Local Government Snapshot

Similar documents
Quarterly Indicators. Q Activity Snapshot + 3.5% + 3.1% % Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales.

Annual Report on the New York State Market FOR RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE ACTIVITY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Annual Report on the New York State Market FOR RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE ACTIVITY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Local Government Snapshot

APPENDIX A E-FILING MATTERS (commenced on or after December 15, 2015,* unless otherwise indicated) [corrected 12/17/15] SUPREME COURT

ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES

Local Board/Association Presidents, Executive Officers, and NYSAR Regional Vice Presidents

Plattsburgh Housing Authority

New York Highlights: Northeast Downstate

2018 HUD Program Income Limits & Mitchell-Lama Alternate Income Criteria

Fiscal Stress Monitoring System 2017 List. January 25, Economic Development Region Type of Stress Fiscal Score Environmental Rating

Town of Cicero. Cicero Commons Project. Report of Examination ALAN G. HEVESI. Period Covered: March 1, September 30, M-82

Fiscal Stress Monitoring System 2018 List Copyright 2013 The New York State Office of the State Comptroller

GAR ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF: DAVID M. CARLON

District: nd Street, Howard Beach, NY Albany: 617 Legislative Office Bldg., Albany, NY 12247

Albany: 304 Legislative Office Bldg., Albany, NY District: 414 State Capitol Building, Albany, NY 12247

CMS APPROVED NEW YORK ATTORNEY LIST

RADON SURVEY OF RECENT HOME BUYERS

INTRODUCTION EXPLANATION OF TABLES: TABLE I - OVERLAPPING REAL PROPERTY TAX LEVIES

Office of Community Development State Street/Hampton Plaza Albany, NY 12207

Capital Programs Manual

Our High Property Taxes Do Our Assessors Make up the Rules? Real Estate In-Depth November, 2012 By: Edward I. Sumber, Esq.*

October 10, THIRD QUARTER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SALES REPORT Westchester, Putnam, Rockland and Orange Counties, New York

NEW YORK BIRD LIST REPORTS 2004

New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) Introduction. Statutory authority

October 11, THIRD QUARTER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SALES REPORT Westchester, Putnam, Rockland and Orange Counties, New York

National Legislative Program Evaluation Society September 19, Pennsylvania Legislative Budget and Finance Committee

GAR ASSOCIATES, INC. PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS OF: M. SCOTT ALLEN

Greater Syracuse Property Development Corporation

2018 ANNUAL AND 4TH QUARTER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SALES REPORT Westchester, Putnam, Rockland, Orange and Sullivan Counties, New York

One Host, One Home: New York City (February 2017 Update)

HGAR HUDSON GATEWAY ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, INC.

NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS CERTIFICATION FOR THE SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 STATE PRIMARY ELECTION

Town of Aurora. Real Property Acquisition and Sale REPORT OF EXAMINATION 2018M-64 SEPTEMBER 2018

2018 SECOND QUARTER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SALES REPORT Westchester, Putnam, Rockland and Orange Counties, New York

Monthly Indicators + 1.4% % % Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

GAR ASSOCIATES, INC. APPRAISAL QUALIFICATIONS OF RONALD J. RUBINO, MAI

REAL PROPERTY TAX BASE, MARKET VALUES, AND MARCELLUS SHALE: 2007 TO 2009

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK 12236

Hudson Valley Home Sales Continue to Increase, But at Lower Rate

How Prevailing Wages Can Imperil the Development of Affordable Housing in New York State

Contract Drafting and Negotiation. Karl B. Holtzschue, Esq. New York, New York

2016 Land Trust Grants - New York State Conservation Partnership Program. Detailed Roster of 2016 Conservation Partnership Program Grant Awards

April 11, FIRST QUARTER REAL ESTATE SALES REPORT Westchester, Putnam, Rockland and Orange Counties, New York

Comptroller's Review of the Costs of Real Property Tax Assessment in Erie County

How to Contest Your Assessment

QUESTIONS? CALL THE ASSESSOR S OFFICE

IMPACT OF PROPOSED ROLL BACK OF AD VALOREM TAX REVENUES ON FLORIDA S COUNTIES

What is a Small Claims Assessment Review (SCAR)?

