THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CA M E M O R A N D U M

Similar documents
2 VISION FOR EDEN AREA 2025

STAFF REPORT.. 2 FINDINGS...6

MACK URBAN SITE 1 & 1a (VTT-72702) PROJECT DESCRIPTION (REVISED )

Plan Dutch Village Road

3.0 Project Description

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

CRA/LA, A DESIGNATED LOCAL AUTHORITY (Successor Agency to the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, CA) M E M O R A N D U M

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

City of Camarillo CC XVIII A 1 AGENDA REPORT. Date: January 24, Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers. Dave Norman, City Manager

Proposed Urban Village (San Juan Hotel & Villas)

CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

January 7, Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN Dear Ms. Smith,

Agenda Report DATE: APRIL 30,2007 TO: CITY COUNCIL CYNTHIA J. KURTZ, CITY MANAGER FROM:

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT VARIANCE AND WAIVER THE ROSALYNN APARTMENTS

NC 54/I-40 Corridor Master Plan Draft Land Use Blueprint

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability, in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

ROEBLING MANSION REDEVELOPMENT AREA PLAN

Planning and Development Services Department

OPEN HOUSE WELCOME. edmonton.ca/rezoning. CITY OF EDMONTON Sustainable Development

April 12, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL CASE NO.: ENV EIR PROJECT NAME: PROJECT APPLICANT:

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan

River Glen Apartments

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

[Q] R5-4D 127-5A209. Central City

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Date: December 3, 2012

exclusive development offering

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

SHARED GROWTH AND SHAPING THE PUBLIC REALM RAYMOND ANDREW SIH, UAP, LEED AP

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Master Plan Review SILVER SPRING CBD. Approved and Adopted February Updated January 2013

R E S O L U T I O N. 1. Request: A Departure from Parking and Loading Standards (DPLS-449) for 32 parking spaces.

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

Mr. Carl Shannon, Senior Managing Director Tishman Speyer One Bush Street, Suite 450 San Francisco, CA November 21, 2014

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 8.1 PURPOSE 8.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY BUILDING TYPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7-1

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

The Miramar Santa Monica

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

In order to permit maximum applicability of the PUD District, PUD-1 and PUD-2 Districts are hereby created.

PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Planning Commission Report

Table of Contents. Oakland Unified School District Zoning Information. Oakland Zoning and Estuary Policy Plan Maps. Zoning Information Summary

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Project: Address: MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

50+54 BELL STREET NORTH

THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA M E M O R A N D U M

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS

Report by Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee (B)

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

City of Stockton. Legislation Text AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 501 AND 509 WEST WEBER AVENUE

Chair and Members of Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel. A0596/16TEY Yonge St New 5 Storey Non-residential Building

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

EXHIBIT D. WRITTEN DESCRIPTION For. TOWNSEND VILLAGE PUD December 23, 2015 (Revised)

Justification Statement CENTURY Application for Sketch Plan and Preliminary/Site Plan Amendments. July 30, 2015

Table of Contents. Concept Plan Overview. Statement of Compliance with Design Guidelines. Statement of Compliance with Comprehensive Plan

FUTURE LAND USE. City of St. Augustine Comprehensive Plan EAR-Based Amendments

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

CITY OF CHICAGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION March 9, 2004 SUMMARY SHEET

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

SanJose. Memorandum. \\[i[ Or. FROM: Jacky Morales-Ferrand TO: RULES AND OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE. SUBJECT: ALMADEN ROAD DATE: November 1, 2017

APPENDIX A PART 1: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

General Plan. Page 44

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Planning Commission. DATE: September 28, 2015 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3

Emerald Parc Filbert Street Oakland, California THIS PDF IS NOT SIZED FOR PRINT

September 4, Hollywood Center Project

Adaptive Reuse Ordinance Converting Obsolete Commercial and Industrial Buildings into New Residential Uses

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

STAFF SUMMARY OF Z17-10 CONDITIONAL ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

Seth Mallen, Vice President Maximus Real Estate Partners 525 Florida Street, Ste. 150 San Francisco, CA November 10, 2015

CHAPTER 29 ARTICLE 8. 20,000 sf 30,000 sf 100,000 sf (with approval by Special Use Permit according to Sec

PLAINFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING, ZONING & BUILDING SERVICES MEMORANDUM

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

MEMORANDUM. SUBJECT: Status Report DATE: April 21, 2016

Transcription:

CUIY RVLP GCY F CIY F L GL, C R U : CBR 15, 2011 2 C6990 : FR: FF: UBJC: CR/L BR F CIIR CRII L, CIF XCUIV FFICR JY CLI, CIG RGIL IIRR II P R, R R VLP G KR Y, IR R ighth and Grand Residential Land Use pproval. Consideration of environmental effects of proposed residential use on property designated Commercial and approval of mixed use development at ighth treet and Grand venue in City Center Redevelopment Project rea RCI RGI (C 9) hat the CR/L Board of Commissioners: 1. dopt a Resolution certifying that it has reviewed and considered the environmental effects of the project as shown in the City of Los ngeles itigated egative eclaration nv-2005-7367 ( ) and the third ddendum thereto, pursuant to California nvironmental Quality ct ( CQ ) Guidelines set forth in California Code of Regulations ection 15096(f); and 2. pprove a Residential Use on a property designated for commercial use by the City Center Redevelopment Plan ( Redevelopment Plan ), located at 770 outh Grand venue, 717 outh live treet and 721 outh live treet ( ite ), to allow development of a mixed-use project with 700 residential units and 30,000 square feet of commercial uses. URY he recommended actions will allow hermo Grand LLC ( eveloper ) to proceed with its revised mixed use development on the ite located in the outh Park neighborhood of downtown Los ngeles. map of the ite is on ttachment. he revised development is a 7 story building containing 700 units of lower density rental housing with approximately 30,000 square feet of neighborhood-serving commercial uses ( Project ). he eveloper anticipates commencing construction of the Project in early 2012, but is unable to proceed unless the existing uccessor wner Participation greement ( uccessor P ) is terminated. he uccessor P (dated June 2006) relates to an earlier planned development on the ite consisting of 875 condominium units in three buildings ranging from 15 to 38 stories in height, and 36,349 square feet of ground floor

IG R GR VU 2 retail. Given current construction costs and market conditions, that development proposal is now economically infeasible. erminating the uccessor P (through a separate Board action) and approving a Residential use on the commercially designated ite (through this action) will allow the revised Project to proceed. n ecember 28, 1990, CR/L entered into an wner Participation greement ( riginal P ) with Pacific tlas evelopment Corporation for development of two office towers on the Project ite. hat project received 134,000 square feet of transferred floor area ratio ( FR ) and CR/L received a payment of $5,762,000 used to support rehabilitation of the Young partments and Grand Central quare as a community benefit. he Pacific tlas project was approved but not developed due to litigation by outside parties and the economic downturn of the early 1990 s. n June 18, 1999, CR/L terminated the riginal P; however, the additional FR was retained on the ite. n June 15, 2006, CR/L entered into the described uccessor P with eveloper. hrough that P, eveloper retained the FR granted by the riginal P and was granted additional floor area ratio ( FR ) of 149,997 for a community benefit payment of $1,500,000 to kid Row ousing rust. he original and additional FR combined to total 283,997 square feet of additional FR. dditionally, on June 15, 2006 the Board approved a residential use on the ite to permit the residential developments described in the riginal and in the uccessor Ps. ll prior residential use approvals (and FR allocated to the ite) will expire and be relinquished by eveloper with execution of a ermination greement for the uccessor P. s a result, the revised Project requires Board re-approval of a residential use on the ite. Re-approval is necessary because the Redevelopment Plan designates the ite for commercial uses only. ccordingly, the Board s discretionary approval to allow the revided Project s residential use is needed under Redevelopment Plan ection 503.6. Based on the Findings (set forth in the ICUI BCKGRU below), staff recommends approval of the revised Project s residential uses on the ite. PRVIU CI June 18, 1999 CR/L Board pproval of greement to erminate P with Pacific tlas evelopment. June 15, 2006 CR/L Board pproval of Various pprovals, including approval of residential uses, density variation, schematic design drawings and owner participation agreement for a mixed-use development and entering into a uccessor P with hermo Grand LLC. ICUI BCKGRU Location he ite consists of an approximately 130,275 square-foot parcel designated Commercial by the Redevelopment Plan. he ite is bordered by eventh treet on the north; live treet on the east; ighth treet on the south; and Grand venue on the west. butting the ite are two historic buildings a 12-story building on the western side and a six-story building on the eastern side referred to, collectively, as the Brockman-andel Lofts. he Brockman-andel Lofts front eventh treet.

IG R GR VU 3 he ite currently is a surface parking lot. It is located in an area improved with various buildings (including commercial and residential) primarily built in the early 20 th century. In recent years, many of these buildings have been adapted for mixed uses. In addition to the Brockman-andel Lofts, uses in the vicinity include the Carrier Center-L telecom network facility, structured and surface parking facilities to the west; a surface parking lot to the south; a jewelry wholesale/manufacturing building, and a senior citizen housing complex and mixed residential/retail building to the east. eveloper ntity he eveloper and ite owner is hermo Grand venue, LLC, represented by onny stani, who executed the uccessor P with CR/L. escription and Project Context he eveloper proposes to develop the revised Project in two phases as follows: Phase I. Phase I will be located on the west side of the ite fronting Grand venue and a portion of ighth treet. he 7 story building will contain 240 residential units on 208,370 square feet of floor area, and 16,085 square feet of neighborhood commercial retail uses, including approximately 2,425 square feet of restaurant space. pproximately, 26,180 square feet of open space will be provided partially within private balconies and an elevated courtyard. ne and one half levels of parking will be provided with the first level located at grade and one subterranean level below. Vehicular access for the subterranean level is proposed to be exclusively located at the northern portion of the ite at Grand venue, while vehicular ingress and egress for commercial and guest parking is proposed off of ighth and live treets. Phase II. Phase II will occupy the remaining portion of the ite (on the east), and will front live treet and a portion of ighth treet. he proposed building will contain 460 residential units on 359,260 square feet of floor area, and 13,165 square feet of neighborhood commercial retail uses. pproximately 49,955 square feet of open space will be located within two elevated central courtyards, private balconies, fitness room and within the rear yard. hree levels of parking will be provided with the first level located at grade and one and one half subterranean levels below. Vehicular access will be the same as the Phase I. he revised project will not require any ransfer of Floor rea Ratio (FR) and the proposed density is allowed under the Plan. Community Benefits he revised Project benefits the owntown community by providing housing and commercial space in a transit- and jobs-rich environment. he Project will support and enhance the creation of a 24/7 environment in the outh Park Community. he revised Project provides ground floor retail and restaurant facilities facing Grand venue and ighth treet. s such, it will support and extend the existing retail and restaurant activity on eventh treet, furthering the pedestrian-orientation of the eventh treet Retail Corridor. he ground level retail uses will be neighborhood-serving. he eveloper s goal is to bring a small neighborhood-serving grocery market to the commercial space in Phase I. grocery market of this type is expected to be in high demand for residents seeking goods and services conveniently located in the immediate

