Historic Preservation Incentives Workshop

Similar documents
Historic Preservation Ordinance Draft- 6/3/16 Page 1

ORDINANCE NO

Title 8 - ZONING Division AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Chapter RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS

Chapter DENSITY AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENTS

Residential Density Bonus

Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards via Density Bonus

Senate Bill No CHAPTER 928. An act to amend Section of the Government Code, relating to housing.

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

STAFF REPORT VARIANCE FROM LDC CHAPTER 17, SECTION 15(d)(1)(a) CASE NO

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance

ORDINANCE NUMBER O- (NEW SERIES) DATE OF FINAL PASSAGE

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

WHEREAS, on October 6, 2015, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing and recommended the proposed Ordinance Amendments; and

Municipal Council has directed staff to report annually on the nature of Variances granted by the Committee of Adjustment.

CHAPTER SECOND UNITS

EXHIBIT B FINDINGS OF FACT BEND DEVELOPMENT CODE (BDC) UPDATE AMENDMENT PZ

Pinellash AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES. offered through the PINELLAS COUNTS LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE

Planning Commission Report

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

ARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS

6-6 Livermore Development Code

Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

City of Long Beach Mills Act Program Pre Application Workshop. Saturday, June 27, :30 am 12:30 pm Long Beach Public Library Lobby

ORDINANCE NO

INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS

(1) At least ten percent of the total units are designated for low income households.

VICINITY MAP. Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR & VAR January 9, 2014 Page 2 of 11 ATTACHMENTS

City of Long Beach Mills Act Program Pre-Application Workshop. Saturday, February 23, :00 am 12:00 pm Long Beach Gas & Oil Auditorium

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

ADUs in San Francisco May 2017

Conduct a hearing on the appeal, consider all evidence and testimony, and take one of the following actions:

Consistency in language between County planning and code documents. Streamlining the review and permitting process whenever possible

L DC A M E N D M E N T F O R SETBACK R E L I E F

City of Blue Springs, Missouri. Main Center Redevelopment Corporation Incentive Policy

AMENDED ZONING BY-LAW ARTICLE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

Chapter 12 RMH MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE

Chapter CONSTRUCTION CODES

TOWN OF LOS ALTOS HILLS January 11, 2018 Staff Report to the Planning Commission

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

Multi-family dwellings (including assisted living facilities), Public buildings, facility or land; and,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL. State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section 65915

NEW BUSINESS. Aerial Map. Case #11-1. Neighborhood Context

ORDINANCE NO. 04- NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA:

Introduction & Background

[2015 INCENTIVE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATION REPORT] STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP)

Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862)

Town of Truckee. Contents. Article I - Development Code Enactment and Applicability. Chapter Purpose and Effect of Development Code...

Zoning Administrator. Agenda Item

CHAPTER DENSITY BONUS, WAIVERS AND INCENTIVES

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura, State of California, ordains as follows: Section 1

Chapter 17.90: Affordable Housing Incentives

ABILENE ZONING REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Key Provisions in Chart: Zones Floor Area Ratio Setbacks Parking Approval Timeframe Owner Occupancy Lot Size Fees HCD Oversight Amnesty Program

2.7 R-6: High Density Residential District

Chapter 10 RD TWO-FAMILY (DUPLEX) RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE

CITY OF APALACHICOLA ORDINANCE

RESOLUTION OF MEMORIALIZATION OF THE LAND USE BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF HARVEY CEDARS, COUNTY OF OCEAN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO.

