five Design Over- lay Districts OVERLAY A Historic Side Setbacks and Small Lot Development in Residential Zone Districts OVERLAY B

Similar documents
Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

AGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

ORDINANCE NO

Denver Zoning Code Text Amendment #3 Slot Home Text Amendment PLANNING BOARD REVIEW REDLINE DRAFT 3/13/18

Accessory Structures Zoning Code Update-, 2015

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE

Article 7. URBAN CENTER (C-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

City Wide Design Guidelines Attachment A Proposed Ordinance

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

DIVISION 1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

Compatible-Scale Infill Housing (R-2 Zones) Project

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.

These design guidelines were adopted by: Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission on August 10, 2000 Knoxville Historic Zoning

Staff Report and Recommendation Based on the criteria for review in the Denver Zoning Code, Staff recommends approval for application #2017I

APPENDIX E PAGE 1 of 25 NOTE: ITALICS INDICATE ADDITIONS OR ALTERATIONS RM-9, RM-9A, RM-9N AND RM-9AN GUIDELINES DRAFT

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

A By-law to amend Zoning and Development By-law No regarding Laneway Houses

RM-8 and RM-8N Districts Schedule

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

Development Requirements in the Residential Zoning Districts

Article 2. Rules of Interpretation

BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Better Housing by Design - Proposed Draft Summary

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

PART 11 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES

3.1 Existing Built Form

INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS

Residential Design Guide Appendices

RM-7, RM-7N and RM-7AN Districts Schedules

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE33.3, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on June 26, 27 and 28, 2018 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW -2018

Chapter Residential Mixed Density Zone

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

this page left intentionally blank DENVER ZONING CODE

DIVISION 7. R-6 AND R-6A RESIDENTIAL ZONES* The purpose of the R-6 residential zone is:

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

PLNPCM : Attached Garage Regulations for Residential Districts ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT

DISCUSSION DRAFT 3 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Chapter 10 RD TWO-FAMILY (DUPLEX) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE

Article Zoning District Regulations

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District

Missing Middle Housing in Practice

RT-5 and RT-5N Districts Schedule

Accessory Dwelling Units

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

DIFFERENCES IN THE EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING CODE IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

June 22, 2005/Calendar No. 14

2ND DISCUSSION DRAFT 3 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

TOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages

SLOT HOME T A S K F O R C E M E E T I N G # 1 P A C K E T

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

5. Housing. Other Relevant Policies & Bylaws. Several City-wide policies guide our priorities for housing diversity at the neighbourhood level: Goals

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone

TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE PETERS TOWNSHIP PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUNE, E. McMURRAY ROAD McMURRAY, PA 1531 (724)

City of Chico Title 19 Land Use & Development Regulations TND Zone

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

RT-11 and RT-11N Districts Schedules

2 OVERVIEW & GUIDE. 2.1 ZONING ATLAS OVERVIEW...9 Zoning Districts 9 Transit Areas 10 Pedestrian Streets 10

Redline Document Conventions

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

SECTION 10.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES

SECTION 7. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Accessory Coach House

SECTION 73 CHESTER VILLAGE DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Bulk Requirements (For other supplementary location and bulk regulations, see Article VII.)

City of Fraser Residential Zoning District

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed. November 2009 COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS. Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No.

Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings

City of Dade City, Florida Land Development Regulations ARTICLE 5: DENSITY, INTENSITY & DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS

Accessory Dwelling Units

INTRODUCTION ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS -- GENERAL PURPOSE STATEMENT APPLICABILITY... 3

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT VARIANCE AND WAIVER THE ROSALYNN APARTMENTS

Introduction. General Development Standards

Land Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee of Denver City Council FROM: Scott Robinson, Senior City Planner DATE: December 6, 2018 RE:

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

SECTION 7. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS. By Palmisano

Overview. Central Street Master Plan. Appendix B: Zoning


CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

38 th & Blake Height Amendments: Public Meeting #5 Building Design Comments July 13 th, 2016

9. MIXED HOUSING TYPES AND AFFORDABILITY

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS

Transcription:

The Highland Neighborhood has developed over more than 14 years. The result is that Highland has a variety of street and block patterns, some orthogonal, some diagonal, and some irregular (Scottish Village). Lot sizes and shapes vary, depending on the particular block. Shops, houses, duplexes, row houses, and apartments are interspersed on blocks throughout the neighborhood. Highland is diverse, with consistent development patterns that started in the 19th Century. These development patterns are the foundation for Highland s unique neighborhood context. Two features of the predominant development pattern are narrow side yard setbacks between buildings and small lots. Highland's unique neighborhood context has made it one of the most popular and desirable neighborhoods in Denver. As Highland experiences intense new development and the renovation of existing structures, new planning criteria and standards need to recognize, reinforce, and continue development patterns that are part of the neighborhood s distinct character, allowing new development that meets the current and future needs of a thriving but changing neighborhood In some cases, the new Denver zoning code does not allow preservation of these development patterns. For example, the Urban Neighborhood Context that has been applied to most of Highland presumes that block sizes and shapes are consistent, lot sizes are consistent within an area, streets are orthogonal and building coverage accommodates consistent yards. While these are characteristic of other parts of Denver that developed later in the first half of the 0th Century, these are not consistent with the development of Highland. Unfortunately, zoning requirements that perform the important function of preserving the characteristics of other neighborhoods make it impossible to preserve the unique and valued characteristics of the Highland Neighborhood. To preserve and reinforce the historical context of Highland, five Design Overlay Districts are proposed for the Highland neighborhood. These Overlay Districts are intended to simplify the process for renovating and developing buildings that fit into our neighborhood better. The proposed Overlay Districts are shown on the attached maps: OVERLAY A Historic Side Setbacks and Small Lot Development in Residential Zone Districts OVERLAY B Historic Side Setbacks and Small Lot Development in Scottish Village OVERLAY C Historic Small Lot Corner Store Side Setbacks in Main Street, Mixed Use and Multi-Unit Zone Districts. OVERLAY D -Story Height Exception in Zone District OVERLAY E Historic Development Forms in Potter Highlands DRAFT November 014

N FEDERAL BLVD N DECATUR ST N CLAY ST N ALCOTT ST N LYLE CT N TEJON ST N PECOS ST N SHOSHONE ST N QUIVAS ST N NAVAJO ST N MARIPOSA ST N KALAMATH ST N JASON ST N INCA ST W CLYDE PL W 7TH AVE W 6TH AVE W 6TH AVE W 8TH AVE R- M 0 W 7TH AVE A B INTERSTATE HOV N FO X ST W TH AVE W 4TH AVE W ND AVE M W DOUGLAS PL R- M M W 4TH AVE W RD AVE W ARGYLE PL N SPEER BLVD N BRYANT ST X RH-. W CAITHNESS PL M RH-. W DUNKELD PL N FIRTH CT M N ZUNI ST W 8TH AVE W 1ST AVE W 0TH AVE RH- M M RH-. R-M0 17TH ST ERIE ST 16TH ST. 18TH ST KENSING CT R- CENTRAL ST BOULDER ST 19TH ST W 7TH AVE

