The City of Los Altos Building Square Footage Calculations Used for Determining Parking Requirements November 4, 2015 ATTACHMENT F

Similar documents
Chapter DENSITY AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS

Element Z General Design Requirements Owner Standards and Other Requirements

ORDINANCE NO

THIS IS THE TITLE OF THE DOCUMENT. What You Should Know About CRE Leases

1935 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

GENERAL ZONING CODE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MULTIPLE- DWELLING DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT Study Session for Consideration of Proposed Development Requiring General Plan, Zoning Code and/or Downtown Precise Plan Amendments

Commercial Tenant Representation Glossary

{ ( ' INCENTIVES & BONUSES

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:

Pentagon Centre (SP#297) PDSP & Phase I Site Plan Amendments SPRC #1

Text Amendment July 29, Charlotte - Mecklenburg Planning Department

NAPERVILLE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM

4 LAND USE 4.1 OBJECTIVES

City of Santa Monica Inclusionary Housing Policy

For Lease 2,000 Rentable SF includes 480 SF of Shipping Container Space and 1,500 SF of Outdoor Dining & Patio Area

1133 West Georgia Street By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

Commercial Real Estate Terminology

How to get your city off its parking addiction Downtown Glendale s story

Shattuck Avenue

TEXOMA MEDICAL PLAZA - PHASE II 5012 SOUTH U.S. HWY 75 DENISON, TX

RETAIL RESTAURANT OFFICE SPACE FOR LEASE

Administrative Procedures for the collection of Development Impact Fees

TW PATTERSON BUILDING - RETAIL

Determination. Reception: Andrew Junius. information: Site Address:

Chapter 14C - INCLUSIONARY HOUSING [42]

GUIDELINES FOR COMPLYING WITH THE CITY OF SAN JOSE INCLUSIONARY HOUSING POLICY IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREAS. July 1, 2007

CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE AND ANALYSIS

FLOOR AREA REPORT GUIDE

Exhibit A 1525 Industrial Street Camden Industrial Lofts Project

West 1st Avenue By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

A Brief Overview of the New BOMA Measurement Standards for Lawyers Jan. 20, 2011 By William B. Tracy, MBA, NCARB

Howard 0** Basement

Cambridge Ordinance Committee Zoning Submission Overview 8/2/2017

RODE. Article 80 Small Project Review Application. 232 Old Colony Avenue Mixed Use Development 232 Old Colony Avenue South Boston, MA 02127

ITEM F-1 April 23, 2018 Special Rent Board Meeting

Rules and Regulations

Streamlining the Entitlement Process for Transit-Oriented Development

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

Stewart School: Scenario 1

In response to concerns raised by the speakers at the planning commission hearing on this matter, please note:

KIMBELL ART MUSEUM - LOUIS KAHN Forth Worth, Texas THE UNPROGRAMMED Gijs Loomans

TW PATTERSON BUILDING - RETAIL

OPTION 1 MAX RENOVATION/ADDITION

467 FIRST STREET Three-Story Class A Boutique Office Plaza Development

AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE TO EXTEND TEE SUNSET PROVISION OF LOS ALTOS HILLS MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION

Chapter BAC (BURLINGAME AVENUE COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Pre-Leasing Now! Prime Retail Spaces in the Newly Redeveloped. Hotel Concord and. Concord Telephone Company Exchange Building

DALLAS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT DCAD VALUATION PROCESSES

Response to the Santa Clara County Civil Grand Jury Report Affordable Housing Crisis Density Is Our Destiny

FOR SALE 3520 and 3533 Watson Rd, St. Louis, MO 63139

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 11, 2018 Staff Report to the Planning Commission

City of Blue Springs, Missouri. Main Center Redevelopment Corporation Incentive Policy

Office Space for Lease

I BEVERLY HILLS. Planning Commission Report

3.1 PZ / 20 W. Northwest Highway / Nicholas & Associates / Plat of subdivision and conditional use for a final planned unit development

Room & Floor Renumbering. Floor Level Numbering Room Renumbering

SECTION 5: ACCESSORY USES

9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue

CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT:

WE MAKE YOUR HEALTHCARE REAL ESTATE WORK FOR YOU COMMON TRANSACTIONAL COMPLIANCE PITFALLS INVOLVING HEALTHCARE REAL ESTATE

1200 Alberni Street By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

SUSSEX PROFESSIONAL CENTER

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (OJAI)

First International Bank & Trust Building

Review Authority. CMC Section (D) requires that applications for a Site Plan Review be reviewed by the commission at a public hearing.

DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee

LAKE JONATHAN FLATS 1 1/14/2017

Extension of the Moratorium on the Application of the Interim Density Bonusing Policy No. O-54 in Surrey City Centre

Date: January 9, Strategic Housing Committee. IZ Work Group. Legacy Homes Program

PIPE (E) BELL HOP ELEVATOR GREENLEAF AVENUE EDGE OF HISTORICAL BLDG. BUILDING "B" EXIT -30" +0" GREENLEAF ENTRY EXIT EXIT BUILDING "C"

TOWN OF PALM BEACH Town Clerk's Office

REESA TANSEY Lic

PORTFOLIO GLENDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE ORBEL MANGASAR

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: JULY 6, 2017

Cambridge Planning Board Zoning Submission Overview 7/25/2017

40, ,000 RSF AVAILABLE Full Floors from 21,000 RSF

GSA FORM 1364 PROPOSAL TO LEASE SPACE INSTRUCTIONS

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. Proposed Five-Story, 50-Unit Multiple-Family Building at 4856 El Camino Real

