Increasing Foreclosures Could Hurt Demand for Homes, Slowing Housing Recovery

Similar documents
Release Date: May 21, 2009 March Key Characteristics

Foreclosures Continue to Bring Home Prices Down * FNC releases Q Update of Market Distress and Foreclosure Discount

Release Date: July 23, 2009 May 2009

Metropolitan Area Statistics

Jim & Jim McKenna LBA & LSA TheJims.com

RPX Manhattan Neighborhood Prices

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - May

National Housing Trends

An Introduction to RPX INTRODUCTION

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - March

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - March

National Housing Trends

Metropolitan Area Statistics (1Q 2013)

U.S. Economic and Institutional Apartment Market Overview and Outlook. January 7, 2015

2017 RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE MARKET REPORT

RPX HOUSING MARKET REVIEW

Economic Highlights. Payroll Employment Growth by State 1. Durable Goods 2. The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index 3

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PRICES REMAIN IN SLOWDOWN PATTERN AS MARKET REACTS TO INVESTOR PULLBACK

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - February

MARKET OUTLOOK FOR SAN MATEO

Recovery? Growth? Jobs? Capital Investment?

A SIMULATION: MEASURING THE EFFECT OF HOUSING STIMULUS PROGRAMS ON FUTURE HOUSE PRICES

Analyst s Handbook: Real Estate

2019 Housing Market Forecast. Palos Verdes Peninsula AOR January 8, 2019 Jordan G. Levine Senior Economist

Housing Affordability: Local and National Perspectives

THE OUTLOOK FOR HOUSING IN ILLINOIS

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - January

By several measures, homebuilding made a comeback in 2012 (Figure 6). After falling another 8.6 percent in 2011, single-family

Real gross domestic product California vs. United States

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, January 2019

The Housing Market Report Card October 20, 2011 Tim Sullivan, Principal

Residential December 2009

MARKET STRATEGY VIEWPOINT U.S. Housing Decelerating

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics October 2018

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics November 2018

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS RESEARCH DIVISION

Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing

The U.S. Housing Confidence Index

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, August 2017

ECONOMIC COMMENTARY. Housing Recovery: How Far Have We Come? Daniel Hartley and Kyle Fee

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics December 2018

Economic and Housing Market Outlook ( ) October 31, Contra Costa AOR

U.S. GDP (2012 Q Q2)

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - November

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, December 2015

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics September 2018

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, April 2018

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, May 2018

April 4, p.m. Eastern

CBER-LIED Report on Housing Market Conditions

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

Phoenix, Central and Northern Arizona

IRVINE, Calif. May 8, 2014

Market Trends and Outlook

Western Economic Developments

Real Estate Update. elearning series. Upcoming elearning series. Year-End Planning. September 16

Black Knight Home Price Index Report: June Transactions U.S. Home Prices Up 0.8 Percent for the Month; Up 5.5 Percent Year-Over-Year

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics May 2018

REALTOR.COM MARKET OUTLOOK

California Housing Market Update. Monthly Sales and Price Statistics August 2018

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, April 2013

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, March 2019

REALTOR.COM MARKET OUTLOOK

CME Housing Futures & Options. May 2006

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 3, Issue 1. THE SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY Introduction

SE Michigan Residential Real Estate Recovery Are we there yet or is it over?

1200 Premier Drive, Suite 140 Chattanooga, TN Each office is independently owned and operated.

Minneapolis St. Paul Residential Real Estate Index

Residential March 2010

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, October 2014

2018 Housing Market Outlook. Central Coast Realty Group Business Symposium February 22, 2018 Oscar Wei Senior Economist

MAMA Risk Summary Data through 2011 Q3

STATE OF THE MULTIFAMILY MARKET MACRO VIEW

Monthly Indicators + 7.3% + 6.6% + 8.3% Single-Family Market Overview Condo Market Overview New Listings Pending Sales.

