Lee County Board Of County Commissioners DATE CRITICAL Agenda Item Summary

Similar documents
LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE 08-24

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

5:mJ k!! 5. Meeting Date: January 23, 2007

ORDINANCE 93-7 "EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE"

LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Article 6 - IMPACT FEES BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NUMBER 995

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, in Chapter 166 Municipalities, Florida Statutes, the Florida State

LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO

GLADES COUNTY, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NO

LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 02-34

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-

Temporary Housing Ordinance Attachment. Draft 3, 11/05/10 ORDINANCE NO.

PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY. September 10, 2013 [ ] Consent [X] Regular [ ] Ordinance [ ] Public Hearing

PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR EXPENDITURE OF REVENUE; PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

(Ord. No , 1, )

ORDINANCE NO

PROPOSED INCLUSIONARY ORDINANCE

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 4-D

within the City of Bonita Springs Land Development

CHAPTER CAPITAL FACILITIES, FEES, AND INCENTIVES RELATED TO FEES. B. Fire Combat and Rescue Service Impact Fee Study and Modifications

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

Ordinance No. WHEREAS, in RCW the Legislature has authorized counties to adopt an ordinance imposing impact fees; and

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Lee County, Florida, has adopted a comprehensive Land Development Code (LDC); and,

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

and ORDINANCE NO. ----

WALK ON John J. Fredyma

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OVIEDO, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

5:oEjdz. x Public h'bf. v DATE CRITICAL - _~

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 16, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. 35. Public Hearing [t(" Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda D

CITY OF MARCO ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 14-

ORDINANCE NO Page 1 of7. Ordinance 2866 April 13, 2010 April 27, 2010

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

LEE COUNTY RESOLUTION NO.

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

ORDINANCE NO

CS for CP0004, Second Engrossed 07-08

Oregon Statutes Relevant to Quiet Water Home Owners Association

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO P 39a/12-16(klk)

COLUMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA ORDINANCE NO

WHEREAS, it has been the policy of the City of San Diego that new non-residential

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

RESOLUTION NO

City of Titusville "Gateway to Nature and Space"

Section 150, Impact Fees, Pinellas County Land Development Code

TO ADDRESS THE PRESERVATION OF PROPERTY FORMERLY ZONED HOLDING IN

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Joaquin ordains as follows:

ORDINANCE 495 CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT AND PROPORTIONATE FAIR-SHARE MITIGATION TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIHPRHA, Pub. L. No , Title VI (1990), codified at 12 U.S.C et seq.

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SPRING HILL MUNICIPAL CODE, CHAPTER 5, IMPACT FEE-PURPOSES AND ADMINISTRATION

CHAPTER House Bill No. 963

ORDINANCE NO

C(PD. Ordinance Admin. Code Other. 1 - Di~sig:

CHAPTER 8 - INDEX. Chapter 8 Development Exactions and Impacts Fees

NASSAU COUNTY, FLORIDA MOBILITY FEE ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO provides that historic preservation ad valorem tax exemptions may be granted only by ordinance of the county; and

TRANSPORTATION AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPACT FEES

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Adoption of Transferable Development Rights Land Development

ORDINANCE NO. THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. 04- NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NAPLES, FLORIDA:

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, periodically the Conservation, Development and Planning Department

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE FOREST CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A HOUSING TRUST FUND BOARD

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MACUNGIE LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. ORDINANCE NO [To be considered for Adoption June 1, 2017]

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the County Council desires to amend the current Code of

-REQUESTED: Approve the Resolution of Necessity for the acquisition and condemnation of parcels required for the Matlacha Park Expansion Project.

ARTICLE 13 IMPACT FEES

City of Sunny Isles Beach Collins Avenue Sunny Isles Beach, Florida 33160

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

EXHIBIT G. Exhibit G - Page 1 RVPUB/MO/655751

Agenda Item#: 5A-2. I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions:

Commissioners to enact, amend, and enforce technical construction and building codes; and,

'fr::,3 =====================================================================

ORDINANCE NO BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF WACO, McLENNAN COUNTY, TEXAS:

ORDINANCE NO

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CITY OF LIVE OAK, CALIFORNIA

City of Brisbane Agenda Report

4. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Public hearing on revisions to Accessory Dwelling Unit Standards in the Land Development Code LEGISLATIVE

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED NOVEMBER 26, 2018

MEMORANDUM. From: Michael McMahon, Community & Economic Development Director

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH. WHEREAS the City of Guelph will experience growth through development and redevelopment;

ORDINANCE NO. ORD ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA AMENDING TITLE 20

ORDINANCE NO.1 4. and. Page 1

F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Item 10C 1 of 69

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING AND SUPPLEMENTING THE REVISED GENERAL ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF BAYONNE THE, CHAPTER 33 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

TOWNSHIP OF EAST HEMPFIELD. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania ORDINANCE NO.

AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET

ORDINANCE NO

The City Council makes the following findings:

Transcription:

Lee County Board Of County Commissioners DATE CRITICAL Agenda Item Summary Blue Sheet No. 1. ACTION REQUESTED/PURPOSE: Conduct a public hearing; adopt an ordinance amending the Land Development Code to update the Road Impact Fee Regulations set forth in Chapter 2 of the Code. 2. FUNDING SOURCE: N/A 3. WHAT ACTION ACCOMPLISHES: Satisfies statutory requirement to hold a public hearing to adopt an ordinance that does not affect the list of permitted uses within a zoning district. If adopted, the Ordinance will establish a new fee schedule for road impact fees and amend Chapter 2 of the Code. 4. MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Ordinance 5. Departmental Category: County Attorney 6. Meeting Date: June 14, 2011 7. Agenda: 8. Requirement/Purpose: (specify) 9. Request Initiated: X Consent X Statute 125.66 (2)(a), F.S. Commissioner Administrative X Ordinance LDC Department County Attorney Appeals Admin. Code Division Land Use Public Other By: Walk-On Michael D. Jacob Assistant County Attorney

10. Background: *NOTE: Under Florida Statutes, amendments to the Land Development Code require only one public hearing unless the proposed amendment will affect the list of permitted uses within a zoning district. The proposed amendment to the road impact fee schedule may be adopted after one public hearing. Staff recommends one public hearing date on June 14, 2011.* The Board of County Commissioners has the authority to adopt impact fees pursuant to both the Florida Constitution and Florida Statutes. The Lee Plan requires that the cost for the provision and expansion of services and facilities that benefit new development be borne primarily by those who benefit, and that such funding may include impact fees. The Lee Plan also requires that road impact fees be reviewed regularly and updated when necessary to reflect travel characteristics, construction and right-of-way costs, and to determine if the capital impacts of new growth are met by the fees. The LDC specifically requires the Board to review the Road Impact Fee Schedule every three years and update when necessary. The last impact fee study was completed in 2008. The Board approved a contract with Duncan and Associates, Inc., to review and update the County Road Impact Fee Schedule. Duncan and Associates Inc., prepared a report entitled Road Impact Fee Study - Lee County, Florida dated April 2011. This report forms the basis of the proposed amendments to the Road Impact Fee Schedule. The study proposes an update to the fee schedule located in 2-266. The draft Ordinance reflects the proposed amendment to the LDC updating the Road Impact Fee Schedule. In addition to the change in the impact fee schedule, the Ordinance amends the LDC to provide: (1) impact fee funds collected in the future must be expended or encumbered within twenty years instead of ten years; (2) all currently issued, unexpired road impact fee credits will receive an extension to a 20 year duration instead of 10; (3) future credits will have a 20 year expiration date; (4) amending the impact fee exemption provision to remove the requirement that the replacement of a building, mobile home, park trailer or structure must occur within 5 years to qualify for an exemption; (5) permits the reestablishment of impact fee credits submitted for a project where the building permit expires, is revoked or voluntarily surrendered, and no construction or improvement of land has commenced. The re-established credits will have an expiration date based on the original credit creation date; and, (6) clarifies the requirements for Lee County to recognize impact fee credits issued by participating and nonparticipating municipalities. The Executive Regulatory Oversight Committee reviewed the Ordinance on May 11, 2011 and recommended approval. The Land Development Code Advisory Committee reviewed the Ordinance on May 13, 2011 and recommended approval. The LPA reviewed the Ordinance on May 23, 2011 and found the Ordinance consistent with the Lee Plan. County staff recommends adoption of the proposed ordinance. Attachments: 1. Draft Ordinance 2. FAIS Form 11. Review for Scheduling: Departm ent Director Purchasing or Contracts Human Resources Other County Attorney Budget Services Analyst Risk Grants Mgr. County Manager/P. W. Director

12. Commission Action: Approved Deferred Denied Other

ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LEE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER 2; ARTICLE VI, IMPACT FEES, DIVISION 2, ROADS IMPACT FEES. THE AMENDMENTS PROPOSE TO REVISE THE ROAD IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE. IN ADDITION, REVISIONS ARE PROPOSED TO PROVISIONS GOVERNING THE REFUND OF FEES PAID, EXEMPTIONS, AND ROAD IMPACT FEE CREDITS. WHEREAS, Florida Statutes Section 125.01(1)(t) authorizes counties to adopt ordinances for the exercise of its powers; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Lee County Land Development Code which contains regulations applicable to the development of land in Lee County; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Lee County, Florida, has adopted a comprehensive Land Development Code (LDC); and, WHEREAS, Goal 24 of the Lee County Comprehensive Land Use Plan (Lee Plan) mandates that the County maintain clear, concise, and enforceable development regulations that fully address on-site and off-site development impacts, yet function in a streamlined manner; and, WHEREAS, Goal 39 of the Lee Plan mandates that the County maintain clear, concise, and enforceable development regulations that fully address on-site and off-site development impacts and protect and preserve public transportation facilities; and, WHEREAS, the Florida Legislature adopted the Florida Impact Fee Act finding that impact fees are an important source of revenue for a local government to use in funding the infrastructure necessitated by new growth and further finding that impact fees are an outgrowth of the home rule power of local governments to provide certain services within its jurisdiction (Florida Statutes section 163.31801 et seq. ); and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has the authority to adopt impact fees pursuant to Article VIII of the Constitution of the State, Florida Statues, Chapter 125 and Sections 163.3201, 163.3202, and 380.06(16); and, WHEREAS, Policy 2.3.2. of the Lee County Comprehensive Plan (Lee Plan) provides that the cost for the provision and expansion of services and facilities that benefit new development will be borne primarily by those who benefit, and that such funding may include impact fees; and, WHEREAS, Lee Plan Policy 38.1.1. requires the County to maintain an effective and fair system of impact fees to ensure that development creating additional impacts on arterial and collector roads pays an appropriate fair share of the costs to mitigate off-site impacts; and, 1

WHEREAS, pursuant to Lee Plan Policy 38.1.3., road impact fees must be reviewed regularly and updated when necessary to reflect travel characteristics, construction, and right-of-way costs and to determine if the capital impacts of new growth are met by the fees; and, WHEREAS, Lee Plan Policy 38.1.7. provides that the use of road impact fee revenues to improve State roads is an acceptable application of those funds; and, WHEREAS, Lee Plan Objective 39.1. requires the County to maintain and enforce development regulations to ensure that impacts of development approvals occur concurrently with adequate roads, and to achieve maximum safety, efficiency, and cost effectiveness; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Lee Plan Policy 95.1.3., the minimum acceptable level of service is the basis for roadway facility design, for setting impact fees, and, where applicable, for the operation of the Concurrency Management System; and, WHEREAS, Lee Plan Policy 95.3.1. states that impact fees will be set to capture a substantial portion of the full and real cost of the designated facility, and will be reviewed and updated regularly; and, WHEREAS, Lee Plan Policy 135.1.5. requires the County to provide financial and technical support, including the payment, waiver, or reduction of impact fee for affordable housing; and, WHEREAS, Land Development Code, Section 2-266(f), requires the Board of County Commissioners to review the road impact fee schedule every three years and update when necessary; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners approved a contract with Duncan and Associates, Inc., to review and update the County road impact fee schedule; and, WHEREAS, the study prepared by Duncan and Associates, Inc., entitled Road Impact Fee Study - Lee County, Florida, dated April 2011, forms the basis of the proposed amendments herein; and, WHEREAS, the Duncan and Associates, Inc., study and revised fee schedule relies upon the best available technical data at the time the study was prepared and the use of sophisticated methodology to determine the impacts of development in an effort to establish an appropriate level of impact fees based on most recent localized data; and, WHEREAS, the LDCAC has reviewed the proposed amendments to the LDC on May 13, 2011, and recommended their adoption; and, WHEREAS, the Executive Regulatory Oversight Committee reviewed the proposed amendments to the Code on May 11, 2011, and recommended their adoption; and, 2

WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency reviewed the proposed amendments on May 23, 2011, and found them consistent with the Lee Plan, as indicated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO LDC CHAPTER 2- ADMINISTRATION Lee County Land Development Code Chapter 2 is amended as follows with strike through identifying deleted text and underline identifying new text. Sec. 2-266. - Computation of amount. CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION ARTICLE VI. IMPACT FEES DIVISION 2. ROADS IMPACT FEE (a) At the option of the feepayer, the amount of the roads impact fee may be determined by the schedule set forth in this subsection. The reference in the schedule to square feet refers to the gross square footage of each floor of a building measured to the exterior walls, and not usable, interior, rentable, noncommon or other forms of net square footage. The reference in the schedule to mobile home/rv park site refers to the number of mobile home or recreational vehicle sites permitted by the applicable final development order. The reference in the schedule to mine refers to the number of cubic yards excavated. ROADS IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE Land Use Type Unit Roads Impact Fee Due at 100% of Residential Actual Full Cost Local Roads Single-family residence Dwelling unit $8,976 $6,701 Multiple-family building, duplex, townhouse, two-family Dwelling unit $6,297 $4,659 attached Mobile home/rv park Pad/park site $4,686 $3,499 Elderly/disabled housing Dwelling unit $3,261 $2,435 Adult Congregate Living facility (ACLF) Dwelling unit $2,025 $1,512 Hotel/motel or timeshare Room/unit $5,172 $3,861 Retail Commercial Shopping center 1,000 sq. ft. $10,983 $7,933 Bank 1,000 sq. ft. $25,134 $17,187 3

Car wash, self-service Stall $5,262 $3,800 Convenience store w/gas sales 1,000 sq. ft. $40,305 $29,116 Golf course (open to public) Acre $2,697 $1,907 Movie theater 1,000 sq. ft. $23,220 $16,769 Restaurant, standard 1,000 sq. ft. $20,337 $14,688 Restaurant, fast food 1,000 sq. ft. $44,337 $32,028 Office/Institutional Office, general 1,000 sq. ft. $7,305 $5,355 Office, medical 1,000 sq. ft. $24,126 Hospital 1,000 sq. ft. $11,736 $7,576 Nursing home 1,000 sq. ft. $4,071 $3,481 Church 1,000 sq. ft. $4,575 $3,851 Day care center 1,000 sq. ft. $12,840 $10,705 Elementary/secondary school (private) 1,000 sq. ft. $2,223 $1,897 Industrial Industrial park or general industrial 1,000 sq. ft. $6,195 $4,626 Warehouse 1,000 sq. ft. $4,416 $2,366 Warehouse, High-Cube 1,000 sq. ft. $956 Mini-warehouse 1,000 sq. ft. $1,587 $1,125 Mine Cubic Yard $0.04 $.026 Notes: (1) through (4) remain unchanged. Remaining provisions remain unchanged. Sec. 2-271. Refund of fees paid. Subsection (a) remains unchanged. (b) Any funds not expended or encumbered by the end of the calendar quarter immediately following ten twenty (20) years from the date the roads impact fee was paid will, upon application of the feepayer within 180 days of that date, be returned to the feepayer with interest at the rate of six percent per annum. Sec. 2-274. Exemptions. (a) The following are exempt from payment of the roads impact fee: Subsections (1) through (2) remain unchanged. (3) The replacement of an existing lawfully permitted building, mobile home, park trailer or structure, where the original permit was issued on or before September 16, 1985. However, if any such building, mobile home, park trailer or 4

structure is destroyed, demolished or removed from the property voluntarily or involuntarily; then any replacement will be required to pay the appropriate impact fee, unless: a. a lawful permit is issued for the replacement within five years after such destruction, demolition or removal; and, b. construction commences within said five-year period; and, c. such construction continues in good faith without abandonment, expiration or loss of permits. (4) The replacement of a building, mobile home, park trailer or structure, that was constructed or placed after September 16, 1985, where the correct roads impact fee was paid or otherwise provided for with a new building, mobile home, park trailer or structure of the same use and at the same location, provided that no additional vehicular trips will be produced than those produced by the original use of the land. (4) Building permits that were issued for commercial buildings and residential dwelling units, which have been reinstated by the Building Official in accordance with Chapter 6, are exempt from the payment of impact fee increases that occurred after issuance of the original permit. However, no impact fee refund or credit will be granted if a net decrease results. (5) through (11) remain unchanged. (b) Exemptions must be claimed by the feepayer at the time of the application for before the issuance of a building permit, mobile home move-on permit or recreational vehicle development order. Any exemption not so claimed is deemed waived by the feepayer. Sec. 2-275. Credits. (a)(1) through (a)(4) remain unchanged. (5) Transferability. Roads impact fee credits created on or after October 1, 1989 must be in transferable form and may be sold, assigned or conveyed as set forth in the county Administrative Code. Credits may be used to pay or offset roads impact fees in the same roads impact fee district in which they are earned, or in other districts directly benefitted by the capital improvements for which the credits were granted, and consistent with any interlocal agreements made with participating municipalities. Credits may not be used outside the district earned unless the proposed use is found to be in compliance with this division by the county attorney and the director of the county department of transportation. Unless a longer period is specifically authorized by the Board of County Commissioners, transferable credits must be used within ten twenty (20) years of the date created. The creation date is the 5

