DCA Proposed Development Code Amendment to Subdivision Regulations. Division 51A-8.500, Subdivision Layout and Design

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51A, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No , as

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No , as

ORDINANCE NO An ordinance amending the zoning ordinances of the City of Dallas by permitting the following

ORDINANCE NO AMENDING CHAPTER 94 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE ORDINANCE, TEXAS), AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, BY AMENDING; RELATING

CITY OF HIGHLAND VILLAGE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO

14O ORDINANCE NO. 93Q 6. An ordinance amending Chapter 27, Minimum Urban Rehabilitation Standards, of the Dallas

ORDINANCE NO An ordinance amending the zoning ordinances of the City of Dallas by changing the zoning

ORDINANCE NO

TOWNSHIP OF NEPTUNE NOTICE OF FINAL ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO

CITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

ORDINANCE NO. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Abilene, Texas:

of this ordinance shall be construed as

ARTICLE 50. PD 50. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

a public hearing was held before the Parks and Recreation Board on June 11, 2009, to receive public input; and

TOWN OF FLOWER MOUND, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO.

ORDINANCE NO An ordinance changing the zoning classification on the following property:

k-. ..,.,.-- ORDINANCE NO. 894

Department of Planning & Development Services

Department of Planning & Development Services

Subject: Ordinance 1657, Annexation of 3.55 acres of land at 3015 and 3001 Parker Road.

ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP ANTRIM COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO

WEBSTER TOWNSHIP LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE. Summary Table of Amendments

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF KALAMAZOO KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. KALAMAZOO CHARTER TOWNSHIP SIDEWALK ORDINANCE

mandatory injunction to remove any previous violation hereof.

Sec Planned unit development (PUD) zoning district requirements and procedures.

Chapter Sidewalk Construction and Improvement Standards

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

TOWNSHIP OF HARTLAND ORDINANCE NO. 57-1, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE

Town of Prairie du Sac Sauk County, WI. Land Division Ordinance 07-3

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, no exceptions to applicable statewide planning goals numbers 2, 5, and 6 are proposed; and

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12)

ARTICLE 388. PD 388. Tenth Street Neighborhood

Billboard Relocation Code Amendments. City Council Transportation and Environment Committee March 23, 2009

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017

DIVISION 9. PLANNED URBAN DEVELOPMENT CLASSIFICATION BY SPECIAL USE FOR ALL ZONING DISTRICTS Sec Statement Of Purpose: (a) Planned

Town of Minden Subdivision Application

SECTION 10.8 PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) OVERLAY ZONE

/9/2009 ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Sections 27-3 and 27-4 of and adding Article IX (composed of Sections

STATE OF MICHIGAN COUNTY OF BERRIEN ORONOKO CHARTER TOWNSHIP LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE NO. 90

Appendix J - Planned Unit Development (PUD)

THE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF DOUGLAS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

WATAB TOWNSHIP, BENTON COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA. ORDINANCE #4 (Amended November 2014) AN ORDINANCE REGULATING TOWN ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY

REPORT TO PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION - CITY OF MARYLAND HEIGHTS

ADP Rescind 3 rd Reading

ARTICLE 887. PD 887. Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District

WAYNE COUNTY, UTAH SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE

(CONSOLIDATED TO BYLAW NO ) A BYLAW TO REGULATE MANUFACTURED HOME PARKS WITHIN THE CITY OF TERRACE

TOWN OF SPAFFORD LOCAL LAW

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF SUPERIOR WASHTENAW COUNTY, MICHIGAN PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 163

Mammoth Lakes Town Council Agenda Action Sheet

applicant; and JBI Partners, Inc., surveyor /engineer; have submitted a planned

THE BLUFFS AT CYPRESS CREEK SUBDIVISION

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION OF LAND REGULATIONS TITLE 17

COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ROCKWALL AS HERE-

SECTION 10.7 R-PUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE

SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

ARTICLE 759. PD 759. PD 759 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on June 27, (Ord. Nos.

PUD Ordinance - Caravelle Village #7 of 1995

ARTICLE 184. PD 184.

ORDINANCE NO.: Adopted: August 2, 2005 Amended: March 27, 2007 Amended: September 23, Fillmore County Rural Addressing Ordinance

saving clause; providing a severability clause; and in the public interest to grant this change

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

CITY OF SALISBURY ORDINANCE NO. 2175

TOWNSHIP OF EDENVILLE COUNTY OF MIDLAND STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO. 178 LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE TOWNSHIP OF EDENVILLE

WHITEWATER TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 32

Presented by: Michael G. Geier, PLS Snyder & Associates, Inc.

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE OFFICIAL CODE OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE RELATIVE TO CLUSTER OPTION DEVELOPMENTS

Town of Bristol Rhode Island

TITLE 25. SUBDIVISIONS 1

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

An ordinance changing the zoning classification on the following properties:

TOWNSHIP OF MANALAPAN ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

2/16/2016. City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:

City of Coral Gables Planning Department Staff Report

Memorandum: October 13, 2008 REVISED To: Trowbridge Township Planning Commission From: P. Hudson, AICP Re: Suggested New Ordinance

Charter Township of Bedford 115 S. ULDRIKS DRIVE BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN 49037

SECTION 16. "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT

a. To insure compatible relationships between land use activities;

A BY-LAW RESPECTING THE SUBDIVISION OF LAND IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF THE DISTRICT OF LUNENBURG

ORDINANCE NO An ordinance changing the zoning classification on the following property:

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Section 1 Purposes. 6. Section 2 Statutory Authorization. 7.

CONCEPT PLAN SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS Staff Report May 16, 2017

ORDINANCE NO Whereas, the Town has in place certain subdivision regulations as set forth in Title 9, Chapter 1 of the Town Code of Flagler; and

ORDINANCE NO. 782 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE AND OCCUPANCY OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE CITY OF WASHINGTON, KANSAS.

BOROUGH OF CONSHOHOCKEN MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. ORDINANCE NO 2 of 2013

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

Conditional Use Permit / Standard Subdivision Application

STATE OF MICHIGAN LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE NO.53

ORDINANCE NO. C-590(E0916)

ORDINANCE NO An ordinance amending the zoning ordinances of the City of Dallas by permitting the following

The Dallas City Code ARTICLE XI. HISTORIC PRESERVATION TAX EXEMPTIONS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES FOR HISTORIC PROPERTIES.

CITY OF DUNES CITY LANE COUNTY, OREGON ORDINANCE NO. 228

BY THE CITY COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO.:

This ordinance shall be known and cited as the Antrim County Street and Road Numbering Ordinance.

ORDINANCE NO. 14 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ADDRESS ORDINANCE DATE 1997 AMENDED NOVEMBER 15, 2005

Exhibit "A" have applied for a re-zoning and re-classification of that property from OPEN RURAL (OR) to that of a PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD); and

Transcription:

DCA 112-004 Proposed Development Code Amendment to Subdivision Regulations Division 51A-8.500, Subdivision Layout and Design City Council Economic Development Committee April 30, 2012 Department of Sustainable Development and Construction

Background Representatives from Dallas Independent School District requested that the City consider a code amendment to address a provision in the subdivision regulations that platted lots must conform in width, depth and area to the pattern already established in the adjacent areas. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 2

Background Currently Section 51A-8.503 of the Development Code has the following standard for lots under the requirements for subdivision layout and design: Lot size. The area of each platted lot must comply with the minimum regulations for the zoning district in which the lot is located. Lots must conform in width, depth and area to the pattern already established in the adjacent areas, having due regard to the character of the area, its particular suitability for development, and taking into consideration the natural topography of the ground, drainage, wastewater facilities, and the proposed layout of streets. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 3

Issues There are certain governmental related uses that are appropriate to locate in most zoning district classifications. Frequently these uses require greater lot areas than surrounding lots, particularly when located in single family residential zoning districts. These uses include parks, recreation centers, libraries, public schools, fire stations, and utilities such as water storage facilities and pump stations. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 4

Issues As a result of capital programs the city has platted several libraries, fire stations and recreation centers in the past several years that were in areas with smaller lots intended for residential uses. Similarly, area school districts have had to plat to accommodate both new schools and school expansions in areas with smaller lots intended for residential uses. Typically these plats have been approved but the current wording does not recognize the unique service these uses provide that are complimentary to and consistent with the lots in the surrounding area. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 5

Issues forwarddallas! includes several references to the importance of amenities such as schools and parks to serve neighborhoods. The purpose statements in the Development Code for single family zoning districts, such as the R-7.5(A) district, include language such as: This district is intended to be composed of single family dwellings together with public and private schools, churches, and public parks essential to create basic neighborhood units. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 6

Proposal Amend wording to allow for different consideration of property owned by a governmental entity intended for public use that is permitted in residential districts. Amend wording to give due consideration to present zoning of the property and appropriate lot configuration for permitted uses. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 7

Initial Proposal (a) Lot size. The area of each platted lot must comply with the minimum regulations for the zoning district in which the lot is located. Except for property owned by a governmental agency and intended to be used for a public purpose such as a fire station, library, park, school or utility use; [L]ots must conform in width, depth, and area to the pattern already established in the adjacent areas, having due regard to the character of the area, its particular suitability for development, its zoning and taking into consideration the natural topography of the ground, drainage, wastewater facilities, and the proposed layout of streets. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 8

CPC Recommendation (a) Lot size and pattern. (1) The width, depth, and area of each platted lot must comply with the minimum regulations for the zoning district in which the lot is located. (2) Lots in a planned development district must be platted in accordance with the conceptual plan or development plan of that district. Lots to be developed pursuant to a specific use permit must be platted in accordance with the site plan of that specific use permit. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 9

CPC Recommendation (cont) (3) Lots must conform in width, depth, and area to the pattern already established in the adjacent areas, except that this paragraph does not apply to: (A) Property owned by a governmental agency and intended to be used for a public purpose or building such as a fire station, library, park, school, or utility. (B) Property owned by a public utility and intended to be used for utility services. (C) Property in nonresidential districts where there is no established pattern of platted lots. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 10

CPC Recommendation (cont) (4) Platting must have [having] due regard for the area s existing structures, existing uses, zoning, and [to the] character. [of the area,] (5) Platting must take [its particular suitability for development, and taking] into consideration the property s suitability for development, [natural] topography [of the ground], drainage, [wastewater facilities], and [the] proposed layout of streets. City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 11

Sunset Pump Station City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 12

Cowart Elementary School City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 13

Salazar Elementary School City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 14

Lee Elementary School City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 15

City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 16

Next Steps Schedule for City Council Consideration on May 9, 2012 City Council Economic Development Committee April 16, 2012 17

3-2-12 ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51A, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No. 19455, as amended, of the Dallas City Code by amending Section 51A-8.503; providing that the width and depth of platted lots must comply with the minimum regulations for the zoning district; providing that lots in a planned development district must be platted in accordance with the conceptual plan or development plan of that district; providing that lots subject to a specific use permit must be platted in accordance with the site plan of that specific use permit; providing certain exceptions to the requirement that lots conform in width, depth, and area to the pattern already established in the adjacent areas; providing that platting must have due regard for the area s existing structures, existing uses, and zoning; providing a penalty not to exceed $2,000; providing a saving clause; providing a severability clause; and providing an effective date. WHEREAS, the city plan commission and the city council, in accordance with the Charter of the City of Dallas, the state law, and the ordinances of the City of Dallas, have given the required notices and have held the required public hearings regarding this amendment to the Dallas City Code; Now, Therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALLAS: SECTION 1. That Subsection (a), Lot Size, of Section 51A-8.503, Lots, of Division 51A-8.500, Subdivision Layout and Design, of Article VIII, Plat Regulations, of Chapter 51A, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No. 19455, as amended, of the Dallas City Code is amended to read as follows: DCA 112-xxx (Amend 51A-8.503 regarding lot size) - Page 1 DRAFT (As recommended by CPC)

(a) Lot size and pattern. (1) The width, depth, and area of each platted lot must comply with the minimum regulations for the zoning district in which the lot is located. (2) Lots in a planned development district must be platted in accordance with the conceptual plan or development plan of that district. Lots to be developed pursuant to a specific use permit must be platted in accordance with the site plan of that specific use permit. (3) Lots must conform in width, depth, and area to the pattern already established in the adjacent areas, except that this paragraph does not apply to: (A) Property owned by a governmental agency and intended to be used for a public purpose or building such as a fire station, library, park, school, or utility. for utility services. (B) Property owned by a public utility and intended to be used (C) established pattern of platted lots. Property in nonresidential districts where there is no (4) Platting must have [having] due regard for the area s existing structures, existing uses, zoning, and [to the] character. [of the area,] (5) Platting must take [its particular suitability for development, and taking] into consideration the property s suitability for development, [natural] topography [of the ground], drainage, [wastewater facilities], and [the] proposed layout of streets. SECTION 2. That a person violating a provision of this ordinance, upon conviction, is punishable by a fine not to exceed $2,000. SECTION 3. That Chapter 51A of the Dallas City Code shall remain in full force and effect, save and except as amended by this ordinance. SECTION 4. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance are severable and are governed by Section 1-4 of Chapter 1 of the Dallas City Code, as amended. DCA 112-xxx (Amend 51A-8.503 regarding lot size) - Page 2 DRAFT (As recommended by CPC)

SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and publication in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the City of Dallas, and it is accordingly so ordained. APPROVED AS TO FORM: THOMAS P. PERKINS, JR., City Attorney By Assistant City Attorney Passed DCA 112-xxx (Amend 51A-8.503 regarding lot size) - Page 3 DRAFT (As recommended by CPC)