N FEDERAL BLVD N DECATUR ST N CLAY ST N ALCOTT ST N LYLE CT N TEJON ST N PECOS ST N SHOSHONE ST N QUIVAS ST N NAVAJO ST N MARIPOSA ST N KALAMATH ST N JASON ST N INCA ST W CLYDE PL W 7TH AVE W 6TH AVE W DENVER PL W 6TH AVE W 8TH AVE R- M 0 W 9TH AVE W 7TH AVE A B INTERSTATE HOV N FO X ST W TH AVE W 4TH AVE W ND AVE M W DOUGLAS PL KEY R- M M Proposed Design Overlay District A Highland Areas Outside of District A Highland Areas Zoned or Old Zoning with Waivers W 4TH AVE W RD AVE W ARGYLE PL N SPEER BLVD N BRYANT ST X RH-. W CAITHNESS PL M RH-. W DUNKELD PL N FIRTH CT M N ZUNI ST W 8TH AVE W 1ST AVE W 0TH AVE RH- M M W 7TH AVE RH-. R-M0 17TH ST ERIE ST 16TH ST. 18TH ST KENSING CT R- CENTRAL ST BOULDER ST 19TH ST Overlay Map A Includes the following zoning areas: Two Unit B () allows up to two units on a minimum zone lot area of 4,00 square feet. Allowed building forms are the urban house, detached accessory dwelling unit, duplex and tandem house building forms. Two Unit B () allows up to two units on a minimum zone lot area of 4,00 square feet with additional units allowed on corner lots subject to location restrictions. Allowed building forms are the urban house, detached accessory dwelling unit, duplex and tandem house building forms. Rowhouses are also allowed on certain corner lots. Row House. (RH-.) RH-. is a multi unit district that allows up to a two and a half story rowhouse building form. It also allows the urban house, detached accessory dwelling unit, duplex, and tandem house building forms.

RD AVE. BETWEEN ALCOTT ST. AND BRYANT ST. Late 19th century buildings in Highland often have setbacks of less than '. But current zoning calls for a combined side setback of 10' on lots wider than 1'. This will disrupt the historic pattern. Overlay A Historic Side Setbacks and Small Lot Development in Residential Zone Districts Area: and Zone Districts east of Zuni street in the Highland Neighborhood.* Existing Characteristics: Many buildings constructed in the late 19th Century in the areas zoned and in Highland have narrow (often less than ft.) interior side setbacks. Garages and carriage houses are often built to a zero side yard setback in the rear third of lots. Carriage houses generally mimic the form of the primary house on a lots. Problems: and zoning requires a combined side interior setback for residential structures of 10 feet on lots wider than 1 ft. When redevelopment occurs, these large side setbacks would destroy the historic pattern of buildings along the streets by creating large, uncharacteristic gaps between buildings. While garages in the rear 1/ of a lot are allowed to abut side property lines without a setback, Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) structures are not allowed this same setback for the garage portion of the building on the ground floor, discouraging development of affordable housing units. ADUs are being proposed that do not follow the half-story diagram shown in Denver Zoning Code Figure 1.1-. Proposed Overlay A For the following building forms: 1. Urban House. Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit. Duplex 4. Tandem House Proposed Zoning Code Modifications: (see Exhibits AI III) On lots 0 feet or less in width, the minimum side interior setback shall be feet. Minimum side interior setbacks for the garage portion of an Accessory Dwelling Unit may use a zero foot setback that is identical to the minimum side interior setbacks for the Detached Garage building form. The half-story upper level of ADUs shall follow the language of 1.1...B. and the gable or hip roof form shown in Figure 1.1-. * Areas in the Zone District that are Excluded from Design Overlay A: There are parts of Highland that developed later in time with relatively uniform lot sizes and building placement where bungalow is the predominant building form. These homogenous areas have been identified and have been excluded from the Design Overlay District A. Draft November 014

plan perspective aerial Existing Condition 6 < commonly less than < Current Zoning 4 Proposed Overlay 9 I. Side Yard Setback Draft November 014

STREET Figure 1.1- Half Story Minimum Floor to Ceiling Distance. ADU Roof Form Draft November 014 4

Existing Condition Current Zoning (garage) ALLEY EXISTING GARAGES BACK YARD ZERO SIDEYARD SETBACK NO SIDEYARD SETBACK TO GARAGE IF IN REAR 1/ OF LOT Current Zoning (ADU) Proposed Overlay ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) GARAGE GARAGE PERMIT ZERO LOT LINE DEVELOPMENT FOR GROUND LEVEL GARAGE PORTION OF ADU MORE USABLE OPEN SPACE Purpose: Garages are allowed to be built zero lot line to the side yard setback, but garages below Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are not. In Highland, it would make sense to permit the ground level garages below a second story ADU to be built zero lot line against a side property line. The ADU above must be set back ' from the side property line, consistent with the current code. III. ADU Side Yard Setback Draft November 014

N FEDERAL BLVD N DECATUR ST N CLAY ST N ALCOTT ST N LYLE CT N TEJON ST N PECOS ST N SHOSHONE ST N QUIVAS ST N NAVAJO ST N MARIPOSA ST N KALAMATH ST N JASON ST N INCA ST W CLYDE PL W 7TH AVE W 6TH AVE W DENVER PL W 6TH AVE W 8TH AVE R- M 0 W 9TH AVE W 7TH AVE A B INTERSTATE HOV N FO X ST W TH AVE W 4TH AVE W ND AVE M W DOUGLAS PL KEY R- M M Proposed Design Overlay District B Highland Areas Outside of District B Highland Areas Zoned or Old Zoning with Waivers W 4TH AVE W RD AVE W ARGYLE PL N SPEER BLVD N BRYANT ST X RH-. W CAITHNESS PL M RH-. W DUNKELD PL N FIRTH CT M N ZUNI ST W 8TH AVE W 1ST AVE W 0TH AVE RH- M M W 7TH AVE RH-. R-M0 17TH ST ERIE ST 16TH ST. 18TH ST KENSING CT R- CENTRAL ST BOULDER ST 19TH ST Overlay Map B Includes the following zoning areas: Row House. (RH-.) RH-. is a multi unit district that allows up to a two and a half story rowhouse building form. It also allows the urban house, detached accessory dwelling unit, duplex, and tandem house building forms.

Typical character of Scottish Village on West Caithness Place between Zuni St. and Fife Ct. Small homes with tiny side setbacks on shallow lots Draft November 014 Overlay B Historic Side Setbacks and Small Lot Development in Scottish Village Area: RH-. Zone District within the Scottish Village boundaries of West nd Avenue, Zuni Street, West Dunkeld Place, and Clay Street in the Highland neighborhood. Existing Characteristics: This area, originally developed in the late 1800 s, has historically dense development with greater building coverage than in other parts of Highland and in many other Denver neighborhoods. Curving streets and narrow alleys define a broad variety of lot sizes and shapes. Lots on a block vary in width, depth, and shape. Most lots have very narrow or nonexistent side yards. On shallow lots, two-story buildings often extend into the rear % of lots. Backyards are often very small or non-existent. Garages and off-street parking occupy the area behind many houses and demand for off-street parking has increased as the availability of on-street parking in the neighborhood has decreased. To provide outdoor living area, roof-top and second-story rear decks are a common feature. Problem: The dense residential development on curving streets and small, shallow lots is historically unique to Scottish Village. Current zoning of this area prevents reasonable development and improvements compatible with its historic development patterns. ADUs are being proposed that do not follow the half-story diagram shown in Denver Zoning Code Figure 1.1-. The new zoning code does not apply Lot Coverage Limits to the Rowhouse Form, creating an incentive for scraping existing homes and combining lots to develop new rowhouses. Proposed Overlay B For the following building forms: 1. Urban House. Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit. Duplex 4. Tandem House Proposed Zoning Code Modifications: (see Exhibit BIII) The minimum side interior setback shall be feet. Maximum building coverage allowed shall be 0%. There shall be no reduction in lot coverage for detached garages or accessory dwelling units. On existing shallow lots, defined as lots platted prior to the adoption of the current zoning code, with at least one side lot line less than or equal to 90 ft.: - Height limits and bulk limits established for the front 6% of the lot shall apply to the rear %. - Rooftop and/or rear second story level decks shall be allowed in the rear % of the lot. (Lots replatted after enactment of this design overlay district that assemble a shallow lot with an adjacent lot or subdivide existing parcels do not qualify); Minimum side interior setbacks for the garage portion of an Accessory Dwelling Unit may use a zero foot setback that is identical to the minimum side interior setbacks for the Detached Garage building form. The half-story upper level of ADUs shall follow the language of 1.1...B. and the gable or hip roof form shown in Figure 1.1-. For the following building forms: 1. Rowhouse Proposed Zoning Code Modification: Maximum building coverage allowed shall be 0%. 6

plan perspective aerial Existing Condition EXISTING COVERAGE VARIES: UP TO 60% commonly less than shallow lots less than 90 deep Current Zoning % LOT COVERAGE, or if lot wider than 1 90 lower bulk plane in rear % of lot Proposed Overlay 0% LOT COVERAGE for all lots 90 allow normal bulk plane at rear % of shallow lots I - 1. Lot Coverage Side Yard Setback Shallow Lots Draft November 014 7

STREET Existing Condition Current Zoning Proposed Overlay shallow lots less than 90 deep 90 lower bulk plane in rear % of lot 90 allow normal bulk plane at rear % of shallow lots Figure 1.1- Half Story Minimum Floor to Ceiling Distance I - 1 IV. Lot Coverage Side Yard Setback Shallow Lots Draft November 014 8

N FEDERAL BLVD N DECATUR ST N CLAY ST N ALCOTT ST N LYLE CT N TEJON ST N PECOS ST N SHOSHONE ST N QUIVAS ST N NAVAJO ST N MARIPOSA ST N KALAMATH ST N JASON ST N INCA ST W CLYDE PL W 7TH AVE W 6TH AVE W 4TH AVE W ND AVE M W DOUGLAS PL KEY W DENVER PL R- M M Proposed Design Overlay District C Highland Areas Outside of District C Highland Areas Zoned or Old Zoning with Waivers W 6TH AVE W TH AVE W 4TH AVE W RD AVE W ARGYLE PL N SPEER BLVD N BRYANT ST X RH-. W CAITHNESS PL M RH-. W DUNKELD PL N FIRTH CT W 8TH AVE N ZUNI ST M W 8TH AVE W 1ST AVE W 0TH AVE RH- M M W 7TH AVE RH-. R-M0 W 9TH AVE 17TH ST ERIE ST 16TH ST. 18TH ST KENSING CT R- CENTRAL ST BOULDER ST 19TH ST W 7TH AVE R- M 0 Main Street () applies to areas or intersections served primarily by local streets embedded within an existing or proposed neighborhood where a building scale of 1 to stories is desired. The district is intended to provide for appropriate locations for traditional corner commercial establishments located within a residential neighborhood. Main Street () applies primarily to local or collector street corridors, or may be embedded within a commercial shopping center or mixed-use area, where a building scale of 1 to stories is desired. A B INTERSTATE HOV N FO X ST Overlay Map C Includes the following zoning areas: Mixed Use () applies to areas or intersections served primarily by local or collector streets where a building scale of 1 to stories is desired. Main Street () applies primarily to local or collector street corridors, or may be embedded within a commercial shopping center or mixed-use area, where a building scale of 1 to stories is desired. Multi-Unit (M) M is a multi unit district allowing urban house, duplex, tandem house, row house, garden court, courtyard apartment and apartment building forms. The tallest building form has a maximum height of three stories. Mixed Use () applies to areas or intersections served primarily by local or collector streets where a building scale of 1 to stories is desired. Mixed Use () applies to areas or intersections served primarily by local or collector streets where a building scale of 1 to stories is desired.

Overlay C Historic Small Lot Corner Store Side Interior Setbacks Area: Main Street, Mixed Use, and Multi-Unit Zone Districts within the boundaries of the Highland neighborhood. Existing Characteristics: Commercial buildings ( Corner Stores ) are located at corner locations next to residential buildings. The typical historic side interior setback for a Corner Store building next to a residential structure is zero feet. The historic street character is a continuous building wall along the sidewalk with a narrow space between the commercial building and adjacent residential property. Residential buildings have front doors facing streets. Problem: Under the current zoning; residential parcels are protected districts. New structures must have a minimum side interior setback of 10 ft. when adjacent to a residential lot. This requirement creates large gaps that are suburban in character, undermine the traditional development pattern, and do not support the contextual character of the Highland Neighborhood. New residential buildings utilizing the General Form are automobile-oriented and do not have front doors facing the street. Proposed Overlay C For the following building forms: 1. General. Storefront Proposed Zoning Code Modifications: (see Exhibit CI) On frontages 0 feet in width or less, the minimum side interior setback adjacent to a Protected District shall be feet for the portion of the structure below 7 feet in height. Setbacks and bulk plane for portions above 7 feet shall follow the zoning code. All new projects shall have at least one street-facing front door per structure with street frontage. Navajo Street near 4 Ave. Corner stores are typically built zero lot line to their side yard. The new zoning requires a 10 side setback, disrupting the historic character of a continuous building wall along the sidewalk. Draft November 014 9

plan perspective aerial Existing Condition zero lot line at side yard zero lot line varies Current Zoning 10 18 7 10 1 10 1 18 7 10 Proposed Overlay <0 >0 18 7 0 0 18 7 I. Side Yard Setback Draft November 014 10

N FEDERAL BLVD N DECATUR ST N CLAY ST N ALCOTT ST N LYLE CT N TEJON ST N PECOS ST N SHOSHONE ST N QUIVAS ST N NAVAJO ST N MARIPOSA ST N KALAMATH ST N JASON ST N INCA ST W CLYDE PL W 7TH AVE W 6TH AVE W DENVER PL W 6TH AVE W 8TH AVE R- M 0 W 9TH AVE W 7TH AVE A B INTERSTATE HOV N FO X ST W TH AVE W 4TH AVE W ND AVE M W DOUGLAS PL KEY R- M M Proposed Design Overlay District D Highland Areas Outside of District D Highland Areas Zoned or Old Zoning with Waivers W 4TH AVE W RD AVE W ARGYLE PL N SPEER BLVD N BRYANT ST X RH-. W CAITHNESS PL M RH-. W DUNKELD PL N FIRTH CT M N ZUNI ST W 8TH AVE W 1ST AVE W 0TH AVE RH- M M W 7TH AVE RH-. R-M0 17TH ST ERIE ST 16TH ST. 18TH ST KENSING CT R- CENTRAL ST BOULDER ST 19TH ST Overlay Map D Includes the following zoning areas: Mixed Use - () applies to areas or intersections served primarily by collector or arterial streets where a building scale of 1 to stories is desired.

Overlay D -Story Height Exception Area: Zone District within the boundaries of the Highland neighborhood. Existing Characteristics: Most of Denver is located on relatively flat ground, but much of the land zoned in Highland is on land that slopes up from the river valley below. Heights of buildings in mixed-use zones are not uniform. Rooftop equipment is often visible and does not exceed the height of buildings by substantial distances. Problems: The new zoning code now allows height exceptions that permit mechanical equipment and other rooftop structures to extend 8 feet above the roof where they would be visible from other buildings nearby. Proposed Overlay D For all building forms: Proposed Zoning Code Modifications: (see Exhibit DI) Zone District in the Highland Neighborhood: Elevator penthouses (except those serving an elevator that provides access to an occupied roof), unoccupied shade structures, stair enclosures, and enclosed or unenclosed mechanical equipment including vertical or sloped screen walls for such equipment shall be limited to 1 feet in height. Draft November 014 11

Proposed Overlay Current Zoning 8 PERMITTED ENCROACHMENT 1 PERMITTED ENCROACHMENT I. Height Exceptions Draft November 014 1

N FEDERAL BLVD N DECATUR ST N CLAY ST N ALCOTT ST N LYLE CT N TEJON ST N PECOS ST N SHOSHONE ST N QUIVAS ST N NAVAJO ST N MARIPOSA ST N KALAMATH ST N JASON ST N INCA ST W CLYDE PL W 7TH AVE W 6TH AVE W DENVER PL W 6TH AVE W 8TH AVE R- M 0 W 9TH AVE W 7TH AVE A B INTERSTATE HOV N FO X ST W TH AVE W 4TH AVE W ND AVE M W DOUGLAS PL KEY R- M M Proposed Design Overlay District E Highland Areas Outside of District E Highland Areas Zoned or Old Zoning with Waivers W 4TH AVE W RD AVE W ARGYLE PL N SPEER BLVD N BRYANT ST X RH-. W CAITHNESS PL M RH-. W DUNKELD PL N FIRTH CT M N ZUNI ST W 8TH AVE W 1ST AVE W 0TH AVE RH- M M W 7TH AVE E RH-. R-M0 17TH ST ERIE ST 16TH ST. 18TH ST KENSING CT R- CENTRAL ST BOULDER ST 19TH ST Overlay Map E Includes the following zoning areas: Two Unit B () allows up to two units on a minimum zone lot area of 4,00 square feet. Allowed building forms are the urban house, detached accessory dwelling unit, duplex and tandem house building forms. Two Unit B () allows up to two units on a minimum zone lot area of 4,00 square feet with additional units allowed on corner lots subject to location restrictions. Allowed building forms are the urban house, detached accessory dwelling unit, duplex and tandem house building forms. Rowhouses are also allowed on certain corner lots.

Overlay E Historic Development Forms in Potter Highlands Area: and Zone Districts within the Potter Highlands subdivision (north of West nd Avenue, south of West 8th Avenue, east of Federal Boulevard, and west of Zuni Street). Existing Characteristics: Many two-story houses and duplexes constructed in the late 19th Century and early 0th Century in the Potter Highlands Landmark District have gable or hip roofs with nd floor plate heights of or 6 feet above the second floor level with dormers expanding useable interior living space. Other two-story houses and duplexes have parapets and flat roofs. Nearly 7% of duplexes and other twohome properties are on lots 0 ft. or wider and larger than,00 square feet. Garages and carriage houses are often built to a zero side yard setback in the rear third of lots. Carriage houses generally mimic the form of the primary house on a lot. Problems: zoning allows taller sidewalls than are customary in Potter Highlands and allow third level wedding cake elements under the bulk planes that are not characteristic of the historic district. The current zoning does not allow dormers along the sides of new houses and duplexes that are characteristic of the historic district. Current zoning requires a combined side interior setback for residential structures of 10 feet on lots between 1 ft. and 40 ft. When redevelopment occurs, these large side setbacks can destroy the historic pattern of buildings along the streets by creating large, uncharacteristic gaps between buildings. New duplexes are being built on smaller lots, usually replacing a single family home. This creates a denser development pattern, with less open space. While garages in the rear 1/ of a lot are allowed to abut side property lines without a setback, Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) structures are not allowed this same setback for the garage portion of the building on the ground floor, discouraging development of affordable housing units. ADUs are being proposed that do not follow the half-story diagram shown in Denver Zoning Code Figure 1.1-. Proposed Overlay E For the following building forms: 1. Urban House. Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit. Duplex 4. Tandem House Proposed Zoning Code Modifications: (see Exhibit EIII) On lots 1 feet to 40 feet in width, the minimum side interior setback shall be feet. For Urban House, Duplex, and Tandem House forms: o On lots 0 feet wide or less, Bulk Plane Vertical Height at Side Interior and Side Street zone lot line in front 6% of lot to be 1 feet. o On lots 1 feet wide or greater, Bulk Plane Vertical Height at Side Interior and Side Street zone lot line in front 6% of lot to be 1 feet. o No roof decks are allowed at the third level. o Alternate Bulk Plane: In the front 6% of a lot, a flat roof, two-story structure not exceeding feet in height is not subject to a bulk plane. In the rear % of a lot, a flat roof, one-story structure not exceeding 14 feet is not subject to a bulk plane. o Where bulk planes apply, gable, shed, or hip form dormers may penetrate the bulk planes subject to the following: - Total length of dormers cannot exceed 0% of length of sidewall. - Individual dormers cannot exceed 1 feet in length AND must be separated from other dormers by at least 4 feet. - Dormers must be set back at least feet from front wall of building. - Minimum slope for shed dormer roofs is 4/1. - Maximum height of dormer may not exceed the ridge height of the main roof. For Duplex and Tandem House forms: o Minimum Lot Area shall be 00 square feet. o Minimum Lot Width shall be 0 feet. For Detached Accessory Dwelling Unit form: o Minimum side interior setbacks for the garage portion of an Accessory Dwelling Unit may use a zero foot setback that is identical to the minimum side interior setbacks for the Detached Garage building form. o The half-story upper level of ADUs shall follow the language of 1.1...B. and the gable or hip roof form shown in Figure 1.1-. Draft November 014 1