Residential January 2010

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, July 2016

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, June 2012

Minneapolis St. Paul Residential Real Estate Index

CALIFORNIA ECONOMIC & MARKET OUTLOOK. October 29,2014 Contra Costa Association of REALTORS Leslie Appleton Young, Chief Economist

The Market Watch Monthly Housing Report. Coachella Valley Median Detached Home Price Dec Dec 2016

Home Price Monitor August 2012 National Association of REALTORS

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, March 2017

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 4, Issue 3. THE Introduction SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY

Monthly Indicators + 4.8% - 3.5% %

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, March 2018

Ventura County. Economic Profile. November 2008

Residential October 2009

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Current State and Direction of the Housing and Mortgage Markets From a Micro Market Metric Perspective. Nov. 23, 2009 for UC Berkeley Outlook

Housing Market Cycles

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: David B. Bennett President & CEO Phone:

TUCSON and SOUTHERN ARIZONA

Cycle Forecast Real Estate Market Cycles Second Quarter 2018 Estimates

Residential September 2010

(904) (904)

PropertyShark.com Monthly Foreclosures Report

Housing Bulletin Monthly Report

LPS Home Price Index Report: October Transactions U.S. Home Prices Up 0.3 Percent for the Month; Up 4.3 Percent Year-Over-Year

(904) (904)

Transcription:

Release Date: April 22, 2010 February 2010 Quinn W. Eddins, Director of Research New Radar Logic data packages are available at /productsservices_analytics.html Increasing Foreclosures Could Hurt Demand for Homes, Slowing Housing Recovery In the past, we have discussed the impact of foreclosures on the housing markets mostly in terms of supply: foreclosures increase the inventory of repossessed properties owned by banks, who in turn seek to liquidate that inventory by selling homes at significant discounts, increasing the supply of relatively low-priced homes and putting downward pressure on prices. But foreclosures also pose a threat to housing demand, particularly given the heightened media attention the problem has attracted: potential buyers could delay their plans to purchase a house because they are concerned that foreclosures will induce a second precipitous decline in housing values. Such fears could be self-fulfilling if demand slackens to the point where it can no longer keep pace with foreclosure-driven supply. Last Thursday, RealtyTrac announced that foreclosure filings set a record in March, with filings reported on 367,056 properties, the highest monthly total since RealtyTrac began issuing its report in January 2005. In light of this news and current anxieties over foreclosures, we are increasingly concerned about the threat that foreclosures pose to housing demand, and thus to a timely recovery of the housing markets. We still believe that low home prices and low mortgage rates will continue to spur sufficient housing demand to absorb foreclosure-driven increases in supply at current price levels (controlling for seasonal price effects). However, we will watch foreclosure rates and sales activity closely in the coming months for signs of flagging homebuyer confidence. Trends in Home Prices and Home Sales The 25-MSA RPX Composite price remained flat in February on both a month-over-month and year-over-year basis (please see Exhibits 3 and 10). The horizontal price movement represents the best one-month price trend for the month of February since 2007. The three-month price trend ending February 2010, while negative, marked an improvement over steep February declines in 2008 and 2009. The stability in the 25-MSA RPX Composite price from January to February 2010 was driven by increases in the RPX prices for western MSAs (please see Exhibit 4). The RPX composite price for the western region increased 2% in February on a month-over-month basis, while the RPX prices for the Midwest, Northeast and South each declined 2%. The 25-MSA transaction count increased 37% between February 2009 and February 2010. As can be seen in Exhibit 3, this was the first year-over-year increase during the month of February since 2005. The 25-MSA RPX transaction count increased 16% month over month. In absolute terms, this one-month trend was similar to the February gains in 2006 through 2009. The three-month transaction count trend was more negative than it has been in years due to the large and rapid decline in transactions in December and January. On a year-over-year basis, transactions increased the most in MSAs that have been hit hardest by foreclosures: Las Vegas, Chicago, Miami and Detroit (please see Exhibits 9 and 14). The RPX transaction count for Las Vegas has increased almost 300% since February 2009. The largest month-over-month increases in sales activity occurred in Southern California, with Los Angeles and San Diego both exhibiting 39% gains in transaction counts (please see Exhibit 15). 1

