APPENDIX C REAL ESTATE PLAN BOULEVARD RESACA, BROWNSVILLE, TX CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS

Similar documents
Appendix B Real Estate Plan

Appendix C. Real Estate. Brazos Island Harbor, Texas Channel Improvement Project Cameron County, Texas

Appendix B Draft Real Estate Plan

REAL ESTATE PLAN APPENDIX G

Appendix G. Non-Federal Letters of Support and Draft Real Estate Plan

APPENDIX D - REAL ESTATE

Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact

JANUARY 2016 MAMARONECK & SHELDRAKE RIVERS NEW YORK FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK APPENDIX E

Appendix H: Real Estate Plan

APPENDIX M. Real Estate Plan

Draft Continuing Authorities Program Section 1135 Detailed Project Report and Integrated Environmental Assessment

WEST SHORE LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE RISK REDUCTION STUDY INTEGRATED DRAFT FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

APPENDIX H REAL ESTATE PLAN

APPENDIX H REAL ESTATE REQUIREMENTS

DRAFT INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX G REAL ESTATE

Dredged Material Management Plan Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Port Royal Sound, South Carolina to Cumberland Sound, Georgia November 2015

DRAFT REAL ESTATE PLAN APPENDIX D JEFFERSON COUNTY ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY

Appendix K. Real Estate Plan

Skagit River Flood Risk Management General Investigation Skagit County, Washington. Draft Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION FEASIBILITY REPORT WITH INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

INDIANA HARBOR AND CANAL CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY EAST CHICAGO, INDIANA

Delaware River Basin Comprehensive Flood Risk Management Interim Feasibility Study and Integrated Environmental Assessment for New Jersey

REAL ESTATE PLAN. Final Integrated General Reevaluation Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDIX F REAL ESTATE PLAN

APPENDIX D REAL ESTATE PLAN

AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE LANDS BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST. PAUL DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND. THE CITY OF City, State

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

Mississippi River Ship Channel Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Integrated General Reevaluation Report And Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

HUNTING BAYOU FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS DRAFT GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT AND INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION FEASIBILITY REPORT WITH INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

EDISTO BEACH COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION GENERAL INVESTIGATION STUDY APPENDIX K REAL ESTATE

APPENDIX F REAL ESTATE

Appendix J. Real Estate Plan

MAMARONECK AND SHELDRAKE RIVER FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT MAMARONECK, NEW YORK APPENDIX E REAL ESTATE PLAN

Bill of Rights. Cities of 5,000 or more population; adoption or amendment of charter

Real Estate Plan Beaver Lake Water Supply Reallocation White River Rogers, Arkansas. 20 April 2017

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C

Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR) APPENDIX H Real Estate Cost

Texas Land Trust Conference March 6, 2015

APPENDIX D REAL ESTATE DRAFT. MOBILE HARBOR, MOBILE, ALABAMA Integrated General Reevaluation Report With Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

APPENDIX E REAL ESTATE PLAN

LCRA BOARD POLICY 401 LAND RESOURCES. Sept. 21, 2016

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District APPENDIX E CHARLESTON HARBOR POST 45 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA. Real Estate

Submittal of the Minutes from the March 9, 2011, April 5, 2011, and April 19, 2011 Cabinet Meetings.

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC Regulation No May 2015

Site Selection and Acquisition

APPENDIX H. Real Estate Plan

Draft Appendix E. Real Estate Plan. Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study. November 2016

CHAPTER 6 CHESAPEAKE BAY PRESERVATION AREAS AND STREAM PROTECTION AREAS

Southwest Coastal Louisiana Study

Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

Water Rights: Beds, Boats & Beaches

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Selection Criteria Form

Land Management Plan Fargo-Moorhead (FM) Area Flood Risk Reduction Project Version 1

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

Alabama State Lands Division Submerged Lands Permitting

Appendix D Real Estate Plan

Chapter 6 Summary Control of Land Use: Control of Land Use

Appendix F. Real Estate

LEGAL PITFALLS OF RIGHT OF WAY : DELAYS IN ACQUISITION. Darby F. Venza, ROW Attorney

APPENDIX F REAL ESTATE PLAN. Redwood City Harbor Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study, Redwood City, California

WYOMING WATER DISTRICTS. Harriet M. Hageman Hageman and Brighton, P.C.

WASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROCESS GUIDE

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 1272 A BILL ENTITLED

DRAFT REAL ESTATE PLAN APPENDIX C GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRAZOS RIVER FLOODGATES AND COLORADO RIVER LOCKS SYSTEMS FEASIBILITY STUDY

LAND USE APPLICATION

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department proposes to amend 25 CFR 151

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON. D.C MAR

CITY OF GROVER BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tentative Map Checklist

DWR REAL ESTATE COORDINATION PLAN

IRS FORM 8283 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT DONATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT

SKOKOMISH PUBLIC SEWER CONNECTION ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS

DISCLAIMER: Copyright: 2014

DRAFT East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay. Atlantic Coast of New York

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY ORDINANCE NO. WA0-0089

Appendix A. Definitions

MODEL DEED RESTRICTION FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMIT-3 (PASPGP-3) DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR CONSERVATION

Public Notice U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, GALVESTON DISTRICT AND TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

Federal Mandates and Willing Sellers: Real Estate Acquisition for the Missouri River Recovery Program

Authority of Commissioners Court

Downtown Montauk Stabilization Project. Real Estate Plan Appendix

Conservation Design Subdivisions

NARRATIVE (GUIDELINES)

Conservation Easement Stewardship

DEED OF EASEMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY AGRICULTURE RETENTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. BETWEEN, whose address is and is referred to as the Grantor;

Passaic County Open Space, Farmland, & Historic Preservation Trust Fund

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Guide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats

WHEREAS, the Board has reviewed Part 3 of the Full Environmental Assessment Form for the proposed Action.

GENERAL RE-EVALUATION REPORT APPENDIX B: REAL ESTATE SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION PROJECT Chatham County, Georgia and Jasper County, South Carolina

Local units of government control the use of private

RIGHT-of-WAY in INDIAN COUNTRY

Guide to Preliminary Plans

WEST VIRGINIA DIVISION OF FORESTRY Cooperative Forest Legacy Program. Sample Conservation Easement

SUBDIVISION PLAT CHECKLIST. The following information shall be include on the plat:

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL REAL PROPERTY DIVISION

AMENDED DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT

SEQRA (For Land Surveyors) Purpose of this Presentation

Transcription:

APPENDIX C REAL ESTATE PLAN BOULEVARD RESACA, BROWNSVILLE, TX CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS November 19, 2016

Table of Contents Purpose... 3 Project Authority... 3 Project Location and Description... 3 Non-Federal Sponsor... 3 Real Estate Requirements... 4 Sponsor Owned Property... 4 Navigation Servitude... 4 Mitigation Feature... 5 Borrow Material... 5 Access/Staging... 5 Recreation Feature... 5 Project Induced Flooding... 5 Baseline Cost Estimate... 5 Public Law 91-646 Relocation Assistance... 5 Mineral Activity that May affect the Project... 5 Assessment of the NFS s Legal and Professional Capability... 6 Zoning... 6 Description of Facility or Utility Relocation... 6 HTRW or Other Environmental Contaminants... 6 Landowner Opposition... 6 Risks Associated with Acquiring Land Before the Execution of the PCA... 7 Description of Any Other Real Estate Issues Relevant to Planning, Designing, or Implementing the Project.... 7 Land Acquisition Schedule.... 7 Exhibit A: Map... 8 Exhibit B: Surveys... 9... 10 Exhibit C: Assessment of Non-Federal Sponsor s Real Estate Acquisition Capability... 11 Exhibit D: Not Used... 13 2 P age

Purpose This report is intended to supplement the integrated feasibility study-environmental assessment for Boulevard Resaca, Brownsville, Texas. The purpose of this study is to develop an ecosystem restoration plan to restore degraded ecosystem structure, function, and dynamic processes to a less degraded, more natural condition. The Real Estate Plan is tentative in nature; it is for planning purposes only and both the final real property acquisition lines and the real estate cost estimates provided are subject to change even after approval of this report. Project Authority Resolution of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the United States House of Representatives dated 10 November 1999. The final resolution reads as follows: Resolved by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the United States House of Representatives, that the Secretary of the Army is requested to review that report of the Chief of Engineers on Louisiana and Texas Intracoastal Waterway, Corpus Christi, Texas to the Rio Grande, published as House Document No. 402, 77 th Congress, 1 st Session, and other pertinent reports to determine the feasibility of providing improvements to the Resacas in the vicinity of the City of Brownsville, Texas in the interest of flood control, watershed management, environmental restoration and protection, water quality, and other allied purposes. Project Location and Description The study area encompasses the Resaca and adjacent lands between Belthair Street and a weir located at the south end of the Resaca, covering approximately 25.4 acres. The project intent is to restore the Resaca Boulevard Resaca by removing invasive plant species, moving earth to re-grade the bank to a gentler slope that would be less prone to soil erosion during rainfall and high water events, and replanting vegetation native to the system. Once the bank is re-graded and stabilized, native vegetation will be planted along an approximately 30-foot wide corridor along the Resaca bank. Approximately 5 acres along the bank will be restored. Approximately 15 feet of this width will be within a submerged and/or intermittently submerged zone and will include wetland plant types that are native and will provide critical habitat for a variety of fish species, amphibians, wading birds and other native fauna. The remaining 15 feet are along the high bank and will form a riparian corridor. This area would be vegetated with native plant species beneficial to a variety of local and migratory birds. The site is located within the central flyway, one of the major migratory bird paths in North America. The Resacas are the major source of freshwater for these birds in Cameron County. The newly vegetated Resaca bank will aid in further stabilizing the bank with the root systems of plants to minimize erosion, and will also assist in improvements to water quality. (See exhibit A ) Non-Federal Sponsor The District Engineer, Galveston District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), is responsible for the overall management of the study and report preparation. The City of Brownsville is the Non-Federal sponsor for the study and construction of the project. The City of Brownsville was founded in 1848 and finally incorporated in 1853. The City of Brownsville is the entity responsible for the acquisition of the Lands Easements, Right-of-Way, Relocation and Disposal Areas (LERRD) for this project. 3 P age