date the instruments conveying legal title to the land or improvements given in exchange for credits were recorded in the county's official record book. The creation date for credits pursuant to prepayment of fees under section 2-272 will be the date the prepayment is received by the county. If roads impact fees are increased before the credits are used, the unused transferable credits, when used to pay for the impacts of a particular use listed in section 2-266, will be increased at the time they are used, in the same percentage that the Consumer Price Index All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), All Items, U.S. City Average maintained by the Bureau of Labor Statistics increased between the time the credits are used and the time the credits were created. If roads impact fees are decreased, unused transferable credits will not decrease in value. Credits not used within ten twenty (20) years of issue will expire. Any person who accepts credits in exchange for the dedication of land or improvements does so subject to the limitations on the use, duration, non-refund provisions and other restrictions prescribed in of this division. Subsection (6) remains unchanged. (7) Conversion of credits. Credits created prior to October 1, 1989, may be converted to transferable form unless conversion is prohibited by the conditions of a development order issued pursuant to F.S. ch. 380, or some other participating municipality, state or county development approval. The conversion must be accomplished by an agreement between the county and all owners of the undeveloped land remaining from the original tract of land that was developed or permitted for development as part of the dedication of land or improvements for which the credits were created. The agreements must state that the person who acquires transferable credits will defend and indemnify the county from claims made by other persons asserting an interest in the pre- October 1, 1989, credits. (87) Any person who offers land or improvements in exchange for credits may withdraw the offer prior to the transfer of legal title to the land or improvements and pay the impact fees required by this division. (b) remains unchanged. (c) Credits must be claimed by the feepayer at the time of the application for a building permit, mobile home move-on permit or recreational vehicle development order. Any credits not so claimed will be deemed waived by the feepayer. 6

(d) Once used, credits must be canceled and may not be reestablished. even if the permit for which they were used expires without construction. Notwithstanding, if the permit for which credits were used expires, is revoked or voluntarily surrendered and therefore voided, and no construction or improvement of land has commenced, then the credits may be reestablished. The impact fee credit account will be re-established to its original value prior to any applicable adjustment under section 2-275 (a)(5). Reestablished credits must be issued to the party that used the credits and maintain the original expiration date of the credits. Prior to reestablishment of credits, the feepayer must provide payment of the administrative fee required under 2-271. Payment of the administrative fee may be made by reducing the reestablished impact fee credits by an amount equivalent to the administrative fee due. (e) remains unchanged. (f) Reciprocity with municipalities. (1) Credits issued by participating municipalities will be recognized by Lee County if: a. The credits are issued and used in compliance with section 2-275 for improvements that would qualify under section 2-270; and, b. The issuing municipality has adopted a reciprocal regulation providing for similar recognition of Lee County road impact fee credits; or c. The issuing municipality has previously entered into an agreement with the county allowing reciprocal transfer of impact fee credits between the county and municipality. (2) Credits issued by a nonparticipating municipality will be recognized by Lee County if: a. The credits are issued and used in compliance with section 2-275; and, b. The County agrees by Resolution to allow the reciprocal transfer of impact fee credits for each request. SECTION TWO: CONFLICTS OF LAW Whenever the requirements or provisions of this Ordinance are in conflict with the requirements or provisions of any other lawfully adopted ordinance or statute, the most restrictive requirements will apply. SECTION THREE: SEVERABILITY It is the Board of County Commissioner s intent that if any section, subsection, clause or provision of this ordinance is deemed invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion will become a separate provision and will not affect the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The Board of County Commissioners further declares its intent that this ordinance would have been adopted if such unconstitutional provision was not 7

included. SECTION FOUR: CODIFICATION AND SCRIVENER S ERRORS The Board of County Commissioners intend that this ordinance will be made part of the Lee County Code; and that sections of this ordinance can be renumbered or relettered and that the word ordinance can be changed to section, article or some other appropriate word or phrase to accomplish codification, and regardless of whether this ordinance is ever codified, the ordinance can be renumbered or relettered and typographical errors that do not affect the intent can be corrected with the authorization of the County Administrator, County Manager or his designee, without the need for a public hearing. SECTION FIVE: EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance will take effect upon its filing with the Office of the Secretary of the Florida Department of State. Amendments to 2-271, will apply to all impact fees collected after the effective date of this Ordinance. Amendments to 2-275 providing a twenty year expiration date for road impact fee credits will also apply retroactively to all unexpired impact fees credits issued as of the effective date of this Ordinance. 8

Commissioner made a motion to adopt the foregoing ordinance, seconded by Commissioner. The vote was as follows: John E. Manning Brian Bigelow Ray Judah Tammara Hall Frank Mann DONE AND ADOPTED this day of 2011. ATTEST: CHARLIE GREEN, CLERK LEE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY: Deputy Clerk BY: Frank Mann, Chairman Approved as to form by: County Attorney s Office 9