City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

Administration Report Fiscal Year 2016/2017. Hesperia Unified School District Community Facilities District No June 20, 2016.

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3992

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3970

$4,115,000 City of Wheeling, West Virginia (Stone Building Renovation Project) TAX INCREMENT REVENUE BONDS SERIES 2005 A

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4779

Village of Palm Springs

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No. AO

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3968

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

Table of Contents. Sections. Tables. Appendices

IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY MEASURE City of Emeryville

RESOLUTION NUMBER 3928

PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

13.1% over Cash Balance Brought Forward $12,877,300 Taxes Other Revenues Total Revenues and Other Financing Sources

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE

Bonds at their respective maturities, to the extent such principal and interest is not satisfied from the proceeds of the sales and use tax; and

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 91-2 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD (Rosetta Canyon Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

THE VILLAGE AT LITCHFIELD PARK COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and Council as follows:

2011 ANNUAL REPORT. 1. The Audited Financial Statements of the Capistrano Unified School District June 30, 2011.

SAN FRANCISCO WATER DEPARTMENT AND HETCH HETCHY WATER AND POWER. Statement of Changes in the Balancing Account. June 30, 2007

CITY OF TEMPLE TERRACE, FLORIDA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS TAXABLE NON AD VALOREM REVENUE BOND(S) (Not to Exceed $24,000,000) RFP DATED: February 9, 2018

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (OJAI)

REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Lake Buena Vista, Florida SECONDARY MARKET DISCLOSURE

Harris Ranch Community Infrastructure District No. 1. Feasibility Report Special Assessment Bonds (Assessment Area One)

City of Fillmore. Community Facilities District No.5 Improvement Area A (Heritage Valley Parks) $17,155,000 Special Tax Bonds, 2015 Series

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY TOWN COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE

CITY OF. DATE: August 23, Mayor and City Council TO: Leif J. Ahnell, C.P.A., C.G.F.O. City Manager FROM:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Town Council of the Town of Corte Madera as follows:

ANNUAL TOWNSHIP BUDGET For the Year Ending December 31, 2019 Township. Burleigh County, North Dakota C) TOTAL RESOURCES AVAILABLE

Middle Village Community Development District

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD 98-1 (Summerhill Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

CRA/LA, a Designated Local Authority Successor Agency to The Community Redevelopment Agency of The City of Los Angeles

CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF HANOVER, N.H.

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD, ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES:

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public

The Basics of Municipal Leasing

2017 PUBLIC FINANCE HANDBOOK FOR TEXAS COUNTIES TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES

EXHIBIT B COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (NORTH VINEYARD STATION NO. 1)

Assembly Bill No. 489 Committee on Growth and Infrastructure CHAPTER...

Community Facilities District Report. Jurupa Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 13. September 14, 2015

FOR TEXAS COUNTIES 2016

ORDINANCE NO NOW THEREFORE the Council of the City of Flowery Branch hereby ordains as follows:

CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO BONDHOLDERS. City of Miami, Florida

Steven J. Pinkerton, Housing and Redevelopment Director

RESOLUTION NO

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE. ORDINANCE No

Majorca Isles Community Development District August 14, 2018

REFINANCE 2004 CERTIFICATE OF PARTICIPATION 22 (COP) (Resolution No )

County of Santa Clara Finance Agency Controller-Treasurer

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

TOWN OF PALM BEACH Information for Town Council Meeting on: July 12, 2017

REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Lake Buena Vista, Florida

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Lake Buena Vista, Florida

Referred to Committee on Taxation

SACRAMENTO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF AIRPORTS

SECOND AMENDED RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAXES FOR TUSTIN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO

CAPISTRANO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT

Agenda Item No. 6B January 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, City Manager

Santa Clara Valley Water District Page 1 of 2

PAMELA ARENDS -KING, FINANCE DIRECTOR /CITY TREASURER ADOPT RESOLUTION NO APPOINTING CERTAIN PARTIES TO

Spartanburg County School District Six, SC

AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO BONDHOLDERS

Grants Management Division

S 0989 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

2015 SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT TO BONDHOLDERS

ASSEMBLY, No. 326 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 217th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2016 SESSION

LANDMARK AT DORAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2019 PROPOSED BUDGET PREPARED MAY 10, 2018

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT

CITY OF HIALEAH, FLORIDA. Annual Report of Financial Information and Operating Data for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2017

Referred to Committee on Revenue and Economic Development. FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government: May have Fiscal Impact. Effect on the State: Yes.

