Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Similar documents
Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CALIFORNIA S' '( * ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

COMMERCIAL EXCHANGE BUILDING West 8th Street and 800 South Olive Street CHC HCM ENV CE

CALIFORNIA. cfr. i l fi ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CALIFORNIA. Si*-: A m (213) PILAR BUELNA DIANE KANNER BARRY A MILOFSKY. WOED>: ff ERIC GARCETTI

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

EXECUTIVE OFFICES CITY PLANNING 200 N. Spring Street, Room 532 CALIFORNIA. Los ANGELES, CA (213)

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CALIFORNIA. 'w<. LISA M. WEBBER, AICP GAIL KENNARD DEPUTY DIRECTOR VICE PRESIDENT (213) PILAR BUELNA DIANE KANNER BARRY A MILOFSKY

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CATALINA SWIMWEAR BUILDING 443 South San Pedro Street CHC HCM ENV CE

SRL. Cultural Heritage Commission Report

LANDMARK DESIGNATION PROCEEDINGS (BHMC ) PRELIMINARY EVALUATION

TALBOT-WOOD DOUBLE DWELLING North Las Palmas Avenue CHC HCM ENV CE

& DEL VAC LLP SAN VICENTE BOULEVARD, SUITE 900 LOS ANGELES, CA October 22, 2013

CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION

BRLYRLY. Cultural Heritage Commission Report. City. of Beverly. Hills Planning Division. Meeting Date: January 10, Subject:

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

[iij ill. I IIII1ULI Iir. Cultural Heritage Commission Report. p..,

Senior Planner, City of Santa Monica From: Christine Lazzaretto; Molly Iker Date: April 1, Gale Place

CORBIN PALMS MODEL H North Jumilla Avenue CHC HCM ENV CE

EAMES HOUSE: A PRECEDENT STUDY Lea Santano & Lauren Martin

CITY OF LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR. Sharon Gin, Legislative Assistant Planning and Land Use Management Committee

L A N D M A R K S P R E S E R V A T I O N C O M M I S S I O N

BENEFICIAL PLAZA AND LIBERTY PARK

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

HOLLYWOOD CITIZEN-NEWS BUILDING North Wilcox Avenue CHC HCM ENV CE

P RESERVATION C OMMISSION

M E M O R A N D U M PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CITY OF SANTA MONICA PLANNING DIVISION

Memorandum. Overview. Background Information. To: Scott Albright, City of Santa Monica Date: 04/22/2013 Jan Ostashay, Principal OAC

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

2501 2nd Street Santa Monica, California City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report

THE ARCHITECTURAL FORUM INDIVIDUAL PLUMBING FOR EVERY HOME

435 Georgina Avenue, Santa Monica Historic Resource Assessment HISTORIC RESOURCES GROUP

MIAMI WOMAN S CLUB 1737 N. BAYSHORE DRIVE. Designation Report. City of Miami

CEQA and Historic Preservation: A 360 Degree Review

BERGER WINSTON APARTMENT BUILDING /2 S. Ridgeley Drive CHC HCM ENV CE

Chapter HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

HCM # 225: Los Angeles Theatre. CITY OF LOS ANGELES Office of Historic Resources Cultural Heritage Commission

Criteria Evaluation: Landmark staff found that the structure application meets History Criteria 1a, and Architecture Criterion 2a and 2b.

LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING RECOMMENDATION REPORT AND NOTICE

John Byers (Third) Residence 2034 La Mesa Drive Santa Monica, California City Landmark Assessment Report

Architectural Inventory Form

Chapter 22 Historic Preservation/Design Review

Architectural Inventory Form

Memorandum. Historic Resources Inventory Survey Form 315 Palisades Avenue, 1983.

th Street Santa Monica, California City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report. Evaluation Report Parcel Map Sanborn Maps Photographs

DESIGNATION OF 377 ARROYO TERRACE AS A LANDMARK

Office of Historic Resources

INTENSIVE HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY ADELANTE EASTSIDE REDEVELOPMENT AREA LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA

LOCAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION FORM

MAR Los Angeles City Council Room 395, City Hall 200 North Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012

CHAPTER 20 HISTORIC PRESERVATION

Architectural Inventory Form

BEFORE THE JACKSONVILLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ORDER GRANTING REOUEST FOR DEMOLITION

Transcription:

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT CULTURAL HERITAGE COMMISSION HEARING DATE: March 7, 2013 TIME: 10:00 AM PLACE: City Hall, Room 1010 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 CASE NO.: CHC-2012-3512-HCM ENV-2012-3513-CE Location: 12354 W. Rochedale Lane Council District: 11 Community Plan Area: Brentwood Pacific Palisades Area Planning Commission: West Los Angeles Neighborhood Council: None Legal Description: Lot 59 of Tract 14944 PROJECT: REQUEST: OWNER: PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION Historic-Cultural Monument Application for the RICE RESIDENCE Declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument William Herd 12354 Rochedale Lane Los Angeles, CA 90049 Historic Preservation Partners 419 Concord Ave. Monrovia, CA 91016 That the Cultural Heritage Commission: 1. Not declare the property a Historic-Cultural Monument per Los Angeles Administrative Code Chapter 9, Division 22, Article 1, Section 22.171.7 2. Adopt the report findings. MICHAEL J. LOGRANDE Director of Planning [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Lambert M. Giessinger, Preservation Architect Office of Historic Resources Prepared by: [SIGNED ORIGINAL IN FILE] Edgar Garcia, Preservation Planner Office of Historic Resources Attachments: Historic-Cultural Monument Application

Rice Residence CHC-2012-3512-HCM Page 2 of 3 SUMMARY Built in 1950, this single story single-family residence exhibits character- defining features of Modern and International Style residential architecture. The rectangular plan subject building has a pitched roof clad in gravel. No discernible entrance is visible from the main elevation but entry is gained through sliding French doors on the northern and eastern elevations of the building. Windows are metal casement including large sliding windows with large expanses of clear glass. Character-defining elements of the structure are the extensive use of glass expanses, wood panels, and a prominent concrete block fireplace. Significant interior spaces include the exposed post-and-beam ceiling. Secondary buildings consist of an attached carport structure constructed in 1964. The subject building was designed by noted architects A. Quincy Jones and Whitney R. Smith, with engineer Edgardo Contini. Jones was a prolific modernist architect and green space advocate, working with Paul Williams and housing developer Joseph Eichler. Smith designed several noteworthy modern residential buildings in Los Angeles and Southern California. Jones and Smith worked together on a collection of homes for the Mutual Housing Association Community between 1947-1950 in Crestwood Hills. The subject property is related to this early cooperative development. Jones was later hired by William Pereira to work on the development of Irvine, California in 1960. The proposed Rice Residence historic monument is part of the Crestwood Hills development, the only successful large-scale cooperative housing development in California and a neighborhood that today has a high concentration of significant modernist residential architecture. The Cultural Heritage Commission and the City Council have previously approved 16 other Crestwood Hills homes as Historic-Cultural Monuments. Alterations include the construction of a carport in 1958, addition of a pool in 1964, and reorientation of the carport to the Broom Way entrance. CRITERIA The criterion is the Cultural Heritage Ordinance which defines a historical or cultural monument as any site (including significant trees or other plant life located thereon) building or structure of particular historic or cultural significance to the City of Los Angeles, such as historic structures or sites in which the broad cultural, economic, or social history of the nation, State or community is reflected or exemplified, or which are identified with historic personages or with important events in the main currents of national, State or local history or which embody the distinguishing characteristics of an architectural type specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period style or method of construction, or a notable work of a master builder, designer or architect whose individual genius influenced his age. DISCUSSION The written nomination argues that the Rice Residence meets specified Historic-Cultural Monument (HCM) criteria, that it embodies distinguishing characteristics of an architecturaltype specimen, inherently valuable for a study of a period, style, or method of construction. The Cultural Heritage Commission has previously designated 16 Crestwood Hills homes as Historic-Cultural Monuments. Recently in 2012, the CHC designated two properties in the area, the Stein House (HCM #1015) and the Schneidman House (HCM #1016) both which exhibited a high level of architectural integrity. Because of the number of existing HCMs, their duplicative nature as model homes, and the level of integrity expected for these homes, staff finds that the subject building exhibits enough alterations to render the Rice Residence ineligible for local

Rice Residence CHC-2012-3512-HCM Page 3 of 3 designation. The addition of the carport, changes to interior openings and finishes, and the condition of the setting and landscaping present enough integrity issues to compromise the eligibility of the subject property. Future rehabilitation work that meets the Secretary of the Interior s Standards may allow for the Rice Residence to meet HCM criteria once the work has been completed. Based on these findings, the subject property does not appear to be eligible for local designation as a Historic-Cultural Monument. BACKGROUND At its meeting of January 10, 2013, the Cultural Heritage Commission voted to take the application under consideration. On February 7, 2013, the Cultural Heritage Commission toured the subject property.