SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas. Community and Corporate Services Committee

Similar documents
LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard

DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES. Decision Issue Date Thursday, March 22, 2018

Corporate Report. 2. That the Interim Control By-law prohibit within the Low Density Residential Suburban Neighbourhood (R1) zone, the following:

1202 & 1204 Avenue Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

(1) The following uses are permitted uses subject to:

Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan

Residential Intensification in Established Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS)

TO: CHAIR AND MEMBERS - PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE

Islington Avenue Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications Final Report

Planning and Building Department

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Official Plan Review. Discussion Paper: Second Residential Units. Prepared for: The Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake

Director, Community Planning, South District

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building

111 Wenderly Drive Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER :00 P.M.

Deeming By-law, Maple Leaf Drive, Bourdon Avenue, Venice Drive, Stella Street and Seabrook Avenue Final Report

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Public Notice. June 7, Application: New Zoning Schedule: RD3 (Residential Infill)

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

Amendment No. 41. City of Mississauga Planning Area

BY-LAW NO

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

April 3 rd, Monitoring the Infill Zoning Regulations. Review of Infill 1 and 2 and Proposed Changes

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

Municipal Council has directed staff to report annually on the nature of Variances granted by the Committee of Adjustment.

RT-6 District Schedule

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

111 Plunkett Road (formerly part of 135 Plunkett Road) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Plan of Subdivision Application - Preliminary Report

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Section Low Density Residential (R1) Land Use District

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. AVALON WEST STAGE 4 PLANNING RATIONALE. July Prepared for:

(b) each living unit shall have a minimum floor area of 27 m 2 (290.6 sq.ft.). (B/L No ) (a) the zoning designations R4, R5, R9, or

An Introduction to the City of Winnipeg s New Zoning By-Law

SECTION 10.0 GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES

Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

WHEREAS, the direction from the Study is to amend the Land Use Code in the following particulars:

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

TO: Mayor & Council DATE: July 19, FROM: General Manager, Planning & Development FILE:

507, 509 and 511 Kingston Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

LOCATION: LUC AND UNDERLYING ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION:

A By-law to amend Zoning and Development By-law No regarding Laneway Houses

QUEEN STREET 219 VICTORIA STREET & THE REAR LANDS OF JOHNSON STREET AND 129 JOHNSON STREET PROPOSED HOTEL

Policy and Standards for Public Local Residential Streets And Private Streets

Planning Justification Report - Update Castlegrove Subdivision, Gananoque Draft Plan of Subdivision and Class III Development Permit

RT-3 District Schedule

ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE

R0 Zones (Infill Housing) R08

Planning Commission Report

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

Planning and Development Committee. Planning and Building Department. Recommendation: Purpose: Page 1 of Report PB-39-17

50+54 BELL STREET NORTH

Part 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

and King Street West Part Lot Control Exemption Application Final Report

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

PART 11 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

Staff Report. October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17. Meeting Date: October 19, 2016

4027 and 4031 Ellesmere Road Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

377 Spadina Rd and 17 Montclair Ave - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

DISTRICT OF NORTH SAANICH BYLAW NO. 1306

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

SECTION 7. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 11, 2012

39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

4650 Eglinton Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Islington Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

Edward R. Sajecki Commissioner of Planning and Building

CD-1 (264) 101 Terminal Avenue By-law No (Being a By-law to Amend By-law 3575, being the Zoning and Development By-law)

CITY OF HAMILTON BY-LAW NO. To Amend Zoning By-law Respecting Downtown Zones

Development Permit Application

Committee of Adjustment Hearing Date: October 4, 2016

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

DECISION AND ORDER. PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 45(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")

BYLAW NUMBER 159D2016

PLANNING REPORT THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF COBOURG

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda

Residential Single Detached Dwelling Districts (RS)

SHOREACRES CHARACTER STUDY

Town of Whitby By-law #

4. CONFIRMATION OF NOTICE The Planning Coordinator will confirm how Notice was served to advertise this Public Meeting.

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER WHEREAS the matters herein set out are in conformity with the Official Plan of the Vaughan Planning

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

PLANNING PRIMER. Elective: Understanding Residential Intensification and Infill. Planning and Growth Management Department.

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

Transcription:

Page 1 of Report PB-70-16 SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas TO: FROM: Community and Corporate Services Committee Planning and Building Department Report Number: PB-70-16 Wards Affected: All File Numbers: 502-02-1, 505-08-04 Date to Committee: September 12, 2016 Date to Council: October 3, 2016 Recommendation: Endorse the amendments to the official plan, as contained in Appendix A, which relate to the implementation of the Roseland, Indian Point, and Shoreacres Character Studies. Endorse the amendments to the zoning bylaw, as contained in Appendix B, which relate to the implementation of the Roseland, Indian Point, and Shoreacres Character Studies, along with the elimination of the site plan process for low density residential areas. Endorse the amendments to the site plan bylaw, as contained in Appendix D, which relate to eliminating the requirement for site plan approval in low density residential areas. Direct the Director of Planning and Building to provide public notice in accordance with the Planning Act prior to bringing the amendments forward for enactment at a statutory public meeting. Direct the Executive Director of Capital Works to amend the Site Alteration Bylaw to include the review of grading and drainage matters in low density residential areas and bring forward for enactment at the above noted statutory public meeting. Purpose: The purpose of this report is to: 1. Consolidate the proposed zoning, official plan, and site plan by-law amendments considered by reports PB-03-16 (Site Plan Process), PB-14-16 (Roseland and

Page 2 of Report PB-70-16 Indian Point Character Study), and PB-15-16 (Shoreacres Character Study) into one report; 2. Highlight refinements to the proposed amendments since the above reports were presented to council on February 17, 2016; 3. Outline the elimination of the site plan process for low density residential areas; and 4. Identify next steps for public notice and statutory public meeting. The proposed recommendations align with the following objective in Burlington s Strategic Plan 2015-2040: A City that Grows Intensification 1.2.e: Older neighbourhoods are important to the character and heritage of Burlington and intensification will be carefully managed to respect these neighbourhoods. Background and Discussion: Reports PB-03-16 (Site Plan Process), PB-14-16 (Roseland and Indian Point Character Study), and PB-15-16 (Shoreacres Character Study) were presented to the Development and Infrastructure Committee on February 17, 2016. The purpose of the above noted reports was to summarize the findings from the character studies and discuss the elimination of the site plan process for low density residential areas. The development industry has reacted positively to the notion of eliminating the site plan process for low density residential areas in exchange for additional zoning regulations. Residents of Roseland and Shoreacres communities have generally reacted positively to the findings of the character studies, while some from the Indian Point community have expressed concerns with any proposed changes to the regulatory framework applicable to their community. Consolidation of official plan and zoning bylaw amendments There are overlapping themes and concepts among the three character studies and the elimination of the site plan process for low density residential areas. As such, the corresponding staff reports (PB-03-16, PB-14-16, and PB-15-16) were presented to the

Page 3 of Report PB-70-16 Development and Infrastructure Committee at the same time (February 2016) to ensure a consistent and informed discussion on each topic. The reports all recommended various interconnected amendments to the official plan and zoning bylaw. As council endorsed the findings from all three character studies and the site plan report, the next step for staff was to merge them into one omnibus document to facilitate public notification and council enactment. Appendix A and B of this report are a consolidation of the proposed official plan and zoning by-law amendments resulting from the character studies and elimination of site plan process for low density residential areas. Refinements of Proposed Amendments In addition to consolidating the recommendations from the February 17, 2016 reports, staff have been refining the findings from the character studies to ensure successful implementation. Proposed Official Plan Amendments Key refinements to the proposed official plan policies from the February 17, 2016 reports include: Elimination of the proposed definitions for Compatible, Massing, and Neighbourhood; Streamlining of the proposed definitions to Neighbourhood Character Area, Neighbourhood Character, and Scale; Streamlining of the proposed site specific character area policies; Streamlining of the proposed General Policies for Neighbourhood Character Areas; Reorganization of certain proposed General Policies for Neighbourhood Character Areas into Implementation policies for evaluating minor variance applications. These refinements will help to limit potential conflicts with other non-charcater area related policies of the current Official Plan and, with respect to the definitions of compatible, massing and neighbourhood, allow for these to be reviewed comprehensively as part of the broader Official Plan Review. However, despite the above noted editorial amendments, the general intent of the proposed Official Plan policies found in Appendix A of this report remain the same as originally identified in the February 17, 2016 reports. Proposed Zoning By-law Amendments Key refinements to the proposed zoning bylaw amendments from the February 17, 2016 reports include:

Page 4 of Report PB-70-16 Revision of the proposed side yard setbacks for Roseland and Indian Point to correlate with lot width as opposed to building height; Creation of a lot coverage requirement for 1 ½ storey dwellings in designated areas; Revision of the proposed floor area ratio so that it is uniform for all low density residential areas excluding Lakeshore/Northshore Corridor (but including Indian Point Character Area); Revision of the dwelling depth requirement so that it is applied to all low density residential areas excluding Lakeshore/Northshore Corridor (but including Indian Point Character Area); The above noted revisions and creation of zoning regulations is a result of staff consultation with the building industry and further consideration of the Lakeshore Road / Northshore Boulevard corridor. The general intent of the proposed zoning bylaw amendments found in Appendix B of this report remain the same as originally identified in the February 17, 2016 reports. Elimination of Site Plan Approval in Low Density Residential Areas The site plan process for single and semi-detached dwellings in low density residential areas will be eliminated (see Appendix D) in exchange for more restrictive zoning by translating the urban design guidelines from the site plan process for low density residential areas into zoning regulations where possible. Urban design and private boundary vegetation in low density residential areas will no longer be reviewed by staff. Boundary vegetion is regulated by the Foresty Act and any future issues with boundary vegetation will be a civil matter between neighbours. Low density residential areas will only be subject to zoning, grading and drainage review. The zoning review of single and semi-detached dwellings in low density residential areas will occur through the existing zoning clearance certificate process. To facilitate the grading and drainage review of low density residential development, the Capital Works department is developing an amendment to the city s site alteration bylaw that will provide site engineering staff with the authorization to review and enforce grading and drainage approvals for low density residential areas. The zoning and site alteration permit processes will be harmonized to implement an efficient and predictable customer service delivery for low density residential areas. This will also ensure a proactive approach to City Building by aligning with Council s Strategic Plan Priorities and the Official Plan work program. Next Steps Should Council endorse the proposed official plan and bylaw amendments recommended in this report, staff will have the public notice and formal amendments to

Page 5 of Report PB-70-16 the official plan, zoning by-law, site plan by-law, and site alteration by-law prepared so that the statutory public meeting will occur at the next council cycle for enactment. As part of the transition strategy, staff are notifying applicants for low density residential development of the proposed amendments so that they can prepare for the changes and decide if they would like to wait for them to be enacted or apply under the current regulatory framework. A notice of the recommended amendments has been sent to all mailing lists from the character studies, placed at the Planning front counter, and posted on the city website to help communicate the proposed changes. The proposed amendments are an interconnected suite of tools to support established low density residential areas. Once the proposed amendments clear the appeal period following council approval, in accordance with the Planning Act, they will all come into effect and be implemented immediately. Development applications submitted prior to council enactment of the proposed amendments will be reviewed under the regulatory framework in effect at that time. Financial Matters: All character studies have been completed within their allocated budgets. Total Financial Impact Elimination of the site plan process for low density residential areas will reduce site plan revenues as detailed in PB-03-16 presented in February this year. The elimination of the site plan process for low density residential areas would be replaced by applications for zoning and site engineering certificates. The fee for a site engineering certificate, when combined with the zoning certificate application fee, will cover the costs for staff effort and offset most of the decreased site plan revenue for the city. Source of Funding Not Applicable Other Resource Impacts Eliminating site plan approval for low density residential areas will allow site plan staff to focus on other key city building priorities. Public Engagement Matters: The contents of this report have been discussed with the Burlington Housing and Development Liaison Committee (HDLC) to provide a status update since the February

