The approved Land Use and Phasing Plans for the Rockcliffe Subdivision are shown below in Figures 1 and 2.

Similar documents
APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT ST. LAURENT BOULEVARD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TIA SCOPING FORM. Prepared for:

Notice of Passing of Zoning By-law Ward6

SK11 PROPOSED 24 UNIT CONDO FLAT - FRONT ELEVATION DONALD STREET RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. December 20, 2012 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PROJECT No.

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

Islington Avenue Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications Final Report

APARTMENT BUILDING 322 GARDNER STREET CITY OF OTTAWA TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW. Prepared for: John Howard Society of Ottawa.

RE: Transportation Overview Youth Services Bureau Housing First Hub for Youth 2887 Riverside Drive

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

All technical references have been provided in the Appendix.

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

PLANNING RATIONALE. Site Conditions and Surrounding Context. June 25, 2013

Authority: Etobicoke York Community Council Item 25.2, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on April 6, 2009 Enacted by Council: April 30, 2009

Financial Impact Statement There are no immediate financial impacts associated with the adoption of this report.

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. AVALON WEST STAGE 4 PLANNING RATIONALE. July Prepared for:

Urban Exceptions 1,201-1,300 (Section 239)

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

Sodded Area. 8.5 m Storm Easement Typ. R12000 FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Policy and Standards for Public Local Residential Streets And Private Streets

Ashcroft Homes Trim Road Development Planning Rationale

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB)

5.0 RESIDENTIAL The permitted uses in the Residential Zone are listed in Table 5.2. Table 5.2 RH R1 R2 R3 R4 RM1

City Avenue District Rezoning. Regional Center Area & Bala Cynwyd Retail District December 14, 2011 Public Hearing

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

Ref. No Task 3. May 31, 2016

Re: 101 and 105 Champagne: Building 2 Parking Requirements Study

General Provisions. 4.1 Accessory Dwelling Units. 4.2 Accessory Uses. Part Residential Zones

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

M:\2016\116063\DATA\APPLICATIONS\SITE PLAN\PLANNING ADDENDUM\PLANNING BRIEF WATERFORD.DOCX.PAGE 1

M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y

RIVER VALE MASTER PLAN PZ CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING JULY 19, 2017 CITY OF BEND

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

2 OVERVIEW & GUIDE. 2.1 ZONING ATLAS OVERVIEW...9 Zoning Districts 9 Transit Areas 10 Pedestrian Streets 10

Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

Planning Justification Report

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

Article Zoning District Regulations

Director, Community Planning, North York District

Article 2. Rules of Interpretation

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE6.1, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on June 10, 11 and 12, 2015 CITY OF TORONTO

SECTION 15 - R3 - RESIDENTIAL THIRD DENSITY ZONE

Urban Exceptions (Section 239)

Urban Exceptions 2,001-3,000

Site Plan Application

KoL at BLACKSTONE. Planning Rationale. April Prepared in support of a Site Plan Control and Draft Plan of Condominium

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd.

CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW NO. ~-20~

Planning and Building Department

PUBLIC NOTICE* Studies Requested: Parking analysis. Other Required Permits: Building Permit, Site Development Permit

Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Decisions/Orders issued June 26, 2014, August 24, 2015 and July 13, 2016 in Board File PL CITY OF TORONTO

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TITUSVILLE, FLORIDA AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING CHAPTER 28 " ZONING",

Residence-3. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2. Residence-2/Patio Home. Residence-2

Wesley Housing Development Corporation Trenton Street Residential

AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF CAMBRIDGE ZONING BY-LAW

Enclosed are amended PUD documents for The Grove at Shoal Creek Proposed by

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

SECTION 9 RESIDENTIAL R5 ZONE

May 21, ACHD Board of Commissioners Stacey Yarrington, Planner II DRH /DRH

Combined Zoning/Minor Variance and Boulevard Parking Agreement Exception

ARTICLE 5.0 SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

LEVAC ROBICHAUD LECLERC Consulting Engineers/Ingénieurs conseils Rockland Hawkesbury Gatineau

Urban Exceptions (Section 239)

Special Provisions. Map 12(4) N/W Dundas Street and Sixth Line. (Block 114, Plan 20M-1114) ( ) ( ) Zone Provisions. Section 8.

New Comprehensive Zoning

Oyster Bay Neighbourhood Concept Plan: Residential

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

5592, 5606, 5630 Boundary Road and Mitch Owens Road. Ottawa, Ontario. Planning Rationale. in support of a. Site Plan Control Application

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS

SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

Holding Provisions General Prohibition Exceptions to Prohibition Holding Provisions

2.2 72ND STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVES

SECTION 10.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES

Residential RM Medium Density Residential. Residential Zones: Minimum Setback: Average of front setbacks on the adjacent lots.

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE33.3, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on June 26, 27 and 28, 2018 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW -2018

SECTION 7 COMMERCIAL ZONES

In support of the previous Plan of Subdivision application, the following studies and reports were previously submitted to the City of Ottawa:

Town of Siler City - Unified Development Ordinance ARTICLE XII - Density and Dimensional Regulations

Division Development Impact Review.

Guidelines for the Approval of New Homes Sales Offices (Building Permits, Agreements, Securities)

Section 7.01 Area Regulations

Section 1: US 19 Overlay District

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

Urban Design Brief. Italian Seniors Project 1090, 1092, 1096 Hamilton Road City of London

Chair and Members of Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel. A0596/16TEY Yonge St New 5 Storey Non-residential Building

Stantec Consulting Ltd. 300W-675 Cochrane Drive, Markham ON L3R 0B8

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

Emma Grand Mixed-use Building 100, 108 & 114 Emma St. South Grand Valley, Ontario

Direct Control District No. 1 (DCD1) for The South Downtown

Rezoning Development Permit Development Variance Permit

and Members of Municipal Council

Transcription:

August, City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Branch Laurier Ave. W., th Floor Ottawa, ON KP J Attention: Mr. Wally Dubyk, C.E.T. Project Manager, Infrastructure Approvals Dear Sir: Reference: Wateridge Village Phase B Blocks,, and Transportation Overview Our File No.: (R--9). INTRODUCTION This Transportation Overview has been prepared in support of a Site Plan Control (C) application for Blocks,, and in Phase B of Wateridge Village at the Rockcliffe Subdivision. The Rockcliffe Subdivision is a Canada Lands Corporation (CLC) development, with the subject blocks developed by Mattamy Homes. As part of the greater approved Plan of Subdivision, a Community Transportation Study was prepared for the Former Canadian Forces Base (CFB) Rockcliffe Redevelopment in June and a Transportation Impact Study was prepared for Phase B of Wateridge Village (formerly CFB Rockcliffe) in October. The site traffic generated by Blocks, and were included in the overall traffic estimates presented in the June CTS and the October TIS. This Overview provides a description of the proposed Site Plan and an updated estimate of the projected site traffic for the weekday AM and PM peak hours. It also provides a review of the on-site design and provisions for non-auto modes of transportation (including possible Transportation Demand Management strategies).. DEVELOPMENT The approved Land Use and Phasing Plans for the Rockcliffe Subdivision are shown below in Figures and. The proposed Site Plans for Blocks,, and are included in Appendix A. Block is.9 hectares (. acres) and is proposed to accommodate rear lane townhouse units. Block is. hectares (. acres) and is proposed to accommodate rear lane townhouse units and stacked townhouse units. Block is. hectares (.9 acres) and is proposed to accommodate rear lane townhouse units and stacked townhouse units. Novatech Page

Figure : Rockcliffe Subdivision Concept Plan Figure : Overall Phasing Plan Novatech Page

The proposed development is bounded by the following: Future Hemlock Road and future residential development to the north; A large future community park to the south and west; Future mixed-use development to the west; and Future elementary school sites to the east. Phase B roads are currently under construction, with Block construction planned to commence in June. Access will initially be provided via Codd s Road and Mikinak Road, with the Wanaki Road connection to Burma Road to be constructed in the near future.. TRANORTATION NETWORK Hemlock Road and Mikinak Road will be collector roads with m right-of-ways, and two-lane urban cross sections. Bump-outs for on-street parking will be provided adjacent to the future mixed-use development to the west of Block, and opposite the future school sites to the east. Raised cycle tracks and sidewalks will be provided on both sides of Hemlock Road. A sidewalk will be provided on the north side of Mikinak Road and a multi-use pathway will be provided on the south side. Michael Stoqua Street, Moses Tennisco Street and Squadron Crescent will be local roads with m right-of-ways and.m paved surfaces. Sidewalks will be provided on both sides of each road. On-site private lanes will generally have paved widths of.m or.m and a.m walkway along one side where possible. A one-way.m private lane is proposed west of the stacked townhouses in Block.. TRIP GENERATION AND DISTRIBUTION Trips generated by the proposed development have been estimated using the residential condominium/townhouse land use code (LU ) identified in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition. The estimated peak hour vehicle trips by the proposed development are outlined in Table below. Table : Trip Generation Land Use ITE Code Units AM Peak PM Peak IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL Residential Condominium / Townhouse The trip generation surveys compiled in the ITE Trip Generation Manual only record vehicle trips, and the sites surveyed are typically located in suburban locations in the United States where non- Novatech Page

auto modes of transportation typically have a modal share of % or less. For urban infill developments where multiple modes of transportation are readily available, it is considered good practice to express projected trip generation volumes in terms of person trips instead of vehicle trips. To convert ITE vehicle trip rates to person trip rates, two adjustment factors have been applied: Vehicle occupancy factor:. (typical North American rate) Non-auto usage factor:. (non-auto trips not counted in ITE surveys, assumed %) Combining the two factors gives an overall vehicle trip to person trip adjustment factor of approximately.. This factor is consistent with the Rockcliffe CTS and the Wateridge Village Phase B TIS. Applying this factor to the vehicle trips projected by the ITE rates yields the following person trip generation: Table : Person Trips Land Use Residential Condominium / Townhouse Peak Hour AM Peak PM Peak. vph = vehicles per hour. pph = persons per hour IN (vph ) OUT (vph) TOTAL (vph) Person Trip Factor x. IN (pph ) OUT (pph) TOTAL (pph) 99 The number of person trips has been categorized by modal share. The modal share values are consistent with the approved Wateridge Village Phase B TIS. A full breakdown of the projected person trips by modal share and arrival/departure is shown in Table below. Table : Site-Generated Person Trips by Modal Share Travel Mode Modal AM Peak PM Peak Share IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL TOTAL PERSON TRIPS 99 Auto Driver % 9 99 Auto Passenger % Transit % 9 9 Non-Motorized % Based on the foregoing, the proposed development is anticipated to generate vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 99 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. Trips generated by the proposed development were included in the overall traffic estimates presented in the Rockcliffe CTS and the Wateridge Village Phase B TIS. The Wateridge Village Phase B TIS identified the following roadway modifications at the Montreal/Wanaki intersection, at full build-out of Phase B: an eastbound protected/permitted left-turn phase, and a westbound right-turn lane. Novatech Page

As indicated in the TIS, the projected increase in vehicle volume at this intersection is mainly related to the future office development (, sq.ft.) located east of Wanaki Road in Phase B. The subject site related traffic for the eastbound left and westbound right turn movements is in the order of % of the Phase B buildout volumes, shown in Figure of the TIS (included in Appendix B for reference). No mitigation measures are recommended to accommodate the proposed development as none are required.. PROVISIONS FOR NON-AUTO MODES Sidewalks and cycling facilities will be provided along Hemlock and Mikinak, the collector roads adjacent to the proposed development. The local roads will have shared travel lanes and sidewalks along both sides. On-site pedestrian walkways will be provided throughout the three blocks of development, as shown on the proposed Site Plans, connecting them with the pedestrian facilities along the adjacent roadways. Walkways will also be provided connecting the stacked townhouse units to the surface parking and mews (north-south pedestrian facilities between the rear lane townhouse units). The proposed number of bicycle parking spaces and minimum requirements identified in the City of Ottawa s Zoning By-law (ZBL) are outlined in Section. below. The nearest OC Transpo bus stops are located at the Montreal/Codd s and Montreal/Burma intersections, a walking distance of approximately km from the site. The Montreal/Codd s bus stops provide service to Routes and 9. The Montreal/Burma bus stops provide service to Route. Routes provides frequent all day service between Blair and downtown; Route 9 provides frequent all-day service between Carson s and the Hurdman Transit Station. A temporary transit route (Route 9 extension) will be provided when at least units are built and occupied in Phase. Route 9 will travel along Codd s Road to Mikinak Road, along Mikinak Road to Wanaki Road, and Wanaki Road back to Montreal Road, with bus stops at the Mikinak/Squadron/Moses Tennisco intersection. The subdivision roads and OC Transpo bus stops will be constructed by CLC.. ON-SITE DESIGN. Proposed Access Block has one private lane connection to Michael Stoqua Street and one connection to Moses Tennisco Street. Block has two private lane connections to Moses Tennisco Street. Block has three private lane connections to the east, south and west on Squadron Crescent. All private lane connections exceed the minimum m spacing from the nearest intersecting street line, as required by the City s Private Approach By-Law. The curb-to-curb width of all private approaches is.m at the property line. The location and spacing of the proposed accesses are compliant with the City s Private Approach By-law. Novatech Page

