Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings

Similar documents
Rule of corner may need to be flexible i.e. context school, park. With a clustered approach. Should row housing go where fourplexes are?

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

Plan Dutch Village Road

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

Accessory Coach House

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

April 3 rd, Monitoring the Infill Zoning Regulations. Review of Infill 1 and 2 and Proposed Changes

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

1202 & 1204 Avenue Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control

Address: 2025 Agassiz Road Applicant: Cristian Anca. RM5 Medium Density Multiple Housing

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Part 9 Specific Land Uses - Dual Occupancy

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

Side Setback Amendments to the (RF3) Small Scale Infill Development Zone Options to amend side setbacks for Row Housing

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT CODEAU BUILDING LTD RIDEAU STREET OTTAWA DECEMBER 2013

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

TOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages

Urban Design Brief. Proposed Medical / Dental Office 1444 Adelaide Street North. Vireo Health Facility Ltd.

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

5. Housing. Other Relevant Policies & Bylaws. Several City-wide policies guide our priorities for housing diversity at the neighbourhood level: Goals

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Urban Design Brief 6233, 6237, 6241 and 6245 Main Street, Stouffville Pace Savings and Credit Union June 15, 2012

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

Development Permit Application

RM2 Low Density Row Housing RM3 Low Density Multiple Housing

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE

RT-3 District Schedule

Truax Park Apartments

RM-8 and RM-8N Districts Schedule

RT-6 District Schedule

BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017

Planning Justification Report

Self-Guided Walking Tours Ground-oriented Housing Types. Cedar Cottage Tour Cambie Corridor Phase 3

An Introduction to the City of Winnipeg s New Zoning By-Law

Policy and Standards for Public Local Residential Streets And Private Streets

Self-Guided Walking Tours Ground-oriented Housing Types. Mt. Pleasant Tour Cambie Corridor Phase 3

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

RT-11 and RT-11N Districts Schedules

LAND USE AMENDMENT ITEM NO: 05

6040 Bathurst Street and 5 Fisherville Road Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application Preliminary Report

200 St. Clair Ave W - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

RT-7 District Schedule

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

RT-8 District Schedule

INFILL DEVELOPMENT. Elective Course January 14, 2017 Derek Pomreinke Tammy Henry Nazim Virani

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

Accessory Dwelling Units

RM-7, RM-7N and RM-7AN Districts Schedules

Corporate Report. Report from Planning and Building Services, Planning Services. Date of Report: March 17, 2015 Date of Meeting: April 13, 2015

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

CITY OF VANCOUVER POLICY REPORT DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

507, 509 and 511 Kingston Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

8.14 Single Detached with Granny Flat or Coach House Edgemere

RT-5 and RT-5N Districts Schedule

111 Wenderly Drive Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES. Decision Issue Date Thursday, March 22, 2018

Requirements for accepted development and assessment benchmarks for assessable development

Zoning Amendment. Public Meeting: February 7, 2018

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

Chair and Members of Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel. A0596/16TEY Yonge St New 5 Storey Non-residential Building

AGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome

Part 9 Specific Land Uses - Multi Dwelling Housing

ADMINISTRATION RECOMMENDATION(S) 2017 July 27. That Calgary Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the proposed Land Use Amendment.

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

566 Hilson Ave & 148 Clare St., Ottawa Planning Rationale June 20 th, 2014 Prepared by Rosaline J. Hill, B.E.S., B.Arch., O.A.A.

Sherwood Forest (Trinity) Housing Corporation. Urban Design Brief

SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas. Community and Corporate Services Committee

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Section Low Density Residential (R1) Land Use District

THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND BYLAW NUMBER 2065, A Bylaw to Amend Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

1. Multi-family dwellings, including town homes, apartments, or condominiums.

13 Major Nodes Introduction General

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

A.2 MOTION. 2. RM-8 and RM-8N Guidelines. MOVER: Councillor. SECONDER: Councillor

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

Combined Zoning/Minor Variance and Boulevard Parking Agreement Exception

Ashcroft Homes Trim Road Development Planning Rationale

Transcription:

Fourplex Ensure privacy of adjacent back yards window Location on the edge of neighbourhood is more Consistent design to blend in with existing street placement: minimal overlook Closer to arterial road appropriate Family-oriented Fit with existing scale, character, design Ensure privacy of existing property owners Family-oriented, affordable Good design criteria used Privacy Closer to school Corner lots should be developed Family or senior oriented In character with existing buildings Screening to adjacent houses Near school Located on corner lots oriented to long side of block or access from both streets Across from park so it should be family friendly and school Form, character compatible with neighbourhood Height and siting should not cause loss of sunlight access to neighbouring lots (privacy) Should be located on corner site more curb to take advantage of 2 front faces Setbacks consistent with neighbourhood Closer to transit Existing ARP densities should be respected Sensitive to scale of surrounding streetscape Shading Denser than duplex within 1 block of bus stop Reason for increase in density from developer Articulation of building as separate units Far from commercial Don t put a duplex on every site or you ll end up with de facto RF7 zoning Front door access Spread small scale infill around the community High quality building relationship to park Each unit should have front door onto frontage of street Lane access to parking only Input from greater community New construction should not look like existing buildings Separate entryways to the street so they are welded to the not a grey box street Parking Front door contributes to sense of community, ease of On-site parking should be managed to conform to MNO Material: siding vs. stucco negotiable, thoughtful community access regulations Liveability: basement units not in a basement Soundproofing within building Lot coverage Maximum 40% site coverage Parking should conform to the pattern in the neighbourhood (preference is for parking to be in the lane) Should be parking off alley (no front driveways) garages for each unit Underground parking from lane Not back/front (up/down preferred) MNO site coverage should be maintained Off-street parking One off street (back garage/car port) parking unit Continuation of enjoyment of neighbouring properties Potential for landscaping should be similar Improved landscaping Front yard setbacks should be comparable Backyard access for each unit Yard/ green space for each of the four units No islanding SFH Existing property not let rundown prior to development Create acceptance ratio for mix of housing type per neighbourhood control transience Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street Provide service through lanes Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings Don t include in the middle of a block (end of block) Input from adjacent properties Context of block not just lot 1

Row housing Due concern for overlooking issues due to decks/ Lot coverage maximum building fits within footprint - in balconies character with neighbourhood Access to arterials Outer edge location is good Family oriented Better on the perimeter of a neighbourhood/ arterials/ collectors Designed for family i.e. 50% of row house units (mix design) Must have back doors to yards Control the green space Closer to school and transit Contributes to good mix of housing Families closer to school and transit Group them in one block on outer edge not disbursed throughout the neighbourhood. This will allow for provision of amenity (comprehensive development) Apply Mature Neighbourhood Overlay Form and design - high quality and appropriate Increase side yards (fourplex also) Seniors closer to commercial and transit No row housing at the centre of the community Maximum number of fourplexes within block/ certain % Upscale development preferred Near transit/ commercial amenity Would invite a domino effect if you allow too many on a block Acceptable, but must be done well and look classy Location adjacent to commercial is also better Preference to corner sites Establish a ratio Attention to detail of rear façade (no flat walls) Corner location would be better % limited Design, design, design Address parking Locate on a corner Never more than one on a block Blocks in succession not acceptable Fits with existing neighbourhood character Consistent setback perception of row housing being adjacent to street regardless of context Locate away from other fourplex development Some profit to community contribution Avoid isolating single-family parcel Do not isolate a single family house between row housing buildings Involvement of and consultation with nearest neighbours Don t isolate SFH Establish a distance between fourplexes 2

Small lot infill Concerned with lot size changing character of Limitations on size of garage relates to maximum site neighbourhood coverage Should be close to schools Outer edge, close to commercial Fit into neighbourhood character Maximum lot coverage Should be compatible Safe distance between houses Height consistent with neighbours Maintain sufficient green space MNO i.e. setbacks Possible location on corner lots should be located on corner lots Maximum number on block (first guy in wins) (controversial 2 for, 2 against) Input from surrounding property owners More desirable type of infill than all of the other types Character and fit to surroundings proposed Parking should be incorporated into structure of house (not a separate garage) Architectural variety not three of the same house No front driveways If meets needs of a variety of types of people then okay Maintain boulevards 3

Duplex Keep family-oriented housing so kids are still in the No loss of enjoyment of property for neighbouring owners Design is key (design principles) Close to school Corner lot on outer edge neighbourhood (keeps the school open) No blank walls This is encouraging families to locate in neighbourhood Predictability Design to minimize shade impacts for neighbours Must have onsite garage parking. No FDG Side-by-side encourages family (social) interaction Has to fit in scale height, character, and design Well designed that fits in with the existing neighbourhood On-site parking required (i.e. a rear garage in this context) Family-oriented dictate number of bedrooms? Ensure it is compatible Significant curb appeal No car access across sidewalk Family-oriented units with yard space Garage entries should conform to the rest of the Should reflect the character of the neighbourhood neighbourhood style Should be developed so not a starter home Maximum lot coverage limit Grading issue must be kept consistent w/ neighbourhood (avoid drainage and height issues for neighbours) Consistent setback Maximum number on block encourage diversity Maintain mature vegetation (trees) Common walls must be sound proof (other forms as well) Principles of fourplex apply Consistent regulation for garbage storage/ pickup and size no bins Abutting neighbours informed Encourage asymmetry and character 4

Secondary Dwellings Same principles as above: form, character, siting, privacy, shading Within block of transit stop Corner or street access Same rules apply as for secondary suites Sensitivity to neighbours (shadow concern) Parking Okay anywhere lots are large enough Don t want a whole block full of these conversions, there has to be a broader plan in place. Must be built to code Maximum 30-40% increase in density for a block (not over 50%) 1.5 storey max to minimize impact on neighbours Don t convert an old garage, you can only build a new dwelling on a new building (i.e. garage) 5

Secondary suite BUILDING/Design SITE BLOCK NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT Separate entrances encouraged cultural (one common Buildings should be to high standard in terms of code area is okay) (safety, light, air, etc.) Close to school Can be located anywhere in the neighbourhood *primary owner must live in house not revenue property Secondary suites only in new homes (so we can ensure it s built to code) Lots should be disbursed/ non-contiguous Must be owner occupied to have a suite No physical change visible No relaxation of building/ safety codes Green space access (can be common) Owner occupied in order to permit secondary suite Should be a legal suite and to code Cap on number of unrelated occupants in dwelling Must meet building code regulations. (fire, egress) Has to be alley parking (on-site for both) Parking should be a consideration (should be provided on site) Elevations required part of permit package Complete development package sent to abutting Density is not the only concern. It is highly related to design Sufficient on-lot parking neighbours Design compatibility with neighbours Parking requirement should be met Input from neighbouring property owners abutting Restrictions on overnight street parking? property owners have most influence Poor design = declining property value which can lead to increasing redevelopment Preserve the integrity of the single lot (no land banking and Poor accommodation can lead to increased crime rates then amalgamating lots for one big project) Additive effect (principles need to deal with the additive effect) Code restrictions to prevent the lots/ homes from becoming slums Will address the housing shortage Provides a starter home option Should be integrated in a rational and planned way 6