LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA EXEMPTION. COUNCIL DISTRICT City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Similar documents
Z.I. NO INTERIM CONTROL ORDINANCE (ICO) FOR PROPOSED HISTORIC PRESERVATION OVERLAY ZONE (HPOZ) NEIGHBORHOODS

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Channel Law Group, LLP

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING. 2. Sustain the action of the Deputy Advisory Agency in approving Vesting Tentative Tract No CC.

Los Angeles City Planning Department RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Article 12.5 Exemptions for Agricultural Housing, Affordable Housing, and Residential Infill Projects

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING ZONING INFORMATION FILE. Effective Date: March 15, 2011 ZI 2416 DOWNTOWN DESIGN GUIDE PROJECT AREA

FINDINGS. Goal 3B - Preservation of the City s stable single-family residential neighborhoods.

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Staff Report for Coleman SFD Addition Coastal Development Permit with Hearing

Los Angeles City Planning Commission 200 North Spring Street, Room 532, City Hall, Los Angeles, CA (213)

PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL TO THE CITY CLERK S OFFICE

Strategic Growth Council: Identifying Infill Barriers

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

WILSHIRE - WESTWOOD SCENIC CORRIDOR Specific Plan

City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM. APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE (Other than Owner)

CITY OF RIALTO PLANNING DIVISION

CITY OF RIALTO PLANNING DIVISION ENTITLEMENT APPLICATION

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Open the public hearing, receive public testimony, close the public hearing; and,

COMMERCIAL EXCHANGE BUILDING West 8th Street and 800 South Olive Street CHC HCM ENV CE

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

EXHIBIT G. Exhibit G - Page 1 RVPUB/MO/655751

3. Adopt the Preliminary Use and Management Plan for the property granted to the District.

MEETING DATE: 08/1/2017 ITEM NO: 16 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: JULY 27, 2017 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL LAUREL PREVETTI, TOWN MANAGER

CITY OF LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK ROOM 395, CITY HALL LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

PLANNING DEPARTMENT TRANSMITTAL TO THE CITY CLERK S OFFICE SUPPLEMENTAL CF

AFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 35 AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5 INFORMATIONAL PACKET

IS YOUR CITY READY FOR SENATE BILL 35? Amara Morrison 1111 Broadway, 24 th Floor Oakland, CA

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize guidance on those requirements generally applicable to grant programs.

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Office of the City Engineer 8/5/2014

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

ORDINANCE NO. 972 N.S. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EL PASO DE ROBLES ADDING ARTICLE V. CHAPTER OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ON HISTORIC PRESERVATION

CALIFORNIA - 1 .«A ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Project Analysis... A-1. Findings... F-1. Public Hearing and Communications... P-1

Chapter SWAINSON S HAWK IMPACT MITIGATION FEES

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

Streamlining Affordable Housing Approvals Proposed Trailer Bill

ORDINANCE NO. 1_8_0_1_0_3_

7-3. Engineering and Operations Committee. Board of Directors. 7/11/2017 Board Meeting. Subject. Executive Summary

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO

Planning Commission Report

REVISED REPORT - As of 1/10/17

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department proposes to amend 25 CFR 151

SENATE BILL No. 35. December 5, 2016

FOR LEASE 1028 & 1030 E CESAR E CHAVEZ AVE 3,369 SF OF BUILDINGS ON 16,478 SF OF LAND (46,330 SF OF ADJACENT LAND ALSO AVAILABLE)

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Certified copy of portion of proceedings, Meeting of October 17,2017

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

APPROVAL FOR ACCELERATED PROCESSING DIRECT TO CITY COUNCIL

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

LEGAL NOTICE PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ANTONIO R. VILLARAIGOSA MAYOR. The City Council adopted the action(s), as attached, under Council File No.

