APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING COUNTY FINANCES

Similar documents
APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING COUNTY FINANCES

APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING CITY FINANCES

APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING COUNTY FINANCES

Appendix A. Factors Affecting City Expenditures

Appendix A. Factors Affecting City Current Expenditures

Background. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS INDIANA Survey of State Law

FIRE DISTRICTS FUND. The Fire Districts Fund consists of primarily one funding source: property taxes (ad valorem revenue).

002 - Assessor GENERAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES ASSESSOR Assessor. At a Glance:

A PRELIMINARY FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC REDEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE CITY OF FERNLEY, NEVADA

In the context of a Major Disaster, this revenue procedure provides temporary

DRAFT REPORT. Boudreau Developments Ltd. Hole s Site - The Botanica: Fiscal Impact Analysis. December 18, 2012

The Local Impact of Home Building in Douglas County, Nevada. Income, Jobs, and Taxes generated. Prepared by the Housing Policy Department

Community Occupancy Guidelines

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24

2013 Wisconsin Real Estate and Economic Outlook Conference: City of Milwaukee Interventions in the Wake of Private Market Failures

The Local Government Fiscal Impacts of Land Uses in Union County:

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Highs & Lows of Floodplain Regulations

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

James Alm, Robert D. Buschman, and David L. Sjoquist In the wake of the housing market collapse

ONTARIO S CONDOMINIUM ACT REVIEW ONCONDO Submissions. Summary

AN ECONOMIC, FISCAL AND CAPITAL ASSET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THIRTEEN PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENTS ON THE TOWN OF DENTON, MARYLAND.

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND FACILITIES

NC General Statutes - Chapter 153A Article 15 1

Suburban Sprawl: Exposing Hidden Costs, Identifying Innovations. Summary

Rent Policy. Approved on: 9 December 2010 Board of Management Consolidated November 2015

Audit of City Lease Administration

Implementing Small Area Fair Market Rents (SAFMRs) in the HCV Program. Plano Housing Authority Case Study

BUSI 330 Suggested Answers to Review and Discussion Questions: Lesson 1

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES PARKS

Securing Land Rights for Broadband Land Acquisition for Utilities in Sweden

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN POLICY/PROCEDURE Approved by the Town Council at the Town Council Meeting

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association s Annual Meetings Mobile, Alabama, February 4-7, 2007

CHAPTER 4 IMPACT FEES

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Abington Terrace Development Abington Township, Montgomery County

Eastern Corridor Planning Area Workshop No April 2016

The Baltimore City Property Tax Study

Economic Impact Analysis Grand Oaks St. Johns County, Florida

FIRE FACILITIES IMPACT FEE STUDY NEWCASTLE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FINAL DRAFT JUNE 24, 2014

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 320/373

Student Generation Rate and School Impact Fee Study Update

CITY OF BOISE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION CDBG MONITORING FORM

Ann Item # AGENDA MEMORANDUM

Assessment-To-Sales Ratio Study for Division III Equalization Funding: 1999 Project Summary. State of Delaware Office of the Budget

X. The Roles of Federal, State, and Local Governments

Large Scale Stock Transfer and Relationships with the Community

Panama City Beach Fire Service Assessment Information

City of Scottsbluff, Nebraska Monday, November 21, 2016 Regular Meeting

THE TREND OF REAL ESTATE TAXATION IN KANSAS, 1910 TO 1942¹

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: WILDWOOD GLEN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT C-91

AN ACT RELATING TO PUBLIC FINANCE; PERMITTING STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO PROVIDE OR PAY THE COST OF LAND, BUILDINGS OR

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

RIVER DANCE RV PARK ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT REPORT TOWN OF GYPSUM - SEPTEMBER RPI Consulting LLC.

Fiscal Year 2019 Community Development Block Grant Program Funding Request. Cover Sheet. City of Lakewood, Division of Community Development

Mini-Thesis Siam University (International Master of Business Administration), Bangkok, Thailand 2015 CHAPTER IV

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

Background. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS MICHIGAN Survey of State Law

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT & VETERANS AFFAIRS ANALYSIS LOCAL LEGISLATION

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2003

CHAPTER NINE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS

North Dakota Communities Acutely Impacted by Oil and Gas Development: Housing Demand Analysis

S 2001 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Chapter 12 Changes Since This is just a brief and cursory comparison. More analysis will be done at a later date.

Port Authority of the City of Saint Paul Property Assessed Clean Energy Program (PACE OF MN) JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT

FINANCIAL IMPACTS REPORT

LIHEAP. JEOPARDY! Day 1

820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC Tel: Fax:

Report on Inspection of Ferlita, Walsh, Gonzalez & Rodriguez, P.A. (Headquartered in Tampa, Florida) Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING

AN ACT RELATING TO HOUSING; AMENDING AND ENACTING SECTIONS OF THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ACT; ADDING AND CLARIFYING DEFINITIONS;

South African Council for Town and Regional Planners

THE EFFECTS OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR SPENDING CUTS SINCE 2010 ON ASSET MANAGEMENT

Comprehensive Plan /24/01

City of Southgate Shared Services Plan Increasing Governmental Efficiency Through Collaboration

ACCOUNTING FOR CAPITAL ASSETS. Presented by: Joel Knopp, CPA Shareholder

Sincerely, Meda11ion,zne. Bemff. enclosure. P.S. On a personal note, I d like to wish you a Happy Thanksgiving and Holiday Season.

Understanding Texas TIRZ Statute Chapter 311 Texas Tax Code

Revaluation process ongoing in Norwalk

Regular Meeting Date: April 5, 2017

Industry Forecasts AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION. June 2018

Amendments to the Low-Income Housing Credit Compliance-Monitoring Regulations. ACTION: Final regulations and removal of temporary regulations.

RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SANTA ANA TO ESTABLISH A HOTEL DEVELOPMENT

Housing and the Economy: Impacts, Forecasts and Challenges

MEMORANDUM. 1. Approve additional expenses in the amount of $29,685 for additional work on the 2015 Street Repair project;

Office of the County Auditor. Broward County Property Appraiser Report on Transition Review Services

Treasury Regulations 1.42

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design, and Sustainability in consultation with the Director of Legal Services

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2005

4/8/2015 Item #10E Page 1

Accounting for Leases

ACT 425 AGREEMENTS: CAN THEY WORK FOR YOU? LAW, WEATHERS & RICHARDSON, P.C. 333 Bridge Street, NW, Suite 800 Grand Rapids, MI (616)

Subpart A - GENERAL ORDINANCES Chapter 66 - TAXATION ARTICLE V. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION

How to Set Permit Fees

MPEEM The New and Improved Residual Technique of Reserve Valuation

Boone County, Kentucky Cost of Community Services Study Executive Summary

How Did Foreclosures Affect Property Values in Georgia School Districts?

Minnesota Department of Health Grant Agreement

Transcription:

APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING COUNTY FINANCES

This page left blank intentionally

Appendix A Factors Influencing County Finances The finances of counties are affected by many different factors. Some of the variation results from decisions made by county officials, and some are due to factors outside the control of the elected officials such as state mandates, county size, economic status of residents, and the proximity of similar services provided elsewhere. The amount of revenue available may be influenced by changes in property values, the use of fee-based services, intergovernmental grants for projects, and other interrelated factors. Expenditures may be affected by the demographic, geographic, historical, or political landscape of the county. One-time events such as floods, fires, and tornadoes that create demand for cleanup and reconstruction may cause expenditures to increase significantly for a year or more. Some factors have an ongoing effect on county finances, while others might be one-time events. A. Demographics Population. Counties with higher populations face different challenges than smaller populated counties. Dealing with high traffic numbers imposes a greater cost depending on the burden carried by an area s highways. Population decline. Infrastructure costs do not decrease automatically when population decreases, even if costs remain the same. If the populations decreases, the county must make decisions to reduce services or raise property taxes to generate the revenue. Income. Income is directly related to a county s ability to raise revenues. Where incomes are lower, property values may also be depressed, reducing a county s tax capacity. In addition, there may be a greater demand for public services in areas where poverty rates are higher. Crime rate. Higher crime rates require a correspondingly higher level of public safety services. Counties that host sporting and other entertainment events can draw large crowds of nonresidents and create unusual public safety service demands. In addition to these demands, a number of different factors may impact expenditures including the number, type and use of personnel, the scope of services, and the amount of shared services. In addition, the demographics and mix of facilities within the county may affect expenditures for public safety. B. Geographic location Different areas of the state often operate within quite different economic environments. Just the presence of one large business or industry can impact an entire region. Declines in industries or companies that dominate local economies may result in a reduction of the tax capacity of the area. 77

C. Revenue sources Tax capacity. The tax capacity of a county reflects the taxable value of the properties in the county multiplied by the relevant class rates. A county with a relatively high tax capacity as compared to other counties may be able to meet their levy needs at a lower tax rate. Taxes. Changes in tax structure or public policy related to taxes may impact county finances. For example, property tax caps will limit the amount of revenue that counties receive from taxes and alter the structure of county finances. Similarly, changes in the class rates assigned to different types of property may affect a county s tax base or ability to pass property tax increases. Enterprise funds. Services provided through enterprise funds allow counties to pass the costs of the services directly to the users of the services. By using this type of accounting mechanism, counties may be able to keep level of general property taxes needed to provide services lower. Intergovernmental revenues. Fluctuations in intergovernmental revenues (federal, state, and local unit grants) can significantly impact county finances. Shifts in these sources of revenue may occur due to changes in economic conditions or public policy. For example, during times of economic downturn, state grants may decrease as state governments manage fiscal pressures and reduced revenues. D. Shared services, joint powers agreements A significant practice among counties is the sharing of services and the use of joint powers agreements to provide necessary services. Joint exercise of powers is defined in Minn. Stats. 471.59. Such arrangements allow counties to provide services jointly with other counties and thus pool their resources. Shared service arrangements are not necessarily formal; some counties provide services to other jurisdictions on an informal basis. The Office of the State Auditor does not collect information on joint powers agreements such that it would enable us to divide every expenditure by the actual recipient population figure. It is imperative, therefore, that in those instances where one county s expenditures appear higher than the average, the reader exercise caution in interpreting the numbers and investigate further into the possible sharing of services and/or the use of joint powers. 78

E. Proximity to county, regional, or state-run programs/facilities Counties that are located near regional or state-run facilities may choose to have their citizens take advantage of those facilities and services rather than provide them on their own. For example, counties located close to a regional or state park may opt not to develop or expand their own park program. Smaller counties located near larger counties may do the same. The degree of isolation experienced by a community, whether geographic or technological (e.g., lack of advanced telecommunications capability), can also affect service demands and costs. Counties that are remote may not have the opportunity to participate in joint powers arrangements or have access to urban amenities, and thus may need to provide a wider range of services out of their own budgets. F. Source of labor Numerous factors can impact local governments levels of expenditures for labor. Use of part-time employees, average age of the workforce, reliance on volunteers, unionization of workers, retention of workers, and the use of independent contractors for specific projects or general services can all affect the salary and fringe benefit costs paid by local governments. G. Other factors The effects of weather and natural disasters can significantly affect the expenditures for certain services over a period of time. Counties affected by natural disasters, such as floods, may have higher public safety, streets and highways, and infrastructure costs. There are many other incidental factors not included in this list. Explanations of differences in county expenditures should be pursued with county officials to better understand each county s expenditures. 79