APPENDIX G REAL ESTATE

Similar documents
JANUARY 2016 MAMARONECK & SHELDRAKE RIVERS NEW YORK FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK APPENDIX E

Appendix B Draft Real Estate Plan

DRAFT INTEGRATED FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

APPENDIX D - REAL ESTATE

Appendix G. Non-Federal Letters of Support and Draft Real Estate Plan

Appendix B Real Estate Plan

Draft Continuing Authorities Program Section 1135 Detailed Project Report and Integrated Environmental Assessment

Appendix C. Real Estate. Brazos Island Harbor, Texas Channel Improvement Project Cameron County, Texas

Delaware River Basin Comprehensive Flood Risk Management Interim Feasibility Study and Integrated Environmental Assessment for New Jersey

EDISTO BEACH COASTAL STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION GENERAL INVESTIGATION STUDY APPENDIX K REAL ESTATE

INDIANA HARBOR AND CANAL CONFINED DISPOSAL FACILITY EAST CHICAGO, INDIANA

APPENDIX M. Real Estate Plan

APPENDIX C REAL ESTATE PLAN BOULEVARD RESACA, BROWNSVILLE, TX CAMERON COUNTY, TEXAS

Appendix H: Real Estate Plan

MAMARONECK AND SHELDRAKE RIVER FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECT MAMARONECK, NEW YORK APPENDIX E REAL ESTATE PLAN

WEST SHORE LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN HURRICANE AND STORM DAMAGE RISK REDUCTION STUDY INTEGRATED DRAFT FEASIBILITY REPORT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

DRAFT REAL ESTATE PLAN APPENDIX D JEFFERSON COUNTY ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY

Appendix K. Real Estate Plan

APPENDIX E REAL ESTATE PLAN

Draft Appendix E. Real Estate Plan. Rahway River Basin, New Jersey Flood Risk Management Feasibility Study. November 2016

REAL ESTATE PLAN APPENDIX G

APPENDIX F REAL ESTATE

HASHAMOMUCK COVE, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK COASTAL STORM RISK MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDIX F REAL ESTATE PLAN

Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/Environmental Impact Report (EIR) APPENDIX H Real Estate Cost

Draft Integrated Feasibility Report and Environmental Assessment and Draft Finding of No Significant Impact

APPENDIX H REAL ESTATE REQUIREMENTS

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION FEASIBILITY REPORT WITH INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

DRAFT East Rockaway Inlet to Rockaway Inlet and Jamaica Bay. Atlantic Coast of New York

Appendix J. Real Estate Plan

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON, D.C

UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESTORATION FEASIBILITY REPORT WITH INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Appendix D Real Estate Plan

APPENDIX D REAL ESTATE PLAN

HUNTING BAYOU FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS DRAFT GENERAL REEVALUATION REPORT AND INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Southwest Coastal Louisiana Study

Appendix D: Real Estate

GENERAL RE-EVALUATION REPORT APPENDIX B: REAL ESTATE SAVANNAH HARBOR EXPANSION PROJECT Chatham County, Georgia and Jasper County, South Carolina

APPENDIX H. Real Estate Plan

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District APPENDIX E CHARLESTON HARBOR POST 45 CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA. Real Estate

Final General Reevaluation Report and Final Environmental Impact Statement. Hurricane Protection and Beach Erosion Control

Real Estate Plan Beaver Lake Water Supply Reallocation White River Rogers, Arkansas. 20 April 2017

Dredged Material Management Plan Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway Port Royal Sound, South Carolina to Cumberland Sound, Georgia November 2015

DRAFT REAL ESTATE PLAN APPENDIX C GULF INTRACOASTAL WATERWAY BRAZOS RIVER FLOODGATES AND COLORADO RIVER LOCKS SYSTEMS FEASIBILITY STUDY

REAL ESTATE PLAN. Final Integrated General Reevaluation Report and Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF ENGINEERS WASHINGTON. D.C MAR

Skagit River Flood Risk Management General Investigation Skagit County, Washington. Draft Feasibility Report and Environmental Impact Statement

APPENDIX F REAL ESTATE PLAN. Redwood City Harbor Navigation Improvement Feasibility Study, Redwood City, California

BEACH STORM DAMAGE REDUCTION EASEMENT

CENAN-RE 22 May MEMORANDUM FOR Chief, Planning Division, ATTN: CENAN-PL-F (Alek Petersen)

Downtown Montauk Stabilization Project. Real Estate Plan Appendix

Submittal of the Minutes from the March 9, 2011, April 5, 2011, and April 19, 2011 Cabinet Meetings.