STAFF REPORT. City of Ormond Beach Department of Planning. Exception for Outdoor Activity

CALIFORNIA. cfr. i l fi ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

April 12, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL CASE NO.: ENV EIR PROJECT NAME: PROJECT APPLICANT:

ORDINANCE NO. 1_7_1_2_2:._7_

Subdivision Map Act and CEQA Compliance:

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Emerald Parc Filbert Street Oakland, California THIS PDF IS NOT SIZED FOR PRINT

Planning Commission Report

812 Page Street. Item 10 June 21, Staff Report

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 73. Introduced by Assembly Members Chiu and Caballero (Coauthors: Assembly Members Mullin, Santiago, and Ting) December 16, 2016

Venice, California 2318 Lincoln Boulevard Venice, Ca 90291

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

4.2 LAND USE INTRODUCTION

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of December 7, Agenda Item 5A

EXHIBIT E FORM OF CERTIFICATE OF CDLAC PROGRAM COMPLIANCE. T. Bailey Manor Apartments

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT February 15, 2013

SECTION 6 SUBAREA PLAN IMPLEMENTATION POLICIES

LOS ANGELES CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ADVANCE CALENDAR As of Friday, April 22, 2016

ATTACHMENT 1 ORDINANCE ZONING AMENDMENTS

07/16/2014 Item #10E Page 1

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Chapter HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Engineering & Operations Committee Item 7-3 July 10, 2017

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

VARIANCE (Revised 03/11)

City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.2

RESOLUTION NO

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

February 20, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL CASE NO.: ENV EIR PROJECT NAME: PROJECT APPLICANT: 3 rd and Fairfax Mixed-Use Project Third Fairfax, LLC

ORDINANCE NO

Be Happy, Stay Rural!

SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

RESOLUTION NO. PC

Transcription:

COUNTY CLERK'S USE CITY OF LOS ANGELES OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 2 NORTH SPRING STREET, ROOM 36 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 912 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NOTICE OF EXEMPTION (California Environmental Quality Act Section 1562) CITY CLERK'S USE Filing of this form is optional. If filed, the form shall be filed with the County Clerk, 124 E. Imperial Highway, Norwalk, CA 965, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21152 (b). Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21167 (d), the filing of this notice starts a 35-day statute of limitations on court challenges to the approval of the project. Failure to file this notice with the County Clerk results in the statute of limitations being extended to 18 days. LEAD CITY AGENCY COUNCIL DISTRICT City of Los Angeles Department of City Planning 4, 5, 1, 14 PROJECT TITLE LOG REFERENCE Adoption of the Historic Preservation Overlay Zone (HPOZ) Interim Control Ordinance (ICO). CF 14-656 PROJECT LOCATION The HPOZ ICO will encompass the following five neighborhoods: Sunset Square, Carthay Square, Holmby- Westwood, Oxford Square, and El Sereno-Berkshire Craftsman District. DESCRIPTION OF NATURE, PURPOSE, AND BENEFICIARIES OF PROJECT: An Interim Control Ordinance, adopted as an urgency measure pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858, establishing a moratorium on the issuance of building and demolition permits for properties within five proposed HPOZs in order to prevent adverse impacts to historic resources. NAME OF PERSON OR AGENCY CARRYING OUT PROJECT, IF OTHER THAN LEAD CITY AGENCY: CONTACT PERSON Shannon Ryan EXEMPT STATUS: (Check One) AREA CODE 'TELEPHONE NUMBER I 213 978-122 EXT. STATE CEQA GUIDELINES ci MINISTERIAL Sec. 15268 DECLARED EMERGENCY Sec. 15269 CITY CEQA GUIDELINES Art. II, Sec. 2b Art. II, Sec. 2a (1) EMERGENCY PROJECT Sec. 15269(b) &(c) Art. II, Sec. 2a (2)&(3) V CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION Sec. 153 et seq. Art. III, Sec. 1 Class 8 Category (City CEQA Guidelines) OTHER (See Public Resources Code Sec. 218 (b)and set forth state and City guideline provision. JUSTIFICATION FOR PROJECT EXEMPTION: The adoption of the Historic Preservation Overlay Zone (HPOZ) Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 197 (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 1538, Class 8 of the State's Guidelines in that the Project consists of "actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment." The establishment of the HPOZ ICO would allow for the protection of historic resources by preventing the demolition and substantial alteration of properties within the Interim Control Area and in turn would allow for protection of the environment. The proposed Interim Control Ordinance will place a temporary prohibition on construction activities that could result in incompatible alterations, out of scale new construction, or the demolition of irreplaceable historic structures in the proposed Interim Control Area. Without action, the construction activities could jeopardize the continued eligibility of the proposed ICO neighborhoods for Historic Preservation Overlay Zone (HPOZ) status. The temporary action would ensure that the environment is not impaired before the adoption of permanent HPOZs within the Interim Control Area. IF FILED BY APPLICANT, ATTACH CERTIFIED DOCUMENT ISSUED BY THE CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STATING THAT THE DEPARTMENT HAS FOUND THE PROJECT TO BE EXEMPT. SIGNATURETITL ' \ DATE i i.,/ -1-Cin &TY-) Ct.ttg 9/4/14/ (17/1L, FEE: RECEIPT NO. REC'. BY DATE DISTRIBUTION: (1) County Clerk, (2) City Clerk, (3) Agency Record Rev. 12-17-14

