An Approach for Re-Engineering Organizational Structure of Real Estate Valuation System in Turkey

Similar documents
AN APPROACH FOR RE-ENGINEERING ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF REAL ESTATE VALUATION SYSTEM IN TURKEY. Nuri ERDEM, Mehmet ÇETE TURKEY

The Pros and Cons of Building Licensed Offices of Surveying and Cadastre in Turkey

Cadastre or Land Administration: A Case Study of Turkey

The Needs for Improvement in Turkish Land Administration System: Lessons Learned from German Case

Design and Determine 3D Cadastral Systems: A Case Study of Turkey Hicret GURSOY SURMENELI* and Mehmet ALKAN* (Turkey)

Creating real estate maps by using GIS: A case study of Atakum-Samsun/Turkey

THE PROS AND CONS OF BUILDING LICENSED OFFICES OF SURVEYING AND CADASTRE IN TURKEY

FIG Commission 3 Spatial Information Management. Report of Activities 2009

TURKISH CHAMBER OF SURVEY AND CADASTRE ENGINEERS (HKMO)

Property Based Land Information Systems of Turkey

Aalborg Universitet. CLIMA proceedings of the 12th REHVA World Congress volume 6 Heiselberg, Per Kvols. Publication date: 2016

Analyses of the Results of Land Consolidation Studies by GIS

Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

Data: The Unhidden Mystery of Turkish Property Valuation System

by Tahsin YOMRALIOGLU, Bayram UZUN & Recep NISANCI Department of Surveying Engineering Karadeniz Technical University Trabzon, Turkey

Quality Improvement of the Real Estate Cadastre in Serbia

Benchmarking Cadastral Systems Results of the Working Group 7.1

Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

Presented at the FIG Congress 2018, May 6-11, 2018 in Istanbul, Turkey

URBAN REGENERATION FINANCING AND LAND VALUE CAPTURE IN MALAYSIA. SABARIAH EN1 BSc (Hons) in Estate Management Master of Land Resource Management

D DAVID PUBLISHING. Mass Valuation and the Implementation Necessity of GIS (Geographic Information System) in Albania

Cadastral Template. FIG-Commission 7 Annual Meeting, Verona, Italia, 12 Sept Daniel Steudler

M A N N E S M A N N A.S / REAL ESTATE AND PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT Bodrum/MUĞLA

THE CADASTRE AND RELATED PROBLEMS IN TURKEY Osman DEMİR and Mehmet ÇETE (TR)

THE XXV FIG INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS IN MALAYSIA Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, June 2014 at Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre

Problems and Solution Proposals in Integration of Cadastral Data into Geographical Information System (GIS) in Turkey

UNECE workshop on: Cadastral and real estate registration systems: Economic information for real estate markets in the UNECE region

CADASTRE 2014: New Challenges and Direction

Developing a Performance Review Questionnaire for Hong Kong Cadastral Survey System

Egyptian Nationwide Title Cadastre System

Land Consolidation, Valuation and Cadastre

Member of Salahaddin University Campus design with Committee of architects

The Digital Cadastral Database and the Role of the Private Licensed Surveyors in Denmark

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB3229 Project Name. Land Registry and Cadastre Modernization Project Region

An Approach to Support Low Income Families Housing Needs in Developing Countries

An Alternative Approach to Land Compensation Process to Open Urban Arteries

Land Information System as new instrument for Land Administration: Case Examples. Mike Cheremshynskyi Consultant, Land Administration Expert

Lessons for federated countries that have state land registries the Australian experience

Importance of Spatial Data Infrastructure in the UNECE Region. Amie Figueiredo INSPIRE Conference 2016 Barcelona, 26 September 2016

Land Valuation Issues of Expropriation Applications in Turkey

Towards LADM country cadastral profile case Poland

From 2D representation of the buildings into cadastral maps towards 3D GIS applications and BIM a case study for Prishtina

Fiscal Cadastral Reform and the Implementation of CAMA in Cape Town: financing transformation

