Drainage Maintenance Policy

Similar documents
PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK CITY OF TOWN AND COUNTRY STORMWATER PROGRAM

Dedicated program for municipal drainage management

Frequently Asked Questions for: Drainage, Watershed and Water Quality Property Owners Near Creeks Developers and Engineers and Definitions of Terms

Lilly Creek Improvement Project

MANDATORY HOA DISCLOSURE SUMMARY FOR LONE STAR RANCH SINGLE FAMILY HOMES

SPEAR S RANCH ON SALADO CREEK ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE IMPROVEMENT GUIDELINES

Appendix A Orleans County Local Law Assessment

NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY N NIMBY! NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY

SECTION A-1500 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION A-1600

CHECKLIST FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

Appendix A: Submittal Checklists

2012 COMMUNITY INFORMATION

CONYERS, GEORGIA. Whereas, stormwater problems on private property may pose a threat to public safety, health, or welfare; and

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND FACILITIES

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

Section 6 Easements and Rights-of-Way

Chapter Plat Design (LMC)

CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION Meeting with Staff Commercial Projects

City of Cedar Hill Gated Community, Private Street Development Guide

Preliminary Subdivision Application (Minor) (Three (3) lots or less)

Chapter 5. Floodplain Management. 5.0 Introduction. 5.1 Floodplain Management and Regulation

BACKGROUND There are 23 flood control structures in the Upper Brushy Creek Water Control and Improvement District (District). See attached map.

Preliminary Subdivision Application (Major) (Four (4) lots or more)

Appendix A Reproducible Forms

ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS FOR SMALL LOT SUBDIVISION (WINDERMERE, PHASE G, SECTION ONE) Article One DEFINITIONS (Windermere, Phase G, Section One)

TOWN OF LAKE LURE LAND DISTURBANCE PERMIT (LESS THAN 1 ACRE) Permit Fee Permit No. LDP- (see Fee Schedule below) Approved:

Zoning Permit Application Cover Page

Chapter 5. Floodplain Management. 5.0 Introduction. 5.1 Douglas County Comprehensive Master Plan. 5.2 Floodplain Management and Regulation

Township of Collier 2418 Hilltop Road Presto, PA 15142

610 LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENTS OUTSIDE A UGB

City of Melissa, Texas Plat Dedication Language

Citizens Advisory Committee 5/16/2013 6:00 p.m.

WASHINGTON COUNTY CUP SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT AND DECLARATION OF EASEMENT

WASCO COUNTY PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPLICATION

SITE. Sheet Index. Legal Description. General Notes: Vicinity Map Scale 1" = 600'

REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

SECTION 4: PRELIMINARY PLAT

Post Construction Stakeholder Involvement Charles Brown Town of Cary. TOWN Of CARY

Flood Hazard Area Control Act Rules

BRIDGETON SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CHECKLIST

PLANNING BOARD CITY OF CONCORD, NH MINOR SUBDIVISION CHECKLIST

LYON COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

PRELIMINARY PLAT CHECK LIST

SUBDIVISION & PLANNING APPROVAL STAFF REPORT Date: December 1, 2016

PRE CONSTRUCTION CHECK LIST FOR BUILDING PERMITS

BASICS OF FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT & PLANNING IN NEW JERSEY

FINAL SUBDIVISION AND LAND DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST. Plan Name. Applicant's Name:

CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE HOUSE

AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH REGULATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTROLLING AND MANAGING STORM WATER RUNOFF

géãç Éy VtÇtÇwt zât 5440 Routes 5 & 20 West Canandaigua, NY Phone: (585) / Fax: (585)

ORDINANCE CITY OF DUNDAS RICE COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA

REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

City of Leavenworth DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MAJOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION 1

SKOKOMISH PUBLIC SEWER CONNECTION ORDINANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title: ENCROACHMENT POLICY Number: 0132 Reference: Administrative Committee January 21, Adopted by City Council: February 2, 2009

ARTICLE 7 UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES AND PRACTICES COVENANT

City Of Attleboro Conservation Commission

Floodplain Development Land Use Review

Zoning Permit Application

DRY POND OPERATION & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

City of Palo Alto (ID # 4882) City Council Staff Report

Planning Commission Staff Report

Robert Armstrong, Director, Development & Environmental Services

Purpose: Regulations:

APPENDIX 7 SPECIAL NOTES FOR PLATS AND CONSTRUCTION PLANS

ORDINANCE NO

Storm Water Management Facility Restrictive Covenant Language

Land Uses, Maps, Illustrations and Locations

CITY OF SARALAND FINAL SUBDIVISION PLAT REVIEW

City of Duluth Development Regulations

PLYMOUTH PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION OR MAJOR SUBDIVISION

POLICIES & PROCEDURES MANUAL

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT AND COVENANT SUBDIVISION:

WATAB TOWNSHIP, BENTON COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA. ORDINANCE #4 (Amended November 2014) AN ORDINANCE REGULATING TOWN ROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY

Change 6, September 1, TITLE 18 WATER AND SEWERS 1

Private Landowner Contribution for Erosion Control Works

VILLAGE OF ASHVILLE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES DIVISION OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM STORMWATER CREDIT MANUAL

RIVERDALE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION SITE PLAN APPROVAL

Ordinance No. An Amendment to the City Code of Ordinances

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

GWINNETT COUNTY CSO CONSERVATION SUBDIVISION OVERLAY DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY WATER AGENCY ORDINANCE NO. WA0-0089

Flood Mitigation in the NYC West-of-Hudson Watershed A guide to Programs, Agencies and Funding Sources for Municipalities and Property Owners

Easement Program Guidelines for Water Resources and Stream Work

Open Space Model Ordinance

TOWN OF BRISTOL. Ontario County, New York APPLICATION FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT

FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST

ST. TAMMANY PARISH PATRICIA P. BRISTER PARISH PRESIDENT

ARTICLE V PRELIMINARY PLAN SUBMISSION

ARTICLE 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE

City of Suwanee Development Regulations ARTICLE 10 PLAN AND PLAT SPECIFICATIONS

EXCERPTS FROM HALIFAX REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY CHARTER

Preliminary Analysis

COUNCIL ACTION FORM. 1. The City Council can approve the Preliminary Plat for Menards Ames Subdivision

ARTICLE 9 SPECIFICATIONS FOR DOCUMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED

KENT COUNTY STORMWATER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT

BUILDING SANITARY SERVICE REPAIR ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

Transcription:

Drainage Maintenance Policy The purpose of this Drainage Maintenance Policy is to clarify how the City of McKinney may address various drainage and stormwater related concerns of residents. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 1. Per Texas state law, the City has no obligation to address flood or erosion hazards on private property. 2. The City does not by default have liability for damages on private property due to flooding or erosion. 3. The existence of an easement does not determine ownership and maintenance responsibility. 4. Drainage easements make no difference with respect to City obligations. The existence of a public easement only means the property may be used for a stated public purpose and the City does not need permission to enter. Easements do not create an obligation for the City to do anything. 5. Prescriptive drainage easements do not exist in Texas. 6. For work done by the City on private property outside a public easement, written permission is required from the property owner. 7. For work done by the City on private property within a public easement, permission is NOT required from the property owner, however, notification is strongly recommended. In the case of an emergency, there is not always sufficient time to provide notification. 8. All work done by the City must be done for a public benefit. Public money cannot be spent for a solely private benefit. Within reason, the City Council makes the determination as to what qualifies as a public benefit. 9. The City accepts ownership and maintenance responsibility of new infrastructure at the time of final acceptance of a project, not by the filing of a plat and/or the recording of an easement. 10. Natural creeks on private property are not owned by the City. The channel bottom, channel banks, and surrounding floodplain areas are owned by the property owner based on property boundary lines. Ownership and maintenance responsibility of natural creeks is not accepted by the City at the time of final acceptance of a development. In this sense, creeks are different than manmade drainage structures. 11. Manmade open channels are considered drainage structures. Natural creeks are not. 12. Standing water on private property is the responsibility of the property owner. The removal of standing water for aesthetic purposes or to eliminate the threat of mosquitoes is the responsibility of the property owner, not the City. Drainage Maintenance Policy Page 1 of 4

DEFINITIONS: 1. Drainage easement = the right to use another s real property for the purpose of conveying runoff either underground or on the ground surface. 2. Erosion hazard = a situation where erosion protected structures are at risk of damage by stormwater erosion. This includes a situation where stormwater erosion might cause a tree to fall on a residential dwelling or commercial building. 3. Erosion protected structures = all publicly owned structures (roads, bridges, hike and bike trails, headwalls, manholes, water lines, sewer lines, etc.) and some permitted, permanent, private structures allowed by current City code to be in their current location. This includes residential dwellings, commercial buildings, roads, parking lots, driveways, and pools. This does NOT include walls, fences, trees, shrubs, soil, turf, and lawns. 4. Flood hazard = a situation where floods up to and including the 100-yr fully developed flood would create a significant life safety threat and/or inundate residential dwellings, commercial buildings, roads, parking lots (by at least 1 ), and/or driveways (by at least 1 ). This does NOT include pools, sheds, carports, patios, and lawn areas. 5. Floodplain easement = the right to use another s real property for the purpose of conveying floodwaters. 6. Privately owned drainage structures = inlets, pipes, headwalls, riprap, gabions, channels, etc., owned by private property owners. This typically includes: a. detention ponds (both above and below ground), b. driveway culverts, inlets, pipes, headwalls, ditches, and swales within a single lot, and c. inlets and pipes running through residential backyards, typically maintained by an HOA. 7. Publicly owned drainage structures = inlets, pipes, headwalls, riprap, gabions, channels, etc., owned by the public. This typically includes: a. all drainage structures located on public property and b. drainage structures dedicated to and accepted by the City that convey runoff through multiple private properties. 8. Routine landscape maintenance = regular mowing, pruning, trimming, debris removal, tree removal, and rubbish removal. 9. Structural maintenance = repair/reconstruction of manmade structures (inlets, pipes, headwalls, culverts, bridges, riprap, gabions, channels, etc.). 10. Surface drainage easement = the right to use another s real property for the purpose of conveying runoff on the ground surface. Drainage Maintenance Policy Page 2 of 4

