RESIDENTIAL MARKET STUDY. for the TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS, INC.

Similar documents
RALEIGH-DURHAM MULTIFAMILY Year End 2017

RALEIGH-DURHAM MULTIFAMILY. Multifamily Remains a Smart Play; Triangle Demographics Sustain Demand. Research & Forecast Report.

Housing Needs and Market Assessment

Ann Arbor Downtown Market Scan

Solano County, California

RALEIGH-DURHAM MULTIFAMILY Q Unprecedented Investment Sales Crush All-Time Records in Research & Forecast Report.

RALEIGH-DURHAM MULTIFAMILY MIDYEAR Demand at an All-Time High, Skyrocketing Same-Unit Rents. Research & Forecast Report.

San Jose, California

Allegheny County, Pennsylvania

Centennial, Colorado

NEIGHBORHOOD REPORT. Arvada, Colorado. P r e s e n t e d. b y The Hotz Group REALTOR 773 -

Overall Industrial Market Off to Solid First Quarter; Flex Market Rebounding

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 7.5 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 2,348 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 93 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

The Knox County HOUSING MARKET

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 4.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,404 10, mi. SMALLER THAN 0 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 4.8 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,392 9, mi. SMALLER THAN 53 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 8.2 % MULTI-FAMILY 1,408 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 26 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 4.1 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,308 2, mi. SMALLER THAN 86 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 3.7 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,626 13, mi. LARGER THAN 30 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Year End Deliveries Drive Leasing Activity In the Raleigh-Durham Market

RALEIGH-DURHAM OFFICE Q1 2017

Multifamily Market Analysis

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,200 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 53 % This report provides an in-depth

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 4, Issue 3. THE Introduction SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 3.0 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 1,208 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 42 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 6.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 14 %

2015 Housing Report. kelowna.ca. April Water Street Kelowna, BC V1Y 1J4 TEL FAX

WAKE UNION PLACE WAKE FOREST, NORTH CAROLINA LAND FOR SALE ±65.43 ACRES SITE WAKE FOREST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH. Smithfield s CHICKEN N BAR-B-Q

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,440 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 11 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2018 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

REGIONAL. Rental Housing in San Joaquin County

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2017 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 5 Issue 2 SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY. Key Findings, 2 nd Quarter, 2015

Monthly Indicators % - 0.2% - 9.5% Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2017 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

Modeling Housing Affordability in Corpus Christi, Texas

Housing and Mortgage Market Update

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 6.8 % SINGLE-FAMILY 2,122 8, mi. LARGER THAN 74 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 6.5 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,555 NOT FOUND mi. LARGER THAN 71 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 2, % 3.7 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,260 8, mi. SMALLER THAN 32 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 14.2 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,748 11, mi. LARGER THAN 22 %

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 5.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 3, mi. SMALLER THAN 80 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 10, mi. SMALLER THAN 18 % This report provides an in-depth

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 3.9 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,088 NOT FOUND mi. SMALLER THAN 37 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

RENTAL PROPERTY $ 1, % 7.6 % MULTI-FAMILY 1,202 43, mi. SMALLER THAN 16 % This report provides an in-depth

State of the Nation s Housing 2008: A Preview

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2017 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

San Diego County Vol. XX, Issue I Rental Trends Executive Summary March 2007

Massachusetts 2016 First Quarter Housing Report

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 10.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY NOT FOUND 1,448 87, mi. LARGER THAN 15 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Ontario Rental Market Study Results: Measuring the Supply Gap / Renovation Investment and the Role of Vacancy Decontrol

APARTMENT MARKET TRENDS

RENTAL PROPERTY $ % 10.4 % SINGLE-FAMILY 1,300 12, mi. SMALLER THAN 65 % This report provides an in-depth comparison of

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development.

Quick Facts. For Week Ending July 14, 2018 Publish Date: July 23, 2018 All comparisons are to % - 2.7% - 14.

