitalization area or other area designated by the city for targeted neighborhood enhancement services or programs, or located within an area in which the chief of police has determined based upon quantifiable 9

information that the proposed use: (a) would be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare of persons located in the area; or (b) would increase the severity of existing law enforcement or public nuisance problems in the area; and Analysis: The proposed use is not located within a Strong Neighborhoods Initiative (SNI) area. The Police Department is neutral to the issuance of the Planned Development Permit, as the project site is not listed in an area which is considered to be unduly concentrated with alcohol sales. In addition, the proposed project would provide another full-service grocery store to the neighborhood area, and off-sale of alcohol would comprise only 200 square feet of store space within the larger 42,640 square-foot grocery store building (approximately 0.5% of the grocery store space). As previously mentioned, there were two previous supermarkets that sold alcohol located at the project site. This finding can be made. 2) The proposed use would not lead to the grouping of more than four offpremises sale of alcoholic beverage uses within a one thousand-foot radius from the exterior of the building containing the proposed use; and Analysis: There is only one off-sale use (Sprouts Market) within a 1,000 foot radius of the site. This finding can be made. 3) The proposed use would not be located within five hundred feet of a school, day care center, public park, social services agency, or residential care or service facility, or within one hundred fifty feet of a residence; and Analysis: The proposed use is not located within 500 feet of a school, day care center, public park, social services agency, or residential care or service facility. The proposed use, however, is within 150 feet of a residence. Therefore, this finding cannot be made. 4) Alcoholic beverage sales would not represent a majority of the proposed use. Analysis: Approximately 0.5% percent of the total floor area is proposed to be used for the sale of alcohol for off-site consumption. Accordingly, the offsale use represents an ancillary and incidental component to the primary grocery store use that provides a full range of grocery products and does not represent a majority of the overall use. Therefore, this finding can be made. 5) At least one of the following additional findings must be made: a) The census tract in which the proposed outlet for the off-premises sale of alcoholic beverages is located is unusually configured and the proposed outlet would act as a convenience to an underserved portion of the 10

community without presenting a significant adverse impact on public health or safety; or Analysis: This finding cannot be made as the census tract in which the proposed outlet for the off-premises sale of alcoholic beverages is not unusually configured. b) The proposed outlet for the off-premises sale of alcoholic beverages would enhance or facilitate the vitality of an existing commercial area without presenting a significant adverse impact on public health or safety; or Analysis: The off-premise alcohol sales, which can only operate in conjunction with a full service grocery store as conditioned, will provide another option for residents to purchase meat, dairy, fresh produce and dry goods. The Police Department is neutral on the issuance of the Planned Development Permit and the off-premise alcohol sales will be fully contained in an existing building located in an existing commercial shopping center. Therefore, this finding can be made. c) The census tract in which the proposed outlet is located has a low population density in relation to other census tracts in the city, and the proposed outlet would not contribute to an over- concentration in the absolute numbers of outlets for the off-premises sale of alcoholic beverages in the area; or Analysis: The proposed project would not contribute to an overconcentration in the area as the area is not currently over-concentrated, therefore, this finding can be made. d) The proposed off-premises sale of alcoholic beverages is incidental and appurtenant to a larger retail use and provides for a more complete and convenient shopping experience. Analysis: This finding can be made because the off-premise sale of alcoholic beverages is incidental and appurtenant to a grocery store. If however, the Planning Commission cannot make one or more of the first four findings listed above (Findings 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4), then the Planning Commission shall make a recommendation to the City Council as to whether the Council should make a determination for the proposed use. Analysis: Given the above-stated analysis, all but one of the findings for PCN can be made by the Planning Commission for the proposed off-sale of alcohol. The Planning Commission cannot make Finding 8.3 as the proposed use is within 150 feet of a residence. However, the Planning Commission can make findings 5.b, 5.c, and 5.d of the additional findings for a PCN determination. The 11

