Authors Matt Ainsaar Paul Shipp Jojo Chen Copyright, Urban Enterprise Pty Ltd, September 2011. This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under Copyright Act 1963, no part may be reproduced without written permission of Urban Enterprise Pty Ltd. Document Information Filename: Armstrong Creek West Precinct DCP Draft Version 2.1.docx Last Saved: 15 November 2011 12:00 PM Last Printed: 15 November 2011 12:01 PM File Size: 3312 kb Disclaimer Neither Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. nor any member or employee of Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. takes responsibility in any way whatsoever to any person or organisation (other than that for which this report has been prepared) in respect of the information set out in this report, including any errors or omissions therein. In the course of our preparation of this report, projections have been prepared on the basis of assumptions and methodology which have been described in the report. It is possible that some of the assumptions underlying the projections may change. Nevertheless, the professional judgement of the members and employees of Urban Enterprise Pty. Ltd. have been applied in making these assumptions, such that they constitute an understandable basis for estimates and projections. Beyond this, to the extent that the assumptions do not materialise, the estimates and projections of achievable results may vary.
CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1. BACKGROUND 3 1.2. INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY 3 1.3. THE DCP AREA 4 1.4. DCP TIMEFRAME 5 2. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 6 2.1. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 1987 6 2.2. STATE PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT 6 3. LOCAL STRATEGIC CONTEXT 7 3.1. LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT 7 4. NEED AND NEXUS 8 4.1. INTRODUCTION 8 4.2. LAND BUDGET 8 4.3. RESIDENTIAL DWELLING YIELD AND POPULATION 9 4.4. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTIONS 9 4.5. DEMAND UNITS 10 4.6. OTHER USES 10 5. INFRASTRUCTURE ITEMS TO BE FUNDED BY THE DCP 11 5.1. DISTINCTION BETWEEN COMMUNITY AND DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE 11 5.2. EXTERNAL DEMAND 11 5.3. COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE ITEMS 11 5.4. DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ITEMS 12 5.5. INFRASTRUCTURE LOCATION MAPS 12 6. CALCULATION OF LEVIES 19 6.1. METHOD OF CALCULATING LEVIES 19 6.2. DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTION RATES PER DEMAND UNIT 19 7. DCP ADMINISTRATION 21 7.1. INDEXATION OF LEVIES 21 7.2. VALUATION OF LAND 21 7.3. COLLECTING AGENCY 21 7.4. DEVELOPMENT AGENCY 21 7.5. COLLECTION OF LEVIES 22 7.6. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES 23 7.7. METHOD OF PROVISION 23 8. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 24 8.1. INTRODUCTION 24 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG I URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
8.2. PROVISION OF LAND AND WORKS IN-KIND 24 8.3. LAND 25 8.4. INFRASTRUCTURE ALLOCATION AND STRATEGIC JUSTIFICATION 25 8.5. DETAILED CALCULATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE LEVIES 25 8.6. DCP SUMMARY TABLES 36 FIGURES FIGURE 1 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT (MAIN CATCHMENT AREA) 5 FIGURE 2 LOCATION OF LAND ITEMS 13 FIGURE 3 LOCATION OF ROAD ITEMS 14 FIGURE 4 LOCATION OF TRAIL ITEMS 15 FIGURE 5 LOCATION OF OPEN SPACE ITEMS 16 FIGURE 6 LOCATION OF DRAINAGE ITEMS 17 FIGURE 7 LOCATION OF COMMUNITY ITEMS 18 TABLES TABLE 1 LAND BUDGET SUMMARY 8 TABLE 2 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND ESTIMATED POPULATION 9 TABLE 3 ACTIVITY CENTRE PROJECTIONS 9 TABLE 4 DEMAND UNITS BY LAND USE 10 TABLE 5 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY PER DWELLING 20 TABLE 6 DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY PER DEMAND UNIT 20 TABLE 7 INFRASTRUCTURE ITEMS, COST APPORTIONMENT AND STRATEGIC JUSTIFICATION 26 TABLE 8 DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY CALCULATION BY INFRASTRUCTURE ITEM 32 TABLE 9 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY CALCULATION BY INFRASTRUCTURE ITEM 35 TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF LAND USE 36 TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF LEVIES PAYABLE (JULY 2011 VALUES) 36 TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF COSTS APPORTIONED AND FUNDS TO BE COLLECTED (JULY 2011 VALUES) 36 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG II URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. BACKGROUND This Armstrong Creek West Precinct Development Contributions Plan (DCP) has been developed to support the funding of infrastructure in the Armstrong Creek West Precinct (ACEP). The Armstrong Creek West Precinct Structure Plan (PSP) has been prepared by Villawood Properties and Mesh Planning in conjunction with the City of Greater Geelong (COGG). The Armstrong Creek West Precinct sets the long - term strategic framework for the development of the Precinct in relation to: Land use (such as residential development of varying densities, open space and community facilities); Transport (such as the road network, collector roads & proposed public transport); Activity Centres; and Open space (passive & active), waterways and environmentally sensitive areas. This DCP applies to the entire Precinct as a single area and requires contributions from all landowners/developers in the Precinct. Public land is excluded from the Net Developable Area and therefore development contributions. Improved social, economic, environmental and urban design outcomes are achieved through the provision of infrastructure early in the development of a new community. The delivery of key infrastructure in a timely and efficient manner is fundamental to sustainable outcomes in urban growth areas such as the Armstrong Creek West Precinct. 1.2. INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY The Armstrong Creek Integrated Infrastructure Delivery Plan (2009) identifies a range of civil and social infrastructure required as part of the development of the Armstrong Creek Urban Growth Area (ACUGA). The ACUGA includes 7 precincts: Marshall Precinct, North East Industrial Precinct, Horseshoe Bend Precinct, Major Activity Centre Precinct, Armstrong Creek West Precinct, Western Industrial Precinct and Armstrong Creek East Precinct. These infrastructure items were identified to support the entire Armstrong Creek Urban Growth Area. Although the catchment areas for individual infrastructure items may overlap or cross Precinct boundaries, the overall infrastructure provision for the Growth Area is appropriate for the total projected development, population and employment levels. Therefore, each Precinct is required to contribute via development contributions towards local infrastructure items located within the Precinct. This DCP will collect levies to ensure that the infrastructure set out in the Integrated Infrastructure Delivery Plan relevant to the Precinct is funded to enable COGG to provide the infrastructure. However, this DCP is not the sole source of funding for all infrastructure in the Precinct. The full range of infrastructure identified will only be delivered if infrastructure is provided by a variety of funding sources. The infrastructure items will be provided through a number of mechanisms including: ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 3 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
Subdivision and development construction works by developers; Development contributions (community infrastructure levy and development infrastructure levy as shown in this DCP); Utility service provider contributions; and Capital works projects by Council, state government agencies and community groups. Decisions have been made about the type of infrastructure which will be funded by this DCP, and these decisions are in line with the Ministerial Direction for Development Contributions. This DCP document has been developed in accordance with the provisions of Part 3B of the Planning and Environment Act (1987) and the Victorian State Government Development Contributions Guidelines (2007). 1.3. THE DCP AREA The Armstrong Creek West Precinct, otherwise referred to in this report as the Main Catchment Area (MCA), consists of land identified in Figure 1 below. The Precinct is generally bounded by: Ghazeepore Road to the west; The Warrnambool Melbourne rail line to the north; Surf Coast Highway to the east; and The Armstrong Creek West Employment Precinct and the Urban Growth Boundary to the south. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 4 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 1 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT (MAIN CATCHMENT AREA) Source: Armstrong Creek West Precinct Structure Plan, 2011 1.4. DCP TIMEFRAME For the purposes of the DCP a 20 year life has been adopted. This period commences from the date that the DCP is incorporated into the Greater Geelong Planning Scheme. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 5 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
2. STATUTORY FRAMEWORK 2.1. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT ACT 1987 Part 3B of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 outlines the statutory provisions relating to development contributions. In summary, Part 3B provides for, amongst other things: The inclusion of a DCP in the planning scheme, for the purpose of levying contributions for the provision of works, services and facilities (section 46I); The provision to impose either a development infrastructure levy or a community infrastructure levy (section 46J); The contents required of a DCP (Section 46K); The setting of limits in respect of a community infrastructure levy. In the case of the construction of a dwelling, the community levy must not exceed $900 per dwelling (section 46L); The provision for the Minister to issue written directions relating to the preparation and content of a DCP (section 46M); The collection of a development infrastructure levy, by way of a condition on a planning permit either requiring the payment of a levy within a specified time, or entering into an agreement to pay the levy within a specified time (section 46N). 2.2. STATE PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT The Minister s Direction dated 15 May 2003 outlines what may be funded with a development contribution levy, namely: Acquisition of land for roads, public transport corridors, drainage, public open space, community facilities; Construction of roads, including bicycle, footpaths and traffic management devices; Construction of public transport infrastructure, including fixed rail infrastructure, railway stations, bus stops and tram stops; Basic improvements to public open space, including earthworks, landscaping, fencing, seating and playground equipment; Drainage works; Buildings and works for maternal and child health centre, child care centre, kindergarten or a combination of these. The Victorian State Government has published a set of documents which make up the Development Contributions Guidelines (2007). The Development Contributions Guidelines (2007) are available through the Department of Planning and Community Development (DPCD) website. These documents provide guidance as to how DCPs are to be prepared and administered including the matters that DCPs are to consider. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 6 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
