NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Board Agenda Letter

Similar documents
SERVICE CONTRACTS (except for A/E professional services) AND PURCHASE CONTRACTS (purchasing apparatus, supplies, materials, or equipment)

BOARD OF TRUSTEES JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO RESOLUTION NO 16-38

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of San José ( City ) has an interest in promoting affordable housing within the City; and

The President is authorized to delegate this authority to the Vice President for Administration and Treasurer.

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence Planning and Building. Steve Monowitz, Community Development Director

SCHOOL BUSINESS LAW: THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW IN THIS ECONOMY

Why haven t you joined the MRESC Co-op #65MCESCCPS? Call me. Let s talk about the benefits of joining!

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Common Audit Findings Related to Purchasing and How to Avoid Them

SECTION: Purchasing Policy ORIGINAL ISSUE DATE: March 18, 2014 PAGE 1 OF 33 COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT PURCHASING POLICY REVISION DATE:

PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS REQUIRED UNDER GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW SECTIONS 103 and 104-B.

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

CONTRACTING - BID LAWS

School District Bidding Requirements Under North Dakota Law NDSBA Fall School Law Seminar Nicholas C. Grant Ebeltoft. Sickler. Lawyers.

LWDB PROCUREMENT / PROPERTY MANAGEMENT POLICY

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A NEW COUNCIL POLICY No ENTITLED SURPLUS SALES

HPL PROCUREMENT POLICIES HAMBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES AS REQUIRED UNDER GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW SECTIONS 103 and 104-B.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

DIVISION 2. PURCHASES, CONTRACTS AND SALE OF PROPERTY* Sec Purchasing agent. Sec Purchase and contractual requirements generally.

EAST BATON ROUGE REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY PROCUREMENT CONTRACTING AND DBE POLICY FOR FEDERALLY FUNDED PROJECTS.

Order of Business. Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Financial Responsibilities. Financial Responsibilities. Financial Responsibilities MUNICIPAL ELECTED OFFICIALS /18/2018

HENRICO COUNTY NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

3. Adopt the Preliminary Use and Management Plan for the property granted to the District.

McMULLIN AREA GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AGENCY

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Nebraska Association of County Officials

City of Calistoga Staff Report

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Agenda Item No. 6E May 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR

PROCUREMENT POLICY PURCHASING GUIDELINES CONTRACT AND SURPLUS AUTHORITY

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1602

CTAS e-li. Published on e-li ( July 22, 2018 County Purchasing Law of 1957

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA

State of Rhode Island. National Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan. July 29, 2016

7300 DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY

The ABC s of New Buildings: Architects, Bonds and Construction

HENRICO COUNTY NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

230.2 Procurement Thresholds (Goods and Non-Professional Services)

Administration s Finance Office Approval Date: 4/10/12 Effective Date: 4/10/12 Capital Assets and Property Review Date:

PUBLIC PROCUREMENT BASICS

Contracts and Purchasing. Contracts and Purchasing. Competitive Bid Law Legal Authority for Boards. AASBO Certificate Program April 21 and 22, 2014

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

INFORMATION FOR VENDORS DOING BUSINESS WITH THE CITY OF CORAL SPRINGS, FLORIDA FINANCIAL SERVICES DEPT

Item 10C 1 of 69

Request for Proposals for Commercial Real Estate Brokerage Services Port Angeles, Washington. Issued June 6, 2016

Intent: To establish a policy and guidelines for all procurement activities in the city. SECTION I: Purpose of Purchasing Policies...

Disclaimer. Legal Authority. Purchasing Solutions/Bid Law Update 4/30/2015. Code of Alabama 1975, Section 16-13B- 1, et seq.

City of Atwater Purchasing System Manual

REPORT. Action to Amend Appendix A of San Diego Housing Commission Conflict of Interest Code and Related Provisions

Chapter 16 PROCUREMENT. Procurement through NMSA Purchasing Discounts 13-1A-1 through 13-1A-4 NMSA 1978

Policy and Resources Committee Meeting 2 nd June 2015

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

10.a. Staff Report. Date: July 12, City Council. Valerie J. Barone, City Manager

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Lender s e-amc, LLC. Vendor Management Services (VMS) Program. Statement of Policies & Standards

Reprinted in part from Volume 24, Number 4, March 2014 (Article starting on page 319 in the actual issue) ARTICLE

yjryly AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 20, 2018 Item Number: To: From:

RESOLUTION NO. PC

REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND CONSTRUCTION RELATED CONTRACTS WITH VALUES OF LESS THAN $200,000

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

San Joaquin County Grand Jury. Getting Rid of Stuff - Improving Disposal of City and County Surplus Public Assets Case No.

