COLUMBIA COUNTY EVENTS CENTER PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT (FINAL)

Similar documents
Columbia County Events Center. Planning Committee Report October 9, 2012

CHAPTER NINE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT

Capital Revenue Projections Presented to the Finance Committee May 31, 2008

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis

BUSINESS INCENTIVES POLICY June 17, 2008

1. Make the following projections by year, including the first and last year in which any construction and/or development takes place:

The Economic & Fiscal Impacts of the Blanche Hotel Redevelopment Project

13.1% over Cash Balance Brought Forward $12,877,300 Taxes Other Revenues Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources

Okaloosa County BCC. Okaloosa County BCC. MSBU / MSTU Policy. Municipal Service Benefit Units Municipal Service Taxing Units.

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

Mr. Lukasik summarized the proposed FY General Fund and Country Club budgets. The following items were reviewed:

PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY. September 10, 2013 [ ] Consent [X] Regular [ ] Ordinance [ ] Public Hearing

Development Opportunity: Priority Development Site

APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION PROGRAM

IC Chapter 15. Public Safety Communications Systems and Computer Facilities Districts

ESCAMBIA COUNTY MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFITS UNITS GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

QUESTION 11 - REVENUE GENERATION SUMMARY

EXHIBIT E LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

Volusia County School Board, FL

Westside Community Development District Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2018

Fiscal Year 2017 BUDGET

Ann Item # AGENDA MEMORANDUM

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

CODING: Words stricken are deletions; words underlined are additions. hb er

Goals and Policies Concerning Use of MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982

Sincerely, Meda11ion,zne. Bemff. enclosure. P.S. On a personal note, I d like to wish you a Happy Thanksgiving and Holiday Season.

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY AND DISCLOSURE REPORT

Palm Beach County FY 2018 Proposed Budget

Gardnerville Parking District Strategy

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

BASTROP COUNTY TAX ABATEMENT POLICY. (Guidelines and Procedures)

Regular Agenda Public Hearing D

Metropolitan Council. Item: Meeting date: December 11, 2013

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC FORM 8-K/A

2019 9% Competitive Housing Credit Application

Resume Excerpts from the Escambia Board of County Commissioners Meeting held on 09/09/1996

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 16, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. 35. Public Hearing [t(" Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda D

RESOLUTION NO

MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT (MSBU) CREATION AND ADMINISTRATION POLICY 16-01

Citizens Land Bank Center for Economic and Social Justice

Middle Village Community Development District

Understanding Mississippi Property Taxes

MECKLENBURG MANOR APARTMENTSs A 51 UNIT MULTI-FAMILY INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY 719 EAST FERRELL STREET, SOUTH HILL, VIRGINIA 23970

PRELIMINARY PROJECT PLAN AND REINVESTMENT ZONE FINANCING PLAN FOR PROPOSED TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NO. 1, CITY OF OAK RIDGE NORTH

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 447

POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES October 2018

Great Hwy Frontage in Growing Area 3752 W US Hwy 90, Lake City, FL

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Managing Division / Dept: Office of Management & Budget

0,...0 Los Angeles W orld Airports

CITY OF TACOMA HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2012 APPLICATION SUPPLEMENTAL FORM

Overview of Public Improvement Districts (PIDs)

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT & VETERANS AFFAIRS ANALYSIS LOCAL LEGISLATION

Sample Engagement Letter

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

NC General Statutes - Chapter 116 Article 21B 1

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: Our website is changing! Please click here for details.

Waters Edge Community Development District

Waters Edge Community Development District

II. NEBRASKA INVESTMENT FINANCE AUTHORITY (NIFA) LOW INCOME HOUSING TAX CREDIT PROGRAM ALLOCATION PLAN

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Planning and Development

OFFERING MEMORANDUM FOR SALE. Presented By: 5307 N Belt Hwy, St. Joseph, MO 64507

A SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS OF CHAPTER 23L. William F. Griffin, Jr. Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C.

NC STATE UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIP CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORT. JUNE 30, 2016 and 2015

POLK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 7065

THE IMPACT OF REAL ESTATE ON THE FLORIDA ECONOMY. --UPDATE FOR (Using Roll Year 2002 Property Appraiser Data)

Yorklyn Village Market Study and Economic Analysis: Executive Summary Yorklyn Village, Delaware

FACT SHEET MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT (MSBU) CREATION AND IMPLEMENTATION

Broward County Civic Arena. County Commission Workshop October 20, 2015

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: December 19, 2014 REPORT NO: HCR Chair and Members of the San Diego Housing Commission For the Agenda of January 16, 2015

TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: DISCUSSION ITEM

Subpart A - GENERAL ORDINANCES Chapter 66 - TAXATION ARTICLE V. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION

Land and Technology. Citizens Land Bank. P.O. Box Washington, D.C

JEFFERSON COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA EMERGENCY AMBULANCE SERVICE FEE ORDINANCE. Table of Contents

CITY OF JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

OFFERING MEMORANDUM. STORAGE DIRECT MARANA 7020 North Camino Martin, Tucson, Arizona SELF STORAGE A DVISORY GROUP

City of South Daytona Municipalization Evaluation. December 19, 2006 WHH Enterprises, Inc.

ANNUAL LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVENUE ANALYSIS OF THE 13 th FLOOR INVESTMENTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN TAMARAC, FLORIDA

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD NO (West Lake Elsinore Public Improvements)

Economic Impact Analysis. Prepared By: Lambert Advisory 2601 South Bayshore Drive Miami, Florida 33133

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF A SPECIAL TAX FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO OF THE TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD (Rosetta Canyon Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

ORDINANCE NO

SERVICE & IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ASSESSMENT PLAN:

Summary. Draft Redevelopment Plan Summary Flowery Branch Tax Allocation District # 1:

NON-BINDING TERM SHEET FOR OMNIBUS AGREEMENT FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION AQUARIUM PROJECT BETWEEN MOTE MARINE LABORATORY, INC. AND SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA

REPORT. DATE ISSUED: February 3, 2006 ITEM 103. Loan to San Diego Youth and Community Services for Transitional Housing (Council District 3)

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Page No. MSBU Background Highlights 1. General Guidelines 4. Detailed Procedures: Construction Districts 13

FIRE DISTRICTS FUND. The Fire Districts Fund consists of primarily one funding source: property taxes (ad valorem revenue).

Town of Littleton Sale of Town Owned Property Policy & Procedure

MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Progress Report

HIGHLANDS COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR ERIC T. ZWAYER. Eric T. Zwayer Tax Collector Serving Highlands County

Perry Farm Development Co.

Transcription:

COLUMBIA COUNTY EVENTS CENTER PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT (FINAL) OCTOBER 9, 2012 1

INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide both elected officials and citizens with the information necessary to make an informed decision on the feasibility of constructing an Events Center for Columbia County. In order to protect the integrity of the information provided; reliable, competent consultants were used to supply data where needed. Where possible, data extracted from current (2012) demographics was used. Also, the use of economic multiples (7x) to determine economic impacts and the buy-down of costs with grants and/or outside contributions was avoided. It was the intent of the committee to provide realistic facts pertaining to the cost and financing of the project and to eliminate assumptions. 2

PROJECT HISTORY In FY 10/11 County Commissioner Jody DuPree was appointed by the Chair of the Tourist Development Council (TDC) to chair a fact finding committee on the benefits of an Events Center and the enhancement of recreational facilities for tournament play to Columbia County and its tourism efforts. On July 20, 2011, the Committee presented its findings on the Events Center and Sports Tournaments to the TDC. The Committee found the following facts related to an Events Center: (1) The ideal situation is to acquire large acreage with interstate frontage. a. Interstate frontage is critical to successful centers as it creates a presence and an awareness of the facility. b. Land is less expensive before beginning operations. c. The acquisition of additional acreage up front prevents the center from becoming land locked and allows for future expansion at a lower cost. d. A campus setting with multiple buildings allows for multiple events to occur simultaneously with modest additional cost. e. Larger acreage is needed for events such as RV shows. Some facilities supply RV spaces with water/ sewer/electric hookups to support events such as dog shows, etc. 3

f. Parking is a major concern and requires adequate space. (2) Facilities need to be designed for multi-purpose events and not be limited to a conference or convention center. a. Buildings should use free span construction and be designed to allow for future expansion. Buildings should be clustered. b. Electrical grids should be placed in flooring. This allows flexibility in event planning. c. High end finishes are not needed for all facilities. d. All facilities should have redundancy built into their systems such as HVAC and sound. i. If a system fails, the events can continue and the facility will have fewer cancellations. ii. iii. iv. Systems, like HVAC, should be located outside event space so that maintenance and repairs will not impact events. Buildings should use separate smaller systems so that spaces can be isolated. The facility could then heat or cool only what space is necessary. Zone sound systems can be designed for multiple events in one building. 4

(3) These facilities are seldom self supporting and will require financial assistance; however, most events should be structured to cover their cost. a. Of the facilities visited, outside funding was used to pay for the facility construction costs. Only operating expenses were paid from usage fees and bed taxes. i. The best management only provided 75% to 80% return on operating expenses. ii. The most successful facilities utilized fairs to generate a large portion of their annual revenue. b. One day events do not cover costs unless rates are increased. The expenses are in set up and tear down of one day events. c. Outdoor only events, such as car shows, are not as profitable for a facility; however, they still benefit the local economy. d. All facilities should measure the economic impact of each facility event on the community. e. Targeted marketing is more effective than running ads. i. Marketing staff should measure the results of their advertising campaigns to see what works. ii. Recruiting events that have a good fit for the facility and mission is necessary. 5

iii. Marketing staff should not over book events. If an event occurs too frequently, the event will have a smaller draw. As the TDC chose to pursue sports tournament improvements, the Columbia County Board of County Commissioners appointed a new committee to complete research on the feasibility of an Events Center on October 6, 2011. The Committee s objective was to examine the feasibility and costs of such a facility in Columbia County. In researching an Events Center, the Committee examined several different locations. Committee members visited centers in Hattiesburg, Mississippi; Valdosta, Georgia; Perry, Georgia; and Osceola County, Florida. Other sites in Jacksonville, Lakeland, and Volusia County provided additional information. Along with financial information, the Committee was looking for what worked at each facility and what they would change. Committee members developed a conceptual plan for the types of facilities that would be needed to support an agriculture centered complex and support non-agricultural events and meeting space as well. The Committee invited board members from Columbia County Resources, Inc. (CCR) to join and assist in revising the conceptual plans to improve the functionality of a potential facility. A Request for Proposals (RFP) was issued to identify potential sites for an Events Center and to determine a reasonable cost for land and site work budgets. 6

THE PROJECT Based upon the data and facts obtained by the Columbia County Events Center Planning Committee, the desired project would be inclusive of the following: The site would be a minimum of 200 acres with interstate frontage. The site would have access to public utilities with the ability to create adequate ingress and egress. The building would be multi-purpose in design and contain approximately 250,000 s.f.. The project would require a strong governance plan. The project must be done in cooperation with Columbia County Resources, Inc. (owners and operators of the Columbia County fairgrounds). A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Columbia County and Columbia County Resources, Inc. is in the process of being finalized by attorneys representing both Columbia County and Columbia County Resources, Inc. Subject to the approval by the CCR Board of Directors and completion of the Events Center Project, the land of Columbia County Resources, Inc. would transfer to Columbia County. This land is then available for sale and/or development and provide both a direct and indirect financial impact. 7

DIRECT/INDIRECT BENEFITS (FROM MOU WITH COLUMBIA COUNTY RESOURCES, INC.) The current Columbia County Resources, Inc. (CCR) campus consists of 82.56 acres. It is proposed that this acreage would be sold. Based upon the fair market value established by the office of the Columbia County Property Appraiser, the land value is $4,641,212 or $56,216 per acre. This sale is a direct benefit to the Events Center project. 100% of land sale proceeds can be allocated to the cost of the Events Center. The indirect benefit from the sale of the Columbia County Resources, Inc. campus results from the development of the land after the sale. The indirect benefit can be measured in both new ad valorem taxes generated and new jobs created. The new ad valorem taxes generated was determined by using an average of the actual Columbia County tax roll for like and similar properties. Based on the average, the new ad valorem taxes generated would be calculated as follows: Total property value (target area) $157,507,404 Total acreage (target area) 593 Average property value per acre $ 265,611 $265,611 (average property value within target area per acre) X 82.56 acres (total acres in Columbia County Resources, Inc. campus) X 16.8033 (total county millage) = $368,477. 8

The new jobs created was calculated based upon the assumption that the currently vacant 82.56 acres will eventually be developed into commercial buildings with attendant employees. The following table, which was developed from like and similar properties in Columbia County assumes the location of the following businesses on the property: Units Total Jobs Merchandise Super Centers 2 1,000 Hotels 3 160 Restaurants 5 600 1,760 COLUMBIA COUNTY EVENTS CENTER PROJECT ESTIMATED JOBS CREATED BY DEVELOPMENT OF CCR PROPERTY SUPER CENTER HOTEL RESTAURANT TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 220,000 45,000 7,500 ACRES 23 3 3 EMPLOYEES 500 40 120 NUMBER PROJECTED 2 4 5 TOTAL EMPLOYEES 1,000 160 600 1,760 AVERAGE ANNUAL WAGE $ 19,000 $ 20,000 $ 18,000 TOTAL ANNUAL WAGES $ 19,000,000 $ 3,200,000 $ 10,800,000 $ 33,000,000 TOTAL ACRES 46 12 15 73 TOTAL SQUARE FEET 440,000 180,000 37,500 $ 657,500 It is assumed that a different mix of potential businesses would generate at least the same approximate total jobs and annual wages. 9

DIRECT/INDIRECT BENEFITS (Columbia County Events Center) The benefits of building and operating an events center was determined by utilizing the services of Brian Richard, Ph.D. Dr. Richard is currently Assistant Professor in the Department of Economic and Workforce Development at the University of Southern Mississippi. Dr. Richard prepared a report entitled Potential Economic Impacts of a Proposed Multipurpose Facility in Columbia County, Florida. The direct benefit of an Events Center would be the creation of additional tax revenue. In year three (3), the additional sales tax revenue (excluding ½ cent sales tax distributions) is estimated to be $46,562. In year three (3), the additional bed tax revenue (based on 3%) is estimated to be $25,000. The indirect benefit of an Events Center is the creation of jobs. The estimated number of new jobs (not Events Center related) is projected to be 79. These 79 new jobs are estimated to generate $1,587,634 in wage income. Other indirect benefits of building and operating an events center have been identified as follows: (1) Will build an identity for Lake City/Columbia County (similar to the impact the National Georgia Fairgrounds has had on Perry, Georgia) (2) Will provide the local community with a venue to hold events that are too large for community centers. (3) Will provide the Tourist Development Council with a venue to book shows, conventions and meetings. 10

(4) Secondary development will occur in the vicinity of the Events Center generating $4.6 million in annual expenditures (based on the Richard report) 11

PROJECT REVIEW Information and research performed in determining the feasibility of constructing an Events Center for Columbia County has resulted in the following: (1) An Events Center would create an identity for Lake City/Columbia County while providing a venue to hold large events including, but not limited to shows, conventions and meetings. (2) The Center, as part of its governance plan, would assume ownership and control of the properties currently owned by Columbia County Resources, Inc. (3) The known direct benefits of constructing an Events Center include, but are not limited to the following: a. Provides approximately $4.6 million in revenue from the sale of property currently owned by Columbia County Resources, Inc. b. Provides an economic impact of approximately $71,000 in new tax revenue annually to the community through event bookings (4) The known indirect benefits of constructing an Events Center include, but are not limited to the following: a. $368,477 in annual estimated ad valorem taxes from the development of properties currently owned by Columbia County Resources, Inc. 12

b. 79 new jobs created from the Events Center with total estimated wages of $1,587,634. c. 1,760 new jobs created from the full development of the current Columbia County Resources, Inc. campus with total estimated wages of $33,000.000. d. Would generate secondary development in the vicinity of the Events Center. 13

PROJECT DESCRIPTION The architectural firm of Clemons, Rutherford and Associates was selected to provide a preliminary design for an Events Center. The firm will provide a presentation on the project description. Images are attached to provide a general description of the project. 14

PICTURE 1 15

2 16

3 17

4 18

5 19

6 20

7 21

PROJECT COST AND FINANCING The estimated cost of the facility is as follows: Land, 200 acres $ 4,000,000 * Site development 2,500,000 Main building 13,000,000 Secondary buildings 7,300,000 Walkways 480,000 Contingency 1,000,000 $ 28,280,000 In conjunction with this project, the Columbia County Resources, Inc. (CCR) will donate 82 acres of its commercial property to Columbia County. This property will be subsequently sold by the County to provide funds to defray the cost of the project, as well as foster economic growth. The estimated proceeds for the sale of this property is $4,600,000, using current tax roll values. FINANCING PLAN The proposed capital financing plan for this project is as follows: 1. Bank loan, 3 year term $ 6,000,000 2. Bond issue, 35 year term 23,680,000 $ 29,680,000 * based on industry average as a specific site has not been identified. 22