. On-Site Traffic Control Side street stop control should be provided at the proposed access connections to the adjacent public roadways, with free flow conditions on the public roadways. Side street stop control should also be provided at either end of the north-south private lanes in Block and Block, with stop control at the north end only of the one-way private lane in Block. Stop control should also be provided at the egress of the surface parking for the stacked townhouse units in Block.. On-Site Parking The subject site is located in Area X of Schedule A of the City s Zoning By-Law (ZBL). Minimum parking rates for the proposed development are identified in the ZBL as follows: Townhouse Units o Resident Parking Spaces: Stacked Units o Resident Parking Spaces: o Visitor Parking Spaces: o Bicycle Parking Spaces:. per dwelling unit. per dwelling unit. per dwelling unit. per dwelling unit Based on the foregoing, the ZBL identifies a requirement to provide parking spaces for residents, parking spaces for visitors and bicycle parking spaces for the stacked townhouses in Block. The same number of spaces are required for the stacked townhouses in Block. As shown on the Site Plans, two types of rear lane townhouse units are proposed. The wide units (Type A) will have garages with parking for one and a half vehicles, ie. one standard car and one small car, or one standard car with additional storage space. The narrow units (Type B) will have garages with parking for one vehicle. A total of vehicle parking spaces and bike parking spaces will be provided for the stacked townhouse units in Block. A total of vehicle parking spaces and bike parking spaces will be provided for the stacked townhouse units in Block. The Wateridge Village Phase B Urban Design Guidelines & Architectural Controls recommends the reduction of minimum parking requirements where practical. The proposed reduction in parking for Block will be addressed through a Minor Zoning By-Law Amendment application. The proposed parking for Block is compliant with the minimum requirements identified in the City of Ottawa s ZBL.. Garbage Collection The site is designed for garbage collection through curbside pick-up for the rear lane townhouses, and at the designated on-site waste storage areas for the stacked townhouses. Further discussions with the City are required to confirm if municipal collection can be provided on-site. Novatech Page

. TRANORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT The City of Ottawa has developed a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategy as part of its efforts to reduce automobile dependency. TDM measures can reduce transportation infrastructure requirements by encouraging people to change their travel mode, timing or destination. The Wateridge Village Phase B Urban Design Guidelines & Architectural Controls recommends the provision of preferential parking for bicycles, energy efficient vehicles and car-share services to lessen the reliance on private automobiles. The provision of these measures will be investigated further as part of the detail design process.. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the foregoing, the conclusions and recommendations of this Transportation Overview can be summarized as follows: The proposed development is anticipated to generate vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 99 vehicle trips during the PM peak hour. The site traffic generated by Blocks, and were included in the overall traffic estimates presented in the Former Canadian Forces Base (CFB) Rockcliffe Redevelopment Community Transportation Study (June ) and the Wateridge Village Phase B Transportation Impact Study (October ). No mitigation measures are recommended to accommodate the proposed development as none are required. On-site pedestrian walkways will be provided throughout the three blocks of development, as shown on the proposed Site Plan, connecting them with the pedestrian facilities along the adjacent roadways. Walkways will also be provided connecting the stacked townhouse units to the surface parking and mews (north-south pedestrian facilities between the rear lane townhouse units). A temporary transit route (Route 9 extension) will be provided when at least units are built and occupied in Phase. Route 9 will travel along Codd s Road to Mikinak Road, along Mikinak Road to Wanaki Road, and Wanaki Road back to Montreal Road, with bus stops at the Mikinak/Squadron/Moses Tennisco intersection. The subdivision roads and OC Transpo bus stops will be constructed by CLC. The location and spacing of the proposed accesses are compliant with the City s Private Approach By-law. The Wateridge Village Phase B Urban Design Guidelines & Architectural Controls recommends the reduction of minimum parking requirements where practical. The proposed reduction in parking for Block will be addressed through a Minor Zoning By-Law Amendment application. The proposed parking for Block is compliant with the minimum requirements identified in the City of Ottawa s ZBL. Novatech Page

APPENDIX A Proposed Site Plans

AD RO LOC KR OA MIKINAK Exterior Side Yard..9.. WA LKW AY LAN E C WAL K WAY RO N CRE Exte rior S SCE ide NT Yar R K CRESCENT BLOCK BLOCK BLOC d,. m RY[] BLOCK. BLOCK. BLOCK. BLOCK. BLOCK. BLOCK. BLOCK 9. BLOCK. BLOCK 9. BLOCK.9 BLOCK 9. BLOCK 9. BLOCK.9 BLOCK.9 BLOCK. BLOCK. BLOCK. # BLOCK. BLOCK 9.9 BLOCK. BLOCK. BLOCK. ZONE PROVISION - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT A (Table) (iv) MIN. LOT WIDTH (m). 9.. 9. 9 9 CURB DEPRESSED CURB PROJECTION (BALCONY/PORCH) PROJECTION (STAIRS) FIRE HYDRANT DWELLING ENTRANCE A (Table) (vii) MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (m) m. m A (Table) (viii) MIN. CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK (m) m. m A (Table) (ix) MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (m) m. m. m TYPE A ( @./unit). 9 TYPE B ( @./unit). VISITOR PARKING ( @./unit). (Table) () MIN.WIDTH OF PRIVATE WAY m. m (Table) () SETBACK OF ANY WALL OF A MIN.RES. BUILDING TO PRIVATE WAY MIN. SETBACK OF GARAGE DOOR TO PRIVATE WAY. m. m. m. m MIN. LOT WIDTH (m) - TYPE A TOWNHOUSE m. m TYPE B TOWNHOUSE m. m MIN. LOT AREA (m) - TYPE A m.9m TYPE B m. m m. m MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (m) () MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (m) m. m () MIN. CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK (m) m m () MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (m) m. m () MIN. INTERIOR YARD SETBACK (m). m. m TYPE A./unit./unit TYPE B./unit /unit./unit () BLOCK (Mew) BOUNDARY Aug, Issue for Site Plan Control Submission Aug, Issue for Canada Lands Company review July, Draft for review DATE REVISION BY. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR PRINT.. THIS DRAWING IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF KORSIAK URBAN PLANNING AND MATTAMY HOMES. COPYRIGHT RESERVED.. SITE PLAN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN M-AND PLAN R-9, PREPARED BY ANNIS O'SULLIVAN, VOLLEBEKK LTD.. TOWNHOUSE DWELLING UNITS ARE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE CURBSIDE GARBAGE PICK-UP.. MEWS ARE INTENDED FOR PUBLIC ACCESS.. ONE () TYPE A (. x. m) AND TYPE B (. x. m) BARRIER-FREE PARKING ACE ARE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO A. m WIDE AISLE.. WALKWAYS AND CURBS TO BE TIED INTO PUBLIC ROW WHERE APPLICABLE. PROJECT TEAM SITE PLAN DESIGN: TRANORTATION: Corner sight triangle ENVIRONMENTAL: xm NOISE: CIVIL ENGINEER: GEOTECHNICAL & STRUCTURAL: Eaves, eave-troughs, gutters m () Sills, belt courses, cornices, parapets, pilasters. m () Canopies, awnings. m () Fire escapes, open stairways, stoop >.m to lot line. m () Covered or uncovered balcony, porch, deck m m () Bay window m () Air conditioner condenser, heat pump m ()(b) Min. shared driveway width m ()(a) Min. perpendicular parking space size. x. m ()(b) Min. parallel parking space size. x. m ()(a)(i) Min. driveway width to parking lot. m (Table) Min. aisle width to spaces. m () Min. driveway width to garage. m. m 9()(b) Max. walkway width permitted in yard. m. m () Min. % of parking lot area landscaped % (Table) Min. landscape buffer width parking lot to lot line. m ()(b) Min. waste collection setback to lot line m WATERIDGE VILLAGE: PHASE B ST. LAURENT BLVD. PART OF LOTS, AND CONCESSION (OTTAWA FRONT) GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER AND BLOCKS -, AND REGISTERED PLAN M-9 CITY OF OTTAWA TITLE: BLOCK SITE PLAN DATE: JOB NO.: 9. 9 MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICAL: ARCHITECTURE: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS () LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: PLANNING: Permitted projections into req. yards.9 [D.M.Y] GENERAL NOTES () LOT BOUNDARY BLOCK BOUNDARY VISITOR PARKING RAISED CONCRETE DECK TYPE B TOWNHOUSE (.m). m LANDSCAPED AREA TYPE A TOWNHOUSE (.m) m ZONE PROVISION - TOWNHOUSE UNIT NUMBER BENCH 9, m. 9 RIVERSTONE, m MIN. INTERIOR YARD SETBACK (m) LR OA D CROSSWALK A (Table) (vi) MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (m) NT RE A CONCRETE SIDEWALK A (Table) (v) MIN. LOT AREA (m) MO LEGEND RESIDENT PARKING - SITE SCALE : (Table) () HEMLOCK ROAD UNITS DWELLING TYPE (Table) GROUND FLOOR AREA (m) DWELLING BLOCK (Table) AD BLAIR ROAD,9. m RESIDENT PARKING - RO CODD'S ROAD TYPE B ( @ 9.m).,. m ZONE CATEGORY (Table) CK MONTREAL ROAD TYPE A ( @.m ). A (Table) (x) LO DENSITY (UPH) (Table) CODD'S ROAD TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA 9. 9.. 9..9 9 9,. m (%) 9 TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE,9.9 m (%) ().9 LANDSCAPED AREA () K BLOC AD STORMWATER POND.m R.9 SQU. CK BLO.9 TE VA PRI R. CK 9.9 BLO BLOCK 9 m R.9 R R K OC BL HEM TOTAL FUTURE RESIDENTIAL SQUADRON BLOCK BLOCK PRIVATE LANE B,. m (%).9.9.m WALKWAY BLOCK BLOCK. PRIVATE LANE E BLOCK.9 9. BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK PRIVATE LANE D BLOCK.m WALKWAY BLOCK.m WALKWAY R R.9.9.m WALKWAY. Front Yard CRESCENT SQUADRON PARK R.9.m WALKWAY. R R 9..9 PRIVATE LANE A BLOCK Rear Yard BLOCK BLOCK. BLOCK.9 PAVED AREA ROAD 9,. m AVIATION PKWY FRENCH PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE AREA BLAIR ROAD CO DD 'S HEM D FUTURE RESIDENTIAL S:\Korsiak & Company\MATTAMY\Ottawa\Wateridge\Site Plan Template\Block site plan-aug_sp.dwg Y IA AV SITE STATISTICS AND DEVELOPMENT DATA W PK N TIO BLAIR ROAD KEY MAP N.T.S. August, DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: Mattamy - Wateridge CR DRAWING NO. A

KEY MAP N.T.S. AVIATION PKWY HEMLOCK ROAD MONTREAL ROAD CODD'S ROAD SITE BLAIR ROAD BLAIR ROAD HEMLOCK ROAD HEMLOCK ROAD AVIATION PKWY CODD'S ROAD MONTREAL ROAD BLAIR ROAD SCALE : LEGEND... SITE STATISTICS AND DEVELOPMENT DATA CONCRETE SIDEWALK CROSSWALK RIVERSTONE CURB SITE AREA,9.9 m DEPRESSED CURB S:\Korsiak & Company\MATTAMY\Ottawa\Wateridge\Site Plan Template\Block site plan-aug.dwg FUTURE RESIDENTIAL MICHAEL STOQUA STREET.9.9..m WALKWAY BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK PRIVATE LANE A.m WALKWAY 9. FUTURE RESIDENTIAL.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY.m fence.m on private property; to be provided by others.9 R R. BLOCK..9.9 MOSES TENNISCO STREET FUTURE RESIDENTIAL PAVED AREA LANDSCAPED AREA TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA TYPE A TOWNHOUSE ( @. m ) TYPE B TOWNHOUSE ( @ 9. m ) STACKED TOWNS ( @ 9 m ; @ m ) DENSITY (UPH) ZONE CATEGORY DWELLING BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK () () () () () () () (Table) (Table) (9) () () () () () () () (Table) (Table) A (Table) () () () () () () () () ()(b) ()(a) ()(b) ()(a)(i) (Table) () 9()(b) () (Table) ()(b) DWELLING TYPE STACKED TOWNS STACKED TOWNS ZONE PROVISION - TOWNHOUSE ZONE PROVISION - STACKED TOWNS MIN. LANDSCAPING (% of lot) MIN. LOT WIDTH (m) MIN. LOT AREA (m ) MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (m) MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. INTERIOR YARD SETBACK (m) RESIDENT PARKING ( @./unit) VISITOR PARKING ( @./unit) BICYCLE PARKING ( @./unit),. m (%),. m (%),. m (9%),. m. RY[]....,. m 9. m, m GROUND FLOOR AREA (m) MIN. LOT WIDTH (m) - TYPE A TOWNHOUSE MIN. LOT AREA (m ) - TYPE A TYPE B TOWNHOUSE TYPE B MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (m) MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. INTERIOR YARD SETBACK (m) RESIDENT PARKING - VISITOR PARKING ( @./unit) ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS Corner sight triangle Permitted projections into req. yards Eaves, eave-troughs, gutters TYPE A ( @./unit) TYPE B ( @./unit) Sills, belt courses, cornices, parapets, pilasters Canopies, awnings Fire escapes, open stairways, stoop Covered or uncovered balcony, porch, deck Bay window Air conditioner condenser, heat pump Min. shared driveway width Min. perpendicular parking space size Min. parallel parking space size Min. driveway width to parking lot Min. aisle width to spaces Min. driveway width to garage Max. walkway width permitted in yard Min. % of parking lot area landscaped Min. landscape buffer width parking lot to lot line Min. waste collection setback to lot line % m m m m m. m m./unit (). UNITS TOTAL 9 m m m m m m m m. m./unit (.)./unit (.). m. m. m >.m to lot line m m m m. x. m. x. m. m. m. m. m %. m m. m. m.9m. m. m. m. m. m. m./unit (9) /unit () % 9.9 m 9. m. m m. m. m./unit () x m. m m. x. m. m. m. m. m m m Aug, Aug, July, DATE GENERAL NOTES. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR PRINT.. THIS DRAWING IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF KORSIAK URBAN PLANNING AND MATTAMY HOMES. COPYRIGHT RESERVED.. SITE PLAN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN M-AND PLAN R-9, PREPARED BY ANNIS O'SULLIVAN, VOLLEBEKK LTD.. TOWNHOUSE DWELLING UNITS ARE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE CURBSIDE GARBAGE PICK-UP.. ONE () TYPE A (. x. m) AND TYPE B (. x. m) BARRIER-FREE PARKING ACE ARE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO A. m WIDE AISLE.. WALKWAYS AND CURBS TO BE TIED INTO PUBLIC ROW WHERE APPLICABLE. PROJECT TEAM SITE PLAN DESIGN: PLANNING: ARCHITECTURE: CIVIL ENGINEER: TITLE: DATE: JOB NO.: # [D.M.Y] REVISION August, PROJECTION (BALCONY/PORCH/TERRACE) PROJECTION (STAIRS) MOLOK WASTE STORAGE FIRE HYDRANT BICYCLE PARKING BARRIER FREE PARKING DWELLING ENTRANCE UNIT NUMBER LANDSCAPED AREA RAISED CONCRETE DECK PAINTED LINES TYPE A TOWNHOUSE (.m) TYPE B TOWNHOUSE (.m) STACKED DWELLING LOT BOUNDARY BLOCK BOUNDARY BLOCK (Mew) BOUNDARY FENCE Issue for Site Plan Control Submission Issue for Canada Lands Company review Draft for review LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: TRANORTATION: NOISE: GEOTECHNICAL & STRUCTURAL: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: Mattamy - Wateridge CR BY MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICAL: ENVIRONMENTAL: WATERIDGE VILLAGE: PHASE B ST. LAURENT BLVD. PART OF LOTS, AND CONCESSION (OTTAWA FRONT) GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER AND BLOCKS -, AND REGISTERED PLAN M-9 CITY OF OTTAWA BLOCK SITE PLAN DRAWING NO. A

HEMLOCK ROAD Front Yard SITE STATISTICS AND DEVELOPMENT DATA SITE AREA PAVED AREA,.9 m,.9 m (.%) KEY MAP N.T.S. AVIATION PKWY HEMLOCK ROAD MONTREAL ROAD CODD'S ROAD CODD'S ROAD HEMLOCK ROAD SITE BLAIR ROAD BLAIR ROAD HEMLOCK ROAD.9...m WALKWAY BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK.m fence.m on private property; to be provided by others LANDSCAPED AREA TOTAL BUILDING COVERAGE TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA TOWNHOUSE TYPE A ( @.m ) TOWNHOUSE TYPE B ( @ 9.m ) STACKED ( @ 9 m ) STACKED ( @ m ) DENSITY (UPH) ZONE CATEGORY DWELLING BLOCK BLOCK DWELLING TYPE,. m (.%),. m (.%),. m.,. m,. m, m, m RY[] GROUND FLOOR AREA (m). UNITS AVIATION PKWY SCALE : CODD'S ROAD LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK CROSSWALK RIVERSTONE BLAIR ROAD MONTREAL ROAD S:\Korsiak & Company\MATTAMY\Ottawa\Wateridge\Site Plan Template\Block site plan-aug_sp.dwg to PARKING ACES FUTURE RESIDENTIAL FUTURE RESIDENTIAL MOSES TENNISCO STREET Exterior Side Yard.9.9.9.99. PRIVATE LANE C PRIVATE LANE B MIKINAK PRIVATE LANE A.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY BLOCK.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY.9 BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY.9 R. R..m WALKWAY PRIVATE LANE D ROAD PARKING AISLE (ONE WAY) à.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK 9 BLOCK..9.9 R. R..9 Rear Yard R. R R. R. R. BLOCK BLOCK.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY.m WALKWAY Interior Side Yard.99 FRENCH PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK 9 BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK BLOCK A (Table) (iv) A (Table) (v) A (Table) (vi) A (Table) (vii) A (Table) (viii) A (Table) (ix) A (Table) (x) (Table) (Table) (Table) () (Table) () (Table) () A (Table) () () () () () () () (Table) (Table) () () () () () () () () ()(b) ()(a) ()(b) ()(a)(i) (Table) () 9()(b) () (Table) ()(b) STACKED TOWNS STACKED TOWNS ZONE PROVISION - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT MIN. LOT WIDTH (m) MIN. LOT AREA (m) MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (m) MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. INTERIOR YARD SETBACK (m) RESIDENT PARKING -.....9..... 9...9 TYPE A ( @./unit) TYPE B ( @./unit) STACKED ( @./unit) VISITOR PARKING (9 @./unit) MIN.WIDTH OF PRIVATE WAY SETBACK OF ANY WALL OF A MIN. RES. BUILDING TO PRIVATE WAY MIN. SETBACK OF GARAGE DOOR TO PRIVATE WAY BICYCLE PARKING (STACKS) ZONE PROVISION - TOWNHOUSE MIN. LOT WIDTH (m) - TYPE A TOWNHOUSE MIN. LOT AREA (m) - TYPE A TYPE B TOWNHOUSE TYPE B MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (m) MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. CORNER SIDE YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK (m) MIN. INTERIOR YARD SETBACK (m) RESIDENT PARKING - VISITOR PARKING ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS Corner sight triangle TYPE A TYPE B Permitted projections into req. yards Eaves, eave-troughs, gutters Sills, belt courses, cornices, parapets, pilasters Canopies, awnings Fire escapes, open stairways, stoop Covered or uncovered balcony, porch, deck Bay window Air conditioner condenser, heat pump Min. shared driveway width Min. perpendicular parking space size Min. parallel parking space size Min. driveway width to parking lot Min. aisle width to spaces - 9 degrees Min. driveway width to garage degrees Max. walkway width permitted in yard Min. % of parking lot area landscaped Min. landscape buffer width parking lot to lot line Min. waste collection setback to lot line TOTAL 9, m m m m m. m...9 m. m../unit () m m m m m m m m. m./unit./unit./unit m. m. m >.m to lot line m m m m. x. m. x. m. m. m. m. m. m %. m m, m. m. m. m. m m.. m. m. m. m. m.9m. m. m. m. m. m. m./unit /unit x m. m m. x. m. x. m. m. m. m. m m m Aug, Aug, July, DATE TITLE: DATE: WATERIDGE VILLAGE: PHASE B JOB NO.: # [D.M.Y] GENERAL NOTES CURB DEPRESSED CURB PROJECTION (BALCONY/PORCH/TERRACE) PROJECTION (STAIRS) MOLOK WASTE STORAGE FIRE HYDRANT BICYCLE PARKING BARRIER FREE PARKING DWELLING ENTRANCE UNIT NUMBER LANDSCAPED AREA RAISED CONCRETE DECK PAINTED LINES TYPE A TOWNHOUSE (.m) TYPE B TOWNHOUSE (.m) STACKED DWELLING LOT BOUNDARY BLOCK BOUNDARY BLOCK (Mew) BOUNDARY FENCE Draft for review REVISION ST. LAURENT BLVD. PART OF LOTS, AND CONCESSION (OTTAWA FRONT) GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER AND BLOCKS -, AND REGISTERED PLAN M-9 CITY OF OTTAWA BLOCK SITE PLAN August, DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: Mattamy - Wateridge CR BY. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS FOR PRINT.. THIS DRAWING IS THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF KORSIAK URBAN PLANNING AND MATTAMY HOMES. COPYRIGHT RESERVED.. SITE PLAN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLAN M-AND PLAN R-9, PREPARED BY ANNIS O'SULLIVAN, VOLLEBEKK LTD.. TOWNHOUSE DWELLING UNITS ARE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE CURBSIDE GARBAGE PICK-UP.. MEWS ARE INTENDED FOR PUBLIC ACCESS.. ONE () TYPE A (. x. m) AND TYPE B (. x. m) BARRIER-FREE PARKING ACE ARE PROVIDED ADJACENT TO A. m WIDE AISLE.. WALKWAYS AND CURBS TO BE TIED INTO PUBLIC ROW WHERE APPLICABLE. PROJECT TEAM SITE PLAN DESIGN: PLANNING: ARCHITECTURE: CIVIL ENGINEER: Issue for Site Plan Control Submission Issue for Canada Lands Company review LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE: TRANORTATION: NOISE: GEOTECHNICAL & STRUCTURAL: MECHANICAL/ ELECTRICAL: ENVIRONMENTAL: DRAWING NO. A

APPENDIX B Wateridge Village Phase B TIS Excerpt

. VEHICLE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT Traffic distribution was based on the existing volume splits at study area intersections, our knowledge of the surrounding area, and the Phase distribution outlined in the Former CFB Rockcliffe Redevelopment CTS. The proposed access/egress to/from Phase B of the development will be provided via Codd s Road and Wanaki Road only. No site access is proposed via Hemlock Road for Phase B. As such, the Phase B distribution is as follows: % to/from the west via Montreal Road, Rockcliffe Parkway, and Hemlock Road; % to/from the south via Blair Road, Aviation Parkway, and Bathgate Drive; and % to/from the east via Montreal Road. Based on these distributions, Phase B new and pass-by site-generated trips are assigned to study area intersections, which are illustrated as Figure. Figure : New and Pass-by Site-Generated Traffic Volumes SITE () () () () 9(9) () 9() Carsons Codd's Montreal () 9() () () () 9() () Bathgate Wanaki Blair () (9) (9) () () (9) () (9) () xx (yy) AM Peak Hour Volumes PM Peak Hour Volumes. FUTURE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS. PROJECTED CONDITIONS AT FULL SITE DEVELOPMENT The total projected volumes associated with the build-out of the proposed redevelopment were derived by superimposing new and pass-by site-generated traffic volumes (Figure ) onto existing traffic volumes (Figure ). The resulting total projected traffic volumes are illustrated as Figure 9. Wateridge Phase B Transportation Impact Study