3. LOCAL STRATEGIC CONTEXT 3.1. LOCAL PLANNING CONTEXT A number of strategic planning documents have been prepared by, or on behalf of COGG that identify the need, standard and costs for the infrastructure items that are included in this DCP. The strategic documents that have informed the provision of infrastructure items to be financed by the DCP are: Armstrong Creek West Precinct Structure Plan (Draft), Villawood Properties (2011); Armstrong Creek Integrated Infrastructure Delivery Plan, City of Greater Geelong (2009); Armstrong Creek Social Integrated Infrastructure Delivery Plan, City of Greater Geelong (2009); Armstrong Creek West Precinct Traffic Impact Assessment, GTA Consultants (October 2011); Armstrong Creek West Precinct Structure Plan Flooding Investigations, Water Technology (October 2011); Armstrong Creek West Precinct Stormwater Management Strategy, Neil Craigie (28 October 2011); Armstrong Creek West Development Contributions Project Costings, Prowse Quantity Surveyors (31 August 2011); and Armstrong Creek West Development Contributions Plan Valuation Report, Charter Keck Cramer (30 August 2011). This DCP has been prepared in close consultation with Council officers from relevant departments of the City of Greater Geelong. Council officers have also provided strategic planning information and advice regarding costs for this DCP where appropriate. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 7 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
4. NEED AND NEXUS 4.1. INTRODUCTION Council has identified a need for each of the community and development infrastructure items that have been included in this DCP. Council has identified that each item is needed in order to provide for the wellbeing, health and safety of the future community. The cost apportionment methodology adopted in this DCP relies on the nexus principle. The Main Catchment Area (MCA) for this DCP is deemed to have a nexus with an infrastructure item if the occupants of the MCA are likely to make use of the infrastructure item. In order to fairly levy developers achieving varying densities while maintaining financial certainty for Council, a standard per hectare of net developable land demand unit is used. A standard per dwelling demand unit is used for the assessment of the community infrastructure levy. The land area within the MCA and the projected dwelling yield are outlined in this section. 4.2. LAND BUDGET Table 1 shows the budget of allocated land uses for the MCA. A detailed land budget by title boundary is shown in Appendix A, along with a map showing the location of each title within the MCA. TABLE 1 LAND BUDGET SUMMARY ha Total Precinct Area 553.21 53.21 Roads and Transport 63.01 Encumbered land available for recreation 50.66 Education (State) 11.02 Catholic School 3.47 Gross Developable Area 425.05 Active Open Space - unencumbered 32.42 Passive Open Space - unencumbered 7.75 Wetlands 9.00 Community facilities 1.85 Net Developable Area 374.03 Residential 372.02 Activity Centres 2.01 Source: Armstrong Creek West Precinct Structure Plan, 2011. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 8 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
Contributions are payable on the Net Developable Area of any given site. For the purpose of this DCP, the Net Developable Area of all residential land has been used to determine the development and population projections for the DCP. Net Developable Area is defined as land that can be converted to urban purposes. Urban purposes are those uses that are associated with the establishment of an urban community and will usually include all aspects of residential, commercial and public use. (DPCD, Development Contributions Guidelines, p.44). 4.3. RESIDENTIAL DWELLING YIELD AND POPUL OPULATION Based on an average density of 15 lots per hectare for standard density residential, 20 lots per hectare for medium density residential and an average household size of 2.45 persons per household, the estimated number of dwellings and population in the MCA can be estimated. This information is outlined in Table 2. TABLE 2 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND ESTIMATED POPULATION Ha Dwellings per ha Dwellings Population Sub-Precinct A 148.37 16 2,374 Sub-Precinct B 102.10 15 1,531 Sub-Precinct C 72.51 15 1,088 Sub-Precinct D 20.23 20 405 Sub-Precinct E 11.03 30 331 Sub-Precinct F 8.39 12 101 Mixed Use 9.39 15 141 Residential Total 372.02 5,970 14,626 Source: Armstrong Creek West Precinct Structure Plan, 2011. 4.4. COMM OMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTIONS The Armstrong Creek West Precinct will include a Neighbourhood Activity Centre (NAC) and three Local Activity Centres (LAC). Floorspace estimates for these Activity Centres are preliminary as such for the purposes of this DCP all developable residential and commercial land will be levied based on Net Developable Area. Table 3 shows the Net Developable Area allocated to the NAC and 2 LACs. A third LAC is located within the Department of Transport Station Precinct and is excluded from the Net Developable Area (see detailed Land Budget in Appendix A). TABLE 3 ACTIVITY CENTRE PROJECTIONS NDA (ha) Indicative Retail Floorspace (m 2 ) Indicative Office Floorspace (m 2 ) Neighbourhood Activity Centre 1.26 3,000 500 Local Activity Centres (2) 0.75 2,500 800 Activity Centres Total 2.01 6,500 1,300 Source: Armstrong Creek West Precinct Structure Plan, 2011. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 9 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
4.5. DEMAND UNITS In this DCP, one hectare of Net Developable Area equates to one demand unit. The total number of demand units is shown in Table 4. All development (residential and commercial) contributes to roads, drainage and planning items. The costs of these items are apportioned based on the total demand units. Only residential development contributes to open space, trails and community items. The costs of these items are apportioned based on the residential demand units. TABLE 4 DEMAND UNITS BY LAND USE Development Total (ha) Residential 372.02 Commercial 2.01 Total 374.03 4.6. OTHER USES Where residential land is subdivided into lots that are proposed to be used for a purpose other than a dwelling, a Development Contribution will be levied and must be paid, equivalent to the contribution which would otherwise have been paid if the land had been developed for dwellings. The whole of the land which is subdivided will be assessed on the basis of the demand units for Net Residential Developable Area. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 10 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
5. INFRASTRUCTURE ITEMS TO BE FUNDED BY THE DCP 5.1. DISTINCTION BETWEEN COMMUNITY AND DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE In accordance with the Planning and Environment Act (1987) and the Minister s Direction on Development Contributions, the DCP is required to make a distinction between development and community infrastructure. Items of infrastructure of a community or social nature are to be classified as community infrastructure, whilst all other infrastructure required under the DCP is classified as development infrastructure. Contributions relating to community infrastructure are to be made by the land owner at the time of building approval. Contributions relating to community infrastructure will be paid for at a perdwelling rate. The Planning and Environment Act (1987) stipulates that the amount that may be contributed under a community infrastructure levy is no more than $900 for each dwelling. If this cap is increased by the State Government in the future, Council may collect the un-capped Community Infrastructure Levy specified in this DCP up to the new cap amount. COGG strongly encourages landowners/developers to pay the Community Infrastructure Levy before the Statement of Compliance stage. Contributions relating to development infrastructure are to be made by developers at the time of subdivision. Contributions relating to development infrastructure will be paid at a per-hectare of Net Developable Area rate in respect of the subdivision of residential land. 5.2. EXTERNAL DEMAND The strategic planning undertaken to determine the requirement for infrastructure items within the DCP area has identified that some of the infrastructure items within the DCP generate usage demand from outside the Precinct. Additional information including the apportionment of costs for each infrastructure item is provided in Appendix B: DCP project infrastructure sheets. In all other cases where there is external demand not recovered by a DCP, funds will be sought from alternative sources, including general rates, and Federal and State government funding. 5.3. COMMUNITY INFRAS NFRASTRUCTURE ITEMS Strategic planning undertaken by the City of Greater Geelong has identified a requirement for three (3) community infrastructure items: CI_OS_1 Regional Active Open Space Community Pavilion; CI_OS_2 Neighbourhood Activity Centre Active Open Space - Community Pavilion; and CI_OS_3 Local Activity Centre Active Open Space Community Pavilion. The project number and description of this item has been summarised in Table 8 of this document. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 11 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