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) NARRATIVE: CF 14-656 The Historic Preservation Overlay Zone (HPOZ) Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) or "Project" proposes to create an urgency ordinance, pursuant to California Government Code Section 65858, establishing a temporary moratorium on the issuance of building and demolition permits for properties within five (5) proposed Historic Preservation Overlay Zones (HPOZs) as shown in the attached mapped Interim Control Area, which shall include: (1) Sunset Square Council District 4 (2) Carthay Square Council District 5 (3) Holmby Westwood Council District 5 (4) Oxford Square Council District 1 (5) El Sereno Berkshire Craftsman District Council District 14 The adoption of the Historic Preservation Overlay Zone (HPOZ) Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act of 197 (CEQA), pursuant to Article 19, Section 1538, Class 8 of the State's Guidelines in that the Project consists of "actions taken by regulatory agencies, as authorized by state or local ordinance, to assure the maintenance, restoration, enhancement, or protection of the environment where the regulatory process involves procedures for protection of the environment." The establishment of the HPOZ ICO would allow for the protection of historic resources by preventing the demolition and substantial alteration of properties within the Interim Control Area and in turn would allow for protection of the environment. The proposed Interim Control Ordinance will place a temporary prohibition on construction activities that could result in incompatible alterations, out of scale new construction, or the demolition of irreplaceable historic structures in the proposed Interim Control Area. Without action, the construction activities could jeopardize the continued eligibility of the proposed ICO neighborhoods for Historic Preservation Overlay Zone (HPOZ) status. The temporary action would ensure that the environment is not impaired before the adoption of permanent HPOZs within the Interim Control Area. Additionally, the use of Categorical Exemption Class 8 from the State CEQA Guidelines for the Interim Control Ordinance is consistent with other California jurisdictions which find that the regulations placed upon historic districts are necessary for the protection of the environment and will make sure that construction activities do not degrade the historic resources. CEQA Section 153.2: Exceptions to Categorical Exemptions As explained below, the Project does not satisfy the criteria for exceptions to the application of Section 153, Class 8 of the State CEQA Guidelines: (a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies.

The Project is not exempt under Classes 3, 4, 5, 6 and 11. Furthermore, the Project is located in a typical urbanized area and is not located in a sensitive environment as defined above. This exception does not apply. (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. The Project will create a freeze on the issuance of building permits that could result in incompatible alterations, out of scale new construction, or the demolition of irreplaceable historic structures within the Interim Control Area. No other freeze on building permits exists in the City and no additional projects that would freeze the issuance of building permits are proposed. As such, the Project does not have any cumulative impacts because it does not involve successive projects of the same type, in the same place over time. This is the first Interim Control Ordinance proposed for the Interim Control Area. Though a portion of the Interim Control Area is located near existing Historic Preservation Overlay Zones (HPOZs), the proposed Area has never been a part of an HPOZ or previous ICO. There are currently 29 established HPOZs throughout the City approximately 19, properties or 2% of all properties within the City. As such, HPOZs make up a small fraction of land use regulation in the City as a whole and have no cumulative impact. The ICO will similarly have no cumulative impact. Furthermore, the Interim Control Area covers small fractions of various parts of the City (approximately 2,5 properties in total) and is not clustered in one expansive area. The neighborhoods included in the ICO range from properties in the Westwood Community Plan Area to the Northeast Community Plan Area, with properties in the Hollywood and Wilshire Community Plan Areas in between. There is no successive implementation of the same Project in the same place over time and therefore this exception does not apply to the proposed ICO. (c) Significant Effect - A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The Project involves the establishment of an Interim Control Ordinance that will allow for the temporary protection of historic resources until permanent Historic Preservation Overlay Zone Ordinances can be adopted and will not have any significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. The ICO will allow for the protection of the environment by preventing adverse impacts to historic resources within the Interim Control Area. It is a typical regulation that falls under a standard regulatory action as permitted by state law (Government Code Section 65858) in order to "protect the public health, safety, and welfare." The Interim Control Area is made up of typical urbanized residential districts with no known unusual circumstances or potentially unusual circumstances. The Area is not located near sensitive habitats such as wetlands or endangered species and is not located in extreme hillsides. The temporary freeze on certain types of building permits will not create an unusual circumstance that has a significant effect on the environment because the regulations affect approximately 2,5 out of 88, parcels in the City of Los Angeles. This represents less than 1/3 of 1% of properties in the city not sufficiently substantial to reshape development patterns or real estate market dynamics such that unusual circumstances could occur.

