Hazardous Materials in Project Development Additional Guidance

Similar documents
Environmental Audit Standards

Change is in the air with regard. feature

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING PHASE I REPORT 3264 PREPARED FOR: Mark Hopkins. Liberty Real Estate, LLC. 741 North State Road.

ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (AAI COMPLIANT PHASE I)

Voluntary standard; accepted by USEPA to comply with AAI rule. 2. Regulatory/Developmental History

Due Diligence & Environmental Compliance Issues for Tribal Energy Projects: Hazardous Waste

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process 1

The University of Texas System Systemwide Policy. Policy: UTS Title. Environmental Review for Acquisition of Real Property. 2.

Technical Information Paper No

New Environmental Diligence Standards for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI)

Environmental Due Diligence

ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE

Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for Corridors

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update Memorandum Vacant Property 1585 Santa Clara Avenue Santa Ana, California 92507

New Phase I Requirements for Real Estate Transactions: Implications of the New All Appropriate Inquiries Rule

BROWNFIELDS Connecticut All Grantee Meeting July Getting the most out of All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI)

Preparing for Negotiations: The Environmental Lawyer s Checklist In Oil and Gas Transactions

October 29, 2013 Florida Brownfields Association Conference, Orlando

Chapter XII BROWNFIELDS & BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS. A. Business Transactions

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup

SOLAR MASSACHUSETTS RENEWABLE TARGET PROGRAM (225 CMR 20.00) GUIDELINE

Sustainable development for the future of Arkansas

CERCLA Amendments Will Impact How Due Diligence is Conducted. By Larry Schnapf

EPA Issues Guidance On New CERCLA Landowner Defenses

CERCLA AMENDMENT CREATES NEW EXEMPTIONS AND DEFENSES

EPA s All Appropriate Inquiry Rule: When is Enough, Enough?

In previous editions of Environment and the

East Central Brownfields CoaliƟon Request for Services

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Standard Practice Update. West Virginia Brownfields Conference September 2013

Phase I ESAs and the USEPA's All Appropriate Inquiry Final Rule

FACT SHEET Brownfields Cleanup Program (BCP) KEY DEFINITIONS (see also ECL )

Different Levels of Environmental Site Assessment and the Benefits to M&A Due Diligence

Broker. Environmental Concerns Affecting Real Estate Transactions. Chapter 17. Copyright Gold Coast Schools 1

Highlights of USEPA All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) Final Rule and Revised ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment

Credit Risk. 72 March 2013 The RMA Journal Copyright 2013 by RMA

TARGETED BROWNFIELD ASSESSMENT

DRAFT PROPERTY TRANSFER OR CLOSURE STATUTES

July 1, 2017 HAZARDOUS SITE INVENTORY Environmental Protection Division Georgia Department of Natural Resources

Assessment. Guidance CLEANUP. Liability Release. Petroleum Brownfields Eligibility Letter Remediation Oversight. Project Endorsement

DUE DILIGENCE. Presented at. Lydia Work, Senior Chemist Licensed Remediation Specialist Triad Engineering, Inc.

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT AGGREGATE PRODUCTION ASSOCIATES PARCEL 2623 CENTER STREET OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA

USEPA Brownfield Assessment Grant Application for Financial Assistance

City of Brandon Brownfield Strategy

Proposed Laurel 2 Solar Facility Jessup Road at Vaughn & Diehl Roads Imperial County, California

Due Diligence for Property Acquisitions

ACT 381 WORK PLAN INSTRUCTIONS July 2018 TO CONDUCT ELIGIBLE DEQ ENVIRONMENTAL AND/OR MSF NON-ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES

1976 Fargo, ND City Directory - R.L. Polk & Co.

ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE AND DEFECT PROCEDURE

ASTM Phase I Changes and AAI Webinar

BROWNFIELD CLEANUP PROGRAM (BCP) APPLICATION FORM

Condemnation Summit XIX

ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE FOR TRANSFER OF REAL PROPERTY (IC ) State Form (R / 1-07) Indiana Department of Environmental Management

ENVIRONMENTAL QUESTIONNAIRE AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

DRAFT - Subject to Change. Cathedral Building 212 North Ash Street Crookston, Minnesota. Prepared For. Project FA June 29, 2011

A Primer on Environmental Due Diligence and Remedial Programs that Can Save a Real Estate Transaction

Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. Siena Lakes Site Naples, Collier County, Florida

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 1724 VINTON STREET & 2702 SOUTH 18 TH STREET OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA

Due Diligence. Jeffrey C. O Brien Mansfield, Tanick & Cohen, PA. Presented by: 2007 Mansfield Tanick & Cohen, P.A.