majority of the site will be used as a grocery store, and the sale of alcohol is incidental to the overall use of the site. Because the Planning Commission cannot make the Finding 8.3, the project must proceed to City Council for a decision. Based on all of the foregoing, the City Council identifies and finds that a significant and overriding public benefit or benefits will be provided by the proposed use. The off-sale of alcohol meets the General Plan goals and policies of (i) providing walkable grocery stores with a broad array of goods to the community; (i) jobs, employment, and economic development by activating a vacant structure; (iii) giving preference to off-sale of alcohol to stores that also provides fruits, vegetables, and healthy products; and (iv) the conditions of approval will make sure the off-sale will not have any significant impact on the community. In accordance with the findings set forth above, a Planned Development Permit and a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to use the subject property for said purpose specified above and subject to each and all of the conditions hereinafter set forth is hereby approved. This City Council expressly declares that it would not have granted this Determination and Permit except upon and subject to each and all of said conditions, each and all of which conditions shall run with the land and be binding upon the owner and all subsequent owners of the subject property, and all persons who use the subject property for the use conditionally permitted hereby. CONDITIONS 1. Acceptance of Permit. Per Section 20.100.290(B) of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code, should the permittee fail to file a timely and valid appeal of this Planned Development Permit within the applicable appeal period, such inaction by the permittee shall be deemed to constitute all of the following on behalf of the applicant: a. Acceptance of the Permit by the permittee; and b. Agreement by the permittee to be bound by, to comply with, and to do all things required of or by the permittee pursuant to all of the terms, provisions, and conditions of this Permit or other approval and the provisions of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code applicable to such Permit. 2. Permit Expiration. This Planned Development Permit shall automatically expire two (2) years from and after the date of issuance hereof by the City Council, if within such time period, a Building Permit has not been obtained or the use, if no Building Permit is required, has not commenced, pursuant to and in accordance with the provision of this Permit. The date of issuance is the date this Permit is approved by the City Council. However, the Director of Planning may approve a Permit Adjustment/Amendment to extend the validity of this Permit in accordance with Title 12

20 of the San José Municipal Code. The Permit Adjustment/Amendment must be approved prior to the expiration of this Planned Development Permit. 3. Sewage Treatment Demand. Chapter 15.12 of Title 15 of the San José Municipal Code requires that all land development approvals and applications for such approvals in the City of San José shall provide notice to the permittee for, or recipient of, such approval that no vested right to a Building Permit shall accrue as the result of the granting of such approval when and if the City Manager makes a determination that the cumulative sewage treatment demand of the San José-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility represented by approved land uses in the area served by said Facility will cause the total sewage treatment demand to meet or exceed the capacity of San José-Santa Clara Regional Wastewater Facility to treat such sewage adequately and within the discharge standards imposed on the City by the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the San Francisco Bay Region. Substantive conditions designed to decrease sanitary sewage associated with any land use approval may be imposed by the approval authority. 4. Conformance to Plans. The development of the site shall conform to the approved Planned Development Permit plans entitled, H Mart North Park Plaza, dated received on May 3, 2017, on file with the Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement, as may be amended subject to City s approval, and to the San José Building Code (San José Municipal Code, Title 24), as amended. The plans are referred to herein as the Approved Plan Set. 5. Use Authorization. This Planned Development Permit and Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity authorizes the off-sale of alcohol (ABC Type 21 License) of a full range of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption, to be implemented only in conjunction with a full service grocery store, as defined in Condition of Approval No. 7. 6. Alcoholic Beverage Control. The off-sale of alcoholic beverages shall only be allowed in strict conformance with the requirements of the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC). The permittee shall maintain full compliance and in good standing with the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. 7. Limitations on Area of Alcohol Sales. The sale of alcohol for off-site consumption allowed by this Permit shall be limited and incidental to the primary use of a full service grocery store. Full service grocery store as used herein means a retail establishment that provides a full and wide complement of fresh produce, grains, dairy goods, and baked products, together with other food and household merchandise for general public consumption. The area in which alcoholic beverages are displayed or otherwise offered for sale shall not exceed 0.5% percent of the total floor area of the retail area that is open and accessible to the general public (i.e., excluding backroom storage and office spaces). Alcohol product displays shall not be placed outside the retail tenant space. 13