Lacey UGA Residential density

SECTION 73 CHESTER VILLAGE DISTRICT REGULATIONS

ORDINANCE NO

Zoning for Housing in Lenox

GC General Commercial District

CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7, 2016 NEW BUSINESS REVIEW AND UPDATE THE CITY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS LAW MAYOR LAUREN MEISTER

Accessory Dwelling Units


ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

PUBLIC NUISANCES & DETRIMENTAL NONCONFORMITIES

UNDERSTANDING THE 2017 HOUSING BILLS Bay Area Planning Directors Association

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

SB 1818 Q & A. CCAPA s Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding SB 1818 (Hollingsworth) Changes to Density Bonus Law

Borough of Haddonfield New Jersey

New Planning Code Summary: HOME-SF and Density Bonus Projects

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

Yes. No. No. Yes. Not applicable. To add a new 39A, Inclusionary Housing Overlay Zone

Cartersville Code of Ordinances Historic Preservation Commission

R3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE)

18.15 (Residential Density Bonus) of Title 18 (Zoning) ofthe Palo Alto

Town Centre Community Improvement Plan

HEIGHTS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

ARTICLE IX. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 900. Purpose.

a. To insure compatible relationships between land use activities;

Neighborhood Conservation District Code Revisions CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT NCD-COCONUT GROVE 27 JANUARY

NONCONFORMING LOTS, STRUCTURES, AND USES.

Density Bonus Program Phase 2 City of New Westminster

Community Development

Attachment 2: Historic Preservation Program Comparison of Select Colorado and U.S. Communities

Housing Assistance and Housing Programs at Work in Unincorporated Pinellas County

AFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 35 AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5 INFORMATIONAL PACKET

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura, State of California, ordains as follows: Section 1

PROPERTY EVALUATION: HWY 82, OLD SNOWMASS CONOCO

Transcription:

Historic Preservation Incentives Workshop CITY OF LAGUNA BEACH OCTOBER 19, 2015

Format of the Meeting First portion of the workshop: Presentation from City Staff about current incentives offered to historic properties. City Staff: Greg Pfost, Director of Community Development Nancy Csira, Zoning Administrator (Prior Heritage Committee Liaison) Martina Caron, Senior Planner/Heritage Committee Liaison Second portion of the workshop: Public Comments Third portion of the workshop: Comments and Discussion by the Heritage Committee

Workshop Objectives o Educational Meeting held on 9/15/15 o Memo from the City Attorney was distributed o On 9/21/15, the Heritage Committee recommended that a series of workshops be held to address the different topic areas in the proposed historic preservation ordinance. o Future meetings: o NOVEMBER 16, 2015: Historic Ratings and Historic Criteria Workshop o JANUARY 2016 (date TBD): Opt Out Provision Workshop o Other topics: Process to modify a historic structure Ordinance format o Tonight's meeting will focus on Historic Preservation Incentives.

Historic Preservation Element Goal: Preserve and enhance building, structures of historic significance in Laguna Beach. Assuring neighborhoods which have a preponderance of older homes and which greatly contribute to the village atmosphere be maintained as cohesive neighborhood units through consistency of size, scale and character. Policies: 1.3- Protect historic buildings through the implementation and expansion of incentive programs specifically designed to encourage rehabilitation and preservation. Incentive programs could include flexible development standards, fee waivers and property tax reductions.

Current Historic Incentives o LBMC section 25.45.006 lists the historic preservation incentives offered for structures on the Historic Register. Parking Building Permit and Planning Application Fees Building Code Deviations Additions to Historic Commercial Structures Setback Flexibility Density Bonuses Official Recognition Financial Incentives Relief from Nonconforming Structure Requirement o Currently, no incentives are offered to structures on the Inventory

Parking Incentives Single Family Dwellings: One parking space required instead of 2 spaces if no more than 50% addition is proposed. Multi Family Dwellings: No additional parking required if ½ the required parking is provided and the additions do not exceed 50%. Commercial Structures: C- Rated structure: Up to a 50% parking reduction E/K-Rated: up to a 75% parking reduction The parking reductions are based on the degree to which the historic character of the building is preserved and/or enhanced. The historic character of the building shall include exterior and visible interior elements if, and only if, integral to the historic building design.

