Case 5:07-cv F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Similar documents
Case 2:13-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JASPER COUNTY, MISSOURI CIRCUIT DIVISION AT JOPLIN

Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Miami-Dade County (the County ) sues Defendants Miami Marlins, L.P. (the

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Plaintiff, CASE NO. : COMPLAINT FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/22/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/22/2013

COMPLAINT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND OTHER STATUTORY RELIEF. Plaintiff, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2005

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR POLK COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION DIVISION:

Filing # E-Filed 09/10/ :56:35 PM

EXCLUSIVE SELLER LISTING AGREEMENT (ALSO REFERRED TO AS EXCLUSIVE SELLER BROKERAGE AGREEMENT)

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA. CARL E. FALLIN, SR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) CITY OF HUNTSVILLE, ) ) Defendant.

INTERPLEADER COMPLAINT THE PARTIES

from

NON-EXCLUSIVE BUYER BROKERAGE AGREEMENT

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/12/ /30/ :39 06:55 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 136 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/12/2016

GENERAL ASSIGNMENT RECITALS

Case: 1:03-cv Document #: 894 Filed: 07/14/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:16961

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

ESCROW AGREEMENT This Escrow Agreement is made and entered into this day of, 20, by (the Company ) and. (the Escrow Agent ) and

CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Wholesale Relators Supply Co., by and through its attorneys Margolis Edelstein,

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

AMENDED VERIFIED COUNTERCLAIMS. Counter-Plaintiff, Patricia Cohen (Cohen), by and through undersigned counsel, sues

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TIf Il E D WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ~ Vioiations: ~li INDICTMENT.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016

Case 1:15-cv TWP-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT. 1.2 PREMISES: 415 Boston Post Road, Sudbury, MA Parcel ID: K

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1

Plaintiff, SUMMONS WITH VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Nassau County is designated by -against- Plaintiff as the place of trial

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

FLAT FEE MLS LISTING AGREEMENT

ESCROW AGREEMENT. Recitals

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL ESTATE

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. BERNARD K. CHEUNG and BEN WING PUN MOK. and

Case Doc 196 Filed 03/03/17 Entered 03/03/17 16:50:44 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6

Sample. Rider Clauses to Contract of Sale Seller

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SALINE COUNTY, ARKANSAS THIRD DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA

REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT

KEY REALTY LLC OF NEVADA

GENERAL ASSIGNMENT RECITALS

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO NEW LEASE

REMEDIES FEBRUARY 2017 CALIFORNIA BAR EXAM QUESTION #2

v. (Substantively Consolidated) ORDER GRANTING TRUSTEE S MOTION FOR AN ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF ALLOWED CLAIMS

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 772 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 14

FELBA ESCROW AGREEMENT

NOW COME Plaintiffs Elizabeth Zander and Evan Galloway (collectively, "Plaintiffs"),

PAYMENT IN LIEU OF TAXES AGREEMENT

ESCROW AGREEMENT. Relating to the advance crossover refunding of the outstanding

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Retail Leases Amendment Act 2005 No 90

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA

Case 2:08-cv TS -BCW Document 2 Filed 05/23/08 Page 1 of 6

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA

CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO.

Exhibit E Meyers Nave Draft 2/12/14 ESCROW AGREEMENT. by and between the SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF PITTSBURG.

RESERVATION ESCROW AGREEMENT

SHORT SALE AUCTION MARKETING AGREEMENT

Case Doc 904 Filed 02/14/18 Entered 02/14/18 11:48:34 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

GLOUCESTER/SALEM COUNTIES BOARD OF REALTORS STANDARD FORM OF BROKER-SALESPERSON INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

RECITALS. Page 1 of 9

TSB Holdings, LLC (hereinafter referred to as TSB Holdings), a limited liability

RECErVED FOR FlUNG AMERICAN MARKETING GROUP, LLC.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

RESERVATION AGREEMENT

EXCLUSIVE BUYER BROKERAGE AGREEMENT

EXCHANGE AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, Exchanger entered into an dated (the "Purchase Agreement") for the sale of the Relinquished Property to ; and

1. This is an action to challenge the Property Appraiser's assessment in. Plaintiff, UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a

FLOPPING OR A VALID INCREASE IN MARKET VALUE?

ASSIGNMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF MEMBERSHIP AND BENEFICIAL INTEREST

SUBSCRIPTION ESCROW AGREEMENT (PRIVATE PLACEMENT)

OFFICE LEASE. By Richard R. Goldberg Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Philadelphia, Pennsylvania All Rights Reserved 1999 AGREEMENT OF LEASE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiffs, CASE NO.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016

Exhibit C OFFER TO PURCHASE PROPERTY

PACIFIC TRUST DEED SERVICING COMPANY, INC. Collection Escrow Instructions

AGREEMENT. ("Buyers"), and Mr. Investor., whose address is

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS Equipment Lease Form DCR 309

ALABAMA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 790-X-3 DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

BID PROPOSAL FORMS FOR THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CORONA IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

Residential Management Agreement

8:19-cv LSC-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 01/30/19 Page 1 of 11 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

STRAND MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE

EXCLUSIVE SELLER LISTING AGREEMENT (ALSO REFERRED TO AS EXCLUSIVE SELLER BROKERAGE AGREEMENT)

SECTION I APPOINTMENT OF ESCROW AGENT

GENERAL ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS. THE GENERAL ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS (this

RENTAL LEASE AGREEMENT

Case 9:15-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

All County Sterling Property Management Exclusive Rental Management Agreement

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR (PROPERTY NAME - ALL CAPS)

NON-EXCLUSIVE SELLER LISTING AGREEMENT (ALSO REFERRED TO AS OPEN SELLER LISTING AGREEMENT)

Transcription:

Case 5:07-cv-00141-F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA DIXIE AIRE TITLE SERVICES, INC., an Oklahoma corporation, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:07-CV-141 SPW, L.L.C., et al., Defendants. ORIGINAL CROSS-CLAIM OF DEFENDANT MELVYN I. WEISS Defendant Melvyn I. Weiss ( Weiss, for his Original Cross-Claim against Jet Network, LLC ( Jet Network and Stuart L. Cauff ( Cauff, alleges and states as follows: Background Facts 1. During the early months of 2005, defendant Jet Network, LLC ( Jet Network, by and through its owner Stuart Cauff ( Cauff, approached Weiss, a partner of defendant Milberg Weiss & Bershad, LLP ( Milberg Weiss to discuss with him the possibility of entering into a aircraft services agreement with Jet Network that would entail Weiss leasing an airplane to Jet Network for Jet Network to manage, maintain and use in its aircraft charter business. 2. Weiss did not own an airplane to place under Jet Network s management. However, Jet Network, by and through Cauff, told Weiss that Jet Network was negotiating the purchase of a Gulfstream American G-1159A aircraft, registration number N9KL (the Aircraft with defendant SPW, LLC ( SPW and Jet Network would be willing to re-sell Weiss that Aircraft for the same great price it had negotiated with Jet Network. This offer was intriguing to Weiss given that Jet Network, by and through Cauff, represented that the buy-sell agreement it negotiated for the Aircraft was the best one available in the entire industry at this time.

