Crawford Square. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Project Type: Residential. Case No: C Year: 1999

Similar documents
Orenco Station. Hillsboro, Oregon. Project Type: Residential. Case No: C Year: 1999

Truax Park Apartments

Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

Clayton Lane. Denver, Colorado. Project Type: Mixed-Use/Multi-Use. Case No: C Year: 2006

Sherwood Forest (Trinity) Housing Corporation. Urban Design Brief

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request.

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA THAT the Commission adopts the agenda for the January 17, 2018 meeting of the Advisory Planning Commission.

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

NORTHWEST QUADRANT NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

Introduction. General Development Standards

From Policy to Reality

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

Residential Design Guide Appendices

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

3.0 Project Description

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

MEADOWBROOK FLATS SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION

880 P Street, NW CityMarket at O Phase 2 West Apartments

1202 & 1204 Avenue Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

VOLUME 27 NUMBER 2 JANUARY-MARCH 1997 RESIDENTIAL NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK PROJECT TYPE

Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

PLNPCM : Attached Garage Regulations for Residential Districts ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT

DAW PLAZA ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

These design guidelines were adopted by: Knoxville-Knox County Metropolitan Planning Commission on August 10, 2000 Knoxville Historic Zoning

Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings

COMMERCIAL ELEMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT

TOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages

Planning Justification Report

February 1, City of Verona Planning & Development 111 Lincoln Street Verona, WI 53593

UrbanFootprint Place Types. Urban Mixed Use. Urban Residential. Urban Commercial. Residential 1% SF Large Lot 0%

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE PETERS TOWNSHIP PLANNING DEPARTMENT JUNE, E. McMURRAY ROAD McMURRAY, PA 1531 (724)

Schilling Farms. Multi-Family Land Opportunity

CITY OF FARMERSVILLE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA November 17, :30 P.M. 1, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL

Overview. Central Street Master Plan. Appendix B: Zoning

Outline of Land Use Bylaw, 1P2007 Changes

70 Parker Hill Avenue Development. 70 Parker Hill Avenue Mission Hill. Application for Small Project Review Submitted to the

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Missing Middle Housing in Practice

Chair to close public hearing. Review Deadline: 60 Days: 8/18/ Days: 10/17/2017

Oriental Warehouse. San Francisco, California. Project Type: Residential. Case No: C Year: 2000

VOLUME 24 NUMBER 18 OCTOBER-DECEMBER 1994 OFFICE 225 HIGH RIDGE ROAD STAMFORD, CONNECTICUT PROJECT TYPE

ARTICLE C. ZONING TEXT, DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS AND BOUNDARIES

Suburban Sprawl: Exposing Hidden Costs, Identifying Innovations. Summary

Table of Contents. Concept Plan Overview. Statement of Compliance with Design Guidelines. Statement of Compliance with Comprehensive Plan

LILLIAN WEBB PARK DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. City of Norcross, Georgia 2034 Comprehensive Plan

Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting #7 West Anaheim Youth Center May 26, 2016

Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP)

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

BUILDING HEIGHTS. The following diagram depicts the maximum allowable building height in a +3 zone.

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Travis Parker, Planning Director DATE: April 4, 2018 Lakewood Zoning Amendments Housing and Mixed Use

CITY OF KAMLOOPS BYLAW NO A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW OF THE CITY OF KAMLOOPS

PARRAMORE OAKS FRAMEWORK PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA Clarendon Boulevard Conference Rooms C & D Arlington, VA 22201

Seth Mallen, Vice President Maximus Real Estate Partners 525 Florida Street, Ste. 150 San Francisco, CA November 10, 2015

Land Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee of Denver City Council FROM: Scott Robinson, Senior City Planner DATE: December 6, 2018 RE:

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: April 1, 2019

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

SUBJECT: Application for Planned Unit Development and Rezoning 1725 Winnetka Road

