PROJECTS: P 0083(74)56; 036E; JONES COUNTY NH 0083(79)45; 04E7; MELLETTE COUNTY NH 0083(80)44; 04E8; MELLETTE COUNTY

Similar documents
PROJECT: P 0037(129)207 PCN: 039K BROWN COUNTY. S.D. Highway 37 From Aspen Ave to U.S. Highway 12 in Groton

Project NH 0018(179)402 PCN 036L Hutchinson and Turner County. US18 From US81 to SD19. Grading, Structure (Bridge), and Interim Surfacing

PROJECT NH 0050(99)381 PCN 6926 YANKTON COUNTY. SD HWY 50 (4 th Street) from Broadway Ave to Archery Road in Yankton, SD

PROJECT NH 0212(165)224 PCN 039L POTTER COUNTY. US212 - Through Gettysburg

INFORMATIONAL HANDOUT

MINNEHAHA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT HIGHWAY ACCESS APPLICATION & PERMIT

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING JULY 19, 2017 HOLYOKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE KITTREDGE CENTER HOLYOKE, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

Locally Administered Projects Overview

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING

Welcome to the Location Public Hearing for Highway 89 Improvements

DRIVEWAY/ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Douglas County Trunk Highways

OAKGREEN AVENUE. Project Goals. (County Road 65) Corridor Improvement Project. Turn lanes Resurfacing Stormwater management

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 28, 2018 KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL, AUDITORIUM SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

CHAPTER 9 RIGHT OF WAY

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

FM 1626 Public Hearing - January 14, 2016

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize guidance on those requirements generally applicable to grant programs.

Section 4(f) Why don t we build the road through this green space over here?

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING MAY 18, 2017 GROVELAND TOWN HALL GROVELAND, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00PM FOR THE PROPOSED

WRIGHT TOWNSHIP Ottawa County 1565 Jackson Street, P.O. Box 255, Marne, Michigan 49435

CHAPTER 3: IDENTIFYING SECTION 4(f) PROPERTIES

M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE

City of Palo Alto (ID # 4882) City Council Staff Report

MINUTE ORDER BONNER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES AUGUST 6, 2015

Ohio Township Association

SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

Hank's Exchange Road Bridge Replacement Project

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 12, 2017 TOWN HALL SULLIVAN MEETING ROOM 558 SOUTH MAIN STREET RAYNHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

SITE PLAN REVIEW ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW. Please Note: Once submitted to the County, all application materials become a matter of public record.

A B. C Submission. Subdivision Application under The Planning Act C.C.S.M. c. P80

APPLICATION PROCEDURE

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING JULY 7, 2016 CITY COUNCIL HEARING ROOM, FIRST FLOOR ONE GOVERNMENT CENTER FALL RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

LABEL PLEASE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS AND SITE PLANS MUST BE COMPLETED IN BLACK OR BLUE INK ONLY Intake by:

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 15, 2017 CARLTON M. VIVEIROS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COMMUNITY ROOM 525 SLADE STREET FALL RIVER, MA :00 PM

Evaluating and Processing Road and Utility Easement Proposals on Corps Lands and Flowage Easements

WRIGHT TOWNSHIP Ottawa County 1565 Jackson Street, P.O. Box 255, Marne, Michigan 49435

5. That the Owner shall agree that all development Blocks shown within the Draft Plan will be connected to full municipal services.

3. Will there be any amenities provided for the apartment or townhouse area, such as play areas or trails?

MAYHILL ROAD WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT - PUBLIC MEETING December 15, 2010 COMMENT CARD QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

Accelerated ROW Process for Sidewalks FAQ s

Welcome to the Location & Design Public Hearing for: Baymont Inn & Suites, Lake Hamilton, Arkansas Thursday, June 25, How do I become involved?

Attached is a Clinton Township Zoning Permit Application and requirements for issuance of a permit.

TECHNICAL PRESENTATION Project History and Description of the Proposed Improvements Perry Steger, Steger & Bizzell Engineering, Inc.

APPLICATION FOR DRIVEWAY PERMIT

Brief Summary of Drainage Law. November 2011

Tentative Map Application Review Procedures

BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP EMMET COUNTY, MICHIGAN. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 11A-99. (to replace prior Private Road Ordinance No.

MAJOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PROCESS GUIDE

TOWN OF NORTHWOOD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

PUBLIC HEARING FM 2499 Section 4

State, County, or Municipal Agency or instrumentality thereof, applying for authorization

ROAD USE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF (WIND FARM NAME) WIND FARM

Wells County Area Plan Commission Requirements for a Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) Testing Facility or Communication Tower Development Plan

NARRATIVE (GUIDELINES)

1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. September 24, 2018 Special Joint Meeting with Clay County Planning Commission. 3. Adoption of the Agenda

MINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES APRIL 7, 2016

MINOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PROCESS GUIDE

CEDAR COUNTY SECONDARY ROAD DEPARTMENT POLICY FOR UPGRADE OF LEVEL B COUNTY ROADS

ORDINANCE NO

Tiered Environmental Review Format (2017)

CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT

County Engineers Workshop February 4, Little River Casino and Resort Manistee, Michigan

13-2 SUBDIVISION PLANS AND PLATS REQUIRED EXCEPTIONS Subdivision Plats Required To be Recorded

PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA Gregg Manor Road - From Hill Lane to US 290 Travis County, Texas

Road Rights of Way And Obstructions

Site Development Review for

PUBLIC HEARING. Loop 88 Segment 3 Thursday, October 12, 2017 Lubbock-Cooper Performing Arts Center at 6:00p.m. Date. Footer Text

Heavily Wooded Acreage Lots at Navarro Mills Lake

TOWN OF BRISTOL. Ontario County, New York APPLICATION FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 9, ABIGAIL ADAMS MIDDLE SCHOOL Auditorium WEYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

610 LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENTS OUTSIDE A UGB

Consent Application Form

JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA

GUIDELINES. RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCES To COUNTY ROADS

Use permitted by: Right Special Exemption

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Region 2, USDA Forest Service

SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES SECTION DEVELOPMENTS REQUIRING SITE PLAN APPROVAL

SUBCHAPTER 02C - SECONDARY ROADS SECTION SECTION SECONDARY ROADS

Planned Residential Development ( PRD ) Application

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: July 19, 2018

Accelerated Right-of-Way Process for Sidewalks

Application for Site Plan Agreement

Prepared by: Nick Lagura, Associate Planner

DEVELOPMENT POLICY INFRASTRUCTURE GUIDELINES FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT

Resource Protection Area Map Update - Frequently Asked Questions

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014

Construction & Earthwork Request Form (CERF)

Frequently Asked Questions From the Certification of R/W Training Sessions

Walton County Planning and Development Services

For Office Use Only. Permit No. Fee: $ $ per proposed lot (AN ADDITIONAL 10% CODE COMPLIANCE FEE WILL BE CHARGED)

Chapter 4 Utility Locations and City Utility Easements

SECTION 4(F) & CHAPTER 26. TxDOT Environmental Conference 2017

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

Public Facilities and Finance Element

FINDINGS OF FACT. Page 1 of 8

Purpose of the Public Hearing

Information Guide. Buying A Home or Vacant Land?

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

MARK TWAIN LAKE MASTER PLAN CLARENCE CANNON DAM AND MARK TWAIN LAKE MONROE CITY, MISSOURI

Transcription:

Public Meeting/ Open House October 16, 2014 PROJECTS: P 0083(74)56; 036E; JONES COUNTY NH 0083(79)45; 04E7; MELLETTE COUNTY NH 0083(80)44; 04E8; MELLETTE COUNTY U.S. Highway 83 From White River to South of Murdo Grading; Replace Structures (Bridges) Over Horse Creek, Little White River, White River; Interim Surfacing; Curb Ramps The South Dakota Department of Transportation provides services without regard to race, color, gender, religion, national origin, age or disability, according to the provisions contained in SDCL 20-13, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 1994. Any person who has questions concerning this policy or who believes they have been discriminated against should contact the Department s Civil Rights Office at 605-773-3540.

US Highway 83 From White River to South of Murdo Mellette & Jones County P 0083(74)56 PCN 036E NH 0083(79)45 PCN 04E7 NH 0083(80)44 PCN 04E8 Neil Schochenmaier, PE Road Design Engineering Supervisor Involve You, the Traveling Public Discuss concerns, Exchange ideas Project Overview Background Information Proposed Project October 16, 2014 Grading, Curb and Gutter, Structures, and Storm Sewer in 1957 Resurfaced in 2001 Regrade, Curb and Gutter & Storm Sewer in 1993 (Town of White River) 2013 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 1,665 2033 Projected ADT = 2,183 31.7% Average Truck Traffic 3 Year Period from 2011 to 2013: 36 Reported Crashes 14 Animal Hit 8 Driver Error/Reckless Driving 7 Road Conditions 5 Equipment Malfunction 2 Alcohol Related (Pedestrians) 3 Fatalities Reported Crash Rate = 1.71 Statewide Crash Rate Average = 1.73 (Rural Principal Arterial) 1

Curves Subgrade Surfacing Structures North of White River Bridge to South of Murdo Replace Structure over Horse Creek Widen Shoulders Replace Fence and Culverts North of White River Bridge to South of Murdo Realignment to Improve Sight Distance and Avoid Mini Wiconi Waterline North of Town of White River to White River Bridge Replace Bridges over White River and Little White River Widen Shoulders Slight Realignment to Improve Sight Distance and Avoid Mini Wiconi Waterline Replace Fence and Culverts Murdo N Proposed Project Through Town of White River Update ADA Curb Ramps Asphalt Surfacing - US 83 from White River to Murdo 2

To provide safe, efficient access to streets and highways Limit number of direct accesses to major roadways Purchase ROW Where Realignment Occurs (Phase I) Permanent Easements Temporary Easements See Handout See Handout Private property, such as signs, buildings or private utilities located within the public ROW Federal Highway Regulations Safety Owners of encroachments will be contacted by Winner Area Personnel Some of the existing utilities may need to relocate. Utility Companies may negotiate easements with landowners as needed. West Central Electric Cherry/Todd Electric Golden West Communications Mini Wiconi Rural Water Any Known Private Utilities Contact SDDOT See Handout See Handout The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires that federally funded projects be reviewed to determine the social, economic, and environmental consequences of the action. Public involvement is beneficial to the implementation of a project s NEPA process. This project is being developed in accordance with applicable State & Federal environmental regulations. Your input on the following will aid in the project s development and NEPA review. Section 4(f) Property The project was reviewed to determine potential impacts to Section 4(f) properties, i.e. publicly owned parks, recreational areas, wildlife & waterfowl refuges, or public & private historical sites. No Section 4(f) properties have been identified along the project, to date. Section 106 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal actions to take into account the effects of project undertakings on historic properties. No historic properties were identified during a cultural resources survey of the project. A Geotech records search has been completed but the official report has not yet been submitted to SHPO concurrence but it is anticipated that No Known Historic or Cultural Properties will be Affected by this project. Contaminated Materials No contaminated materials have been identified along the project, to date. If you have information on contaminated materials, or underground/above ground storage tanks that could be encountered during construction, please let us know. Threatened & Endangered Species According to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, the following species are known to occur in Jones and Mellette Counties: Birds: Whooping Crane, Sprague s Pipit Mammal: Black Footed Ferret No species will be impacted by the project. Wetlands Federal regulations require that unavoidable wetland impacts caused by highway construction be mitigated. If you are interested in creating or restoring wetlands on your property, please complete the Wetland Mitigation Registry Form in the handouts. Wetlands will be impacted by the project. 3

Traffic maintained through project Road closed during inclement weather Winner Area Office will work with emergency vehicles to maintain access No oversized loads allowed through project Temporary diversion around structures Existing bridges will be utilized until new bridges are complete White River Bridge to Murdo (Phase I) Winter 2014 Held with individual landowners Driveway location / widths Fence Drainage Trees Cattle passes Landowners will be contacted by SDDOT to schedule an appointment See Handout Phase I Phase II Phase III Landowner Meetings Winter 2014 Winter 2015 2017 Final Design 2015 2016 2018 ROW Acquisition Process 2016 2017 ---- Construction 2017 2018 2019 Estimated Cost: $15.5 million $19.5 million $16.5 million Please Submit Questions or Comments by October 30, 2014 to: Neil.Schochenmaier@state.sd.us South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, SD 57501 Public Meeting Information http://sddot.com/dot/publicmeetings/default.aspx 4

Access Management South Dakota s Commitment to Safety and Smart Investment Decisions In Transportation What is Access Management? Access Management is the process of providing highway entrances only at locations where they can be provided safely and efficiently. Consider that each access point added to an undivided highway in an urban or suburban area increases the annual accident rate by 11 to 18 percent on that highway segment. In rural areas, each added access point increases the annual accident rate by 7 percent. Overall, drivewayaccess accidents alone cost South Dakota approximately $36.5 million each year. Each additional access point also contributes to congestion. The more driveways on a street the more places where people are slowing, changing lanes and turning. A five-lane street can quickly become a parking lot when there are many driveways in each block. When that happens, our valuable transportation investments are wasted and access to adjacent businesses is restricted. Controlled access facilities are segments of highway where either no access or only limited access to the highway is allowed. Interstate highways are an example of controlled access facilities where no access to the highway is allowed. Good access depends on the following: Limiting the number of conflict points (places where there is a potential for crashes) Separating conflict areas Reducing interference with through traffic Providing good on-site circulation and storage Properly spaced traffic signals How does Access Management affect businesses? Studies have shown that access management can provide three benefits to businesses adjacent to highways: Making sure that drivers can get in and out of businesses without being blocked by other traffic Making the highway more attractive by reducing congestion Extending the business effective service area by reducing travel times These benefits come not from having many driveways, but by having well-planned, well-located, high-capacity access points on the highway. Even skeptical business owners have found that proper access management results in an improved business climate, as customers can easily get in and out of their business establishment. For more information on Access Management, contact: Dan Staton, SDDOT Access Management Engineer, 2300 Eglin St. Rapid City, SD 57703 Mailing Address: PO Box 1970 57709; E-Mail: Daniel.Staton@state.sd.us

Right of Way Information Individual Landowner Meetings: During the early stages of the project s design, SDDOT will schedule a meeting with individual landowners having property adjacent to the project. See the following page for an explanation of the landowner meeting. Property Acquisition Offer: After the project construction plans have been prepared and the right of way limits have been established, you will be contacted by an appraiser or negotiations agent to visit with you for that portion of your property that is needed for construction of the project. Your property will be valued and a written offer presented to you by a negotiating agent who will contact you for an appointment to make the written offer. Relocation Assistance Program: This program provides a variety of services and payments to owners and tenants who have personal property affected by the right of way being acquired for the project. Relocation payments are in addition to payments made for the real property being acquired. To preserve your eligibility for payments, do not move property until you have received a written relocation offer or have contacted Andrew J. Andy Jackson of the SDDOT Right of Way Program in Rapid City. His phone number is 605-394-1626. Anyone not satisfied with the relocation offer made to them may appeal using the procedures described in the Relocation Brochure. The landowner may be reimbursed for various fair and reasonable incidental expenses that may be incurred during the transfer of property to the State depending on impacts to personal property and qualifications. Right of Way Information Brochures: Two brochures Better Roads Brochure and Relocation Assistance Brochure have been prepared which explain the SDDOT s Right of Way process. They provide information on your rights regarding the acquisition of your property and the benefits available to you with regard to the Relocation Assistance Program. These brochures are available at this meeting on the Sign-in table. Please feel free to take a copy of each with you. These brochures are available at the following SDDOT website: http://www.sddot.com/resources/brochures/

Encroachments in ROW Federal Regulations (CFR 23.1) require that the State Highway Department (SD DOT) shall be responsible for preserving such ROW free of all public and private installation, facilities, and encroachments. No improvements shall be allowed to remain in the ROW unless they are deemed in the best interest of the pubic and will not impair the highway or interfere with the free and safe flow of traffic. Encroachments are any private property or improvement in the public ROW that is not approved by permit such as: - Landscaping Items - Fence - Signs - Buildings - Etc. SD DOT Staff will survey the project limits to identify all encroachments. Prior to the project being let to contract, landowners will be contacted by the SD DOT or City Government regarding how each encroachment will be addressed or handled. If it is determined that the removal of an encroachment is required, it will be the landowner s responsibility to remove the encroachment. For additional information please contact: Brad Norrid, Winner Area Engineering Supervisor SDDOT Winner Area Office P.O. Box 771 Winner, SD 57580 Phone: (605) 842-0810; E-Mail: Brad.Norrid@state.sd.us