This edition of Environment and the Appraiser

Environmental due diligence has been an integral

Managing Environmental Risks

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 904, 911 & 1007 South 20 th Street OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT

Tonawanda Brownfield Opportunity Area

Mitigating Risk Through Environmental Due Diligence in California Real Estate Deals

LCRA BOARD POLICY 401 LAND RESOURCES. Sept. 21, 2016

Speaker 10: Matthew Joy of Jorden Bischoff & Hiser PLC Page 1 TWO RECENT DEVELOPMENTS POTENTIALLY AFFECTING REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS

FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER NAVAL RESERVE CENTER DULUTH, MINNESOTA

University of Houston Law Center. Environmental Issues in Real Estate Course #7297 SYLLABUS. Scott A. Sherman Adjunct Professor

ASTM E : Applying the New Phase I Site Assessment Standard

NDEQ Brownfields Overview. Charlene R. Sundermann Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality Voluntary Cleanup Program and Brownfield Coordinator

AGENCY SPECIFIC RECORD SCHEDULE FOR: Environmental Conservation, Dept. of

Baldwin Park Successor Agency Long-Range Property Management Plan. Prepared for:

ENFORCEMENT POLICY INCLUDING INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL ACTIVITIES DISCHARGE MANAGEMENT

DRAFT FINAL FINDING OF SUITABILITY TO TRANSFER (FOST) Little Patuxent River Parcel. October 16, 2013

Environmental. Due Diligence 9 Steps Companies Should Take to Effectively Manage. Environmental. Risks in Commercial Real Estate Deals

Minnesota s Brownfield Programs. Gary L Krueger Supervisor, Superfund/Brownfields May 23, 2018

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

Renewable Energy Development on Contaminated Properties. Liability Concerns

CITY OF VAUGHAN POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR DEALING WITH CONTAMINATED OR POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED SITES

How Many Brownfields Does California Have? by Corynn Brodsky. Where are all the brownfields? This question is posed frequently by environmental

Oregon, Brownfields, and the Land Bank and Tax Abatement Authorities. How Does It All Work And Why Cities and Counties Should Be Interested

Brownfields. Jere Trey Hess, Chief Groundwater Assessment & Remediation Division April 2015

Environmental Management Chapter

REQUEST FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST Environmental Assessment Services

Implementing a New Accounting Standard

TABLE OF CONTENTS General Legal Authority for Certification of Right of Way Control 24-2

DTSC BROWNFIELDS Services

THE REGULATIONS GOVERNING SOIL DISPLACEMENT AND DISPOSAL IN THE EAST HELENA SUPERFUND AREA IN LEWIS AND CLARK COUNTY, MONTANA.

PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT SOUTH OMAHA TERMINAL WAREHOUSE 4913 SOUTH 27 th STREET OMAHA, DOUGLAS COUNTY, NEBRASKA

Real Estate Acquisitions Audit (Green Line LRT Stage 1)

ATTACHMENT 4 CERCLA NOTICE, COVENANT, AND ACCESS PROVISIONS AND OTHER DEED PROVISIONS

Due Diligence April 10, 2018

Environmental Questionnaire

A. Threshold Criteria

Tools for Managing Potential Liabilities Associated with Contaminated Port Land. David Ashton Assistant General Counsel Port of Portland 02/13/07

IV.D.3. Location Swan Cleaners is located in the City of Mansfield, County of Richland, State of Ohio

1.1. Implements policy and assigns responsibility pursuant to Reference (a) for the disposal of real property.

EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF FELLSMERE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX D HOUSING ELEMENT

Transcription:

Hazardous Materials in Project Development Additional Guidance Contents:...2 AASHTO Guidance...3 USDOT Brownfields Guidance...4 ASTM Standard Practices...6 Hazardous Materials in Project Development 1

Disclaimer The following information has been electronically scanned, re-typed and re-formatted. TxDOT makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy or completeness of this information. For official copies of these documents, contact the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 400 7th Street S.W., Washington, DC 20590. The FHWA web page is: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/.fhwa Interim Guidance of 1988 FHWA Interim Guidance of 1988 Access the FHWA s Interim Guidance of 1988 at: http://environment.fhwa.dot.gov/guidebook/vol1/doc7g.pdf. Land Acquisition and Relocation Assistance Source: Federal Highway Administration, Region 6, Report No. R6-FH-4-010, April 18, 1994 Conclusions: States acquired right-of-way property without considering contamination in assessing property value or holding property owners responsible for cleanup costs. As a result, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) participated in property acquisition without price adjustments for contamination, and construction on Federal-aid highway projects was delayed for environmental remediation. Monetary Impact: This report contains no monetary recovery. Our recommendations were made to ensure FHWA does not participate in unnecessary acquisition and cleanup costs for properties with contamination. Recommendations: We recommend the FHWA Regional Administrator (i) require states to adopt procedures for holding property owners responsible for cleaning up hazardous waste sites or reducing fair market value of contaminated property during the appraisal process, (ii) deny Federal participation in remediation of hazardous materials when state so not consider contamination when acquiring property and do not seek recovery of cleanup costs from responsible parties, and (iii) implement procedures for monitoring state compliance with hazardous materials guidelines during FHWA process reviews. Management Position: FHWA Region 6 concurred with Recommendations 1 and 3. Actions taken and planned were reasonable. Concerning Recommendations 2, FHWA concurred, but actions planned did not address the intent of our recommendation. We asked FHWA to clarify its position on this recommendation. Hazardous Materials in Project Development 2

AASHTO Guidance Disclaimer The American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials has published the document Hazardous Waste Guidance for Project Development. To obtain a copy of this document, contact the American Association of State Highway & Transportation Officials (AASHTO) at 444 North Capitol Street N.W., Suite 249, Washington, DC 20001, Telephone: (202) 624-5800, Fax: (202) 624-5806, e-mail: info@aashto.org. The AASHTO web page is: http://www.transportation.org/aashto/home.nsf/frontpage. Hazardous Materials in Project Development 3

USDOT Brownfields Guidance Disclaimer The following information has been re-formatted from text on web sites. TxDOT makes no claims, promises or guarantees about the accuracy or completeness of this information. For official copies of these documents, contact the United States of America Department of Transportation (USDOT), 400 Seventh Street S.W., Washington, DC 20590. The USDOT web page is: http://www.dot.gov/. USDOT Policy on Brownfields Redevelopment Source: USDOT Policy on Brownfields Redevelopment, News Release, Rodney E. Slater, The Secretary of Transportation, United States of America Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 20590, April 22, 1998. Issued by: United States of America Department of Transportation, The Secretary of Transportation, Washington, D.C. 20590 USDOT Policy on Brownfields Redevelopment: Protect and enhance communities and the natural environment affected by transportation U.S. Department of Transportation Strategic Goal. The Department of Transportation is committed to supporting transportationrelated redevelopment of brownfields -- lightly contaminated, abandoned, industrial or commercial properties -- as part of our efforts to improve communities through transportation investments. Through leadership and financial assistance programs, the Department of Transportation encourages state and local transportation agencies to address community brownfields redevelopment in transportation planning, and other project redevelopment processes. Transportation agencies should ensure that planning considers: access to planned brownfield redevelopment; and new partnerships with state and local environmental and economic development entities to attract additional resources and leverage transportation funds. States, localities, and transit agencies are provided the flexibility to participate, where appropriate, in transportation projects that include the reuse of brownfields sites. This changes the long-standing policy that called for avoiding contaminated sites where possible. Instead, brownfields sites can be used if they meet all other appropriate criteria and are consistent with a specific transportation project. Federal and state policy changes have reduced liability concerns and stringent cleanup requirements that long discouraged use of these properties. Returning brownfields to productive use creates a foundation for new economic opportunities and revitalized communities. Transportation can be key in the redevelopment of brownfields for several reasons. First, redeveloped brownfields need good transportation access. Second, transportation-related uses should be among the possibilities considered for brownfields site redevelopment. Third, in many cases, redevelopment allows the use of existing infrastructure and services, Hazardous Materials in Project Development 4

eliminating the cost of new public investment. Fourth, partnerships between Federal, state and local transportation, economic development and environmental interests can leverage additional funding resources for transportation-related brownfields redevelopment. Transportation is more than asphalt, concrete and steel. We must ensure that our transportation investments not only promote mobility, but also strong economies and healthy natural environments valued by our communities. This policy will contribute to the reuse of idle, blighted land, conservation of open space, better transportation and the economic growth and health of our Nation s communities. USDOT FHWA Policy Revision Access the U.S. Department of Transportation s FHWA Policy Revision at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bnfldmem.htm FHWA and FTA Policy and Information Access the U.S. Department of Transportation s FHWA and FTA Policy and Information at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bf_disc.htm. Hazardous Materials in Project Development 5

ASTM Standard Practices Environmental Site Assessment Process The American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) established the following standard or practice for environmental site assessments (ESAs) in commercial real estate transactions to standardize "Environmental Due Diligence" or All Appropriate Inquiry : ASTM E 1528-00 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Transaction Screen Process (Transaction Screen) ASTM E 1527-05 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (Phase I ESA). This ASTM standard was established to define the extent and limit of "all appropriate inquiry" as indicated in the phrase "good commercial or customary practice in the marketplace," which is defined in 42 U.S.C. 9601(35)(B) for CERCLA liability and defense provisions. The ASTM standard was established to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with property, to the extent feasible pursuant to ASTM E 1527. ASTM defines the term "recognized environmental condition" as the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. Additionally, ASTM standard practices for environmental site assessments do not address every environmental concern that could be encountered. Additional services outside the scope of the ASTM standards must be specified in the terms of the contract or proposal for the environmental site assessment. Examples of services outside the scope of work for ASTM standards include: a broader scope of assessment, more detailed conclusions, liability/risk evaluations, recommendations for further testing, remediation techniques, asbestos surveys and lead-based paint testing. The ASTM E 1528-00 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments is an assessment to be utilized for limited environmental due diligence. It does not meet the requirement of all appropriate inquiry. ASTM has developed the following guide for further testing: ASTM E 1903-97 Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment. Hazardous Materials in Project Development 6