Anthem Park at Uptown Village

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

3.1 Existing Built Form

WRT. October 16, Arthur Collins President Collins Enterprises, LLC 2001 West Main Street, Suite 175 Stamford, CT 06902

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

City of Sunny Isles Beach Collins Avenue Sunny Isles Beach, Florida 33160

COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA NOVEMBER 1, 2016, 2016 MEETING

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

BRIGHOUSE UNITED CHURCH BENNETT ROAD

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

Chapter MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS

Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update

Chapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS

Meruelo Maddux Properties

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

Puyallup Downtown Planned Action & Code Changes. January 10, 2017

The Philadelphia Code. In order to be eligible for any floor area bonuses pursuant to this section:

SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

Appendix D - Manheim Township Zoning Ordinance

Director, Community Planning, North York District NNY 10 OZ and NNY 10 RH

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Director, Community Planning, South District

Re: 101 and 105 Champagne: Building 2 Parking Requirements Study

Transcription:

Crawford Square Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Project Type: Residential Case No: C029013 Year: 1999 SUMMARY Crawford Square is an 18-acre residential development located on the eastern edge of downtown Pittsburgh that provides a gateway between the downtown business district and the nearby Hill District and creates a new and vital neighborhood recalling the architectural traditions of the neighborhoods to which it is connected. Crawford Square provides quality mixed-income housing in a friendly, pedestrian-oriented neighborhood to residents with a wide range of incomes. The project's street grid is an extension of the Hill District street grid, stitched into the fabric of the existing community. FEATURES Downtown Development Mixed-Income Housing Neotraditional/New Urbanist Design

Crawford Square Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Project Type: Residential Volume 29 Number 13 July-September 1999 Case Number: C029013 PROJECT TYPE Crawford Square is an 18-acre residential development located on the eastern edge of downtown Pittsburgh that provides a gateway between the downtown business district and the nearby Hill District and creates a new and vital neighborhood recalling the architectural traditions of the neighborhoods to which it is connected. Crawford Square provides quality mixed-income housing in a friendly, pedestrian-oriented neighborhood to residents with a wide range of incomes. The project's street grid is an extension of the Hill District street grid, stitched into the fabric of the existing community. SPECIAL FEATURES DEVELOPER Downtown Development Mixed-Income Housing Neotraditional/New Urbanist Design McCormack Baron Associates Hadley Square 1101 Lucas Avenue St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1179 314-621-3400 314-436-8153 (fax) LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT La Quatra Bonci 95 South 10th St. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15203 412-488-8822 MASTER PLANNER Urban Design Associates Gulf Tower, 31st Floor 707 Grant Street Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 412-263-5200 412-263-5202 (fax) PHASE II ARCHITECT Tai & Lee Architects 3114 Bereton St Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219 PHASE III ARCHITECT (RENTAL) Trivers Associates Nations Bank Tower 100 N. Broadway Suite 1800 St. Louis, Missouri 63102