8. Building Permit/Certificate of Occupancy. No change in the character of occupancy or change to a different group of occupancies as described by the Building Code shall be made without first obtaining a Certificate of Occupancy from the Building Official, as required under San José Municipal Code Section 24.02.610, and any such change in occupancy must comply with all other applicable local and state laws. 9. Compliance with All Laws. The subject use shall be conducted in full compliance with all local, state, and federal laws and regulations. No part of this approval shall be construed to permit a violation of any part of the San José Municipal Code. 10. Discretionary Review. The Director of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement maintains the right of discretionary review of requests to alter or amend structures, conditions, or restrictions of this Permit incorporated by reference in accordance with Chapter 20.100 of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code. 11. Disturbance Coordinator. The permittee shall implement the following: a. Provide an on-site disturbance coordinator during all hours of operation; b. Post contact information for the disturbance coordinator in a prominent location within the establishment near the primary entrance; c. Maintain a complaint log including the time and content of all complaints and a summary of the time and nature of the establishment s response to each complaint; a. Ensure that the log is kept current and is available on the project site for inspection by City staff. 12. Nuisance. This use shall be operated in a manner that does not create a public or private nuisance. Nor shall the use adversely affect the peace, health, safety, morals or welfare of persons residing or working in the surrounding area or be detrimental to public health, safety or general welfare. Any such nuisance shall be abated immediately upon notice by the City. 13. Anti-Litter. The site and surrounding area shall be maintained free of litter, refuse, and debris: d. Cleaning shall include keeping all publicly used areas free of litter, trash, cigarette butts and garbage and shall include daily damp washing of all exterior walls and sidewalks along the project's frontage. e. The permittee of the proposed use shall clean the public right-of-way immediately adjacent to the subject site before 8:00 a.m. each day. a. Mechanical equipment used for outside maintenance, including blowers and street sweepers shall not be used between 10:00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m. daily. 14

14. Anti-Graffiti. The property owner or property management company shall remove all graffiti from buildings and wall surfaces of the grocery store area within 48 hours of defacement. 15. Loitering. Loitering shall not be allowed in the public right-of-way adjacent to the subject site. 16. Refuse. All trash areas shall be effectively screened from view and covered and maintained in an orderly state to prevent water from entering into the garbage container. No outdoor storage is allowed / permitted unless designated on the approved plan set. Trash areas shall be maintained in a manner to discourage illegal dumping. 17. Noise. Noise shall be contained within the buildings and the buildings shall be adequately insulated to prevent excessive sound from emanating outside. Adequate HVAC (air conditioning) shall be provided to allow all doors and windows on the subject site to remain closed during the operation and activities of the site. 18. Lighting. No new on-site lighting is approved through issuance of this Permit. 19. Sign Approval. No signs are approved at this time. All proposed signs shall be subject to review and approval by the Director of Planning through a subsequent Permit Adjustment. 20. Revocation, Suspension, Modification. This Planned Development Permit may be revoked, suspended or modified by the Planning Commission, or by the City Council on appeal, at any time regardless of who is the owner of the subject property or who has the right to possession thereof or who is using the same at such time, whenever, after a noticed hearing in accordance with Part 2 of Chapter 20.100 of Title 20 of the San José Municipal Code it finds: // // // // a. A violation of any conditions of the Planned Development Permit was not abated, corrected or rectified within the time specified on the notice of violation; or b. A violation of any City ordinance or State law was not abated, corrected or rectified within the time specified on the notice of violation; or c. The use as presently conducted creates a nuisance 15

In accordance with the findings set forth above, a permit to use the subject property for said purpose specified above is hereby approved. ADOPTED this day of, 2017, by the following vote: ATTEST: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: TONI J. TABER, CMC City Clerk SAM LICCARDO Mayor NOTICE TO PARTIES The time within which judicial review must be sought to review this decision is governed by the provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. 16

