EXPLANATION OF COLUMN HEADINGS

Similar documents
Status of Local PACE Programs

EXPLANATION OF COLUMN HEADINGS

FARMLAND INFORMATION CENTER

Status of State PACE Programs

STATUS OF STATE PACE PROGRAMS

January 2018 longandfoster.com

AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM AGRICULTURAL LAND EASEMENTS

TDR STUDY 2002 You have been selected to participate in an important study of TDR programs. The study will shed light on the status of TDR programs

State Housing Trust Fund Revenues 2017

A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: HOW PROGRAMS SELECT FARMLAND TO FUND REPORT 2

THE 2006 VIRGINIA ASSESSMENT/SALES RATIO STUDY

Virginia. Real Estate and Rental and Leasing Profile

NCSL TABLE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAXES

A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: MEASURING SUCCESS IN PROTECTING FARMLAND REPORT 4

Keeping Our Commitment

Protecting Farmland in Maryland: A Review of the Agricultural Land Preservation Program

City Housing Trust Fund Revenues 2018

State Incentive-Based Growth Management Laws

What is Farmland Preservation?

APPENDIX A: Overview: Overview

What is Proper Tax Policy for Smokeless Tobacco Products?

Business Creation Index

State Tax Credits for Historic Preservation A State-by-State Summary. States with income tax incentives States that do not tax income

A NATIONAL VIEW OF AGRICULTURAL EASEMENT PROGRAMS: EASEMENTS AND LOCAL PLANNING REPORT 3

2016 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) in Practice

June Published by the Virginia REALTORS Data recorded July 20,

General Development Plan Background Report on Agricultural Land Preservation

Virginia HOME SALES REPORT NOVEMBER 2017

CBRE INDUSTRIAL & LOGISTICS SPECIAL PROPERTIES GROUP

The Honorable Larry Hogan And The General Assembly of Maryland

The Subject Section. Chapter 2. Property Address

Introduction to Conservation Easements. Blair Calvert Fitzsimons Chief Executive Officer

What Is Proper Tax Policy for Smokeless Tobacco Products?

Virginia HOME SALES REPORT JULY Published by the Virginia REALTORS, the advocate for real estate professionals and property owners in Virginia.

Virginia AUGUST 2018

2018 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

Virginia HOME SALES REPORT MAY Published by the Virginia REALTORS, the advocate for real estate professionals and property owners in Virginia.

The Prettyboy Watershed: Financing Land Conservation The Trust for Public Land: November 2002 PRETTYBOY WATERSHED LAND CONSERVATION FUNDING OPTIONS

Homeownership Affordable in Virginia. C. Theodore Koebel, Ph.D. Virginia Center for Housing Research Virginia Tech

SPECIAL PROPERTIES GROUP INDUSTRIAL SERVICES

VIRGINIA. Home SAleS RepoRt QUARTER

Paper for presentation at the 2005 AAEA annual meeting Providence, RI July 24-27, 2005

Appendix J Agricultural Land Preservation in Other States

April 12, The Honorable Martin O Malley And The General Assembly of Maryland

PURCHASE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAMS IN THE U.S.

Your Guide to Real Estate Customs by State

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE

Preserving Working Landscapes. LTA Rally October 2006 Nashville, Tennessee

Foreclosures and Bank-Owned Homes: More Challenges Ahead

Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Fund

- Farm Transfers - Real World Examples

LEGISLATIVE PURPOSES. 2. Provide sources of agricultural products within the state for the citizens of the state

TO: Rural Development State Directors

No Land, No Water: Solutions and Programs for Mitigating Land Loss

PROTECTING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED. C. Ronald Franks Audrey Scott

Your Guide to. Real Estate. Customs by State

PANEL ON FARMLAND PRESERVATION IN THE MIDWEST

MULTIFAMILY TAX SUBSIDY PROJECT INCOME LIMITS

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

NRCS Conservation Programs

Special Consideration Multiple jurisdictions is cumbersome

Presented on behalf of The Morris Land Trust September 11, 2009 By Melissa Spear Connecticut Conservation Practitioners, LLC

An Assessment and Recommendations for Preservation and Management of City-owned Agricultural Land

IC Chapter 7. Real Property Transactions

No Survey Required w/ Survey. Affidavit. Affidavit. Affidavit

ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Lending and Banking Law January 29-31, 2009 Scottsdale, Arizona

Marin County Agricultural Land Conservation Program March 1, 2014

FARMLAND AMENITY PROTECTION. A Brief Guide To Conservation Easements

National Legislative Program Evaluation Society September 19, Pennsylvania Legislative Budget and Finance Committee

AVAILABLE SPACE UNION TRUST BUILDING

Land Preservation in the Highlands Region

Community Associations & Maryland's New Stormwater Fees

p URCHASE of development rights

RESEARCH BRIEF. Oct. 31, 2012 Volume 2, Issue 3

Understanding Whom the LIHTC Program Serves

Alabama. Alaska. Arizona. Arkansas. California. Colorado

Twenty-Four Years of Farmland Preservation in Michigan, PA 116. Kurt J. Norgaard. Ph. D. Extension Land Use Specialist

PROPERTY FORECLOSURES IN MARYLAND FOURTH QUARTER 2014

Summary of State Manufactured Home Purchase Opportunity Laws

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

I. The Affordability Problem in Boston II. What is Affordable? III.Housing Costs IV.Housing Production V. What Can Public Policy Do? I.

Conservation Easement Assistance Program

Remains eligible for state or federal farm programs. Can use land as collateral for loans. Can reserve home lots for children

Virginia Home Sales 2017

2011 ASSESSMENT RATIO REPORT

Torch Lake Township Antrim County, Michigan

AVAILABLE SPACE 4 MOST PROFESSIONAL PARK

A MODEL PURCHASE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (PDR) PROGRAM FOR VIRGINIA. Part 1: Suggested components of Local PDR Programs (June 2004)

Innovative Local Government Land Conservation Techniques

Medicaid Prescription Reimbursement Information by State Quarter Ending June 2010

VERMONT S RENTAL HOUSING AFFORDABILITY GAP CONTINUES TO GROW The Average Vermont Renter Can t Afford a Modest 2-Bedroom Apartment

More details >>> HERE <<<

The Homebuyer s Guide to Community Land Trusts

Tools for Conservation: Land Trusts & Easements

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AGENDA ITEM

H.K.Bentley, APPRAISERS MARYLAND VIRGINIA DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WEST VIRGINIA DELAWARE NEVADA NATIONALLY THROUGH OUR SISTER COMPANY, BENTLEY NATIONAL

Local Agriculture Perspectives in the Middle Rio Grande Valley

Automatic Renewal Laws in All 50 States Index

Development and Updates of Protected Lands Databases in the US (PAD-US, NCED, CARL)

Transcription:

American farmland trust Farmland information center FARMLAND INFORMATION CENTER FACT SHEET STATUS OF LOCAL PACE PROGRAMS (800) 370-4879 www.farmlandinfo.org DESCRIPTION As of January 2011, at least 90 independently funded, local purchase of agricultural conservation easement (PACE) programs in 20 states had acquired funding and/or easements. This table displays the status and summarizes important information about these local farm and ranch land protection programs. For a program to be included, the protection of agricultural lands must be one of its core purposes, accomplished primarily by compensating landowners for the value of the easement. EXPLANATION OF COLUMN HEADINGS Locality Name of the locality the program serves. When a land trust or soil and water conservation district administers the program, it is listed next to the locality. Year of Inception / Year of First Acquisition Year of Inception is the year in which the ordinance creating the PACE program was passed. Year of First Acquisition is the year in which the program acquired its first easement. Easements / Number of agricultural conservation easements or conservation restrictions acquired to date. This number includes joint projects with state and/or county programs and independent projects completed by the local program. This number does not necessarily reflect the total number of farms/ranches protected. Number of acres protected by the program through independent and joint projects to date. Easements / Number of agricultural conservation easements or conservation restrictions acquired through independent projects to date. This number excludes easements/restrictions acquired through joint projects with county and/or state programs, which may represent the majority of local activity, to avoid double counting easements acquired. This number does not necessarily reflect the total number of farms/ranches protected. Number of acres protected through independent projects. This number excludes acres protected through joint projects with county and/or state programs, which may represent the majority of local activity, to avoid double counting protected acres. Program Funds Spent to Date Dollars spent by each program to acquire easements/restrictions on farms/ranches through independent projects. This number excludes dollars spent on joint projects with county and/or state programs. Amounts may include unspent funds that are encumbered for installment payments on completed projects. Unless otherwise noted, this figure does not include incidental land acquisition costs such as appraisals, insurance and recording fees or the administrative cost of running the program. These figures do not include additional funds contributed by federal programs, other localities, private land trusts, foundations and/or individuals. Additional Funds Spent to Date Funds contributed by federal programs, other localities, state governments, private land trusts, foundations and/or individuals on (see Funding Sources Used to Date below). Program Funds Available Program funds available for the current fiscal year to acquire easements on agricultural land. Outstanding Applications Backlog of applications reported by program administrators. Funding Sources Used to Date Sources of funding for independent projects. Transportation funding refers to federal money disbursed under The Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005 and its predecessors for transportation enhancements. Easement acquisitions that protect scenic views and historic sites along transportation routes are eligible for these funds. (continued on page 6) September 2011 (revised 2012) The (FIC) is a clearinghouse for information about farmland protection and stewardship. The FIC is a public /private partnership between the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and American Farmland Trust.

Purchase of Agricultural Conservation Easements Locality California Year of Inception/ Year of First Acquisition Program Funds Spent to Date Davis, City of 1988/1988 14 2,969 6 503 $2,419,000 ^ Sonoma Co. 1990/1992 78 34,746 78 34,746 $81,668,250 Colorado Boulder, City of ~ (2010) 1967/1984 17 2,438 17 2,438 $21,399,732 ^ Douglas Co. 1994/1995 22 38,826 10 13,946 $16,808,152 ^ Routt Co. 1996/2000 34 21,816 11 6,692 $4,515,332 ^ Connecticut Shelton, Town of 1996/1998 8 395 2 5 $2 Tolland, Town of 2006/2006 1 155 1 155 $365,000 Florida Broward Co. X 2000/2000 5 64 5 64 $7,853,997 Indian River Co. 2004/2007 3 2,047 3 2,047 $23,256,728 Pasco Co. 2005/2009 1 384 1 384 $1,800,000 Sarasota Co. 1999/2002 5 17,167 2 2,134 $7,329,801 ^ Volusia Co. 2000/2003 6 3,905 1 163 $1,165,173 ^ Illinois Kane Co. ~ (2009) 2001/2002 34 4,655 34 4,655 $18,053,800 Kentucky Lexington-Fayette Co. 2000/2002 228 25,424 228 25,424 $28,072,719 Maryland Anne Arundel Co. 1991/1992 123 12,107 52 5,907 $40,930,000 Baltimore Co. 1979/1981 356 35,298 45 4,549 $12,921,237 Calvert Co. ~ (2010) 1992/1993 141 12,165 91 5,881 N/A Carroll Co. ~ (2010) 1979/1980 506 56,540 113 11,251 $96,169,497 ^ Frederick Co. 1991/1993 335 46,726 112 16,629 $41,743,261 ^ Harford Co. 1977/1977 370 42,326 224 27,257 $99,305,910 Howard Co. 1978/1984 174 17,899 135 13,858 $208,276,000 Montgomery Co. 1986/1989 120 17,524 68 8,081 $30,377,853 ^ Prince George's Co. - Soil Conservation District 2007/2008 28 2,675 13 1,296 $10,571,759 Washington Co. 1980/1981 129 25,076 13 1,329 $7,271,656 ^ Wicomico Co. 1986/2004 63 8,439 8 790 $1,619,027 Michigan Acme Township - Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy 2004/2009 3 220 3 220 $1,070,928 Kent Co. 2002/2005 12 1,486 10 1,252 $275,000 ^ Peninsula Township 1994/1996 75 4,783 55 3,065 $15,173,800 Minnesota Dakota Co. 2003/2005 30 3,680 30 3,680 $6,566,329 Montana Gallatin Co. ~ (2008) 2000/2000 22 29,694 21 29,107 $9,300,000 ^ New Hampshire Londonderry, Town of 1996/1996 40 786 20 372 $13,029,600 ^ New Jersey Burlington Co. 1985/1985 178 25,214 4 500 $4,738,609 Cape May Co. 1989/1991 57 3,045 14 517 $18,978,678 Gloucester Co. 2000/1989 215 13,000 70 3,000 $38,200,000 2 Monmouth Co. 1981/1987 175 12,912 4 161 $1,934,688 Morris Co. 1983/1996 113 7,156 16 491 $5,093,204 New York East Hampton, Town of 1982/1982 19 360 16 211 N/A Pittsford, Town of X 1995/1996 9 1,060 7 653 $6,259,248 ^ Southampton, Town of 1998/1999 38 961 32 828 $104,564,296 ^ Southold, Town of 1984/1986 106 2,204 86 1,748 $38,105,771 Suffolk Co. + 1974/1976 338 9,895 311 8,934 $211,600,000 NOTE: For explanation of column headings and symbols, please see fact sheet text.

Status of Selected Local Programs as of January 2011 Additional Funds Spent to Date Program Funds Available Outstanding Applications Funding Sources Used to Date California Appropriations, mitigation fees, local government contributions, $5,297,000 N/A N/A property tax revenue, FRPP $21,824,400 $3,500,000 3 Bonds, local government contributions, sales tax, FRPP Colorado N/A N/A N/A Bonds, private contributions, sales tax $1,829,848 N/A 0 Bonds, private contributions, sales and use tax $6,537,833 $2,226,260 6 Property tax revenue Connecticut $3,425,524 $0 1 Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, FRPP $365,000 $1,334,918 0 Bonds, FRPP Florida $0 $0 0 Bonds $0 $300,000 1 Bonds, property tax revenue $0 $3,500,000 0 Sales tax N/A $250,000 0 Bonds, local government contributions, property tax revenue $0 N/A N/A Property tax revenue Illinois $8,803,142 $2,800,000 15 Gaming revenue, FRPP Kentucky Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, $33,522,632 N/A 37 state tobacco settlement funding, FRPP Maryland Agricultural transfer tax, appropriations, bonds, $400,000 $1,000,000 N/A local government contributions, FRPP Agricultural transfer tax, appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, N/A $1,800,000 30 private contributions, real estate transfer tax, transportation funding, FRPP Agricultural transfer tax, appropriations, private contributions, $0 N/A N/A property tax revenue, recording fees, transportation funding, FRPP Agricultural transfer tax, appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, $2,782,842 N/A N/A property tax revenue, FRPP Agricultural transfer tax, appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, $1,316,500 $6,248,003 46 property tax revenue, recording fees, FRPP, federal transportation funding N/A N/A 25 Agricultural transfer tax, local government contributions, real estate transfer tax, FRPP Agricultural transfer tax, bonds, real estate transfer tax, use value assessment N/A $28,374,000 3 withdrawal penalties, FRPP Agricultural transfer tax, appropriations, bonds, investment income, N/A $6,300,000 18 local government contributions, real estate transfer tax, FRPP N/A $3,000,000 40 Local government contributions, real estate transfer tax Agricultural transfer tax, appropriations, local government contributions, private N/A $1,211,204 N/A contributions, real estate transfer tax, recording fees, transportation funding, FRPP $515,331 $3,800 0 Local government contributions, real estate transfer tax, FRPP Michigan $356,976 $1,752,408 3 Private contributions, property tax revenue, FRPP N/A $418,786 35 FRPP $2,571,950 N/A 15 $10,269,333 $2,460,000 15 $6,315,000 N/A N/A $1,000,000 $1,119,112 20 Appropriations, bonds, private contributions, property tax revenue, transportation funding, FRPP Bonds, landfill fees, local government contributions, property tax revenue, FRPP Appropriations, bonds, private contributions, property tax revenue, FRPP Appropriations, bonds, use value assessment withdrawal penalty, property tax revenue N/A N/A N/A Bonds, property tax revenue $0 $290,100 4 Property tax revenue, transient lodging tax Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions $0 $21,000,000 60 property tax revenue, FRPP Appropriations, local government contributions $267,691 $14,600,000 25 property tax revenue, FRPP $295,000 $36,762,596 7 Bonds, property tax revenue N/A N/A N/A Bonds, real estate transfer tax N/A $0 0 Appropriations, bonds, FRPP $0 $0 6 Bonds, real estate transfer tax $2,608,305 $14,300,000 N/A Bonds, private contributions, real estate transfer tax, FRPP $53,800,000 N/A 15 Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, sales tax, FRPP Minnesota Montana New Hampshire New Jersey New York 3