AGREEMENT TO ACQUIRE LANDS BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY ST. PAUL DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND. THE CITY OF City, State

APPENDIX H REAL ESTATE PLAN

Appendix C REAL ESTATE PLAN

AMENDED DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, SAVANNAH DISTRICT 100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVENUE SAVANNAH, GEORGIA

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC Regulation No May 2015

Shoreline Use Permits

PUGET SOUND NEARSHORE ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS made this day of, 200_, by ( Declarant ). RECITALS

THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS is made this day of, 20, by ("Covenantor"). RECITALS

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

REAL ESTATE PLAN APPENDIX G

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

MODEL DEED RESTRICTION FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMIT-3 (PASPGP-3) DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS FOR CONSERVATION

Federal Mandates and Willing Sellers: Real Estate Acquisition for the Missouri River Recovery Program

DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the Town of Jupiter ( Town ) has adopted a Comprehensive Plan

Mississippi River Ship Channel Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Integrated General Reevaluation Report And Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

1. GENERAL 2. REAL ESTATE REQUIREMENTS

Stormwater Ordinance Appendix APPENDIX K EXAMPLE TAR-PAM CONVERSATION EASEMENT

APPENDIX D REAL ESTATE DRAFT. MOBILE HARBOR, MOBILE, ALABAMA Integrated General Reevaluation Report With Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement

Land Management Plan Fargo-Moorhead (FM) Area Flood Risk Reduction Project Version 1

First Name Last Name. Company Name (if applicable) Street Address City State Zip. Owner Phone. . First Name Last Name

Town of Jupiter Island Delegated Mangrove Authority For the State of Florida

2Q. We have owned this property for many years, why are we just now hearing about this?

City of East Providence

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

DWR REAL ESTATE COORDINATION PLAN

Appendix F. Real Estate

***** Subchapter A. GENERAL PROVISIONS ***** PERMIT APPLICATIONS

CURRENT THROUGH PL , APPROVED 11/11/2009

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

County of Henrico, Virginia. Buffer Management Plan. Cobbs Creek Regional Water Supply Reservoir. Task 2.1. August 21, 2013.

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Selection Criteria Form

APPLICATION. Telephone Fax Address. Telephone Fax Address FOR MARTIN COUNTY USE ONLY

CONSERVATION EASEMENT INCLUDING MITIGATION

Application Procedures for Easements or Rights of Way on City of Fort Collins Natural Areas and Conserved Lands March 2012

SEQRA (For Land Surveyors) Purpose of this Presentation

NARRATIVE (GUIDELINES)

ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA South Ponte Vedra Beach, Vilano Beach, and Summer Haven Reaches

Easement Criteria Evaluation Project: Black Gum Mitigation Bank southern Upshur County, Texas

Conservation Easement Stewardship

THIS DEED OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT

BOUNDARY MANAGEMENT AND ENCROACHMENTS

Establishing a Wetland Bank in Minnesota

Upper Southampton Township US ACOE USF&WS UNH

Conservation Design Subdivisions

Article III. Erosion and Sedimentation Control

MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISPOSAL OF UNCOMTAMINATED CONCRETE

Transcription:

BUBBLY CREEK, SOUTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDIX G REAL ESTATE DRAFT - NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION APRIL 2015

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District Appendix G Real Estate Bubbly Creek, Chicago, Illinois

BUBBLY CREEK, SOUTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION FEASIBILITY STUDY APPENDIX G REAL ESTATE April 2015 Attachment 1: Real Estate Planning Report Exhibit A: Bubbly Creek Project Maps List of Attachments and Exhibits Exhibit B: Bubbly Creek Environmental Investigation Findings Map Exhibit C: Detroit Real Estate Assessment of Non-Federal Sponsor s Real Estate Acquisition Capability U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District Appendix G Real Estate Bubbly Creek, Chicago, Illinois