IG R GR VU 4 area. dditional commercial uses have the added benefit of attracting more pedestrian activity which will help to activate the streets in the surrounding area. Findings to llow Residential Use on ite Pursuant to ection 503.6 of the Redevelopment Plan, CR/L may permit appropriately designed and properly located residential facilities within areas designated Commercial, upon the Board making the four Findings below. Based on the facts listed below, staff recommends that the Board make these four Findings and approve the revised Project s residential uses on the ite. 1. Promote community revitalization he revised Project promotes community revitalization in the City Center Redevelopment Project ( Project rea ) in several ways. First, it replaces an underutilized surface parking lot with well designed buildings that will promote enjoyable downtown living. econd, it creates commercial uses which will serve the growing residential neighborhood along ighth treet and Grand venue (including future residents of the Project). hird, the Project will open the sidewalks surrounding the ite to pedestrians thus contributing to the walkability of downtown streets within the Project rea. 1. Promote the goals and objectives in the Redevelopment Plan he revised Project meets many of the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan by eliminating or preventing the spread of blight and deterioration in the Project rea through filling in a gap in development that has been occupied only with a large surface parking lot for many years. It does this through re-purposing the ite with a major new mixed use development for downtown. dditionally, the Project furthers the development of owntown as the major center of the Los ngeles metropolitan region through the addition of a substantial amount of residential and commercial space. It promotes the development and rehabilitation of economic enterprises including retail and other commercial uses; creating a modern, efficient and balanced urban environment, including a full range of around-the-clock activities and uses, particularly through the addition of 700 new residential units. It helps to achieve excellence in design through quality architecture and provision of new structures that relate to the sidewalks and promote pedestrian activity; and provides new medium-density housing close to employment. 2. Be compatible with and appropriate for commercial uses in the vicinity. he revised Project a mixed-use condominium development would be compatible with and appropriate for the existing outh Park neighborhood, a mix of residences, neighborhood-serving commercial uses and public facilities. he nearby eventh treet Retail Corridor is a highly active residential/commercial environment, as is the outh Park community to the south which features several mid- and high-rise residential facilities including the arket Lofts, kyline Condominiums, lleven, Luma and vo. 3. Include amenities appropriate to the size and type of housing units proposed

IG R GR VU 5 he eveloper proposes to provide approximately 77,000 square feet of open space. nce complete, this open space will consist of two central courtyards (serving Phases I and II) with landscaped open/gathering spaces and private balconies. he central courtyard of Phase I will be mostly open and will feature a pool located at the northern portion of the ite. Phase II will extend the courtyard and feature an additional pool as well as a spa and a large landscaped area. hese amenities will be available to all Project residents. n additional landscaped area will be provided within the rear yard of Phase II and serve as additional open space. Further, the proposed Project will have 254 trees. fitness room/gym of 7,300 square feet is also envisioned. 4. eet design and location criteria required by the CR/L he revised Project meets the design criteria set forth in the owntown esign Guidelines for the creation of ground-floor retail along Grand venue and ighth treet that will help to activate the sidewalks and encourage walkability. In addition, the facades of the buildings will be landscaped, adding to the pleasurable experience of walking along these streets. qually important, the Project meets the location criteria required by CR/L. he ite is located in an area characterized as an urban neighborhood with a mix of residential and commercial uses, and close to mass transit and to employment. URC F FU o funding is required for this action. PRGR BUG IPC his action is consistent with the FY12 Budget and ork Program, which provides staff time and services under the Response to evelopment pportunities work objective. here is no impact on the City s General Fund as a result of this action. VIRL RVI he City of Los ngeles is the lead agency for the Project for purposes of the California nvironmental Quality ct (CQ). n February 24, 2006, the City of Los ngeles, acting through its Planning epartment approved the original project and on June 15, 2006 the CR/L Board of Commissioners, as a Responsible gency in connection with its approval of residential uses, density variation, schematic design drawings and an owner participation agreement reviewed and considered the environmental effects of the Project. ince that time the developer has modified the project and now seeks approval for the Project, as revised. he City of Los ngeles prepared a third reconsideration to the (an ddendum) on ovember 22, 2011 stating that the revised Project will not create any new substantial impacts beyond those previously analyzed and it does not represent any increase or substantial change to the original Project, therefore pursuant to CQ recirculation of the is not required. he CR/L Board of Commissioners responsibility is to review and consider the environmental effects of the revised Project as shown in the and the third ddendum prepared by the Lead gency.