ASTM E 1528 Transaction Screen Process The ASTM E 1528 Transaction Screen Process (Transaction Screen) standard practice consists of a questionnaire and corresponding guide. The questionnaire includes three areas of inquiry: 1) interviews with the owner and/or operator of the property, 2) site visit and 3) review of government records and historical sources. The Transaction Screen may be conducted either by the user (including an agent or employee of the user) or an environmental professional. ASTM defines the term "environmental professional" as one with sufficient training and experience to investigate a site in accordance with the standard practice and the ability to draw conclusions regarding the site's environmental condition. According to ASTM, if a Transaction Screen is conducted on a pristine property the user should be able to answer all questions in the negative and reasonably conclude that no further inquiry is necessary. The user must exercise "business judgment" to determine whether the environmental condition of the property has been adequately assessed. When there is no response or an unknown or affirmative response, the user must decide whether further inquiry is warranted. The reason for this conclusion must be documented. If further inquiry is needed, then the user should proceed with the advice and guidance of an "environmental professional." Incorporating state regulatory database information for Texas, an ASTM 1528 Transaction Screen includes the following: limited records review, including: National Priority List (NPL) Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation Liability Information System (CERLCIS) Resource Compensation Recovery Act Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (RCRA TSDF) Texas Superfund Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks (LPST) Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks (RPST) Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (MSWLF) limited historical land use research, including: fire insurance maps or local fire department interview site visit (reconnaissance) property owner and occupants (if applicable) interviews 20 standardized questions documentation (questionnaire). Access an online Document Summary of ASTM E 1528 at: http://www.astm.org/cgibin/softcart.exe/database.cart/redline_pages/e1528.htm?l+mystore+tdfm115 2. Hazardous Materials in Project Development 7

ASTM E 1527 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment According to ASTM, the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) is a more comprehensive assessment than the Transaction Screen and should be performed by an environmental professional (as defined earlier). The duties of the environmental professional include three tasks: (1) interviews and site reconnaissance, (2) review and interpretation of information and (3) oversight of writing the report. The Phase I ESA consists of the following four components: (1) a more thorough review of records, (2) site visit, (3) interviews with the owner and/or operator of the property and (4) report documentation. Incorporating state regulatory database information for Texas, an ASTM 1527 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment includes the following: records review/list search, including: National Priority List (NPL) Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation Liability Information System (CERCLIS) CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action is Planned (NFRAP) facilities Resource Compensation Recovery Act Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (RCRA TSD) Resource Compensation Recovery Act Corrective Action Facilities (RCRA CORRACTS) RCRA non-corracts TSD Texas Superfund Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks (LPST) Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (MSWLF) Resource Compensation Recovery Act Generators Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks (RPST) Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) additional environmental record sources (discretional), including: physical setting review USGS 7.5 minute topographic map (mandatory) other geologic, hydrogeologic and soil surveys or maps (discretional) historical land use research (reasonably ascertainable), including: aerial photographs USGS 7.5 minute topographic maps fire insurance maps local street directories property tax files Hazardous Materials in Project Development 8

building department records recorded land title records zoning/land use records site visit (reconnaissance) interviews with: owners and occupants local government officials evaluation documentation (written report). Access an online Document Summary of ASTM E 1537 at: http://www.astm.org/cgibin/softcart.exe/database.cart/redline_pages/e1527.htm?l+mystore+tdfm115 2+1131510313. ASTM Phase II Environmental Site Assessment Similar to AASHTO's preliminary site investigation or an environmental site investigation, a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment is a more detailed investigation requiring sampling and analysis. The purpose of the Phase II investigation is to estimate the nature and extent of contamination and to provide the basis for a preliminary assessment of the cost of corrective or preventive action. ASTM has developed a Standard Guide for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ASTM E1903-97). This guide provides a framework for employing good commercial and customary practices when performing a Phase II environmental site assessment on a parcel of commercial property. For More Information For more information or to purchase copyrighted practices contact ASTM International at 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA 19428-2959. The ASTM web page is located at: http://www.astm.org/. Hazardous Materials in Project Development 9