5.4. DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE ITEMS Strategic planning undertaken by the City of Greater Geelong has identified a requirement for 51 development infrastructure items. These development infrastructure items can be divided into seven infrastructure categories, being: Land; Roads; Trails; Open Space; Drainage; Community; and Planning. The project number and description of each item has been summarised in Table 8. 5.5. INFRASTRUCTURE LOCATION MAPS The location of each infrastructure project is shown on the maps in Figures 2-6. Appendix B DCP Infrastructure Project Sheets provides further detail on each of these projects in terms of the costing, apportionment and strategic justification of each item. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 12 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 2 LOCATION OF LAND ITEMS ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 13 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 3 LOCATION OF ROAD ITEMS ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 14 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 4 LOCATION OF TRAIL ITEMS ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 15 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 5 LOCATION OF OPEN SPACE ITEMS ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 16 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 6 LOCATION OF DRAINAGE ITEMS ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 17 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
FIGURE 7 LOCATION OF COMMUNITY ITEMS ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 18 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
6. CALCULATION OF LEVIES 6.1. METHOD OF CALCULATING LEVIES The DCP Infrastructure Project Sheets in Appendix B identify the levies assigned to each infrastructure item. The method of calculation is described in this section. 6.1.1. PROJECT COSTS Each item in the DCP has a cost specified for either capital works or land. These costs are listed in Appendix B DCP Infrastructure Project Sheets. The costs have been calculated as at July 2011 and will be indexed annually in accordance with the method specified in this DCP. 6.1.2. EXTERNAL USAGE For some infrastructure projects there is a proportion of usage generated from areas external to the Main Catchment Area of the DCP. For each item in the DCP, the proportion of usage attributable to the external area has been specified in the DCP Infrastructure Project Sheets. The proportion of costs attributable to external use is subtracted from the total project cost of an infrastructure item to give the cost attributable to the Main Catchment Area for each infrastructure item. 6.1.3. COST APPORTIONMENT METHODS The cost of each of the infrastructure items has been apportioned based upon the likelihood that an item will be used by residents of the main catchment area of the DCP. The method and justification for the cost apportionment that has been used for each infrastructure item is outlined in the DCP Infrastructure Project Sheets (Appendix B). 6.2. DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTION RATES PER DEMAND UNIT A summary of the community and development contributions that are required to be made are outlined in Table 5 and Table 6. These contributions are in July 2011 dollars. Table 5 and Table 6 will be indexed annually in accordance with the method specified in this DCP. The required Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) is outlined in Table 5. The Community Infrastructure Levy is subject to the $900 cap per dwelling if the indexed amount exceeds $900 during the life of the DCP. The required Development Infrastructure Levy payable by infrastructure type per hectare of Net Developable Area is outlined in Table 6. All developable land is subject to the Development Infrastructure Levy. Only residential dwellings are subject to the Community Infrastructure Levy. It should be noted that the development infrastructure levy in this DCP includes contributions towards drainage items as the City of Greater Geelong is the drainage authority. This should be taken into account when comparing levies with metropolitan Melbourne development infrastructure levies, which do not include a contribution towards drainage authority infrastructure. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 19 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
TABLE 5 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY PER DWELLING Cost to MCA ($) Dwellings Levy per dwelling ($) Levy per dwelling - after cap ($) 6,990,419.00 5970 1170.93 900 Source: Urban Enterprise, 2011 TABLE 6 DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY PER DEMAND UNIT Cost to MCA ($) Residential levy ($/ha) Commercial levy ($/ha) Land 4,900,000 13,112.47 10,894.85 Roads 10,887,003 29,107.30 29,107.30 Trails 4,687,679 12,600.61 Open Space 26,618,896 71,552.32 Drainage 25,607,452 68,463.63 68,463.63 Community 18,329,897 49,271.27 Other 1,700,000 4,545.09 4,545.09 Total 92,730,926 248,652.69 113,010.87 Source: Urban Enterprise, 2011 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 20 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
7. DCP ADMINISTRATION 7.1. INDEXATION OF LEVIES Land values and construction costs listed in this DCP are in July 2011 dollars. They will be indexed annually according to the following specified method: The Development Contribution for each demand unit must be adjusted as follows: In relation to the costs associated with all infrastructure items other than land, the cost must be adjusted and the contribution amounts recalculated according to the following method: The capital costs of each infrastructure item must be adjusted by reference to the Producer Price Indexes Australia, Victoria (Table 15 Selected Output of Division E - Construction industry, Building Construction Victoria (for buildings) and Road and Bridge Construction Victoria (for roads, bridges, trails, etc) published by the ABS (Series 6427.0) or similar index; The revised infrastructure costs and the adjustment of the contributions must be calculated as at 1 July in each year. In relation to the cost of land required under the Armstrong Creek West Precinct DCP, the land value must be adjusted by adopting a revised land value for each parcel to be acquired based on the same valuation principles. The revised land value and the adjustment of the contributions must be calculated as of 1 July in each year. Within 14 days of the adjustments being made, the Responsible Authority must publish a notice of the amended contributions on its website. If the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) cap (currently $900 per dwelling) is ever increased, the Responsible Authority reserves the right to increase the CIL in this DCP to allow for cost escalation in accordance with the indexation methods in this DCP up to the new CIL cap. The higher levy will be collected from the date the new CIL cap is introduced. 7.2. VALUATION OF LAND Valuations for land to be acquired under this DCP were provided by a qualified independent valuer (Charter Keck Cramer). Land to be acquired was valued based on the before and after method assuming that all usual services (reticulated water, sewerage, electricity, gas, drainage, telecommunications) will be available when the development proceeds. 7.3. COLLECTING AGENCY The City of Greater Geelong is the Collecting Agency pursuant to section 46K of the Planning and Environment Act (1987). 7.4. DEVELOPMENT AGENCY The City of Greater Geelong is the development agency for all infrastructure items pursuant to section 46K of the Planning and Environment Act (1987). ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 21 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
7.5. COLL OLLECTION OF LEVIES The Community Infrastructure levy will be collected by the City of Greater Geelong at the Building Approval Stage in accordance with section 46(0) of the Planning & Environment Act (1987). However, developers/landowners are strongly encouraged to pay the Community Infrastructure Levy before the issue of a Statement of Compliance to simplify collection of development contributions, reduce the administrative burden on COGG and facilitate the early provision of community infrastructure. The Development Infrastructure Levy will be collected by the City of Greater Geelong as follows: For the subdivision of residential land, before the issue of a Statement of Compliance under the Subdivision Act 1988 in respect of the subdivision creating any new residential lot; In relation to the development of commercial land, a planning permit condition must require the payment of the development contribution prior to the commencement of works unless there is an agreement with the Responsible Authority to secure the payment of the development contribution by some other means or other timeframe. The Development Infrastructure Levy will be collected by the Responsible Authority (City of Greater Geelong) before the issue of a Statement of Compliance. A statement of compliance must not be issued until the development infrastructure levy is paid. The Responsible Authority will impose conditions on a planning permit for subdivision or for the development of commercial land to collect the levies generally as follows: FOR SUBDIVISIONS OF RESIDENTIAL LAND A development infrastructure levy must be paid to the Responsible Authority in accordance with the provisions of the approved Development Contribution Plan for the land within the following specified time, namely after Certification of the relevant plan of subdivision but not more than 21 days prior to the issue of a Statement of Compliance in respect of that plan. Where the subdivision is to be developed in stages the development infrastructure levy for that stage only may be paid to the Responsible Authority within the time specified provided that a Schedule of Development Contributions is submitted with each stage plan of subdivision. The schedule must show the amount of development contributions payable for each stage and paid in respect of prior stages to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority. FOR A PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMERCIAL LAND Unless some other arrangement has been agreed to by the Responsible Authority in a section 173 agreement, prior to the commencement of any development, the development infrastructure levy must be paid to the Responsible Authority in accordance with the provisions of the approved DCP for the land. NO PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF LAND Where no planning permit is required for the development of land, unless some other arrangement has been agreed to by the Responsible Authority in a section 173 agreement, prior to the commencement of any development, the development infrastructure levy must be paid to the Responsible Authority in accordance with the provisions of the approved DCP for the land. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 22 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