Page 6 of Report PB-70-16 17, 2016 reports and outline next steps. The character study webpages have been updated with the proposed amendments and all mailing lists from the character studies have been notified of such. Public notice for this report has been provided in the newspaper which included an invitation for a drop in session to discuss the proposed amendments prior to presentation to committee. Conclusion: This report consolidates the refined findings from the character studies and the strategy to eliminate the site plan process for low density residential areas. Together, they recommend a refocusing of our regulatory framework to be more proactive in supporting established low density residential areas and enhance customer service delivery. Respectfully submitted, Jamie Tellier, Manager of Urban Design, x7892 Rosa Bustamante, Special Business Area Co-ordinator, x7259 Andrea Smith, Manager of Policy and Research, 7385 Appendices: a. Official Plan Amendments b. Zoning Bylaw Amendments c. Supporting Graphics for the Proposed Zoning Bylaw Amendments d. Site Plan Bylaw Amendment Report Approval: All reports are reviewed and/or approved by Department Director, Director of Finance and Director of Legal. Final approval is by the City Manager.

Page 7 of Report PB-70-16 Appendix A: Proposed Official Plan Amendments 1. Part VIII, Definitions, Neighbourhood Character, is added with the following: Neighbourhood Character - The collective physical qualities and characteristics which are prevalent in a Neighbourhood Character Area and which define its distinct identity, and includes a range of built form and design elements which coexist without adverse impact within the Neighbourhood Character Area. 2. Part VIII, Definitions, Neighbourhood Character Area, is added with the following: Neighbourhood Character Area - A residential neighbourhood identified in the Zoning By-law, which shares physical qualities and characteristics that collectively provide a distinct and recognizable character that is different from neighbouring areas. 3. Part VIII, Definitions, Scale, is added with the following: Scale - The proportion of a building or building element created by the placement and size of the building or element in comparison with adjacent buildings or building elements and to human dimension. 4. Part III, Land Use Policies Urban Planning Area, Section 2.2.3 Site Specific Policies, is amended by adding the following subsections n) and o): 2.2.3 Site Specific Policies n) Indian Point is a distinct historic Neighbourhood Character Area characterized by its lakeside location; few streets; large and mature tree canopy; spacious properties separated by large open spaces between houses and a variety of architectural styles. New development should protect and enhance these neighbourhood character elements. o) Roseland is a distinct Neighbourhood Character Area defined by its garden-like setting with large and mature trees, and homes with varied and unique architectural styles. Lots are spacious with dwellings that are well proportioned in relation to the property size and having a scale that is compatible with adjacent dwellings and which reinforces the open space character. Streets within the Neighbourhood Character Area contain wide landscaped boulevards and street lamps that complement the neighbourhood character of the private properties. New development should protect and enhance these neighbourhood character elements.

Page 8 of Report PB-70-16 5. Land Use Policies Urban Planning Area, Section 2.2.4 Neighbourhood Character Areas, is added with the following: 2.2.4 Neighbourhood Character Areas a) Neighbourhood Character Areas play an important role in the City s Urban Structure by defining specific neighbourhoods where only limited, compatible development is anticipated. All development and re-development within a defined neighbourhood character area shall be consistent with the neighbourhood character. 2.2.4.1 Objectives a) To maintain, protect and enhance neighbourhood character by ensuring that development and re-development within neighbourhood character areas is consistent with the neighbourhood character; b) To manage change in neighbourhood character areas through appropriate development applications; and, c) To maintain and improve the urban forest in neighbourhood character areas through the enhancement and/or replacement of trees. 2.2.4.2 General Policies a) Neighbourhood Character Areas shall be identified in the City s Zoning By-law; b) City Council may add or delete neighbourhood character areas or alter the boundaries of existing neighbourhood character areas from time to time through further amendment to the Zoning By-law without need for an official plan amendment; c) Notwithstanding the policies of Part III, Subsections 2.2.2, b) and c) of this Plan, permitted uses within neighbourhood character areas shall be restricted to singledetached dwellings; d) Proposed development should respect the existing neighbourhood character by incorporating built form, architectural features, building separations, lot coverage and landscape elements that are prevalent in the neighbourhood character area; and e) All healthy mature trees should be preserved and replanting should be required where loss of significant trees occurs. 6. Part VI, Implementation, Section 4.2 Minor Variance Policies, is hereby amended by adding the following subsection c): c) In commenting to the Committee of Adjustment on minor variance applications involving single detached dwellings or new lot creation in neighbourhood character areas, the City shall ensure that the following is considered: (i) (ii) The proposed development shall achieve consistency with neighbourhood character; On properties that are located at the end of a terminating street, dwellings should be designed and located to reinforce a framed focal point;

Page 9 of Report PB-70-16 (iii) Proposed developments located on corner lots should create a strong connection to both streetscapes through attractive facades and landscaping facing each street; (iv) The minimum lot widths and areas of proposed new lots in neighbourhood character areas shall meet or exceed the average lot width and lot area of residential lots containing single detached dwellings which front onto both sides of the same street within 120 m of the subject property.

