The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

Similar documents
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division

VARIANCE APPLICATION. Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Project Name: New Carrollton Town Center

DEPARTURE OF PARKING & LOADING STANDARDS DPLS-333

R E S O L U T I O N. 1. Request: A Departure from Parking and Loading Standards (DPLS-449) for 32 parking spaces.

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

R E S O L U T I O N. B. Development Data Summary

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

DPLS-266 AC Note: Staff reports can be accessed at

WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented at the public hearing on October 30, 2008, the Prince George's County Planning Board finds:

Bowie Marketplace Residential Detailed Site Plan Statement of Justification January 13, 2017 Revised February 2, 1017

WHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary

MEMORANDUM. City Council. David J. Deutsch City Manager. Resolution R TLBT, LLC Annapolis Road Annexation Plan. DATE: September 3, 2015

PGCPB No File No R E S O L U T I O N

Preliminary Plan

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

R E S O L U T I O N. Residential 384,918 sq. ft. To be demolished Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0 0.7

Chesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan

PGCPB No File No and R E S O L U T I O N

Note: Staff reports can be accessed at

R E S O L U T I O N PUBLIC HEARING

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

The entire Fairwood project is staged into two phases, Phase I and Phase II:

LONG RANGE AGENDA June 21, 2018 July 12, 2018

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/05/2014

Chapter Planned Residential Development Overlay

1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;

DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division

a. It is the intent of these regulations to encourage the preservation of natural resources and facilitate orderly growth in the County.

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

R E S O L U T I O N. 1. Request: The subject application requests the addition of a deck, patio, pool and fence to a singlefamily

Preliminary Plan

LONG RANGE AGENDA July 19, 2018 July 26, 2018

ARTICLE XVII SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to the following conditions:

ORDINANCE NO

Applications will be received on business days between 9:00 AM and 3:00 PM

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

Article 6: Planned Unit Developments

Community Development

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I

LONG RANGE AGENDA May 17, 2018 June 7, 2018

BE IT ORDAINED, by the City Council of the City of Saratoga Springs, New York, following a public hearing, as follows:

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MACUNGIE LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. ORDINANCE NO [To be considered for Adoption June 1, 2017]

R E S O L U T I O N. a. Remove Table B from the plan.

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

ALBEMARLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 18. ZONING SECTION 12. VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL - VR

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC - Agenda

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

DEVELOPMENT PLAN ORDINANCE

DIVISION 7. R-6 AND R-6A RESIDENTIAL ZONES* The purpose of the R-6 residential zone is:

Proposed Overland Park Kansas Ordinance RE-1 Residential Estates Community

COUNTY COUNCIL OF PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND, SITTING AS THE DISTRICT COUNCIL ZONING ORDINANCE NO

Cases Accepted or Approved between: 12/10/2018 and 12/16/2018

WESTMINSTER PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION

C O R R E C T E D R E S O L U T I O N

PGCPB No File No R E S O L U T I O N

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE DERBY ZONING REGULATIONS AUGUST 12, 2008

Planning Justification Report

ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: Northeast corner of Sandbridge Road and Atwoodtown Road ELECTION DISTRICT: PRINCESS ANNE

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

Preliminary Plan

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

PART 3 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS. Designation of Residential Zoning Districts and Purpose Statements.

AAAA. Planning and Zoning Staff Report Zoning Text Amendment, ZOA-PH Request

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

CREEKSIDE TOWNHOMES Chevy Chase, Maryland Site Plan No Preliminary Plan No

COUNTY OF EL DORADO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE MAP

PGCPB No File No and R E S O L U T I O N

WESTMINSTER PARK SUBDIVISION

Potential Rezoning Southwest Corner Eleven Mile and Beck Roads. (Bosco )

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT

TOWNSHIP OF SOLON COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN. Members: Robert Ellick, Fred Gunnell, Mark Hoskins, Mary Lou Poulsen

BARROW COUNTY, GEORGIA

WHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and

Salem Township Zoning Ordinance Page 50-1 ARTICLE 50.0: PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS:

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF LAUREL DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT


In order to permit maximum applicability of the PUD District, PUD-1 and PUD-2 Districts are hereby created.

Implementation. Approved Master Plan and SMA for Henson Creek-South Potomac 103

Rapid City Planning Commission

Cobb County Community Development Agency Zoning Division 1150 Powder Springs St. Marietta, Georgia 30064

CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS

May 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:

Guide to Preliminary Plans

Town of Gorham Development Transfer Fee Program SECTION XVIII DEVELOPMENT TRANSFER OVERLAY DISTRICT

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION

Transcription:

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm. Detailed Site Plan Application Project Name: Park Place Towers (The Phoenix) Location: Northeast quadrant of Baltimore Washington Parkway and Annapolis Road Applicant/Address: Federal Capitol J. Partners 10000 Potomac Street, NW Washington, DC 20007 General Data DSP-08023 Date Accepted: 07/11/2008 Planning Board Action Limit: Waived Acreage: 9.32 Zone: R-10 Dwelling Units: 22 Gross Floor Area: Planning Area: 69 Tier: Council District: 05 Municipality: 410,000 sq. ft. Developed Bladensburg 200-Scale Base Map: 205NE05 Purpose of Application Revitalization to add 22 dwelling units and fitness center/community rooms to the unused portions of three existing buildings and a 621-square-foot police substation in Building 5802. Notice Dates Informational Mailing: 04/18/2008 Acceptance Mailing: 07/10/2008 Sign Posting Deadline: 09/23/2008 Staff Recommendation Staff Reviewer: H. Zhang, AICP APPROVAL APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS X DISAPPROVAL DISCUSSION

THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY PLANNING BOARD STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Detailed Site Plan DSP-08023 Park Place Towers (The Phoenix) The Urban Design staff has completed a review of the subject application and appropriate referrals. The following evaluation and findings lead to a recommendation of APPROVAL with conditions, as described in the recommendation section of this report. EVALUATION This detailed site plan was reviewed and evaluated for compliance with the following criteria: a. The requirements of the Zoning Ordinance in the R-10 Zone, Residential Revitalization District, and the site design guidelines. b. The requirements of the Prince George s County Landscape Manual. c. The requirements of the Prince George s County Woodland Conservation and Tree Preservation Ordinance. d. Referral comments. FINDINGS Based upon the evaluation and analysis of the subject detailed site plan, the Urban Design staff recommends the following findings: 1. Request: The subject detailed site plan (DSP) application is for addition of 22 dwelling units and fitness rooms in the unused portions of the three existing buildings and a 621-square-foot police substation in Building 5802 in the R-10 (Multifamily High Density Residential) Zone.

2. Development Data Summary: EXISTING PROPOSED Zone(s) R-10 R-10 Use(s) Multifamily Multifamily/Police Substation Acreage 9.32 9.32 Total Dwelling Units 447 469 (Addition of 22 units) Total Gross Floor Area (Sq. Ft.) 410,000 410,000 OTHER DEVELOPMENT DATA REQUIRED PROPOSED Total Parking Spaces 579 561* Of which handicapped spaces 12 16 Loading spaces n/a# 0 Note: *This is the number of the existing parking spaces on the subject site as of 01/10/2007. There are no new spaces proposed on the subject site. Under the provisions of Section 27-445.10, if the subject site is qualified as a residential revitalization project, a reduction of the required parking spaces up to 30 percent is allowed. See the finding below for a detailed discussion of the parking reduction. There are no van accessible parking spaces for the handicapped identified in the parking calculation. A condition has been proposed in the recommendation section of this report to require the applicant to provide the breakdown of the parking calculation table prior to certification of the plans. #There was no loading space required when the site was developed in 1967. 3. Location: The subject site is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of 57 th Avenue and Annapolis Road (MD 450), on the west side of Baltimore Washington Parkway, in Planning Area 69 and Council District 5. 4. Surrounding Uses: The subject site is bounded on three sides by public rights-of-way. To the north of the property is the right-of-way of Annapolis Road; to the east of the property is the right-of-way of the Baltimore Washington Parkway; and to the west of the property is the right-of-way of 57 th Avenue. Across 57 th Avenue, further to the west, is Bladensburg High School. The property immediately adjacent to the subject site to the north is an existing multifamily subdivision in the R-10 Zone. 5. Previous Approvals: The subject site was zoned R-10 and was developed in 1967 with multifamily housing. The May 1994 Approved Master Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for Bladensburg-New Carrollton and Vicinity (Planning Area 69) retained the subject site in the R-10 Zone. The site also has two previously approved special exceptions. Special Exception SE-1943 is to use the property for the purpose of a medical practitioner s office and a retail sales and consumer service establishment (beauty shop), and SE-2436 is to use the property for the 2 DSP-08023

purpose of retail sales and consumer service establishment (valet drop off shop). The two special exceptions are no longer in operation. Since no additional exterior improvements are being proposed on the existing property, the site is exempt from the stormwater management requirements. 6. Design Features: The subject site has been improved with three ten-story multifamily apartment buildings. The site has two vehicular accesses from 57 th Avenue. The three multifamily buildings are surrounded by surface parking lots. There is one community center consisting of a swimming pool and a one-story bath house located in the eastern portion of the site. The proposed improvements in this DSP include the addition of 22 dwelling units in the three buildings and addition of an amenity space in the form of a fitness/community room in each of the three buildings. A police substation of approximately 621 square feet will be located within the existing Building 5802. Outside improvements included in this DSP are limited to the screening of the trash dumpster for each building. However, there is inconsistency in the number of dwelling units between the justification statement and site plan. The site plan shows 448 existing dwelling units, but the justification statement includes 447 dwelling units. A condition has been proposed in the recommendation section of this report requiring the applicant to address the inconsistent number of dwelling units prior to certification. In accordance with the current County regulations, all new dwelling units should be fully equipped with a fire suppression system built in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Standard 13D, and all applicable County laws and regulations. A condition to this effect has been proposed in the recommendation section of this report. COMPLIANCE WITH EVALUATION CRITERIA 7. Zoning Ordinance: The subject application has been reviewed for compliance with the requirements of the R-10 Zone, Residential Revitalization, and the site plan design guidelines of the Zoning Ordinance. a. The subject application is in conformance with the requirements of Section 27-441(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, which governs development in residential zones. The proposed additions in this DSP are permitted in the R-10 Zone. b. This detailed site plan is proposed in accordance with the zoning regulations of Section 27-445.10, Residential Revitalization, for the purpose of renovating unused portions of each of the three existing buildings to add additional dwelling units in order to provide housing for low-to-moderate income residents of the county. Section 27-445.10 has the following requirements: (a) Applicability. (1) Residential Revitalization, as defined in this Subtitle and permitted in the Table of Uses in Part 5, shall be limited to any form of existing multifamily or attached one-family dwelling units that are located in a Revitalization Tax Credit District. (2) This section is not applicable to any property not currently developed with existing attached or multifamily dwelling units. 3 DSP-08023

Comment: The proposed development is an existing multifamily project located in an existing Revitalization Tax Credit District. This application is not to alter the building envelope, but to revitalize existing space that has been derelict and abandoned and install new windows and doors. (b) Requirements. (1) Existing dwelling units as described in (a)(1) of this Section may be replaced by proposed multifamily, attached one-family or detached one-family dwelling units in a Residential Revitalization project. (2) The existing dwelling units as described in (b)(1) above shall have a minimum density of twelve (12) units per acre of the net lot or tract area. (3) The number, location, and design of compact and standard parking spaces shown on the approved Detailed Site Plan shall constitute the parking design regulations for the development. (4) Regulations concerning the height of structures, lot size and coverage, frontage, setbacks, density, bedroom percentages and other requirements of the specific zone do not apply to uses and structures in a Residential Revitalization project. The dimensions and percentages shown on the approved Detailed Site Plan shall constitute the development regulations. (5) The normal parking requirement shall be reduced by thirty percent (30%). An additional reduction may be allowed upon a determination that: (A) (B) An additional reduction is necessary to alleviate conditions that are particular to the proposed use, given its nature at this location, or to alleviate conditions which are prevalent in older areas of the County which were predominately developed prior to November 29, 1949; and The additional reduction will not infringe upon the parking and loading needs of adjacent residential areas. (6) The project shall comply with the requirements of the Landscape Manual to the extent that is practical. Comment: No replacement of units is proposed. The application is for the addition of 22 dwelling units and a police substation to the unused portions of the three existing multifamily buildings. The gross density of the development with the addition of 22 dwelling units will be approximately 50.4 dwelling units per acre. The DSP includes limited exterior improvements. The DSP has requested approximately a ten percent 4 DSP-08023

reduction from the number of required parking spaces, a percentage much lower than the maximum allowed 30 percent. No additional reduction in the number of parking spaces has been requested with this DSP. The DSP is exempt from the requirements of the Prince George s County Landscape Manual due to the minimal impact of the proposed improvements on the site. There is one trash pad per building along with multiple dumpsters, which are screened with sight-tight galvanized steel fences in accordance with Section 4.4 Screening Requirements. (c) Findings. In approving a Residential Revitalization project, the Planning Board shall find that the project: (1) Improves a deteriorated or obsolete multifamily or attached onefamily dwelling unit development by replacing or rehabilitating dwellings, improving structures, or renovating and improving other facilities; Comment: The DSP proposes to improve the existing multifamily development by rehabilitating and renovating the lower floor of the buildings into 22 dwelling units. Additional rehabilitation proposed in this DSP is a police substation in Building 5802 and an amenity space in the form of a fitness/community room in each of the three buildings. The building spaces where the 22 units will be added have been vacant and derelict for over 15 years and have been a gathering place for vermin, pests and mold. The DSP would enable the owner to correct the mechanical deficiencies of the existing buildings and bring the lower-level spaces back to life in the form of rentable units and supporting space. (2) Maintains or improves the architectural character of the buildings so that they are compatible with surrounding properties; Comment: This application maintains the architectural character of the existing buildings which are compatible with surrounding properties. (3) Serves a need for housing in the neighborhood or community; Comment: This application will serve a housing need in the neighborhood as the new units proposed in this DSP are specifically designated to meet this need. The DSP will add 22 new residential units to the neighborhood housing stock. (4) Benefits project residents and property owners in the neighborhood; Comment: The new units will be a benefit to the project residents and property owners in the neighborhood by providing new and additional housing specifically for residents of the neighborhood. (5) Conforms with the housing goals and priorities as described in the current Housing and Community Development Consolidated Plan, for Prince George s County; and Comment: According to the applicant, the development team has been working with the County to implement this residential revitalization project. This DSP application 5 DSP-08023

conforms to the housing goals and priorities as described in the current Housing and Community Development Consolidated Plan. (6) Conforms to either specific land use recommendations or principles and guidelines for residential development within the applicable Master Plan. Comment: The application conforms to the land use recommendations and guidelines of the applicable master plan. c. The DSP shows a site layout that is consistent with the R-10 regulations as modified by Section 27-445.10, Residential Revitalization. The DSP is also in conformance with the applicable site design guidelines. 8. Prince George s County Landscape Manual: The proposed addition of 22 dwelling units and a police substation involves only limited site improvements and does not increase the gross floor area of the existing buildings by more than ten percent. Therefore, the subject DSP is exempt from the requirements of the landscape manual. 9. Woodland Conservation and Tree Preservation Ordinance: This property is not subject to the provisions of the Prince George s County Woodland Conservation and Tree Preservation Ordinance until such time as the cumulative woodland disturbance exceeds 5,000 square feet during any five year period or the site is required to go through the subdivision process. A numbered exemption for a specific activity letter has been approved for this site and is valid through October 25, 2009. 10. Referral Comments: The subject application was referred to the concerned agencies and divisions. The referral comments are summarized as follows: a. The Community Planning Division, in a memorandum dated August 25, 2008, stated that the application is consistent with the 2002 Prince George s County Approved General Plan Development Pattern policies for the Developed Tier and is in conformance with the high urban residential land use recommendations of the 1994 Approved Master Plan and Sectional Map Amendment for Bladensburg-New Carrollton and Vicinity (Planning Area 69). b. The Subdivision Section, in a memorandum dated August 7, 2008, noted that the property was the subject of record plat WWW56@33 approved by the Planning Board in 1965. Since there are no new lots being created and no changes to the gross floor area of the existing buildings in this development, the site is exempt from the Subdivision Regulations. c. The Transportation Planning Section, in a memorandum dated July 18, 2008, indicated that because no new construction is proposed and no underlying approvals restrict the development density of this site from the standpoint of transportation planning, the DSP is acceptable. In a separate memorandum from the Transportation Planning Section dated September 8, 2008, on detailed site plan review for master plan trail compliance, the trail coordinator noted that there are no master plan trail recommendations that impact this DSP. 6 DSP-08023

d. The Environmental Planning Section, in a memorandum dated May 10, 2008, had no comments on this DSP because the site is exempt from the Prince George s Woodland Conservation and Tree Preservation Ordinance. e. The Permit Section, in a memorandum dated August 11, 2008, provided three comments on this DSP. The reviewer also notes that there are two special exceptions approved on the subject site. Comment: In a letter dated September 8, 2008 (Rice to Zhang), Federal Capital Partners, property manager of the subject site, confirmed that the two special exceptions, SE-1943 and SE-2436, approved on the subject site for uses of a medical practitioner s office, beauty salon and valet drop off shop are no longer in operation. However, this information is not reflected on the site plan. A condition has been proposed in the recommendation section of this report to require a site plan note to that effect be placed on the site plan. f. The Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR), in a memorandum dated July 21, 2008, stated that they had no comment on this DSP. g. The Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC), in a memorandum dated August 18, 2008, noted that an existing 12-inch sewer main transverses the property and the site has existing water and sewer connections to 57 th Avenue. h. The Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPW&T) had not responded to the referral request at time the staff report was written. i. The Department of Housing and Community Development had not responded to the referral request at time the staff report was written. 11. As required by Section 27-285(b) of the Zoning Ordinance, the detailed site plan represents a reasonable alternative for satisfying the site design guidelines and residential revitalization requirements of Subtitle 27, Part 3, Division 9, of the Prince George s County Code without requiring unreasonable cost and without detracting substantially from the utility of the proposed development for its intended use. RECOMMENDATION Based upon the foregoing evaluation and analysis, the Urban Design Section recommends that the Planning Board adopt the findings of this report and APPROVE Detailed Site Plan DSP-08023 for Park Place Towers (The Phoenix), subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to certificate approval of this detailed site plan, the applicant shall: a. Add a site plan note indicating that the previously approved special exceptions on this site are no longer in operation. b. Revise the parking calculation table to provide the information of the van-accessible parking spaces for the physically handicapped. 7 DSP-08023

c. Address the inconsistency in the number of dwelling units. 2. All new dwelling units shall be fully equipped with a fire suppression system built in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), Standard 13D, and all applicable County laws and regulations. 8 DSP-08023