[Disposition and Development Agreement - Seawall Lot 337 Associates, LLC - Mission Rock Project]

HUNTINGDON SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT PROCUREMENT PLAN CHILD NUTRITION PROGRAM

Lindsay A. Thorson, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo Margie Padron, Long Beach Community College District SUMMARY OF SURPLUS PROPERTY PROCEDURES

SURPLUS PROPERTY SALES PROCEDURES. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING COMMITTEE May 1, 2006

Discussion of the Alabama Competitive Bid Law and Public Works Law

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION HIGHSPIRE, PENNSYLVANIA FORMAL TELEPHONE MEETING MARCH 7, :00 A.M. AGENDA

Version Date Comments / Changes 1.0 June 2006 Initial Policy Released 2.0 June 2012 Revised 3.0 November 2017 Revised

MEETING DATE: 08/1/2017 ITEM NO: 16 TOWN OF LOS GATOS COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: JULY 27, 2017 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL LAUREL PREVETTI, TOWN MANAGER

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council

Purchasing Guide. MTAS MORe. Published on MTAS ( November 06, 2018

13-1 CHAPTER 13 BIDS AND CONTRACTS

TOWN OF LINCOLN INVITATION TO BID 2018 TOWN CALENDAR RFP #

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

Legal Update for Public Works Officers League of California Cities

What is the Omni-Circular Final Guidance on the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principals and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

A. Approval / Disapproval of Resolution No : Adopting a Fair Housing Policy.

SEE BELOW SEPTEMBER 20, 2007

HOA 101: Agenda. A. Types of Common Interest Developments. C. Laws Governing Common Interest Developments

Questions and Answers to the RFP for Professional Property Management Bid

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET. DATE: January 12, 2018 HCR18-002

H. UNIVERSITY PROCUREMENT CODE

NORWICH PROPERTY REHABILITATION PROGRAM

REPORT. Amendment to the Contract for Property Management Services for Hotel Sandford

EQUIPMENT LEASING SOLUTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

RELOCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (RAP) BOOKLET THE 10 MINUTE MANAGER

Office of the State Auditor & Inspector. Gary A. Jones, CPA, CFE

Florida Gulf Coast University Board of Trustees September 14, 2004

Prepared by Office of Procurement and Real Property Management. This replaces Administrative Procedure No. A8.215 dated November 2012 A8.

ORDINANCE NO. XXXX. WHEREAS, the proposed Rezone has been processed pursuant to Section , Title 9 of the Municipal Code; and

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

DWR REAL ESTATE COORDINATION PLAN

A. Approval / Disapproval of Resolution No : Adopting a Fair Housing Policy.

Transcription:

Agenda Date: 5/1/2012 Agenda Placement: 7H NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Board of Supervisors Lederer, Steven - Interim Director of Public Works Public Works REPORT BY: Juan Arias, ENGINEERING MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS - 259-8374 SUBJECT: Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act Ordinance - Increasing Informal Bidding Limits (2nd reading) RECOMMENDATION Interim Director of Public Works requests the second reading and adoption of an ordinance amending Napa County Code Sections 2.38.010, 2.38.040, and 2.38.050 to Increase the Informal Bidding Thresholds and Contracting Authority of the Purchasing Agent and Director of Public Works under the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (Section 22000, et seq. of the Public Contract Code). ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed action is not a project as defined by 14 California Code of Regulations 15378 (State CEQA Guidelines) and therefore CEQA is not applicable. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On September 28, 2010 the Board approved the second reading and adoption of an ordinance amending County Code Section 2.36.040 (Specific Duties Designated) relating to the duties of the Purchasing Agent and adding a new Chapter 2.38 (Informal Bidding Procedures) to Title 2 of the Napa County Code to provide informal bidding procedures under the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (CUPCCAA) (Section 22000, Et Seq. of the Public Contract Code). By adopting the ordinance the Board delegated the authority to award informally bid public works contracts to the Purchasing Agent and Director of Public Works. In the Spring of 2011 the California State Controller advised public agencies of action by the Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission to increase the informal bid limit pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22032 effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011. On October 9, 2011 the Governor signed into law AB 720 which officially amended the statutes to recognize the action by the Commission. The act now provides for the following: Public projects of $45,000 (previously $30,000) or less may be performed by the County's own forces, negotiated contract, or by purchase order (PCC 22032(a)).