Page 10 of Report PB-70-16 Appendix B: Proposed Zoning By-law Amendments 1. Part 1 General Conditions and Provisions, Section 2.3 Patios, Decks, Balconies, and Porches Residential, Section 2.3.2 is hereby amended by adding subsection (b): b) Decks located above the first storey in the side and rear yard of detached dwellings are not permitted. 2. Part 1 General Conditions and Provisions, Section 2.3 Patios, Decks, Balconies, and Porches Residential, Section 2.3.3 is hereby amended by adding subsection (a): a) Balconies located above the first storey in the side and rear yard of detached dwellings are not permitted. 3. Part 1 General Conditions and Provisions, Section 2.24 Driveway Widths and Landscape Open Space Area, Section 2.24 2) is amended by adding subclause (c): c) Properties located within the Shoreacres Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps, only one driveway is permitted for each residential property including corner lots. 4. Part 1 General Conditions and Provisions, Section 2.24 Driveway Widths and Landscape Open Space Area, Section 2.24 is amended by renumbering subsection 3) to 4): 5. Part 1 General Conditions and Provisions, Section 2.24 Driveway Widths and Landscape Open Space Area, Section 2.24 is amended by adding a new subsection 3): 3) Driveways shall be a minimum of 6m in length. a) For dwelling units within a plan of condominium, driveway lengths shall be 6.7m in length measured from back of curb to front of garage. 6. Part 1 General Conditions and Provisions, Section 2.24 Driveway Widths and Landscape Open Space Area, Section 2.24 4) is amended by adding subclause (h): h) Properties located within the Shoreacres Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps, regardless of lot width, shall be subject to subsection (e) above. Circular and hammerhead driveways are subject to subsections (f) and (g) above.

Page 11 of Report PB-70-16 7. Part 1 General Conditions and Provisions, Section 2.31 Residential Building Height, Footnotes to Table 2.31.1 is amended by replacing footnote (a) as follows: a) Properties with a front or street side yard abutting Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard and all properties south of Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard (excluding Indian Point Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps) shall be exempt from this building height regulation. For through lots, the front building elevation shall determine the front of the lot for the purposes of this regulation. 8. Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4 R1, R2, R3 Zone Regulations, Table 2.4.1 is amended by adding Footnote (d) to the R1.2 and R2.1 zones: Zone Lot Width Lot Area Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Street Side Yard R1.2 24 m 925 m 2 9 m 9 m (c) (a) (d) 9 m R2.1 18 m 700 m 2 11 m 10 m (c) (a) (d) 4.5 m 9. Part 2 Residential Zones, Footnotes to Table 2.4.1 is hereby amended by adding the following subsection (d): (d) Properties located within the Roseland and Indian Point Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps: With attached garage or carport: Lots under 17m in width: 10% of actual lot width Lots between 17-25m in width: 12% of actual lot width Lots greater than 25m in width: 15% of actual lot width up to a maximum of 5 m Without attached garage or carport: Lots under 17m in width: 10% of actual lot width, 3 m minimum on the side with a driveway Lots between 17-25m in width: 12% of actual lot width, 3 m minimum on the side with a driveway Lots greater than 25m in width: 15% of actual lot width, 3 m minimum on the side with a driveway 10. Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4 R1, R2, R3 Zone Regulations, Table 2.4.1 is amended by adding Footnote (e) and (f) to the R2.1 zone:

Page 12 of Report PB-70-16 Zone Lot Width Lot Area Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Street Side Yard R2.1 18 m 700 m 2 11 m (e) (f) 10 m (c) (a) (d) 4.5 m 11. Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4 R1, R2, R3 Zone Regulations, Footnotes to Table 2.4.1 is amended by adding Footnote (e) and (f): (e) Properties located on the west side of Indian Road as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps shall have a front yard of 4 m. (f) Properties located within the Shoreacres Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Mapswith an R2.1 zone shall have a front yard of 9m. 12. Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4 R1, R2, R3 Zone Regulations, Table 2.4.1 is amended by adding Footnote (g) and to the R2.4 zone: Zone Lot Width Lot Area Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Street Side Yard R2.4 16 m 600 m 2 6 m 9m (c) (b) (g) 4.5 m 13. Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4 R1, R2, R3 Zone Regulations, Footnotes to Table 2.4.1 is amended by adding Footnote (g): (g) Properties located within the Shoreacres Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps shall have a side yard subject to footnote (a) above. 14. Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.2, Lot Coverage, Table 2.4.3, All Dwellings in Designated Areas, is amended to include one and a half storey dwellings:

Page 13 of Report PB-70-16 All Dwellings in Designated Areas (b) (c) 35% for one storey dwellings including accessory buildings 30% for one and a half storey dwellings including accessory buildings 25% for all other dwelling types including accessory buildings 27% for one storey dwellings plus 8% for accessory buildings 22% for one and a half storey dwellings plus 8% for accessory buildings 17% for all other dwelling types plus 8% for accessory buildings 15. Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.2, Lot Coverage, Table 2.4.3, footnote (c) is amended by replacing footnote (c) as follows: Properties with a front or street side yard abutting Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard and all properties south of Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard (excluding Indian Point Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps) shall be exempt from this lot coverage regulation. For through lots, the front building elevation shall determine the front of the lot for the purposes of this regulation. 16. Part 2 Residential Zones, is hereby amended by adding the following subsection 4.5 Floor Area Ratio: 4.5 Floor Area Ratio a) The maximum floor area ratio is 0.45:1. b) Properties with a front or street side yard abutting Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard and all properties south of Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard (excluding Indian Point Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps) shall be exempt from this floor area ratio regulation. For through lots, the front building elevation shall determine the front of the lot for the purposes of this regulation. 17. Part 2 Residential Zones, is hereby amended by adding the following subsection 4.6 Dwelling Depth: 4.6 Dwelling Depth a) Maximum depth of a dwelling shall be 18m measured from building wall closest to front lot line to building wall closest to rear lot line. Note - Properties with a front or street side yard abutting Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard and all properties south of Lakeshore Road and North

Page 14 of Report PB-70-16 Shore Boulevard (excluding Indian Point Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.9 Character Area Maps) shall be exempt from this dwelling depth regulation. For through lots, the front building elevation shall determine the front of the lot for the purposes of this regulation. 18. Part 2 Residential Zones, is hereby amended by adding the following subsection 4.7 Architectural Features: 4.7 Architectural Features a) On building elevations facing a street, the height of columns and windows on the first storey shall not exceed the height of the ceiling of the first storey. 19. Part 2 Residential Zones, is hereby amended by adding the following subsection 4.8 Garages: 4.8 Garages a) The width of a front loading attached garage shall not exceed 50% of the width of its building elevation. b) An attached garage with a garage door facing the street is not permitted to project beyond the front wall on the first storey of a dwelling. 20. Part 2 Residential Zones, is hereby amended by adding the following subsection 4.9 Character Area Maps: 4.9 Character Area Maps a) Roseland Character Area b) Indian Point Character Area c) Shoreacres Character Area 21. Part 15 Zoning Maps, are amended to include the boundaries of the Roseland, Indian Point, and Shoreacres Character Areas. 22. Part 15 Zoning Maps, are amended to include the Indian Point Character Area and Shoreacres Character Area as a designated area for lot coverage. 23. Part 16 Definitions, Floor Area Ratio Low Density Residential is added with the following:

Page 15 of Report PB-70-16 Floor Area Ratio Low Density Residential The mathematical relationship between building floor area and lot area, determined by dividing the floor area of a building (including garage) by the net area of that lot.