7.6. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES The City of Greater Geelong s Financial Services Department will undertake ongoing accounting and review of this DCP in terms of: The relevance of projects listed in the DCP; The level of contributions collected; The construction costs of infrastructure projects; The land costs of infrastructure projects; Updating the DCP to reflect any relevant amendments to the Planning and Environment Act (1987), or any new Ministerial Directions relating to development contributions. The City of Greater Geelong Strategic Planning Department will be required to undertake a formal review of this DCP every five years during the lifespan of the DCP. Funds collected through development contributions will be held in a specific interest-bearing reserve account in accordance with the provisions of the Planning and Environment Act (1987). All monies held in this account will be used solely for the provision of infrastructure as itemised in this DCP. If Council resolves not to proceed with any of the infrastructure projects listed in this Development Contribution Plan, the Responsible Authority will comply with section 46(Q) of the Planning & Environment Act (1987). 7.7. METHOD OF O PROVISION Responsibility for the delivery of infrastructure works as described in this DCP resides with the City of Greater Geelong. Infrastructure works may be provided by developers with a credit provided against their development contribution, subject to the agreement of the Responsible Authority. The process by which developers may receive this credit is outlined in Section 8 - Implementation Strategy. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 23 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
8. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 8.1. INTRODUCTION This section provides further details of the implementation of the DCP following on from the Method of Provision outlined in Section 7, particularly with regards to the provision of Land and Works In- Kind. 8.2. PROVISION OF LAND AND WORKS IN-KIND IND As outlined in Section 7, payment of development contributions is to be made in cash. Alternatively, infrastructure works and land may be provided by developers with a credit provided against their development contribution, subject to the agreement of the Responsible Authority. Council may enter into Section 173 Agreements with landowners to formalise details of infrastructure items to be provided in-kind. All development and community infrastructure can be provided in-kind under this agreement. Where a developer intends to construct a building under this DCP in-kind, this must first be agreed to by the Responsible Authority. Any buildings constructed in-kind must be to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority. In determining whether to agree to the provision of works in lieu of cash the Responsible Authority will have regard to the following: Only works or land identified in the DCP can be provided in lieu of cash; Works must be provided to a standard that generally accords with the DCP unless agreed between the Responsible Authority and the developer; Detailed design must be approved by the Responsible Authority and generally accord with the standards outlined in the DCP unless agreed by the Responsible Authority and the developer; The construction of works must be completed to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority. The impact on the DCP must be cost and revenue neutral. Where the Responsible Authority agrees that works are to be provided by a developer in lieu of cash contributions: The credit for the works provided shall equal the value identified in the DCP taking into account the impact of indexation; The value of works provided in accordance with the principles outlined above, will be offset against the development contributions liable to be paid by the developer; The developer will not be required to make cash payments for contributions until the value of any credits for the provision of agreed works-in-kind are exhausted; Where credit for works-in-kind can t be offset against future levy payments, the developer shall be reimbursed by the Responsible Authority for any excess credit at the time of provision in the DCP; ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 24 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
Where a developer chooses to bring forward works ahead of the scheduled time in the DCP, this can be done provided the impact on the DCP is cost and revenue neutral; Where a developer is in credit against their development contributions liability, this credit will be indexed annually in accordance with one of the methods described above. 8.3. LAND Council wishes to obtain land required under the DCP, as an off-set against a developer s development contributions. As with works-in-kind, the provision of land would be agreed in an agreement between the developer and the Responsible Authority pursuant to Section 173 of the Planning and Environment Act (1987). The value of the off-set for providing land will equal the value shown in the DCP, subject to indexation. 8.4. INFRASTRUCTURE ALLOCATION AND STRATEGIC JUSTIFICATION Table 7 provides a summary of the infrastructure items in the DCP, the determination of cost apportionment to the Main Catchment Area and the strategic justification for the item. 8.5. DETAILED CALCULATION OF INFRASTRUCTURE LEVIES Tables 8 and 9 provide details of the levy calculations for each infrastructure item. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 25 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
TABLE 7 INFRASTRUCTURE ITEMS, COST APPORTIONMENT AND STRATEGIC JUSTIFICATION Project ID Project Summary Capital Cost Cost apportionment Strategic Justification Roads DI_RO_1 Intersection - GRR-4C and Connector ( west of Airport Road) $ 1,649,203 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) DI_RO_2 Intersection - GRR-4C and North-South Connector Road $ 1,681,823 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) DI_RO_3 Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Boundary Road $ 3,093,085 60% apportioned to Horseshoe Bend and Major Activity Centre Precincts, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) DI_RO_4 Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and MAC North Access $ 2,920,647 65% apportioned to Major Activity Centre Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) DI_RO_5 Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Main St (MAC) $ 3,135,646 60% apportioned to Major Activity Centre Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) DI_RO_6 Intersection - Surf Coast Highway and Burvilles Road $ 2,665,953 70% apportioned to Major Activity Centre Precinct/Horsham Bend Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) DI_RO_7 DI_RO_8 DI_RO_9 Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Whites Road Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Feehans Road Intersection - NAC (retail/school precinct) $ 2,748,749 $ 2,423,791 $ 378,030 70% apportioned to AC East Precinct; remaining 30% to be apportioned based on NDA between all land owners in the precinct. ACE DCP cost is $2,628,366 (July 2010); indexed from Mar 2010 - Mar 2011 based on PPI. 50% apportioned to AC East Precinct; remaining 50% to be apportioned based on NDA between all land owners in the precinct. ACE cost is $2,317,640 (July 2010); indexed from Mar 2010 - Mar 2011 based on PPI. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 26 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
2011) DI_RO_10 DI_RO_11 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - North-South Connector Creek Road Crossing - Structure - East-West Connector (Main St Extension) $ 404,280 $ 657,614 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Creek crossing required for connection of road network (GTA, 2011) Creek crossing required for connection of road network (GTA, 2011) DI_RO_12 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - Connector Road (west of Airport Road) $ 773,207 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Creek crossing required for connection of road network (GTA, 2011) DI_RO_13 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - North-South Connector to Station Precinct $ 680,086 70% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Creek crossing required for connection of road network (GTA, 2011) Roads Sub- Total Trails DI_TR_1 DI_TR_2 DI_TR_3 Trails Sub- Total Open Space CI_OS_1 DI_OS_1 CI_OS_2 Pedestrian Overpass - Connection to connector road (west of Airport Road) Shared path network - offroad Greenway Improvement Works (Airport Road and Boundary Road) Regional Active Open Space - Community Pavilion - Major Regional Active Open Space - Play Fields NAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (northern) $ 23,212,115 $ 2,513,623 $ 2,039,469 $ 1,391,398 $ 5,944,490 $ 2,782,310 $ 12,743,840 $ 2,782,310 50% apportioned to Council on behalf of existing development, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Identified in the Precinct Structure Plan to provide pedestrian access to the Precinct. Shared path network identified in the Precinct Structure Plan to provide linkages between open space, community facilities, residents and commercial areas. Greenways identified in the Precinct Structure Plan to provide linkages between open space, community facilities, residents and commercial areas, and protection of native vegetation. Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 27 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
DI_OS_2 CI_OS_3 DI_OS_3 DI_OS_5 DI_OS_6 NAC Active Open Space - Play Fields & Bowling Greens (northern) LAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (southern) LAC Active Open Space - Play Fields (southern) Playground Equipment - Regional Park Playground Equipment - Local Parks (5 no.) $ 5,690,749 $ 1,425,799 $ 6,008,526 $ 375,000 $ 500,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). Passive open space facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). Passive open space facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). Passive open space facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). DI_OS_4 NAC - Multiple Purpose Stadium (2 Courts) $ 4,335,936 40% contributed by DEECD as part of school site facilities & 30% contributed by CoGG; remaining 30% apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Stadium identified by DEECD and Council as required to serve the new population and school requirements. Open Space Sub-Total Drainage DI_DR_1 DI_DR_2 DI_DR_3 DI_DR_4 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - Surf Coast Hwy to North-South Connector Rd Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - North- South Connector Road to East-West Connector Rd (Main St Ext) Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - East- West Connector Road (Main St Ext) to Airport Road Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - Airport Road to North-South Connector (west of Airport Road) $ 36,644,470 $ 4,162,304 $ 1,292,215 $ 625,137 $ 1,095,543 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 28 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
