AGENDA L'ORDRE DU JOUR - PDF Free Download

TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING May 30, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. Gaston R. Patenaude Hall 717 Notre-Dame Street Embrun ON CANTON DE RUSSELL RÉUNION DU COMITÉ CONSULTATIF SUR L'AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE Le 30 mai 2016 à 19 h Salle Gaston R. Patenaude 717, rue Notre-Dame Embrun ON AGENDA L'ORDRE DU JOUR PAGE NO. 1. ROLL CALL APPEL a. Mr. Leroux calls the meeting to order at 7 p.m. Be is resolved that we open this meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee. M. Leroux fait le rappel à l'ordre à 19 h. Il est proposé que la séance du comité consultatif sur l'aménagement du territoire soit ouverte. 2. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS OR AMENDMENTS ADJONCTIONS, EFFACEMENTS OU MODIFICATIONS 3. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA ADOPTION DE L'ORDRE DU JOUR a. Be it resolved that we approuve the agenda as presented. Il est résolu que l'ordre du jour est adopté tel que présenté. 4. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST DÉCLARATION D'INTÉRÊT PÉCUNIAIRE 5. ADOPTION OF MINUTES L'ADOPTION DES PROCÈS-VERBAUX

a. Be it resolved that the minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee held on April 25, 2016, be approuved as presented. 8-12 Il est résolu que le procès-verbal de la réunion du comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire du 25 avril 2016 soit adopté tel que présenté. 6. REPORTS FROM THE DEPARTMENT AND RESOLUTIONS RAPPORTS DU DÉPARTEMENT ET RÉSOLUTIONS a. Amendment to zoning by-law 46-2011 of the Township of Russell - Joel Poirier, Part of Lot 11, Concession 2, Part 5 on Plan 50R2595, a vacant property on Bank Street in Russell (Report PD-28-2016). 13-24 Report presented by Alix Jolicoeur Whereas the following items have been considered by the Planning Advisory Committee; And Whereas the Planning Advisory Committee concurs with the Planning Department s recommendations on the following item and so recommends to Council; Now therefore be it resolved that: The Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges receipt of Report # PD-28-2016 and approves as recommended a zoning amendment submitted by Joel Poirier, for the property legally described as being Part of Lot 11, Concession 2, Part 5 on Plan 50R2595, known as a vacant parcel of land on Bank Street in Russell, subject to the conditions identified in the report. Modification au règlement de zonage 46-2011 de la Municipalité de Russell - Joel Poirier, partie du lot 11, concession 2, partie 5 sur le plan 50R2595, un lot vacant sur la rue Bank à Russell (PD-28-2016) Rapport présenté par Alix Jolicoeur Alors que le dossier suivant a été examiné par le Planning Advisory Committee May 30, 2016 Page 2 of 72

Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire; Et considérant que Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire souscrit aux recommandations du Service de l'urbanisme sur les éléments suivants et ainsi recommande au Conseil; Il est maintenant proposé que : Le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire accuse réception du rapport no PD-28-2016 et approuve les recommandations concernant l application d une modification de zonage temporaire soumise par Joel Poirier, pour la propriété légalement décrite comme étant une partie du lot 11, concession 2, partie 5 sur le plan 50R2595, connue comme étant une parcelle de terrain vacante sur la rue Bank à Russell, sous réserve des conditions indiquées dans le rapport. b. Amendment to zoning by-law 46-2011 of the Township of Russell - 1605671 Ontario Inc., Part Lot 19 on Plan H.O. Wood 1866 E, 1079 Notre Dame, Embrun (PD-26-2016) 25-38 Report presented by Alix Jolicoeur Whereas the following items have been considered by the Planning Advisory Committee; And Whereas the Planning Advisory Committee concurs with the Planning Department s recommendations on the following item and so recommends to Council; Now therefore be it resolved that: The Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges receipt of Report # PD-26-2016 and approves as recommended a zoning amendment submitted by 1605671 Ontario Inc., for the property legally described as being Part of Lot 19, on Plan H.O. Wood 1866 E, known as 1079 Notre Dame Street in Embrun, subject to the conditions identified in the report. Modification au règlement de zonage 46-2011 de la Municipalité de Russell - 1605671 Ontario Inc., partie du lot 19, sur le plan H.O. Wood 1866 E, 1079 rue Notre Dame à Embrun (PD-26-2016) Planning Advisory Committee May 30, 2016 Page 3 of 72

Rapport présenté par Alix Jolicoeur Alors que le dossier suivant a été examiné par le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire; Et considérant que Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire souscrit aux recommandations du Service de l'urbanisme sur les éléments suivants et ainsi recommande au Conseil; Il est maintenant proposé que : Le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire accuse réception du rapport no PD-26-2016 et approuve les recommandations concernant l application d une modification de zonage soumise par 1605671 Ontario Inc., pour la propriété légalement décrite comme étant une partie du lot 19, sur le plan H.O. Wood 1866 E, connue comme étant le 1079, rue Notre Dame à Embrun, sous réserve des conditions indiquées dans le rapport. c. Amendment to zoning by-law 46-2011 of the Township of Russell - 2035382 Ontario Inc. - Lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 and 74, Plan 50M313, and known as 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 and 269 Belfort Street in Embrun (PD-31-2016) 39-48 Report presented by Claire Roy Whereas the following items have been considered by the Planning Advisory Committee; And Whereas the Planning Advisory Committee concurs with the Planning Department s recommendations on the following item and so recommends to Council; Now therefore be it resolved that: The Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges receipt of Report # PD-31-2016 and approves as recommended a zoning amendment submitted by 2035382 Ontario Inc. - for the properties legally described as Lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 and 74, Plan 50M313, and known as 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 and 269 Belfort Street in Embrun, subject to the conditions identified in the report. Modification au règlement de zonage 46-2011 de la Planning Advisory Committee May 30, 2016 Page 4 of 72

Municipalité de Russell - 2035382 Ontario Inc. - Lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 and 74, plan 50M313, et connue comme étant le 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 et 269, rue Belfort à Embrun (PD- 31-2016) Rapport présenté par Claire Roy Alors que le dossier suivant a été examiné par le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire; Et considérant que Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire souscrit aux recommandations du Service de l'urbanisme sur les éléments suivants et ainsi recommande au Conseil; Il est maintenant proposé que : Le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire accuse réception du rapport no PD-31-2016 et approuve les recommandations concernant l application d une modification de zonage soumise par 2035382 Ontario Inc., pour les propriétés légalement décrites comme étant les lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 et 74 sur le plan 50M313, connue comme étant le 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 et 269, rue Belfort, à Embrun, sous réserve des conditions indiquées dans le rapport. d. Amendment to zoning by-law 46-2011 of the Township of Russell - Melanie Construction Inc. - Lots 105, 106 & 107 on Plan 50M320, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 and 224 Capri Avenue, Embrun (PD-30-2016) 49-59 Report presented by Claire Roy Whereas the following items have been considered by the Planning Advisory Committee; And Whereas the Planning Advisory Committee concurs with the Planning Department s recommendations on the following item and so recommends to Council; Now therefore be it resolved that: The Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges receipt of Report # PD-30-2016 and approves as recommended a zoning amendment submitted by Melanie Construction Inc., for the property legally described as being Lots 105, 106 & 107 on Plan Planning Advisory Committee May 30, 2016 Page 5 of 72

50M320, known as 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 and 224 Capri Avenue in Embrun, subject to the conditions identified in the report. Modification au règlement de zonage 46-2011 de la Municipalité de Russell - Melanie Construction Inc., lots 105, 106 et 107 sur le plan 50M320, 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 et 224, avenue Capri à Embrun (PD-30-2016) Rapport présenté par Claire Roy Alors que le dossier suivant a été examiné par le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire; Et considérant que Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire souscrit aux recommandations du Service de l'urbanisme sur les éléments suivants et ainsi recommande au Conseil; Il est maintenant proposé que : Le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire accuse réception du rapport no PD-30-2016 et approuve les recommandations concernant l application d une modification de zonage soumise par Melanie Construction inc., pour la propriété légalement décrite comme étant les lots 105, 106 et 107 sur le plan 50M320, connue comme étant les 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 et 224, avenue Capri, à Embrun, sous réserve des conditions indiquées dans le rapport. e. Amendment to zoning by-law 46-2011 of the Township of Russell - DEVCORE Construction - Block 123 on Plan 50M320, known as 120-126 St-Malo Street in Embrun (PD-32-2016) 60-72 Report presented by Alix Jolicoeur Whereas the following items have been considered by the Planning Advisory Committee; And Whereas the Planning Advisory Committee concurs with the Planning Department s recommendations on the following item and so recommends to Council; Now therefore be it resolved that: The Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges receipt of Report # PD-32-2016 and approves as recommended a zoning amendment submitted by DEVCORE Construction, for the property legally Planning Advisory Committee May 30, 2016 Page 6 of 72

described as being Block 123 on Plan 50M320, known as 120-126 St-Malo Street in Embrun, subject to the conditions identified in the report. Modification au règlement de zonage 46-2011 de la Municipalité de Russell - DEVCORE Construction, bloc 123 sur le plan 50M320, 120-126, rue St-Malo à Embrun (PD-32-2016) Rapport présenté par Alix Jolicoeur Alors que le dossier suivant a été examiné par le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire; Et considérant que Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire souscrit aux recommandations du Service de l'urbanisme sur les éléments suivants et ainsi recommande au Conseil; Il est maintenant proposé que : Le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire accuse réception du rapport no PD-32-2016 et approuve les recommandations concernant l application d une modification de zonage soumise par DEVCORE Construction, pour la propriété légalement décrite comme étant le bloc 123 sur le plan 50M320, connue comme étant le 120-126, rue St-Malo à Embrun, sous réserve des conditions indiquées dans le rapport. 7. QUESTION PERIOD ON MEETING OF THE DAY PÉRIODE DES QUESTIONS SUR LA RÉUNION DU JOUR 8. NEXT MEETING PROCHAINE RÉUNION Next Meeting: June 27, 2016 at 7 p.m. Prochaine réunion: le 27 juin 2016 à 19 h. 9. ADJOURNMENT AJOURNEMENT a. Be it resolved that we close this meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee at 7:xx p.m. Il est proposé que la séance du comité d'aménagement du territoire soit levée à 19 h xx. Planning Advisory Committee May 30, 2016 Page 7 of 72

TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Aprl 25, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. Gaston R. Patenaude Hall 717 Notre-Dame Street Embrun ON CANTON DE RUSSELL RÉUNION DU COMITÉ CONSULTATIF SUR L'AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE Le 25 avril 2016 à 19 h Salle Gaston R. Patenaude 717, rue Notre-Dame Embrun ON MINUTES PROCÈS-VERBAL Committee Members Present: Membres du comité présents: Jamie Laurin, Councillor/conseiller Cindy Saucier, Councillor/conseillère Calvin Pol, member of the public/membre du public Mélanie Gervais, member of the public/membre du public Jean-Guy Bisson, member of the public/membre du public Dominique Tremblay, Planning Director/Directrice Aménagement du territoire Claire Roy, Planning technician/technicienne de Nathalie Levac, Administrative Assistant/Assistante administrative 1. ROLL CALL 1. APPEL a. Mr. Laurin calls the meeting to order at 7:45 p.m. a. M. Laurin fait le rappel à l'ordre à 19 h 45. 2. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS OR AMENDMENTS 2. ADJONCTIONS, EFFACEMENTS OU MODIFICATIONS 3. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA 3. ADOPTION DE L'ORDRE DU JOUR Moved by Councillor Cindy Saucier Seconded by Mélanie Gervais Be it resolved that we approve the agenda as presented. Proposé par Councillor Cindy Saucier Appuyé par Mélanie Gervais Il est résolu que l ordre du jour soit adopté tel que présenté. Planning Advisory Committee April 25, 2016 Page 8 of 72

MOTION APPROVED 4. DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 4. DÉCLARATION D'INTÉRÊT PÉCUNIAIRE MOTION ADOPTÉE 5. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 5. L'ADOPTION DES PROCÈS-VERBAUX a. Minutes of March 29, 2016 a. Procès-verbal du 29 mars 2016 Moved by Calvin Pol Seconded by Jean-Guy Bisson Be it resolved that the minutes of the Planning Advisory Committee held on March 29, 2016 be approved as presented. MOTION APPROVED 6. REPORTS FROM THE DEPARTMENT AND RESOLUTIONS Amendment to zoning by-law 46-2011 of the Township of Russell James Kinkaid, Part of Lot 4, Concession 3, 1679 South Russell Road in Russell (Report PD-19-2016) Proposé par Calvin Pol Appuyé par Jean-Guy Bisson Il est résolu que le procès-verbal de la réunion du comité de consultation sur l'aménagement du territoire du 29 mars 2016 soit adopté tel que présenté. MOTION ADOPTÉE 6. RAPPORTS DU DÉPARTEMENT ET RÉSOLUTIONS Modification au règlement de zonage 46-2011 de la Municipalité de Russell James Kinkaid, partie du lot 4, concession 3, 1679, ch. South Russell à Russell (Rapport PD-19-2016) Report presented by Claire Roy Questions from the committee: Mr. Bisson asks if is it necessary to keep all 5 accessory buildings. Ms. Roy states all buildings are being used and review of the existing zoning by-law will probably raise the maximum number of buildings from 2. Questions from the public: None Moved by Mélanie Gervais Rapport présenté par Claire Roy. Questions des membres du comité : M. Bisson demande s'il est nécessaire de garder les 5 bâtiments accessoires sur la propriété. Mme Roy répond que tous les bâtiments sont présentement utilisés et que le règlement de zonage existant sera révisé et ce maximum de 2 bâtiments accessoires sera probablement augmenté. Questions du public : Aucune Proposé par Mélanie Gervais Planning Advisory Committee April 25, 2016 Page 2 of 5 Page 9 of 72

Seconded by Calvin Pol Whereas the following item has been considered by the Planning Advisory Committee; And Whereas the Planning Advisory Committee concurs with the Planning Department s recommendations on the following item and so recommends to Council; Now therefore be it resolved that: The Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges receipt of Report # PD- 19-2016 and approves as recommended a zoning amendment submitted by James Kinkaid, for the property legally described as being Part of Lot 4, Concession 3, and known as 1679 South Russell Road in Russell, subject to the conditions identified in the report. MOTION APPROVED b. Gilles & Nathalie Cousineau, Pt Lot 5, Con 6, 1064 Route 400, Embrun(PD-26-2016) Appuyé par Calvin Pol Alors que le dossier suivant a été examiné par le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire; Et considérant que Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire souscrit aux recommandations du Service de l'urbanisme sur les éléments suivants et ainsi recommande au Conseil; Il est maintenant proposé que : Le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire accuse réception du rapport no PD-16-2016 et approuve les recommandations concernant l application d une modification de zonage temporaire soumise par Harvey Mitton, pour la propriété légalement décrite comme étant une partie du lot 4, concession 3, et connue comme étant le 1679, ch. South Russell à Russell, sous réserve des conditions indiquées dans le rapport. MOTION ADOPTÉE b. Gilles & Nathalie Cousineau, Pt Lot 5, Con 6, 1064 Route 400, Embrun(PD-26-2016) Report presented by Claire Roy Rapport présenté par Claire Roy Questions from the committee: None Question des membres du comité : Aucune Questions du public : Questions from the public: Mr. Charles Armstrong, 85 Castlebeau, Embrun, asks that the Planning Advisory Committee asks Council to aprouves a severance, are they aware M. Charles Armstrong, 85 Castlebeau, Embrun, demande si lorsque le Comité consultatif sur l'aménagement du territoire demande au Conseil d'approuver une demande d'autorisation, sont-ils au courant de tous ses impacts et Planning Advisory Committee April 25, 2016 Page 3 of 5 Page 10 of 72

of all its impacts and conditions. Mr. Laurin corrects Mr. Armstrong by explaining that the Planning Advisory Committee does not ask Council to approuve anything. It is staff who present the reports to the committee, who make their recommendations, and then staff asks Council to make a decision based on these recommendations. Ms. Tremblay adds that severances are not presented to Council. This Planning Advisory Committee simply makes recommendations to the United Counties of Prescott & Russell. Consent applications are made through the Counties who then circulate the application to other organizations for comments, conditions and recommendations. The decision for approval is up to the Counties. conditions. M. Laurin corrige M. Armstrong en expliquant que le Comité consultatif sur l'aménagement du territoire ne demande pas conseil d'approuver quoi que ce soit. C'est le personnel qui présente les rapports au comité, qui font leurs recommandations, puis le personnel demande au Conseil de prendre une décision basé de ces recommandations. Mme Tremblay ajoute que les demandes d'autorisation ne sont pas présentés au Conseil. Le comité consultatif sur l'aménagement du territoire fourni simplement des recommandations aux Comtés unis de Prescott et Russell. Les demandes de consentement sont faites à travers les Comtés qui circulent ensuite la demande à d'autres organisations pour recevoir de commentaires, conditions et recommandations. La décision d'approbation est faite par les Comtés. Moved by Mélanie Gervais Seconded by Councillor Cindy Saucier Whereas the following item has been considered by the Planning Advisory Committee; And Whereas the Planning Advisory Committee concurs with the Planning Department s recommendations on the following item and so recommends to Council; Now therefore be it resolved that: The Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges receipt of Report # PD- 26-2016 and approves as recommended a zoning amendment submitted by Gilles & Nathalie Cousineau, for the property legally Proposé par Mélanie Gervais Appuyé par Councillor Cindy Saucier Alors que le dossier suivant a été examiné par le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire; Et considérant que Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire souscrit aux recommandations du Service de l'urbanisme sur les éléments suivants et ainsi recommande au Conseil; Il est maintenant proposé que : Le Comité consultatif sur l aménagement du territoire accuse réception du rapport no PD-26-2016 et approuve les recommandations concernant l application d une modification de zonage temporaire soumise par Gilles et Nathalie Cousineau, pour la propriété légalement Planning Advisory Committee April 25, 2016 Page 4 of 5 Page 11 of 72

described as being Part of Lot 5, Concession 6, and known as 1064 Route 400 in Embrun, subject to the conditions identified in the report. MOTION APPROVED 7. QUESTION PERIOD ON MEETING OF THE DAY 8. NEXT MEETING Next Meeting: May 30, 2016 at 7 p.m. décrite comme étant une partie du lot 5, concession 6, et connue comme étant le 1064, Route 400 à Embrun, sous réserve des conditions indiquées dans le rapport. MOTION ADOPTÉE 7. PÉRIODE DES QUESTIONS SUR LA RÉUNION DU JOUR 8. PROCHAINE RÉUNION Prochaine réunion: 30 mai 2016 à 19 h. 9. ADJOURNMENT 9. AJOURNEMENT Moved by Councillor Cindy Saucier Seconded by Mélanie Gervais Be it resolved that we close this meeting of the Planning Advisory Committee at 8:03p.m. Proposé par Councillor Cindy Saucier Appuyé par Mélanie Gervais Il est proposé que la séance du comité d aménagement du territoire soit levée à 20 h 03. MOTION APPROVED MOTION ADOPTÉE Planning Advisory Committee April 25, 2016 Page 5 of 5 Page 12 of 72

6. a. REPORT TO PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE RAPPORT AU COMITÉ CONSULTATIF SUR L AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE PD-28-2016 DATE: May 30 mai 2016 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT PT LOT 11, CONC. 2, PT 5 ON PLAN 50R-2595 MODIFICATION DU RÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE PT LOT 11, CONC. 2, PT 5 ON PLAN 50R-2595 SUBJECT Zoning By-law Amendment Properties owned by Joel Poirier and legally described as being Part of Lot 11, Concession 2 being Part 5 on Plan 50R-2595. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends the approval of the zoning amendment application submitted by Joel Poirier for the following: 1. That the zoning of the vacant parcel of land legally described as Part of Lot 11, Concession 2 being Part 5 on Plan 50R-2595 (shown on Map 1) be amended from Residential One to Residential 2 in order to build a semi-detached dwelling on the lot. This amendment application is for a parcel created by consent SUJET Demande de changement de zonage propriétaire Joel Poirier et légalement décrite comme étant partie du lot 11, concession 2, étant la partie 5 du plan 50R-2595. RECOMMANDATION Le département d urbanisme recommande l approbation de la modification au règlement de zonage soumis par Joel Poirier pour : 1. ue le zonage de la parcelle de terrain vacante légalement décrite comme étant une partie du lot 11, concession 2 étant la partie 5 du plan 50R-2595 (représenté sur la carte 1) soit modifiée de «zone résidentielle un (R1)» à «zone résidentielle deux (R2)» pour construire une habitation jumelée sur le terrain. Cette demande de modification est pour la parcelle créée par la 1 Page 13 of 72

application B-018-2015, approved August 26, 2015. demande d autorisation B-018-2015, approuvée le 25 août 2015. FINANCIAL IMPLICATION IMPLICATIONS FINANCIÈRES N/A s. o. BUSINESS PLAN N/A PLAN D AFFAIRE s. o. STRATEGIC PLAN N/A COMMUNICATION PLAN Notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the property and sent by mail to all property owners within 120 metres of the subject property on May 10, 2016. A public meeting will be held on May 30, 2016 at 7:00 pm at the Gaston Patenaude Hall. Notice of the decision within 15 days to all property owners within 120 m and anyone requesting in writing to be notified of the decision. PLAN STRATÉGIQUE s. o. PLAN DE COMMUNICATION Le 10 mai 2016, un avis concernant l amendement proposé a été installé sur la propriété et a été envoyé par courrier à tous les propriétaires à l intérieur d une zone de 120 mètres de la propriété en question. Une réunion publique est prévue le 30 mai 2016 à 19 h dans la salle Gaston Patenaude. Un avis de décision sera envoyé dans un délai de 15 jours à tous les propriétaires d une zone de 120 mètres de la propriété en question et à tous ceux et celles qui ont fait la demande par écrit d être avisés de la décision. 2 Page 14 of 72

PREPARED BY PRÉPARÉ PAR: Alix Jolicoeur, Planner/Urbaniste Date: May 30 mai 2016 APPROVAL(S) APPROBATION(S): Dominique Tremblay, Planning Directior/Directrice en aménagement du territoire Date: May 30 mai 2016 3 Page 15 of 72

PROJECT DESCRIPTION DU PROJET HISTORY Joel Poirier has submitted an application for zoning amendment for his property, Part of Lot 11, Concession 2 being Part 5 on Plan 50R-2595. The subject property was the subject of a consent application (File No. B-018-2015) whereby the owner severed the lot from an existing residential parcel known as 431 Church St. The consent application received approval from the United Counties of Prescott and Russell on August 26, 2015. HISTORIQUE Joel Poirier a soumis une demande de changement de zonage pour la propriété, partie du lot 11, concession 2, étant la partie 5 sur le plan 50R-2595. La propriété a récemment été le sujet d une demande de morcellement (dossier n o B-018-2015) par laquelle le propriétaire a proposé de détacher une parcelle résidentielle contenant une maison unifamiliale isolée connue comme étant le 431, rue Church. La demande d autorisation a reçu une l approbation des Comtés unis de Prescott et Russell le 26 août 2015. MAP AND PICTURE(S) OF THE PROPERTY CARTE ET PHOTO(S) DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ Map 1 : Location Map Carte de localisation Subject Property Propriété en question 4 Page 16 of 72

Map 2 - Conditional Approval - Consent Application B-018-2015 Existing house at 431 Church 5 Page 17 of 72

FIGURE 1 : Pictures of the Proposed Property DISCUSSION PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT (2014) The Provincial Policy Statement states that settlement areas, such as the Village of Russell, should be the focus of growth and their vitality and regeneration promoted. Section 1.1.3.2 of the PPS directs land use patterns within settlement areas by stating: Land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on: a) Densities and a mix of land uses which: 1. Efficiently use land and resources; 2. Are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available, and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion; 3. Minimize negative impacts to air quality and climate change, and promote energy efficiency; 4. Support active transportation; b) A range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment in accordance with the criteria in policy 1.1.3.3. The PPS also refers to the promotion of opportunities for intensification and compact built form within settlement areas in order to make use of planned and existing services and amenities. It is the role of Planning Authorities to identify lands that are appropriate for intensification and where redevelopment can be accommodated, a process completed through the policies of the Official Plan (section 1.1.3.3). 6 Page 18 of 72

The proposed zoning by-law amendment would allow for intensification in an area and on a lot where municipal water and sewer services are available and which represents an efficient use of land. The proposed semi-detached dwelling would be within easy walking and cycling distance of the Village Core of Russell. UNITED COUNTIES OF PRESCOTT AND RUSSELL (UCPR) OFFICIAL PLAN The United Counties of Prescott and Russell Official Plan designates the subject property as Urban Policy Area, a designation that is intend to absorb a significant portion of future growth in the United Counties of Prescott Russell. The urban policy area is intended to provide a range and mix of low, medium and high density housing types to satisfy a broad range of residential requirements and ensure that affordable housing is available, but low rise and low density housing forms such as single-detached and semi-detached dwelling units shall continue to predominate. Infill development should also, according the UCPR Official Plan, be in areas with full municipal servicing, designed to be compatible with established communities, and consider the impact of the proposed development in terms of parking, traffic, open spaces and proposed uses. The proposed semi-detached dwelling would be a slight increase in density in an established neighbourhood while still maintaining scale and compatibility with the existing community. It is proposed on full municipal services and sufficient reserve capacity in water and waste water facilities exists. The proposed development would add only two units to the existing urban fabric, and two parking spaces are proposed for each unit. The dwellings are proposed for an existing built community with nearby access to parks including Duncanville Park and Burton Park which are within walking distance. The proposed dwellings are also within walking dsitance to the Village Core of Russell and the Keith M. Boyd Museum. TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL ZONING BY-LAW The subject property is zoned Residential One (R1). The proposed amendment is to change the zoning of the lot (shown on Map 1) from Residential One (R1) to Residential Two (R2) in order to permit the proposed semi-detached dwelling. 7 Page 19 of 72

The Zoning By-law #46-2011 provisions for the Residential Two zone (R2) are compared with the proposed project below. TABLE 1: ZONE REQUIREMENTS ZONING MECHANISM REQUIRED PROVIDED Lot Area (minimum) 300 sq.m. per dwelling unit = 890.3 sq.m. (total) 600 sq.m. Lot Frontage (minimum) 10 m per dwelling unit 10.14 m + per dwelling unit Front Yard Setback 6 m 6.4 m + (minimum) Interior Side Yard Setback 1.5 m 3.60 m (minimum) Exterior Side Yard Setback 4 m 5.19 m + (minimum) Rear Yard Setback 7.5 m 11.06 m + (minimum) Lot Coverage (maximum) 40% 25.3 % Dwellings per lot 1 1 (maximum) Parking (minimum) 4 4 In order to determine if adequate parking was provided Joel Poirier was asked if there was any intention of future secondary dwelling units, basement suites for example. Mr. Poirier indicated there was no intention of adding secondary suites. Based on this parking is deemed to be adequate. 8 Page 20 of 72

MAP 3: SKETCH OF PROPOSED SEMI-DETACHED DWELLINGS FIGURE 2: FRONT ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING FIGURE 3: RIGHT ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED SEMI-DETACHED DWELLING 9 Page 21 of 72

DISCUSSION The massing and scale of the proposed buildings is in keeping with the mix of building heights and massing for the street. The street currently contains a mix of one to two-storey single detached residential buildings in a variety of construction styles. The proposed project should have minimal impact on traffic as it is adding only two units. During consultation a concern was raised regarding whether the proposed project is in the proposed heritage conservation district. The lot is not located within the boundaries of the heritage conservation district identified in a report to Council October 19, 2015 which approved moving forward with extensive public consultations. The proposed semi-detached dwelling would conform to the zoning requirements of the Residential Two (R2) zone. The zoning amendment and proposed semi-detached dwelling is in keeping with the United Counties of Prescott-Russell Official Plan which encourages intensification in urban areas and the promotion of communities which support active transportation. The project would also be in keeping with the intent of the Township of Russell Official Plan which has as visions the promotion of healthy communities through the encouragement of land-use patterns which support non-motorized movement. The proposed semi-detached dwelling is permitted under the Residential designation the site holds. The proposed project is in line with Provincial Policies as set out in the Provincial Policy Statement including intensification and compact land-use patterns that support active transportation. The applicant has identified an intention to try and keep the existing trees on the property where possible. The lot is located approximately 400 m from lots zoned Village Core in Russell, and within walking distance to more than one park. Increased density at this location is in keeping with the PPS, the UCPR Official Plan, and the Township of Russell Official Plan. 10 Page 22 of 72

CONSULTATION The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment was circulated internally within the Township of Russell and to external agencies for comment. Responses received are attached. A summary of comments received is provided below: Rogers Cablesystems (Joan Zacharias) Enbridge Gas Distribution (Allison Sadler) United Counties of Prescott and Russell (Sylvain Boudreault) Canada Post (André Rochon) Bell Canada South Nation Conservation Authority (Benoit Duquette) Hydro One Networks Inc. Embrun Hydro Cooperative Eastern Ontario Health Unit (Sylvain Diotte) Russell Fire Department (Bruce Armstrong/Brian Duhamel) Township of Russell Building Services (Julia Tuff) Application was reviewed and there were no concerns or objections. Application was reviewed and there were no objections. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Reason Hydro One Service Area. I will have to have a full review on the building before a permit is issued my only other comment is that municipal services must be provided. Actually I would also like to review the existing house to ensure the wall that is now closer to the property line meets the code requirements for unprotected openings. 11 Page 23 of 72