Page 2 Public projects of $175,000 (previously $125,000) or less may be let to contract by the informal procedures set forth in the Act (PCC 22032(b)); however if all bids received are in excess of $175,000 (previously $125,000), the Board may, by adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, award the contract, at $187,500 (previously $137,500) or less, to the lowest responsible bidder, if the Board determines the cost estimate was reasonable (PCC 22034(f)). Public projects of more than $175,000 (previously $125,000) shall be let to contract by formal bidding procedures (PCC 22032(c)) except as otherwise provided in PCC 22034(f). Given the efficiencies/benefits realized from the implementation of CUPCCAA staff recommends that the Board approve increasing the authority delegated to Director of Public Works and the Purchasing Agent to match the newly authorized limits described above and make other technical updates to the code to address changes in state law. On April 17, 2012 the Interim Director of Public Works requested and the Board approved for the first reading and intent to adopt an ordinance amending Napa County Code Sections 2.38.010, 2.38.040, and 2.38.050 to Increase the Informal Bidding Thresholds and Contracting Authority of the Purchasing Agent and Director of Public Works under the Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (Section 22000, et seq. of the Public Contract Code). The purpose of this item is for the second reading and adoption of the ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT Is there a Fiscal Impact? No ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The proposed action is not a project as defined by 14 California Code of Regulations 15378 (State CEQA Guidelines) and therefore CEQA is not applicable. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION On September 28, 2010 the Board approved the second reading and adoption of an ordinance amending County Code Section 2.36.040 (Specific Duties Designated) relating to the duties of the Purchasing Agent and by adding a new Chapter 2.38 (Informal Bidding Procedures) to Title 2 of the Napa County Code to provide informal bidding procedures under the California Uniform Public Construction Cost Accounting Act (CUPCCAA) (Section 22000, Et Seq. of the Public Contract Code). By adopting the ordinance the Board delegated the authority to award informal contracts to the Director of Public Works and to the Purchasing Agent. The Act at that time provided for the following alternative bidding procedures: Public projects of $30,000 or less may be performed by negotiated contract or by purchase order (PCC 22032(a)). Public projects of $125,000 or less may be let to contract by the informal procedures set forth in the Act (PCC 22032(b)); however if all bids received are in excess of $125,000, the Board may, by adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, award the contract, at $137,500 or less, to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, if the Board determines the cost estimate was reasonable (PCC 22034(f)). Public projects of more than $125,000 shall be let to contract by formal bidding procedures (PCC 22032(c))

Page 3 except as otherwise provided in PCC 22034(f). A. Benefits of CUPCCAA: As expected, CUPCCAA alternative bidding procedures have saved significant time and money on the delivery of smaller public construction projects. This is due to the fact that: No informal or formal bidding is required for projects costing less than $30,000. Property management staff may deliver through own forces, purchase order or negotiated contract more routine public works projects costing up to $30,000. Plans and specifications are not required for projects costing less than $125,000. No advertisement in newspapers is required for projects costing less than $125,000. Staff time preparing reports to the Board is not required since Board action is not required for projects costing less than $125,000. It is to be noted that the Board may discontinue the County's participation under the CUPCCAA at any time by adopting a resolution stating this fact. A copy of the resolution would then be filed with the Office of the State Controller. B. Implementation of CUPCCAA in Napa County to date: Since the Board approved opting into CUPCCAA in the fall of 2010, the following contracts have been awarded under the provisions of CUPCCAA: 1. Projects under $30,000: Project Contract Amount Contractor and Place of Business Hall of Justice Boiler Replacement (2011) $23,932 Bell Products, Napa Hall of Justice Boiler Replacement (2012) $26,086 Bell Products, Napa Hall of Justice Cooling Tower Repairs $12,597 Bell Products, Napa Greenwood Fire Station Re-carpeting $8,083 Carston Interior Inc., Napa Bella House Gutter Replacement $2,582 Modern Method Roofing, Napa Napa Library Roof Repairs $12,642 Modern Method Roofing, Napa Airport Gas Line Modifications $20,402 Binstock Enterprise, Napa Napa State Hospital M1 & M2 Improvements $23,900 Creative Construction, Napa HHSA Bldg. K Ramp Replacement $15,280 Emil Meyers Construction, Napa TOTAL $145,504 2. Projects greater than $30,000 and less than $125,000: Project Contract Amount Contractor and Place of Business HHSA Clinic Ole $81,999 Griffin Molinari, Napa Hall of Justice Elevator Repairs $84,112.50 Empire Elevator, Petaluma Crawford Facility Investigatory Demolition $46,700 Cal Inc., Vacaville Administration Building Cold Room HVAC Replacement $85,295 American Mechanical, Walnut Creek Animal Shelter Flooring Replacement $45,554 RP Coating, Hayward TOTAL $343,660.50

Page 4 Through the delivery of the above projects under the provisions of CUPCCAA, the following efficiencies/benefits have been realized: Design time and cost savings on those projects where the preparation of plans and specifications was not warranted; Considerable reduction in time required to bid and award a contract; approximately 1-1/2 to 2 months was saved in each case. This is very important for projects that were urgent, such as the Hall of Justice Boiler and Cooling Tower Repairs as well as the Napa State Hospital M1 and M2 Improvements; Cost savings in the bidding of projects since the bidding process for the above projects was much more streamlined. C. Implementation of CUPCCAA in Napa County to date and Local Vendor Preference Policies: As reported to the Board on June 8, 2010 as part of the Local Vendor Preference presentation, CUPCCAA allows for the possibility of local construction firms to be awarded business for the following reasons: 1. Since CUPCCAA allows public projects with an estimated construction cost of $30,000 or less to be performed by negotiated contract or by purchase order, where allowed by law, staff requested quotes from qualified local companies in the immediate area first for these smaller projects. Quotes were only requested from a wider area if qualified local companies were not available or the price quotes from local companies were deemed too high. 2. Under the CUPCCAA, for projects with an estimated construction cost between $30,000 and $125,000, the County establishes an annual list of contractors, identified according to categories of work. In issuing request for informal bids, the County is required to send a request for bid to each listed firm within the category of work needed. The County is also required to notify a mandated list of professional trade journals. Although out-of-county firms need to be given an opportunity to participate, local firms have the assurance of inclusion in the RFP distribution for the category of work they are qualified to perform by virtue of current applicable contractor's license and the bid process is significantly less complex and more cost effective. Stakeholder meetings took place between County staff and local vendors in 2010 to explore ways for improved outreach and participation of local vendors in County projects. Local construction companies participating in the stakeholder meetings indicated that this would be of benefit to them in competing for local projects. D. New CUPCCAA Limits: In the Spring of 2011 the California State Controller advised public agencies of action by the Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission to increase the informal bid limit pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22032 effective for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2011. On October 9, 2011 the Governor signed into law AB 720 which officially amended the statutes to recognize the action by the Commission. The act now provides for the following: Public projects of $45,000 (previously $30,000) or less may be performed by negotiated contract or by purchase order (PCC 22032(a)). Public projects of $175,000 (previously $125,000) or less may be let to contract by the informal procedures set forth in the Act (PCC 22032(b)); however if all bids received are in excess of $175,000 (previously $125,000), the Board may, by adoption of a resolution by a four-fifths vote, award the contract, at $187,500 (previously $137,500) or less, to the lowest responsible bidder, if the Board determines the cost estimate was reasonable (PCC 22034(f)). Public projects of more than $175,000 (previously $125,000) shall be let to contract by formal bidding procedures (PCC 22032(c)) except as otherwise provided in PCC 22034(f).

Page 5 Current CUPCCAA Allowance Under $30,000 May be performed by Force Account, Negotiated Contract or Purchase Order Over $30,000 but less than $125,000 May be let to contract by the informal procedures set forth in the Act Above $125,000 Shall be let to contract by formal bidding procedures New CUPCCAA Allowance Per Commission and AB 720 Under $45,000 May be performed by Force Account, Negotiated Contract or Purchase Order Over $45,000 but less than $175,000 May be let to contract by the informal procedures set forth in the Act Above $175,000 Shall be let to contract by formal bidding procedures Given the efficiencies/benefits realized from the implementation of CUPCCAA staff recommends that the Board approve continued delegation of the authority to execute construction contracts subject to CUPCCAA to the Director of Public Works and the Purchasing Agent within the newly authorized limits described above. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS A. Ordinance - Tracked B. Ordinance - Clean CEO Recommendation: Approve Reviewed By: Molly Rattigan