Real Estate Requirements West Bank of Resaca The NFS is required to have fee title for ecosystem restoration projects (Engineering Regulation [ER] 405-1-12; 12-9). Fee title or Fee Simple Estate is defined by The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal, fifth edition, as: Absolute ownership unencumbered by any other interest or estate, subject only to the limitations imposed by the governmental powers of taxation, eminent domain, police power, and escheat. The City of Brownsville owns 10.77 acres on the west bank of the Resaca that was conveyed by the following two deeds and are illustrated on the survey which can be found as exhibit B. The property was not purchase with Federal Funds. A. Houston and Brownsville Development Company conveyed 76.4 acres to City of Brownsville dated 25 of November 1933 (Vol 253 Page 93) with the following restriction: It being distinctly understood and agreed that all of above property is conveyed and is by the city accepted for use as public parks, and playground, for roads and streets, for drainage and other related public purposes and shall always be used and maintained for such purposes. B. Deed from Sisters of the Incarnate Word Convent of Brownsville To City of Brownsville for 7.58 acres of land dated 12 January 1934 (Vol 253 Page 103) with the following restriction: Purpose of roads, streets, parks and drainage; and it is further stipulated that no public playground or public recreation places whatsoever are to be maintained or permitted on the aforesaid tract of 7.58 acres The sponsor has agreed to condemn its property to clear title. Sponsor Owned Property Property for this project is owned by the City of Brownsville and was not purchased with Federal funds. The federal government does not have any property interests within the project footprint. Navigation Servitude Navigation servitude is the dominant right of the Government under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution (U.S. CONST. Art. I, 8, cl.3) to use, control and regulate the navigable waters of the United States and the submerged lands hereunder for various commerce-related purposes including navigation and flood control. In tidal areas, the servitude extends to all lands below the mean high water mark. In non-tidal areas, the servitude extends to all lands within the bed and banks of a navigable stream that lie below the ordinary high water mark. United States v. Cress, 243 U.S. 316, 37 S.Ct. 380, 61 L.Ed. 746 (1917), Kaiser Aetna v. United States, 444 U.S. 164, 100 S.Ct. 383, 62 L.Ed.2d 332 (1979). The Government s rights under the navigation servitude exist irrespective of the ownership of the banks and bed of a stream below the ordinary high water mark and irrespective of western water rights under 4 P age

prior appropriation doctrine. There is no land subject to navigation servitude within this project. Mitigation Feature No environmental mitigation will be required for the Recommended Plan. Borrow Material The proposed Project does not require the acquisition of any borrow material. Access/Staging All land that will be crossed is owned by the NFS and is available for this project. Recreation Feature The proposed Project does not have any recreation features. Project Induced Flooding No Project induced flooding will result from the construction of the Project. Baseline Cost Estimate The City owned property will have to be condemned to clear title. Due to the age of the tract acquisition, it is assumed that the condemnation will be uncontested. The estimated costs of acquisition is on the Real Estate baseline cost listed in Exhibit D. Public Law 91-646 Relocation Assistance There are no persons or businesses that will need to be relocated due to project implementation. Mineral Activity that May affect the Project The NFS does not own the mineral rights within the project footprint. The potential risks to the government associated with the NFS not owning the mineral rights are sufficiently mitigated and there is no anticipated effect to construction, operation, or maintenance of the project. The City of Brownsville has to approve all oil wells within the city limits. According to City Ordinance Sec. 22-587 (b) a permittee shall not interfere with or damage existing water, sewer, or gas lines; the facilities of public utilities; or any other improvement or facility located on, under or across the course of such rights-of-way. The City of Brownsville will not issue a permit for mineral extraction on City owned property, especially in a densely populated area of the city, such as the project area. Accordingly, the additional costs and time associated with the NFS acquiring the mineral rights far outweigh the risks to the government. 5 P age