IG R GR VU 6 Christine ssel Chief xecutive fficer By: avid Riccitiello eputy Chief xecutive fficer here is no conflict of interest known to me which exists with regard to any CR/L officer or employee concerning this action. ttachments ttachment : ttachment B: ttachment C: Location/ite ap evelopment ite Plan Land Use Resolution

C R / L City Center Redevelopment Project rea 8th & Grand City of Los ngeles V R Y R K BR Y I R JU L I G þ } þ } 2 LI V 134 405 101 10 ^! 10 þ } 60 710 105 110 I LL ap ocument Prepared by CR GI epartment Project Information erived from the ap ate: 7/13/2011 atabase CR CK R R LI 5 JU P L L I C P C V LI 101 210 170 L þ } L R G RI P I V R L L BR 118 FR Y P L I BL þ } 8 LL L I LI C RY CU R C K FR C K C I C Y L IV GR GR V 4 BL C L 12 PI G V FR R U FL P BL V V C C C 7 PI 3R L FI G BI X CI FR Y 2 8 R 3R 9 P Project ite G C GI R G L 11 C V R I F8L P L 8 I C K R C 5 I 4 2 7 110 V B L RL G V BL V L R UL IG P 4 P I R X L I BI GR I P ixed Use Redevelopment Project Community Redevelopment gency

CUIY RVLP GCY F CIY F L GL, CLIFRI RLUI. RLUI F CUIY RVLP GCY F CIY F L GL (CR/L), CLIFRI, CRIFYIG I RVI CIR CIY F L GL IIG GIV CLRI, FR 8 GR PRJC I CIY CR RVLP PRJC ttachment C R, hermo Grand LLC ( pplicant ), originally proposed to develop the 8 th and Grand Project ( Project ) as an 875 for sale residential units (approximately 1,029,074 square feet), 36,349 square feet of commercial space, and 1,435 parking spaces; and R, the City of Los ngeles ( City ) acting through its Planning epartment was the lead agency under the California nvironmental Quality ct ( CQ ) for the Project and prepared a itigated egative eclaration, nv-2005-7367 ( ); and R, on February 24, 2006, the City adopted the and approved entitlement requests for the Project; and R, the CR/L Board of Commissioners, as a Responsible gency for the Project, in connection with its approval of residential uses, density variation, schematic design drawings and an owner participation agreement (P) on June 15, 2006, reviewed and considered the environmental effects of the Project as shown in the prepared by the City; and R, now the pplicant, proposes to construct a modified Project consisting of 700 residential rental units, 29,250 square feet of retail and restaurant uses, and 737 parking spaces; and R, the City of Los ngeles prepared a third ddendum to the on ovember 22, 2011 stating that the modified Project will not create any new substantial impacts beyond those previously analyzed and it does not represent any increase or substantial change to the original Project, therefore pursuant to CQ recirculation of the is not required; and R, on ecember 15, 2011 the CR/L Board of Commissioners approved a ermination greement terminating the P between CR/L and hermo Grand venue LLC; and, RFR, B I RLV by the Community Redevelopment gency of the City of Los ngeles, California, as follows: 1. he CR/L Board of Commissioners discretionary approval is required to allow the residential uses now proposed on commercially designated land. 2. he CR/L is a Responsible gency pursuant to CQ (Public Resources Code ection 21069, tate CQ Guidelines ection 15381). s a Responsible gency, the CR/L Board of Commissioners considered the environmental effects of the Project as shown in the City s and third ddendum, thereto. 3. Based on such review and consideration, the CR/L Board of Commissioners hereby determines: a. o substantial changes are proposed in the Project that will require major revisions to the.

b. o substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is being undertaken that will require major revisions to the ; and c. o new information of substantial importance to the Project, which was not known or could not have been known at the time the was prepared, has become available. P: