FARMERS MARKET OF ANN ARBOR A UNIQUE HERITAGE

Similar documents
Request for Proposal Commercial Real Estate Brokerage Services

Chapter 22 Historic Preservation/Design Review

MIDWAY CITY Municipal Code

CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF HANOVER, N.H.

City of Lafayette Staff Report Planning Commission

PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY. September 10, 2013 [ ] Consent [X] Regular [ ] Ordinance [ ] Public Hearing

RECITALS STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT. Draft: November 30, 2018


BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS FOR MARION COUNTY, OREGON RESOLUTION NO. This matter came before the Marion County Board of

SAN FRANCISCO PARKING AUTHORITY COMMISSION

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

Fwd: Hal and Jo Feeney letter of August 15, 2016 Regarding Mora Glen Drive No.1 Annexation Attachments: Letter to LAH pdf

Intent: To establish a policy and guidelines for all procurement activities in the city. SECTION I: Purpose of Purchasing Policies...

Ann Arbor Downtown Premium Prioritization

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

CAPITAL ASSET POLICY

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12)

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing

Chapter 11. Competitive Negotiation: Procedure

We, the May 2012 Grand Jury, heard 222 indictments and returned 222 true bills and 0 no bills.

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

Town of Ontario Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes September 13, 2017

IFRS INTERPRETATIONS COMMITTEE - AGENDA DECISIONS (JANUARY AND MARCH 2018)

Los Angeles Department of City Planning RECOMMENDATION REPORT

LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO

Board of County Commissioners

APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING COUNTY FINANCES

Feasibility Study Report for the establishment of a rural community for Campobello Island.

FULL TEXT OF MEASURE I CITY OF YORBA LINDA

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Status of Affordable Housing Litigation as of December 31, 2018

Institutional Analysis of Condominium Management System in Amhara Region: the Case of Bahir Dar City

SoccerCity Versus Friends of SDSU: An Analysis of Two Competing Initiatives

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF COLD SPRING ORDINANCE NO. 304

CITY COUNCIL TRANSMITTAL

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A NEW COUNCIL POLICY No ENTITLED SURPLUS SALES

REPORT OF THE CHIEF LEGISLATIVE ANALYST

MARKET VALUE BASIS OF VALUATION

ARTICLE 9 - ACCESSORY AND TEMPORARY USES AND STRUCTURES

AN ACT RELATING TO REAL ESTATE DEEDS OF TRUST; DESIGNATING PRIORITY AND TIME PERIODS FOR REDEMPTION RIGHTS AFTER JUDICIAL

Seth Mallen, Vice President Maximus Real Estate Partners 525 Florida Street, Ste. 150 San Francisco, CA November 10, 2015

TOWN OF CUTLER BAY 4. PUBLIC HEARING: MOTION RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF THE FOLLOWING ORDINANCE:

Right of Way Vacation

NOTICE OF INTENT. The Council of the Town of Silver City, Grant County, New Mexico

Operating Plan Military Avenue Business Association BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO OPERATING PLAN. Page 1 11

IC Chapter 10. Leasing and Lease-Purchasing Structures

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Policy Agenda Number: 60.

September/October Oliver S. Zeltner. Section 552(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that if a creditor prior to bankruptcy obtained

Thank you for the opportunity to assist with your pre-purchase contract report.

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement

ZOCO CHAIRMAN S PROPOSED DISCUSSION ISSUES PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ON SIGNS (SECTION 34)

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

Conomo Point A Bulletized Overview

Urban Planning and Land Use

INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN LAKE COUNTY AND THE LAKE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR FOR THE GREATER GROVES MUNICIPAL SERVICE BENEFIT UNIT

Do You See What I See? Most Likely Not! Visibility Covenants in Commercial Leases

Independent Auditor s Report on Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures for the Patriot s Crossing Development

General Manager, Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

Real Estate Institute of Tasmania Assignment Cover Sheet

TOWN OF MANSFIELD RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE EXTENSION OF PUBLIC SEWERS

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 17, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

Funding Public Capital Projects

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability, in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

ASSESSORS ANSWER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REAL PROPERTY Assessors Office, 37 Main Street

Amending Chapter 9 Establishment of Fees, Section 9.04 Ambulance Service Fees. (Second Reading)

Subject. Date: 2016/10/25. Originator s file: CD.06.AFF. Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 11, Conditional use permit for CrossFit Gym at 2806 Hedberg Drive

SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

Okaloosa County BCC. Okaloosa County BCC. MSBU / MSTU Policy. Municipal Service Benefit Units Municipal Service Taxing Units.

The President is authorized to delegate this authority to the Vice President for Administration and Treasurer.

Mr. Don Horn, Chairperson, Miami-Dade Housing Finance Authority Board Ms. Patricia J. Braynon, Director, Miami-Dade Housing Finance Authority

PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR EXPENDITURE OF REVENUE; PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT

SPECIAL EXCEPTION APPLICATION LEVY COUNTY, FLORIDA

Request for Expansion of Target Investment Zone Boundaries in Hagerstown December 7, 2006

ORDINANCE NO. CID-3087

SPECIAL SERVICE AREA GUIDE

MINUTES of a Regular Meeting of the MUNICIPAL PLANNING COMMISSION held on Tuesday, January 5, 2010 at 3:00 p.m. with the following in attendance:

AGREEMENT FOR THE GIFT OF REAL PROPERTY. This AGREEMENT TO GIFT ( Agreement ), is made and entered into this day of

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA. O Kji ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR ARTS DISTRICT LOS ANGELES BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (PROPERTY BASED)

NARRATIVE (GUIDELINES)

ORDINANCE NO. 14 ST. JOSEPH COUNTY ADDRESS ORDINANCE DATE 1997 AMENDED NOVEMBER 15, 2005

So you d like to purchase Municipal Tax-foreclosed properties

GUIDE TO THE CITY OF ANN ARBOR ANNEXATION PROCESS

CITY OF VALDEZ APPLICATION FOR SUBDIVISION

DATE: June 25, 2014 TO:

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 13-REZ-13 An Zou Property Town Council Meeting November 21, 2013

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

AN ACT RELATING TO PROPERTY; LIMITING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN PUBLIC

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

Park County Animal Shelter Gift Acceptance Policy Adopted 3/16/2017

Monthly Board of Directors Meeting January 10, 2012

Subpart A - GENERAL ORDINANCES Chapter 66 - TAXATION ARTICLE V. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION

County of Santa Clara Board of Supervisors Supervisorial District Two Supervisor George Shirakawa

Applicant Address: 3325 Longview Drive, St 311. State/Zip: Ca/ Phone: (916)

Transcription:

TO: THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF ANN ARBOR October 11, 2004 FARMERS MARKET OF ANN ARBOR A UNIQUE HERITAGE IN HONOR OF GOTTLOB LUICK 1899 MAYOR 1901 FOR HIS LIBERAL FIANANCIAL AID IN SECURING THIS PUBLIC MARKET FOR THE CITY OF ANN ARBOR These are the words which the City Council in 1931 authorized to be placed on a bronze plaque at the Farmers Market in recognition of the contribution of those who made the Farmers Market a reality. This market is part of the culture and heritage of the City of Ann Arbor. Now, the City Council is being called upon to affirm its commitment to the tradition and character of the Farmers Market. I. The Background: Historically, the Farmers Market originated in the years following World War I when local farmers displayed their produce for sale along the streets bordering the Washtenaw County Courthouse. In 1921 the city took over operation of the market. License fees charged to the farmers were modest but by 1928, the Market Fund had accumulated just under $9,000 1. Consideration of obtaining a dedicated site for the market arose during 1 City Council meetings in the spring of 1929. Three unsolicited proposals to sell land to the city for market sites had been received. Simultaneously, a petition filed by more than 125 citizens protested against purchase of a market site at that time. In a wise action, Council moved to postpone all discussion until a later date. In the fall of 1930, Council approved expansion of the market to additional streets adjacent to the courthouse 2. Further expansion was approved in the spring of 1931 3.

By that time the Market Fund exceeded $12,000. In March of 1931, Council minutes record the City Engineer be authorized and instructed to secure options on suitable market sites and that said sites to be approved by the Market Site Committee which 4 consisted of three appointed council members. On June 1 st, 1931 the Council accepted the report of the Site Committee and moved that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized and empowered to execute a land contract with Gottlob Luick and other members of the Luick family for purchase of land to be 5 used as a market site. The timing was not optimal, as the Great Depression was at its peak and discretionary money in short supply for all. Details of the negotiations are not recorded but several background facts are known. The land cited had been a large lumbar yard owned by members of the Luick family but Gottlob had not been the primary operator of the business. The ultimate decision reached by those owning the property was to sell to the city for less than fair market value for a price of $21,000 with $10,000 at closing and remainder by land contract. This price below fair market value was acknowledged in the contract as well as the role of Gottlob Luick in the transactions: It is further understood and agreed that in establishing a purchase price of $21,000.00 on the above described property, Gottlob Luick and others made a substantial contribution to the City of Ann Arbor, and, in return the City of Ann Arbor thereby agrees to erect a suitable memorial in the form of a brass plaque in Honor of Gottlob Luick at its earliest convenience on said above described 6 property In October 1931 by Common Council resolution, the Farmers Market moved to the former lumbar yard site, using the existing sheds as sale stalls 7. The move proved to be highly successful. In 1936 the Finance Committee recommended that the City pay off the land contract by a loan from the Insurance Fund to the Market Fund 8. Minutes record that this left the Market Fund with $359.88 in its account.

The potential to gain funds for city projects from the federal Works Project Administration resulted in construction of the present day sheds and stalls of the market in 1938-40. Of note, the city s share of $10,824.90 came from a bond issue to be paid 9 over ten years. This was paid annually from the Market Fund. This same fund paid for the present market office building in 1984. II. The Present and Beyond: Council minutes through the years document continued interest in the Farmers Market and its welfare. Now, the future of the Market is at a crossroads. In assessing possible decisions which can be made by City Council, it is important to appraise exactly what the City of Ann Arbor and its citizens have in the Farmers Market today. The City of Ann Arbor is one of the few in the area to have a permanent site with structures built specifically to serve a market function. This is a major attraction for vendors. As a consequence, the people of Ann Arbor have a larger number of vendors providing a wider variety of products than available in neighboring markets. This market is also unique in comparison to many in the requirement that all items are grown or personally crafted by the vendors. This is an immutable policy for all. Overall, the large number of vendors offering competing products works to maintain quality at the highest level and affords customers multiple options in their purchase. However, the number of vendors exceed the presently available stalls and some by necessity set up on the adjoining sidewalks. Market days are Wednesdays and Saturdays, with artisans also offering craft items for sale on Sundays. The large crowds attending the markets attest to the attraction to the people of Ann Arbor of the fresh produce, flowers, and craft items offered for sale It is one of the few settings in which fresh products are sold by the farmers that produce them. For most children, and many adults as well, it is their only opportunity to see and talk with real farmers and see them set up and sell their products. Of note is that the presence of the Farmers Market is one of the pluses used in recruiting personnel additions to local businesses and the University. The Farmers Market remains a tangible reminder of the agrarian society that dominated the economy of early America, including Ann Arbor and the surrounding Washtenaw County. The importance of preserving farming and its associated green

belt has resulted in bond support by citizens of Ann Arbor in recent balloting. Knowledge of the quality of the products offered by vendors in the Ann Arbor Farmers Market extends nationally. Several years ago a national food and health magazine ( EATING WELL ) devoted one issue to eating well in America (July- 10 August 1994). The editors sought outstanding farmers markets from throughout the states of the northeast Atlantic seaboard to those bordering on the Mississippi River. The Ann Arbor Farmers Market was one of the nine city markets featured. The quality of the locally grown foods offered for sale at each of the chosen markets was the highlight of the article. An additional notable commentary within the article recognized the underlying support given to establishing and maintaining these markets by local governments a key element in their continued success From the fiscal viewpoint, the Farmers Market has been self-sustaining financially throughout its existence. Revenues generated by rental fees to vendors have covered all capital and operating costs. These include the payments on the original land contract to secure the market site property, the City s share of the WPA project to construct the present market sheds and stalls, the market office building and, more recently, the costs of the consultants related to renovation. Currently, some of the parking meter monies generated on non-market days are also transferred to the Market Fund.. The point for major decisions to be made for the future of the Farmers Market resulted from removal of the last house on the site. This cleared the way for realistic consideration of possible change and renovation. For that purpose the consulting firm, Johnson Hill Land Ethics Studio, was employed. Members of the firm sought input from a number of groups and developed a proposal for a phased renovation. The plan included a new configuration for pedestrians and vehicles plus new construction for activities unassociated with market functions. The response of vendors and patrons was generally negative but was not formalized. At that point, a group of interested citizens and vendors made a formal survey of all vendors 11,12. In brief, responses of vendors representing 85% of the stalls in the market and the majority of those without assigned stalls were definitely unfavorable to the recommendations of the consultants. Instead, a great

majority believe the addition of more stalls to be the first priority of need and that by extension of the row of stalls on the south wing beyond the office and of those of the middle row to be the optimal plan. It would also be the least expensive to construct. The proposals by the consultants to construct a grass/park area and a three-story artisans building on the market site were considered to be highly undesirable. It was the firm conviction of the vendors that only those changes to improve function as a farmers market should be made and those modifications associated with using the site for other non-market activities should be emphatically rejected. A petition which was signed by over 750 customers of the Farmers Market supporting the changes proposed by the 13 vendors has been presented to the Parks Advisory Committee. The fate of the Farmers Market is at a critical crossroad. The basic issue is whether the site which was dedicated to serve solely as a farmers market continues its unique and highly successful service to vendors and customers alike or is developed into a hybrid attempting to retain some features of its present physical structure and function while offering a setting for potential future venues. These, however, may never materialize as the market site is ill-suited for such activities and a poor replica of numerous facilities already existing under the Park and Recreation Department and other entities in the city. The expression of the need to construct green spaces within the site of the market represents a costly and wasteful duplication of existing park areas. North Main Park is within two blocks of the market and Wheeler Park a short distance further north. Within the Ann Arbor area, the City Guide for 2004-2005 lists over 150 parks and nature areas. There is only one Farmers Market. In conclusion, the City Council is requested to affirm the City s long standing commitment to the Farmers Market by establishing clear guidelines which state that the purpose and function of the site shall first and foremost be a farmers market, the character of which shall be maintained as part of the history and heritage of this great City. Respectfully submitted, William J. Oliver, M.D.

mailwjoandmbo@aol.com 2892 Bay Ridge Ann Arbor, MI 481003 (734)761-5169 e- REFERENCES FOR FARMERS MARKET LETTER TO MAYOR / CITY COUNCIL 1. Common Council minutes: April 22, 1929. 2. Common Council minutes: September, 1930. 3. Common Council minutes: March 5, 1931. 4. Common Council minutes: March 16, 1931. 5. Common Council minutes: June 1, 1931. 6. Land Contract between Gottlob Luick and other members of the Luick family with the City of Ann Arbor: June 2, 1931. 7. Common Council minutes: October 5, 1931. 8. Common Council minutes: October 5, 1936. 9. Common Council minutes: October 3, 1938. 10. Jenkins NH: To Market, To Market. EATING WELL: The Magazine of Food and Health: July-August, 1994. 11. Survey of Farmers Market Vendors Vendors Assigned Stalls Annually: August 7, 2004. 12. Survey of Farmers Market Vendors Vendors Not Assigned Stalls Annually: August 7, 2004. 13. Petition of Market Customers previously sent to Market Commission, Parks Advisory Committee, September, 2004. Cc: Ms. Karla Henderson, Parks Advisory Committee, Market Commission. ******************