MONTHLY MEETING HI- COUNTRY ESTATES II HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION MARCH 28, 2009

Similar documents
4. If any perennial surface water passes through or along the property lines of the acreage, a minimum of 200 feet or frontage should be required.

Public Sewer Extension Information Packet

SUBURBAN AND URBAN RESIDENTIAL LAND USE

Resource Protection Area Map Update - Frequently Asked Questions

AGENDA ITEM 3. R Meeting May 14, 2014 AGENDA ITEM

5-703 Agricultural Rural (AR) District Cluster Option. (A)

FINAL DRAFT 12/1/16, Rev. to 7/18/17

CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT

4. facilitate the construction of streets, utilities and public services in a more economical and efficient manner;

19.12 CLUSTER RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

LIVING IN THE COUNTRY ELKO COUNTY, NEVADA. A few things to consider when moving into rural areas of Elko County.

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

New Private Way Ordinance Westbrook Planning Board Workshop , Planning Board Public Hearing Definitions

2030 General Plan. December 6, 7 pm

PROPOSED STATE STREET ROAD SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT

WHITEHAWK RANCH MUTUAL WATER COMPANY

City of Woodinville Washington State Boundary Review Board Notice of Intent Brown Annexation

APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION APPROVAL OF A SKETCH PLAN with checklist

PROVO CITY MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION GUIDE

Agricultural Preserve Cancellation

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1800 Continental Place Mount Vernon, WA Inspections Office Fax 360.

Recorded Map Modification

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 17, 2017

TOWNSHIP OF EGG HARBOR ZONING BOARD ADJUSTMENT CHECK LIST

Development Opportunity: Priority Development Site

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Title 32 Special Districts

DOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 4 LRR - Large Rural Residential District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-

1. Brief History & Timeline of the Chelmsford Sewer Project

Q: When will the first SID payment become due?

820 BEL MARIN KEYS BOULEVARD, NOVATO ASSESSOR'S PARCEL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MAJOR SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECKLIST

Lake of the Woods County Land Use Permit Instruction Sheet

CARRIAGE HILLS METROPOLITAN DISTRICT SUMMARY DESCRIPTION AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS AS OF NOVEMBER 2015

PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECK LIST

BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT

Harris Ranch Community Infrastructure District No. 1. Feasibility Report Special Assessment Bonds (Assessment Area One)

Innovative Local Government Land Conservation Techniques

FUTURE LAND USE. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments

Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)

SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES SECTION DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRING SITE PLAN APPROVAL

A. ARTICLE 16 - STEEP SLOPE CONSERVATION DISTRICT

Request to Advertise: Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) Map Update. June 20, 2017

Tanglewood Condominium Corporation ( )

ARTICLE II SEWAGE TREATMENT. Sec Purpose and intent. Sec Applicability. Sec Authority. Sec Administration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Minor Conditional Use Permit

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

CITY OF GROVER BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tentative Map Checklist

Canyons South. Annexation Impact Report. September 1, 2015

CHAPTER 13 WINCHESTER WETLANDS BYLAW

APPLICATION REVIEW CHECKLISTS

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS: The number indicates the number of copies for submittal (if applicable).

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Choosing A Home 4. Buying A Home 7. The Manufacturer s Warranty 7. Implied Warranties 8. The Retailer s Warranty 8

Rules & Regulations. Control and Operation of the Water Distribution System

ARTICLE XI - CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS

SINGLE-FAMILY WETLAND CERTIFICATION PROCESS

Chesapeake Bay Preservation Area (CBPA) Map Update. Presentation to the County Board July 15, 2017

STAFF REPORT. Arthur and Kathleen Quiggle 4(b)

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Mrs. Robine asked about the solar plan which was proposed at one point in time.

DOUGLAS COUNTY SUBDIVISION RESOLUTION Article 4 Preliminary Plan 10/13/2015

TRANSMITTAL FROM The Mayor

PLANNING RATIONALE ONTARIO LTD. APLLICATION FOR PLAN OF SUBDIVISION APPROVAL

Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the Development Review Board Held on the fifth day of December, 2018

FEE The staff will let you know the current cost of filing an application. Make checks payable to the San Joaquin County Treasurer.

(b) The location of principal and accessory buildings on the lot and the relationship of each structure to the other.

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT BENDER URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION AND ANNEXATION REQUEST April 3, Background

MEMORANDUM. Michael D. Minton, Esq., Brad R. Gould, Esq. and Richard I. Withers, Esq.

Buying Land. Happy Landings

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. May 12, 2010 (Agenda)

ANDOVER CODE. Checklist #5 Preliminary Site Plan Conditional Use

Public Facilities and Finance Element

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON SEWER SYSTEM FINANCIAL OVERVIEW MARCH, 2018

KENT COUNTY STORMWATER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

2017 TOWN OF RISING SUN FEE SCHEDULE ADOPTED

CITRUS HEIGHTS COMMUNITY SPECIAL PLANNING AREA

Legacy Ridge at Highland Mills: Town of Woodbury June 15, 2006 Draft Environmental Impact Statement

BRIDGETON SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CHECKLIST

The Ranches Sketch Plan

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICATION GUIDE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

APPLICATION PROCESSING STEPS STEP 1 CHECK WITH STAFF

Special Use Permit - Planned Unit Development Checklist. Property Address:

Variance THIS PACKAGE CONTAINS AND, IF 'D, ALSO CONTAINS SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT

SPECIAL SERVICE AREA DISCLOSURE

SKETCH PLAN REVIEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION, SPECIAL REVIEW,

ARTICLE 7 UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS

Washington Township Wastewater Management Plan. January 27, 2012

Conservation Design Subdivisions

Zoning Permit Application

REPORT TO THE SHELBY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION From the Department of Development Services Planning Services. February 4, 2019

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Moraga Stormwater Fee Measure Ballot Procedure

Gilman Plan Committee Minutes February 17, 2010

A. Preserve natural resources as identified in the Comprehensive Plan.

GWINNETT COUNTY CSO CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS

Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Remediation Project

DRAFT Findings of Fact Major Development Review Final Subdivision Plan September 10, 2015

MAPLETON CITY CORPORATION. Step 7: Upon final approval and prior to plat recording the applicant shall provide the following:

Rural Municipality of Kellross No Official Community Plan. Bylaw No

Transcription:

MONTHLY MEETING HI- COUNTRY ESTATES II HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION MARCH 28, 2009 Infrastructure deterioration can be reversed and expansions of systems to serve new development are possible but all solutions will require funding.

Situation: New development and infrastructure maintenance are interrelated and there are shared responsibilities for managing these systems. Hi-Country Estates II HOA Board Maintain roads owned by HCEII Maintain and operate water system owned by HCEII Enforce and interpret HOA protective covenants Manage the construction of capital improvement projects. Salt Lake County Government Maintain Rose Canyon Road Provide Law Enforcement and Animal Control Enforce Zoning Regulations Administer Foothills and Canyon Overlay Zone (FCOZ) Provide Building Inspection and Permits Provide Health Inspections (Septic Tank Permits) Interpret State Greenbelt rules - Tax Assessor Individual Property Owners Development of main roads Development and maintain private property Qualify for Greenbelt as a property tax break Decide for or against annexation into Herriman Research constraints to development of property

There is no sewer service within HCE II and there are limitations to septic tank locations and design. The SL Valley Health Department will not permit septic tanks Within a source protection area (Parts of Area D) Where a percolation test fails (Several locations within HCEII) Within 100 feet of a stream (Rose Creek) Challenges in Installing a Sewer System Property owners will need to annex to the sewer district. (This would increase the average residential property tax in HCE II by about $100 per year.) The sewer district would install the pipe then allocate cost to users. (In June 2006, the Sewer District estimated this would cost $20,000 to $45,000) If a house is within 500 feet of a sewer line, the owners will have to abandon their septic tank and connect to the sewer as required by State law.

Meeting with Herriman, Water Quality Board and South Valley Sewer District March 25th Stimulus grants available Annexation into Sewer District Apply for grant from Water Quality Board They will fund 2/3 of the project South Valley will bond for remaining amount Cost and repayment Everyone will pay $3900.00 connection fee Property owners will pay $17,000.00 impact fee Everyone will pay for trenching to hook up to sewer Some will pay for grinder/injector system South Valley will charge $20.00 per month for services Water Quality will assess $50.00 per month to individuals connected until the amount bonded for is re-paid. Now is the time to act while construction cost is low and grant money is available!!!!

The roads owned by HCE II are unsafe and not adequate for a standard subdivision. Maintained Unmaintained Area A 2.74 miles 0.15 miles Area B 1.72 miles 0.38 miles Area C 2.19 miles Area D 3.88 miles 3.37 miles Challenges: 10.53 miles 3.90 miles The existing gravel roads were never properly engineered for storm water runoff. This creates ruts and washouts several times per year. The roads are steeper and narrower than standard residential roads. This limits fire truck access, large service vehicle access and speed. Routine maintenance is not frequent enough to stop the continual deterioration of high travel areas such as the S curve and Sharose Road. On steep hills, washboarding develops within a short time after grading. Association members do not want to pay additional money for road improvements

The water system owned by HCEII is not adequate to serve both existing residents and new development. 17 miles of distribution pipe 171 connections with the future demand to expand to 500 connections In 2008 HCEII purchased 22,453,000 gallons of water from Herriman City and pumped 15,659,500 gallons from upper well for a total of 38,112,500 gallons of water consumed in 2008. Challenges: Six inch diameter distribution pipe is not standard size Aging pipe and connectors are prone to failures In 2005 Herriman City estimated that it would cost $2,000,000 to upgrade the distribution system Inadequate storage for future growth During the summer months tanks are drained by landscape watering There is no back up water source for Area D

Water Right Size of Water Right: 1,048 Acre-feet Requirement to proof right and demonstrate its entire capacity is put to beneficial use Capacity of Pump = 124 acre-feet Retention of right for future growth even though it is not in use to its capacity Management of water right sale to Herriman Improvement / expansion of water sources for future use

Unpaid assessments are almost equal to the annual roads and administrative budget of the HCEII HOA HCE II Roads and Administrative Budget (2008-09) Road Maintenance $30,573 Snow Removal $30,000 Legal Fees $35,000 Administrative $18,937 Common Area Maintenance $ 1,300 Subtotal: $115,810 Unpaid Assessments $26,325 Total: $142,135 Annual Assessments( 08-09) Total Delinquent Assessments (Feb. 2009) Area A $ 30,070 $ 6,362 Area B $ 18,290 $ 12,122 Area C $ 48,205 $ 13,766 Area D $ 45,570 $ 82,714 Total: $142,135 $114,912

The Foothill and Canyon Overlay Zone (FCOZ) Restricts Development SLCO FCOZ Code Chapter 19.72 Purpose of FCOZ-Provide for the preservation of environmentally sensitive areas and open space by encouraging clustering or other design techniques to preserve the natural terrain, minimize disturbance to existing trees and vegetation, preserve wildlife habitat, and protect aquifer recharge areas. Land on hillsides and side canyons is included in FCOZ; the area is mapped by SLCo Development Services Division Building permits in this area will not be granted on hilltops, slopes, steep accesses or washes FCOZ review process may add six months to one year to the time for getting a building permit Salt Lake County has the power to determine what and where you can landscape your property, the color of your house and if you can have an out building Advantage - The final product is a well placed, attractive development that adds value to the area

Developers of land adjacent to HCEII want to use our Water and Roads At the 2006 annual meeting the membership voted to NOT open our roads to neighboring developments. There are no plans to sell water outside of our development.

Hi-Country II folks have diverse interests and have offered various solutions to development issues.

The Greenbelt tax break saves money for some property owners but it has created conflict with residents. Residents, not on Greenbelt Pay full property tax on their land Real estate investment in Rose Canyon is also their home The livestock that that qualifies property for Greenbelt grazes on residential landscaping Loose livestock is dangerous in traffic Overgrazing causes erosion and invasive plants Non Residents on Greenbelt Property must be greater than five acres and be used for a qualified agricultural use This is a low cost method to hold property until it is developable and the real estate market returns Landowners who do not live in the area may view their property as an investment. 75% of the unpaid HOA assessments belong to properties on greenbelt.