ATTACHMENT 1: Real Estate Planning Report U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District Appendix G Real Estate Bubbly Creek, Chicago, Illinois

BUBBLY CREEK SOUTH BRANCH OF THE CHICAGO RIVER, ILLINOIS FEASIBILITY STUDY ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT REAL ESTATE PLANNING REPORT UPDATED 10 SEPTEMBER 2014 APPENDIX G Real Estate Division Chicago District U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 1

Authority: This study is being conducted in accordance with the study resolution adopted by the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, July 20, 2005, which reads: Resolved by the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the United States Senate that, the Secretary of the Army is requested to review the report of the Chief of Engineers on the Illinois River, Illinois submitted in Senate Document Numbered 126, Seventy-first Congress, second session, and other pertinent reports, to determine whether any modifications to the South Fork of the South Branch of the Chicago River (commonly known as Bubbly Creek) for ecosystem restoration is advisable at this time. 1. PURPOSE This Real Estate Plan is prepared in support of the feasibility study of the Bubbly Creek ecosystem restoration study. The Real Estate Plan identifies and describes the area proposed for construction, operation and maintenance of the Project, in addition to the real estate requirements and procedures for implementation of a recommended Plan. LRD approved the Project Management Plan on May 23, 2003. 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The South Fork of the South Branch (SFSB) of the Chicago River, known as Bubbly Creek, is a 6,600 foot long channel that begins near Racine Avenue and 38 th Street, along the north side of the Racine Avenue Pump Station (RAPS) and flows north to the South Branch of the Chicago River. Once a thriving wetland system that provided natural aquatic and terrestrial habitats for fish, birds, and mammal species, the SFSB has endured major physical alterations including deepening and widening of the channel, creation of sheet pile banks, complete filling of wetlands, severe hydrologic alterations and the introduction of polluted sediments and runoff. The Project will address the severe hydrologic alterations, contaminated sediments, poor water quality and other impacts upon the ecosystem that are prevalent in the Project watershed by improving waterflow and sediment conditions, habitat restoration and by providing a more diverse aquatic and related habitat structure. This will be accomplished through the placement of substrate within the turning basin and channel via small barge followed by an 8 inch layer of rounded river rock. Cobbles and boulders will then be places around structures or nonconformities to provide additional protection against high flow velocities. Riparian, emergent and submergent native plant communities will be established over the remainder of the construction area and nonnative and invasive vegetation will be removed by hand cutting and herbiciding. Woody debris piles consisting of trees greater than 4 inches in diameter will be placed along designated areas within the channel to provide aquatic habitat and protect emergent plantings from high flow velocities. Woody debris will be acquired from the riparian zone where invasive and nonnative species will be removed. 3. LER REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE The following table references the owner, acreage, and recommended estate for each parcel of land. A total of 33.37 acres of Fee Simple, 6.53 acres of Ecosystem and 1.20 acres of Permanent Access are required. 2

Map ID Owner Acres Notes 1729104001 1729300003 1729301002 1729301004 1729301006 City of Chicago (Bottomlands) 27.23 Fee City of Chicago (Bottomlands) 3.53 Fee City of Chicago (Bottomlands) 0.84 Fee City of Chicago (Bottomlands) 0.24 Fee City of Chicago (Bottomlands) 0.24 Fee City of Chicago (Bottomlands) 0.10 Fee 1729303001 Riversend Real Estate 0.38 1729309035 Riversend Real Estate 0.14 1729309036 SY Xie & M Xu 0.30 1729500003 No information 0.03 1729309002 No information 0.03 1729318001 1732100012 1732100003 First Washington Management 1.19 Fee First Washington Management 0.76 First Washington Management 0.13 1732100007 Mark IV Realty Iron 0.14 1732100008 Mark IV Realty Iron 0.08 1732115001 Mark IV Realty Iron 0.003 1732115005 Mark IV Realty Iron 0.003 1732112025 Acme Refining Company 0.30 1732500011 Mark IV Realty Iron 0.01 1732115006 Mark IV Realty Iron 0.11 1732115006 Mark IV Realty Iron 0.22 1732115003 Mark IV Realty Iron 0.006 1732115004 Crystal IL 98 LLC 0.24 1729319001 Peoples Gas 0.013 Permanent Access Permanent Access Permanent Access 3

1729319001 Peoples Gas 0.11 1732102001 James L Mazzochi 0.09 1732102005 Prairie Material Sales 0.09 1732102006 Taxpayer of 0.014 1732102003 VCNA Prairie IL Bldg 0.37 1732108001 VCNA Prairie IL Bldg 0.03 1732119043 City of Chicago 0.89 1732119010 Yev and Natalie Gray 0.01 1732119009 Robert J. Strimetz 0.02 1732119008 JS Two L.L.C. 0.02 1732116007 Prairie Mgmt & Dev 0.18 1732116008 Prairie Mgmt & Dev 0.16 1732300095 Greenhouse LLC 0.12 1732300095 Greebhouse LLC 0.10 1732300096 James Damion 0.01 1732300097 Princess Properties 0.11 1732300149 Princess Properties 0.14 1732300150 George E Quill 0.009 1732300106 Wesley A Bromberek 0.17 1732300106 Wesley A Bromberek 0.11 1732300114 No Information 0.04 17323000115 MWRD 0.030 17323000115 MWRD 0.23 1732300175 Loc 17 Heat/Frost INSU 0.013 1732300174 Acme Refining Company 0.24 1732300168 E O Korey & N N Korey 0.51 Permanent Access Permanent Access Permanent Access Permanent Access 4

1732300126 Midland Metal Products 0.03 1732300125 Midland Metal Products 0.11 1732300124 Midland Metal Products 0.06 1732300137 Midland Metal Products 0.03 1732300136 Midland Metal Products 0.04 1732300136 Midland Metal Products 0.09 1732300135 Thunderbird Catering 0.18 1732300107 Thunderbird Catering 0.33 1732300107 Thunderbird Catering 0.09 Permanent Access Permanent Access The City of Chicago is the Non-Federal Sponsor for this project. The LERRD required for the construction, operation and maintenance of the project is as follows: FEE EXCLUDING MINERALS (With Restriction on Use of the Surface) 33.37 Acres The fee simple title to the land, subject, however, to existing easements for public roads and highways, public utilities, railroads and pipelines; excepting and excluding all (coal) (oil and gas), in and under said land and all appurtenant rights for the exploration, development, production and removal of said (coal) (oil and gas), but without the right to enter upon or over the surface of said land for the for the purpose of exploration, development, production and removal therefrom of said (coal) (oil and gas). ROAD EASEMENT: 1.20 Acres A perpetual and assignable easement and right-of-way in, on, over and across (the land described in Schedule A) (Tracts Nos., and ) for the location, construction, operation, maintenance, alteration replacement of (a) road(s) and appurtenances thereto; together with the right to trim, cut, fell and remove therefrom all trees, underbrush, obstructions and other vegetation, structures, or obstacles within the limits of the right-of-way; (reserving, however, to the owners, their heirs and assigns, the right to cross over or under the right-of-way as access to their adjoining land at the locations indicated in Schedule B); 5/ subject, however, to existing easements for public roads and highways, public utilities, railroads and pipelines. Construction will be accomplished mainly from the creek via public boat launch. There are several areas where the creek is too shallow to access from the water; for these areas, permanent access easements will be obtained. No borrow sites are required for this project. Mitigation will not be necessary. 5

3. NON-FEDERAL SPONSOR LANDS At this time the project assumes the Non-Federal Sponsor owns in fee all bottom land areas that will be utilized for this project. Discussions with the City of Chicago are ongoing regarding the title to the bottom land. A final determination of ownership of the bottomland will be made after an investigation of title searches underway by the City of Chicago. Total acreage of Non-Federal Sponsor property needed for this project is 33.37 acres. 4. NON-STANDARD ESTATES A non-standard is recommended for the riparian restoration areas on the steep slope of Bubbly Creek due to the difficulty of acquiring fee simple ownership on portions of streambank currently in private ownership and the project requiring only narrow rights to for plant restoration. ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION EASEMENT 6.53 Acres A perpetual, assignable, right, power, privilege and easement, beginning with the date of this instrument, to enter upon, construct, monitor, operate, maintain and carry out aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem restoration and protection works and appurtenances thereto for the improvement of the environment in, on, over and across the lands described in Exhibit A, in connection with the _(Project Name) Ecosystem Restoration Project, as authorized by the Act of Congress under, together with the rights to control erosion and sedimentation; conduct dredging; stabilize shoreline; develop green space and wetlands; control or remove invasive species; plant native species; prohibit human habitation; clear, cut, fell, remove and dispose of any and all timber, trees, underbrush, buildings, improvements and/or other obstructions there from; perform controlled burning and/or mowing of vegetation on the lands; subject to existing easements for public roads and highways, public utilities, railroads and pipelines; reserving, however, to the landowners, their successors and assigns, all such rights and privileges as may be used without interfering with or abridging the rights and easement hereby acquired; provided that construction or other activities that may cause damage to the project lands or project features shall not be conducted without prior approval of the _(NFS) ; provided further that any use of the land shall be subject to Federal and State laws with respect to pollution. 5. EXISTING FEDERAL PROJECTS While the project is within the Federal navigation channel and in part, the Bubbly Creek Turning Basin, any Federal dredging or improvement projects that occurred in the project footprint were accomplished under Navigational Servitude which is not applicable to this Project. The NFS cannot use our rights of Navigational Servitude to operate and maintain this project and has not received any previous LERRD credit for Project real estate. 6. FEDERAL LAND There are no existing Federal Lands in the project area. 7. NAVIGATION SERVITUDE While the South Branch of the Chicago River is a navigable waterway within the United States, it is owned by the City of Chicago and navigational servitude will not be invoked. 6

8. PROJECT MAP See Exhibit A 9. INDUCED FLOODING Based on current modeling, there is no increase in ground water levels and the only increase in surface water levels occurs within the existing flood control project. Because the property being impacted is the creek where the project is being proposed, induced flooding does not occur. Therefore, no additional LER acquisition is anticipated. 10. BASELINE COST ESTIMATE: An estimate has been made of the market value of the lands required for the Project. Areas outside of the ownership of the City of Chicago will require administrative expenses including survey, title work, appraisals, negotiations, and legal fees. The estimated cost for this project is as follows: Non-Federal Lands and Damages $65,000 Administrative Costs $70,000 Incremental Costs (15%) $19,000 Total Non-Federal $154,000(Rounded) Federal Administrative Costs $25,000 Total Federal $25,000 TOTAL REAL ESTATE COSTS $179,000 The value of the lands, relocations, and disposal areas required for the Project was determined by a gross appraisal performed by the Detroit District (Petrucci), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, on or about 15 September 2013. The gross appraisal was reviewed and approved by the Louisville District appraiser (Williams) on or about 18 November 2013. 11. RELOCATION ASSISTANCE The project will not require Relocation Assistance Benefits (Public Law 91-646). 12. MINERALS No extractable minerals or standing timber or vegetation are on the Project lands. 13. CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT The City of Chicago is fully capable of performing the duties required. See Exhibit C 7

14. ZONING The enactment of zoning ordinances will not be required for this project. 15. ACQUISITION SCHEDULE WITH MILESTONES: The major project milestones are as follows: Request HQ Non-Standard Estate Approval November 2014 Approval of Non-Standard Estate by HQ December 2014 Commence RE Acquisition September 2015 Real Estate Available September 2017 Award Const. Contract September 2017 Begin Construction +4 months Complete Construction 2025 No detailed project schedule or milestones are available at this time. The Non-Federal Sponsor understands they must acquire all real estate required for the project and provide all necessary Right of Entry for construction prior to the beginning of construction. 16. FACILITY OR UTILITY RELOCATIONS Plans and Specifications do not identify any utilities/facilities that will need to be relocated. 17. ENVIRONMENTAL A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Baseline Study/Phase I HTRW investigation was conducted through a review of existing project information and database review. The most significant source of HTRW is the substrate sediment of the streambed due to years of unregulated industrial activity. Sediments are not considered hazardous waste based on reactivity but sulfide levels will need to be considered along with other sediment data when making decisions concerning material handling and disposal. If any HTRW is encountered during project executions, the sponsor shall be responsible for development and implementation of any required response action at 100% non-federal expense. See Exhibit B 18. PROJECT SUPPORT The City of Chicago is a willing sponsor and fully supports the Project. There is no public opposition anticipated. 19. RISK NOTIFICATION A risk notification letter has not been sent out. 20. OTHER RELEVANT REAL ESTATE ISSUES There are no cemeteries within the project area. There are no special aquatic sites, including wetlands, impacted by the project. 8

The Detroit District Real Estate Division will coordinate, monitor and assist with all real estate activities undertaken by the Non-Federal Sponsor. If any acquisition activities are required by the Non-Federal Sponsor, the Real Estate Division will assure that the acquisition process is conducted in compliance with Federal and State Laws, specifically, the requirements under the Federal Uniform Relocation and Acquisition Act (P.L. 91-646). The Real Estate Division will also attend district team meetings, review and provide input into draft and final reports prepared by the district team, and participate in the ATR. 9

EXHIBIT A: Bubbly Creek Project Map U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District Appendix G Real Estate Bubbly Creek, Chicago, Illinois

Bubbly Creek Real Estate Map U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District 1729104001 NS - 3.53 Acres 1729301002 0.24 Acres 1729300003 0.84 Acres 1729301004.24 Acres 1729301006.1 Acres 1729303001.37 Acres 1729309035.12 Acres 1729309036.29 Acres 1729500003 0.03 Acres 1729309002.03 Acres Legend Location Map Date: 9/9/2014 Parcels Ecosystem = 6.56 Acres L a k e M i c h i g a n FEE Simple = 33.37 Acres Road = 1.20 Acres *Ordinary High Water Mark is 577.1 Feet 1 in = 150 feet Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Illinois East FIPS 1201 Feet Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Path: G:\Projects_LRC\Bubbly_Creek\MXD\Bubbly Creek Real Estate Map_SEP14.mxd

1729309002.03 Acres Bubbly Creek Real Estate Map U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District 1729318001 1.19 Acres 1729319001 EE -.013 Acres RD -.11 ACRES 1732102001.09 Acres 1732102005.09 Acres 1732102006.012 Acres 1732100012.76 Acres 1732102003.37 Acres 1732100003.13Acres 1732108001.03 Acres 1732100007.14 Acres 1732100008.08 Acres 1732115001.003 Acres 1732115005.003 Acres 1732119043.87 Acres 1732115006 RD -.30 Acres 1732115006 RD -.01 Acres 1732115006 EE -.22 Acres RD -.11 Acres 1732119010.01 Acres 1732119009.02 Acres 1732119008.02 Acres 1732115003.007 Acres 1732116007.18 Acres 1732115004.24 Acres 1732116008.16 Acres Legend Location Map Date: 9/9/2014 Parcels Ecosystem = 6.56 Acres L a k e M i c h i g a n FEE Simple = 33.37 Acres Road = 1.20 Acres *Ordinary High Water Mark is 577.1 Feet 1 in = 250 feet Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Illinois East FIPS 1201 Feet Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Path: G:\Projects_LRC\Bubbly_Creek\MXD\Bubbly Creek Real Estate Map_SEP14.mxd

Bubbly Creek Real Estate Map.18 Acres U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District 1732115004.24 Acres 1732116008.16 Acres 1732300095 EE -.12 Acres RD -.10 Acres 1732300107 EE -.33 Acres RD -.09 Acres 1732300150.009 Acres 1732300096.01 Acres 1732300097.11 Acres 1732300149.14 Acres 1732300106 EE -.17 Acres RD -.11 Acres 1732300135.18 Acres 1732300124.06 Acres 1732300125.11 Acres 1732300126.03 Acres 1732300168.51 Acres 1732300136 EE -.04 Acres RD -.09 Acres 1732300137.03 Acres 1732300114.04 Acres 1732300115 EE -.024 Acres RD -.23 Acres 1732300174.24 Acres 1732300175.013 Acres Legend Location Map Date: 9/9/2014 Parcels Ecosystem = 6.56 Acres L a k e M i c h i g a n FEE Simple = 33.37 Acres Road = 1.20 Acres *Ordinary High Water Mark is 577.1 Feet 1 in = 250 feet Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Illinois East FIPS 1201 Feet Projection: Transverse Mercator Datum: North American 1983 Path: G:\Projects_LRC\Bubbly_Creek\MXD\Bubbly Creek Real Estate Map_SEP14.mxd