Commission Chair

A Comparison Between Current Land Readjustment Implementations In Turkey and Value-Based Approach YILMAZER SeçkIn and ŞAŞKIN Önder, Turkey

Building Integrated Land Information Systems and Development of NSDI

Development of Multipurpose Land Administration Systems

THINKING OUTSIDE THE TRIANGLE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF MODERN LAND MARKETS. Ian Williamson

Securing Land Rights for Broadband Land Acquisition for Utilities in Sweden

A NOMINAL ASSET VALUE-BASED APPROACH FOR LAND READJUSTMENT AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION USING GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS

The importance of changes in land surveyors education

Supporting Capacity Development for Sustainable Land Administration Infrastructures

PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) APPRAISAL STAGE Report No.: PIDA Project Name. Region Country Sector(s) Theme(s)

Rural Land Markets in Central and Western Europe

Results of Central European Land Knowledge Center (CELK) Activities

GIS Projects and Systematic Land Registration in Romania Brasov Case Study

A New Vision on Cadastral Data Model

The Necessity for Interdisciplinary Cooperation as a Part of FIG Activity

Urban Management Land Information System UMLIS: Facing Urban Challenges through Efficient Revenue Collection

RESEARCH BRIEF TURKISH HOUSING MARKET: PRICE BUBBLE SEPTEMBER 2014 SUMMARY. A Cushman & Wakefield Research Publication OVERVIEW

REAL ESTATE VALUATION IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES. Dr. Nikolai TRIFONOV, FRICS, HonAAPOR, HonOKO, HonOSV. Belarusian Society of Valuers, President

Advances in Modern Land Administration Cadastre 2014 in the Year 2006

The Role of Cadastre in Agricultural Reform Applications of Turkey: Case Study of Trabzon Province

Greetings from Denmark. Property Rights, Restrictions and Responsibilities - A Global Land Management Perspective. Wonderful Copenhagen

Actual Developments of Land Consolidation in Finland. Mikko UIMONEN, Finland

Utilizing 3D Building and 3D Cadastre Geometries for Better Valuation of Existing Real Estate

Galicia 2009 Regional Workshop on Land Tenure and Land Consolidation. FAO s Experience with Land Development Instruments in Europe

Cadastral Template 2003

Current Law Legislation for Land Consolidation in Turkey

Participants of the Ministerial Meeting on Housing and Land Management on 8 October 2013 in Geneva

The Challenge to Implement International Cadastral Models Case Finland 1

Geoinformation Technologies in Land Management and Beyond: Case of Georgia

Bibliometric Analysis Of Articles Presented Under Commission 7: A Case Of The 25th Fig Congress In Malaysia In 2014

Public restrictions on transfer of agricultural lands in Turkey

Cadastre 2020 a Vision for a Future Cadastral System in Poland

Test and Implementation of DATR System in Hungary

Land Markets and Land Rights in support of the Millennium Development Goals

Good Land Governance for the 2030 Agenda

Public private collaboration model in the cadastral workflow in Denmark

Creation Land Administration in Formal and Informal Environment. FIG Commission 7 Working Group 1

Opportunities for Surveyors in Modern Land Markets

COMMISSION 7 CADASTRE AND LAND MANAGEMENT WORK PLAN

ISSUES OF EFFICIENCY IN PUBLIC REAL ESTATE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

BUSI 452 Case Studies in Appraisal II

The Underground Cadastre and Its Implementations in Turkey

Land Evaluation in Urban Development Process in Germany

The Role of Geodesy in Modernization of Croatian Railways

LAND ADMINISTRATION IN CANADA HISTORICAL WISDOM AND MODERN CHALLENGES IN QUEBEC LAND ADMINISTRATION: FROM PAPER CADASTRAL MAPS TO ON-LINE SERVICES

KHANALIBAYLI UNECE WPLA

The Cadastral Template 2.0, From Design to Implementation

Ownership Data in Cadastral Information System of Sofia (CIS Sofia) from the Available Cadastral Map

Re-engineering engineering the cadastre to support e-governmente

Policy Issue Networks

LIS Development Project and Measures Proposed to Enhance Trust in the Land Administration System in Uganda

National Spatial Data Infrastructure development in Republic of Macedonia

First Steps and Further Steps: Creation of Property Market Estonia Case Study

Incorporating Sustainable Development Objectives into ICT Enabled Land Administration Systems - Case Study Switzerland

Aspect of preliminary activities in the function of supporting NSDI

UNECE Working Party on Land Administration. Report on the Activities Carried Out by the UNECE WPLA Since the Committee's 72nd Session

GIS & GPS Applications in Valuation/Appraisal Assessments

Transcription:

An Approach for Re-Engineering Organizational Structure of Real Estate Valuation System in Turkey Nuri ERDEM and Mehmet CETE, Turkey Keywords: Real estate, Valuation, Organizational Structure, Re-Engineering, Turkey. SUMMARY Real estate values are needed in many activities such as real estate sale, taxation, compulsory purchase, mortgage, insurance, privatization and nationalization. Therefore, countries build up their valuation systems and determine the real estate values both to use in different applications and to provide transparency in the market. Similar to the situation in many other systems, real estate valuation systems need to be re-engineered over time based on the changing expectations of societies, new organizational structures, modern trends, technological developments and so on. Turkey is one of those countries where a reengineering process in real estate valuation is needed. Real estate valuations for taxation purposes are carried out by the municipalities without sufficient data on real estate characteristics and sales prices in the country. Some other public organizations, such as General Directorates of Highways and State Hydraulic Works, determine real estate values for compulsory purchases through the commissions set up in their institutions. Members of the commissions are mostly not real estate valuation experts. Mortgage and insurance based valuations are carried out by private valuation corporations. Valuations for the purposes of privatization and nationalization are performed by relevant administrations. The country does not have a leading public authority to organize and supervise the overall valuation system or works. This paper, firstly, introduces current organizational structure of the real estate valuation system in Turkey. Then, it describes the issues experienced during the valuation works carried out by both public and private organizations. It provides an approach for reengineering organizational structure of real estate valuation system in Turkey. Sofia, Bulgaria, 17-21 May 2015 1/8

An Approach for Re-Engineering Organizational Structure of Real Estate Valuation System in Turkey Nuri ERDEM and Mehmet CETE, Turkey 1. INTRODUCTION Real estate appraisal is required for both public applications (such as taxation, expropriation, nationalization, privatization, real estate transaction and registry of an easement) and private sector applications (such as capital market, banking, credit facility and insurance). Therefore it is very important for countries to build up an infrastructure of real estate appraisal in order to ensure the transparency of real estate markets and realize public/private sector applications to be made equitably. Today, different techniques and methodologies are used for valuation of real property. From location of the estate to the characteristics thereof, several factors and concepts are available but these methods are not holistic, accurate or fast and many of them are complex. If real estate appraisal system of Turkey is examined, it can be seen that the country does not have healthy regulations, an appropriate organizational structure, databases and models of real estate appraisal. The main problem lies in the fact that there are contradictions in property appraisals in Turkey. This situation causes a number of problems such as different values appraised by different organizations for the same property. Therefore building up a wellfunctioning valuation system is required in the country in order to carry out appropriate real estate appraisals to use not only in taxation but also in other fields. Although this need has been declared many times in many academic and professional platforms, very few works could be carried out to define main characteristics of a well-functioning Turkish real estate valuation system. The aim of this paper is to evaluate efficiency of present Turkish real estate appraisal system and to submit some proposals to develop its efficiency. In this context, at first, general structure of current Turkish real estate valuation system is described. Then, the efficiencies of these systems are evaluated and the need for improvement in Turkish real estate appraisal system is defined. At the second part of the paper, it is aimed to examine a good operating real estate appraisal system and to get some experiences for Turkish case. At the end, some recommendations are submitted to re-engineering organizational structure of real estate valuation system in Turkey. Sofia, Bulgaria, 17-21 May 2015 2/8

2. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF REAL ESTATE VALUATION SYSTEM IN TURKEY In this section, current real estate valuation system in Turkey has been investigated in detail in order to determine the problems of the sector and to mention what should be done to reach the international standards. For this purpose, some information about the subject is given in subtitles. 2.1. The Importance of Establishing the Organizational Structure According to Business Dictionary, organizational structure is the typically hierarchical arrangement of lines of authority, communications, rights and duties of an organization. Organizational structure determines how the roles, power and responsibilities are assigned, controlled, and coordinated, and how information flows between the different levels of management. A structure depends on the organization s objectives and strategy. In a centralized structure, the top layer of management has most of the decision making power and has tight control over departments and divisions. In a decentralized structure, the decision making power is distributed and the departments and divisions may have different degrees of independence (URL_1). That s why organizational structure of real estate valuation system is very important factor of collecting immovable property taxes. So, they should be properly developed to build up economic conditions effectively. When valuation systems of different countries are examined, it is seen that there are many kinds of organizational structure around the world. It changes mostly depending on the politic and administrative structures and traditions of countries. While some countries have good operating organizational structure of property valuation system, the others haven t got it in valuation processes just like Turkey. Turkey is one of the countries where an organizational re-engineering process is needed in real estate valuation. Real estate valuations for taxation purposes are carried out by the municipalities without sufficient data on real estate characteristics and sales prices. Some other public organizations, such as General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre, Capital Market Board, Governorships, Housing Development Administration, Special Provincial Administration, Revenue Administration, General Directorates of Highways, State Hydraulic Works, etc., determine real estate values for compulsory purchases through the commissions set up in their institutions. Members of the commissions are mostly not real estate valuation experts. Mortgage and insurance based valuations are carried out by private valuation corporations. Valuations for the purposes of privatization and nationalization are performed by relevant administrations. The country does not have a public authority to organize and supervise the overall valuation system or works. 2.2. Organizational Structure of Property Valuation Valuation works for taxation purpose is carried out by municipalities in Turkey. However, they do not evaluate purchase prices in those works and do not have a database for object characteristics (Cete at al., 2006). Also many institutions like the General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre, Capital Market Board, Governorships, Housing Development Sofia, Bulgaria, 17-21 May 2015 3/8

Administration, Special Provincial Administration, General Directorate for Highways, Revenue Administration, and the others are carrying out valuation works for expropriation. On the other hand, valuation works of private sector (mortgage, insurance, etc.) are handling by appraisal companies. As a result, there is a gap in organizational structure of the Turkish real estate valuation system because current system has been structured overtime. Turkey needs an institution to assume the duty of standard and policy making for property valuation (Cesur, 2012). In late 1980 s, when foreign investment companies started to co-operate with Turkish companies in line with the economic developments, appraisal of real estate and collecting tax from them become necessary (Yilmaz, 2013). As a result, appraisal practice began to be developed. In recent years, some crucial steps have been taken in appraisal such as organization of Appraisal Institute courses and establishment of Appraisers Association in Turkey. Those steps are follows in chronological order (Ozcelik, 2004): 2001: Appraisers Association was established in Turkey (DUD). 2001: Capital Markets Board of Turkey (CMB) made arrangements for Appraisal Companies. 2002: Instructors were trained at a University for Appraisal Principles Course. 2002: CMB gave the first exam for certification of appraisers. 2007: The concept of real estate appraiser has entered to our laws with mortgage law in the first time. 2007: Association of Licensed Appraisal Companies (LİDEBİR) was established as a platform based in Istanbul. 2010: The Turkish Union of Real Estate Appraisers (UREA) was established. Capital Markets Board of Turkey decided to organize market and defined two types of appraisers; Residential Appraiser or Real Estate Appraiser. The number of licensed real estate appraiser is 2141 and the number of licensed residential appraiser is 224 people according to data of the year 2012. Real Estate Appraiser s skill covers Residential Appraiser s. There is no another authority to giving permission to people to doing valuation business. Personal certification only are given by Capital Markets Board of Turkey (CMB). The main functions of the Board is permissions on real estate appraisal foundation (URL_2). The requirements to obtain real estate appraisal license are; Being a four-year university graduate, Real estate licensing exam in a specialization to be successful, The candidate must be at least 3 years experience in the field of real estate appraisal. In 2010, the Turkish Union of Real Estate Appraisers (UREA) has been established. Main duties dedicated to the Union are: to carry out researches to provide development in real estate market and real estate valuation; to educate and certificate real estate appraisers; to form professional rules and valuation standards; to prevent unfair competitions; to establish coordination with other organizations; Sofia, Bulgaria, 17-21 May 2015 4/8

to inform members about professional developments; to prepare and publish statistics on real estate values in both regional and national level. In June 2008, the Loan Agreement between Turkey and the World Bank for Land Registry and Cadastre Modernization Project has been signed. One of the components of the project is Property Valuation and it is carried out by the General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre (URL_3). Within the property valuation component, it is aimed to develop a real estate valuation policy by underlying the need for changes in the governing structure, establishing the standards in the valuation studies. One of the objects of the property valuation component is to carry out a mass property valuation. Building the mass valuation system in Turkey will provide calculating the property values in parallel with market value. And it will be provide a valuation system model with the other benefits (Yildiz at al., 2015). 3. THE ISSUES EXPERIENCED IN THE TURKISH REAL ESTATE VALUATION SYSTEM Today, more than 30 institutions and organizations are carrying out real estate valuations in Turkey. There is no responsible authority to provide coordination among these institutions and organizations (Erdem and Cete, 2013). Many public institutions have been authorized to carry out real estate appraisals when they need values without an umbrella or leading institution. Some government institutions also carry out valuation works especially for expropriation purpose. Each municipality and government institution has its own valuation committee to carry out these works. Databases in which real estate characteristics and sale prices are stored to use in valuation works could not been constructed over time (Erdem and Cete, 2013; Cete, 2012). According to Candas and Yomralioglu (2014), real estate appraisal results should be recorded in the national geographical database and put into service of related institutions in national and international standards in order to define regional differences and the factors effecting value. There is a need for a design for the re-engineering process of the Turkish real estate valuation system. This design for the processing steps that must be followed when performing presented proposal outlines a workflow diagram in Figure 1. The approach developed should be discussed with valuation experts in both public and the private sectors and with relevant academicians. Then, if necessary, it should be revised based on the results of the discussions. Sofia, Bulgaria, 17-21 May 2015 5/8

Implementation of a comprehensive analysis on the current situation of the real estate valuation system in Turkey Investigation of expectations of valuation experts from the new system Identification of good practices in real estate valuation Examining good practices to get inspirations for Turkey Developing a legal, organizational and technical valuation model for Turkey Discussing the developed model with experts and, if necessary, carrying out some revisions Implementing the model in a pilot area Determining the final form of the model considering the issues experienced during the pilot project Figure 1. The basic steps of the re-structuring process in the Turkish real estate appraisal system (Erdem and Cete, 2013). 4. CONCLUSION When taken into account the evaluations on efficiency of Turkish valuation system above, it can be easily said that there is need for re-engineering in real estate valuation system in Turkey. As a result of the evaluation, it is seen that there is a need for a leading institution that controls and regulates for all valuation works. The responsible authorities for real estate taxation are municipalities in the country. Municipalities should carry out taxation based real estate valuations. This must be done with mass valuation methods. In this process, if the relevant municipality does not have adequate infrastructure and experience, valuations can be carried out by tender process. It means, private companies of real estate valuation can perform the mass appraisal works. For this, building up infrastructures for both real estate characteristics and sales prices are very important. Private companies can also provide data for those infrastructures and thus all reliable information can be shared between public and private organizations. The valuations for expropriations and other purposes should also be made by the experts based on the appropriate regulations. Sofia, Bulgaria, 17-21 May 2015 6/8

REFERENCES Candas, E., and Yomralioglu, T., 2014, Land Valuation Problems of Turkey, FIG Congress 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 16-21 June. Cesur, M., 2012, Development of Valuation in Turkey under the Land Registry and Cadastre Modernization Project, FIG Working Week 2012, Rome, Italy, 6-10 May. Cete, M., Magel, H., and Yomralioglu, T., 2006, the Needs for Improvement in Turkish Land Administration System: Lessons Learned from German Case, XXIII FIG Congress, Germany, October 8-13. Cete, M., 2012, The Need for Re-Engineering in the Turkish Real Estate Valuation System, FIG Working Week 2012, Rome, Italy, 6-10 May. Erdem, N. and Cete, M., 2013, Re-engineering process in the Turkish Real Estate Valuation System and Expectations of the Experts, Union of Chambers of Turkish Engineers and Architects, Chamber of Survey and Cadastre Engineers Congress, Ankara, Turkey. (In Turkish) Ozcelik, N., 2004, Appraisal of Real Estate and Appraisal Practice in Turkey, MSc Thesis, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, 177 pages, İstanbul, Turkey. Yildiz, U., Gunes, T., Guzel, G., Seymen, F., A., 2015, Mass Property Valuation Studies in Turkey (Land Registry And Cadastre Modernization Project) 2015 World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty The World Bank - Washington Dc, March 23-27. Yilmaz, B., E., 2013, Reflections of the Global Economic Crisis on the Countries of Piigs and Turkey s Macroeconomic Variables, Marmara Universities, İ.İ.B. Journal, Vol. XXXIV, No. I, p 229-252. URL_1: http://www.businessdictionary.com, accessed 01/2015. URL_2:http://www.spk.gov.tr, Appraisers Association of Turkey, 2012 Annual Report, http://www.tdub.org.tr/images/pdf/tdub_faaliyet_raporu_2012.pdfaccessed, accessed 02/2015. URL_3: www.woldbank.org.tr, 2008, accessed 01/2015. Sofia, Bulgaria, 17-21 May 2015 7/8

BIOGRAPHICAL NOTES Nuri Erdem graduated from Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey in 1995, and received MSc degrees from Istanbul Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey in 1999. He worked for 3 years as a survey engineer in some private companies. He is now working for Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey as the Head of the Architecture and Urban Planning at the Osmaniye Vocational Schools. His research interests are GNSS, land surveying, application, and real estate appraisal. Mehmet CETE graduated from Geomatics Engineering at Yıldız Technical University, İstanbul, Turkey in 1998, and received MSc and PhD degrees from Geomatics Engineering at Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey in 2002 and 2008. He studied at the Technical University of Munich in 2005-2006 Academic Year as a guest Ph.D. student and visited the Netherlands, Denmark and Switzerland to carry out researches on the land administration systems of those countries. He received his Associate Professor degree in Turkey in 2011. He is now working for Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey as the Head of the Geomatics Engineering Department. His research interests are cadastre, land information system, land readjustment, urban regeneration and real estate appraisal. CONTACTS Lecturer Nuri ERDEM Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye Vocational Schools, Karacaoglan Campus, 80000, Fakıusagi. Osmaniye TURKEY Tel. + 90 328 825 18 18 (ext.5009) Fax + 90 328 825 09 66 Email: nurierdem [at] osmaniye.edu.tr Web site: http://depo.osmaniye.edu.tr/dosyalar/omyo/dosyalar/haritaakademi.pdf Assoc. Prof. Dr. Mehmet CETE Izmir Katip Celebi University, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Geomatics Engineering, 35620, Balatcik, Cigli Izmir TURKEY Tel. +90 232 3293535 (ext. 3716) Fax +90 232 3860888 Email: mehmet.cete@ikc.edu.tr Web site: http://ge.ikc.edu.tr/sayfa/yonetim Sofia, Bulgaria, 17-21 May 2015 8/8