EXHIBIT "A" (File No. PD16-038) EXHIBIT "A" NORTH PARK PLAZA PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER CENTER LEGAL DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION OF OF THE CENTER CENTER Real property In In the City of San Jose, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as as follows: follows: PARCEL ONE: ONE: SHOWN ON ON THAT MAP OF OF TRACT NO. 8948, 8948, FILED FOR RECORD ALL OF LOTS 1 1 THROUGH 6, INCLUSIVE, AS SHOWN RECORD ON IN BOOK 692 OF OF MAPS AT PAGES PAGES 27-31, 27-31, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS. AUGUST 08,1997, 08, 1997, IN PARCEL TWO: TWO: EASEMENTS AND RELATED RIGHTS AS AS PROVIDED PROVIDED IN GRANT OF STORM STORM DRAIN DRAIN EASEMENT AND AND MAINTENANCE 11,1990 225, PAGE 1121; AND AND IN BOOK L 225, 225, PAGE PAGE 1128; AGREEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 11, 1990 IN BOOK L 225, GRANT OF INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RECORDED RECORDED JANUARY 11,1990 IN 11, 1990 IN BOOK LL255, 255, PAGE 1134; 1134; GRANT OF OF RECIPROCAL INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT AND AND MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE RECORDED JANUARY 11,1990 PAGE 1138; GRANT OF OF SEWER EASEMENTS AND AGREEMENT RECORDED 11, 1990 IN BOOK L 225, PAGE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT RECORDED RECORDED JANUARY 11,1990 1142, AS AMENDED BY 11, 1990 IN BOOK L 225, PAGE 1142, QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED JULY 19, 19,1994 PAGE 1954.; 1954; QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED RECORDED JULY 1994 IN BOOK N 522, PAGE 19,1994 IN IN BOOK N 522, 522, PAGE 1957 AND AND MODIFICATION MODIFICATION OF EASEMENT RECORDED JULY 19, 19,1994 1994 IN BOOK N 522, PAGE PAGE 1960, OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL THREE: THREE: AND EGRESS AS AS GRANTED GRANTED IN THAT CERTAIN EASEMENT A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND 17,1997, UNDER RECORDER'S SERIES NO. NO. 13742913, OFFICIAL RECORDS AGREEMENT RECORDED JUNE 17,1997, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT POINT ON THE THE GENERAL SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT NO. 8236, 8236, DISTANT THEREON THEREON NORTH NORTH 37 15' 59" 59" WEST 235.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF FROM THE lineof MURPHY AVENUE AS SHOWN ON ON SAID TRACT NO. 8236; 8236;THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF SAID BOUNDARY, BOUNDARY, AS AS SAID SAID BOUNDARY ADJUSTED PER DOCUMENT NO. 13530109, BOUNDARY WAS ADJUSTED. SANTA CLARA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, NORTH 37 15' 59. WEST 27.00 FEET; FEET; THENCE THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SAID CONTINUINGALONG 52 44' 01"u WEST 143.92 FEET; FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SAID BOUNDARYSOUTH BOUNDARY SOUTH 55" ADJUSTED BOUNDARY SOUTH 5r44'Ol WEST143.92 55 54' 20 20"11 WEST69.14 WEST 69.14 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY FEETiTHENCEWESTERLYALONGACURVETOTHE RIGHT, CONCAVENORTHEASTERLY RADIUS OF OF 53.00 53.00 FEET THROUGH THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE ANGLE OF OF 86 49'41" FOR AN AN ARC LENGTH LENGTH OF 80.32 WITH A RADIUS FEET; THENCE NORTH NORTH 37 15 37 15'1 59"WESI 59" WEST 6.91 6.91FEET; FEET; THENCE THENCE WESTERLY AL()NG ALONG A CURVE TO THEtEFT, THE LEFT, 11 CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLYWITHARADI'YS SOUTHWESTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 47.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF OF 23 23" 51' ACENTRALANGLE 51 1 18" FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 19.57 FEET; THENCENORTH THENCE NORTH 61.07'.17" 61 07' 17". WEST258.34FEET;THiENCE WEST 258.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY AN.ARC1ENC;TH THE LEFT,CONCAVESOUTHERLYWITH LEFT, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY WITH ARADIUS A RADIUS OF 10.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ALONG A CURVE TO THE 11 31" AN ARC LENGTH LENGTH OF 10.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 59 32'.12" 32' 12" WEST 25.62 25.62 FEET TO ANGLE OF 59 20' 31 FOR ANARC 10.36 FEET; SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF TRACT NO. 8236 THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY NORTH 6r 61 07' 17" WEST 13.97 13.97 FEET AND NORTH NORTH 29 29 56' 17" WEST 13.98 13,98 FEET; THENCE THENCE LEAVING 07'17'1 1 SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY NORTH NORTH 59 59 32' 7.07 FEET; THENCE THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO TO 32 12" EAST 7.07 THE LEFT, LEFT, CON CONCAVE A RADIUS OF 10.00 FEET THROUGH THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 110 110 02' 13" CAVE WESTERLY WITH ARADIUS 1311 49 Landlord HMart North Park Plaza San Jose, CA. mv Tenant DRAFT--Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) 535-1260 or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov for

EXHIBIT "A" (File No. PD16-038) FOR A FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 19.21 19.21 FEET; FEET; THENCE ALONG A REVERSE REVERSE CURVE TO THE RIGHT, CONCAVE EXHIBIT "A" CURVE NORTHEASTERLY NORTHEASTERLY WITH A A RADIUS RADIUS OF 76.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43 27' 56" 56" FOR AN ARC ARC LENGTH LENGTH OF 58.21 58.21 FEET; FEET; THENCE ALONG A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT, LEFT, CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY WITH A RADIUS 22 51* RADIUS OF 57.00 FEET FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2r 51' 12" 12" FOR FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 22.79 FEET; FEET; THENCE NORTH 29 56' 17" WEST 123.66 FEET 29 56' FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT NO. NO. 82365; 82365; THENCE NORTH 59 32' 12" EAST ALONG SAID LINE; THENCE SOUTH 29 32'12" EAST 26.00 FEET ALONG 29 56' 17" EAST 123.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, RIGHT, CONCAVE WESTERLY WITH A RADIUS RADIUS OF 83.00 FEET THROUGH A A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 22 2r 54' 12" FOR AN ARC LENGTH LENGTH OF 33.18 FEET; FEET; THENCE ALONG A REVERSE CURVE TO THE LEFT, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY WITH A RADIUS OF 50.73 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54 61 07' 17" EAST 294.9SFEET; 294.95 FEET; THENCE 54 05' 12" FOR AN ARC ARC LENGTH OF 47.89 FEET; THENCE SOUTH SOUTH61 07'17" ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY, WITH A RADIUS OF 73.00 FEET THROUGH A A CENTRAL ANGLE OF OF 23 51' 18" FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 30.39 FEET; FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37 15' 59" EAST 6.91 6.91 51'18" 37 15' FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, WITH A RADIUS RADIUS OF 27.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE ANGLE OF 86 49' 41" FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 40.92 FEET; 55 54' 86 49' FEET; THENCE NORTH 55 20" EAST 68.42 FEET; FEET; THENCE NORTH 52 44' 01" SOUTH 37 15' 59" EAST 53.00 EAST68.42 Olil EAST 174.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH FEET; THENCE SOUTH SOUTH 52 44' 01" WEST 31.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. APN(S): 244-37-002 (Portion (Portion of Lot 3),244-37-003 3), 244-37-003 (Portion (Portion of Lot 4), 244-37-004 (Portion (Portion of Lot 4),244-37-006 4), 244-37-006 4),244-37-004 (Lot 5), 244-37-008 (lot (Lot 6), 244-37-010 (Lot 1), 244-37-015 (lot 2) and 244-370-16 (Portion (Portion of Lot 3) 3) 5),244-37-008 6),244-37-010 i), 244-37-015 50 50 Landlord Landlord San Jose, CA Tenant HMart H Mart North Park North Park Plaza Plaza * DRAFT--Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) 535-1260 or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov for