Cost of Living Comparisons: Valdosta, Georgia, and the Nation Third Quarter 2009 October 23, 2009

Similar documents
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS RESEARCH DIVISION

VERMONT S RENTAL HOUSING AFFORDABILITY GAP CONTINUES TO GROW The Average Vermont Renter Can t Afford a Modest 2-Bedroom Apartment

Recovery? Growth? Jobs? Capital Investment?

Housing Affordability: Local and National Perspectives

Real Estate Investor Market Research Report. Real Estate IRA Investment Trends & Insights

MAMA Risk Summary Data through 2011 Q3

List of 2009 Round Allocations

California s Housing Market: How Much Froth Is Out There?

U.S. GDP (2012 Q Q2)

HOUSING DISCRIMINATION SURVEY

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - January

Real Estate Update. elearning series. Upcoming elearning series. Year-End Planning. September 16

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - May

VSIP POSITION LISTING American Federation of Government Employees

Joint Center for Housing Studies. Harvard University

Guide for Estimating Affordability and Cap Exclusions for 2018 Deliveries

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 5 CFR Part 531 RIN: 3206-AM88. General Schedule Locality Pay Areas

Quick Facts. For Week Ending July 14, 2018 Publish Date: July 23, 2018 All comparisons are to % - 2.7% - 14.

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - February

Rural Development Single Family Housing Guaranteed Loan Program Indiana Income Limits per Household Size

Weekly Market Activity Report

The U.S. Housing Confidence Index

RETAIL REPORT VIEWPOINT 2018 / COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE TRENDS. By: Hugh F. Kelly, PhD, CRE IRR.COM AN INTEGRA REALTY RESOURCES PUBLICATION

Welcome. Introductions Nature Expectations Agenda Timing. Home Sweet Home 2

Cottage Food Laws as of December 2014

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - March

Rx for Real Estate. elearning series. Upcoming elearning series

TEXAS LUXURY HOME SALES REPORT Edition

Housing Supply Restrictions Across the United States

Key Findings on the Affordability of Rental Housing from New York City s Housing and Vacancy Survey 2008

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 5 Issue 2 SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY. Key Findings, 2 nd Quarter, 2015

THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN SELLING YOUR HOUSE SPRING 2018 EDITION

SPECIAL REPORT. Single-Family Rent Index: H Review

CB Richard Ellis. Los Angeles Multi-Housing Experts

More details >>> HERE <<<

(904) (904)

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 3, Issue 1. THE SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY Introduction

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - March

Weekly Market Activity Report A RESEARCH TOOL FROM MINNEAPOLIS AREA REALTORS

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 3, Issue 3 SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY. Introduction

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT. 5 CFR Part 531 RIN 3206-AN64. General Schedule Locality Pay Areas

DATA FOR JANUARY Published Feburary 16, Sales are down -14.0% month-over-month. The year-over-year comparison is up +2.5%.

Economic Outlook in Uncertain Times

Winning with Foreclosures

Market Trends and Outlook

Year to Date (thru June)

Municipal Finance: Conditions, Local Responses, and Outlook for the Future

Do Family Wealth Shocks Affect Fertility Choices?

MANHATTAN RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT THIRD QUARTER

BuildZoom & Urban Economics Lab Index. Quarterly Report: 2015 Q1

PACE LAW SCHOOL LAND USE & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE

Weekly Market Activity Report

Goomzee Corporation Fall MLS Platforms. America s MLS Platform Vendors & Market Distribution. Goomzee Research

CBER-LIED Report on Housing Market Conditions

Your Key to New Homeownership

Colliers International STUDENT HOUSING. National Sales Report Year End

Rent Stabilization, Vacancy Decontrol and Reinvestment in Rental Property in Berkeley, California

STOCKTON, DETROIT, RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO POST TOP METRO FORECLOSURE RATES ACCORDING TO REALTYTRAC Q METROPOLITAN FORECLOSURE MARKET REPORT

The Link Between Middle-Income Housing Affordability and Affordable Housing

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 4, Issue 3. THE Introduction SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY

Charlottesville Housing Market Report Year-End (Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS )

Quick Facts. For Week Ending August 13, 2016 Publish Date: August 22, 2016 All comparisons are to % - 2.8% - 17.

National Foreclosure Report

OUR DETAIL IS RETAIL.

Housing Price Forecasts. Illinois and Chicago PMSA, January 2018

The Subject Section. Chapter 2. Property Address

THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN SELLING YOUR HOUSE. Licensed Brokers MA and FL SUMMER 2018 EDITION

San Diego s High-Price Housing Strains Economic Capacity S

QUARTERLY MARKET REPORT

CONTENTS. Executive Summary 1. Southern Nevada Economic Situation 2 Household Sector 5 Tourism & Hospitality Industry

QUARTERLY MARKET REPORT SECOND QUARTER 2010

Housing, Construction, and Remodeling Update. Toby Morrison Director of Insights Metrostudy October 12, 2013

Weekly Market Activity Report

Housing and Mortgage Market Update

U.S. Economic and Institutional Apartment Market Overview and Outlook. January 7, 2015

QUARTERLY MARKET REPORT FIRST QUARTER 2013

Las Vegas Housing-Market Conditions

Weekly Market Activity Report

REALTORS CONFIDENCE INDEX SURVEY Report on the December 2015 Survey

First Quarter 2019 Market Report Manhattan Residential

CAAR Market Report 2010 Mid-Year Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS

Cost of Doing Business Peoria, Arizona

MULTIFAMILY REPORT VIEWPOINT 2018 / COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE TRENDS. By: Hugh F. Kelly, PhD, CRE IRR.COM AN INTEGRA REALTY RESOURCES PUBLICATION

Has The Office Market Reached A Peak? Vacancy. Rental Rate. Net Absorption. Construction. *Projected $3.65 $3.50 $3.35 $3.20 $3.05 $2.90 $2.

Revised Texas Housing Affordability Index

By several measures, homebuilding made a comeback in 2012 (Figure 6). After falling another 8.6 percent in 2011, single-family

Quarterly Indicators. Q Activity Snapshot + 3.5% + 3.1% % Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales.

MANHATTAN RESIDENTIAL MARKET REPORT FIRST QUARTER

No Survey Required w/ Survey. Affidavit. Affidavit. Affidavit

(904) (904)

THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN SELLING YOUR HOUSE EDITION

THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN SELLING YOUR HOUSE FALL 2018 EDITION

TEXAS HOUSING INSIGHT

CAAR Market Report 2010 First Quarter Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS

THINGS TO CONSIDER WHEN SELLING YOUR HOUSE EDITION

CONTENTS. Executive Summary. Southern Nevada Economic Situation 1 Household Sector 4 Tourism & Hospitality Industry

In the early 1980s only a handful of community land trusts existed in the United States

Metro Atlanta Rental Housing Affordability: How Hot is Too Hot for Low-Income Workers?

Housing affordability in England and Wales: 2018

Transcription:

Overview In the third quarter of 2009, survey data suggest that the cost of living for middle management households in Georgia communities is about 8.3 percent less, on average, than in the rest of the U.S. So, for each dollar that is required to maintain the average standard of living in other areas of the country, Georgia residents are only required to spend about 91.7 cents. Valdosta, Georgia s cost of living is slightly higher than the Georgia state average, with Valdosta residents required to spend about 94.6 cents for each dollar required to maintain the living standards of the average U.S. household. This is not a major change from last quarter. Among metropolitan areas, the cost to live in Atlanta is the highest in Georgia, but is still below the national average. In 2008, we saw that Atlanta was the most expensive city in the state in which to live. This pattern continues into 2009, as the data suggest that Atlanta and Marietta continue to be the most expensive Georgia cities to participate in the cost of living survey. The principal reason for the relatively lower living cost in Georgia remains the relatively lower prices in the state s housing sector, which combines information on recent sales of new houses, local apartment rents, and local home mortgage rates. Recent news headlines by the National Association of Realtors (NAR) on proclaim that existing home sales increased 9.4 percent in September 2009 compared to August 2009. This indicates that home sales are at the highest level since July 2007, in part due to the homebuyers tax credit. Interestingly, first-time homebuyers accounted for about 45 percent of the home sales during the past year. It will be interesting to see how the data are impacted if the tax credit program is extended for a longer period of time or if it is expanded to include more categories of potential homebuyers. Results for the Nation Table 1 shows the ten most and least expensive urban areas in the third quarter of 2009. Not surprisingly, we see that the usual suspects are among the top ten most expensive urban areas, including New York, Honolulu, San Francisco, and down to 1

Stamford, CT. Also recall that the national average cost of living index equals 100. This suggests that the cost to live in New York (Manhattan), for example, is more than twice the national average. Also in Table 1 we see the top ten least expensive urban areas that participated in the cost of living index survey. Douglas, GA, which topped the list last quarter as the least expensive area in the nation, has moved down to the number two position behind Pueblo, CO. Table 1. The Ten Most and Least Expensive Urban Areas in the ACCRA Cost of Living Index (COLI) National Average for 315 Urban Areas = 100 Most Expensive Least Expensive COL COL Ranking Urban Areas Index Ranking Urban Areas Index 1 New York (Manhattan) NY 214.7 1 Pueblo CO 84.3 2 New York (Brooklyn) NY 177.2 2 Douglas GA 84.4 3 Honolulu HI 166.5 3 Pryor Creek OK 84.4 4 San Francisco CA 162.9 4 Cookeville TN 84.5 5 New York (Queens) NY 156.3 5 Harlingen TX 84.5 6 San Jose CA 153.1 6 Broken Arrow OK 84.7 7 Orange County CA 146.7 7 Fort Smith AR 85.2 8 Nassau County NY 144.9 8 Martinsville-Henry County VA 85.2 9 Truckee-Nevada County CA 144.4 9 Lawton OK 85.9 10 Stamford CT 143.1 10 Martinsburg-Berkeley County WV 85.9 Dairy Fluctuations Each quarter, C2ER collects more than 90,000 prices from communities across the US for the Cost of Living Index. This quarter C2ER noticed dramatic changes in dairy prices. Consequently, C2ER is featuring communities with the most and least expensive dairy items, specifically milk and eggs. Across the country, prices for both have taken a tumble. Reports suggest that the recent economic downturn has created problems in the dairy industry. Table 2 shows the most and least expensive places for a half-gallon of milk; you will notice that Valdosta, GA is the area with the fifth highest average milk price. 2

Most Expensive Milk Cost of Living Comparisons: Valdosta, Georgia, and the Nation Table 2. The Five Most and Least Expensive Places for a Half-Gallon of Milk by Average Average for 315 Urban Areas = $1.87 Least Expensive Milk Ranking Urban Areas Avg. Ranking Urban Areas Avg. 1 Honolulu HI 3.81 1 Prescott-Prescott Valley AZ 1.05 2 Wilmington NC 3.24 2 Lexington KY 1.21 3 Carlsbad NM 2.84 3 Flagstaff AZ 1.24 4 Orlando FL 2.81 4 Iowa City IA 1.28 5 Valdosta GA 2.59 5 Tucson AZ 1.31 Egg production has caught up with demand, which results in lower prices. Table 3 lists the five most expensive and five least expensive places to buy eggs among the 315 third quarter participants. Table 3. The Five Most and Least Expensive Places for Eggs by Average Average for 315 Urban Areas = $1.25 Most Expensive Least Expensive Ranking Urban Areas Avg. Avg. Ranking Urban Areas 1 Truckee-Nevada County CA 2.96 1 Sheboygan WI 0.73 2 San Francisco CA 2.63 2 Asheville NC 0.74 3 Oakland CA 2.51 3 McAllen TX 0.76 4 San Jose CA 2.50 4 Appleton WI 0.79 5 Kodiak AK 2.49 5 Elkhart-Goshen IN 0.82 Results for the Atlanta Metropolitan Statistical Area How does Atlanta compare to the U.S. average? Table 4 shows that the Atlanta Metropolitan area is about 4.6 percent less costly than the average urban area that participated in the third quarter 2009 survey. Comparing Georgia urban areas with the most expensive urban areas listed in Table 1, we see that the Georgia composite indexes are much lower than the most expensive urban areas. This suggests that Atlanta and the rest of Georgia remain well positioned to accommodate new migrants to the area if the correct mix of jobs is present there. Results for the Valdosta Metropolitan Statistical Area As Table 4 indicates, Valdosta s cost of living is approximately 5.4 percent below the national average. But, how does Valdosta s cost of living compare with other Georgia cities? Table 4 suggests that Valdosta has a cost of living that is slightly higher than the average of all Georgia cities included in the survey. Valdosta s cost of living, a 3

major business recruitment tool, remains relatively low principally because of relatively low prices in housing and utilities. For Valdosta, the housing index of 84.7 suggests that housing costs are 15.3 percent less than the average house price for all urban areas in this survey ($299,023). The housing index is low for Valdosta partly due to the slowdown in demand for newly constructed homes in Lowndes County. National and local building permit data suggest that increased demand for residential home construction may be right around the corner. Commercial real estate sales, however, are expected to stay soft until the first quarter 2010 according to most housing experts. Notice, too, that the NAR reports the U.S. median sales price of existing singlefamily homes in September 2009 to be $174,900, which is 8.1 percent lower than one year ago. What accounts for this decrease is distressed sales, which, according to the NAR, are pulling down the median price by about 20 percent. The difference in sales prices can be attributed to the difference in methodologies used by C2ER and the NAR. C2ER bases home prices on a standardized newly constructed home with 2,400 square feet (and other features) whereas the NAR uses the sales of all existing homes, no matter what the size or location. So, two different methodologies do result in two different estimates of home sales prices. Table 4. Indices for Georgia Metropolitan Statistical Areas Composite Index Grocery Housing Utilities Transportation Health Care Albany 90.7 109.3 73.4 81.0 94.7 90.5 Americus 88.6 103.1 76.0 90.4 99.2 107.1 Atlanta 95.4 99.8 90.8 84.3 94.9 105.6 Marietta 92.5 94.0 83.3 85.6 99.8 104.9 Augusta 92.9 110.8 80.7 88.5 101.3 102.3 Douglas 84.4 96.5 63.1 101.4 89.9 85.7 Savannah 94.6 93.5 87.8 90.2 95.3 97.5 Valdosta 94.6 108.1 84.7 86.0 98.7 98.2 Average 91.7 101.9 80.0 88.4 96.7 99.0 Useful City Comparisons The cost of living data tell us that the Composite Index for Baltimore, MD is 120.9; for Valdosta, GA it is 94.6. Using this information, we can answer these questions: 1. What is the Valdosta salary that is equivalent to a Baltimore salary of $50,000? 2. What is the Baltimore salary that is equivalent to a Valdosta salary of $50,000? Two jobs with identical salaries may not have identical purchasing power if one is located in a relatively high-cost city while the other is located in a relatively low-cost city. If you earn $50,000 per year in Baltimore, the salary in Valdosta required to maintain your Baltimore standard of living would be $39,123. However, if you earn $50,000 per year in Valdosta, you would need to earn $63,900 in Baltimore to maintain the same standard of living. Table 5 below shows how to calculate the equivalent salaries 4

in these two cities. Note that the formula in Table 5 can be used to compare any of the indices presented here (i.e. health care, transportation, utilities, housing, and groceries) between cities of interest. This kind of information is very useful to households considering a move to a different part of the country. Table 5. Cost Comparison for Valdosta, GA and Baltimore, MD Austin, TX to Valdosta, GA (94.6 * $50,000)/120.9 = $ 39,123.24 Valdosta, GA to Austin, TX (120.9 * $50,000)/ 94.6 = $ 63,900.63 Methodology and Data Limitations The findings presented come from an analysis of national survey data performed by the Center for Business and Economic Research (CBER) at Valdosta State University. CBER conducts applied research for the business community and provides a conduit between the community and the expertise of the Langdale College of Business Administration faculty. The survey itself is conducted by C2ER (formerly known as ACCRA), a nonprofit professional organization located in Arlington, VA. C2ER has been publishing quarterly measures of living cost differentials since 1968. For the third quarter of 2009, 315 communities in the United States collected price data. The average index for all participating communities is 100; each individual community s index should be read as a percentage of the average for all communities. This cost of living index measures relative prices for consumer goods and services only in the communities that participate in the process. No information on inflation (the general increase in prices over time) can be determined from these price indices. Cost of living data are useful as indicators of local economic conditions, but should be interpreted with caution. A relatively low cost of living is not necessarily a positive attribute for a community; and a relatively high cost of living is not necessarily negative. For example, relatively low prices may encourage job and population migration into the area; or relative low prices may mean that the area is depressed, and jobs and individuals are moving out of the area. For additional information, please contact: Dr. Clifford A. Lipscomb Director, Center for Business and Economic Research Langdale College of Business Administration Valdosta State University 1500 N. Patterson Street Valdosta, GA 31698-0075 Phone: 229-245-3774 Fax: 229-245-2248 E-mail: calipscomb@valdosta.edu 5