Case 5:07-cv-00141-F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 2 of 7 3. Thereafter, Jet Network, by and through Cauff, provided Weiss with a proposed letter of intent dated June 1, 2005, that purported to memorialize the terms of a purchase agreement between Jet Network and SPW for the Aircraft. Unbeknownst to Weiss, this letter of intent did not represent a bona fide agreement. Instead, it was a fabrication by Jet Network, by and through Cauff, who knowingly misrepresented that Jet Network was purchasing the Aircraft for $6,950,000.00. 4. Jet Network, by and through Cauff, offered to re-sell the Aircraft to Weiss for the same great price of $6,950,000.00 provided that Weiss place the Aircraft under Jet Network s management and pay an escrow deposit of $250,000.00 into the trust account maintained by plaintiff, Dixie Aire, pending Jet Network s consummation of the purchase contract with SPW. Weiss never assented to purchase the Aircraft from Jet Network or place it under Jet Network s management. However, based upon the aforementioned false representations of Jet Network and/or Cauff, Weiss used his own money to pay for an Aircraft inspection and fund the escrow deposit. However, given that Weiss had not assented to purchase the Aircraft from Jet Network this escrow deposit was expressly conditioned upon the following unambiguous terms: Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, Milberg Weiss should have the right to demand, and the parties hereto shall cause, Escrow Agent to refund the Deposit to Milberg Weiss, less applicable Escrow fees, for any reason whatsoever.... (emphasis added. SPW was not a party to Weiss written escrow agreement with Dixie Aire. 5. On June 24, 2005, pursuant to the aforementioned escrow agreement, Weiss transferred Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00 of his personal funds to Dixie Aire. Soon thereafter, Weiss learned for the first time, that Jet Network and Cauff had falsely represented the terms of its buy-sell agreement with SPW. Rather, than purchasing the Aircraft for $6,950,000.00 as they represented, Jet Network was really only paying $5,950,00.00 for the plane. 2

Case 5:07-cv-00141-F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 3 of 7 Accordingly, Jet Network stood to make an immediate profit of One Million Dollars by flipping the Aircraft to Weiss. 6. When Weiss learned of the deception of Jet Network and/or Cauff, he immediately terminated all negotiations concerning the repurchase and management of the Aircraft and demanded an immediate refund of the $250,000.00 he had deposited with Dixie Aire. But even though Dixie Aire was required to refund Weiss his escrow deposit for any reason whatsoever and even though, Dixie Aire did not owe any legal duty to SPW to retain the escrow deposit for its potential benefit, Dixie Aire failed and refused to refund Weiss his money. Instead, on December 2005, Dixie Aire commenced this interpleader action. First Claim for Relief (Indemnity For his first claim for relief, Weiss incorporates paragraphs 1-6 as set forth above in his Original Cross-Claim. 7. In the event that Weiss is found legally liable to SPW for damages as a result of the allegations and claims for relief asserted by in SPW s Amended Cross-Claim, said responsibility was caused by the acts and omissions of Jet Network and/or Cauff and therefore Weiss is entitled to full indemnity from Jet Network and Cauff. WHEREFORE, premises considered Defendant Weiss seeks judgment against Jet Network and Cauff for any amount it is found owing to SPW due to the fact that it was the acts, omissions and conduct of Jet Network and Cauff that caused SPW s damages, if any. Second Claim for Relief (Contribution For its second claim for relief, Weiss adopts and incorporates paragraphs 1-7 as set forth above in his Original Cross-Claim. 3

Case 5:07-cv-00141-F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 4 of 7 8. Weiss denies any and all liability to Jet Network. 9. In the alternative, Weiss asserts that if SPW is awarded judgment against Weiss, to the extent there is joint and several liability established, then Weiss is entitled to contribution against Jet Network and Cauff to the extent he pays or becomes obligated to pay more than his pro rata share of any common liability. WHEREFORE, premises considered Defendant Weiss seeks a judgment against Jet Network and Cauff in contribution for any amount it pays or becomes obligated to pay more than its pro rata share of any common liability. Third Claim for Relief (Breach of Escrow Agreement For his third claim for relief, Weiss adopts and incorporates paragraphs 1-9 as set forth above in his Original Cross-Claim. 10. Weiss and Dixie Aire entered into a written escrow agreement whereby Weiss agreed to deposit $250,000.00 of his own funds into Dixie Aire s escrow account to be held in trust by Dixie Aire who in turn promised Weiss that upon Weiss demand it would immediately refund the entire escrow deposit to him for any reason whatsoever. 11. SPW was not a party to the escrow agreement between Weiss and Dixie Aire. 12. Weiss reposed trust and confidence with Dixie Aire to keep and protect his escrow deposit pursuant to the terms of the escrow agreement. 13. When Weiss realized that Jet Network misrepresented the terms and conditions of its alleged buy-sell agreement with SPW and the transaction was a sham to flip an aircraft to Weiss for an exorbitant profit, Weiss demanded Dixie Aire refund the escrow deposit according to the terms and conditions of the escrow agreement. 4

Case 5:07-cv-00141-F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 5 of 7 14. Although all conditions precedent to Weiss right to demand and receive a refund of his escrow deposit had been performed or had otherwise occurred, Dixie Aire has refused to honor its contractual obligation and refund the same to Weiss. 15. Instead, Dixie Aire has breached its contractual and fiduciary duties to Weiss by unlawfully retaining his escrow funds for the benefit of SPW, a stranger to the escrow agreement, who has no cognizable claim thereto. 16. Dixie Aire should in good conscience and equity return the escrow funds to Weiss. 17. Dixie Aire s conduct is in reckless disregard for the rights of others entitling Weiss to an award of punitive damages. 18. As a direct and proximate result of Dixie Aire s unlawful conduct, Weiss has suffered and continues to suffer damages and other loss in excess of $75,000.00. WHEREFORE, premises considered Defendant Weiss prays for judgment against Dixie Aire for actual and exemplary damages, costs of suit and attorneys fees and such other and further relief that this Court deems proper. Fourth Claim for Relief (Fraud by Jet Network and/or Cauff For its fourth claim for relief, Weiss adopts and incorporates paragraphs 1-18 as set forth above in his Original Cross Claim. 19. Jet Network made knowingly false representations to Weiss for the purposes of inducing his assent to repurchase the Aircraft for an inflated purchase price. 20. Weiss reasonably relied upon the false representations of Jet Network and Cauff to pay hundreds of thousands of his own dollars to have the Aircraft inspected and fund the escrow deposit in trust with Dixie Aire. 5

Case 5:07-cv-00141-F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 6 of 7 21. Jet Network and Cauff have acted in reckless disregard for the rights of others entitling Weiss to an award of punitive damages. 22. As a direct and proximate result of Dixie Aire s unlawful conduct, Weiss has suffered and continues to suffer damages and other loss in excess of $75,000.00. WHEREFORE, premises considered Defendant Weiss prays for judgment against Dixie Aire for actual and exemplary damages, costs of suit and attorneys fees and such other and further relief that this Court deems proper. Respectfully submitted, s/tony Gould Tony Gould, OBA #18564 Leonard, Gould & Brown, PLLC 116 E. Sheridan, Suite 270 Oklahoma City, OK 73104 (405 605-8383 Facsimile: (405 605-8381 e-mail: tgould@lgblawfirm.com Attorney for Defendant Melvyn I. Weiss 6

Case 5:07-cv-00141-F Document 60 Filed 06/12/2007 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 12 th day of June, 2007, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk of Court using the ECF System for filing and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the following ECF registrant: Mark D. Mitchell Mitchell, Davis, Klein & Pickens 101 Park Avenue, Suite 250 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 mdmoklaw@cs.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Brian L. Peterson, P.C. 101 Park Avenue, Suite 275 Oklahoma City, OK 73102 bpeterson@blppc.com Henry A. Meyer, III Abowitz, Timberlake & Dahnke, P.C. P.O. Box 1937 Oklahoma City, OK 73101-1937 mainmail@abowitzlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant SPW, LLC and mailed to: Jet Network, LLC c/o Seth Coblentz 420 Lincoln Road, Suite 365 Miami Beach, FL 33139 s/tony Gould Tony Gould 7