The End of the Tour. Gerald Walrath Kirby, Mathews & Walrath, PLLC

Similar documents
OIL AND GAS LEASE for UMBERACRE

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

Negotiations. October 25, Eric R. King

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RETAINED ACREAGE CLAUSES RECENT CASES AND ISSUES. Presented by: J. DERRICK PRICE, Austin McGinnis Lochridge

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

TOWN OF WINDSOR RESOLUTION NO

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

ARE WE THERE YET? An Examination of the Commencement & Termination of an Oil and Gas Lease. Institute for Energy Law Texas Mineral Title Course

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

FIRST AMENDMENT TO OIL AND GAS LEASE THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS COUNTY OF TARRANT

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS HEARINGS DIVISION ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC AMENDING FIELD RULES HOEFS T-K (WOLFCAMP) FIELD REEVES COUNTY, TEXAS

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS DIVISION

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

TWENTY-FIVE PROVISIONS OF AN OIL AND GAS LEASE IN FIFTY MINUTES

Oil & Gas Leases Other Issues and Concerns

TEXAS OIL AND GAS PATTERN JURY CHARGES QUESTIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS. Presented By: RICARDO E. MORALES

PHILIP C. MANI Mani Little & Wortmann, PLLC 112 E. Pecan Street, Suite 1600 San Antonio, Texas

Things You May Have Missed

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

FINAL ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

RECITALS. PPAB v3 PPAB v4

October 8, APPEARANCES: For Complainant Woolsey Well Service, L.P. and J & C Operating Co. Dick Marshall Rick Woolsey PROPOSAL FOR DECISION

The recent downturn in oil and gas prices stymied

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Submitted on Briefs August 4, 2009

(1) Oil & Gas Lease #10-060

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 109,297. MIKE NETAHLA and DEBRA FRANCIS, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC

THE STATE OF TEXAS OIL AND GAS LEASE (SURFACE USE) COUNTY OF TARRANT

NO CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL E OCTOBER 31, 2008 DION S OF TEXAS, INC.

Well Site Operations & Surface Damages: Assessing Lieabilities and Calculating Damages

PAID-UP OIL & GAS LEASE

In The Eleventh Court of Appeals. No CV

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No. Appellees. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JURISDICTION BY APPELLANTS

PAID-UP OIL & GAS LEASE

August 1, 2012 PROPOSAL FOR DECISION PROCEDURAL HISTORY

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

October 25, Eric R. King

Case 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

The Subsurface Mineral Regulations, 1960

Working with Breach of Lease Condition

Oil & Gas Chapter 5: Oil and Gas Lease as an FSD

The Subsurface Mineral Regulations, 1960

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HEARINGS SECTION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,364 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JAMES F. SHEPHERD, Appellee,

Important aspects of an oil & gas lease Clif Little OSU Extension Agriculture and Natural Resources Guernsey and Noble Counties Feb.

Case 4:12-cv Document 7-5 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/12 Page 1 of 8

THE TOP TEN LEGAL PITFALLS 2015 AAPL MODEL FORM JOA

[Cite as Maggiore v. Kovach, 101 Ohio St.3d 184, 2004-Ohio-722.]

OIL AND GAS LEASE NO.

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

LEASE CLAUSES FOR THE MODIFIED LYNCH FORM. Description of Leased Substances Coalbed Methane. Description of Premises Limited Depth.

MINERAL LAW FINAL EXAMINATION. P.N. Davis. Friday, December 10, 1999: 1:00-3:30 PM Thursday, December 16, 1999: 8:30-11:00 AM

ALBERTA SURFACE LEASE AGREEMENT

SECTIONS 1 THROUGH 4, SECTION 4-A, SECTIONS 5 THROUGH 11, SECTIONS 11-A AND 11-B, SECTIONS 12 THROUGH 17, SECTION 17-A, AND SECTIONS 18 AND

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS

Jamie Nielson, Attorney Sandel Energy, Inc. Joe Sandel Don Rhodes, Consultant. Neva Laverne Cook Beene Etha Cook Curtis Lawrence Jarvis Self

Review of the Typical California Oil & Gas Lease with a focus on Essential, Defensive and Administrative Clauses and Keeping Your Lease Alive

The Helium and Associated Gases Regulations, 1964

No. 108,488 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. WANDA SIEKER, Appellee, FAYE M. STEPHENS TRUST, et al., Appellants. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

P.F. WOOD, APPELLANT, V. C. MANDRILLA, RESPONDENT. SAC. NO SUPREME COURT

Louisiana Law Review. Gerald LeVan. Volume 21 Number 3 April Repository Citation

OIL AND GAS LEASE (PAID-UP)

CAUSE NO. V. KARNES COUNTY, TEXAS. Defendants. JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION COME NOW JOHN JOSEPH FOSTER, INDIVIDUALLY; AND KELLY

TAMARAC BY-THE-GULF, INC. SUBDIVISION DEED RESTRICTIONS SECTION: #2

A Form Shopping Center Lease

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) OPINION 1. Before the Court is the Objection of the FLYi and

****************************************************** * KEY ISSUES: Confiscation * * Legal Subdivision * * Date of Attachment of Vol. Sub.

PAID-UP OIL & GAS LEASE

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT RIVER EDGE COLORADO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

OFFICE LEASE. By Richard R. Goldberg Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania All Rights Reserved 1999 AGREEMENT OF LEASE

DESIRABLE AMENDMENTS TO PETROLEUM AND NATURAL GAS LEASES

LEASING OF POTASSIUM, SULPHUR, SODIUM, PHOSPHORUS, AND SIMILAR MINERALS, AND THEIR SALTS AND COMPOUNDS EXCEPT SODIUM CHLORIDE

The Helium and Associated Gases Regulations, 1964

Chapter 13. Oil and Gas Law Update

MEETINGS ARE NOW BEING RECORDED ALL DISCUSSIONS ARE SUMMARIZED. FOR COMPLETE PROCEEDINGS PLEASE SEE CORRESPONDING CD FOR THIS MEETING DAY.

Slip Rental Agreement

Certiorari not Applied for COUNSEL

OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D ** TRIBUNAL NOS POTAMKIN CHEVROLET, ** Appellee. **

OPINION. No CV. Tomas ZUNIGA and Berlinda A. Zuniga, Appellants. Margaret L. VELASQUEZ, Appellee

ASSIGNMENT OF LEASES AND RENTS

LAKE BLOOMINGTON LEASE TRANSFER REQUEST

RULE 37 CASE NO District 06

LEASE AGREEMENT. Between NEW ALBANY-FLOYD COUNTY SCHOOL BUILDING CORPORATION LESSOR. and

Commercial Sub-Lease Agreement

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

DEPOSIT AGREEMENT GUARANTEEING SITE PLAN IMPROVEMENTS WITH CASH ESCROW

THIRD AMENDED DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR TIMBER RIDGE

Retail Leases Amendment Act 2005 No 90

ACCESS AND OPTION AGREEMENT TEMPLATE FOR REAL PROPERTY PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS

PRESENT: Lemons, Goodwyn, Millette, Mims, and Powell, JJ., and Russell and Koontz, S.JJ.

AMENDED AND RESTATED TRANSMISSION LINES EASEMENT AND RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF SAN PATRICIO

Oil & Gas Law. Class 16: Lessor Title Issues (1 of 6) Mineral Interests & Royalty Interests

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN

AN OVERVIEW OF OIL AND GAS LEASE EXPIRATION ISSUES. George A. Bibikos Cozen O Connor

Lease Agreement WITNESSETH: Leasehold

Transcription:

The End of the Tour Gerald Walrath Kirby, Mathews & Walrath, PLLC

Drill Baby Drill!

The beginning of your project

The middle of your project

RETAINED ACREAGE PROVISIONS Or how I was Wilson Phillipsed into Submission

Hold On

Retained Acreage Clause - Example Notwithstanding anything in this lease to the contrary, at the end of the primary term or upon cessation of continuous development, as hereafter defined, whichever is later, this lease shall terminate and be of no further force and effect as to all of said land except those portions within the drilling, spacing or proration unit (the "production unit") assigned by Lessee according to applicable rules of the Texas Railroad Commission (or successor governmental authority having jurisdiction) to a well then capable of producing oil or gas in paying quantities, each such unit containing the minimum amount of acreage necessary for the well to be assigned the maximum allowable production (if allowable production is assigned on the basis of acreage per well) or otherwise prescribed as the minimum area for a proration unit, and necessary for the well to be operated at a regular location in compliance with applicable well spacing and density rules.

Retained Acreage Clause Horizontal Example [T]his lease shall likewise terminate as to all depths and horizons in each such production unit lying more than 100 feet below the stratigraphic equivalent of the deepest depth from which production in paying quantities is then being had (or at which a well capable of producing gas in paying quantities has been completed). At such time Lessee shall release this lease as to all lands and depths as to which it has thus terminated and shall file such release for record and furnish a copy of same to Lessor.

RECENT CASES ON RETAINED ACREAGE

ConocoPhillips Company v. Vaquillas Unproven Minerals, Ltd. The actual language of the retained acreage clause: Lessee covenants and agrees to execute and deliver to Lessor a written release of any and all portions of this lease which have not been drilled to a density of at least 40 acres for each producing oil well and 640 acres for each producing or shut-in gas well, except that in case any rule adopted by the Railroad Commission of Texas or other regulating authority for any field on this lease provides for a spacing or proration establishing different units of acreage per well, then such established different units shall be held under this lease by such production, in lieu of the 40 and 640-acre units above mentioned.

Arguments of ConocoPhillips The field rule did not establish a maximum acreage that could be assigned to a well, and Rule 38 only establishes the minimum acreage required to drill a well. Under the court's holding the exception would swallow the general rule because if the minimum required acreage under Rule 38 is applied, the 640- acre general rule would never apply. The holding would be adverse to the pooling clause. The language within the retained acreage clause that each unit shall contain "at least" one well would be rendered superfluous. The retained acreage clause provided a different number of acres to be retained for oil wells and gas wells, while there is no difference under the court's construction.

More arguments of ConocoPhillips The court should not interpret the retained acreage clause to impose a limitation on the grant unless the language is clear. Oh, come on, your honor! Please?

Argument of Vaquillas The field rules did not provide for the size of proration units. The wells drilled by ConocoPhillips are subject to a 467/1200 spacing rule. Rule 38 of the RRC statewide rules provides that, if the field rules for a gas field do not provide for proration unit sizes but only for well spacing rules, the standard proration size for a field with a spacing rule of 467-1200 is 40 acres per well. Neener neener neener.

Judgment of Appellate Court

Aftermath Subsequent Procedural History currently with SCOTEX

Endeavor Energy Resources v. Discovery Operating The actual retained acreage clause: 18. At the end of the Primary Term or upon the cessation of the continuous development of the Leased premises required above, whichever is later, this lease shall automatically terminate as to all lands and depths covered herein, save and except those lands and depths located within a governmental proration unit assigned to a well producing oil or gas in paying quantities and the depths down to and including one hundred feet (100') below the deepest productive perforation(s), with each such governmental proration unit to contain the number of acres required to comply with the applicable rules and regulations of the Railroad Commission of Texas for obtaining the maximum producing allowable for the particular well.

More Endeavor What Rule 3 says: The acreage assigned to an individual well shall be known as a proration unit. The standard drilling and proration units are established hereby to be EIGHTY (80) acres. No proration unit shall [**7] consist of more than EIGHTY (80) acres except as hereinafter provided. The two farthermost points in any proration unit shall not be in excess of THREE THOUSAND (3,000) feet removed from each other; provided however, that in the case of long and narrow leases or in cases where because of the shape of the lease such is necessary to permit the utilization of tolerance acreage, the Commission may after proper showing grant exceptions to the limitations as to the shape of proration units as herein contained. All proration units shall consist of continuous and contiguous acreage which can reasonably be considered to be productive of oil. No double assignment of acreage will be accepted.

Still more Endeavor Notwithstanding the above, operators may elect to assign a tolerance of not more than EIGHTY (80) acres of additional unassigned lease acreage to a well on an EIGHTY (80) acre unit and shall in such event receive allowable credit for not more than ONE HUNDRED SIXTY (160) acres. Operators shall file with the Commission certified plats of their properties in said field, which plats shall set out distinctly all of those things pertinent to the determination of the acreage credit claimed for each well. Endeavor files plats with the RRC of its proration, as required, and designates 80-acre proration units for each well.

So what s the hubbub, bub?

Endeavor yet again Prescribed vs. Permitted, e.g. construing required to comply with We conclude that Section 18 unambiguously required Endeavor to file, before the automatic termination date, a certified proration plat with the RRC that assigned acreage to a governmental proration unit in order to avoid having its mineral interests in that acreage revert back to the lessors. Because Endeavor did not file certified proration plats with the RRC that assigned the acreage in the disputed quarter sections by the automatic termination dates, the quantity of acreage that terminated under the lease includes the acreage in the disputed quarter sections. This case is similar to cases cited by Discovery and Patriot in which the courts held that the leases terminated because the [**23] lessee failed to comply with a requirement in the [*179] lease for maintaining it. 2 Discovery and Patriot established their right to summary judgment on their trespass to try title claim. The trial court did not err when it granted Appellees' motions for summary judgment and when it denied Endeavor's motion for summary judgment. Endeavor's issue is overruled.

Aftermath of Endeavor Currently with SCOTEX RRC aftermath Final Order in Consolidated Oil and Gas Docket Nos. 7C-029-1169 and 7C-0291171 requirement to file proration plats with P-15 is nullified.

Restoration of Premises

What your lessor thinks it looks like

What you think it looks like

Warren Petroleum Corp. V. Monzingo, 304 S.W. 2d 362 (Tex. 1957) Landowner seeks recovery from the lessee for failing to restore the surface after abandonment of operations, including unfilled slush pits, ruts, and a gravel road. Holding?

No Soup For You! No recovery for plaintiff, either.

JOINT OPERATING AGREEMENT CONSIDERATIONS

What is the lifespan of a Joint Operating Agreement?

Is it infinite?

Do we measure it a quarter mile at a time?

Well no, it s actually given in Article XIII ARTICLE XIII. TERM OF AGREEMENT This agreement shall remain in full force and effect as to the Oil and Gas Leases and/or Oil and Gas Interests subject hereto for the period of time selected below; provided, however, no party hereto shall ever be construed as having any right, title or interest in or to any Lease or Oil and Gas Interest contributed by any other party beyond the term of this agreement. Option No. 1: So long as any of the Oil and Gas Leases subject to this agreement remain or are continued in force as to any part of the Contract Area, whether by production, extension, renewal or otherwise. Option No. 2: In the event the well described in Article VI.A., or any subsequent well drilled under any provision of this agreement, results in the Completion of a well as a well capable of production of Oil and/or Gas in paying quantities, this agreement shall continue in force so long as any such well is capable of production, and for an additional period of days thereafter; provided, however, if, prior to the expiration of such additional period of additional period, one or more of the parties hereto are engaged in drilling, Reworking, Deepening, Sidetracking, Plugging Back, testing or attempting to Complete or Re-complete a well or wells hereunder, this agreement shall continue in force until such operations have been completed and if production results therefrom, this agreement shall continue in force as provided herein. In the event the well described in Article VI.A., or any subsequent well drilled hereunder, results in a dry hole, and no other well is capable of producing Oil and/or Gas from the Contract Area, this agreement shall terminate unless drilling, Deepening, Sidetracking, Completing, Re-completing, Plugging Back or Reworking operations are commenced within days from the date of abandonment of said well. Abandonment for such purposes shall mean either (i) a decision by all parties not to conduct any further operations on the well or (ii) the elapse of 180 days from the conduct of any operations on the well, whichever first occurs. The termination of this agreement shall not relieve any party hereto from any expense, liability or other obligation or any remedy therefor which has accrued or attached prior to the date of such termination. Upon termination of this agreement and the satisfaction of all obligations hereunder, in the event a memorandum of this Operating Agreement has been filed of record, Operator is authorized to file of record in all necessary recording offices a notice of termination, and each party hereto agrees to execute such a notice of termination as to Operator s interest, upon request of Operator, if Operator has satisfied all its financial obligations.

Wagner & Brown, Ltd v. Sheppard AKA bad facts make bad law

Proper attire when considering the implications of the case. Seriously there is even a law review article entitled What Hath Sheppard Wrought? It really spun a lot of people around.

An actual Joint Operating Agreement under Wagner & Brown, Ltd.V. Sheppard

In conclusion when considering how to wrap up a lease or unit, keep it real, think slow, and we should get through it just fine.

Gerald Walrath Partner Tel: (713) 489-4620 Fax: (713) 489-4619 Cel: (281) 703-6669 jwalrath@kmwenergylaw.com www.kmwenergylaw.com