Taxed value of property in HCEII in 2008 illustrates the value of property in Greenbelt Value of Taxed Real Estate Residential Land HCE II Assessed Value $53,675,048 51% $13,238,059 12% Subtotal: Value of Non-Taxed Real Estate Real Estate on Greenbelt $66,913,107 $38,841,652 37% Subtotal: $38,841,652 Total $105,754,759

The 64% of the land in HCE II is on greenbelt and 37% of the taxable value is property tax-free because of Greenbelt. Year - 2008 Acres In Greenbelt Area A Area B Area C Area D Total 337 228 185 569 1319 Total Acres 485 288 581 718 2072 % of Area in Greenbelt 69% 79% 32% 79% 64% Greenbelt Value (Not taxed) $12,948,960 $7,893,682 $8,829,530 $9,169,480 $38,841,652 27,616,566 13,378,488 47,126,889 17,631,816 105,754,759 Total Taxable Value % Taxed Value in Greenbelt 47% 59% 19% 52% 37%

In 2008 HCEII property owners contributed $43,895 in property tax to Salt Lake County for basic government services. If we were in Herriman, we would have paid $21,478 to Herriman. Basic Government Services are funded by property and sales tax (Municipal Services) Maintain Rose Canyon Road Law Enforcement (Herriman residents pay for this in their water bill) Animal Control Zoning Enforcement Building Inspection and Permits Neighborhood Parks (Herriman Residents pay for this in their water bill) Total HCE II Taxed value = $66,913,106 SLCo Municipal Services mill levy = 0.000656 $66,913,106 X.000656= $43,895 If were in Herriman: Herriman City mill levy = 0.000321 $66,913,106 X.000321 = $21,479

Annexing to Herriman could solve some of the problems but could Herriman City afford to service our area? Stay the Same whether we annex or not Homeowners Association 2.5 Acre minimum lots Water System Lack of Sewer Gravel Roads Law Enforcement Animal Control Fire Protection Health Regulations Tax Assessor Garbage Collection Change if we annex Building Permits Zoning Enforcement FCOZ restrictions may be lifted Local Representation More funding potential for projects Lower Property Tax (In 2008) It is unknown if Herriman will need to increase property tax in future years to off-set the reduction of fees from the slow down in development. Rose Canyon Road Maintenance

If we were part of Herriman in 2008, the owner of a house with a tax value of $330,346 would have paid $143 less in property tax but at least $360 more in fees. Hi-Country Estates II Property Tax (2008) Jordan School District $1,619 Jordan School Basic 413 SLCo General Fund 403 SLCo Cap Imp 4 SLCo Bond Int/Sink 80 SLCo Flood Control 20 SLCo Health 45 SLCo Planetarium 13 SLCo Library 163 Mosquito Abatement 7 Central Ut Water Cons 94 MultiCnty Assess/Col Levy 40 Cnty Assess/ Coll Levy 28 SL Valley Fire 517 Jordan Valley Water Cons 127 County Municipal Services 217 Total Tax : $3,790 Herriman Property Tax (2008) Jordan School District $1,619 Jordan School Basic 413 SLCo General Fund 403 SLCo Cap Imp 4 SLCo Bond Int/Sink 80 SLCo Flood Control 20 SLCo Health 45 SLCo Planetarium 13 SLCo Library 163 Mosquito Abatement 7 Central Ut Water Cons 94 MultiCnty Assess/Col Levy 40 Cnty Assess/ Coll Levy 28 SL Valley Fire 517 Jordan Valley Water Cons 94 Herriman City 106 Total Tax : $3,647 Fees added to water bill $ 360 Other fees added to Utility bills varies

Some Methods of Funding Development and Infrastructure Improvements Special Assessments: Vote by geographic area to increase the annual assessment paid to the HOA. Developer: The Developer funds his entire impact. ( Roads, water, sewer, etc.) Special Taxing District: This would increase property tax and use the revenue for infrastructure improvements. (For every $20,000 in revenue, property tax on the average house in HCEII would increase by $100) Federal and State funds

Call to Action Educate yourself on the issues in HCEII Participate in a lobby group to gain support for the sewer district If there is a strong reason to annex to Herriman, participate in an annexation group to gain support and circulate petitions Come to monthly meetings and participate in solutions

Volunteers are Needed!

Annual Meeting June 13, 2009 1. 1:00 PM