Monthly Indicators - 8.0% + 4.2% - 3.4% Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

RALEIGH-DURHAM OFFICE

Section 1 - Current Metro Rent Details. Asking Rent by Age Asking Rent Distribution Asking Rent Growth Rate Distribution $788 $859 $860 $931

Little Haiti Community Needs Assessment: Housing Market Analysis December 2015

Quick Facts. For Week Ending July 14, 2018 Data current as of July 23, % + 9.2% % Metrics by Week

Affordable Rental Housing in Chapel Hill Challenges and Opportunities. Presented to Mayor s Affordable Housing Task Force June 6, 2013

Wake County North Carolina

Monthly Indicators - 4.9% - 0.7% % Market Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

Weekly Market Activity Report

Lied Institute Report on Apartment Market Trends featuring data from the Center for Business and Economic Research

CBER-LIED Report on Housing Market Conditions

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Brenda Morton Dulles Area Association of REALTORS

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 3, Issue 3 SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY. Introduction

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

Monthly Indicators + 3.5% + 2.1% - 9.4% Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

Congressional District Report for the 115th Congress

Monthly Market Data Report

Demographic and Housing Trends

November 2017 Loudoun County Market Trends Report Inventory decline persists as total and new listings are down; Sales growth continues to drop

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

PEACHTREE INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD small area study

Miami Beach, FL 33141

Monthly Indicators - 7.4% + 5.6% % Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

Monthly Indicators - 1.1% - 2.8% % Market Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

Housing Market Update

Housing Indicators in Tennessee

REALTOR.COM MARKET OUTLOOK

MARKET AREA UPDATE Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

MARKET OUTLOOK FOR SAN MATEO

Affordable Housing in the Triangle: A Primer. Ken Bowers, AICP

Affordable Housing Gap and Economic Analysis

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

Monthly Market Data Report

Monthly Indicators + 3.3% + 1.9% % Market Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

May 2018 Loudoun County Market Trends Report Tight inventory continues while price growth stagnates; Condo sales hit a record high.

A STUDY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA S APARTMENT RENTAL MARKET 2000 TO 2015: THE ROLE OF MILLENNIALS

Moorestown, NJ 08057

Pikes Peak area housing Market Statistics (As of: 2/28/2018)

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2018 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

For personal use only

MARKET WATCH: Dakota County

Transcription:

RESIDENTIAL MARKET STUDY for the TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL PREPARED BY DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS, INC. JANUARY 2010

1 Chapel Hill Housing Trends 2 Housing Demand 3 Housing Affordability i AGENDA

just the facts, ma am Sources of Data U.S. Census American Community Survey (U.S. Census) ESRI Business Analyst Town of Chapel Hill Orange County Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Bureau of Labor Statistics Moody s Analytics Ribbon Demographics / Nielson Claritas Triangle Multiple List Serve New Residential Construction Index (U.S. Census) Chapel Hill - Carrboro Community Home Trust State of North Carolina ii PURPOSE & METHODOLOGY

Section 1 HOUSING TRENDS

The local economy is predicted to continue to be strong... RELATIVE EMPLOYMENT PERFORMANCE (1995=100) Durham-Chapel Hill MSA vs. U.S. 1995-2014 135 130 125 120 115 110 105 100 95 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10F 11F 12F 13F 14F DataBuffet MSA code: MDUR Source: Moody s Analytics U.S. DUR 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 INDICATORS 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 19.6 19.5 21.2 25.1 27.7 27.3 26.6 Gross Metro Product 27.7 28.8 30.0 30.9 31.8 259.5 263.8 268.8 278.8 286.9 290.9 283.9 Total Employment 282.3 286.3 294.7 302.3 307.5 5.4 4.4 4.3 3.9 3.9 4.8 7.8 Unemployment Rate 8.0 7.2 5.3 4.9 4.6 1 HOUSING TRENDS

... helping to drive future population growth POPULATION PROJECTIONS Chapel Hill Housing Market Area (HMA) 650000 600000 PAST GROWTH 2000-2009 PROJECTIONS 2010-2030 550000 500000 450000 400000 350000 300000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Source: North Carolina Office of Budget and Management 1 HOUSING TRENDS

Housing was overbuilt throughout the region, but not in Chapel Hill 20,160 households were added to the Chapel Hill HMA (Durham, Orange, Chatham counties) between 2000-2008, broadly representing total new housing demand. 37,744 housing units were built or permitted during that same period. Housing demand in Orange County was 3,500 households compared to the construction of 8,460 housing units. Geography Demand Supply Change Chapel HIll HMA 20,160 37,744 17,584 Orange County 3,506 8,459 4,953 Chapel Hill 3,671 3,190 (481) Chapel Hill experienced housing demand for 2,800-4,500, and added 3,190 housing units. 1 HOUSING TRENDS