.(d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR. The only designated State Scenic Highway in Los Angeles County is Route 2 from 2.7 miles north of State Route 21 at La Canada to the San Bernardino County Line. The proposed Interim Control Area does not include Route 2 and therefore does not include any State Scenic Highways and will not result in damage to scenic resources including trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources. Furthermore, the Project will prevent the damage to historic resources within the Interim Control Area, including historic street patterns. (e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The Project is not located on a site listed pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code; therefore, the exception does not apply. (t) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The proposed Project would not cause an adverse change in the significance of a historical resource; rather, the proposed Project would allow for the protection of identified historic structures through the adoption of the Historic Preservation Overlay Zone Interim Control Ordinance (ICO). The proposed ICO would place a temporary prohibition on construction activities such as alterations, demolition, and new construction that could result in incompatible alterations, new construction, and demolition of irreplaceable historic structures within the Interim Control Area. Without the implementation of the ICO, these structures may be altered in such a way that they would lose their character-defining historic features or be completely demolished. The ICO would prevent out of scale additions, significant alterations, and demolition in order to protect and prevent adverse changes to historic structures.

Interim Control Ordinance Maps 1. Sunset Square Council District 4 2. Carthay Square Council District 5 3. Holmby Westwood Council District 5 4. Oxford Square Council District 1 5. El Sereno Berkshire Craftsman District Council District 14

Ui OLLYWOOD BLVD Ui z ; Ui I > ZF ce Ui CO GARDNER ST co r. 213:3 5: Lii -J 2 SELMA AVE w > - UI z HAWTHORN AVE 2 5 o. w Ui Co Ui z Ui 14 88 6 gl 135.3 79.42-6 L I I s'p 135 i 27.29 1 132 IT 6,F- 6 w _ < 6 5 2'4.9 135.5 6 cc: Cs] SUNSET BLVD z 6 Interim Control Ordinance (ICO 1. Sunset Square co S'LY LINE OF LOTS 3, 2, 21, & THE VVIY LINE OF THE E'LY 1' OF LOT 21, TR 339 5 25 5 Feet CF/121714 DATA SOURCES: DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING-DEPARTMENT & BUREAU OF ENGINEERING C. M. 147 B 177, 147 B 181 Area Mapped

Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) 2. Carthay Square CF/12414 DATA SOURCES: DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING-DEPARTMENT & BUREAU OF ENGINEERING 4 2 4 Feet C. M. 129 B 173, 132 B 173, 132 B 177 Area Mapped

4R rotsikir-l-i-..lll 1,1frs te, ea,e A7.5 _ HILGARD A,,T, dm, 'a> 2 t SELBY AvE VP\ ITAVIOXINV.Yr \ \,\.4,,./ _, /` )JON YItN ^ "x`5 4:, % \ \ \ G',' \ '-L1--'-4-1-k<- \/- -77

Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) 4. Oxford Square CF/12114 [...URGES- DEPARTMENT OF GIN PLANNING-DEE NT BUREAU OF ENGINEERING 3 15 3 Feel C. M. 129 B 185, 129 B 189, 132 B 185, 132 B 189

IMF 1- M`MM-1111-M, 6 < MOFFATT ST CITY BDRY LINE ESTAB 15 1 FEB 9, 1912' venb.al.e.avr. ORD 23964 OT I i ALHAMBRA ROAD MAYCREST AVE ATLAS ST BIRCH ST co,3b, f al-* 6 Av BERKSHIRE DR 197.98 co 22 6 GRAND AVE NEWTONIA DR 11 26.' MAIN ST NORTH Interim Control Ordinance (ICO) 5. El Sereno Berkshire Craftsman District 3 15.4ttat, NORTH 3 Feet CF/12414 DATA SOURCES: DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING-DEPARTMENT & BUREAU OF ENGINEERING C. M. 147 A 239 Area Mapped