POLICY: 1. WHAT IS REQUIRED OF PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS? a. Private property owners shall perform all routine landscape maintenance on private property per City Ordinance. b. Private property owners shall perform all structural maintenance for privately owned drainage structures on private property. Some drainage structures are privately owned and maintained even when located within public drainage easements. 2. WHEN MAY THE CITY GET INVOLVED? a. If vegetation/debris/sediment is deemed by the City to be a flood hazard, the City may, as resources allow, remove the vegetation/debris/sediment for the purpose of removing the flood hazard. b. If stormwater erosion is deemed by the City to be an erosion hazard, the City may, as resources allow, address the erosion hazard. c. Whether on public or private property, the City shall perform all structural maintenance for publicly owned drainage structures. 3. HOW MAY THE CITY ADDRESS DRAINAGE CONCERNS? a. City staff will visit the site and thoroughly investigate the concern before making a determination. If City action is warranted, work will be prioritized using the Drainage Matrix. b. If the City does any work, the City must make clear in writing that on-going routine landscape maintenance continues to be the responsibility of the property owner. c. If routine landscape maintenance would have avoided the need for City action, the City may require reimbursement from the property owner for the expense of the work. 4. APPEAL PROCESS. Residents may appeal the decision of City staff to the City Council. A processing fee of $100 will be required for each appeal. At the earliest opportunity, the appeal will be brought to the City Council for a decision. Drainage Maintenance Policy Page 3 of 4

Relevant Excerpt from the Stormwater Ordinance: Section 130-265. Responsibilities of owners. e) Floodplain and surface drainage easements shall be maintained by the property owner; save and except subsurface structure maintenance as provided by section 130-191; or where maintenance is otherwise expressly assumed by the city; or where the city maintains the floodplain or easement to preserve flood conveyance under NFIP regulations mandatory municipal maintenance. Regardless of maintenance responsibility, adequate maintenance easements and physical access alongside and to the conveyance shall be provided. SUMMARY: The City of McKinney is not by default liable for flooding or erosion concerns on private property. Easements do not change that. However, some drainage concerns on private property may be addressed based on the following: The City will consider addressing drainage concerns on private property if the answer is yes to one of the following questions: 1. Does the issue pose a significant life safety threat? 2. Does the issue create a flood hazard? 3. Does the issue create an erosion hazard? If the answer is yes to one of those questions, this does not guarantee that the City will address the issue. It only means that the City will investigate the issue and provide a Matrix score for it. Priority of work will then be determined based on the Matrix score in relation to other projects and on the cost of improvements and available funds. The City will seek out the most cost effective solution to address each problem. Drainage Maintenance Policy Page 4 of 4

City of McKinney Drainage Maintenance Priority Matrix Description: Location: Date of Evaluation: Evaluator(s): Case ID Number: Category Key Question Guidance Score Life safety Is there a life safety risk? no risk = 0. Some risk = 5. High risk = 9. Flood risk Erosion risk Are residential dwellings, commercial buildings, and/or roads currently at an increased risk of flooding from storms up to and including the 100-yr storm? Are erosion protected structures at risk of damage by erosion from storms up to and including the 100-yr storm? Flood damage unlikely = 0. Flood damage is a possibility = 4. Flood damage likely = 7. Erosion damage unlikely = 0. Erosion damage is a possibility = 3. Erosion damage likely = 6. Economic impact Would improvements likely enhance property values and/or provide an economic benefit to the City? No economic benefit = 0. Slight benefit = 1. Moderate benefit = 2. Significant benefit = 3. Accessible to the public Impact on water quality and the environment Aesthetic impact Is the area accessible to the public? Would improvements likely create a healthier aquatic environment? Would improvements likely benefit the riparian/lacustrine habitat? Would improvements likely create a more pleasant area for human enjoyment and appreciation? No public access = 0. Limited public access = 1. Full public access = 2. No benefit = 0. Some benefit = 1. Significant benefit = 2. No = 0. Yes = 1. Maximum score = 30. A higher score means that improvements are a higher priority for the City. Overall Score = Notes: 1 Nov 2016