6. b. REPORT TO PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE RAPPORT AU COMITÉ CONSULTATIF SUR L AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE PD-26-2016 & PD-27-2016 DATE: May 30 mai 2016 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT & WATERAND SEWER SERVICES ALLOCATION PT LOT 8, CONC. 8, PT LOT 18 ON PLAN H.O. WOOD 1866 E MODIFICATION DU RÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE SUBJECT Zoning By-law Amendment & application for Water and Sewer allocations Properties owned by 1605671 Ontario Inc. and legally described as being Part of Lot 8, Concession 8 being Part of Lot 18 on Plan H.O. Wood 1866 E, known as 1079 Notre Dame Street in Embrun. SUJET Demande de changement de zonage et demande d allocation d unités d eau et d égouts - propriétaires 1605671 Ontario inc., pour la propriété légalement décrite comme étant partie du lot 8, concession 8, étant une partie du lot 18 sur le plan Plan H.O. Wood 1866, connue sous le 1079, rue Notre Dame à Embrun. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends the approval of the zoning amendments application submitted by 1605671 Ontario Inc. with the additional conditions described below: 1. That the zoning of the vacant parcel of land legally described as Part of Lot 8, Concession 8 being Part of Lot 18 on Plan H.O. Wood 1866 E, known as 1079 Notre Dame Street in Embrun (shown on RECOMMANDATION Le département d urbanisme recommande l approbation des modifications au règlement de zonage soumis par 1605671 Ontario inc. avec les conditions supplémentaires telles que décrites ci-dessous : 1. ue le zonage de la parcelle de terrain vacante légalement décrite comme étant une partie du lot 8, concession 8 faisant partie du lot 18 sur le plan H.O. Wood 1866 E, connu sous le 1079, rue Notre 1 Page 25 of 72

Map 1) be amended from Residential One (R1) to Residential Three - exception XX (R3-XX) in order to build an apartment building on the lot. The exception would permit the reduced minimum lot frontage of 14.5 m from 20 m, reduced side yards of 3 m from 6 m and require a reduced maximum height 10 m. 2. That the allocation of three additional water and sewer units be approved in order to permit the proposed number of dwelling units. Dame à Embrun (indiquée sur la carte 1) soit modifiée de «zone résidentielle un (R1)» à «zone résidentielle trois - exception XX (R3-XX)» pour construire un immeuble à appartements sur le terrain. L exception permettrait la façade minimale du lot réduite à 14,5 m de 20 m, la cour latérale réduite de 6 m à 3 m et une réduction de la hauteur maximale du batiment à 10 m. 2. ue l allocation de trois unités d eau et d égouts additionnelles soit approuvée afin de permettre le développement du nombre d unités proposés. FINANCIAL IMPLICATION IMPLICATIONS FINANCIÈRES N/A s. o. BUSINESS PLAN N/A STRATEGIC PLAN N/A PLAN D AFFAIRE s. o. PLAN STRATÉGIQUE s. o. COMMUNICATION PLAN Notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the property and sent by mail to all property owners within 120 metres of the subject property on May 10, 2016. A public meeting will be held on May 30, 2016 at 7:00 pm at the Gaston Patenaude Hall. Notice of the decision within 15 days to anyone requesting in writing to be notified of the PLAN DE COMMUNICATION Le 10 mai 2016, un avis concernant l amendement proposé a été installé sur la propriété et a été envoyé par courrier à tous les propriétaires dans une zone de 120 mètres de la propriété en question. Une réunion publique est prévue pour le 30 mai 2016 à 19 h dans la salle Gaston Patenaude. Un avis de décision sera envoyé dans un délai de 15 jours à tous les propriétaires dans une zone 2 Page 26 of 72

decision. de 120 mètres de la propriété en question et à tous ceux et celles qui ont fait la demande par écrit d être avisés de la décision. PREPARED BY PRÉPARÉ PAR: Alix Jolicoeur, Planner/Urbaniste Date: May 30 mai 2016 APPROVAL(S) APPROBATION(S): Dominique Tremblay, Planning Director/Directrice en aménagement du territoire Date: May 30 mai 2016 3 Page 27 of 72

PROJECT DESCRIPTION DU PROJET HISTORY 1605671 Ontario Inc, hereafter referred to as the applicant has submitted an application for zoning amendment for the property, Part of Lot 8, Concession 8 being Part of Lot 18 on Plan H.O. Wood 1866 E, known as 1079 Notre Dame Street in Embrun. The applicant also submitted an application for water and sewer service allocation. The property at 1079 Notre Dame Street is a vacant lot located between a property zoned Residential Three Exception 40 (R3-40) to the west and a property zoned Institutional exception 5 (I-5) to the east. The residential property currently has a two-storey triplex (approximately 8 m tall) built in 2003. The institutional property to the east is currently a one-storey daycare center (approximately 5.9 m tall) set midway back on the lot and with a play yard on the west side of the building adjacent to the subject lot. Across the street from 1079 Notre Dame is zoned Residential One (R1) with two existing one storey single family homes directly across the street. HISTORIQUE Le demandeur, 1605671 Ontario Inc, a présenté une demande de modification de zonage de la propriété, une partie du lot 8, concession 8 faisant partie du lot 18 sur le plan H.O. Bois 1866 E, connu sous le 1079, rue Notre Dame à Embrun. Le requérant a également présenté une demande d'allocation de services d'eau et d'égout. La propriété au 1079, rue Notre Dame est un lot vacant situé entre une propriété dans une zone résidentielle trois exception 40 (R3-40) à l ouest et une propriété dans une zone institutionnelle exception 5 (I-5) à l est. Un triplex à deux étages construit récemment occupe présentement la propriété résidentielle (environ 8 m en hauteur). Sur la propriété zonée institutionnelle à l est, il y une garderie à un étage (environ 5,9 m de hauteur). La garderie est placée au milieu de son terrain et a une cour adjacente au lot en question. Le terrain en face du 1079, rue Notre Dame est présentement zoné (R1) et est occupé par deux habitations isolées d un étage exitantes directement en face. 4 Page 28 of 72

MAP AND PICTURE(S) OF THE PROPERTY CARTE ET PHOTO(S) DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ Map 1 : Location Map Carte 1 : Carte de localisation Subject Property Propriété en question Picture of the Proposed Property Picture of properties across the street 5 Page 29 of 72

DISCUSSION PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT (2014) The Provincial Policy Statement states that settlement areas, such as the Village of Russell, should be the focus of growth and their vitality and regeneration promoted. Section 1.1.3.2 of the PPS directs land use patterns within settlement areas by stating: Land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on: a) Densities and a mix of land uses which: 1. Efficiently use land and resources; 2. Are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available, and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion; 3. Minimize negative impacts to air quality and climate change, and promote energy efficiency; 4. Support active transportation; b) A range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment in accordance with the criteria in policy 1.1.3.3. The PPS also refers to the promotion of opportunities for intensification and compact built form within settlement areas in order to make use of planned and existing services and amenities. It is the role of Planning Authorities to identify lands that are appropriate for intensification and where redevelopment can be accommodated, a process completed through the policies of the Official Plan (section 1.1.3.3). The proposed zoning by-law amendment would allow for intensification in an area and on a lot where municipal water and sewer services are available and which represents an efficient use of land. The proposed apartment dwelling would be within easy walking and cycling distance of the Village Core of Embrun. 6 Page 30 of 72

UNITED COUNTIES OF PRESCOTT AND RUSSELL (UCPR) OFFICIAL PLAN The United Counties of Prescott and Russell Official Plan designates the subject property as Urban Policy Area, a designation that is intend to absorb a significant portion of future growth in the United Counties of Prescott Russell. The urban policy area is intended to provide a range and mix of low, medium and high density housing types to satisfy a broad range of residential requirements and ensure that affordable housing is available. Infill development should also, according the UCPR Official Plan, be in areas with full municipal servicing, designed to be compatible with established communities, and consider the impact of the proposed development in terms of parking, traffic, open spaces and proposed uses. The proposed four unit apartment building would be an increase in density in an established neighbourhood. It is proposed on full municipal services and sufficient reserve capacity in water and waste water facilities exists. The proposed development would add four units to the existing urban fabric, and adequate parking spaces are proposed for each unit. The proposed building is on a major road where the additional traffic will have minimal impact. The proposed dwellings are within walking distance to the Village Core of Embrun. The UCPR Official Plan requires that applications for residential intensification projects be considered based on a number of criteria detailed. The proposed application meets the criteria except as discussed: a) the proposal provide heights, massing and scale appropriate to the site and compatible with adjacent lands; The proposed project is located on the site slightly deeper on the lot from the street than the adjacent two storey dwelling to the west but set back from the daycare to the east. Ideally the proposed building would act as a transition between the two buildings and would have a setback between those of the two adjacent lots. The narrow nature of the lot made in unfeasible to put the parking at the rear of the building. The proposed building is taller than both adjacent buildings. The transition between the proposed three storey residential building and the daycare would be abrupt especially given the reduced lot 7 Page 31 of 72

frontage minimum proposed and the reduce side yard setbacks proposed. b) the proposal provides adequate privacy, sunlight and views of the sky for existing and new residents; The proposed reduced minimum lot frontage and side yard setbacks create privacy concerns between the proposed building and the existing residential and daycare facilities. The increased lot frontage and side yards, over those required by the current Residential One zoning, required for apartment buildings is intended to maintain privacy as height increases. The height and proximity of the building to the lot line may also have an impact on sunlight for existing residents and for the daycare, particularly the area of the play yard immediately adjacent to the reduced minim side yard setback proposed. TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL OFFICIAL PLAN The subject property is designated Residential. Residential policies permit low and medium density housing with densities of up to 42 units/net hectare and low profile and higher density forms for development, 43 units/net hectare and above. The Residential designation permits the development of low-profile apartments and other higher density forms of development provided that they: a) are adjacent or have direct access to a collector road; b) must not result in traffic congestion on local streets; and c) must not adversely affect the amenities of neighbouring residential areas. The proposed development is along a Minor collector, the increased traffic generated by the four proposed residential dwelling units should be minimal. The density of the proposed 4 unit project is 42.98 units/hectare which is in keeping with densities prescribed. The combination of the reduced side yards and minimum lot frontage and the proposed three storey height of the building do cause concern regarding the amenities of the neighbouring properties as the combination will result in reduced privacy, and increased shadowing. The Township Official Plan establishes village design guidelines which apply to lands within the villages. The village design guidelines state that 8 Page 32 of 72

new development should be oriented towards the street with parking generally provided at the rear or side of the building. The relatively narrow lot frontage makes it difficult to configure a higher density residential building with parking on the lot where the parking is behind the building. The original proposed project had this configuration, however, access to the rear parking lot was only 3.310 m wide, inadequate for the two way car traffic that it would be required to accommodate. The current configuration is much more functional for the site. The Township Official Plan highlights the need for land use compatibility, particularly through intensification projects. The proposed project is assessed based on the compatibility criteria outlined in the Official Plan and meets the compatibility criteria except in two areas: Height and massing: the height of the proposed building and massing does not create the transition that is preferable as it is one storey taller than the adjacent residential and two storeys taller than the adjacent daycare and facing residential dwellings. The proposed building is also setback further on the lot than the two adjacent buildings due to the proposed parking. Shadowing: The proposed development may create additional shadows due to the reduced side yard setbacks, the reduced lot frontage and the height of the building. TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL ZONING BY-LAW The subject property is zoned Residential One (R1). The proposed amendment is to change the zoning of the lot (shown on Map 1) from Residential One (R1) to Residential Three (R3) in order to permit the proposed three storey four unit building. The Zoning By-law #46-2011 provisions for the Residential Three zone (R3) are compared with the proposed project below. TABLE 1: ZONE REQUIREMENTS ZONING MECHANISM REQUIRED PROVIDED Notes Lot Area (minimum) 115.0 sq.m. per 882.43 sq.m. dwelling unit = 460 sq.m. Lot Frontage (minimum) 20 m 14.521 m A subject of this application Front Yard Setback 6 m 27.481 m (minimum) Interior Side Yard Setback (minimum) 6 m 3.8 m & 3.041 m A subject of this application 9 Page 33 of 72

Rear Yard Setback (minimum) 7.5 m 17.303 m Landscaped Open Space 35% 35.5% (minimum) Lot Coverage (maximum) 35% 14.85 % Dwellings per lot (maximum) 1 1 Amenity Area (minimum) 20 sq. m per 80 sq. m. dwelling unit = 80 sq. m. Parking (minimum) 4 7 Barrier-free parking 1 1 (minimum) Visitors parking (minimum) 1 1 Note that the applicability of Official Plan section 3.24.2 Use of undersized lots was considered but does not apply in this case as only undersized lots may be used for a purpose permitted in the zone which it is located provided all other applicable provisions in the by-law are met. Therefore the zoning by-law amendment must include the reduced lot frontage despite being na existing lot. FIGURE 1: SKETCH OF PROPOSED MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 10 Page 34 of 72

FIGURE 2: FONT ELEVATION WITH EXISTING RESIDENTIAL SHOWN DISCUSSION The proposed four unit apartment building conforms to most provisions of the zoning requirements of the Residential Three (R3) zone. A reduction in the minimum lot frontage and to the minimum side yards is required to accommodate the proposal. The zoning amendment and proposed four unit apartment dwelling is in keeping with the United Counties of Prescott-Russell Official Plan in that intensification in urban areas. The proposed project is not in keeping with all of the measures that should be considered when determining the appropriateness of a proposed intensification project, particularly the building massing does not create a good transition between the existing building setbacks and creates an abrupt transition between the proposed three storey building and the existing one storey daycare building. The proposed reduce minimum lot frontage reduction and side yard setback reduction reduce the distance between the existing and proposed buildings which will increase shadow impacts and make the transition seem more abrupt. The project would also be in keeping with the intent of the Township of Russell Official Plan which has as visions the promotion of healthy communities through the encouragement of land-use patterns which support non-motorized movement. The proposed four unit apartment dwelling is permitted under the Residential designation the site holds. The proposed three storey building, based on the design principles set out in 11 Page 35 of 72

the Official Plan, meets most of the design principles except those regarding building height and massing, privacy and shadows. The proposed project is in line with Provincial Policies as set out in the Provincial Policy Statement including intensification and compact land-use patterns that support active transportation. The lot is located approximately 400 m from lots zoned Village Core in Embrun, and within walking distance to more than one park. Increased density at this location is in keeping with the PPS, the UCPR Official Plan, and the Township of Russell Official Plan. The proposed height and massing are not ideal for the site given the considerations and design principles for intensification set out in the United Counties of Prescott- Russell Official Plan and the Township of Russell Official Plan. The proposed project should have minimal impact on traffic as it is adding only four units on a minor collector. The proposed zoning amendment from R1 to R3 with exceptions permitting the minimum lot frontage to be 14.5 m and minimum interior side yards of 3 m should be approved with an additional exception limiting the height to two storeys. This would reduce the issues identified around building height, massing, privacy, shadows and the transition between the three storey building and the adjacent and facing existing one and one and a half storey buildings. CONSULTATION The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment was circulated internally within the Township of Russell and to external agencies for comment. Responses received are attached. A summary of comments received is provided below: Rogers Cablesystems (Joan Zacharias) Enbridge Gas Distribution (Allison Sadler) Rogers Communications Canada Inc. has no concerns or objections in regards to the attached circulation. Application was reviewed and there were no objections. 12 Page 36 of 72

United Counties of Prescott and Russell (Sylvain Boudreault) Canada Post (André Rochon) Bell Canada South Nation Conservation Authority (Benoit Duquette) Hydro One Networks Inc. Embrun Hydro Cooperative Eastern Ontario Health Unit (Sylvain Diotte) Russell Fire Department (Bruce Armstrong/Brian Duhamel) Township of Russell Building Services (Julia Tuff) Township of Russell Public Safety and Enforcement (Millie Bourdeau) Le département des Travaux publics exige les conditions suivantes : 1. Permis d entrée est requis 2. Le trottoir devra être réaménagé à l endroit où est proposée la nouvelle entrée (depressed sidewalk). 3. Plan de gestion d eau pluviale (stormwater management plan) à être révisé par les CUPR. 4. L eau de surface sur le site affecté ne doit pas drainer vers le chemin de comté. SWM Report (including Lot Grading & Drainage Plan and Erosion & Sediment Control Plan) should be submitted if Site Plan Control is required for this development. 13 Page 37 of 72

Township of Russell Public Works (Jonathan Bourgon) Township of Russell Corporate Services (Jean Leduc) Township of Russell Finance (Richard Godin) Township of Russell Recreation (Céline Guitard) AED Engineering Consultants (Andre Desjardins) Township of Russell Utilities (Craig Cullen) Township of Russell Asset Management (Salvator Simbaryoheye) Have no problem with the zoning change except to reduce the side yard to 2.3m. I have some concern mostly because of the day care next door. All other concern will be addressed at site plan review. (Note the original application had only a 2.3m side yard instead of the now proposed) Application was reviewed and there were no comments. OTHER OPTION(S) TO THE RECOMMENDATION Not approve the proposed amendment or approve without the recommended additional exception. AUTRES OPTION(S) À LA RECOMMANDATION Ne pas approuver la modification proposée ATTACHMENT(S) PIÈCE(S) JOINTE(S) N/A S. O. 14 Page 38 of 72

6.c REPORT TO PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE RAPPORT AU COMITÉ CONSULTATIF SUR L AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE PD-31-2016 DATE: May 30 mai 2016 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT LOTS 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 & 74, PLAN 50M-313 MODIFICATION AU RÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE LOTS 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 & 74, PLAN 50M-313 SUBJECT Zoning By-law Amendment Properties owned by 2035382 Ontario Inc. (Jocelyn Cayer) legally described as Lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 & 74, Plan 50M-313 known as 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 & 269 Belfort Street, Village of Embrun. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends the approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted 2035382 Ontario Inc. for properties legally described as Lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 & 74, Plan 50M-313 known as 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 & 269 Belfort Street, Embrun from Residential Two (R2) to Residential Two Exception XX (R2-XX) in order to increase the maximum lot coverage SUJET Demande de changement de zonage 2035382 Ontario Inc. (Jocelyn Cayer) propriétaire des propriétés légalement décrites comme étant les lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 et 74, sur le plan 50M313 et connues sous les adresses civiques 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 et 269, rue Belfort dans le village d Embrun. RECOMMANDATION Le département d urbanisme recommande l approbation de la modification au règlement de zonage soumise par 2035382 Ontario inc. (Jocelyn Cayer) propriétaire d une propriété légalement décrite comme étant les lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 et 74, sur le plan 50M313 et connue sous les adresses civiques 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 et 269, rue Belfort dans le village d Embrun, de «résidentielle Page 39 of 72

to 47% from 40%. deux (R2)» à «résidentielle deux exception XX (R2-XX)» afin de permettre une superficie maximale couverte du lot de 40 % à 47 %. FINANCIAL IMPLICATION IMPLICATIONS FINANCIÈRES N/A s. o. BUSINESS PLAN PLAN D AFFAIRES N/A s. o. COMMUNICATION PLAN Notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the property and sent by mail to all property owners within 120 metres of the subject property on May 10, 2016. A public meeting was held on May 30, 2016 at 7 p.m. at the Gaston Patenaude Hall. Notice of the decision within 15 days to all property owners within 120 m and anyone requesting in writing to be notified of the decision. PREPARED BY PRÉPARÉ PAR: PLAN DE COMMUNICATION Le 10 mai 2016, un avis concernant l amendement proposé a été installé sur la propriété et a été envoyé par courrier à tous les propriétaires à l intérieur de 120 mètres de la propriété en question. Une réunion publique a eu lieu le 30 mai 2016 à 19 h dans la salle Gaston Patenaude. Un avis de décision sera envoyé dans un délai de 15 jours à tous les propriétaires d une zone de 120 mètres de la propriété en question et à tous ceux et celles qui ont fait la demande par écrit d être avisés de la décision. Claire Roy, Planning Technician/Technicienne en urbanisme APPROVAL(S) APPROBATION(S): Dominique Tremblay, Planning Director Date: Date: May 30 mai 2016 May 30 mai 2016 Page 40 of 72

PROJECT DESCRIPTION DU PROJET HISTORY, REFERENCE AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION Robert Bourdeau the authorized agent for 2035382 Ontario Inc. has submitted a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for properties described above, situated on Belfort Street in the Village of Embrun. The properties are currently vacant located within an approved Plan of Subdivision inside the boundaries of the Village of Embrun. The properties were part of a Plan of Subdivision (File No. 080-S-10-001) which received draft approval from the United Counties of Prescott and Russell in 2010. The draft Subdivision Plan was approved with primarily detached and semi-detached dwellings. The proposed Zoning by-law amendment would change the zoning of six (6) lots legally described as Lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 & 74, Plan 50M-313 known as 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 & 269 Belfort Street, Embrun to allow the reduction of the maximum lot coverage requirement for the Residential Two (R2) in order to increase the permitted maximum lot coverage from 40% to 47%. HISTORIQUE, RÉFÉRENCE ET INFORMATION DE SUPPORT Robert Bourdeau, l agent autorisé pour 2035382 Ontario Inc., a soumis une demande de modification au règlement de zonage pour les propriétés décrites ci-dessus, situées sur la rue Belfort dans le village d Embrun. Les propriétés sont présentement des terrains vacants situés dans un lotissement approuvé dans les limites du village Les propriétés font parties d un plan de lotissement (dossier no. 080-S-10-001) dont l ébauche a été approuvée en 2010 par les comtés unis de Prescott et Russell. Le projet de plan de lotissement a été approuvé avec principalement des habitations isolées et des habitations jumelées. Le changement proposé au règlement de zonage changerait le zonage de six (6) lots décrits légalement comme les lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 et 74, sur le plan 50M313 et connus sous les adresses civiques 237, 239, 249, 251, 253, 255, 259, 261, 263, 265, 267 et 269, rue Belfort dans le village d Embrun, afin de permettre l augmentation de la superficie maximale couverte du lot dans une Page 41 of 72

«zone résidentielle deux (R2)» de 40 % à 47 %. The application is to allow a maximum lot coverage of 47% requirement, whereas the by-law requires a maximum of 40% in order to permit the construction of semi-detached dwellings on lots having a total area of approximately 670 square metres. The proposed amendment is to accommodate the current house market development demand for larger semi-detached dwellings. The proposed one-storey semi-detached dwellings would cover between 1,103 square metres and 2,300 square metres. La demande est pour permettre une superficie maximale couverte du lot de 47 %, alors que le règlement exige un maximum de 40 % afin de permettre la construction d habitations jumelées sur des lots ayant une superficie totale d approximativement de 670 mètres carrés. Le changement proposé est pour accommoder la demande de développement du marché actuelle pour des habitations jumelées plus grandes. Les habitations jumelées proposées d un étage couvriraient entre 1 103 mètres carrés et 2 300 mètres carrés. Page 42 of 72

MAP AND PICTURE(S) OF THE PROPERTY CARTE ET PHOTO(S) DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ Location Map Carte de localisation Subject Properties: Lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 & 74, Plan 50M- 313 Propriétés en question : Lots 67, 70, 71, 72, 73 & 74, Plan 50M- 313 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT (2014) The Provincial Policy Statement provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to all land use planning and development within Ontario. The Village of Embrun is designated as a Settlement Area and therefore the policies of Section 1.1.3 are relevant. Specifically, the following: Settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted. Land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on: o Densities and a mix of land uses which: Efficiently use land and resources; Are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available, and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion; and, Support active transportation; New development taking place in designated growth areas should occur adjacent to the existing built-up area and shall have a compact Page 43 of 72

form, mix of uses and densities that allow for the efficient use of land, infrastructure and public service facilities. Planning authorities shall provide for an appropriate range of housing types and densities to meet projected requirements of current and future residents of the regional market area by: o Directing the development of new housing towards locations where appropriate levels of infrastructure and public service facilities are or will be available to support current and projected needs; o Promoting densities for new housing which efficiently uses land, resources, and infrastructure and public service facilities. Appropriate development standards should be promoted which facilitate intensification, redevelopment and compact form, while maintaining appropriate levels of avoiding or mitigating risks to public health and safety. Planning authorities shall identify appropriate locations and promote opportunities for intensification and redevelopment where this can be accommodated taking into account existing building stock or areas, including brownfield sites, and the availability of suitable existing or planned infrastructure and public service facilities required to accommodate projected needs. New development taking place in designated growth areas should occur adjacent to the existing built-up area and shall have a compact form, mix of uses and densities that allow for the efficient use of land, infrastructure and public service facilities. Planning authorities shall provide for an appropriate range and mix of housing types and densities to meet projected requirements of current and future residents of the regional market area by: o all forms of residential intensification o directing the development of new housing towards locations where appropriate levels of infrastructure and public service facilities are or will be available to support current and projected needs; UNITED COUNTIES OF PRESCOTT AND RUSSELL (UCPR) OFFICIAL PLAN The United Counties of Prescott and Russell Official Plan designates the subject property as Urban Policy Area, a designation with broad residential policies aimed at ensuring an adequate supply of residential Page 44 of 72

land, a range of housing densities, and that the necessary infrastructure is in place for development. TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL OFFICIAL PLAN The role of the Township Official Plan is to guide and direct the use of land within the Township s four villages. The lands which are the subject of this amendment are part of a subdivision which has already received draft approval. The proposed amendment to the Zoning By-law will change the zoning of parcels of land which were designated for higher density uses in the draft plan to achieve the target densities of the Official Plan (as specified in section 3.4.1). The policies of section 3.4.1 also encourage a mix of unit types within new development areas including detached and semi-detached dwellings, as well as row houses and low-rise apartment buildings where appropriate. The lands affected by the proposed amendment are designated Residential in the Township of Russell 2010 Official Plan. The policies for the Residential land use designation state that permitted uses include primarily low and medium density housing forms (up to 42 units/net hectare). Low-profile apartment buildings and other higher density forms of development (defined as 43 units/net hectare and above) are permitted in certain locations along major streets and where their impact on the surrounding community will be minimized (generally on the outskirts of the community). TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL ZONING BY-LAW The subject properties are currently zoned Residential Two (R2) which permits detached dwellings, and mostly semi-detached dwellings. The applicant is seeking to amend the zoning from Residential Two (R2) to Residential Two Exception XX (R2-XX) in order to permit the development of the proposed semi-detached dwellings with an increased maximum lot coverage from 40% to 47%. Depending on the house model chosen by the future owner, the lot coverage will vary and may not be the maximum lot coverage on every lot. The Zoning By-law # 46-2011 defines lot coverage as: Page 45 of 72

Lot Coverage shall mean the percentage of the lot area covered by all buildings and structures above ground level, including accessory buildings, provided that the area of buildings shall be measured to the exterior of the outside walls, and shall not include permitted projections. The proposed semi-detached dwellings are permitted on the property and all other aspects of the R2 zone requirements are met. CONSULTATION The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment was circulated internally within the Township of Russell and to external agencies for comments. Comments received are summarized below. Rogers Cablesystems (Joan Zacharias) Enbridge Gas Distribution (Suzanne Renaud) United Counties of Prescott and Russell (Sylvain Boudreault) Canada Post (André Rochon) Bell Canada South Nation Conservation Authority (Benoit Duquette) Hydro One Networks Inc. Eastern Ontario Health Unit (Sylvain Diotte) Russell Fire Department (Bruce Armstrong/Brian Duhamel) Township of Russell Building Services (Julia Tuff) Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. My comments for this application are that the designer will need to ensure that with the great lot coverage they will still meet the requirements for unprotected openings and limiting distances in the building code. Page 46 of 72

Township of Russell Public Safety and Enforcement (Millie Bourdeau) Township of Russell Public Works (Jonathan Bourgon) Township of Russell Corporate Services (Jean Leduc) Township of Russell Finance (Richard Godin) Township of Russell Recreation (Céline Guitard) AED Engineering Consultants (Andre Desjardins) Township of Russell Utilities (Craig Cullen) Township of Russell Asset Management (Salvator Simbaryoheye) Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. PLANNING DEPARTMENT COMMENTS The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is consistent with the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement, the Official Plans of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell and of the Township of Russell. The Provincial Policy Statement and Official Plans speak to the creation of a range of densities and a mix of housing stock in settlement areas. The proposed amendment will achieve this by providing a different form of housing and a desirable mix of densities in order to efficiently develop this parcel of land in accordance with relevant policy requirements. The increased in the lot coverage provision requirement is not expected to impact on the privacy of the neighbouring properties. The variance will not prevent adjacent properties from continuing to be used for detached or Page 47 of 72

semi-detached dwellings. The lot coverage increase will not impact the density of the proposed project since all other required setbacks meet the Zoning By-Law requirements. The proposed development of the subject properties are appropriate for the area and is desirable in the area. The subject properties are located within a low and medium density residential subdivision containing detached dwellings, townhouses, apartments and semi-detached dwellings. The subject properties are located on Belfort Street which is expected to be developed as semi-detached dwellings on both side of the street. The proposed semi-detached dwellings are desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The size of the proposed semi-detached dwellings will not be disparate from the other semi-detached dwellings built in that subdivision because of the requested increase in lot coverage. It should also be noted that the Township of Russell Zoning By-law # 46-2011 is currently under review and increasing or removing maximum lot coverage provisions for residential lots is being considered. A similar relief from the maximum lot coverage requirement was recently approved through a minor variance application for a similar residential development. OTHER OPTION(S) TO THE RECOMMENDATION 1. ot approve the proposed amendment. AUTRES OPTION(S) À LA RECOMMANDATION 1. e pas approuver la modification proposée. ATTACHMENT(S) n/a s. o. PIÈCE(S) JOINTE(S) Page 48 of 72

6.d REPORT TO PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE RAPPORT AU COMITÉ CONSULTATIF SUR L'AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE PD-30-2016 DATE: May 30 mai 2016 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT LOTS 105, 106 & 107, PLAN 50M-320 MODIFICATION AU RÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE LOTS 105, 106 & 107, PLAN 50M-320 SUBJECT Zoning By-law Amendment Property owned by Mélanie Construction Inc., legally described as Lots 105, 106 and 107 on Plan 50M-320 known as 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 and 224 Capri Avenue, Village of Embrun. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends the approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application submitted by Mélanie Construction Inc., for properties legally described as Lots 105, 106 and 107 on Plan 50M-320 known as 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 and 224 Capri Avenue, Embrun from Residential Two (R2) to Residential Two Exception XX (R2-XX) in order to allow an increased maximum lot coverage from 40% to 47%. SUJET Demande de changement de zonage Mélanie Construction Inc., propriétaire d une propriété légalement décrite comme étant les lots 105, 106 et 107, sur le plan 50M320 et connue sous les adresses civiques 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, av. Capri dans le village d Embrun. RECOMMANDATION Le département d urbanisme recommande l approbation de la modification au règlement de zonage soumise par Mélanie Construction Inc. pour les lots 105, 106 et 107, sur le plan 50M320 et connus sous les adresses civiques 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, av. Capri dans le village d Embrun, de «résidentielle deux (R2)» à «résidentielle deux exception XX (R2-XX)» pour permettre un augmentation de la superficie maximale couverte du lot de 40 % à 47 %. 1 Page 49 of 72

FINANCIAL IMPLICATION IMPLICATIONS FINANCIÈRES N/A s. o. BUSINESS PLAN PLAN D AFFAIRES N/A s. o. COMMUNICATION PLAN Notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the property and sent by mail to all property owners within 120 metres of the subject property on May 10, 2016. A public meeting will be held on May 30, 2016 at 7:00 pm at the Gaston Patenaude Hall. Notice of the decision within 15 days to all property owners within 120 m and anyone requesting in writing to be notified of the decision. PREPARED BY PRÉPARÉ PAR: PLAN DE COMMUNICATION Le 10 mai 2016, un avis concernant l amendement proposé a été installé sur la propriété et a été envoyé par courrier à tous les propriétaires à l intérieur de 120 mètres de la propriété en question. Une réunion publique aura lieu le 30 mai 2016 à 19 h dans la salle Gaston Patenaude. Un avis de décision sera envoyé dans un délai de 15 jours à tous les propriétaires d une zone de 120 mètres de la propriété en question et à tous ceux et celles qui ont fait la demande par écrit d être avisés de la décision. Claire Roy, Planning Technician/Technicienne en urbanisme APPROVAL(S) APPROBATION(S): Dominique Tremblay, Planning Director Date: Date: May 30 mai 2016 May 30 mai 2016 2 Page 50 of 72

PROJECT DESCRIPTION DU PROJET HISTORY, REFERENCE AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION Reynald Patenaude of Mélanie Construction Inc. has submitted a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for properties described above, situated on Capri Avenue in the Village of Embrun. The properties are currently vacant located within an approved Plan of Subdivision inside the boundaries of the Village of Embrun. The properties were part of a Plan of Subdivision (File No. 080-S-11-008) which received draft approval from the United Counties of Prescott and Russell in 2013. The draft Subdivision Plan was approved with primarily detached dwellings, semi-detached, row house, and apartment units. The proposed Zoning by-law amendment would change the zoning of three lots legally described as Lots 105, 106 and 107 on Plan 50M-320 and known as 214, 216, 218, 220, 222 and 224 Capri Avenue in Embrun to allow a relief from the maximum lot coverage requirement for the Residential Two (R2) Zone from 40% to 47%. HISTORIQUE, RÉFÉRENCE ET INFORMATION DE SUPPORT Reynald Patenaude de Mélanie Construction inc. a soumis une demande de modification au règlement de zonage pour la propriété décrite ci-dessus, située sur l avenue Capri dans le village d'embrun. Les propriétés sont présentement des terrains vacants situés dans un lotissement approuvé dans les limites du village Les propriétés font parties d un lotissement (dossier no. 080-S-11-008) dont l ébauche a été approuvée en 2013 par les comtés unis de Prescott et Russell. Le projet de plan de lotissement a été approuvé avec principalement des habitations isolées, des habitations jumelées, des habitations en rangées et des immeubles d appartements. Le changement proposé au règlement de zonage changerait le zonage de trois lots décrits légalement comme les lots 105, 106 et 107, sur le plan 50M-320 et connus sous les adresses civiques 214, 216, 218, 220, 222, 224, av. Capri dans le village d Embrun afin de permettre le soulagement de l exigence de la superficie maximale couverte du lot dans une «zone résidentielle deux (R2)» de 3 Page 51 of 72

40% à 47%. The application is to allow a maximum lot coverage of 47% requirement, whereas the by-law requires a maximum of 40% in order to permit the construction of semi-detached dwellings on lots having a total area of 703.5 square metres. The proposed amendment is to accommodate the current house market development demand for larger semi-detached dwellings. The proposed one-storey and two-storey semi-detached dwellings would cover between 1,200 square metres and 1,350 square metres. La demande est pour permettre une superficie maximale couverte du lot de 47 %, alors que le règlement exige un maximum de 40 % afin de permettre la construction d habitations jumelées sur des lots ayant une superficie totale de 703,5 mètres carrés. Le changement proposé est pour accommoder la demande de développement du marché actuelle pour des habitations jumelées plus grandes. Les habitations jumelées proposées d'un étage et deux étages couvriraient entre 1 200 mètres carrés et 1,350 mètres carré. 4 Page 52 of 72

MAP AND PICTURE(S) OF THE PROPERTY CARTE ET PHOTO(S) DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ Location Map Carte de localisation Subject Properties: Lots 105, 106 & 107, Plan 50M-320 Propriétés en question : Lots 105, 106 & 107, Plan 50M-320 PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT (2014) The Provincial Policy Statement provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to all land use planning and development within Ontario. The Village of Embrun is designated as a Settlement Area and therefore the policies of Section 1.1.3 are relevant. Specifically, the following: Settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted. Land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on: o Densities and a mix of land uses which: Efficiently use land and resources; Are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available, and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion; and, Support active transportation; New development taking place in designated growth areas should occur adjacent to the existing built-up area and shall have a compact 5 Page 53 of 72

land, a range of housing densities, and that the necessary infrastructure is in place for development. TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL OFFICIAL PLAN The role of the Township Official Plan is to guide and direct the use of land within the Township s four villages. The lands which are the subject of this amendment are part of a subdivision which has already received draft approval. The proposed amendment to the Zoning By-law will change the zoning of parcels of land which were designated for higher density uses in the draft plan to achieve the target densities of the Official Plan (as specified in section 3.4.1). The policies of section 3.4.1 also encourage a mix of unit types within new development areas including detached and semi-detached dwellings, as well as row houses and low-rise apartment buildings where appropriate. The lands affected by the proposed amendment are designated Residential in the Township of Russell 2010 Official Plan. The policies for the Residential land use designation state that permitted uses include primarily low and medium density housing forms (up to 42 units/net hectare). Low-profile apartment buildings and other higher density forms of development (defined as 43 units/net hectare and above) are permitted in certain locations along major streets and where their impact on the surrounding community will be minimized (generally on the outskirts of the community). TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL ZONING BY-LAW The subject properties are currently zoned Residential Two (R2) which permits detached dwellings, and mostly semi-detached dwellings. The applicant is seeking to amend the zoning from Residential Two (R2) to Residential Two Exception XX (R2-XX) in order to permit the development of the proposed semi-detached dwellings with an increased maximum lot coverage from 40% to 47%. The Zoning By-law # 46-2011 defines lot coverage as: Lot Coverage shall mean the percentage of the lot area covered by all buildings and structures above ground level, including accessory buildings, 7 Page 55 of 72

provided that the area of buildings shall be measured to the exterior of the outside walls, and shall not include permitted projections. The proposed semi-detached dwellings are permitted on the property and all other aspects of the R2 zone requirements are met. CONSULTATION The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment was circulated internally within the Township of Russell and to external agencies for comments. Comments received are summarized below. Rogers Cablesystems (Joan Zacharias) Enbridge Gas Distribution (Suzanne Renaud) United Counties of Prescott and Russell (Sylvain Boudreau) Canada Post (André Rochon) Bell Canada South Nation Conservation Authority (Benoit Duquette) Hydro One Networks Inc. Eastern Ontario Health Unit (Sylvain Diotte) Russell Fire Department (Bruce Armstrong/Brian Duhamel) Township of Russell Building Services (Julia Tuff) Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. Application was reviewed and there were no comments. My comments for this application are that the designer will need to ensure that with the greater lot coverage they will still meet the requirements for unprotected openings and limiting distances in the building code. 8 Page 56 of 72

semi-detached dwellings. The lot coverage increase will not impact the density of the proposed project since all other required setbacks meet the Zoning By-Law requirements. The proposed development of the subject property is appropriate for the area and is desirable in the area. The subject property is located within a low and medium density residential subdivision containing detached dwellings, townhouses, apartments and semi-detached dwellings. The subject properties are located on Capri Avenue which is expected to be developed as semi-detached dwellings on the west side and detached dwelling east side of the street. The subject property backs onto lots that are being built or are planned as townhouse blocks. The proposed semidetached dwellings are desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The size of the proposed semi-detached dwellings will not be disparate from the other semi-detached dwellings built in that subdivision because of the requested increase in lot coverage. It should also be noted that the Township of Russell Zoning By-law # 46-2011is currently under review and increasing or removing maximum lot coverage provisions for residential lots is being considered. A similar relief from the maximum lot coverage requirement was recently approved through a minor variance application for Lot 108, Plan 50M-320 located north of the subject properties. The proposed semi-detached dwellings are permitted on the property and all other aspects of the R2 zone requirements are met. OTHER OPTION(S) TO THE RECOMMENDATION 1. ot approve the proposed amendment. AUTRES OPTION(S) À LA RECOMMANDATION 1. e pas approuver la modification proposée. ATTACHMENT(S) n/a s. o. PIÈCE(S) JOINTE(S) 10 Page 58 of 72