Proposed Overlay Draft November 014 14

Proposed Overlay Draft November 014 1

Proposed Overlay Draft November 014 16

History of these Design Overlays: Highland was platted with ' and 0'-wide lots. A great diversity of building forms, with narrow side yard setbacks, populate these blocks. Highland was originally platted in the 1860s. Many buildings were built during the late 1800s and early 1900s. When Highland was zoned in 196, it was given zoning of the automobile-oriented era that did not match what was already built. This created a mismatch that survives to this day: Our zoning does not match out historic building patterns. In 001, during the Blueprint Denver process, the Highland Neighborhood became aware of the upcoming zoning code update. HUNI s Planning and Community Development (PCD) Committee began working on documentation of historic conditions, and creation of zoning language that would better match its 19th century urban fabric so that it could be incorporated into the zoning code update. In the winter of 006, University of Colorado graduate students were engaged to research and document these historic forms. In April of 006, the Highland Planning and Community Development Committee brought that research to closure with its own visual documentation of historic forms and provided it to the city for use in the zoning code update. There were follow up meetings with city planning staff including one site visit. In June 009, the first draft of the Zoning Code Update appeared to be much better matched with the late 19th century urban fabric of Highland. From June to October 009, Highland citizens, led by its PCD Committee, worked diligently to test the code and comment in writing to the city planning department on the details of the code. On November 1st, 009, the Zoning Code Task Force approved a new draft of the code which reverted much of Highland back to the language of Quick Wins II, eliminating the code improvements that Highland had worked so hard to incorporate into the zoning code update. Once again, the language proposed for Highland did not match the historic patterns of development. From November 009 through June of 010 the Highland Planning and Community Development Committee persisted, without success, to improve this code. We were told that after the approval of the new zoning code we could take up our problems as part of an historic overlay. In the fall of 010 we continued meeting with city staff on how to accomplish this. In the spring of 011 we were told that a Design Overlay would be the best way to accomplish our code improvements. HUNI PCD worked on this zoning language from the spring of 011 through November 011. In January 01, a University of Colorado student intern was engaged to prepare an exhibit of the proposed zoning overlays during the spring semester of 01. During 01 and 01, HUNI PCD tested the language for clarity, consistency, and brevity. In September of 01, HUNI PCD invited 7 Architects who design renovations and infill projects in Highland to review the language and test it in real life situations. The purpose was to confirm that our initial goals would be realized by the language, and to eliminate unintended consequences that would be harmful to our goals. Since 01, there has been a lot of new development pressure on Highland. This has raised citizen awareness of the problems with our zoning. The problem has been acute throughout Highland and particularly within the Potter Highlands Landmark District. In 014, the Denver Landmark Preservation Commission published new guidelines for development in Potter Highlands. The guidelines helped to highlight the mismatch between current zoning and historic building types. The gulf between the zoning regulations and the Landmark Guidelines continues to make development of additions and new buildings confusing and time consuming for both residents and builders. In September, 014, HUNI hired Richard Farley, former urban design director of Denver, to help with refining the language of the proposed Design Overlays, and with writing new overlay language for Potter Highlands. This new zoning language for Potter Highlands is intended to bring zoning into closer alignment with the Landmark Guidelines, simplifying the process to make new construction more compatible with the existing neighborhood. Draft November 014 appendix