Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Similar documents
Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

COMMERCIAL EXCHANGE BUILDING West 8th Street and 800 South Olive Street CHC HCM ENV CE

CALIFORNIA. cfr. i l fi ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CATALINA SWIMWEAR BUILDING 443 South San Pedro Street CHC HCM ENV CE

CALIFORNIA S' '( * ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

CALIFORNIA. 'w<. LISA M. WEBBER, AICP GAIL KENNARD DEPUTY DIRECTOR VICE PRESIDENT (213) PILAR BUELNA DIANE KANNER BARRY A MILOFSKY

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

HOLLYWOOD CITIZEN-NEWS BUILDING North Wilcox Avenue CHC HCM ENV CE

CALIFORNIA. Si*-: A m (213) PILAR BUELNA DIANE KANNER BARRY A MILOFSKY. WOED>: ff ERIC GARCETTI

State of California The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION PRIMARY RECORD

EXECUTIVE OFFICES CITY PLANNING 200 N. Spring Street, Room 532 CALIFORNIA. Los ANGELES, CA (213)

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

REASONS FOR LISTING: 306 AND 308 LONSDALE ROAD. #306 Lonsdale #308 Lonsdale. 306 and 308 Lonsdale Road Apartments

MIAMI WOMAN S CLUB 1737 N. BAYSHORE DRIVE. Designation Report. City of Miami

TAX PHOTOS and CONTEXT

TALBOT-WOOD DOUBLE DWELLING North Las Palmas Avenue CHC HCM ENV CE

Memorandum. Overview. Background Information. To: Scott Albright, City of Santa Monica Date: 04/22/2013 Jan Ostashay, Principal OAC

EAMES HOUSE: A PRECEDENT STUDY Lea Santano & Lauren Martin

BENEFICIAL PLAZA AND LIBERTY PARK

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Rock Island County Courthouse History & Significance

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Kingston hereby enacts as follows:

BERGER WINSTON APARTMENT BUILDING /2 S. Ridgeley Drive CHC HCM ENV CE

This location map is for information purposes only. The exact boundaries of the property are not shown.

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

Criteria Evaluation: Landmark staff found that the structure application meets History Criteria 1a, and Architecture Criterion 2a and 2b.

Project Team. Developer Landmark Properties, Inc. Andrew Young 455 Epps Bridge Pkwy #021 Athens, GA 30606

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

NEW HAMPSHIRE HISTORIC PROPERTY DOCUMENTATION DINARDO-DUPUIS HOUSE NH STATE NO Wight Street, Berlin, Coos County, New Hampshire

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR. Sharon Gin, Legislative Assistant Planning and Land Use Management Committee

Location map, showing the Main Block (#1) and the links to the West (#2) and East (#3) Wings that are included in the Reasons for Designation.

Architectural Inventory Form

4401 WILSHIRE BLVD LOS ANGELES, CA

Architectural Inventory Form

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE27.20, adopted as amended, by City of Toronto Council on November 7, 8 and 9, 2017 CITY OF TORONTO

HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY FORM University of Oregon Cultural Resources Survey Eugene, Lane County, Oregon Summer 2006

SECURITY BUILDING 117 NE 1 ST AVENUE

Trinomial NRHP Status Code 3S Other Listings Review Code Reviewer Date

BRLYRLY. Cultural Heritage Commission Report. City. of Beverly. Hills Planning Division. Meeting Date: January 10, Subject:

RIDDLE RIDDLE ASSOCIATES, INC.

0 buildings sites structures 0 objects. 0 Total. Name of related multiple property listing: Historic and Architectural Resources of Nacogdoches, Texas

Architectural Inventory Form

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

DHR Resource Number: AVON STREET

Durant Ave., Berkeley

HISTORIC LANDMARK DESIGNATION

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

GREATER BETHEL A.M.E. CHURCH 245 N.W. 8 TH STREET

Hastings CBD Heritage Inventory Project HEARDS JEWELLERY CENTRE

HISTORIC RESOURCE SURVEY FORM University of Oregon Cultural Resources Survey Eugene, Lane County, Oregon Summer 2006

Fig. 16 & 17 Left: Carved limestone detail. Right: Carved limestone and metal screen at main entrance on west elevation.

HALISSEE HALL 1475 N.W. 12 AVENUE

Descriptive sheet. Municipal Address 394 Besserer Street Building name 394 Besserer Street Legal description Lot: Block: Plan:

5^3 CAM MAY United States Department of the Interior National Park Service

Transcription:

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION HEARING DATE: April 4, 2013 TIME: 10:00 AM PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 CASE NO.: CHC-2013-899-HCM ENV-2013-900-CE Location: 819 S. Santee Street Council District: 14 Community Plan Area: Central City Area Planning Commission: Central Neighborhood Council: Downtown Los Angeles Legal Description: Lot 1 and 2 of Tract Resubdivision of the Widow Botiller Tract PROJECT: REQUEST: OWNER: OWNER S REPRESENTATIVE: RECOMMENDATION Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the MAXFIELD BUILDING Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument Capital Foresight, LP 2980 N. Beverly Glen Circle, Ste. 300 Los Angeles, CA 90077 Shannon Ferguson Chattel Inc. 13417 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Take the property under consideration as a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.10 because the application and accompanying photo documentation suggest the submittal warrants further investigation. 2. Adopt the report findings. MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Ken Bernstein, AICP, Manager Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: Historic-Cultural Monument Application

Maxfield Building CHC-2013-899-HCM Page 2 of 2 SUMMARY Built in 1925 and located in the Downtown area, this twelve-story commercial building exhibits character-defining features of Art Deco style architecture. The subject building is roughly rectangular in plan and features a flat roof covered in rolled asphalt. An elevator penthouse is located on the southern end of the roof and on the eastern end is a large sign reading 819 SANTEE. The exterior is composed of painted reinforced concrete. The primary façade is divided into four bays by fluted, full-height piers with the building featuring several variations of fenestration types. The center bays contain multi-paned steel sash awning windows and the outer bays are tripartite steel sash awning windows. Contemporary slider windows are found in the mezzanine. Arched windows are located at the second story in outer bays and all bays of the twelfth story. Simple flat spandrel panels are set above and below each window with horizontal coping at the third and eleventh stories. Outer bays terminate slightly above the roof top in a simple stepped pattern. The main entrance located at the southernmost bay is marked by a stuccoed canopy with rounded corners. The inset opening is filled with contemporary glass and metal doors. Significant interior spaces include the lobby s dropped ceiling, tiles, and a wood and glass security booth. Other character defining features include exposed concrete floors in the retail space and an exposed steel beam ceiling, linoleum floors, marble tiles, and original wood paneled doors with transoms. The proposed Maxfield Building historic monument was designed by architect John M. Cooper for wholesale textile merchant Allen A. Maxfield. The construction of this building appears to have played a role in the development of Downtown as the center of garment manufacturing on the west coast of the United States in the early 20 th century. Alterations have been made to the upper floors on a tenant-by-tenant basis. The mezzanine was expanded in 1927 and the elevator cabs were altered at an unknown date. CRITERIA The criterion is the Cultural Heritage Ordinance which defines a historical or cultural monument as any site (including significant trees or other plant life located thereon) building or structure of particular historic or cultural significance to the City of Los Angeles, such as historic structures or sites in which the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community is reflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historic personages or with important events in the main currents of national, State or local history or which embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual genius influenced his age. FINDINGS Based on the facts set forth in the summary and application, the Commission determines that the application is complete and that the property may be significant enough to warrant further investigation as a potential Historic-Cultural Monument.