SHAPING NEW BUILDINGS

Similar documents
Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

3.1 Existing Built Form

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

History of Broadview Avenue

AGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome

Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd.

5.1 Site Planning & Building Form

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT. For Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

This exercise is designed to explore desirable building height and massing within certain areas of the plan area.

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Architectural Narrative Columbia & Hawthorn responds to its unique location as a gateway to Little Italy and the Bay in several ways. 1. The visual ch

Town Center Joint Commission Public Hearing #1: January 20, 2016

College Avenue. Sowers Street. Calder Way. Beaver Avenue

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

1. Set the location of building envelope requirements at the minimum setback line versus at the façade plane.

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

38 th & Blake Height Amendments: Public Meeting #5 Building Design Comments July 13 th, 2016

Plan Dutch Village Road

Redline Document Conventions

We contacted all RNOs in the area to come to their meetings and personally explain the draft, and take questions. Four RNOs took us up on the offer,

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

CITY OF BRAMPTON COMPREHENSIVE ZONING BY-LAW REVIEW. Technical Paper #1 Mixed Use & Intensification Areas

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications Final Report

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-32, 50 Cumberland Street Official Plan and Zoning Amendment - Final Report

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT CODEAU BUILDING LTD RIDEAU STREET OTTAWA DECEMBER 2013

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

10-16 Wellesley Street West, 5-7 St. Nicholas Street and 586 Yonge Street Zoning Amendment Refusal Report

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

TOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages

Town of Siler City - Unified Development Ordinance ARTICLE XII - Density and Dimensional Regulations

November 17, 2004/Calendar No. 22

Article 7. URBAN CENTER (C-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

ORDINANCE NO. 15- Regulations (LDR) which would further the codification of TOD regulations that

The Town of Parker, Colorado

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

SECTION 822 "R-1-A" AND "R-1-AH" - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

566 Hilson Ave & 148 Clare St., Ottawa Planning Rationale June 20 th, 2014 Prepared by Rosaline J. Hill, B.E.S., B.Arch., O.A.A.

PLANNING REPORT: BANK STREET SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION

90 and 100 Simcoe Street, 130 Pearl Street, and 203, 207 and 211 Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

Small Lot Housing Code (June 2013):

Submission 1 - April 21, 2015

Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

Compatible-Scale Infill Housing (R-2 Zones) Project

Oceanfront Resort District

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

Eglinton Avenue East and 3-7 Cardiff Road Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications Request for Direction

A New Zoning Code for a 21st Century Los Angeles

H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone

STAFF REPORT PLN December 9, 2013

Side Setback Amendments to the (RF3) Small Scale Infill Development Zone Options to amend side setbacks for Row Housing

Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

New Zoning Ordinance Program

Article Zoning District Regulations

40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Small Lot Housing Code

Code Update Process For: Downtown Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB)

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT

Church Street and 117 Dundas Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

412 Church Street Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

4.2.8 Westwood/VA Hospital Station Area

SCHEDULE 32 TO CLAUSE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY

1 Application Form 4

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

- Urban Growth Centre (Downtown) Zones (UGC)

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

The tower has helped manage urban density, but it often fails to honor qualities of life on the street. Now we have the opportunity to change that.

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

ORDINANCE NO. 16- WHEREAS, said Code included Title 12, which is the City s Land Use Ordinance; and

Staff Report and Recommendation Based on the criteria for review in the Denver Zoning Code, Staff recommends approval for application #2017I

2450 Victoria Park Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Class Lecture #2: Zoning

CHAPTER 8. REVISION HISTORY

Table of Contents E.3 Light and Glare - Glare

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

MOTEL STRIP LOCATION 1. VIEW CORRIDORS/RESIDENTIAL STREETS URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

th Avenue NW Early Design Guidance Meeting - SDCI # EDG Meeting

85, 87, 89, 91 Broadway Avenue & 198 Redpath Avenue Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications Request for Direction Report

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.

DIVISION 1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

Transcription:

How does it look from the street? The proposed bulk controls result in more sky and light at the street level. Mid-rise Development No bulk controls Draft Plan Controls: Setbacks only Bigger Sky The streetwalls open up and people on the street see and feel more of the sky. Current Proposal: Setbacks with apparent mass reductions What s different? More sunlight Sculpted building tops shape and provide more light on the ground

Vision The vision of the Central SoMa Plan is to support substantial density while maintaining significant light, air, and sun access to the streets. Mid-rise Development Central SoMa is primarily designed to be a mid-rise district, with buildings of 85 feet to 160 feet. To support this density while still supporting light, air, and sun access to the streets, the Plan proposes to: Create a clear streetwall At 85 feet in height, buildings will be required to have a 15 foot setback along every property line. 15 Simultaneously provide openness to the sky and architectural diversity Between 85 to 160 feet in height, buildings will be required to substantially reduce what is visible from the street. Individual buildings will have architectural flexibility on how to achieve this goal. High-rise Development Central SoMa will allow a handful of buildings taller than 160 feet, to punctuate important intersections (such as at the Caltrain station). To support height at these locations while still supporting light, air, and sun access to the streets, the Plan proposes to: 115 Keep towers separated Towers could not be any closer than 115 feet (the width of street plus required setbacks) unless they had substantially smaller floor sizes. 15 Ensure thinner towers than in downtown The maximum floor size will be 15,000 square feet for office uses, and residential and hotel uses could not exceed 12,000 square feet. The maximum length of any side of a tower will be 150 feet. Create a clear streetwall At 85 feet in height, buildings will be required to have a 15 foot setback along every property line. Alleys and Small Streets Small streets and alleys in Central SoMa offer special neighborhood character. To maintain this character by supporting light, air, and sun access to these streets, the Plan proposes to: Ensure sun access to the north side of the street Development on the south side of small streets and alleys will be required to step back at a 45 degree angle from the street (in keeping with current Planning Code requirements). This requirement will be extended to the south side of north-south alleys in addition to east-west alleys. 60 Ensure light and air to the south side of the street Development on the north side of small streets and alleys buildings will be required to substantially reduce what is visible from the street. Individual buildings will have architectural flexibility on how to achieve this goal

CENTRAL SOMA PLAN S HAPI N G N E W B U I LDI N GS What kinds of buildings would result? The apparent mass reduction encourages architects to be more creative in how they reduce what is visible from the street This project includes both high-rise and low-rise development. The large setback and mass reduction allows the new buildings to reflect the scale of the historic ones across the street. Many projects on Market Street vary their front facades providing both a beautiful and interesting scene for pedestrians and significant interior space for offices and retail. This project adds a new building to a historic one by pushing the mass farther back and giving deference to it s street facade and character. Large stepbacks help break long walls The apparent mass reduction allows architects flexibility so that the tops of the buildings do not always need to be reduced by itself. The sculpting at the top can connect creatively to other aspects of the facade. While the corner is strongly pronounced, this project layers the top floors back in interesting and shaped ways, opening up the edge to the street. This project breaks the scale of the top of the building to give a finer sense of its residential use. Smaller sculpting creates elegant building tops

How does it look from the street? The proposed bulk controls result in more sky and light at the street level. High-rise Development No bulk controls Draft Plan/Current Proposal: Setbacks and floorplate area controls Alleys and Small Streets No bulk controls Draft Plan/Current Proposal: Sun angle and setbacks

Getting Technical: how does the apparent mass reduction work? An apparent mass reduction reduces the visual impact of density and allows architects more design flexibility than traditional setbacks. Measuring the reduction While the apparent mass reduction is a small effort in calculation, this can be done easily in software commonly available to architects: 1. To test a design, first draw lines from the opposite of the street lot lines to points or corners on the building above. 2. Then make a plane from the project property line along the street up to the remaining height of the building. 3. Where those lines intersect that plane, draw connecting lines to show the projected face of the building. 4. By comparing the full plane with the plane just made, one can calculate the percent reduction. Example

Getting Technical: which parts of the building are reduced? The amount of reduction required depends on site orientation. On Major Streets DRAFT DRAFT goal: of by 67% of by 50% of 160 160 by 70% The additional ~24% reduction The additional ~5% reduction The additional ~45% reduction The additional ~35% reduction goal: of by 80% reduces apparent mass by ~45% reduces apparent mass by ~45% reduces apparent mass by ~35% reduces apparent mass by ~35% Street - 82.5 ROW Street - 82.5 ROW On Small Streets and Alleys goal: of by 100% (Upper Buliding should not be visible from opposite of by 50% goal: of by 100% (Upper Buliding should not be visible from opposite of by 70% 65 The additional ~5% reduction 65 The additional ~60% reduction The additional ~20% reduction The additional ~40% reduction reduces apparent mass by ~45% reduces apparent mass by ~50% reduces apparent mass by ~60% reduces apparent mass by ~40% Street - ROW Street - ROW goal: of by 100% (Upper Buliding should not be visible from opposite of by 85% While the reductions are shown as stepbacks, this is only a graphic device to express the building edge, not design expectations. The additional ~70% reduction The additional ~45% reduction reduces apparent mass by ~40% reduces apparent mass by ~30% Street - ROW