COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA (510)

Similar documents
COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 ELmhurst Street Hayward, CA

Santa Clara Valley Water District Page 1 of 2

BOARD AGENDA MEMO. A. Accept the fiscal year Safe, Clean Water and Natural Flood Protection Special Tax Summary Report (Attachment 1); and

ELSINORE VALLEY (ZONE 3) FLOOD CONTROL BENEFIT ASSESSMENT AREA

Water Investigation Zone No. 2 Fee Analysis Report Fiscal Year

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

To maintain a cohesive and unified organization. To provide informative and responsive services to the public. To be dedicated in the leadership of

RESOLUTION NO

McMULLIN AREA GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: WILDWOOD GLEN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT C-91

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 04/05/2016 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No. AO

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street I ayward, CA (510)

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Moraga Stormwater Fee Measure Ballot Procedure

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

EXHIBIT C. Assessor s Parcel or Parcel means a lot or parcel shown in an Assessor s Parcel Map with an assigned Assessor s Parcel number.

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968

CORDOVA RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT MEASURE J

CITY OF SIGNAL HILL SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE RATE ADJUSTMENT

City of Lafayette Staff Report

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3928

City of Santa Clarita

RESOLUTION NO

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, in adopting this Ordinance, the Board of Directors finds that:

NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN CITY OF ALAMEDA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (ALAMEDA LANDING MUNICIPAL SERVICES DISTRICT)

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD NO (West Lake Elsinore Public Improvements)

Troy Community Land Bank

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE "AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT"-A PROPOSED BALLOT INITIATIVE INTENDED TO REPEAL THE COSTA-HAWKINS RENTAL HOUSING ACT OF 1995

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA. O Kji ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR ARTS DISTRICT LOS ANGELES BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PROPERTY BASED)

IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY MEASURE City of Emeryville

THE VILLAGE AT LITCHFIELD PARK COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF HANOVER, N.H.

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

Preliminary Analysis

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. December 11, 2018

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

CITY OF. DATE: August 23, Mayor and City Council TO: Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. City Manager FROM:

Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District Ordinance Code: Ordinance CHAPTER 4 DRAINAGE FEES

ENGINEER S REPORT FOR. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (Golden Valley Ranch) Fiscal Year CITY OF SANTA CLARITA LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

House Joint Resolution 1

Change 6, September 1, TITLE 18 WATER AND SEWERS 1

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

CHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970

ANNUAL TOWNSHIP BUDGET For the Year Ending December 31, 2019 Township. Burleigh County, North Dakota C) TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report

WHEREAS, Alameda voters passed Measure L1 with 55.5% of the voters in favor of the measure; and

Office of the Executive Officer CONSENT CALENDAR March 13, 2007

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD (Rosetta Canyon Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. May 19, 2015

Order of Business. Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

CITY OF LAFAYETTE ENGINEER S REPORT LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO (RESIDENTIAL LIGHTING) FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018

TOWN OF PALM BEACH Information for Town Council Meeting on: July 12, 2017

Applying for a Conditional Use Permit

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. April 14, 2015

Town of Danville. Danville street lighting and landscape assessment district no

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 98-1 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR CITY OF WESTLAKE VILLAGE LIGHTING MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 FISCAL YEAR

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meetings of June 21, 2017 and June 28, 2017.

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT

EXHIBIT B COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (NORTH VINEYARD STATION NO. 1)

INTERDEPARTMENTAL M E M O R A N D U M. Preliminary Water Control District Rate Resolution

The FSZ: Preserving California's Prime Agricultural Farmland

FINAL ENGINEER S REPORT FOR. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (Golden Valley Ranch) Fiscal Year

ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR 1855 AND 1875 CLAYTON ROAD

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 91-2 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY ORDINANCE NO. WA0-0089

City of Santa Clarita

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2003

Honorable Members of the Rent Stabilization Board. Budget and Personnel Committee and Jay Kelekian, Executive Director

Middle Village Community Development District

BID PROPOSAL FORMS FOR THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CORONA IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Steven J. Pinkerton, Housing and Redevelopment Director

ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA

Submitted by: Jordan Klein, Acting Manager, Office of Economic Development

AGENDA: APRIL 13,1999 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF A PORTION OF AN OPEN SPACE EASEMENT, APN

Drainage Impact Fee AB 1600 Nexus Study Update to the Thermalito Master Drainage Plan

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR

ADOPT RESOLUTIONS OF SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION FOR UPCOMING BALLOT MEASURES

SPECIAL BOARD MEETING

Community Facilities District Report. Jurupa Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 13. September 14, 2015

F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

CITY OF MILTON, GEORGIA

CITY OF TAMPA Stormwater Utility Funding Frequently Asked Questions 2017

FINANCE DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M

The Future of Property Taxes in Florida. Amber Hughes Sr. Legislative Advocate Florida League of Cities

This unofficial copy was downloaded on Jul from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website:

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2005

ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

Transcription:

FLOOD CONTROL AGENDA ITEM # May 5, 2009 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA 94544-1307 (510) 670-5480 April 20, 2009 The Honorable Board of Supervisors County Administration Building 1221 Oak Street Oakland, CA 94612 Dear Board Members: SUBJECT: ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT (DISTRICT), BENEFIT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM FY 2009/10 ACCEPT ANNUAL ENGINEER'S REPORT; SET PUBLIC HEARING, HOLD PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT ASSESSMENTS RECOMMENDATION: In order to maintain the flood protection system in the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District), it is recommended that your Board: 1. Accept the Annual Engineer's Report, which describes the parcels of real property within the District and proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2009-2010; and 2. Set June 9, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., in your Chamber as the time and place for a public hearing concerning the Annual Engineer's Report and proposed assessments; and 3. Direct the Clerk to publish the notice of hearing once a week for two successive weeks, in accordance with Government Code Section 6066. 4. At the public hearing, hear and consider statements for or against the 2009-2010 Annual Engineer's Report and proposed assessments, and after the hearing, adopt a resolution confirming the Annual Engineer's Report and any adjustments made as result of the hearing, and establish the assessments for Fiscal Year 2009-2010. "To Serve and Preserve Our Community"

Honorable Board of Supervisors Page 2 April 20, 2009 SillVIMARYIDISCUSSION: The District Benefit Assessment Program pertains to Flood Control Zones 2, 2A, 3A, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12 and 13. The District maintains hundreds of miles of flood control channels, levees, storm water pump stations, detention ponds, silt basins, tide gates, dams, and reservoirs. These assessments are critical to the safe maintenance, operations, and improvements to those facilities. The District does not provide services for the cities of Alameda, Albany, Berkeley, and Piedmont. Flood Control Zone 7, located east of the Pleasanton Ridge, is served by a separate office and Board ofdirectors. District assessments are based on benefits received. Benefits are proportionate to the amount of storm water runoff from each parcel of property. Runoff relates directly to each parcel's size and use. Assessments will remain unchanged for Fiscal Year 2009-10. The total assessment revenue to be collected in Fiscal Year 2009-2010 is estimated at $9,346,000. FINANCING: The recommended assessments for the District are necessary to cover the costs of providing the flood control services, which could not otherwise be funded. As this District is self-supporting, no General Fund monies are used to finance its operations. Yours truly, /J ~. ~~ D",,~ldesenbet,Ph.D., P.E. Director of Public Works c: Hank Ackerman, Flood Control Manager County Counsel Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector DW/HA:mbc RE-HANK-RS Llr RAP FY 09-10.doc

Approved as to Form RICHARD E. WINNIE, County Counsel By:.~ ~ Deputy THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NUMBER: R RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT ENGINEER'S REPORT AND SET PUBLIC HEARING ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT WHEREAS, the Director of Public Works has filed with this Board of Supervisors a written Annual Engineer's Report concerning the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, Benefit Assessment Program for the 2009-2010 Fiscal Year, which report complies in all respects with the requirements of Alameda County Ordinances FC 79-2, FC 0-84-19, 0-93-27, and 0-93-28; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that such report be received and accepted, and that the Clerk of this Board is hereby directed to file the same; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Tuesday, June 9, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., is fixed as the date and time for the hearing to be held in the regular meeting room of the Board of Supervisors, Fifth Floor, Alameda County Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland, California 94612; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of this Board shall cause notice of the hearing to be published once a week for two (2) successive weeks in The Inter-City Express, such notice to be in substantially the following form: NOTICE OF HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Supervisors of the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, State of California, has received the Annual Engineer's Report concerning the benefit assessments for flood control purposes to be levied on real property in certain zones in the District for the 2009-2010 Fiscal Year, and that a public hearing upon such report will take place on Tuesday, June 9, 2009, at 9:30 a.m., in the regular meeting room of the Board of Supervisors, Fifth Floor, Alameda County Administration Building, 1221 Oak Street, Oakland, California 94612. At the hearing, the Board will hear and consider all protests. RE-Hank-Resolution Accept Rpt BAP 09-IO.doc

Flood Control fd Water Conservation IJlSIUICT Benefit Assessment Program Annual Engineer's Report Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Alameda County Public Works Agency 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA 94544 www.acgov.org/pwa; PH: 510-670-5480 MaY5,2oog

FY2009-10 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 2 II. District Zones 2 Page Map - Alameda County Flood Control Zones 3 III. Background 4 IV. Benefit Assessments Table 1 - Land Use Categories 4 5 V. Historical Assessments 5 VI. Proposed Assessments 6 Table 2 - Benefit Assessment Rates VII. Sample Assessment Calculations VIII. Engineer's Statement Table 3 - Estimated Revenue and Appropriations 6 7 8 8 RE-HANK-FLDES-BAP Report 09-1 O.Doc 1

FY2009-l0 I. INTRODUCTION The Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) Benefit Assessment Program Annual Engineer's Report (Report) is presented to the Alameda County Board of Supervisors annually for review and public hearing in compliance with Ordinances FC 79-2, 0-84-19, 0-93-27, 0-93-28, and 0-94-26. This Report describes the Benefit Assessment Program's background, proposed flood assessments, and explains how assessments are calculated. For more information and to view this report, visit www.acgov.org/pwa. Copies may be purchased for $6.00 each (contact information below). payable to Alameda County Treasurer. Make checks Alameda County Public Works Agency Maps & Files - Room 240 399 Elmhurst Street Hayward, CA 94544 Telephone #: (510) 670-5560 II. DISTRICT ZONES For purposes of flood control protection, the District is divided into zones that roughly correspond to major watershed boundaries (see Alameda County Flood Control Zones map, Page 3). RE-HANK-FLDES-BAP Report 09-10.Doc 2

Alameda County Flood Control Zones W+E S Legend ~~~'"... Crties /'V Highways.. WaterBody 7.2 ~ Coonty Boundary _4 I 12A 03A _5 0.9.67 Flood Control Zones c:::j 12.'3 " o Non-Zone C\..AIameda ColI'tY. Cdb'Na ~ PlbIicv.bftlsAgenoj u '.0,COO=O==20=PiiiOiiiO iii40.,oco=o======60:i,o~.a.. 1 Inch equals 26.000 fest

FY2009-10 III. BACKGROUND Historically, the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) levied a District-wide tax and zone assessments on an ad valorem basis under the District Act, Section 12. After the passage of Proposition 13, follow-up legislation (SB 154) defined special ad valorem assessments as taxes. This meant that District special assessments were subject to Proposition 13 limitations. The State Legislature recognized the vital public safety service furnished by flood control districts and passed AB 549 (Frazee), the Benefit Assessment Act of 1982. The Act authorized flood control districts to levy benefit assessments to help finance their operations. It required that assessments be proportionate to the runoff from each parcel ofproperty. The Benefit Assessment Program for Zones 2, 2A, 3A, 4, 5, 6, 12 and 13 was adopted by the Alameda County Board of Supervisors on September 18, 1979, following two public hearings. The Program was continued by voter approval (Average 73.4%) in June 1980. In 1982, AB 630 (Frazee) repealed AB 549 and authorized the District to continue to levy benefit assessments based on the proportionate amount of stonn water runoff from each parcel of property. In FY 1984/85, Zone 9 began its benefit assessment program by voter approval at 72.5%. With the passage of Proposition 218 in November 1996, increases in benefit assessment rates shall be by ballot of the property owners in the affected areas and the increase will only be valid if a majority of the property owners agree to the increase. The ballots shall be weighted in proportion to assessment liability. IV. BENEFIT ASSESSMENTS Law requires that assessments be based on estimated benefit, which may be based on the proportionate amount of stonn water runoff from each parcel of property. The amount of runoff relates directly to each parcel's size and use. Larger parcels would generate greater runoff, as would more highly developed parcels with a greater amount of impervious surfaces. The Board established five categories ofland use for assessment calculations (see Page 5, Table 1). Benefit Assessments are levied and collected at the same time as the County property taxes. RE-HANK-FLDES-BAP Report 09-IO.Doc 4

FY2009-10 TABLE 1 - LAND USE CATEGORIES Group A - Group B - Group C - Group D - Group E - Commercial and Industrial Institutions, Apartments/Condos (5 or more units); (churches, schools, hospitals; apartment and other multiple living, such as condos, mobile home parks, in excess of 4 units) Single Family; Small Multiple Residential/Townhomes (2-4 Units) Undeveloped land-vacant Land used for (agriculture, open space, farming, vineyards, crops, parks, etc. Vacant Land which is undisturbed (not tilled, planted or irrigated). This land may be used for grazing. V. HISTORICAL ASSESSMENTS The assessments listed below are minimum annual rates for Single Family Residence (SFR) properties. There has not been an increase in benefit assessment rates since Fiscal Year 1992/1993, with the exception of Zone 6 which was increased from $26.60 per residential parcel to $32.00 in 1993-1994. Zone 1992-1993 1993-1994 2009-2010 2 $ 26.60 $ 26.60 $ 26.60 2A - 0 - - 0 - - 0 3A 26.60 26.60 26.60 4 20.60 20.60 20.60 5 26.60 26.60 26.60 6 26.60 32.00 32.00 9 17.80 17.80 17.80 12 16.00 16.00 16.00 13-0- - 0- - 0 RE-HANK-FLDES-BAP Report 09-1 O.Doc 5

FY 2009-10 v. PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS The assessment rates listed in the Benefit Assessment Table below are necessary for the District to continue to operate and maintain the existing flood control system. TABLE 2 - BENEFIT ASSESSMENT ANNUAL RATES 2009-10 FISCAL YEAR Land Use Categories Group A Group B Group B-Condos Group C Group D Group E I Min. I Min. Charge I I Min. I Min. I Min. Zone $/Acre Assmt. $ $/Acre Assmt. $ Factor $ Rate $ $/Acre Assmt. $ $/Acre Assmt. $ $/Acre Assmt. $ 2 212.80 53.20 159.60 39.90 0.60 266 * 26.60 1.33 13.30 0.80 13.30 3A 212.80 53.20 159.60 39.90 0.60 266 * 26.60 1.33 13.30 0.80 13.30 4 164.80 41.20 123.60 30.90 0.60 206 * 20.60 1.03 10.30 0.62 10.30 5 212.80 53.20 159.60 39.90 0.60 266 * 26.60 1.33 13.30 0.80 13.30 6 256.00 64.00 192.00 48.00 0.60 320 * 32.00 1.60 16.00 0.96 16.00 9 142.40 35.60 106.80 26.70 0.60 178 * 17.80 0.89 8.90 0.53 8.90 12 128.00 32.00 96.00 24.00 0.60 160 * 16.00 0.80 8.00 0.48 8.00 * For areas over 0.25 acres, use the minimum annual rate for first 0.25 acre and the undeveloped land annual rate (Group D) for the remainder. RE-HANK-FLDES-BAP Report 09-IO.Doc 6

FY2009-10 VII. SAMPLE ASSESSMENT CALCULATIONS Assessments are based on three factors: 1) land use (assigned by Assessor); 2) land area (size ofparcel expressed in acres); and 3) property location (flood zone). Minimum Assessments - Parcels with an area less than 0.25 acre Benefiting properties with 4 or less units per parcel and an area of 0.25 acres or less are charged a minimum assessment per land use category. The following parcel areas are each charged the minimum assessments (see Page 6. Table 2) for their land use category and location. Examples: Use Table 2 - Benefit Assessment Rates to determine assessment rate Land Use Minimum Location Category/Group Parcel Area Assessment Zone 5 C Single Family Residence 0.23 ac. $ 26.60 Zone 12 C Single Family Residence 0.14 ac. $ 16.00 Zone 2 A Commercial Property 0.23 ac. $ 53.20 Parcels with an Area greater than 0.25 ac. Land Use Parcel Rate Location Category/Group Area Ac. Assessment Zone 2 A Commercial Property 3.0 ac. x 212.80 = $638.40 Zone 2 D Vacant Land - Vineyard 3.0 ac. x 1.33 = ($ 3.99*) 13.30 Zone 5 C Single Family Residence 1.26 ac. x See = $ 27.94 Below *Less than min. assessment; therefore, assessed $13.30 (min. rate) 1. 26 acres = 0.25 acre (minimum assessment) $ 26.60 1.01 acre at $1.33 per acre = +1.34 (1.01 acre at the vacant land rate) Condominiums (5 or more units): Assessment: $ 27.94 For parcels with condominium improvements (5 or more units), use Group B - Condos charge factor and rate. Ex: 17 condos in Oakland (Zone 12); lot size = 0.12 acre; 0.12 ac. -;- 17 condos = 0.0071 acre per condo. Assessment = 0.007 ac./condo x $0.60 (charge factor) x $160 (rate) = $0.6776 or 68 per condo. RE-HANK-FLDES-BAP Report 09-1 O.Doc 7

FY2009-10 VIII. ENGINEER'S STATEMENT WHEREAS, by Resolution, on May 5, 2009, the Board of Supervisors of the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (Board), State of California, in compliance with the Benefit Assessment Act (Act) will accept this Annual Engineer's Report stating the Board's intention to levy benefit assessments for flood control purposes for the 2009-10 Fiscal Year and hold public hearing; and WHEREAS, public notice will be published as required by State of California Government Code and Alameda County Ordinance Code provisions; and WHEREAS, by Resolution on June 9, 2009, the Board is expected to confinn the Annual Engineer's Report for the Benefit Assessment Program and adopt the assessment to be levied against each parcel; NOW, THEREFORE, the following assessment, with no increases from the prior year, is made in order to cover the portion of the estimated cost of flood maintenance, operation, acquisitions, improvements, and costs and expenses incidental to be paid by the District. Designated capital reserves represent the accumulation of funds over time that are set aside for specific future flood control projects. TABLE 3 - ESTIMATED REVENUE AND APPROPRIATIONS Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Benefit Assessment Program Estimated Revenue and Appropriations 2009-2010 FISCAL YEAR Budget Organization Flood Control Zones Total Beginning Fund Balance Available (Estimated) 270311 2 2,602 270321 2A 2,244 270331 3A 10,818 270341 4 445 270351 5 24,139 270361 6 17,737 270371 9 407 270381 12 11,526 270391 13 6,834 TOTALS 76,752 (Dollars X 1,000) Property Taxes 2,783 206 3,275 186 5,376 3,440 165 6,027 677 22,135 ESTIMATED REVENUE Misc. Revenue 972 102 643 64 990 1,107 38 1,809 302 6,027 Benefit Assessment 1,608 0 1,451 204 2,106 1,691 240 2,046 0 9,346 Total Revenue 5,363 308 5,369 454 8,472 6,238 443 9,882 979 37,502 Appropriations 5,058 250 11,090 599 18,094 11,183 541 16,569 1,514 64,898 Designated Capital Reserves 3,000 2,300 5,000 300 13,200 12,500 300 5,000 6,300 47,900 RE-HANK-FLDES-BAP Report 09-1 O.Doc 8

FY2009-10 The recommended assessments upon the several subdivisions of land within the District are in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by the subdivisions, respectively, within the District and each ofthe listed zones, as described in the Boundary Map on file at the Agency's Elmhurst Street office in Hayward, CA. By: Dated: RE-HANK-FLDES-BAP Report 09-10.Doc 9