Building Permit and Planning Fees All building permit and planning application fees for structures placed on the historic register will be refunded for those projects if, prior to the finalization of the building permit, the heritage committee finds the changes are consistent with approved plans and preserve the historic character of the subject building. Fees are paid and then refunded after the construction has commenced per the approved plans.

Building Code Deviations The city may allow deviations from Title 14 of this code requirement (Building and Construction Code) when findings can be made by the director of community development/building Official that the historic building is in conformance with the state of California Historical Building Code.

Additions to Historic Commercial Structures Historic commercial structures may add up to fifteen percent of the existing floor area, not to exceed five hundred square feet, without providing additional parking and without bringing any existing nonconformities into compliance with current zoning regulations, subject to review and approval by the design review board. The addition must be removed if the historical building is removed from the historic register. Retail: Typically it would require an additional 2 parking spaces Restaurant: Typically would require 5 additional parking spaces

Setback Flexibility Additions to historic structures shall be allowed to maintain setbacks up to the line of existing encroachments; provided, that all setbacks as required by the Uniform Building Code are maintained for new construction.

Density Bonuses Local Business Professional Zone and the Downtown Specific Plan Area E exceptional or K key rated structure may add residential units at a density of one unit per one thousand square feet of lot area, provided the E or K rated structure is preserved. Typically, one unit per two thousand square feet of lot area is required.

Official Recognition Properties on the historic register shall be eligible for special designation plaques.

Financial Incentives Mills Act: Owners of properties rated K or E on the historic register are eligible to apply for a Mill s Act contract. Owners of any historic property listed on the historic register are eligible to apply for any other local, state and national financial benefits, if any. California Government Code, Article 12, Sections 50280-50290 Potential Mills Act Savings: The savings vary from property to property, and have ranged from 20% to 70% based on the County Tax Assessor's property valuations in accordance with the state law formula.

Relief from Nonconforming Structure Requirements (1) Exempt from non-conforming variances if the additions do not diminish or detract from the historic significance of the original structure, and if such addition is found to be compatible in scale and character with the surrounding neighborhood. (2) Properties located in multifamily zones (R-2 and R-3), where only one unit currently exists, may apply for additional units without bringing existing nonconformities into conformance, if it is determined that the additional unit will not diminish or detract from the historic significance of the original structure, and if such additional unit is found to be compatible in scale and character with the surrounding neighborhood.

Success Stories 380 Anita Street 2560 Iris Way 654 Catalina Street

380 Anita Street Project: 496 square-foot living area addition and a 71 square-foot garage addition to a single-family residence.

380 Anita Street Incentives: The applicant was allowed one covered parking space and to construct additions in line with the existing nonconforming rear setback. Zoning/Planning and building fees were refunded ($5,852.48). Mills Act Savings: 2014-2015 Tax Bill: $8,450 2015-2016 Tax Bill: $3,377

2560 Iris Way Project: 500 square-foot garage, a 485 square-foot deck addition and 124 square-foot addition to an accessory structure. A variance was required to encroach into the front setback with the garage.

2560 Iris Way Incentives: Zoning/Planning and building fees were refunded ($10,963.89). Mills Act Savings: 2011-2012 Tax Bill: $9,884 2012-2013 Tax Bill: $2,962

654 Catalina Street Project: 510 square-foot living area addition and a 393 squarefoot tandem garage addition to a single-family residence (2005). Hardscaping, gas fire pit, patio trellis (2011).

654 Catalina Street Incentives: Additions in line with the existing nonconforming rear setback. Zoning/Planning and building fees were refunded ($8,038.06). Mills Act Savings: 2012-2013 Tax Bill: $12,251 2013-2014 Tax Bill: $10,363

Workshop Discussion 1. What additional incentives should be given to historic properties? 2. Should incentives continue to only be given to properties on the Register? 3. What incentives should be granted if a property is not listed on the inventory or register? 4. What process should be required to review/approve the incentives?