EXHIBIT B: Bubbly Creek Environmental Investigation Findings Map U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District Appendix G Real Estate Bubbly Creek, Chicago, Illinois

EXHIBIT C: Detroit Real Estate Assessment of Non-Federal Sponsor s Real Estate Acquisition Capability U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Chicago District Appendix G Real Estate Bubbly Creek, Chicago, Illinois

EXHIBIT C DETROIT REAL ESTATE ASSESSMENT OF NON-FEDERAL SPONSOR S REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION CAPABILITY Project, City of Chicago A. LEGAL AUTHORITY: 07 August 2013 1. It has been determined that the sponsor has legal authority to acquire and hold title to real property for project purposes? (Yes/No) 2. It has been determined that the sponsor has the power of eminent domain for this project. (Yes/No) 3. It has been determined that the sponsor has quick-take authority for this project? (Yes/No) 4. Are any lands/interests in land required for the project located outside the sponsor s political boundary, and whether this limits its ability to acquire property? (Yes/No). 5. A determination has been made as to whether any of the lands/interests in land required for the project are owned by an entity whose property the sponsor cannot condemn? (Yes/No) B. FINANCIAL CAPABILITY: 1. It has been established by the responsible district element that the local sponsor is financially capable of fulfilling all requirements of local cooperation. (Yes/No) C. WILLINGNESS TO PARITICIPATE: 1. Sponsor has stated in writing their general willingness to participate in the project and their understanding of the general scope of the project and their part of the project. (Yes/No) 2. In addition, they are agreeable to signing a Project Partnership Agreement (PPA) and supplying funding as stipulated in the agreement. (Yes/No) 14

3. The sponsor has approved the project/real estate schedule/milestone. (Yes/No) 4. The sponsor has participated in other USACE projects satisfactorily. (Yes/No/Not Applicable) 5. With regard to this project, the sponsor is anticipated to be highly capable/fully capable/ moderately capable/marginally capable/insufficiently capable. (If sponsor is believed to be insufficiently capable, provide explanation.) D. ACQUISITION EXPERIENCE AND CAPABILITY 1. Sponsor has on board capability/in house staffing within their organization or contract capability to provide the necessary services such as surveying, appraising, title, negotiating, condemnation, closings, and relocation assistance that will be required for the acquisition of properties. (Yes/No) 2. It has been determined that the sponsor s staff will not required training to become familiar with the real estate requirements of Federal projects including P.L. 91-646, as amended? (Yes/No) 3. It has been determined that the sponsor can obtain contractor support, if required, in a timely fashion. (Yes/No) 4. The sponsor s staff will be located within reasonable proximity to the project site. (Yes/No) 5. A determination has been made as to whether USACE assistance will likely be requested by the local sponsor in acquiring real estate. (Yes/No) E. SCHEDULE CAPABILITY: 1. Sponsor has indicated in writing their willingness and ability to incorporate their financial acquisition and condemnation capability to provide the necessary project LERRDs in accordance with proposed project schedules so the Government can advertise and award the construction contract as required by overall project schedule and funding limitations. (Yes/No F. LERRD CREDITS: 15

1. Sponsor has indicated their understanding of LERRD credits and their capability and willingness to gather the necessary information to submit as LERRD credits within six months after possession of all real estate and completion of relocations in order that the project can be financially closed out and there can be a final financial accounting with a proper settlement with the sponsor. (Yes/No) G. COORDINATION: 1. This assessment has been coordinated with the local sponsor and they concur with the assessment? (Yes/No) Prepared by: Paula M. Kohl Realty Specialist Reviewed and approved by: Victor L. Kotwicki Real Estate Contracting Officer Buffalo, Chicago, and Detroit District 16