Compatible-Scale Infill Housing (R-2 Zones) Project

F O U R A D D R E S S E S, O N E G R E AT L O C AT I O N

OWNER/USER COMMERCIAL OFFICE BUILDING 1610 Beverly Blvd Los Angeles, CA

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Comparative chart on Berkeley proposed Downtown zoning initiative June 20, 2014

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance

95 Merchant Drive Unit B1, D&E Montrose, Colorado 81401

FROM: General Manager, Planning and Development FILE: The Planning and Development Department recommends that Council:

Eastgate Office Park BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT


ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS

(Ord. No , 7, 4/17/12; Ord (8) (part), 6/17/08)

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DRI #260 - WIREGRASS RANCH (NOPC #4) PASCO COUNTY

SAN MATEO UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT. Site Recommendation Alternative High School Program December 13, 2017

Discuss the history of fires that resulted in much of the development of codes related to means of egress. Review mean of egress terminology

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

Transcription:

The City of Los Altos Building Square Footage Calculations Used for Determining Parking Requirements November 4, 2015 ATTACHMENT F

Background A number of city approved projects have used building square footages that are different than those filed with the city in determining the amount of parking required for a specific project. This has resulted in a number of recently approved projects being under parked. The city currently uses net building square footage to calculate parking requirements, building square footage, and traffic fees paid. Many times the parking requirements become a more significant factor in determining building size than zoning does. As a result, parking trumps zoning. Currently a net building square footage is used that includes some exempted building components, in determining the number of parking spaces required and traffic impact fees to be paid to the city. ~

Discussion Building floor areas have been an acceptable formula for determining maximum building square footage and other design components for many years. Building square footage is an accepted method used to determine community impact and parking requirements in addition to building height and mass. These current rules have not been applied evenly when it comes to calculating the required parking spaces for a building or use and traffic impact fees for the project. This results in the surrounding community paying the price for under parked projects. A standardized building square footage calculation should be used for both calculating the required parking spaces and traffic impact fees. By creating a better standardized net building square footage definition we believe we can apply these rules with better consistency when it comes to: Determining parking requirements Calculating traffic impact fees Encouraging beneficial architectural features Encouraging outdoor dining Other uses ~

Discussion Continued We recommend that the city modify what is counted in the net building square footage when determining parking requirements. We ve found in surrounding communities that the more exemptions there are in net building square footage calculations, there is a higher car count per thousand used in calculating the amount of parking required. A building whose net building square footage car count is lower, typically includes the square footage of: Stairwells Elevators Mechanical/Electrical Rooms Restrooms Etc. ~ However, if we were to remove all of these elements from the calculation it would result in a higher parking requirement.

Discussion Continued Could we use the parking square footage calculations as incentive for developers to, for example, create bigger lobbies or other architectural features to enhance the building without increasing the parking requirement? Additionally we could exempt architectural features and wall thickness greater than 10 from the net building square footage calculation. Further consideration is needed on how outside dining is included in the parking requirements for restaurants or outside sales. A simple approach may be to have building square footage calculations that city staff uses for net building square footage match the net building square footage used for parking requirements by providing a very clear list of building area types (stairs, lobbies, elevators, etc.) that are exempt for the calculation. ~ This approach would eliminate confusion for both planning staff, the general public, and developers.

Recommendation #1 Modify how net building square footage is counted for purposes of determining the amount of parking that is required and the traffic impact fees required for a specific use or project. ~

Recommendation #2 Start the process by using the gross building square footage calculations as the baseline. Do not include the following building elements in the net building square footage calculations for the purposes of determining the number of car spaces required or city fees paid: Stairwells Elevators Elevator fire rated lobbies Mechanical rooms Mechanical shaft enclosures Electrical rooms Trash enclosures Restrooms Ground floor entries/lobbies (up to 250 sq.ft. of the ground floor public lobby area) Architectural features Wall thickness in excess of 10 if the thickness is used for purposes of creating architectural features ~

Recommendation #3 Allow a review mechanism as an incentive for developers to create larger lobbies or other architectural features that enhance the building without increasing parking requirements. This incentive could be part of the design review application process. ~

Recommendation #4 Create an inspection process whereby planning staff inspects the building at completion of construction to ensure that architectural features that were considered exempt from the building square footage parking requirements are not then converted to useable office/retail space, etc. that constitutes a change in use. Any change in use would be subject to increased parking requirements and other applicable zoning requirements. ~

Recommendation #5 Allow a partial exemption (50% of the total seating provided on site) of outdoor dining square footage used for dining purposes in calculations of parking required through a use permit process for the outdoor dining square footage on private property. Allow a partial exemption (25% of the total seating provided in public right of way) of outdoor dining square footage, used for dining, within the public right of way. For example, a downtown restaurant has 2,000 sq.ft. of enclosed restaurant space, 1,000 sq.ft. of outside space on private property, and 500 sq.ft. of public right of way space for seating. The resulting parking requirements would be as follows: 2,000 sq.ft. enclosed - 7.2 cars (per thousand) x 2 = 14.4 cars 1,000 sq.ft. outside - 7.2 cars (per thousand) x 1 = 7.2 x 0.50 outside dining space = 3.6 cars 500 sq.ft. public right of way - 7.2 cars (per thousand) x 0.5 = 3.6 cars x 0.25 public right of way = 0.9 cars Total = 18.9 cars This approach would encourage restaurants to add outside dining to their project designs. The in-lieu fee program may be used for meeting outdoor seating parking requirements. ~