For-sale housing saw drastic rises in price during the past decade, particularly in Chapel Hill MEDIAN ANNUAL HOME SALES ALL HOUSING TYPES (2000-midyear 2010) Source: Triangle Multiple List Serve $350,000 $300,000 $298,231 $323,300 32% $269,960 36% $250,000 $244,200 $200,000 $150,000 $198,200 $159,000 $187,662 $169,500 $185,000 $164,000 16% 18% $138,750 $100,000 $50,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Chapel Hill Durham Raleigh Cary 1 HOUSING TRENDS

Chapel Hill experienced a particularly notable rise in single family home prices $450,000 MEDIAN ANNUAL HOME SALES SINGLE FAMILY HOMES (2000-midyear 2010) $425,000 $400,000 $350,000 48% $341,000 $390,000 $300,000 $287,000 55% $315,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $219,500 $170,000 $143,500 $220,000 29% $177,000 23% $214,500 $175,133 $100,000 $50,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Chapel Hill Durham Raleigh Cary 1 HOUSING TRENDS

Not all Chapel Hill Homes are equal in value AVERAGE SALE PRICE OF HOMES BY DECADE Chapel Hill, NC $900,000 $800,000 $700,000 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $- Time Period Homes Sold Average Sales Price 2000-2010 3,206 $458,445 1990-1999 2,336 $379,900 1980-1989 2,185 $243,745 1970-1979 1,224 $235,673 1960-1969 950 $247,922 1950-1959 376 $278,983 1940-1949 128 $295,852 1930-1939 74 $510,822 1920-1929 111 $485,573 1910-1919 13 $603,723 1900-1909 9 $735,667 1800 s 16 $817,094 Source: Triangle Multiple List Serve 1 HOUSING TRENDS

Section 2 HOUSING DEMAND

Housing Demand vs. Supply 2000-2008 Durham County Orange County Chatham County Chapel Hill HMA Town of Chapel Hill Low Middle High 1 Households 2000 89,015 45,863 19,741 154,619 17,808 2 Households 2008 102,616 49,369 22,794 174,779 20,626 21,479 22,332 3 Total Housing Demand 2000-2008 13,604 3,506 3,053 20,160 2,818 3,671 4,524 4 Housing Units 2000 95,452 49,289 21,358 166,099 18,976 5 New Housing Units 2000-2008 24,070 8,459 5,215 37,744 3,190 6 Total Housing Units 2008 119,522 57,748 26,573 203,843 22,166 7 Removals (0.05%) 598 289 133 1,019 111 8 Adjusted Housing Units 2008 118,924 57,459 26,440 202,824 22,055 9 Over / Undersupply 10,469 4,953 2,162 17,584 372 (481) (1,334) 10 Vacant Units 16,308 8,090 3,646 28,045 1,429 576 (276) 11 % Vacancy 13.7% 14.1% 13.8% 13.8% 6.5% 2.6% (1.3%) 12 Less Vacancy Buffer (5%) 8.7% 9.1% 8.8% 8.8% 1.5% (2.4%) (6.3%) 13 Adjusted Housing Oversupply 10,362 5,217 2,324 17,904 326 (527) (1,380) 14 Avg. Annual Household Growth 1,511 390 339 2,240 313 408 503 15 Years to Absorb Oversupply 6.86 13.39 6.85 7.99 1.04 (1.29) (2.74) 2 HOUSING DEMAND

Demand Projections Durham County Orange County Chatham County Chapel Hill HMA Town of Chapel Hill Low Middle High 1 Population 2008 263,048 126,985 63,373 453,406 54,972 2 Population Projection 2015 326,073 141,560 69,434 537,067 57,473 3 Population Projection 2020 336,970 148,559 75,263 561,092 60,437 4 Average Household Size 2008 2.56 2.57 2.78 2.59 2.56 6 Estimated Households 2015 127,202 55,035 24,974 207,212 22,456 7 Household Change 2008-2015 24,586 5,666 2,180 32,433 977 8 % Household Change 2008-2015 24% 11% 10% 19% 5% 9 Total Housing Demand 2008-2015 (Adjusted for Oversupply) 14,224 449 (144) 14,529 651 1,504 2,357 10 Average Permits Per Year 2,032 64 (21) 2,076 93 215 337 11 Estimated Households 2020 131,453 57,873 27,071 216,397 23,614 13 Household Change 2008-2020 28,837 8,504 4,277 41,618 2,135 14 % Household Change 2008-2020 28% 17% 19% 24% 10% 15 Total Housing Demand 2008-2020 (Adjusted for Oversupply) 18,475 3,287 1,952 23,714 1,809 2,662 3,515 16 Average Permits Per Year 1,540 274 163 1,976 151 222 293 2 HOUSING DEMAND

Section 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Housing Affordability Income Ranges for Chapel Hill HMA 8.7% 5.4% 10.5% 10.7% 13.9% 17.8% 11.5% 21.6% Single Family Townhome Condo Home Trust Apartment (Studio / 1 BD) Apartment (2, 3 BD) Public Housing Median Family Income - Chapel Hill $0-$10,000 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000 $90,000 $100,000 $110,000 80% of AMI - Orange County Area Median Income - Orange County Median Household Income - Chapel Hill Entry-Level / Starter Unit, Older Unit, or Both Majority of Existing Housing Stock High End, Larger Size, Choice Neighborhoods 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Four factors that appear to contribute to the high prices in Chapel Hill Taxes Land Costs Home Size / Construction Costs Housing Demand 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Taxes Tax Chapel Hill Durham Raleigh Cary Local Tax 0.494 0.545 0.3735 0.33 County Tax 0.858 0.6911 0.534 0.534 Fire Tax 0.05 0.08 0.08 School District Tax 0.1884 Capital Tax 0.0619 TOTAL 1.54* 1.35 0.99 0.94 Source: Orange, Durham and Wake Counties Chapel Hill Durham Raleigh Cary 1 Price of Home (= to Assessment) $225,000 2 Interest 5% 3 Months 360 4 Monthly Payments $966.28 5 Tax Rate 1.54% 1.35% 0.99% 0.94% 6 Annual Taxes $3,465 $3,038 $2,228 $2,115 7 Monthly Taxes $289 $253 $186 $176 8 Monthly Payment (Before Insurance) $1,255.03 $1,219.40 $1,151.90 $1,142.53 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Construction Cost / Home Size $300,000 $250,000 $200,000 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 $- Chapel Hill Durham Raleigh Cary Differences primarily due to average home size For example, avg. home sold in Chapel Hill 2000-10 was 2,678 sq. ft. vs. 2,154 in Raleigh Single Family Two Family Three and Four Family Five or More Family Source: New Residential Construction Index 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Land Cost $175,067 $99,714 $98,662 Analysis of improved land sale in Chapel Hill 2000-2010 $49,736 Chapel Hill Raleigh Durham Cary 0-2 Acres Source: Triangle Multiple List Serve (MLS) 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Chapel Hill Durham Raleigh Cary 1 Size of Parcel 0.63 acres 2 Cost of Land & Infrastructure (per acre) $175,067 $49,736 $99,714 $98,662 3 Land / Infrastructure Cost $110,292 $31,334 $62,820 $62,157 4 Size of Unit (Avg. for Community) 2,680 1,866 2,150 2,600 5 Construction Cost Per Unit $77.87 $90.15 $70.39 $76.63 6 Total Construction Cost $208,692 $168,220 $151,339 $199,238 7 Cost of Marketing & Other Soft Costs (5%) $15,949 $9,978 $10,708 $13,070 8 Price of Home $334,933 $209,531 $224,866 $274,465 9 Loan Payment (20% Down payment) $267,946 $167,625 $179,893 $219,571 10 Interest 5% 11 Months 360 12 Monthly Payments $1,438.40 $899.85 $965.70 $1,178.71 13 Tax Rate 1.54% 1.35% 0.99% 0.94% 14 Annual Taxes $5,158 $2,829 $2,226 $2,580 15 Monthly Taxes $430 $236 $186 $215 16 Monthly Payment (Before Insurance) $1,868.22 $1,135.57 $1,151.22 $1,393.71 17 Durham 64.52% 18 % Higher Monthly Payment than Raleigh 62.28% 19 Cary 34.05% 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Other Factors Housing Demand / General Appeal of Community Limited Supply High sales of new construction vs. old Limited turn-over of older, more modestly priced real estate School District 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Affordability of For-Sale Homes 2 Person Household 3 Person Household 4 Person Household 80% 100% 125% 150% 175% 1 Annual Income $45,650 $57,063 $71,329 $85,595 $99,860 2 Monthly Housing Expense (30% of Income) $1,141 $1,427 $1,783 $2,140 $2,497 3 Single Family Affordability Gap ($1,209) ($923) ($567) ($210) $147 4 Condominium Affordability Gap $41 $327 $683 $1,040 $1,397 5 Townhome Affordability Gap ($584) ($298) $58 $415 $772 6 Annual Income $51,350 $64,188 $80,234 $96,281 $112,328 7 Monthly Housing Expense (30% of Income) $1,284 $1,605 $2,006 $2,407 $2,808 8 Single Family Affordability Gap ($1,066) ($754) ($344) $57 $458 9 Condominium Affordability Gap $184 $505 $906 $1,307 $1,708 10 Townhome Affordability Gap ($441) ($120) $281 $682 $1,083 11 Annual Income $57,050 $71,313 $89,141 $106,969 $124,797 12 Monthly Housing Expense (30% of Income) $1,426 $1,783 $2,229 $2,674 $3,120 13 Single Family Affordability Gap ($924) ($567) ($121) $324 $770 14 Condominium Affordability Gap $326 $683 $1,129 $1,574 $2,020 15 Townhome Affordability Gap ($299) $58 $504 $949 $1,395 Source: HUD, Triangle MLS, DCI Analysis 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Rental Affordability - Worse Than For-Sale Housing? RENTER OCCUPIED COSTS AS PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME Chapel Hill, NC 9% OWNER OCCUPIED COSTS AS PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME Chapel Hill, NC 16% 10% 9% 42% 53% 11% 8% 16% 10% 17% Less than 15% 15.0 to 19.9 percent 20.0 to 24.9 percent 25.0 to 29.9 percent 30.0 to 34.9 percent 35.0 percent or more Less than 20.0 percent 20.0 to 24.9 percent 25.0 to 29.9 percent 30.0 to 34.9 percent 35.0 percent or more Source: American Community Survey (ACS) 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Distribution of Rents DISTRIBUTION OF 1 BEDROOM RENTS Selected Chapel Hill Apartment Complexes DISTRIBUTION OF 2 BEDROOM RENTS Selected Chapel Hill Apartment Complexes $1,400 $1,800 $1,300 $1,200 $1,100 Estimated Average 1 Bed Rent ($772) $1,600 $1,400 Estimated Average 2 Bed Rent ($926) $1,000 $1,200 $900 $800 $1,000 $700 $800 $600 $500 $400 Cosgrove Hill Apts at Meadowmont Notting Hill Southern Village The Pointe at Chapel Hill Sunstone Glen Lennox Northampton Pl Timber Hollow Foxcroft Franklin Woods Laurel Ridge Timberlyne Vlg Sagebrook Shadowood Colony Kingswood $600 $400 Cosgrove Hill Notting Hill Apartments at Meadowmont Southern Village Apartments The Pointe at Chapel Hill Laurel Ridge Glen Lennox Cottages Sunstone Foxcroft Timber Hollow Sagebrook Pinegate Apartments Shadowood Franklin Woods Apartments Timberlyne Village Colony Apartments Booker Creek Apartments Kingswood Apartments Kings Arms Source: Composite Websites (apartments.com, apartment guide, forrent.com) 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

Issues with Rental Affordability Data collection for rental units leaves more questions than in for-sale analysis What is the true occupancy / impact of students? What are available rents of non-complex units? What is the true supply of households with affordable housing needs? Some findings Newer apartment buildings have the highest rents. Older apartment buildings carry lowest rents (impact on quality). Despite having a higher percentage of rental units vs. owner occupied, the Town built many more for-sale units (~90% vs. 10%) over the past decade. Retaining affordable units while redeveloping older areas (Colony Apts, Glen Lennox) will be an important issue. 3 HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

RESIDENTIAL MARKET STUDY for the TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL QUESTIONS