GENERAL DESCRIPTION Crawford Square includes 426 units of rental as well as for-sale housing. Approximately half of the rental units are subsidized; they are indistinguishable from the market-rate units and are periodically rotated throughout the project. The development is designed to reflect the character and scale of a traditional Pittsburgh residential neighborhood and does not include retail or other commercial development. However, the new residents have helped to attract a new supermarket to the struggling Phoenix Hill Shopping Center located adjacent to Crawford Square. PLANNING/DESIGN The Crawford Square site is located on the eastern edge of downtown Pittsburgh in the lower part of the Hill District, a predominantly African American district of the city. Once a thriving community known for its jazz clubs and ethnic diversity, the area had begun to deteriorate by the 1950s. The community suffered great damage in the 1960s during riots that followed the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. Subsequent urban renewal efforts brought the wholesale removal of homes to make way for construction of the Civic Arena, displacing thousands of lower Hill District residents. The community organized against further commercial encroachment, drawing the line at Crawford Street. The site languished for several years thereafter. By the late 1980s, the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA) of Pittsburgh acquired much of the land and issued a request for proposals to develop the site. Based on its track record of successful inner-city redevelopment, the St. Louis based development firm of McCormack Baron Associates was selected as developer for the project. McCormack Baron then enlisted the services of Pittsburgh-based Urban Design Associates (UDA), an architectural firm with similar inner-city redevelopment credentials, to complete a master plan for the project. A project committee composed of the development team and local community leaders and residents was formed, and the master-planning process was heavily influenced by public input. Through numerous meetings a plan emerged to develop a traditional Pittsburgh residential neighborhood evoking the scale, density, and architectural style of existing East End neighborhoods. UDA conducted formal surveys to determine the defining characteristics of those neighborhoods and incorporated their best aspects in its master plan. The development team sought to establish a mixed-income neighborhood that included multiple housing types multifamily, townhomes, and single-family homes in a wide range of prices. The master plan creates an intimate urban pattern with tight streetscapes and narrow street widths and short 20- to 25-foot building setbacks. The plan called for housing in the Colonial Revival style common in East End neighborhoods. The homes feature tall, narrow windows, bay windows, dormers, and gable ends facing the street. The facades are constructed of brick and clapboard siding for quality and stability. All buildings single family, multifamily, and apartments are two to three stories in height with front and back yards and front porches. Apartment buildings and townhomes feature rear courtyards. The development avoids a cookie-cutter appearance by encouraging variation in design and mixing of building types. The project committee wanted to ensure that Crawford Square offered the amenities of a market-rate development and was designed with the same standard of quality, avoiding the appearance of a subsidized development. Amenities include a community center and swimming pool for residents' use. To further establish and connect Crawford Square to the wider community, the land plan creates three new public parks. New urbanist design principles were employed in both neighborhood and housing design to create a safe and stable neighborhood. Front porches and short setbacks encourage interaction among residents while allowing them to claim "ownership" of neighborhood spaces; the design of the neighborhood leaves no A"unclaimed" space. Public spaces and sidewalks are well-lighted. Despite some initial concerns, crime has been practically nonexistent; as a further deterrent, a few city police officers were encouraged to relocate to the neighborhood by an offer of reduced rents. The modified street grid of Crawford Square seeks to reconnect the Hill District to the downtown core. "We wanted to enable the community to expand toward downtown should the possibility arise," says Barry Long, project manager with UDA. An east/west connection with downtown is largely blocked by the parking lots of the Civic Arena that border Crawford Street on the western edge of the development; the street grid therefore emphasizes a strong north/south orientation with the existing Hill District street grid. The new Protectory Place, with a wide tree-lined median, forms the north/south spine of the neighborhood. Beyond its aesthetic appeal, the median also serves to calm traffic. Crawford Square is a pedestrian-oriented development that acknowledges the reality of the automobile. Some intersections in the community are bulbed to slow traffic, and stop signs are present at all intersections. Sidewalks connect the entire development, both internally and with the surrounding community, and they feature the planting strips, brick strips, and street trees common in Pittsburgh neighborhoods. Low, decorative street lamps keep the sidewalks well-lighted at night. Residents of Crawford Square enjoy easy pedestrian access to public transportation and to the business district and downtown attractions. The steep 15 percent slope of the site precluded the development of the alleys and rear-loaded garages found in a traditional neighborhood. Single family homes feature full basements with front-loaded garages located 12 feet beneath the front porch, hidden from the street. Apartment buildings and townhomes form a perimeter around the

parking areas, hiding them from view; an electronic key card is required to enter these parking areas. Space devoted to off-street parking was kept to a minimum. The city revised its parking standards, allowing for a low 1:1 ratio of units to parking spaces. Ample on-street parking is available for visitors, which further serves to slow traffic through the neighborhood. DEVELOPMENT Phase I of the development, completed in 1993, consists of 203 rental apartments and townhomes; 50 percent of the units are subsidized. In the second and third phases of the development, completed in 1995, the rental program was scaled back in favor of more for-sale housing due to resident and market pressure. In Phase II, 72 new rental units and 30 for-sale units were developed. In Phase III, to be completed in 2000, 74 rental units and 30 for-sale units will be developed. In response to the reduction in rental units, McCormack Baron partnered with the Hill Community Development Corporation (HCDC) in the second and third phases of the development. McCormack Baron continued to develop and manage the rental units, its area of expertise, while the HCDC assumed development of the for-sale housing. The master plan for Crawford Square provides detailed guidelines and covenants meant to foster development of a coherent, attractive community. Nevertheless, to encourage variation, different architectural firms were hired to design the buildings for Phase II and Phase III. The housing was constructed by a variety of local minority firms working with several general contractors. FINANCING Conventional financing was inadequate for Crawford Square. The financing package, particularly for Phase I, was complex and multilayered. In addition to the equity contributed by the developer and obtained through the sale of low-income housing tax credits, four other financing sources were used: the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh (loans and grants); the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency (loans and bond proceeds); a consortium of four local lenders, PNC Bank, Mellon Bank, Dollar Bank, and Integra Bank (loans and grants); and a consortium of local foundations (grants). "Each participant was necessary to the deal and provided an element of credibility that convinced the others to become involved," said Vince Bennett, vice president of McCormack Baron. "The withdrawal of support from any partner could have stopped the development. Spreading the financial risk both increased the community's sense of responsibility and ensured that the project would be done without sacrificing its quality or scope and that it would be affordable to a diverse population." MARKETING/MANAGEMENT The ability to attract market-rate residents is a concern in any mixed income development. To the surprise and delight of the development team, market-rate units in Crawford Square have leased up faster than subsidized units and demand for for-sale housing has been exceptionally strong. Pent-up demand for quality in-town housing combined with Crawford Square's exceptional location and downtown views has worked to attract a strong economic and racial mix of residents. Rents range from less than $300 per month for some one-bedroom apartments to $1,200 per month for a three bedroom townhome. For-sale housing starts at about $89,000, and some four-bedroom units in the final phase of development are selling for as much as $200,000. About 80 percent of residents are African American, many of them former Hill District residents who returned to their old neighborhood because new, quality housing was available. Special financing incentives were provided to homebuyers in the first phase of development. These included a $15,000 grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and a mortgage subsidy of $25,000 from the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh. In light of the unexpectedly strong demand, these offers were significantly scaled back in later phases. McCormack Baron provides management services to all rental units at Crawford Square, as well as the community center, pool, and some common areas. A homeowners association manages the common areas around the for-sale housing portion of the development. The association also is responsible for the enforcement of architectural codes and covenants. EXPERIENCE GAINED As one of the first successful inner-city examples of new urbanism, the community serves as a model for future redevelopment activities. Building on the success of Crawford Square, planning for the eventual redevelopment of the entire Hill District is now underway by neighborhood representatives and city officials. In order to attract market-rate buyers to a mixed-income community, subsidized units must be indistinguishable from market-rate units. At Crawford Square the same level of management service and commitment is extended to all units.

PROJECT DATA LAND USE INFORMATION Site area: 18.5 acres Gross density: 23.0 units/acre Housing types: Rental and for-sale apartments, townhomes,and single family homes Parking: 304 spaces Parking ratio:.71 spaces/unit Dwelling units Rental For-sale Phase I 203 27 Phase II 71 30 Phase III 74 21 Total dwelling units: 426 DEVELOPMENT COST INFORMATION Phase I (rental) Cost Total Cost per dwelling unit Site acquisition $431,600 2,126 2.52 Site preparation 1,000,000 4,926 5.85 Construction 11,725,000 57,758 68.65 Architecture/engineering 927,000 4,566 5.42 Developer fee 500,000 2,463 2.92 Soft costs/other 4,083,400 20,115 23.90 Total $18,667,000 91,955 109.29 Cost per residential square foot (170,788 square feet) Phase II (rental) Cost Total Cost per dwelling unit Site acquisition $166,000 2,338 2.67 Construction 5,000,000 70,422 80.55 Architecture/engineering 412,000 5,802 6.63 Developer fee 1,135,000 15,985 18.28 Soft costs/other 1,287,000 18,126 20.73 Total $8,000,000 112,676 128.89 Cost per residential square foot (62,066 square feet) Phase III (rental) Cost Total Cost per dwelling unit Site acquisition $150,000 (by city) 2,027 Construction 5,399,000 72,959 Architecture/engineering 362,000 4,891 Developer fee 811,000 10,959 Soft costs/other 713,000 9,635 Total $7,285,000 98,445 Development cost Phase I (for sale): $3,469,871 ($128,481/unit) Development cost Phase II (for sale): $4,981,025 ($166,034/unit) Development cost Phase III (for sale): N/A (Will be finished in 2000) Total development cost of rental housing: $33,952,000 Total development cost of for-sale housing: $8,450,896 Total development cost of rental and for-sale housing: $42,402.896 UNIT INFORMATION Type Number Size range (square feet) Price/rent (market rate/affordable)

Phase I (rental) Garden (1 bedroom/1 bath) 61 675 703 $560/$364 Garden (2 bedroom/1 bath) 80 862 $640/$437 Split townhouse (1 bedroom/1 bath) 21 696 698 $600/$364 Split townhouse (2 bedroom/2 bath) 21 1,154 1,009 $775/$437 Townhouse (2 bedroom/1.5 bath) 12 1,006 $750/$437 Townhouse (3 bedroom/1.5 bath) 8 1,205 $875/$488 Phase I (for-sale) Townhouses 9 1,200 1,450 $89,500 $138,900 Detached 18 1,210 1,820 n/a 1 Phase II (rental) Garden (1 bedroom) 19 674 n/a Garden (2 bedroom) 27 880 n/a Townhouse (2 bedroom) 15 880 n/a Townhouse (3 bedroom) 10 1,230 n/a Phase II (for-sale) Townhouse 7 n/a $93,900 $141,000 Detached 23 n/a n/a 1 n/a = not available DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Site acquired: 1987 1990 Planning started: 1988 Construction started: 1991 Phase I completed: 1993 Phase II completed: 1995 Phase III to be completed: 2000 DIRECTIONS From the airport: Take I-279 to Fort Pitt Bridge. Merge on to U.S. 22 East. Take the Boulevard of the Allies/Liberty Avenue exit toward the Civic Arena. Merge on to Liberty Avenue. Turn right on Grant Street. Turn left on Seventh Avenue. Turn right on Washington Place. Turn left on Centre Avenue and Crawford Square. Driving time: approximately 35 minutes in nonpeak traffic. David A. Mulvihill, editor, Project Reference File David A. Mulvihill, report author Eileen Hughes, managing editor Joanne Nanez, layout/art This Development Case Study is intended as a resource for subscribers in improving the quality of future projects. Data contained herein were made available by the project's development team and constitute a report on, not an endorsement of, the project by ULI-the Urban Land Institute. Copyright 1999 by ULI-the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 500 West, Washington D.C. 20007-5201

Occupying 18.5 acres in the lower Hill District of pittsburgh, the mixed-income Crawford Square heals a longstanding rift in the city.

Area residents wanted to ensure that the development would not look like a subsidized project. The design of Crawford Square seeks to reflect the architectural qualities of historic East End neighborhoods.

Multifamily dwellings form a secure perimeter around parking areas and block them from view.

Crawford Square provides easy pedestrian and transit access to downtown pittsburgh. Demand has been high among young professionals.

Subsidized units and market-rate units enjoy the same amenities and are indistinguishable. Subsidized units are rotated periodically to further blur their identities.

Site plan.