Page 16 of Report PB-70-16 Appendix C: Supporting Graphics for the Proposed Zoning By-law Amendments The following proposed zoning regulations are graphically illustrated below: Balcony Regulations Front Yard Setbacks Lot Coverage Floor Area Ratio Architectural Features Garage Widths and Projections Proposed Balcony Regulations: Balconies located above the first storey in the side and rear yard of detached dwellings are not permitted. Deck Balcony Rear yard Deck Rear yard YES Deck located below the first storey in the rear yard NO Deck or balcony located above the first storey in the rear yard

Page 17 of Report PB-70-16 Proposed Front Yard Setback Regulations: Properties located on the west side of Indian Road as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.10 Character Area Maps shall have a front yard of 4 m. Properties located within the Shoreacres Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.10 Character Area Mapswith an R2.1 zone shall have a front yard of 9m. R2.1 Zone Front yard 9 m 11 m Front yard Front yard 4 m Front Yard in Shoreacres Character Area Front Yard in Indian Point and Roseland Character Areas Front Yard on west side of Indian Road

Page 18 of Report PB-70-16 Proposed Lot Coverage Regulations All Dwellings in Designated Areas (b) (c) 35% for one storey dwellings including accessory buildings 30% for one and a half storey dwellings including accessory buildings 25% for all other dwelling types including accessory buildings 27% for one storey dwellings plus 8% for accessory buildings 22% for one and a half storey dwellings plus 8% for accessory buildings 17% for all other dwelling types plus 8% for accessory buildings R2.1 Zone Deck Deck Deck 35% Coverage 30% Coverage 25% Coverage Driveway Driveway Driveway One-storey footprint One and a half-storey footprint footprint for all other dwelling types

Page 19 of Report PB-70-16 Proposed Floor Area Ratio Regulations: Floor Area Ratio The maximum floor area ratio is 0.45:1. Properties with a front or street side yard abutting Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard and all properties south of Lakeshore Road and North Shore Boulevard (excluding Indian Point Character Area as identified in Part 2 Residential Zones, Section 4.10 Character Area Maps) shall be exempt from this floor area ratio regulation. For through lots, the front building elevation shall determine the front of the lot for the purposes of this regulation. R2.1 Zone 2 storey to 10m 0.45:1 FAR 1 ½ storey to 8.5m 0.45:1 FAR 0.45:1 FAR 1 storey to 7.5m 0.45:1 FAR

Page 20 of Report PB-70-16 Proposed Architectural Feature Regulations: On building elevations facing a street, the height of columns and windows on the first storey shall not exceed the height of the ceiling of the first storey. NO Columns exceeding the height of the ceiling of the first storey NO Columns exceeding the height of the ceiling of the first storey

Page 21 of Report PB-70-16 Proposed Garage Width and Projection Regulations The width of a front loading attached garage shall not exceed 50% of the width of its building elevation. An attached garage with a garage door facing the street is not permitted to project beyond the front wall on the first storey of a dwelling. Garage Garage YES YES Garage Garage door does not project beyond the front wall on the first storey Garage Garage Porch NO Garage door projects beyond the front wall on the first storey (does not include porch) NO Garage door exceeds 50% of the width of the building elevation

Page 22 of Report PB-70-16 Appendix D: Site Plan Bylaw Amendment THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGTON BY-LAW NUMBER XX-2016 A By-law pursuant to Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, as amended; WHEREAS subsection (13) (b) of Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, empowers the council of a municipality which has designated a site plan control area to delegate to either a committee of the council or to an appointed officer of the municipality identified in the by-law either by name or position occupied, any of the council s powers or authority under Section 41, except the authority to define any class or classes of development; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the City of Burlington has designated the whole of the City of Burlington as an area of site plan control by by-law; THE COUNCIL OF THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGTON HEREBY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS: 1. The powers and authority of the Council of the Corporation of the City of Burlington pursuant to subsections (4), (5), and (7) of Section 41 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P. 13, and any amendments or successors thereto, are hereby delegated as follows: (a) the Council s powers and authority respecting development of detached dwellings and semi-detached dwellings including accessory structures as defined in the City of Burlington By-law 2020, as amended, are delegated to the Chief Building Official for the City of Burlington. ENACTED AND PASSED this..day of 2016. MAYOR CITY CLERK