Purchase of Agricultural Conservation Easements Locality New York (continued) Year of Inception/ Year of First Acquisition Program Funds Spent to Date Warwick, Town of 2001/1997 17 2,435 11 1,330 $3,950,138 ^ Watershed Agricultural Council 1998/2001 105 19,639 105 19,639 $30,100,000 North Carolina Buncombe Co. 2001/2005 23 3,838 20 2,902 $3,869,746 ^ Currituck Co. 2001/---- 0 0 0 0 $0 Forsyth Co. - Soil and Water Conservation District 1984/1987 27 1,606 23 1,346 $2,022,591 Orange Co. 2000/2001 12 1,229 11 1,159 $2,566,553 ^ Oregon Yamhill Co. - Soil and Water Conservation District ~ (2010) 2003/2003 4 1,242 4 1,242 $0 Pennsylvania Buckingham Township 1991/1991 49 2,413 40 1,626 N/A Bucks Co. ~ (2010) 1989/1990 135 11,507 25 1,731 $31,037,894 Chester Co. 1989/1990 321 27,921 89 6,422 $29,978,024 Lancaster Co. 1980/1984 780 66,957 125 10,062 $16,211,594 Plumstead Township 1996/1997 54 2,048 43 1,371 $7,864,262 Solebury Township ~ (2005) 1996/1998 34 1,941 28 1,298 $17,400,000 ^ Virginia Albemarle Co. 2000/2002 37 7,175 32 5,518 $10,280,754 ^ Chesapeake, City of 2003/2006 3 208 3 208 $705,000 ^ Clarke Co. 2002/2003 57 3,560 49 2,605 $726,280 Fauquier Co. ~ (Additional Funds Spent to Date reported in 2010) 2002/2004 80 11,986 41 3,800 $9,490,600 Franklin Co. 2007/2008 1 160 0 0 $125,000 ^ Goochland Co. 2007/2007 4 685 3 184 $0 ^ Isle of Wight Co. 2005/2010 8 930 0 0 $0 ^ James City Co. ~ (2010) 2001/2003 5 469 4 366 $1,087,000 Loudoun Co. X 2000/2002 5 1,007 5 1,007 $2,670,000 New Kent Co. 2006/2009 1 96 1 96 $0 Northampton Co. 2006/2009 1 268 0 0 $0 Rappahannock Co. 2004/2006 2 450 0 0 $0 Spotsylvania Co. 2005/N/A 0 0 0 0 $0 Stafford Co. 2007/2009 1 98 0 0 $0 ^ Virginia Beach, City of + 1995/1997 154 8,622 149 8,476 $28,404,313 ^ Washington King Co. 1979/1984 199 13,267 199 13,267 $60,530,000 ^ San Juan Co. ~ (2009) 1990/1994 14 1,276 14 1,276 $2,219,752 Skagit Co. 1996/1998 107 7,965 107 7,965 $6,815,260 Thurston Co. X 1996/1998 18 942 18 942 $2,241,122 Whatcom Co. 2001/2002 12 671 11 641 $2,335,100 West Virginia Berkeley Co. 2000/2004 30 3,068 30 3,068 $8,496,950 Fayette Co. 2005/2007 3 246 3 246 $414,000 Grant Co. 2003/2007 2 430 1 73 $400,000 Greenbrier Co. 2004/2007 4 1,515 4 1,515 $544,000 Hampshire Co. 2004/2006 7 1,256 7 1,256 $1,050,625 Hardy Co. 2003/2003 4 707 4 707 $729,875 Jefferson Co. 2000/2003 24 2,271 24 2,271 $4,455,597 Mineral Co. 2010/2011 3 236 3 236 $251,750 Monroe Co. 2002/2005 8 1,656 8 1,656 $384,023 Morgan Co. 2000/2005 10 696 10 696 $961,100 Nicholas Co. 2004/2007 2 361 2 361 $264,000 Pocahontas Co. 2004/2008 6 452 6 452 $308,820 Preston Co. 2004/2007 2 256 1 89 $567,800 Wisconsin Bayfield, Town of - Bayfield Regional Conservancy 2002/2003 4 193 4 193 $274,160 Dane Co. ~ (2010) 1996/1997 17 1,693 17 1,693 $928,481 4 Dunn, Town of 1996/1997 24 2,835 24 2,835 $2,769,748 LOCAL TOTALS 3,280 358,749 $1,534,215,949 NOTE: For explanation of column headings and symbols, please see fact sheet text.