Bank Loan - $6,000,000 The bank loan will be secured to provide funds to purchase the land and provide funds for initial planning and site development. It is anticipated that the terms of this loan will require interest only at 3% annually with repayment in full when the acquired property from CCR is sold. Bond Issue - $23,680,000 A revenue bond issue will be let by Columbia County to provide longterm financing for the development of the project. It is anticipated that the bond issue will have a term of 35 years with interest at 3.5%. There will be a provision for early payoff after approximately 10 years. The pledged revenue for this bond issue will be the County s share of the Small County Surtax and the levy of the 4th Cent Tourist Development Tax as provided by Section 125.0104(3)(2)(d) Florida Statutes. The actual funds for repayment of the bonds will be equivalent tax funds from businesses that have received tax abatements as these funds become available to the County under the various economic development agreements. OPERATIONS It is anticipated that the development period will encompass approximately two years and be concluded by September, 2014. During this period there will be an additional required subsidy from County reserves to fully pay the debt service payments on the acquired debt. This subsidy should be no more than $2,000,000 in total during the first five years, and be eliminated thereafter. 23

ATTACHMENTS The following attached schedules show the details of the financing plan: A. Events Center Financing Options B. Debt Service Revenues Analysis C. Cash Flow Analysis 24

ATTACHMENT A COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA EVENTS CENTER FINANCING OPTIONS ESTIMATED CAPITAL COSTS: LAND COST- 200 ACRES $ 4,000,000 SITE DEVELOPMENT 2,500,000 MAIN BUILDING 13,000,000 SECONDARY BUILDINGS 7,300,000 CONNECTING WALKWAYS 480,000 CONTINGENCIES 1,000,000 28,280,000 LESS CONTRIBUTION - COL. CO. RESOURCES, INC. (4,600,000) NET TO BE FINANCED $ 23,680,000 FINANCING AT 3.5% FINANCED AMOUNT ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE 30 YRS 35 YRS 40 YRS* $ 23,680,000 $ 1,281,346 $ 1,178,756 $ 1,104,478 24,000,000 1,298,560 1,194,688 1,119,404 25,000,000 1,352,668 1,244,464 1,166,046 28,000,000 1,514,980 1,393,800 1,305,972 30,000,000 1,623,202 1,493,358 1,399,254 *This term would only be possible if funding can be obtained from U.S. Department of Agriculture under its Rural Development loan program 25

ATTACHMENT B COLUMBIA COUNTY EVENTS CENTER PROJECT DEBT SERVICE REVENUES ANALYSIS TAX ABATED COMPANY EXEMPTION END TAXABLE VALUE 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 TARGET REAL PROPERTY 2018 $ 42,390,690 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 339,761 PERSONAL PROPERTY 2014 41,724,075-334,418 334,418 334,418 334,418 334,418 334,418 TAXES HUNTER PANELS REAL PROPERTY 2015 7,790,573-31,220 31,220 62,441 62,441 62,441 62,441 PERSONAL PROPERTY 2010 2,618,521 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 20,987 NEW MILLENNIUM REAL PROPERTY 2016 11,944,473-95,735 95,735 95,735 95,735 95,735 95,735 PERSONAL PROPERTY 2011 11,610,597 93,058 93,058 93,058 93,058 93,058 93,058 93,058 FAIRGROUNDS PROPERTY 114,045 575,418 575,418 606,639 606,639 606,639 946,400 REAL PROPERTY - COUNTY ONLY 2013 6,600,000-53,790 53,790 53,790 53,790 53,790 53,790 TOTALS $ 114,045 $ 629,208 $ 629,208 $ 660,429 $ 660,429 $ 660,429 $ 1,000,190 26

ATTACHMENT C COLUMBIA COUNTY EVENTS CENTER PROJECT CASH FLOW ANALYSIS 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 TOTAL BEGINNING CASH $ - $ 11,054,045 $ 3,789,496 $ 4,137 $ 47,492 $ 90,137 $ - EXPENDITURES LAND PURCHASE $ 4,000,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 4,000,000 SITE DEVELOPMENT 2,500,000 - - - - 2,500,000 CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES 12,000,000 9,780,000 - - - - 21,780,000 PERSONAL SERVICES - 100,000 530,600 558,236 564,477 581,400 2,334,713 OPERATING EXPENSES 20,000 50,000 1,085,294 1,125,081 1,166,550 1,190,260 4,637,185 OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY - - 25,000 10,000 25,000 10,000 70,000 DEBT SERVICE- INTEREST 60,000 999,560 866,878 793,748 780,155 766,082 4,266,423 DEBT SERVICE PRINCIPAL - 359,197 6,371,879 385,009 398,602 412,675 7,927,362 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 18,580,000 11,288,757 8,879,651 2,872,074 2,934,784 2,960,417 47,515,683 REVENUES/ RECEIPTS SALE OF LAND - 2,400,000 2,200,000 - - - 4,600,000 LOAN PROCEEDS 6,000,000 - - - - - 6,000,000 TOURIST DEVELOPMENT TAX- 1 CENT 110,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 215,000 1,185,000 TAX ABATEMENT FUNDS 114,045 629,208 629,208 660,429 660,429 1,000,190 3,693,509 BOND PROCEEDS 23,200,000 - - - - 23,200,000 INTEREST EARNINGS 210,000 130,000 50,000 10,000 2,000 1,000 403,000 EVENT CENTER REVENUES - 50,000 1,400,084 1,630,000 1,700,000 1,800,000 6,580,084 SUBSIDY FROM COUNTY - 600,000 600,000 400,000 400,000-2,000,000 TOTAL REVENUES/ RECEIPTS 29,634,045 4,024,208 5,094,292 2,915,429 2,977,429 3,016,190 47,661,593 EXCESS REVENUES OVER EXPENDITURES $ 11,054,045 $ (7,264,549) $ (3,785,359) $ 43,355 $ 42,645 $ 55,773 $ 145,910 NOTES: Event Center revenues and expenses derived from pro-forma report by SMG dated September 18, 2012. 27

PROJECT OPERATING COST SMG, an entertainment and convention venue management company provided the following projected net operating cost for the proposed Event Center: YEAR 1 $ (240,810) YEAR 2 $ (58,712) YEAR 3 $ 117,576 28

PROJECT GOVERNANCE The Columbia County Events Center Planning Committee finds the following regarding a governance plan should an Events Center be approved for construction: (1) The Board of County Commissioners would appoint a Columbia County Events Center Board of Directors. (2) The Events Center Board of Directors would be organized as a 501(c) (6) community/civic organization. (non-profit federally tax exempt) (3) The County would lease the Events Center to the 501(c)(6) organization. (4) The Events Center would operate as an enterprise fund. (5) The County, through the Clerk of Courts, would maintain financial records. 29

FINAL PROJECT REVIEW Information and research performed in determining the feasibility of constructing an Events Center for Columbia County has resulted in the following: (1) An Events Center would create an identity for Lake City/Columbia County while providing a venue for shows, conventions and meetings. (2) The Events Center would create direct economic benefits of $4.6 million from the sale of property currently owned by Columbia County Resources, Inc. and $71,000 in new tax revenue. (3) The Events Center would create indirect economic benefits of $368,477 in advalorem taxes from the development of property currently owned by Columbia County Resources, Inc. and 1,839 new jobs. (4) An Events Center would consist of 250,000 s.f. and cost $28,280,000. (5) The financing plan for the Events Center does not include direct (other than revenue generated from the sale of land) or indirect revenues generated by the facility. The financing plan does not require the levy of additional ad valorem taxes. In addition, the financing plan does not assume the receipt of grants and/or outside contributions (6) The financing plan is largely based on the capture of ad valorem taxes that have been or will be generated from economic development projects that benefited from tax abatement. (7) A strong governance organization is required. 30

NEXT STEPS The Columbia County Events Center Planning Committee would like to request that the Board of County Commissioners, at their earliest convenience approve the following next steps in order that the project can proceed to the next phase. (1) Establish an Events Center Board of Directors (2) Prepare a draft governance plan (3) Select a designated engineer/architect for the project (4) Develop a financing plan for the project (5) Begin property negotiations with the various property owners that responded to the Request for Proposals (RFP) (6) Prepare to levy the additional 1% bed tax 31