DI_DR_5 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - North- South Connector Road (west of Airport Road) to North- South Connection to Station Precinct $ 1,805,804 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) DI_DR_6 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - North- South Connection to Station Precinct to Ghazeepore Road $ 987,456 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) DI_LA_1 DI_LA_2 DI_LA_3 DI_LA_4 DI_LA_5 DI_LA_6 DI_LA_7 DI_LA_8 DI_LA_9 DI_LA_10 DI_DR_7 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 1) - land Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 2) - land Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 3) - land Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 4) - land Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 5) - land Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 5A) - land Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 6) - land Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 7) - land Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (property 15) - land Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (property 22) - land Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB1)- construction $ 1,425,000 $ 25,000 $ 1,075,000 $ 225,000 $ 500,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 75,000 $ 575,000 $ 2,923,845 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 29 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
DI_DR_8 DI_DR_9 DI_DR_10 DI_DR_11 DI_DR_12 DI_DR_13 DI_DR_14 DI_DR_15 Drainage Sub- Total Community Facility DI_C_1 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB2)- construction Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB3)- construction Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB4)- construction Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB5)- construction Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB6)- construction Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB7)- construction Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB8)- construction Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (SB2)- construction Community Complex - NAC - Construction $ 1,239,034 $ 1,962,059 $ 3,239,944 $ 1,441,418 $ 1,737,178 $ 1,544,707 $ 1,990,518 $ 1,504,691 $ 31,626,853 $ 9,877,478 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). Community land and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (Sustainable Communities - Infrastructure Development Guidelines City of Greater Geelong, October 2010) DI_LA_11 Community Complex - NAC - Land $ 525,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Community land and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (Sustainable Communities - Infrastructure Development Guidelines City of Greater Geelong, October 2010) DI_C_2 Community Complex - LAC - Construction $ 8,452,419 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Community land and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (Sustainable Communities - Infrastructure Development Guidelines City of Greater Geelong, October 2010) ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 30 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
DI_LA_12 Community Complex - LAC - Land $ 300,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Community land and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (Sustainable Communities - Infrastructure Development Guidelines City of Greater Geelong, October 2010) Community Facility Sub- Total Planning $ 19,154,897 DI_O_1 PSP/DCP Preparation $ 1,700,000 Planning Sub- Total $ 1,700,000 TOTAL $118,282,825 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Item required for comprehensive planning for the precinct. ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 31 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
TABLE 8 DEVELOPMENT INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY CALCULATION BY INFRASTRUCTURE ITEM Project ID Category Project Summary Capital Cost External Cost to MCA Dev. type contributing Demand Units Levy DI_RO_1 DI_RO_2 Roads Roads Intersection - GRR-4C and Connector ( west of Airport Road) $ 1,649,203.00 50% $ 824,601.50 All Development 374.03 $ 2,204.64 Intersection - GRR-4C and North-South Connector Road $ 1,681,823.00 0% $ 1,681,823.00 All Development 374.03 $ 4,496.49 DI_RO_3 Roads Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Boundary Road $ 3,093,085.00 60% $ 1,237,234.00 All Development 374.03 $ 3,307.85 DI_RO_4 Roads Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and MAC North Access $ 2,920,647.00 65% $ 1,022,226.45 All Development 374.03 $ 2,733.01 DI_RO_5 Roads Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Main St (MAC) $ 3,135,646.00 60% $ 1,254,258.40 All Development 374.03 $ 3,353.36 DI_RO_6 Roads Intersection - Surf Coast Highway and Burvilles Road $ 2,665,953.00 70% $ 799,785.90 All Development 374.03 $ 2,138.29 DI_RO_7 Roads Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Whites Road $ 2,748,749.18 70% $ 824,624.75 All Development 374.03 $ 2,204.70 DI_RO_8 Roads Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Feehans Road $ 2,423,791.45 50% $ 1,211,895.73 All Development 374.03 $ 3,240.10 DI_RO_9 Roads Intersection - NAC (retail/school precinct) $ 378,030.00 0% $ 378,030.00 All Development 374.03 $ 1,010.69 DI_RO_10 DI_RO_11 DI_RO_12 DI_RO_13 DI_TR_1 Roads Roads Roads Roads Trails Creek Road Crossing - Structure - North-South Connector $ 404,280.00 0% $ 404,280.00 All Development 374.03 $ 1,080.88 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - East-West Connector (Main St Extension) $ 657,614.00 0% $ 657,614.00 All Development 374.03 $ 1,758.19 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - Connector Road (west of Airport Road) $ 773,207.00 50% $ 386,603.50 All Development 374.03 $ 1,033.62 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - North-South Connector to Station Precinct $ 680,086.00 70% $ 204,025.80 All Development 374.03 $ 545.48 Pedestrian Overpass - Connection to connector road (west of Airport Road) $ 2,513,623.00 50% $ 1,256,811.50 Residential Only 372.02 $ 3,378.34 DI_TR_2 Trails Shared path network - offroad $ 2,039,469.00 0% $ 2,039,469.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 5,482.15 DI_TR_3 Trails Greenway Improvement Works (Airport Road and $ 1,391,398.00 0% $ 1,391,398.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 3,740.12 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 32 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
Boundary Road) CI_OS_1 Open Space Regional Active Open Space - Community Pavilion - Major $ 2,782,310.00 0% $ 2,782,310.00 Residential Only 5,969.99 $ 466.05 DI_OS_1 Open Space Regional Active Open Space - Play Fields $ 12,743,840.00 0% $ 12,743,840.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 34,255.79 CI_OS_2 DI_OS_2 CI_OS_3 Open Space Open Space Open Space NAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (northern) $ 2,782,310.00 0% $ 2,782,310.00 Residential Only 5,969.99 $ 466.05 NAC Active Open Space - Play Fields & Bowling Greens (northern) $ 5,690,749.00 0% $ 5,690,749.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 15,296.89 LAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (southern) $ 1,425,799.00 0% $ 1,425,799.00 Residential Only 5,969.99 $ 238.83 DI_OS_3 Open Space LAC Active Open Space - Play Fields (southern) $ 6,008,526.00 0% $ 6,008,526.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 16,151.08 DI_OS_5 Open Space Playground Equipment - Regional Park $ 375,000.00 0% $ 375,000.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 1,008.01 DI_OS_6 Open Space Playground Equipment - Local Parks (5 no.) $ 500,000.00 0% $ 500,000.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 1,344.01 DI_OS_4 Open Space NAC - Multiple Purpose Stadium (2 Courts) $ 4,335,936.00 70% $ 1,300,780.80 Residential Only 372.02 $ 3,496.53 DI_DR_1 DI_DR_2 DI_DR_3 DI_DR_4 DI_DR_5 DI_DR_6 DI_LA_1 Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - Surf Coast Hwy to North-South Connector Rd $ 4,162,304.00 0% $ 4,162,304.00 All Development 374.03 $ 11,128.26 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - North-South Connector Road to East-West Connector Rd (Main St Ext) $ 1,292,215.00 0% $ 1,292,215.00 All Development 374.03 $ 3,454.84 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - East-West Connector Road (Main St Ext) to Airport Road $ 625,137.00 0% $ 625,137.00 All Development 374.03 $ 1,671.36 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - Airport Road to North-South Connector (west of Airport Road) $ 1,095,543.00 50% $ 547,771.50 All Development 374.03 $ 1,464.51 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - North-South Connector Road (west of Airport Road) to North-South Connection to Station Precinct $ 1,805,804.00 50% $ 902,902.00 All Development 374.03 $ 2,413.98 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - North-South Connection to Station Precinct to Ghazeepore Road $ 987,456.00 50% $ 493,728.00 All Development 374.03 $ 1,320.02 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 1) - land $ 1,425,000.00 0% $ 1,425,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 3,809.85 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 33 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