Page 59 of 72 11

6. e. REPORT TO PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE RAPPORT AU COMITÉ CONSULTATIF SUR L AMÉNAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE PD-33-2016 DATE: May 30 mai 2016 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT PT LOT 7, CONC. 7, BLOCK 123 ON PLAN 50M-320 MODIFICATION DU RÈGLEMENT DE ZONAGE PT LOT 7, CONC. 7, BLOCK 123 SUR PLAN 50M-320 SUBJECT Zoning By-law Amendment Property owned by Devcore Construction (Ontario) Inc. and legally described as being Part of Lot 7, Concession 7 being Block 123 on Plan 50M-320. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends the approval of the zoning amendments application submitted by Michael Falardeau, agent for Devcore Construction (Ontario) Inc., for the following: 1. That the zoning of the vacant parcel of land legally described as Part of Lot 7, Concession 7 being Block 123 on Plan 50M-320 (shown on Map 1) be amended from Residential Three (R3) to Residential Three - Exception XX (R3-XX) in order to permit: a.secondary dwelling units in the end units of the SUJET Demande de changement de zonage propriétaire Devcore Construction (Ontario) inc. pour la propriété décrite légalement comme étant une partie du lot 7, concession 7 étant le bloc 123 sur le plan 50M- 320. RECOMMANDATION Le département d urbanisme recommande l approbation des modifications au règlement de zonage soumis par Michael Falardeau, agent pour Devcore Construction (Ontario) inc., pour : 2. ue le zonage de la parcelle de terrain vacante légalement décrite comme étant une partie du lot 7, concession 7, bloc 123 sur le plan 50M-320 (démontré sur la carte 1) soit modifié de «zone résidentielle trois (R3)» à «zone résidentielle trois - exception XX (R3-XX)» pour permettre : a. 1 Page 60 of 72

proposed row house building and to permit a reduced landscaped open space minimum of 29% from 30%. b.the projection of the rear deck to the lot line for the two middle units abutting each other and that no additional public consutlation is required. b. es unités secondaires d habitation dans les deux unités externes des maisons en rangée proposée et pour permettre la réduction d espaces verts paysagés minimale de 30 % à 29 %. a projection de la terrasse localisée à l arrière, à la ligne de lot pour les deux unités intérieures et qu aucune autre consultation publique ne soit nécessaire. FINANCIAL IMPLICATION IMPLICATIONS FINANCIÈRES N/A s. o. BUSINESS PLAN N/A PLAN D AFFAIRE s. o. STRATEGIC PLAN N/A COMMUNICATION PLAN Notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the property and sent by ordinary mail to all property owners within 120 metres of the subject property on May 10, 2016. A public meeting was held on May 30, 2016 at 7:00 pm at the Gaston Patenaude Hall. Notice of the decision will be sent within 15 days to anyone requesting in writing to be notified of the decision. PLAN STRATÉGIQUE s. o. PLAN DE COMMUNICATION Le 10 mai 2016, un avis concernant l amendement proposé a été installé sur la propriété et a été envoyé par courrier ordinaire à tous les propriétaires dans une zone de 120 mètres de la propriété en question. Une réunion publique a eu lieu le 30 mai 2015 à 19 h dans la salle Gaston Patenaude. Un avis de décision sera envoyé dans un délai de 15 jours à tous les propriétaires dans une zone de 120 mètres de la propriété en question et à tous ceux et celles qui ont fait la demande par écrit d être avisés de la décision. 2 Page 61 of 72

PROJECT DESCRIPTION DU PROJET HISTORY Michael Falardeau, authorized agent, has submitted an application for zoning amendment for the property legally described as Part of Lot 7 Concession 7 being Block 123 on Plan 50M-320. The property is part of a subdivision plan (File #080-S-11-008) for which a subdivision agreement was signed September 24, 2016. Subdivision construction is currently underway and includes detached, semidetached, row house and apartment dwellings. The subdivision provides different types of housing stock and a mix of densities that are required by the relevant planning documents. The requested Zoning By-law amendment would permit secondary dwelling units in the two end units of the four (4) unit block and reduce the minimum required landscaped open space from 30% to 29%. HISTORIQUE Michael Falardeau, agent autorisé, a présenté une demande de modification de zonage de la propriété décrite légalement comme étant une partie du lot 7, concession 7 étant le bloc 123 sur le plan 50M-320. La propriété fait partie d'un plan de lotissement (dossier n o 080-S-11-008) pour laquelle une entente de lotissement a été signé le 24 septembre 2016. La construction du lotissement est en cours et comprend des habitations isolées, jumelées, en rangée et des immeubles d'habitations. La subdivision offre différents types d habitations et un mélange de densités qui sont requis par les documents d urbanisme pertinents. La modification au règlement de zonage demandée permettrait des unités secondaires localisées aux extrémités du bloc de quatre (4) unités et permettrait la réduction d'espaces verts paysagers minimale de 30 % à 29 %. 4 Page 63 of 72

MAP AND PICTURE(S) OF THE PROPERTY CARTE ET PHOTO(S) DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ Location Map Carte de localisation 120-126 St- Malo Place 120-126 Place St-Malo 5 Page 64 of 72

Map 2 Subdivision Plan 50M-320 DISCUSSION PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT (2014) The Provincial Policy Statement section 1.4.3. states that: planning authorities shall provide for an appropriate range and mix of housing types and densities to meet projected requirements of current and future residents of the regional market area by: b) Permitting and facilitating: 2. All forms of residential intensification, including second units, and redevelopment in accordance with policy 1.1.3.3; The Provincial Policy Statement states that settlement areas, such as the Village of Embrun, should be the focus of growth. 6 Page 65 of 72

Section 1.1.3.2 of the PPS directs land use patterns within settlement areas by stating: Land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on: a) Densities and a mix of land uses which: 1. Efficiently use land and resources b) A range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment in accordance with the criteria in policy 1.1.3.3. The PPS also refers to the promotion of opportunities for intensification and compact built form within settlement areas in order to make use of planned and existing services and amenities. It is the role of Planning Authorities to identify lands that are appropriate for intensification and redevelopment can be accommodated, a process completed through the policies of the Official Plan (section 1.1.3.3). The proposed zoning by-law amendment would allow for intensification in an area and on a lot where municipal water and sewer services are available and which represents an efficient use of land. The proposed semi-detached dwelling would be within the urban settlement area defined by the United Counties of Prescott-Russell Official Plan and the Township of Russell Official Plan. PLANNING ACT The Planning Act section 16(3) states an official plan shall contain policies that authorize the use of a second residential unit by authorizing, (a) The use of two residential units in a detached house, semi-detached house or rowhouse if no building or structure ancillary to the detached house, semi-detached house or rowhouse contains a residential unit; and (b)the use of a residential unit in a building or structure ancillary to a detached house, semi-detached house or rowhouse contains a single residential unit. Currently the Township of Russell Zoning By-law and Official Plan do not permit secondary dwellings in or on the property of rowhouses. The current Official Plan review and Zoning by-law review will need to reflect the requirement in the Planning Act to permit secondary dwelling units in rowhouse dwellings. 7 Page 66 of 72

The Planning Act section 17(24.1) no appeal re second unit policies permits no appeal in respect of the policies described in subsection 16(3), including for greater certainty, any requirements or standards that are part of such policies. UNITED COUNTIES OF PRESCOTT AND RUSSELL (UCPR) OFFICIAL PLAN The United Counties of Prescott and Russell Official Plan designates the subject property as Urban Policy Area, a designation that is intend to absorb a significant portion of future growth in the United Counties of Prescott Russell. The urban policy area is intended to provide a range and mix of low, medium and high density housing types to satisfy a broad range of residential requirements and ensure that affordable housing is available. The proposed rowhouse dwellings with secondary dwelling units would be a slight increase in density and would offer a broader range of residential unit types in this developing community. The units are proposed on full municipal services and sufficient reserve capacity in water and waste water facilities exists. It is a policy of the UCPR Official Plan (section 7.6.3) to provide opportunities for and encourage accessory dwelling units, such as apartments, in detached, semi-detached and rowhouse dwellings as long as the proponent can demonstrate compliance with the Ontario building code. TOWNSHIP OF RUSSELL ZONING BY-LAW The subject property is zoned Residential Three (R3). The proposed amendment is to change the zoning of the lot (shown on Map 1) from Residential Three (R3) to Residential Three Exception XX (R3-XX) in order to permit the proposed secondary dwelling units in the end rowhouse units and to permit a minimum landscaped open space area of 29% instead of 30%. The Zoning By-law #46-2011 provisions for the Residential Three zone (R3) do not currently permit secondary suites. The provisions for secondary 8 Page 67 of 72

dwelling units do not currently permit secondary dwelling units in rowhouses. The provisions for the Residential Thee (R3) zone are compared with the proposed project below. TABLE 1: ZONE REQUIREMENTS ZONING MECHANISM REQUIRED PROVIDED Lot Area (minimum) 185 sq.m. per dwelling unit = 740 sq.m. 20 m 2280.5 sq.m. 60% of lot frontage = 21.37 m 6m 18.93 m 6m 8.18 m & 10.79 m 7.5 m 9.49 m + 30% 29.4% 75 sq. m. / dwelling More than 75 sq. m. /dwelling provided 10 provided (including garages) Lot Frontage (minimum) Maximum driveway width Front Yard Setback (minimum) Interior Side Yard Setback (minimum) Rear Yard Setback (minimum) Lot Coverage (maximum) Amenity area Parking (minimum) (4 x 1.5) + (1 x 2) = 8 Amendment required 35.62 m 11.46 m + Amend minimum to 29% MAP 3: SKETCH OF PROPOSED SEMI-DETACHED DWELLINGS 9 Page 68 of 72