Environmental, Social & Economic Impacts and Advanced Utility Coordination Environmental, Social & Economic Impacts Project will comply with all state and federal environmental regulations No splitting of neighborhoods will occur as a result of this project Project will be coordinated with the following state and federal agencies: SD Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources SD Dept. of Game, Fish & Parks US Fish & Wildlife Service State Historic Preservation Office For additional information, please contact : Terry Keller, Engineer Supervisor SDDOT Project Development Office 700 E. Broadway Ave. Pierre SD 57501 Phone: 605-773-3721; E-Mail: Terry.Keller@state.sd.us Advanced Utility Coordination Highway projects may require adjustments or relocation of existing utilities located along or crossing the highway project. The SDDOT has an "Advanced Utility Coordinating Process" in place that addresses all existing utility involvement. This process involves meeting with the utility owner and project designers to review any conflicts and determine the most cost effective option of changing the design to avoid the existing utility or adjusting the utility. If the utility is required to relocate, all replacement utility easement acquisition and relocation work will be addressed and coordinated between the landowner and the utility company. For additional information please contact: Dave Hausmann, Utility Coordinator SDDOT Road Design Office 700 E. Broadway Ave. Pierre, SD 57501 Phone 605-773-3433; E-Mail: Dave.Hausmann@state.sd.us

Wetland Mitigation Registry Form Federal regulations require that unavoidable wetland impacts caused by highway construction be mitigated. Wetland mitigations may be from 1) wetland creation typically, at a borrow pit; 2) wetland restoration plugging an existing, drained wetland; or, 3) by small dam construction. The South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) may participate in the cost of wetland creation/restoration, if the wetland can be used to mitigate wetland impacts caused by highway construction. If you are interested in creating or restoring wetlands on your property, please complete the attached form and mail to: Terry Keller, Engineering Supervisor SDDOT, and 700 E. Broadway Ave., Pierre, SD 57501. Your name will be added to the SDDOT Wetland Mitigation Registry and a SDDOT representative will contact you with additional information. Yes, I am interested in assisting the SDDOT to mitigate wetland impacts by creating or restoring wetlands on my property. Name: Address: Phone #: Legal Description of property: 1/4 of Section Township, Range, County Please note: Completion of this form does not commit either you or the SDDOT to a mitigation project. It is a statement of intent only.

Individual Landowner Meetings The purpose of this meeting is to provide you with an opportunity to comment on various issues pertaining to the design of this highway project as it relates to your property. The following topics will be discussed at the meetings. Please note that not all topics will apply to every property owner. 1. Permanent purchase and/or temporary use of your property. 2. Locations and widths of entrances to your property: The standard South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) entrance-width for rural highways is 24 feet. Note: In general, existing entrance widths along rural State Highways are 24 feet or smaller. A maximum width of 40 feet is allowed at locations where it is deemed appropriate and necessary. Entrances in urban areas can vary from 16 feet to 40 feet. The goal of the SDDOT is to provide property owners located adjacent to the project with the access they need, and at the same time, enhance highway safety and reduce project costs. In some instances, the SDDOT may seek to combine duplicate entrances. For example, if your property has two or three entrances to the same property that are located close to each other, we would ask you to assess your current entrance needs and consider one entrance location that will meet those needs. 3. Permanent fencing adjacent to the highway: SDDOT s fencing policy allows for the replacement of all disturbed fence with like-kind fence. Two fence types are typically installed: Type 2: 4-strand barbed wire with 8-inch wire spacing, and Type 6: 32-inch woven wire with 1 strand of barbed wire on the bottom and 2 strands of barbed wire on the top. Page 12 of the Better Roads Brochure contains added discussion of your permanent fencing options. This brochure will be available at the meeting. 4. Temporary fencing adjacent to the highway: Do you anticipate having livestock in pastures located adjacent to the proposed project during highway construction activities? 5. Are you aware of any waterlines, drainfields, septic tanks, underground storage tanks, underground power lines, etc. that are located adjacent to the project and may be impacted by construction activities? 6. Are there any highway-related drainage or flooding problems located along your property or elsewhere along this section of highway? 7. Possible sites for gravel and additional fill material: Are you aware of potential material available for construction that might be located adjacent to the highway? 8. Temporary access during construction activities. Please review your property and be prepared to discuss the above issues, as well as any other issues that you feel are unique to your property. No offers to acquire property will be made at these meetings since revisions to the plans may occur from your input.

Access Management PUBLIC COMMENTS Projects: South Dakota s P 0083(74)56, Commitment NH 0083(79)45, to Safety and NH Smart 0083(80)44 Investment Decisions In Transportation PCN: 036E, 04E7, 04E8 County: Jones & Mellette Location: US 83 from White River to Murdo Name: Date: Address: Written testimony will be included in the meeting record. Please submit comments by October 30. Send to: Neil Schochenmaier, Road Design Engineering Supervisor E Mail Address: Neil.Schochenmaier@state.sd.us South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, SD 57501 2586