IC Chapter 15. Public Safety Communications Systems and Computer Facilities Districts

EAST NASSAU STEWARDSHIP DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2019 ADOPTED BUDGET PREPARED JULY 31, 2018

TOWN OF WINDSOR TOWN COUNCIL

Texas Comptroller s Annual Local Debt Report Table of Contents. 1 - Contact Information. 2 - Individual Debt Obligations

PURSUANT TO AB 1484 AND AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION TO THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE

Table of Contents. General Fund Budget Account Category Descriptions 1. Debt Service Fund Budget Account Category Descriptions 4

SARASOTA NATIONAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PROPOSED BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 2019 PREPARED APRIL 10, 2018

AMENDED AND RESTATED MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE SUNSET DATE FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAM TO DECEMBER 31, 2016; AND

$990,000 Calaveras County Water District

AN ACT RELATING TO PROPERTY; LIMITING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS IN PUBLIC

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT & VETERANS AFFAIRS ANALYSIS LOCAL LEGISLATION

WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE CHAPTER 7 PROPERTY TAX VALUATION METHODOLOGY AND ASSESSMENT (DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENTS)

Transcription:

City of Palo Alto (ID # 3972) City Council Staff Report Report Type: Consent Calendar Meeting Date: 8/5/2013 Summary Title: Establishing GO Bond Tax Levy Title: Adoption of Resolution Establishing Fiscal Year 2013-14 Secured and Unsecured Property Tax Levy for the City of Palo Alto s General Obligation Bond Indebtedness (Measure N) From: City Manager Lead Department: Administrative Services Recommendation Adopt a resolution (Attachment A) approving the establishment of the Fiscal Year 2013-14 property tax levy of $17.72 per $100,000 in Assessed Value (AV) for the secured and utility tax roll and $12.88 per $100,000 in AV for the unsecured tax roll for the City of Palo Alto's Measure N General Obligation Bond Library Bonds (First and Second Series). Background On November 4, 2008, City voters passed Measure N which gave the City authority to issue a maximum amount of $76,000,000 million of General Obligation bonds (the "Bonds") for capital improvements to the Mitchell Park, Downtown, and Main libraries and to the Mitchell Park community center. The City successfully sold the Bonds in two series to provide $76 million in funds for the design and construction costs. Both Standard and Poor's (S&P) and Moody's awarded their highest credit ratings, Triple A, to both series of Bonds. Discussion Debt service payments on these Bonds are paid through ad valorem taxes on all taxable land and improvements (both secured and unsecured assessment roll) within the City. Staff is seeking Council approval of the attached resolution (Attachment A) which authorizes the placement of an ad valorem property tax levy in the amount of $0.01772 per $100 or $17.72 per $100,000 in AV for the secured tax roll; and $0.01288 per $100 or $12.88 per $100,000 in AV for the unsecured tax roll. In comparison, prior years secured and unsecured tax levy was $12.88 and $15.51, respectively, per $100,000 of AV. City of Palo Alto Page 1

The assessment rate for FY 2013-14 is increasing for the secured and dropping for the unsecured property taxes. For the secured property taxes, the second Bond series issuance done in June 2013 resulted in total annual debt service payment of $4.8 million, an increase of $1.3 million. There were several factors that moderated the rate increase: the rise in the Assessed Valuation for properties throughout Palo Alto and the application of a bond issuance premium that was realized at the time the Library Bonds were issued. The latter requires an explanation and how staff intends to apply it to the annual assessment over the remaining life of the Bonds. General Obligation Bonds are unique in that they must be issued, by Government Code, at a par value that does not include an amount to pay the underwriting fee. To generate this fee and to market the bonds, interest rates on the bonds to be paid to investors were set slightly higher than the market rates. The par amount of bonds issued in June 2010 and June 2013 was $55.3 million and 20.7 million, respectively. Of this amount, $75.8 million was deposited into the Project Fund for the projects described above and $0.2 million paid for cost of issuances expenses on the first series bonds (e.g., disclosure counsel, rating agencies). As a consequence of the interest rates to be paid on the bonds and investor demand, a premium of $4.8 million was generated. Of this, $0.8 million went for the underwriter s discount and $0.2 million for cost of issuance expenses on the second series bonds leaving $3.8 million in remaining premiums. The remaining premium must be used to offset annual debt service. In effect, use of the premium lowers the true interest cost to property owners to that cited at the time of the bond issuances, 4.2 percent for the 2010 (first series) and 3.85 percent for the 2013 (second series) Bonds. Based on the 30 year life of the bonds, staff will amortize the $3.8 million in premiums over 30 years or offset the annual assessment by $126,985 per year. In addition, the rise in Assessed Valuation resulted in $0.2 million in excess collection which is being used to further offset the FY 2014 annual assessment. As for the unsecured property taxes, per the County of Santa Clara s methodology, the prior year s secured tax rate becomes this year s unsecured tax rate. As a result, the unsecured tax rate for FY 2014 doesn t include the 2013 Bonds issuance s annual debt service payment and is also benefiting by the lower secured tax rate from last year due to offsetting impacts of using premiums and excess assessment collection due to (again) rising Assessed Valuation during the fiscal year. With the new assessment for FY 2013-14, a house with an assessed value of $1 million, for example, would see an annual assessment of $177.20 on their property tax bill. City of Palo Alto Page 2

A summary of the 2013 Bonds issuance funding and application of funds are as follows: The $180,000 applied towards the Costs of Issuance breakdown as follows: Resource Impact The bond issuances result in a 2014 calendar year debt service expenditure of approximately $4.8 million and Council approval of the attached resolution will result in ad valorem tax levy revenue of $4.5 million with the difference attributable to available funds on hand being applied toward the 2013 calendar year debt service payments. Again, secured and unsecured property owners will see a levy of $17.72 and $12.88 per $100,000 of AV on their 2013-14 property tax statement. Environmental Review There is no environmental review required for this report. Attachments: Attachment A: Resolution Establishing FY 2013-14 Property Tax Levy (PDF) City of Palo Alto Page 3

Exhibit 1: General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2008, Series 2010 and 2013 Tax Rate Calculation Based on 2013-14 AV (PDF) City of Palo Alto Page 4

NOT YET APPROVED Resolution No. Resolution of the Council of the City of Palo Alto Establishing the Fiscal Year 2013-14 Property Tax Levy of $17.72 Per $100,000 of Secured and $12.88 Per $100,000 of Unsecured Assessed Valuations for the City s General Obligation Bond Indebtedness (Measure N Library Projects) R E C I T A L S A. The City of Palo Alto s ( City ) general election held on November 4, 2008, more than two thirds of voters approved Measure N, authorizing the issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount not to exceed $76,000,000 (the Authorization ) to fund construction of a new Mitchell Park Library and Community center and renovation and improvements to Downtown and Main libraries. B. Pursuant to the Authorization, the City issued two series (Series 2010A and 2013A) of general obligation bonds in June 2010 and June 2013 that yielded $75.8 million for project needs. C. The City is obligated to levy ad valorem taxes on all property within the City subject to taxation by the City, without limitation on rate or amount (except with respect to certain personal property which is taxed at limited rates), for the payment of the debt service on the Bonds. D. The City is obligated to direct the County of Santa Clara to collect such ad valorem taxes in such amounts and at such times as is necessary to ensure the timely payment of debt service on the Bonds. E. The amount of the annual ad valorem tax levied by the City to repay the Bonds is determined by the relationship between the assessed valuation of taxable property in the City and the amount of debt service due on the bonds. The Council of the City of Palo Alto RESOLVES as follows: SECTION 1. Pursuant to the Authorization, an ad valorem property tax is hereby established to be levied on all land and improvements in the City of Palo Alto during fiscal year 2013-14 in the amount of $0.01772 per $100 in assessed value for the secured and utility tax roll and $0.01288 per $100 in assessed value for the unsecured tax roll based on the calculations set forth in the attached Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. The City s Director of Administrative Services shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution to be delivered to the Auditor of the County of Santa Clara for entry in the assessment book of the respective sums in dollars and cents. 130722 jb 0131117 1

NOT YET APPROVED SECTION 3. The Council finds that this is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. INTRODUCED AND PASSED: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Senior Asst. City Attorney Mayor APPROVED: City Manager Director of Administrative Services / CFO 130722 jb 0131117 2

City of Palo Alto General Obligation Bonds, Election of 2008, Series 2010 and 2013 Tax Rate Calculation Based on 2013-14 Assessed Values Exhibit A A) Assessed Valuations (AV) 1) 2013-14 Taxable Secured Assessed Valuation (AV) $ 24,042,136,429.00 2) 2013-14 Taxable Unsecured AV $ 1,499,187,999.00 3 ) Less: Estimated Delinquency 1.02% (15,291,717.59) 4 ) Net Taxable Unsecured AV 1,483,896,281.41 B) Tax Levy Requirement 5) 2013-14 Debt Service Payments 6) 2010 Bonds February 1,2014 $ 1,222,234.38 7) 2010 Bonds August 1, 2014 2,272,234.38 3,494,468.76 8) 2013 Bonds February 1,2014 $ 497,904.17 9) 2013 Bonds August 1, 2014 786,850.00 1,284,754.17 10 ) Total Calendar Year 2013 Debt Service Payment 4,779,222.93 11 ) Excess Funds on Hand Applied Toward Debt Servce (338,984.64) 12 ) Sub-total 4,440,238.29 13 ) Santa Clara County Administration Fee (0.25% of Principal & Interest) 11,100.60 14 ) Total 2013-14 Annual Debt Service Requirement 4,451,338.89 C) Secured and Unsecured Tax Rate 15 ) 2013-14 Unsecured Tax Rate per $100 of Unsecured AV (Prior Year's Secured Tax Rate) $ 0.01288 16 ) 2013-14 Unsecured Tax Rate per $100,000 of Unsecured AV $ 12.88 17 ) 2013-14 Estimated Revenue from Unsecured AV (line 4 divide by 100 times by line 12) $ 191,125.84 18 ) 2013-14 Estimated Revenue from Secured AV (line 11 minus line 13) 4,260,213.04 19 ) Total 2013-14 Annual Debt Service Requirement $ 4,451,338.89 20 ) 2013-14 Secured Tax Rate per $100 of Secured AV (line 14 divided by line 1*100) $ 0.01772 21 ) 2013-14 Secured Tax Rate per $100,000 of Secured AV (line 14 divided by line 1 times 100,000) $ 17.72