Status of Selected Local Programs as of January 2011 Additional Funds Spent to Date Program Funds Available Outstanding Applications $3,420,680 $2,137,524 15 $0 $7,000,000 27 Funding Sources Used to Date $15,574,235 $54,000 2 Local government contributions, private contributions, FRPP $0 $700,000 N/A Local government contributions $147,673 $0 40 Appropriations, FRPP Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, private contributions, $2,513,050 $500,000 2 property tax revenue, real estate transfer tax, sales tax, FRPP $50,000 N/A N/A District funds, private contributions N/A N/A 19 Bonds, private contributions, property tax revenue, real estate transfer tax, FRPP $750,000 $4,195,035 61 Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, FRPP Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, private contributions, $33,331,633 $7,234,388 121 use value assessment withdrawal penalties, FRPP Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, use value N/A N/A N/A assessment withdrawal penalties, FRPP N/A N/A N/A Bonds, property tax revenue, FRPP $0 N/A N/A Appropriations, bonds, private contributions, property tax revenue, FRPP $857,500 $880,918 4 transient lodging tax, FRPP Appropriations, local government contributions, use value assessment $0 $1,035,000 45 withdrawal penalties $2,237,731 $633,830 13 real estate transfer tax, use value assessment withdrawal penalties, FRPP $1,312,400 $1,649,314 0 property tax revenue, use value assessment withdrawal penalty, FRPP $0 $30,000 0 Local government contributions, property tax revenue $0 $0 0 Local government contributions $0 $2,700,896 25 Local government contributions $0 N/A N/A Bonds, local government contributions, FRPP N/A $0 0 Appropriations, transient lodging tax, FRPP $0 $464,000 1 Local government contributions, private contributions $0 $67,730 1 Local government contributions, transient lodging tax, FRPP N/A $100,000 1 use value assessment withdrawal penalty, FRPP $0 $256,000 N/A Mitigation fees, local government contributions, private contributions $0 $0 N/A Appropriations, sale of surplus property $0 $13,729,147 11 Appropriations, property tax revenue $850,000 $2,833,000 4 N/A N/A N/A Bonds, property tax revenue, real estate transfer tax, timber excise tax Local government contributions, private contributions, property $6,224,597 $650,000 13 tax revenue, timber excise tax, FRPP N/A $0 0 Property tax revenue $2,055,100 $592,933 5 Property tax revenue, real estate transfer tax, FRPP $4,417,718 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $100,000 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $200,000 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $544,000 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $1,133,625 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $816,775 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $2,965,192 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $251,750 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $513,045 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $961,100 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $264,000 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $202,908 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $334,000 N/A N/A Real estate transfer tax, FRPP $588,800 $0 N/A $5,975,459 N/A N/A $3,450,353 $1,000,000 24 $256,147,631 $202,994,902 864 Bonds, local government contributions, private contributions, real estate transfer tax, FRPP Local government contributions Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, private contributions, property tax revenue, FRPP Local government contributions, private contributions, property tax revenue, FRPP Property tax revenue, FRPP Appropriations, bonds, local government contributions, private contributions, property tax revenue, FRPP New York North Carolina Oregon Pennsylvania Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin 5