2018 Land Trust Grants - New York State Conservation Partnership Program

2011 SECOND QUARTER RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE SALES REPORT Westchester and Putnam Counties, New York

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

Annual Vendor Marketing Packet. We invite you to join in the new energy and focus of AIAENY!

Top 30 Schools in League--6th Grade (71 Schools)

Advertising Rates Effective January 1, Real Estate

Economic Impact of Commercial Multi-Unit Residential Property Transactions in Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver,

Appraisers and Assessors of Real Estate

JESSIE A. RAVAGE 34 Delaware Street

INTRODUCTION: DIFFERENCES IN PRACTICE BETWEEN DOWNSTATE AND UPSTATE by Karl B. Holtzschue, Esq.

Now is a great time to explore your options with Oxford

2016 ANNUAL AND FOURTH QUARTER REAL ESTATE SALES REPORT Westchester, Putnam, Rockland and Orange Counties, New York

LIHTC Properties in Franklin County

Chapter13. Taxes and Assessments. IN THIS CHAPTER Taxes are what we pay for civilized society. 1

ADDrESS federal ID (fein) 12/31/18

CONSOLIDATION INCENTIVE AID

New York State Homes Community Renewal Statewide Housing Choice Voucher Program Local Administrator May 2018

What To Do If You Disagree With Your Assessment

MEMORANDUM. Apportionment Methodologies

HGAR HUDSON GATEWAY ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, INC.

We hope the trends provide additional perspective on your county s work. We know it provided valuable insight on the work we do here at Revenue.

Appendix D HOUSING WORK GROUP REPORT JULY 10, 2002

Guide for Estimating Affordability and Cap Exclusions for 2018 Deliveries

2018 Illinois and Western Indiana Health Alliance Group Medicare

Justification Review. Right-of-Way Acquisition Program Florida Department of Transportation Report August 1999

Acquisition, Land Records, and Abandonment

2017 Property Value Study Preliminary Findings Released by Comptroller of Public Accounts Property Tax Assistance Division

REAL ESTATE MARKET AND YOUR TAX

Hennepin County Economic Analysis Executive Summary

2012 Indiana Tax Credit Rental Housing Survey

Reducing Regulatory Burden; Enforcing the Regulatory Reform Agenda Under Executive Order 13777, Docket No. FR-6030-N-01

Housing Indicators in Tennessee

Pennsylvania Tax Credit Rental Housing Survey

What does the Census of 2000 tell us about

HGAR HUDSON GATEWAY ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS, INC.

STATEWIDE SECTION 8 VOUCHER PROGRAM Section. 8 Housing Choice Voucher Administrative Plan. Effective November 17, 2017

2017 LIHTC Rent and Income Limits for 50% and 60%

December Commissioner. Robert D. Plattner

CALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS

3. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 29

ESSEX COUNT Y, NEW JERSEY MARKET REPORT THIRD QUARTER

Assessment-To-Sales Ratio Study for Division III Equalization Funding: 1999 Project Summary. State of Delaware Office of the Budget

An Update: Affordability and Availability of Rental Housing in Pennsylvania

A Study of the Feasibility of Consolidating Assessment and Code Enforcement Functions in Schuyler County, New York

City of Bellingham Urban Growth Area - Land Supply Analysis Summary

The History and Science behind the Legal Defense Reserves Calculator

Economic Impacts of MLS Home Sales and Purchases in Canada and the Provinces

Economic Impacts of MLS Home Sales and Purchases In The province of Québec and The Greater Montréal Area

PURCHASE APPLICATION FOR EASTERN RAIL YARD TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS DATA SHEET. Applicant Information Name: Address:

Policy briefing: Avoiding unnecessary evictions among social tenants in Wales

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

Transcription:

N Minimum Maximum Sum Assessmen t Costs_CY 2009 Valid N 57 NE W YORK STATE OFFICE (listwise) OF THE STATE COMP TROLLER Thomas P. DiNapoli State Comptroller May 2011 Sum LG Class Code 03 60797625 Real property tax assessment is an important function of local governments. In 2009, New York s city, county, 04 3122589 town and village assessing units spent nearly $132 Total million 78189527 and employed roughly 1,350 certified assessors, tax directors and assessment appraisers. 1 According to the Office of Real Property Tax Services (ORPTS), New York arguably has the most complex property tax system in the nation. 2 Most states have fewer than 100 assessing units; only seven have over 500. New York has approximately 1,110. Local governments should explore sharing this function to achieve costsavings and improve the quality of assessments. In a recent survey of elected municipal officials in Dutchess County, undertaken by Hudson Valley Pattern for Progress, there appeared to be a strong willingness to consider sharing of the assessment function. The majority of municipalities surveyed (18 of 30) were either already engaged in a shared assessing arrangement or were planning to do so. 3 Of the 1,110 assessing units, 981 are towns and cities, and 2 are counties. There are 127 villages that also assess property within their borders for village tax purposes creating a second assessment on each property within the village, because each property in the village is also assessed by the town (or towns) or county in which the village lies for county, town and school tax purposes. Report AssCosts_ 09 - plugged with 2008 where possible 02 14269312 Descriptive Statistics Std. Deviation 57 0 25559000 53588418 ######### Reducing the Cost of Tax Assessment Through Shared Services Assessment Costs by Class of Government (2009) Millions 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 - $61 Note: Excludes New York City $54 County 41% $14 City 11% $3 46% 60,797,625 Town 41% 53,588,418 County 11% 14,269,312 City 2% 3,122,589 Village 131,777,945 Total Village 2% Town County City Village Town 46% Estimated Savings from Shared Assessing (Statewide Estimates, excluding New York City and Villages) More Conservative Estimate Less Conservative Estimate Savings Cost a Savings Cost Share Assessors $2.7 Million Share Assessors $6.1 Million Reduce Certiorari $5.1 Million Reduce Certiorari $7.6 Million Update Assessments $4.3 Million Update Assessments $4.3 Million Eliminate Duplication $3.1 Million Eliminate Duplication $3.1 Million Total $10.9 Million $4.3 Million Total $16.8 Million $4.3 Million Net Savings $6.6 Million Net Savings $12.5 Million a The cost figure shown represents the statistical difference in costs for municipalities that have reassessed since 2005 as applied to those who have not. It does not represent the cost of reassessing property. 1 Includes assessing positions for which certification is required. Does not include village assessors, New York City, or support staff. ORPTS, March 2010. 2 New York State Office of Real Property Tax Services, Reforming New York s Property Tax System, www.orps.state.ny.us/reform/. 3 Examining Shared Services Potential in Dutchess County: A Discussion Brief on Municipal Efficiency.Hudson Valley Pattern for Progress. April 2011. D i v i s i o n o f L o c a l G o v e r n m e n t a n d S c h o o l A c c o u n t a b i l i t y

Local governments could save as much as $12.5 million by improving assessment practices and sharing this function, (total savings of $16.8 million, offset by initial estimated costs of $4.3 million). Municipalities on Long Island and in the Mid-Hudson Region had the greatest overall assessment costs, spending more than $65.4 million (nearly 50 percent of the statewide total) on the assessing function. In 2009, New York s cities, towns, villages and counties spent nearly $132 million assessing over 4.6 million parcels. On average, this translates into $28.53 per parcel, ranging from $11.73 per parcel in Oneida County to as much as $64.49 per parcel in Nassau County. The variability among counties in the cost of assessment per parcel of property is the result of many factors, including the number of assessing units and the quality of assessments (see Appendix 1 for assessment costs by county). In general, assessment costs are higher downstate ($34.70/parcel) than upstate ($25.59/parcel). Among upstate regions, costs were highest in the North Country ($30.76/parcel) and lowest, on average, in the Western New York Region ($22.49/parcel). Overlapping Assessment Costs per Parcel for Upstate and Downstate Counties (2009) $40.00 $35.00 $30.00 $25.00 $20.00 $15.00 $10.00 $5.00 $0.00 $34.70 Downstate $25.59 Upstate Note: Average of counties. County figures are based on total assessment expenditures for the county plus that of the towns, cities, and villages located in the county. Factors that Can Lower the Cost and Improve the Quality of Assessments It is difficult to compare assessment costs across municipalities because local conditions and the quality of local assessments differ. For example, a town with above average assessment costs may have just conducted a reassessment or may be paying for more highly skilled assessment staff. To determine the net costs/savings associated with various assessment practices, we used a set of statistical models to examine factors that affect assessment costs, while holding constant other quality factors that also affect costs. This methodology seeks to determine the net effects of different assessment practices on assessment costs. Multi-Jurisdictional Assessing in New York State Single Assessor Multijurisdictional Assessor Countywide Assessment New York City

Shared Assessing Based on data from ORPTS, roughly half of the State s assessing units share an assessor with at least one other assessing unit. Our analysis indicates that municipalities that share assessors saved on average 7.2 percent ($2.05 per parcel) in assessment costs. Thus, if municipalities were to move to a shared assessor model, savings could range from $2.7 to $6.1 million statewide. Greater efficiency in operations is not the only benefit to be realized by utilizing a shared services model. By combining resources, smaller towns and villages may have the means to utilize a more professionalized pool of assessors, resulting in improved quality assessing. Cities and Towns by Last Reassessment 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 12% 1970s/Or Earlier 5% 14% 69% 1980s 1990s 2000s Reassess Regularly Many local governments do not reassess properties regularly. Local governments with outdated assessments are more susceptible to lawsuits brought by property owners challenging their assessments (known as tax certiorari proceedings). If a taxpayer is successful in a tax certiorari proceeding, the taxing jurisdiction will usually be required to issue refunds of excess taxes collected due to the erroneous assessment. In most cases, court-ordered assessment reductions and settlements of tax certioraris result in a shift of the property tax burden onto the remaining tax base, leading to higher tax bills for all other taxpayers. Nearly 70 percent of cities and towns have reassessed since 2000. However, 12 percent have not reassessed since the 1970s or earlier. While reassessment increases costs in the short-term, these costs can be offset by reductions in the number of assessment challenges. Based on a county-level analysis, counties where 90 percent or more of the cities and towns had reassessed since 2005 had roughly 4 tax certiorari proceedings per 10,000 parcels. However, in counties where only 50 percent or fewer of the cities and towns had reassessed since 2005, the number of proceedings increased to 18 per 10,000 parcels a four-fold increase. 4 4 The map above was obtained from the ORPTS website: www.orps.state.ny.us/assessor/resources/reassessmentactivity.cfm

Number of Tax Certiorari Cases by Region (2008 and 2009) Region Tax Certiorari Cases 2008 2009 Percentage Change in Cases 2008-09 Certiorari Measures Percentage of Cases in 2009 Percent of Parcels in 2009 Cases Per 10,000 Parcels Capital Region 486 650 33.7% 4.3% 10.5% 13.4 Central NY 230 265 15.2% 1.7% 7.4% 7.8 Finger Lakes 268 275 2.6% 1.8% 10.6% 5.6 Mohawk Valley 114 131 14.9% 0.9% 5.3% 5.4 North Country 150 146-2.7% 1.0% 5.5% 5.7 Southern Tier 205 258 25.9% 1.7% 8.0% 7.0 Western NY 340 534 57.1% 3.5% 13.9% 8.3 Long Island 8,304 8,790 5.9% 57.7% 21.8% 87.3 Mid-Hudson 3,562 4,178 17.3% 27.4% 17.1% 52.9 Total 13,659 15,227 11.5% 100.0% 100.0% 33.0 Source: Office of Real Property Tax Services Statewide, there were over 15,000 tax certiorari proceedings in 2009 an increase of 12 percent from 2008. Over 85 percent of the 2009 total are in the downstate area. The Long Island region has a disproportionately high percentage of cases with 58 percent of the State s certiorari proceedings and only 22 percent of the parcels. With more than 87 cases per 10,000 parcels, assessment challenges in the Long Island region occur more than twice as frequently as the statewide average. Based on our analysis, every ten certiorari cases per 10,000 parcels add an additional 4.1 percent to the cost of assessment. If the counties with above average rates of certiorari cases could reduce their number of cases by a half or even a third, substantial savings could result estimates range from $5.1 million to $7.6 million statewide. This is a conservative figure since it may not include all of the additional costs such as litigation fees, appraisal costs and other fees associated with defending tax certiorari cases. Reduce the Number of Assessing Units Over the past 17 years, many villages have terminated their status as assessing units, opting instead to use town and county assessment rolls. Only 127 of the 555 villages in New York State retained the assessing function. If these villages were to use the town assessments, rather than conduct a second assessment, villages could save $3 million. Long Island villages account for nearly $1.76 million (56 percent) of the statewide village total.

Appendix 1: Overlapping Assessment Costs Per Parcel by Cost Category Cost Range County Total Assessment Costs Parcels Cost Per Parcel Over $30/Parcel Over $20/Parcel Over $10/Parcel Nassau $27,264,619 422,748 $64.49 Orange $5,296,657 138,177 $38.33 Westchester $9,392,167 257,429 $36.48 Schuyler $458,605 12,839 $35.72 Ontario $1,727,142 48,830 $35.37 Putnam $1,518,037 43,283 $35.07 Seneca $623,983 17,887 $34.88 Essex $1,371,773 39,442 $34.78 Wayne $1,488,520 43,389 $34.31 Clinton $1,279,234 38,249 $33.44 Saratoga $3,179,843 95,271 $33.38 Rockland $2,923,819 88,315 $33.11 Hamilton $425,349 13,339 $31.89 Cayuga $1,249,559 39,482 $31.65 Jefferson $1,789,914 57,248 $31.27 Schoharie $704,554 22,744 $30.98 Cortland $684,545 22,376 $30.59 Columbia $1,071,183 35,944 $29.80 Ulster $2,578,546 87,069 $29.61 Yates $466,428 15,812 $29.50 Cattaraugus $1,497,944 50,974 $29.39 St. Lawrence $1,929,175 66,012 $29.22 Steuben $1,617,874 55,624 $29.09 Dutchess $3,146,623 109,740 $28.67 Franklin $894,103 31,213 $28.65 Genesee $804,967 28,521 $28.22 Herkimer $1,154,667 41,531 $27.80 Lewis $649,729 23,886 $27.20 Sullivan $1,758,776 65,891 $26.69 Livingston $763,949 28,860 $26.47 Rensselaer $1,591,951 64,880 $24.54 Tompkins $845,975 34,513 $24.51 Warren $1,086,528 45,729 $23.76 Delaware $1,021,841 43,373 $23.56 Wyoming $555,984 23,764 $23.40 Greene $888,454 38,218 $23.25 Monroe $6,025,473 262,890 $22.92 Allegany $770,556 33,808 $22.79 Niagara $2,134,567 93,897 $22.73 Washington $790,896 34,792 $22.73 Albany $2,511,463 110,984 $22.63 Schenectady $1,300,765 58,281 $22.32 Broome $1,861,136 86,156 $21.60 Chautauqua $2,003,088 93,665 $21.39 Onondaga $3,792,556 180,732 $20.98 Oswego $1,247,423 59,717 $20.89 Chemung $822,322 39,521 $20.81 Orleans $413,040 20,466 $20.18 Madison $752,993 37,451 $20.11 Suffolk $11,563,944 583,685 $19.81 Fulton $667,967 33,914 $19.70 Chenango $623,465 31,909 $19.54 Otsego $735,664 39,467 $18.64 Montgomery $463,072 25,626 $18.07 Erie $5,949,289 368,215 $16.16 Tioga $401,775 25,698 $15.63 Oneida $1,243,474 105,965 $11.73 Total $131,777,945 4,619,441 $28.53 Note: Overlapping assessment costs were calculated by summing together the assessment costs reported by the county, and the assessment costs reported by towns, cities and villages within each county. The number of parcels is a countywide parcel count. Three counties (Oneida, Erie and Rockland) did not report assessment costs.

New York State Office of the State Comptroller Division of Local Government and School Accountability 110 State Street, 12th Floor Albany, New York 12236 w w w. o s c. s t a t e. n y. u s May 2011