Assessment of the NFS s Legal and Professional Capability Non-Federal Sponsor s Real Estate Acquisition Capability Survey will be sent to the City of Brownsville prior to final approval of the project. However, the City of Brownsville has the ability to acquire property for their projects under the City s right of eminent domain. City of Brownville s House Rule Amendment, Article II, Section 9, Right of Eminent Domain: Said city shall have the right of eminent domain and the power to appropriate private property for public purposes whenever the governing authority shall deem it necessary; and to take any private property, within or without the city limits, for any of the following purposes, to-wit: city halls, police stations, jails, calabooses, fire stations and fire alarm systems, libraries, hospitals, sanitariums, auditoriums, market houses, slaughterhouses, reformatories, abattoirs, streets, alleys, parks, highways, playgrounds, sewer systems, storm sewers, sewage disposal plants, filtering beds and emptying grounds for sewer systems, drainage, drainage water, water supply sources, wells, water and electric light and power systems, street car systems, telephone and telegraph systems, gas plants or gas systems, cemeteries, crematories, prison farms, pest houses, and to acquire lands, within or without the city, for any other municipal purpose that may be deemed advisable. That the power herein granted for the purpose of acquiring private property shall include the power of improvement and enlargement of waterworks, including water supply, riparian rights, stand pipes, watersheds, and the construction of supply reservoirs. That in all cases wherein the city exercises the power of eminent domain it shall be controlled as nearly as practicable, by the laws governing the condemnation of property by railroad corporations in this state; the city taking the position of the railroad corporation in any such cases. Zoning No application or enactment of zoning ordinances is proposed in connection with the Project. Description of Facility or Utility Relocation There are powerlines located along the street called Resaca Boulevard which is on located on city owned property. There are no plans to relocate these powerlines. Any conclusion or categorization contained in this report that an item is a utility or facility relocation to be performed by the non-federal sponsor as part of its LERRD responsibilities is preliminary only. The government will make a final determination of the relocations necessary for the construction, operation, or maintenance of the project after further analysis and completion and approval of a final attorney s opinion of compensability for each of the impacted utilities and facilities. HTRW or Other Environmental Contaminants There are no known hazardous or toxic wastes or other environmental contaminants on or within the proposed Project area. Landowner Opposition A public meeting was held March 1, 2016 at the Brownsville Public Utility District at 1425 Robinhood Street, Brownsville, TX 78521. Attendees in addition to members of BPUB and USACE consisted of two local citizens. Both individuals gave positive feedback with no opposition to the Project during the public hearing. 6 P age

Risks Associated with Acquiring Land Before the Execution of the PCA A risk letter will be sent to the City of Brownsville identifying the risks associated with any propertyacquisition prior to the execution of the PPA and will be noted in the final Real Estate Plan. Description of Any Other Real Estate Issues Relevant to Planning, Designing, or Implementing the Project. There are no other real estate issues relevant to Planning, Designing, or implementing the project. Land Acquisition Schedule. Milestones are based on the Project Partnership Agreement being signed Transmittal of ROW drawings & estate(s) 30 days after PPA signed Obtain Surveys 60 days after transmittal of ROW drawings & estate(s) Obtain Title Evidence 60 days after obtaining surveys Obtain Appraisals & Reviews 60 days after obtaining title Authorization to Proceed with Offer 10 days after obtaining appraisals & reviews Conclude Negotiations 90 days after start of negotiations Conduct Closings 45 days to conduct closings Conclude Condemnations 240 days after condemnation process starts Attorney Certify Availability of LERRD 15 days after condemnations concluded Corps Certifies Availability of LERRD 5 days after NFS Attorney Certifies LERRD Review LERRD Credit Request 60 days after receiving LERRD documentation Approve or Deny LERRD Credit Requests 5 days after concluding review of LERRD documentation 7 P age

Exhibit A: Map 8 P age

Exhibit B: Surveys 9 P age

10 P a g e

Exhibit C: Assessment of Non-Federal Sponsor s Real Estate Acquisition Capability 11 P age

12 P age