Throughout the 25 MSAs tracked by Radar Logic, motivated sales increased slightly as a percentage of total sales between mid-january and mid-february. 1 During the 28 days ending January 18, 29% of home sales in the 25 MSAs tracked by Radar Logic were motivated sales. In the 28 days ending February 18, 30% of home sales were motivated. The increase in motivated sales as a percentage of total sales was the result of a 20% increase in motivated sales combined with a 12% decrease in other sales (please see Exhibits 5 and 6). As of February 2010, the 25-MSA RPX Composite price for motivated sales was 38% lower than the composite price for other sales (please see Exhibit 8). This significant discount is, in part, a function of financial institutions cutting prices in order to expedite the liquidation of their inventory of real estate owned (REO). However, this is not the whole story. Exhibits 16 and 22 show that the motivated discount also arises from the fact that motivated sales are concentrated in neighborhoods where home prices have historically been low relative to the surrounding metropolitan areas. February 2010 S&P/Case-Shiller Composite Home Price Indices In the RPX Housing Market Report for January 2010, which we released March 24, we used our Daily Prices to predict the S&P/Case-Shiller 10-City and 20-City composite home price indices for January. We predicted the 10-City index would be approximately 157, and the 20-City index would be about 145. The actual values, released March 30, 2010, were 157.89 and 145.32, respectively. This month, we expect the S&P/Case-Shiller composites to remain steady relative to their January levels. The February 2010 10-City composite will be roughly 157 and the 20-City composite will be roughly 144. 1 Motivated sales are foreclosure auction sales and liquidity-driven sales by financial institutions and foreclosure service firms 2

Exhibit 1: 25-MSA RPX Composite Price (28-Day), 2000-2010 $180 $160 February 18 $140 $120 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Source: Radar Logic, 28-Day RPX TM Composite prices as of 2/18/2010 Exhibit 2: 25-MSA RPX Transaction Count (28-Day), 2000-2010 200,000 180,000 160,000 February 18 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10 Source: Radar Logic, 28-Day RPX TM Composite transaction counts as of 2/18/2010 3

Exhibit 3: One-, Three- and Twelve-Month Change in the RPX Composite Price and Transaction Count vs. Past Years 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 6.0% One-Month Change in the 25-MSA Composite Price, January 18 to February 18 % Change (left axis) $ Change (right axis) $6.00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 Three-Month Change in the 25-MSA Composite Price, November 18 to February 18 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00 $4.00 % Change (left axis) $ Change (right axis) $9.00 30.0% 25.0% 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% One-Month Change in the 25-MSA Transaction Count, January 18 to February 18 % Change (left axis) # Change (right axis) 30,000 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 Three-Month Change in the 25-MSA Transaction Count, November 18 to February 18 % Change (left axis) # Change (right axis) 0 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 4.0% $6.00 5.0% 7,500 2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% $3.00 $0.00 $3.00 $6.00 $9.00 $12.00 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 15,000 22,500 30,000 37,500 45,000 10.0% $15.00 35.0% 52,500 12.0% $18.00 40.0% 60,000 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 25.0% Twelve-Month Change in the 25-MSA Composite Price through February % Change (left axis) $ Change (right axis) $50.00 40.0% Twelve-Month Change in the 25-MSA Transaction Count through February % Change (left axis) # Change (right axis) 40,000 20.0% 15.0% 10.0% $40.00 $30.00 $20.00 30.0% 20.0% 30,000 20,000 5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% $10.00 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 10,000 0 10,000 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 20.0% 30.0% 20,000 30,000 30.0% $60.00 40.0% 40,000 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 Source: Radar Logic, 28-Day RPX TM Composite prices as of 2/18/2010 4

Exhibit 4: 28-Day Regional RPX Composite Prices 2345 $205 RPX 25-MSA Composite Price, 2009-2010 $195 $190 $185 $180 Feb 09 Mar 09 Apr 09 May 09 Jun 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09 Nov 09 Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10 RPX Midwest Compoite Price 2 RPX Northeast Composite Price 3 $125 $120 $115 $110 $105 $100 $95 $235 $230 $225 $215 $210 Feb 09 Mar 09 Apr 09 May 09 Jun 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09 Nov 09 Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10 Feb 09 Mar 09 Apr 09 May 09 Jun 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09 Nov 09 Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10 $235 RPX West Composite Price 4 $135 RPX South Composite Price 5 $230 $225 $130 $125 $215 $120 $210 $115 $205 $110 Feb 09 Mar 09 Apr 09 May 09 Jun 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09 Nov 09 Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10 Feb 09 Mar 09 Apr 09 May 09 Jun 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09 Nov 09 Dec 09 Jan 10 Feb 10 Source: Radar Logic, 28-Day RPX TM values as of 2/18/2010 2 The RPX Midwest composite is a weighted average of RPX values for Chicago, Cleveland, Columbus, Detroit, Minneapolis, Milwaukee and St. Louis. 3 The RPX Northeast composite is a weighted average of RPX values for Boston, New York and Philadelphia. 4 The RPX West composite is a weighted average of RPX values for Denver, Las Vegas, Los Angeles, Phoenix, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose and Seattle. 5 The RPX South composite is a weighted average of RPX values for Atlanta, Charlotte, Jacksonville, Miami, Tampa and Washington DC. 5

Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 25-MSA Composite - Motivated and Other Transaction Counts, 2007-2010 Motivated TC Other TC 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 25-MSA Composite - Motivated Transaction Count as % of Total Transaction Count, 2007-2010 Motivated TC % of Total TC 25 MSA RPX Composite Price $340 $180 $160 $140 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 $180 $160 $140 $120 $100 Exhibit 9 25-MSA Composite - Motivated, Other and MSA- Wide Prices, 2007-2010 Motivated Price Other Price MSA Price 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 25-MSA Composite - Motivated Sales Price Discount Relative to Other Sales, 2007-2010 Discount of Motivated Price v. Other Price 25 MSA RPX Composite Price $340 $180 $160 $140 Motivated Sales as a Percent of Total Sales, 25 MSAs 70% 60% 50% 2/18/2010 2/18/2009 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Source: Radar Logic 6