DI_LA_2 DI_LA_3 DI_LA_4 DI_LA_5 DI_LA_6 DI_LA_7 DI_LA_8 DI_LA_9 DI_LA_10 DI_DR_7 DI_DR_8 DI_DR_9 DI_DR_10 DI_DR_11 DI_DR_12 DI_DR_13 Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 2) - land $ 25,000.00 0% $ 25,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 66.84 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 3) - land $ 1,075,000.00 0% $ 1,075,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 2,874.10 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 4) - land $ 225,000.00 0% $ 225,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 601.56 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 5) - land $ 500,000.00 0% $ 500,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 1,336.79 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 5A) - land $ 25,000.00 0% $ 25,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 66.84 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 6) - land $ 50,000.00 0% $ 50,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 133.68 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 7) - land $ 100,000.00 0% $ 100,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 267.36 Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (property 15) - land $ 75,000.00 0% $ 75,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 200.52 Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (property 22) - land $ 575,000.00 0% $ 575,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 1,537.31 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB1) - construction $ 2,923,845.00 0% $ 2,923,845.00 All Development 374.03 $ 7,817.14 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB2) - construction $ 1,239,034.00 0% $ 1,239,034.00 All Development 374.03 $ 3,312.66 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB3) - construction $ 1,962,059.00 0% $ 1,962,059.00 All Development 374.03 $ 5,245.73 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB4) - construction $ 3,239,944.00 0% $ 3,239,944.00 All Development 374.03 $ 8,662.26 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB5) - construction $ 1,441,418.00 0% $ 1,441,418.00 All Development 374.03 $ 3,853.75 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB6) - construction $ 1,737,178.00 0% $ 1,737,178.00 All Development 374.03 $ 4,644.49 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB7) - construction $ 1,544,707.00 0% $ 1,544,707.00 All Development 374.03 $ 4,129.90 DI_DR_14 Drainage Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins $ 1,990,518.00 0% $ 1,990,518.00 All Development 374.03 $ 5,321.81 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 34 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
(WLRB8) - construction DI_DR_15 Drainage Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (SB2) - construction $ 1,504,691.00 0% $ 1,504,691.00 All Development 374.03 $ 4,022.92 DI_C_1 DI_LA_11 DI_C_2 DI_LA_12 Community Facilities Community Complex - NAC - Construction $ 9,877,478.00 0% $ 9,877,478.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 26,550.93 Community facilities Community Complex - NAC - Land $ 525,000.00 0% $ 525,000.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 1,411.21 Community Facilities Community Complex - LAC - Construction $ 8,452,419.00 0% $ 8,452,419.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 22,720.33 Community facilities Community Complex - LAC - Land $ 300,000.00 0% $ 300,000.00 Residential Only 372.02 $ 806.41 DI_O_1 Other PSP/DCP Preparation $ 1,700,000.00 0% $ 1,700,000.00 All Development 374.03 $ 4,545.09 Total DIL $ 248,652.69 TABLE 9 COMMUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE LEVY CALCULATION BY INFRASTRUCTURE ITEM Project ID Category Project Summary Capital Cost External Cost to MCA Dev. type contributing Demand Units Levy (per dwelling) ling) CI_OS_1 CI_OS_2 CI_OS_3 Open Space Open Space Open Space Regional Active Open Space - Community Pavilion - Major $ 2,782,310.00 0% $ 2,782,310.00 Residential Only 5,970 $ 466.05 NAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (northern) $ 2,782,310.00 0% $ 2,782,310.00 Residential Only 5,970 $ 466.05 LAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (southern) $ 1,425,799.00 0% $ 1,425,799.00 Residential Only 5,970 $ 238.83 Total CIL $ 1,170.93 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 35 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
8.6. DCP SUMMARY TABLES The following summary tables serve as a quick reference guide. For more detail on any of these items refer to the appropriate section of this document. All dollar values shown in this table are current as of July 2011 and are subject to indexation and review in accordance with the methods outlined within Section 7 of this document. TABLE 10 SUMMARY OF LAND USE Land Use Net Developable Area Residential 372.02 Commercial 2.01 Total 374.03 TABLE 11 SUMMARY OF LEVIES PAYABLE (JULY 2011 VALUES) Levy to be Collected DIL (per hectare of residential land) $ 248,652.69 DIL (per hectare of commercial land) $ 113,010.87 CIL (per dwelling) $ 900.00 TABLE 12 SUMMARY OF COSTS APPORTIONED AND FUNDS TO BE COLLECTED (JULY 2011 VALUES) Internal External Total Development Infrastructure Total DIL Cost Apportioned $ 92,730,926 $ 18,561,480 $ 111,292,406 Total DIL Funds to be Collected under the DCP $ 92,730,926 $ - $ 92,730,926 Community Infrastructure Total CIL Cost Apportioned $ 6,990,419 $ 6,990,419 Total CIL Funds to be Collected under the DCP $ 5,373,000 $ - $ 5,373,000 All Infrastructure Total Cost Apportioned $ 99,721,345 $ 18,561,480 $ 118,282,825 Total Funds to be Collected under DCP $ 98,103,926 $ - $ 98,103,926 ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 36 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
APPENDICES ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 37 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
Appendix A. DETAILED LAND BUDGET ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 38 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011
32 43 42 41 33 61 25 26 27 28 30 31 40 38 39 37 34 35 36 23 29 Ghazeepore Road 24 22 10 9 8 21 20 19 18 17 Boundary Road 7 6 5 Whites Road Airport Road 16 15 14 13 12 11 4 3 1 2 Surf Coast Boulevard Burvilles Road Williams Road 53 52 51 49 50 49 44 45 46 60 47 PRECINCT BOUNDARY 59 58 54 57 56 55 Stewarts Road Feehans Road Plan 21 Armstrong Creek West Precinct Urban Structure September 2011 Mesh Pty Ltd 2011 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without the written permission from Mesh Pty Ltd, Level 1, 6 Riverside Quay South bank VIC 3006. 1:7500 @ A1 0 500 1000 m
DI_RO_7 Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Whites Road Description Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Whites Road Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Roads Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $2,748,749 First subdivision requiring access via Whites Road Strategic Justification Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 70% $824,625 70% apportioned to AC East Precinct; remaining 30% to be apportioned based on NDA between all land owners in the precinct. ACE DCP cost is $2,628,366 (July 2010); indexed from Mar 2010 - Mar 2011 based on PPI. 374.03 $2,204.70 Armstrong Creek East Precinct DCP Ref# Version 2.1 12 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_RO_8 Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Feehans Road Description Intersection - Surf Coast Hwy and Feehans Road Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Roads Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $2,423,791 First subdivision requiring access via Feehans Road Strategic Justification Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 50% $1,211,896 50% apportioned to AC East Precinct; remaining 50% to be apportioned based on NDA between all land owners in the precinct. ACE cost is $2,317,640 (July 2010); indexed from Mar 2010 - Mar 2011 based on PPI. 374.03 $3,240.10 Armstrong Creek East Precinct DCP Ref# Version 2.1 13 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_RO_9 Intersection - NAC (retail/school precinct) Description Intersection - NAC (retail/school precinct) Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Roads Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $378,030 Development of the NAC Strategic Justification Intersection identified in transport and engineering planning as required for appropriate traffic management in the precinct (GTA, 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $378,030 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $1,010.69 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 14 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_RO_10 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - North-South Connector Description Creek Road Crossing - Structure - North-South Connector Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Roads Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $404,280 Construction of the North South Connector Road on both sides of the creek. Strategic Justification Creek crossing required for connection of road network (GTA, 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $404,280 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $1,080.88 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 15 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_RO_11 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - East-West Connector (Main St Extension) Description Creek Road Crossing - Structure - East-West Connector (Main St Extension) Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Roads Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $657,614 Construction of Main St on both sides of the creek. Strategic Justification Creek crossing required for connection of road network (GTA, 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $657,614 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $1,758.19 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 16 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_RO_12 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - Connector Road (west of Airport Road) Description Creek Road Crossing - Structure - Connector Road (west of Airport Road) Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Roads Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $773,207 Construction of the Connector Road on both sides of the creek. Strategic Justification Creek crossing required for connection of road network (GTA, 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 50% $386,604 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $1,033.62 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 17 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_RO_13 Creek Road Crossing - Structure - North-South Connector to Station Precinct Description Creek Road Crossing - Structure - North-South Connector to Station Precinct Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Roads Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $680,086 Construction of the Connector Road on both sides of the creek. Strategic Justification Creek crossing required for connection of road network (GTA, 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 70% $204,026 70% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $545.48 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 18 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_TR_1 Pedestrian Overpass - Connection to connector road (west of Airport Road) Description Pedestrian Overpass - Connection to connector road (west of Airport Road) Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Trails Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification $2,513,623 No later than 2,000 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Identified in the Precinct Structure Plan to provide pedestrian access to the Precinct. External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 50% $1,256,812 50% apportioned to Council on behalf of existing development, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $3,378.34 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 20 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_TR_2 Shared path network - offroad Description 2.5m concrete shared paths within road reserves (8,470m, $1,720,469) and within greenways ($319,000) Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Trails Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $2,039,469 Progressive implementation as subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs Shared path network identified in the Precinct Structure Plan to provide linkages between open space, community facilities, residents and commercial areas. 0% $2,039,469 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $5,482.15 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 21 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_TR_3 Greenway Improvement Works (Airport Road and Boundary Road) Description Greenway Improvement Works (Airport Road and Boundary Road) Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Trails Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,391,398 Progressive implementation as subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs Greenways identified in the Precinct Structure Plan to provide linkages between open space, community facilities, residents and commercial areas, and protection of native vegetation. 0% $1,391,398 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $3,740.12 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 22 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
CI_OS_1 Regional Active Open Space - Community Pavilion - Major Description Multi-purpose pavilion for community use and potentially local cricket, football and soccer clubs Infrastructure Type Community Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $2,782,310 No later than 3,000 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). 0% $2,782,310 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 5,970.0 $466.05 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 24 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_OS_1 Regional Active Open Space - Play Fields Description Includes 4 grass soccer pitches, 2 synthetic soccer/hockey pitches, 10 tennis courts (must accommodate 18 ultimate) and associated civil works Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $12,743,840 No later than 3,000 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). 0% $12,743,840 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $34,255.79 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 25 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
CI_OS_2 NAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (northern) Description NAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (northern) Infrastructure Type Community Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $2,782,310 No later than 2,000 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). 0% $2,782,310 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 5,970 $466.05 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 26 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_OS_2 NAC Active Open Space - Play Fields & Bowling Greens (northern) Description 2 ovals and 2 netball courts, plus 2 synthetic bowling greens and associated civil works Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $5,690,749 No later than 2,000 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). 0% $5,690,749 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $15,296.89 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 27 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
CI_OS_3 LAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (southern) Description LAC Active Open Space - Community Pavilion (southern) Infrastructure Type Community Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $1,425,799 No later than 3,500 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Active open space land, fields and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). 0% $1,425,799 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 5,970 $238.83 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 28 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_OS_3 LAC Active Open Space - Play Fields (southern) Description Construction of 2 ovals and 2 netball courts, and associated civil works within the NAC Active Open Space Reserve. Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification $6,008,526 No later than 3,500 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Passive open space facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $6,008,526 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $16,151.08 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 29 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_OS_5 Playground Equipment - Regional Park Description Construction of a Regional Playground facility. Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification $375,000 No later than 2,000 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Passive open space facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $375,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $1,008.01 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 30 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_OS_6 Playground Equipment - Local Parks (5 no.) Description Construction of local playgrounds in various passive open space reserves (refer Infrastructure Maps for locations) Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $500,000 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Passive open space facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (identified in Precinct Structure Plan). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $500,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $1,344.01 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 31 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_OS_4 NAC - Multiple Purpose Stadium (2 Courts) Description 2 court multipurpose stadium. Located on State School site on north of Armstrong Creek. 40% contributed by DEECD as part of school site facilities Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Open Space Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification $4,335,936 2,500 dwellings occupied or once the relevant school enrolment trigger for this type of facility is reached. Stadium identified by DEECD and Council as required to serve the new population and school requirements. External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 70% $1,300,781 40% contributed by DEECD as part of school site facilities & 30% contributed by CoGG; remaining 30% apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. 372.02 $3,496.53 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 32 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_1 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - Surf Coast Hwy to North- South Connector Rd Description Construction of drainage item from Surf Coast Hwy to North-South Connector Rd. Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification $4,162,304 First subdivision east of Airport Road Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $4,162,304 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $11,128.26 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 34 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars. Version 2.1
DI_DR_4 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - Airport Road to North-South Connector (west of Airport Road) Description Construction of drainage item from Airport Road to North-South Connector (west of Airport Road). Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Infrastructure Type Development $1,095,543 First subdivision west of Airport Road Infrastructure Category Drainage Strategic Justification Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 50% $547,772 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $1,464.51 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 37 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_5 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - North-South Connector Road (west of Airport Road) to North-South Connection to Station Precinct Description Construction of drainage item from North-South Connector (west of Airport Road) to North-South Connection to Station Precinct. Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Infrastructure Type Development $1,805,804 First subdivision west of Airport Road Infrastructure Category Drainage Strategic Justification Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 50% $902,902 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $2,413.98 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 38 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_6 Armstrong Creek Waterway Improvement Works - North-South Connection to Station Precinct to Ghazeepore Road Description Construction of drainage item from North-South Connection to Station Precinct to Ghazeepre Road. Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Infrastructure Type Development $987,456 First subdivision west of Airport Road Infrastructure Category Drainage Strategic Justification Waterway improvement works required for Armstrong Creek as identified by Water Technology (October 2011) and Neil Craigie (October 2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 50% $493,728 50% apportioned to Western Employment Precinct, remainder to be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $1,320.02 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 39 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_1 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 1) - land Description Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 1) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,425,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,425,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $3,809.85 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 40 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_2 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 2) - land Description Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 2) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $25,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $25,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $66.84 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 41 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_3 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 3) - land Description Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 3) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,075,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,075,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $2,874.10 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 42 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_4 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 4) - land Description Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (proeprty 4) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $225,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $225,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $601.56 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 43 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_5 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 5) - land Description Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 5) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $500,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $500,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $1,336.79 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 44 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_6 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 5A) - land Description Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 5A) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $25,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $25,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $66.84 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 45 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_7 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 6) - land Description Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 6) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $50,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $50,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $133.68 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 46 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_8 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 7) - land Description Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (property 7) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $100,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $100,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $267.36 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 47 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_9 Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (property 15) - land Description Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (property 15) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $75,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $75,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $200.52 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 48 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_10 Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (property 22) - land Description Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (property 22) - land Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $575,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for works is reached. Strategic Justification Land required for wetlands and retarding basins as identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011) External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $575,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $1,537.31 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 49 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_7 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB1) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB1). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $2,923,845 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $2,923,845 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $7,817.14 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 50 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_8 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB2) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB2). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,239,034 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,239,034 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $3,312.66 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 51 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_9 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB3) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB3). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,962,059 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,962,059 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $5,245.73 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 52 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_10 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB4) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB4). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $3,239,944 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $3,239,944 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $8,662.26 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 53 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_11 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB5) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB5). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,441,418 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,441,418 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $3,853.75 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 54 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_12 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB6) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB6). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,737,178 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,737,178 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $4,644.49 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 55 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_13 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB7) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB7). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,544,707 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,544,707 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $4,129.90 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 56 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_14 Drainage Works - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB8) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Wetland/retarding basins (WLRB8). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,990,518 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,990,518 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $5,321.81 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 57 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_DR_15 Drainage Works - Sedimentation Basin (SB2) - construction Description Construction of drainage item - Sedimentation Basin (SB2). Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Drainage Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger $1,504,691 As subdivision occurs. Strategic Justification Wetlands/retarding basins identified by Water Technology and Neil Craigie (2011). External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,504,691 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $4,022.92 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 58 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_C_1 Community Complex - NAC - Construction Description Community Complex - NAC - Construction Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Community Facilities Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $9,877,478 No later than 2,000 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Community land and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (Sustainable Communities - Infrastructure Development Guidelines 0% $9,877,478 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $26,550.93 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 60 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_11 Community Complex - NAC - Land Description Community Complex - NAC - Land acquisition - 1.25ha Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Community facilities Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $525,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for development of the facility is reached. Community land and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (Sustainable Communities - Infrastructure Development Guidelines 0% $525,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $1,411.21 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 61 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_C_2 Community Complex - LAC - Construction Description Community Complex - LAC - Construction Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Community Facilities Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $8,452,419 No later than 3,500 dwellings occupied or at the discretion of the Responsible Authority for early provision. Community land and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (Sustainable Communities - Infrastructure Development Guidelines 0% $8,452,419 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $22,720.33 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 62 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_LA_12 Community Complex - LAC - Land Description Community Complex - LAC - Land acquisition - 0.6ha Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Community facilities Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs $300,000 As subdivision occurs or when the trigger for development of the facility is Community land and facilities required to serve the new resident population in line with Growth Area guidelines (Sustainable Communities - Infrastructure Development Guidelines 0% $300,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 372.02 $806.41 Charter Keck Cramer Land valuation report (4/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 63 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
DI_O_1 PSP/DCP Preparation Description PSP/DCP Preparation Infrastructure Type Development Infrastructure Category Other Project Cost Indicative Provision Trigger Strategic Justification $1,700,000 Complete Item required for comprehensive planning for the precinct. External Usage Discount Project Cost to MCA Apportionment of Costs 0% $1,700,000 To be apportioned based on NDA between all landowners in the precinct. Demand Units Levy Amount Costing Source 374.03 $4,545.09 Prowse QS Costings (3/11/11) Ref# Version 2.1 65 NOVEMBER 2011 The Project Cost is expressed in July 2011 dollars.
Appendix C. INTERSECTION AND DRAINAGE PLANS ARMSTRONG CREEK WEST PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTIONS PLAN CITY OF GREATER GEELONG 40 URBAN ENTERPRISE PTY LTD NOVEMBER 2011