American farmland trust Farmland information center STATUS OF LOCAL PACE PROGRAMS For additional information on farmland protection and stewardship, contact the Farmland Information Center. The FIC offers a staffed answer service and online library with fact sheets, laws, sample documents and other educational materials. (continued from page 1) The federal Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program (FRPP) provides matching funds to state, local and tribal governments and certain non-governmental organizations to purchase agricultural conservation easements. The 2008 Farm Bill authorized $743 million for the FRPP through fiscal year 2012. In addition to these sources of funding, several programs reported financial contributions from private sources. NOTES [^] Program Funds Spent to Date includes incidental land acquisition costs and/or personnel costs. [~] Figure carried forward from previous PACE tables. [ ] Programs enter into installment purchase agreements (IPAs) with landowners. IPAs are structured so that landowners receive semiannual, tax-exempt interest over a term of years (typically 20 to 30). The principal is due at the end of the term. Landowners can convert IPAs into securities that can be sold to recover the principal at any time. Programs often purchase U.S. zero-coupon bonds to cover the final balloon payment. The interest payments are generally funded by a dedicated revenue source, such as a real estate transfer tax. Therefore, Program Funds Spent to Date may appear relatively low for these jurisdictions. [ ] Maryland s Carroll and Frederick Counties offer critical farms programs. The programs allow landowners to sell to the county options to buy their easements for 75 percent of the appraised easement value. In exchange, landowners apply to the state PACE program. If the state approves the application, the landowner must repay the county from the proceeds. If the state application is not approved within five years, the county holds the easement, unless the landowner repays the program, with interest. Figures for Carroll and Frederick Counties may include critical farm projects that have not yet been approved by the state. [ ] program activity includes fee simple acquisitions. [ ] Program Funds Available includes money for other land conservation purposes. [X] Program has terminated or is no longer acquiring agricultural conservation easements. [+] and represents the number of parcels protected. Program staff track individual parcels, rather than number of easements or restrictions acquired. www.farmlandinfo.org (800) 370-4879 1 Short Street, Suite 2 Northampton, MA 01060 (800) 370-4879 www.farmlandinfo.org AMERICAN FARMLAND TRUST NATIONAL OFFICE 1200 18th Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-7300 www.farmland.org 6 The (FIC) is a clearinghouse for information about farmland protection and stewardship. The FIC is a public /private partnership between the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and American Farmland Trust.