Demographics Review Multi-family Housing Data & Characteristics. Triplexes, quadplexes, and apartments. Development Potential Future Considerations

Similar documents
Development Plan DP13-3 (Arlington Lofts) Planning and Zoning Meeting Date: Document Being Considered: Ordinance

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

City of Oshkosh Zoning Update

UDO Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 18, 2011

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

Arch-Laclede s Landing Station

Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning

Wednesday, January 4, E CESAR CHAVEZ ST 78702

Article 26 MOBILE/MANUFACTURED /MODULAR HOME AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE REGULATIONS ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 19, 2008 CASE NUMBER: TA ORDINANCE NO.

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-24 Indian Wells Road Properties Town Council Meeting November 20, 2014

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

RESOLUTION NO ( R)

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

Secured Market Rental Housing Policy

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

Town of Clinton, Connecticut Action Plan for the Historic Unilever Property and Area. Steering Committee Meeting #5 Implementation Strategies

Single Family Residential

Unified Development Ordinance. Chamblee Chamber of Commerce Meeting May 21, 2015

RAE EXCLUSIVE RESIDENTIAL ZONE A residential district exclusively for low density single family housing and accessory uses.

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

PETITION # TO AMEND ZONING ORDINANCE TO ALLOW STUDENT HOUSING CREATING A DEFINITION AND ZONES USE WOULD BE ALLOWED IN

Orange Avenue Corridor Study

Outline of Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 Changes

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

CITY PLAN COMMISSION THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2018 Planner: Vasavi Pilla. FILE NUMBER: DCA DATE INITIATED: December 14, 2017

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING

3804 Wilson Boulevard (Staples Site) Special General Land Use Plan Study

Salem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Planning Board Worksession No.4: Parklawn South District and Randolph Hills District

Chapter 2 Land Use. State of Land Use

NW AUBURN NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN BRAGG AVENUE MLK DRIVE

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

CITY OF FATE, TEXAS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE. Article III Zoning Districts

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 21, 2016

M E M O. September 14, 2017 Agenda Item #4. Planning Commission. David Goodison, Planning Director

Rule of corner may need to be flexible i.e. context school, park. With a clustered approach. Should row housing go where fourplexes are?

Incentive Zoning. City Plan Commission September 20, Pam Thompson, Senior Planner, Sustainable Development and Construction

Ch. 14 CAPITOL HILL. Historic Districts - Apartment and Multi-family Development

Duplex and Tandem Development Community Workshop. Presented by: Elisabeth Dang, AICP

Poughkeepsie City Center Revitalization Plan

Housing Study & Needs Assessment

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

Central Corridor Forecasting Methodology

Housing Authority of the City of Tacoma. Request for Proposals: Project-Based Voucher Program AND. Property-Based Subsidies

ZONING CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY SHEET

Memorandum. Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director. November 25, 2015 (for December 3 Study Session)

SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

Town of Waxhaw Board of Commissioners. Waxhaw Police Department Community Meeting Room Tuesday January 12, 2016

Comprehensive Plan 2015 to 2030 STATE OF LAND USE

Introduction. General Development Standards

APPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

PARRAMORE OAKS FRAMEWORK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

City of Dade City, Florida Land Development Regulations ARTICLE 3: ZONE DISTRICTS

NORTHWEST QUADRANT NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

Ashland Transit Triangle:

Planning Act Public Meeting Report

Route 6 Corridor Study Bristol Planning Commission Meeting #1. May 25, 2016 FITZGERALD & HALLIDAY, INC. Innovative Planning, Better Communities

City of Tacoma Zoning Reference Guide

Residential Intensification in Established Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS)

Burquitlam-Lougheed Neighbourhood Plan Market Analysis Findings and Lessons Learned

CHARLOTTE CODE CHAPTER 9: GENERAL DISTRICTS PART 1: TABLE OF USES AND HIERARCHY OF DISTRICTS

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

City of Dade City, Florida Land Development Regulations ARTICLE 3: ZONE DISTRICTS

Marion Johnson with Design & Development Consultants. Divine Grace Church represented by Patricia Owusu-Sampah

Future Land Use Categories & Nodes December 23, Future Land Use Categories

APPENDIX C CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ENERGIZE PHOENIX CORRIDOR

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development. Development Plan & Policies

SECTION 6. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Community Not Commodity September 27, 2017

WESTWOOD MANOR APARTMENTS 1881 ROSEWOOD DRIVE, MANSFIELD, OH 44906

ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS

DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN

Introduction. Charlotte Fagan, Skyler Larrimore, and Niko Martell

Amendments to the Dallas Development Code Creating Regulations for Mixed Income Housing Development Bonuses

Draft Hendersonville Zoning Ordinance SUMMARY

Article Floating Zone Requirements

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS

SHEPHERD COMMUNITY ZONING STUDY SPECIAL STUDY. September 21, Regional Planning Agency

The Metropolitan Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy and the SACOG Region s Housing Market. July 2013

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Master Plan Review SILVER SPRING CBD. Approved and Adopted February Updated January 2013

A. Land Use Relationships

ZONING ORDINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Thursday, September 28, 2017 DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FILE NO. DCA

Please feel free to contact either myself or Kris Sweckard if you have any questions or need additional information.

COMMERCIAL ELEMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT

PEDESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT. November 6, 2013 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department

HEIGHTS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Detroit Inclusionary Housing Plan & Market Study Preliminary Inclusionary Housing Feasibility Study Executive Summary August, 2016

HEIGHTS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PLANNING AND ZONING 101 EDUCATION SESSION

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Transcription:

Horizon Discussion: Arlington 2012 Multi-Family Housing Profile City Council Meeting September 17, 2013 6

Overview Demographics Review Multi-family Housing Data & Characteristics Triplexes, quadplexes, and apartments Development Potential Future Considerations 7

Data Sources U.S. Census, American Community Survey, American Housing Survey, HUD Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD) All multi-family properties 2012 appraised values 10 comparison Tarrant County cities Community Development & Planning Code Compliance Services MPF Research 8

Population 400,000 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 City of Arlington Historic Population 1950-2010 7,692 44,775 89,723 160,123 261,717 332,969 365,438 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010* 9

Population Median Household Income 2000-2010 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 2000 2010 $60,000 $60,304 $52,094 $40,000 $20,000 $0 2010 Constant Dollars 10

Housing Data 120,000 Total Housing by Type, 2008-2013* 100,000 93,782 100,581 80,000 60,000 Single Family Housing Units Multi-Family Housing Units 40,000 50,037 * 44,547* 20,000-2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Q2 2013 11 *Total includes duplexes, triplexes, Quadplexes, and apartments.

Housing Data Apartment Permitting 2008-2012 300 200 176 100 66 0 0 0 0 0-100 -52 New Multi-Family Units Demolished Multi-Family Units -114-200 -192-300 -400-356 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Multi-family properties average 144 units 2.25 persons/household 12

Housing Data In 2012, there were approx. 300 multifamily properties totaling 45,000 units Concentrations of properties: North of I-30 Central Arlington East Arlington 13

Housing Data Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) Voucher total: 3,646 1,080 vouchers associated with single- family and duplex housing 2,566 vouchers associated with multifamily housing 14

Housing Data Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) By Planning Sector Vouchers 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1,638 662 575 406 257 108 Central East North Southeast Southwest West Planning Sector 15

Housing Data The occupancy rate is a measure of the number of individuals living in units at a property. Lowest occupancy rates occur in the areas with the highest concentration of larger scale multi-family properties: North Arlington East Arlington 16

Housing Data 6.0% Change in Occupancy by Quarter, 2007-2012 4.0% Percent Change 2.0% 0.0% -2.0% -4.0% -6.0% -8.0% -10.0% 2007 Q4 2008 Q1 2008 Q2 2008 Q3 2008 Q4 2009 Q1 2009 Q2 2009 Q3 2009 Q4 2010 Q1 Efficiency 2.9% 0.4% -7.7% 1.3% -1.1% 0.1% -0.6% -3.3% 1.8% 1.4% 0.1% 0.9% -1.1% -1.4% 0.0% -1.4% 4.5% -1.3% 2.3% 1.2% -1.6% 1 Bedroom 0.5% -1.0% -2.6% 1.0% -2.2% -0.7% 0.2% -0.2% -1.4% 1.2% 0.3% 0.7% -0.4% 0.7% 0.9% -0.5% 0.8% -0.2% 1.6% 0.0% -0.3% 2 Bedroom 0.5% 0.2% -2.4% 0.5% -2.1% -0.6% 0.6% -0.2% -1.5% 1.2% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 1.0% 0.8% -0.4% 0.6% 0.0% 1.1% 0.3% -0.6% 3 Bedroom 0.0% 1.2% 0.4% -0.4% -1.6% -0.8% 2.4% -3.5% 0.9% 1.6% 1.2% -1.1% 1.1% 0.6% 0.4% 0.3% -1.0% 1.2% 1.0% -0.9% -0.3% 2010 Q2 2010 Q3 2010 Q4 2011 Q1 2011 Q2 2011 Q3 2011 Q4 2012 Q1 2012 Q2 2012 Q3 2012 Q4 17

Housing Data The vacancy rate describes the availability of units for immediate move-in Low vacancy rates mostly occur south of I-30 18

Housing Characteristics The majority of properties were built between 1970 and 1990 The oldest properties are located in East Arlington The most recently developed properties are located in Central Arlington 19

Housing Characteristics While large in size, properties valued at more than $4M only account for 16% of the multi-family stock. Properties with the lowest values are concentrated between I-30 and I-20 20

Housing Characteristics Substantial portion of properties valued < $20 per sqft of living space, concentrated in North Arlington Central Arlington East Arlington 48 properties have improvements appraised at >$50 per sqft 21

Housing Characteristics Average Total Value per Living Area Square Footage $80.00 $70.00 $60.00 $50.00 $40.00 $38.29 $30.00 $20.00 $10.00 $- All renter-occupied properties regardless of type 22

Housing Characteristics Square Footage of Multi-Family Living Area Per 1,000 Persons 250,000 200,000 150,000 108,516 100,000 50,000 - All renter-occupied properties regardless of type 23

Housing Characteristics Median Contract Rent, 2011 $1,000 $900 $800 $700 $657 $600 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $0 All renter-occupied properties regardless of type 24

Housing Development Potential Land Use Summary Approx. 11,200 acres of vacant land zoned for future use Significant developable acreage in non-residential zones Vacant Developable Parcels by Zoning District Zoning District Numer of Parcels Total Acreage Percent of Total A - Agricultural 217 1,595.8 14.3% B - Business 126 782.3 7.0% CS - Community Service 308 1,047.5 9.4% D - Duplex 142 150.7 1.3% DB - Downtown Business 35 26.7 0.2% E - Estate 35 85.3 0.8% ETJ - Extra Territorial Jurisdiction 1 0.2 0.0% F - Festival 24 56.2 0.5% IM - Industrial Manufacturing 177 1,200.1 10.7% LI - Light Industrial 77 210.0 1.9% LS - Local Service 2 5.5 0.0% MF14 - Medium Density Multi-Family 15 136.2 1.2% MF18 - Medium Density Multi-Family 75 123.7 1.1% MF22 - High Density Multi-Family 53 132.2 1.2% MH - Manufactured Housing 1 3.8 0.0% NS - Neighborhood Service 37 115.1 1.0% O - Office 121 562.6 5.0% PD - Planned Development 1,111 4,071.1 36.4% R - Residential 847 818.6 7.3% R1 - Residential 37 19.5 0.2% R2 - Residential 141 46.7 0.4% TH - Townhouse 12 5.7 0.1% UTA 3 0.6 0.0% Total 3,598 11,196.0 100.0% 25

Housing Development Potential Number New Unit of Count Parcels (Estimate) Total Acreage Percent of Total Zoning District MF14 -Medium Density Multi-Family 15 1,904 136 31.26% MF18 -Medium Density Multi-Family 75 1,897 124 28.51% MF22 -Medium Density Multi-Family 53 2,471 132 30.34% PD -Planned Development 10 1,087 43 9.89% Total 153 7,359 435 100.00% Nearly 450 acres available for MF development* MF14 is the largest category which allows a maximum of 14 units per acre *Total excludes a 51 acre MF14 parcel slated for rezoning. 26

Housing Development Potential Potential for large population growth associated with MF development is near the City s edges along highway corridors There is limited growth potential throughout the rest of the City 27

MULTI-FAMILYDEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: BASE ZONING DISTRICTS MF14 Multifamily 14 DUA MF18 Multifamily 18 DUA MF22 Multifamily 22 DUA MU* Mixed Use DB Downtown Business ED-F Festival PD** Planned Development What is allowed? Multi-family at a maximumof 14 units per acre ; must follow guidelines for Final Development Plan Multi-family at a maximumof 18 units per acre; must follow guidelines for Final Development Plan Multi-family at a maximumof 22 units per acre; must follow guidelines for Final Development Plan Multi-family at a maximum of 100 units per acre with certain conditions (as part of a mixed-use development with design standards). MU zoning is intended for target areas of Downtown. Multi-family at a maximum of 32 units per acre, must follow MU design standards Multi-family allowed with SUP;SUP governs density Usesare identified and approved as part of the PD approval process; density based on the base district chosen, can be applied anywhere in city in any overlay What is the development process? Must submit Final Development Plan which is approved by P&Z/CC (since May 2003) Must obtain SUP,Must submit Final Development Plan which is approved by P&Z/CC Must submit zoning application for PD along with Final Development Plan, both of which are reviewed and approved by P&Z/Council What design standards apply? Final Development Plan includes review of: lot coverage and setbacks, height restrictions, landscaping, screening, minimum living area, building scale and architecture, signs, parking, open space, residential adjacency considerations, roof pitch, utilities, enhanced entrances, lighting, disposal, fencing, exterior materials, crime prevention, nonsmoking areas, on site management, orientation and clustering, natural features, circulation, pathways, tenant services, recreational facilities, laundry *Mixed Use District Design Standards regulate the following: minimum and maximum setbacks, encroachments into setbacks, maximum density (up to 100 units per acre with 15% non-residential component condition met), 750 sq. ft. average minimum living area per unit, open space, maximum number of stories (8), building materials, roofing design/materials, building orientation, entry features, features and massing, streetscape improvements, perimeter fencing, parking,. **Properties zoned PD-CA (Commercial Adjacency) have special provisions related to screening and transitional buffers. These are typically properties in a more commercial area that have been zoned to a residential use, including multifamily. The burden for protecting the residential use then falls to the PD-CA zoned property, not the pre-existing commercial uses that would be negatively affected by the introduction of a residential use adjacent to their property. 28

MULTI-FAMILYDEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS: OVERLAYDISTRICTS DN Downtown Neighborhood LCMU Lamar Collins Mixed Use ED Entertainment District BP BusinessPark VG Tierra Verde What is allowed? Multi-family is allowed in base districts (MF14,18, 22) or in PD and can follow regular Final Development Plan standards or MU standards Multi-familyallowed in MF18, MF22, and PD; can go up to 50 units per acre as part of mixed use development. New singleuse MF complexes are not allowed. Multi-family allowed in MF14, MF18, MF22 or PD Multi-family allowed in MF18, MF22 or PD Multi-family not allowed except in PD What is the development process? Must have appropriate base zoning or apply for and obtainpd zoning; must submit Final Development Plan which is approved by P&Z/CC (since May 2003) Must submit zoning application for PD along with Final Development Plan, both of which are reviewed and approved by P&Z/Council What design standards apply? What additional things above and beyond the Final Development Plan Standards will be reviewed, or are reviewed in greater detail? Developer can choose to follow regular standards for MF14, MF18, or MF22 per the Final Development Plan standards OR they can follow the MU district design standards. LCMU Standards govern setbacks, intrusions,living area (minimum 600 sq ft), common open space, open space amenities, stories (max 6), building materials, roof pitch, garages, building orientation and site design, streetscape improvements, landscape, screening, parking, signage ED standards govern open space, bike parking, signage, building materials, entries, colors, visual continuity, architecturalfeatures, streetscape, landscaping Follow regular standards for base zoning per Final Development Plan requirements Follow regular standards for base zoning per Final Development Plan requirements 29

MULTI-FAMILY POLICY REVIEW Remain a predominantly low-density, single-family community Prohibit or severely restrict new MF development Implement Design Standards Restrict Density to Specific DUA Encourage Rezoning of Vacant MF Property Encourage Development of MF near UTA/Downtown Improve Code Compliance No additional MF Zoning over9 units per acre in specific areas Ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses 1992 Comprehensive Plan 1996 Housing Goals and Policies East Sector Plan (1998) CentralSector Plan (1998) SoutheastSector Plan (1998) North Sector Plan (1999) Southwest Sector Plan (2001) West Sector Plan (2001) Downtown Master Plan (2004) Arlington Housing Needs Analysis (2004) 30

Future Considerations Review and analysis of: Residential density Student housing Policy implications 31