Exhibit 10: Radar Logic Daily Prices in 25 Metropolitan Statistical Areas (Ranked by 1-Year % Change) 67 February 2010 Rank January 2010 Rank MSA PPSF February 2010 vs. February 2009 February 2009 vs. February 2008 February 2010 vs. January 2010 February 2009 vs. January 2009 1 1 Boston, MA $183.52 17.1% -22.3% -1.7% -4.8% 2 2 San Diego, CA $215.73 13.7% -26.0% 5.1% 0.6% 3 6 Denver, CO $123.92 9.5% -10.7% 1.3% -3.4% 4 4 San Jose, CA $319.58 6.4% -29.8% 0.5% 0.4% 5 8 Los Angeles, CA $250.60 4.8% -25.3% 4.0% 1.2% 6 3 San Francisco, CA $257.72 4.2% -32.7% 0.7% 4.8% 7 11 Columbus, OH $85.91 4.1% -9.2% 2.5% -4.3% 8 14 Philadelphia, PA $136.20 1.2% -9.3% -0.5% -6.0% 9 17 Phoenix, AZ $81.77 0.2% -39.1% 2.1% -4.0% 10 7 St. Louis, MO 6 $94.93-0.3% 0.1% -2.8% 1.7% 11 5 Charlotte, NC $85.79-1.6% -9.0% -2.7% 3.3% 12 10 New York, NY $236.35-2.2% -17.4% -2.4% -1.6% 13 16 Minneapolis, MN $108.42-2.7% -19.3% 0.8% -2.2% 14 12 Sacramento, CA $117.49-3.1% -26.0% -1.0% -1.4% 15 18 Tampa, FL $81.24-7.4% -23.5% -2.5% -2.1% 16 13 Milwaukee, WI $96.50-7.9% -1.6% -5.2% -1.1% 17 21 Seattle, WA $165.74-8.5% -14.8% 0.2% -1.7% 18 19 Jacksonville, FL $83.65-9.6% -17.2% -3.2% -2.1% 19 9 Washington, DC $163.14-9.8% -13.8% -3.0% 7.5% 20 15 Cleveland, OH $67.33-11.7% -12.3% -4.2% 3.1% 21 20 Atlanta, GA $68.03-13.1% -15.1% -3.7% 0.3% 22 23 Miami, FL $102.37-14.1% -30.4% -0.1% -4.4% 23 25 Las Vegas, NV $76.18-16.1% -32.1% 0.5% -6.4% 24 22 Detroit, MI $61.26-16.2% -23.2% -6.1% -3.7% 25 24 Chicago, IL $112.71-17.3% -16.5% -1.0% -2.8% 25-MSA Composite $186.24-0.2% -22.2% 0.0% -0.3% Manhattan Condo 7 $1,018.21-9.2% -3.8% 3.5% -4.6% Source: 28-Day RPX TM value for each MSA as of 2/18/2010 = positive = neutral = negative Exhibit 11:Radar Logic Daily Prices Year-Over-Year Change 25% 15% 5% 5% 15% 25% Exhibit 12: Radar Logic Daily Prices Month-Over-Month Change 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 2% 4% 6% Boston, MA San Diego, CA Denver, CO San Jose, CA Los Angeles, CA San Francisco, CA Columbus, OH Philadelphia, PA Phoenix, AZ St. Louis, MO 0.3% Charlotte, NC 1.6% New York, NY 2.2% Minneapolis, MN 2.7% Sacramento, CA 3.1% Tampa, FL 7.4% Milwaukee, WI 7.9% Seattle, WA 8.5% Jacksonville, FL 9.6% Washington, DC 9.8% Cleveland, OH 11.7% Atlanta, GA 13.1% Miami, FL 14.1% Las Vegas, NV 16.1% Detroit, MI 16.2% Chicago, IL 17.3% 17.1% 13.7% 9.5% 6.4% 4.8% 4.2% 4.1% 1.2% 0.2% San Diego, CA Los Angeles, CA Columbus, OH Phoenix, AZ Denver, CO Minneapolis, MN San Francisco, CA Las Vegas, NV San Jose, CA Seattle, WA Miami, FL Philadelphia, PA Sacramento, CA Chicago, IL Boston, MA New York, NY Charlotte, NC Tampa, FL St. Louis, MO Washington, DC Jacksonville, FL Atlanta, GA Milwaukee, WI Cleveland, OH Detroit, MI 0.1% 0.5% 0.9% 1.1% 1.7% 2.4% 2.7% 2.7% 2.8% 3.0% 3.3% 3.7% 4.0% 4.2% 6.1% 5.1% 4.0% 2.7% 2.1% 1.4% 0.8% 0.8% 0.6% 0.5% 0.2% 25 MSA Composite 0.2% 25 MSA Composite 0.0% Source: 28-Day RPX TM value for each MSA as of 2/18/2010 Source: 28-Day RPX TM value for each MSA as of 2/18/2010 6 Historical prices used to calculate changes in St. Louis include late-arriving data not included in published series. 7 Manhattan Condo is a subset of the New York MSA. 7

Exhibit 13: Transaction Counts 8 MSA February 2010 vs. February 2009 vs. February 2010 vs. February 2009 vs. February 2009 February 2008 January 2010 January 2009 Las Vegas, NV 299.4% -56.7% 11.8% -35.6% Chicago, IL 83.4% 3.0% 13.2% 25.3% Miami, FL 72.9% 4.6% 18.2% 29.2% Detroit, MI 68.5% -11.7% 11.0% 31.3% New York, NY 66.6% -39.0% 5.3% 7.3% Cleveland, OH 60.3% -28.2% 18.2% 1.7% Minneapolis, MN 59.9% -16.5% 14.9% 7.1% Jacksonville, FL 56.5% -25.2% 17.3% 11.2% Philadelphia, PA 40.6% -14.7% 5.2% 2.4% Tampa, FL 34.5% -6.1% 10.7% 19.8% Seattle, WA 33.7% -31.6% 24.5% 33.9% Charlotte, NC 31.2% -53.9% 27.0% 28.7% Phoenix, AZ 30.4% 30.7% 33.7% 44.8% San Jose, CA 26.5% 47.3% 16.3% 32.0% Columbus, OH 23.5% -36.4% 4.0% 19.6% Milwaukee, WI 23.4% -22.5% -4.0% 14.4% Los Angeles, CA 23.0% 39.1% 40.0% 50.6% Washington, DC 22.6% -5.0% -14.0% -13.7% Atlanta, GA 22.5% -23.4% 8.3% 17.0% San Francisco, CA 21.2% 24.5% 19.0% 23.5% San Diego, CA 12.4% 28.5% 39.8% 36.6% St. Louis, MO 11.9% 93.4% 9.4% 54.2% Denver, CO 9.6% -14.3% 14.1% 24.4% Sacramento, CA 5.4% 39.6% 12.9% 19.6% Boston, MA -2.7% 13.0% 7.9% 6.0% 25-MSA Composite 36.8% -3.6% 15.5% 20.7% Manhattan Condominium 91.2% -60.5% 26.3% 20.7% Source: 28-Day RPX analytics as of 2/18/2010 Exhibit 14: Transaction Counts Year-Over-Year Change 75% 25% 125% 225% 325% Exhibit 15: Transaction Counts Month-Over-Month Change 25% 15% 5% 5% 15% 25% 35% 45% Las Vegas, NV Chicago, IL Miami, FL Detroit, MI New York, NY Cleveland, OH Minneapolis, MN Jacksonville, FL Philadelphia, PA Tampa, FL Seattle, WA Charlotte, NC Phoenix, AZ San Jose, CA Columbus, OH Milwaukee, WI Los Angeles, CA Washington, DC Atlanta, GA San Francisco, CA San Diego, CA St. Louis, MO Denver, CO Sacramento, CA Boston, MA 2.7% 83.4% 72.9% 68.5% 66.6% 60.3% 59.9% 56.5% 40.6% 34.5% 33.7% 31.2% 30.4% 26.5% 23.5% 23.4% 23.0% 22.6% 22.5% 21.2% 12.4% 11.9% 9.6% 5.4% 299.4% San Diego, CA Los Angeles, CA Phoenix, AZ Charlotte, NC Seattle, WA San Francisco, CA Cleveland, OH Miami, FL Jacksonville, FL San Jose, CA Minneapolis, MN Denver, CO Chicago, IL Sacramento, CA Las Vegas, NV Detroit, MI Tampa, FL St. Louis, MO Atlanta, GA Boston, MA New York, NY Philadelphia, PA Columbus, OH Milwaukee, WI Washington, DC 4.0% 14.0% 39.4% 39.2% 33.4% 27.0% 24.5% 18.6% 18.2% 18.1% 17.1% 15.9% 14.1% 14.0% 13.0% 12.7% 11.6% 11.0% 10.3% 9.4% 8.2% 7.9% 5.2% 5.2% 3.7% 25 MSA Composite 36.8% 25 MSA Composite 15.5% Source: 28-Day RPX TM value for each MSA as of 2/18/2010 Source: 28-Day RPX TM value for each MSA as of 2/18/2010 8 Transaction counts represent the transactions included in the calculation of the Radar Logic Daily Prices and may not reflect transaction volume in the market. 8

Exhibit 16: Los Angeles MSA Motivated and Other Sales and Price Quartiles Motivated Sales Other Sales Top 25% of Zip Codes by Sale Price Second 25% of Zip Codes by Sale Third 25% of Zip Codes by Sale Bottom 25% of Zip Codes by Sale Price Source: Radar Logic Motivated transactions are concentrated in relatively low-priced communities in South Los Angeles (e.g., Compton, Inglewood, Long Beach, South Central Los Angeles, Watts), the San Fernando Valley (e.g., Chatsworth, Mission Hills, Northridge, Reseda, Sun Valley), the San Gabriel Valley (e.g., Azusa, Baldwin Park, Covina, San Dimas, West Covina), the Gateway Cities in Southwest San Gabriel Valley (e.g., Downey, East Los Angeles, Norwalk, Pico Rivera, Whittier) and Orange County (e.g., Anaheim, Fullerton, Garden Grove, Orange, Santa Ana). The concentration of motivated sales in communities with less expensive homes partially accounts for the 30% discount in the Los Angeles motivated price relative to the Los Angeles other price. Not only are motivated sellers more likely than other sellers to cut prices in order to move inventory, but homes that pass through the foreclosure process are located in areas where housing has historically been inexpensive relative to the greater Los Angeles metro area on the whole. 9

Exhibit 17 RPX Los Angeles Price, 2000-2010 $420 $370 $270 $170 $120 Jan 00 Jan 01 Jan 02 Jan 03 Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Exhibit 18 Exhibit 19 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 Los Angeles - Motivated and Other Transaction Counts, 2007-2010 Motivated TC Other TC 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Los Angeles - Motivated Transaction Count as % of Total Transaction Count, 2007-2010 Motivated TC % of Total TC 25 MSA RPX Composite Price $440 $400 $360 Exhibit 20 Exhibit 21 $450 $400 $350 Los Angeles - Motivated, Other and MSA-Wide Prices, 2007-2010 Motivated Price Other Price MSA Price 45% 40% 35% Los Angeles - Motivated Sales Price Discount Relative to Other Sales, 2007-2010 Discount of Motivated Price v. Other Price 25 MSA RPX Composite Price $440 $400 $360 $250 30% 25% 20% $150 15% $100 10% Source: Radar Logic 10

Exhibit 22: New York MSA Motivated and Other Sales and Price Quartiles Motivated Sales Other Sales Top 25% of Zip Codes by Sale Price Second 25% of Zip Codes by Sale Third 25% of Zip Codes by Sale Bottom 25% of Zip Codes by Sale Price Source: Radar Logic Motivated sales are concentrated in low-price communities in Brooklyn (Bedford-Stuyvesant, East New York), Queens (Jamaica, Rockaway, Southwest Queens), Southern Nassau County (Elmont, Hempstead, Roosevelt), the Bronx (Crotona-Tremont, Northeast Bronx) and New Jersey (Hillside, Paterson). 11

Exhibit 23 RPX New York Price, 2000-2010 $180 $160 $140 $120 Jan 00 Jan 01 Jan 02 Jan 03 Jan 04 Jan 05 Jan 06 Jan 07 Jan 08 Jan 09 Jan 10 Exhibit 24 Exhibit 25 8,000 7,000 New York - Motivated and Other Transaction Counts, 2007-2010 Motivated TC Other TC 12% 10% New York - Motivated Transaction Count as % of Total Transaction Count, 2007-2010 Motivated TC % of Total TC 25 MSA RPX Composite Price $340 6,000 8% 5,000 4,000 6% 3,000 4% 2,000 1,000 2% 0 0% Exhibit 26 Exhibit 27 $350 New York - Motivated, Other and MSA-Wide Prices, 2007-2010 Motivated Price Other Price MSA Price 90% 75% 60% New York - Motivated Sales Price Discount Relative to Other Sales, 2007-2010 Discount of Motivated Price v. Other Price 25 MSA RPX Composite Price $340 $250 45% 30% $150 15% $100 0% Source: Radar Logic 12

RPX Forward Price Fixings Price fixings are established each trading day by a dealer poll and represent the midmarket expectation for the reference value to be published on the contract expiration date. For the chart below, the 25-MSA RPX Composite prices are plotted on a publication date basis. The names of the series indicate the dates those price fixings were published. Exhibit 28: Historical Fixings for RPX Composite Forwards RPX Composite Price 12/18/2009 2/19/2010 4/19/2010 $180 $160 $140 $120 $100 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Source: Official RPX Daily Fixings as of 4/19/2010 Exhibit 29: Cumulative Home Price Appreciation Implied by RPX Composite Forward Fixings as of 4/19/2010 28-Day RPX on 2/18/2010 12/31/2010 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2014 $186.24 6.6% 6.9% 7.1% 7.4% 7.7% Source: Official RPX Daily Fixings as of 4/19/2010 13

Release The following table contains economic and housing market data released in March and April 2010. Current Economic and Housing Market Data Released On Date For Period of Value Released Prior Value U.S. Dept. of Commerce: Real Gross Domestic Product Q/Q Change 3/26/2010 Q4 5.6% 5.9% Standard & Poor s: S&P Case-Shiller Composite 10 3/30/2010 January 157.89 158.18 Standard & Poor s: S&P Case-Shiller Composite 20 3/30/2010 January 145.90 145.32 U.S. Dept. of Labor: Unemployment Rate 4/02/2010 March 9.7% 9.7% U.S. Dept. of Labor: Nonfarm Payrolls 4/02/2010 March 162,000-36,000 National Association of Realtors (NAR): Pending Home Sales Index 4/05/2010 February 97.6 90.4 U.S. Dept. of Labor: Consumer Price Index M/M Change 4/14/2010 March 0.0% 0.1% U.S Census Bureau: Retail Sales M/M Change 4/14/2010 March 1.6% 0.3% National Association of Home Builders (NAHB): Housing Market Index 4/15/2010 April 19 15 U.S Census Bureau: Housing Starts 4/16/2010 March 0.626 M 0.575 M Release The following calendar contains upcoming economic and housing market data releases in April and May 2010. About Radar Logic Radar Logic Incorporated, a real estate data and analytics company, calculates and publishes the Radar Logic Daily Prices. The prices track housing values for major U.S. metropolitan areas and are the basis of the Residential Property Index (RPX ), a market that enables real estate to be traded as a liquid asset, via property derivatives marketed by major financial institutions. RPX allows real estate and financial professionals to manage opportunity and risk, invest in real estate values without owning physical assets and effectively analyze markets using a consistent metric: price per square foot. Data in the RPX Monthly Housing Market Report reflect the 28-day aggregated value of Radar Logic Daily Prices. The price per square foot metric used significantly reduces the influence of property sizes on overall housing price trends, which can skew results. The Daily Prices for each MSA are not adjusted for seasonal variations. In some cases, Daily Prices may vary based on reporting characteristics within individual MSAs. The RPX Monthly Housing Market Report provides insight and detailed analysis of Radar Logic s 25 MSAs and the Manhattan Condo market. This study is based on the premise that there is no national housing market; rather, each MSA, while having some economic influences in common, is influenced primarily by local conditions. The March 2010 RPX Monthly Housing Market Report will be released on May 20, 2010, at 4:00 PM EDT. RPX Analytics & Research Housing Release Calendar Release Date U.S. Dept. of Labor: Producer Price Index 4/22/2010 National Association of Realtors (NAR): Existing Home Sales 4/22/2010 U.S. Census Bureau: New Home Sales 4/23/2010 Standard & Poor s: S&P Case-Shiller Composite 10 4/27/2010 Standard & Poor s: S&P Case-Shiller Composite 20 4/27/2010 U.S. Dept. of Commerce: Gross Domestic Product 4/30/2010 National Association of Realtors (NAR): Pending Home Sales Index 5/4/2010 U.S. Dept. of Labor: Unemployment Rate 5/7/2010 U.S. Dept. of Labor: Nonfarm Payrolls 5/7/2010 U.S Census Bureau: Retail Sales 5/14/2010 National Association of Home Builders (NAHB): Housing Market Index 5/17/2010 U.S Census Bureau: Housing Starts 5/18/2010 U.S. Dept. of Labor: Consumer Price Index 5/19/2010 Radar Logic offers specialized analytic services which allow real estate and financial professionals to view current and historical price per square foot and transaction count trends for all markets and sub-markets we track. MSAs can be segmented by location (zip code and 14

county), property type (single family, multi-family and condo), property size, date range, and sale price. The database is derived from our neutral, public source records. Our data provide a means for all entities associated with or affected by housing prices to maintain market data streams on a constant, neutral and daily-updated basis. For additional insight on this report or for inquiries about research or analytic products, please contact: Radar Logic Incorporated 180 Varick Street, Suite 502 New York, NY 10014 212.965.0300 info@radarlogic.com 2010 Radar Logic Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. Data presented AS IS. Radar Logic does not make, and hereby expressly disclaims, any representation or warranty of any manner in connection with the information including, without limitation, with respect to its accuracy, completeness or fitness for any purpose. This report may not be republished in whole or in part without the expressed permission of Radar Logic. 15